Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Tma

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22

Target Motion Analysis for the Localization of Subsurface Targets

Stephen Haptonstahl Northern Illinois University December 3, 1999


Target Motion Analysis

Disclaimer or How Different Cultures Say I dont know


Politician: We have a Congressional committee investigating that issue. Programmer: You cant do that in Windows. That only works in UNIX. Consultant: I can provide that information, but it will cost you more. Military: Id tell you, but its classified, so then Id have to kill you. Math student: We never talked about that in class. Math Professor: Thats beyond the scope of the course.

Target Motion Analysis

The Company: Your Country US Navy


369,220 sailors in uniform (1 officer/6 enlisted)
Who joins the Navy?

316 Ships & Subs almost half underway Operating in every part of the world

Other branches
Total # of people

Allied forces
# of other nations
Target Motion Analysis

Target Motion Analysis


Strategy: Prevent enemy submarines from getting close enough to destroy your ship Tactic: Keep the sub occupied dodging helicopterlaunched torpedoes. Problem: Where do you send your helicopter?

The Captain wants an answer in 30 minutes!

Target Motion Analysis

Describing Location in Maritime Warfare


Bearing and Range from ownship - polar coordinates
Bearing (BRG): Compass direction (true, not magnetic) from ownship to target in degrees (mills used in gunnery 6400 mills = 360) Range (RNG): Distance to target in yards or nautical miles Relative reference frame must correct for ownship motion to get true (WRT Earth) motion

Latitude (N-S) and Longitude (E-W)


Geo-fixed reference frame

Nautical Mile (NM)


Defined to be 1/60 degree latitude (equator to pole:=5400 NM) Equal to about 6000 feet, 2000 yards, or 1.1 statute mile

Target Motion Analysis

Primary Sources of Information


Active sonar
Bearing, range, perhaps depth of target course and speed Very limited range Counterdetection (perhaps 10X sonar range) Amorous marine life

Passive sonar
Greater range No counterdetection issues (other that normal) No range information no course and speed Must use TMA to get range, course, speed

Target Motion Analysis

Other Sources of Information


Visual periscopes leave wakes
Lookouts (ours or on other ships) (BRG & est. RNG) Pilots (est. lat & lon)

Sonobuoys
Yardstick range from buoy Pointer bearing from buoy Cadillac - both

MAD Magnetic anomaly detector


Very short range, but cant mistake a whale for a sub

EW - Reception of their radar or radio emissions BRG only Intelligence


SOSUS Sound Surveillance System Various classified sources
Target Motion Analysis

TMA Team
Composition
Evaluator South & North Plotters Time/Bearing Plotter Time/Frequency Plotter R/T talker and Sharps

PC
Sharps

TF N TB RT
Surface/ Subsurface Warfare Supervisor

Input
Sonar/EW/Intel Priorities set by CO

Geo-fixed plot S E

Manual Surface Radar

Output
Location of targets Course/speed recommendations
Target Motion Analysis

TMA Team Layout on an AEGIS cruiser

Line of Sound
Line of Sound (LOS): A moving reference line joining ownship and the target
STI STA SOA SOI SOI STI STA SOA SOI STI STA SOA

Lag: target and ownship speed vectors on opposite sides of LOS

Lead: target and ownship speed vectors on same side of LOS, STA > SOA

Overlead: target and ownship speed vectors on same side of LOS, STA < SOA

Opening: Range increasing

Closing: Range decreasing

Target Motion Analysis

Line of Sound Evaluators Plot


Purpose: Determine the course and speed of the target
000

STI
g nin Ope sing o Lag Cl

Lead STA
090

270

rle Ove ad
180
Target Motion Analysis

*Expires after ~5 degrees of bearing shift

DRT & Geo-fixed Plot


Recognizing LOS Geometries
Lag Lead Overlead
Max Range Min Range

Min spd = ownship spd Input: almost everything Speed strips get course, speed, range This is where all the information is compiled, where the Captain will look for a picture of whats going on
Target Motion Analysis
6 kts

Time-Bearing Plot Range Calculations


CPA at graph inflection point
convexity determines whether opening or closing

Spiess
Useful when target has low bearing rate (<1/min) (not common) Cross-fix using only one ship

Single-leg Ekelund
Doesnt require ownship maneuver Requires an estimated STA

Double-leg Ekelund
Uses info before and after ownship maneuver Yields accurate range at a time near the maneuver Often targets relative motion allows this technique
Target Motion Analysis

Single-Leg Ekelund
R x

x R 1 x 1 2 Differentiate, sec = = SA t R t R SA SA cos 2 SA R = = 2 t sec t t tan = R Total speed across the LOS Bearing rate

Target Motion Analysis

Doppler Effect Time-Frequency Plot


Using rt = d, we can determine the perceived change in frequency caused by STI & SOI
Sw = Speed of sound in sea water, 1664 yds/sec SI = STI + SOI fr = received frequency f0 = emitted frequency fcorr = f0 affected only by target motion
Sw fr f0 = S w + SI fr SI = f 1 S w 0 ( S w + SI ) fr = f0 Sw

Plot fr, then calculate SOI to get fcorr Changes in fcorr are caused by
Changes in STI caused by shifting LOS geometry Target maneuvers (best way to detect target maneuvers)
Target Motion Analysis

Applying the Doppler Formula Assume ownship fixed, or correct for SOI fcorr increases as STI does
Lag Lead
f corr (t ) = f corr ' (t ) = f0 ST I (t ) + f 0 Sw f0 ST I ' (t ) Sw

Overlead

Our view or him is shifting more toward his stern (tail), so STI is decreasing
Target Motion Analysis

We have yet to see his bow (nose), so STI is increasing

Line of Sound Determination


Lines on GeoFcorr fixed plot (f0 plus STI) Dont cross Cross Cross Decreasing Decreasing Increasing LOS Get from GeoGeometry fixed plot Lead Lag Overlead Min speed Min range Max range

Target Motion Analysis

What If We Know the Targets Speed?


Sources
Blade count + ID of class = speed Intelligence
We believe a Kilo is transiting from Murmansk to Cuba over x days, so expect a minimum speed of y knots.

Geo-fixed plot (speed strips; lead geometry)

What we get
If we have max(fc) (perhaps a natural transition from overlead to lag) then we can get f0 Evaluator can improve LOS diagram to better estimate course Geo-fixed plot can accurately fix strips to get course and range
Target Motion Analysis

What If We Know the Emitted Frequency (f0)? Sources


Inflection point of fc Crazy Ivan (like in Hunt for Red October): Target turns through 360 to check for contacts in his baffles (wake). We get f0 halfway between max(fcorr) and min(fcorr). Also get contact speed.

We get
Very accurate course Warren (freq) range
Target Motion Analysis

Water is Thicker than Vacuum Convergence Zones

Sound moves along paths of least resistance Salinity, temperature and pressure all change with depth and affect sound propagation Balance struck is a set of distinct solutions, each a path
Target Motion Analysis

The Layer

The sharp temperature gradient at the layer causes most sound to be reflected
Target Motion Analysis

Technology on the Horizon


Expert systems AI based TMA
Can we do it? Is it a good idea?

Bottom bounce
Multiple instances of the same sound coming in at slightly different times from different angles

Ambient noise
We see with ambient light, why not apply this idea to sonar?

Improved active sonar has reduced counterdetection range

Target Motion Analysis

Advanced Techniques and Further Questions Tactics


What are good maneuvers to recommend that will:
Maximize information on the target Minimize counterdetection
Zigzag plans EMCON

How do we respond to target maneuvers?

Whats the best we can do with these formulas? Can we get more from less?
Target Motion Analysis

You might also like