Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 21
Prosocial Behavior
Defining Prosocial Behavior
Helpful action that benefits other people without necessarily providing any direct benefits to the person performing the act, and may even involve a risk for the person who helps When a Stranger is Distressed: Heroism or Apathy? – Heroism—actions that involve courageous risk-taking to obtain a socially valued goal • (e.g., a dangerous act to save a stranger’s life) – Bystander effect—the likelihood of a prosocial response to an emergency is affected by the number of bystanders who are present • Kitty Genovese’s murder led to research in this area. – In New York City, 38 people witnessed her being stabbed to death over a period of 45 minutes, but no one called the police. Responding to an Emergency – Pluralistic Ignorance—tendency of bystanders to rely on what other bystanders do and say, even though none of them is sure about what is happening or what to do about it and this “information” is used to justify the failure to act • Latane and Darley’s (1968) smoke-filled room experiment showed that people will risk harm to themselves rather than possibly look foolish. • This is less likely to happen when people are friends rather than strangers • Altruistic Personality— combination of dispositional variables associated with prosocial behavior – Empathy (feel what the other person feels) – Belief in a just world (good deeds get rewarded) – Social responsibility (it is one’s duty) – Internal locus of control (in control of one’s outcome) – Low egocentrism (not self-absorbed) Factors Influencing Prosocial Behavior 1. Situational or external factors influence helping: Similarity and responsibility -Helping people we like -Helping those who are not responsible for their problem 2. Exposure to live prosocial models 3. Gratitude –how it increases further helping – Gratitude increases prosocial behavior, primarily by enhancing helpers’ feelings of self-worth. 4. Emotions and prosocial behavior –Emotions apply strong effects on the tendency to help others. Positive feelings increase this tendency, whereas negative ones tend to reduce it. –In addition, feelings of elevation —being inspired by others’ kind or helpful acts— increases our own tendency to help. Motives for Prosocial Behavior or Theoretical Explanations of Prosocial Motivation 1) Empathy-Altruism • Empathy: ‘Emotional reactions that are focused on or oriented toward other people and include feelings of compassion, sympathy, and concern.’ • Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis: ‘The suggestion that some prosocial acts are motivated solely by the desire to help someone in need.’ • It feels good to help others • Emotional empathy, cognitive component of empathic accuracy and empathic concern. 2) Negative State Relief
• Negative-state relief model: ‘The proposal that
prosocial behavior is motivated by the bystander’s desire to reduce his or her own uncomfortable negative emotions or feelings.’ • Helping sometimes reduces unpleasant feelings. 3) Empathic Joy • Empathic Joy Hypothesis: ‘The view that helpers respond to the needs of a victim because they want to accomplish something, and doing so is rewarding in and of itself.’ • Helping as an accomplishment. 4) Competitive Altruism • This view suggests that one important reason why people help others is that doing so boosts their own status and reputation and, in this way, ultimately brings them large benefits, ones that more than offset the costs of engaging in prosocial actions. • Status, reputation, people with desirable personal qualities, social recognition, etc. • For example; buildings dedicated to their names. 5) Kin Selection Theory • Kin Selection Theory: ‘A theory suggesting that a key goal for all organisms—including human beings—is getting our genes into the next generation; one way in which individuals can reach this goal is by helping others who share their genes.’ • Helping ourselves by helping people who share our genes. • Helping people with genetic similarity (close relatives) and young relatives. 6) Defensive Helping • Defensive Helping: ‘Help given to members of outgroups to reduce the threat they pose to the status or distinctiveness of one’s own in-group.’ • Helping outgroups to reduce their threat to one’s in- group. • Defensive helping is performed not primarily to help the recipients, but rather to “put them down” in subtle ways and so reduce their threat to the in-group’s status. Long-Term Commitment To Helping • Volunteering – People spend many hours engaging in voluntary acts that help others. – Volunteering involves the same steps as does responding to an emergency. • Noticing the problem, interpreting it accurately, assuming responsibility, deciding how to act, and engaging in the behavior – Volunteering differs by ethnic group in the United States • Whites tend to help animals, the environment, and emergency personnel. • African Americans tend to help homeless or hungry people, groups fighting for civil rights, and religious institutions. • Asian Americans tend to help museums and other artistic and cultural institutions. • Hispanics tend to help immigrants and people in other countries. Long-term Commitment to Helping • Self-Interest, Moral Integrity, and Moral Hypocrisy – People tend to overestimate how often they act morally and believe that they are more likely to engage in selfless acts than are most other people. – Motivation and morality • Three major motives that affect how someone acts when faced with a moral dilemma are self-interest, moral integrity, and moral hypocrisy. – Self-Interest—motivation to engage in whatever behavior provides the greatest satisfaction for oneself Egoism —exclusive concern with one’s own personal needs rather than with the needs of others – Moral Integrity—motivation to be moral and actually to engage in moral behavior – Moral Hypocrisy—motivation to appear moral while doing one’s best to avoid the costs involved in actually being moral