30120140503001

International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 – 6340(Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online), Volume 5, Issue 3, March (2014), pp. 01-09, © IAEME
1
DESIGN AND THERMAL ASPECTS OF WATER COOLED PRIMARY
MIRROR FOR SYNCHROTRON RADIATION
Jitendra Singh1*
, Narendra K Maurya2
, Akhilesh K Karnewar3
, Vikas4
, Harendra Singh5
1, 2, 3, 4
Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology (RRCAT), Indore (MP) INDIA
5
National thermal power cooperation (NTPC), Barh (Bihar) INDIA
ABSTRACT
This paper describes the thermal analysis of water cooled primary mirror used in BL-23 of
Indus-2 at RRCAT in which the mirror thermal deformation was minimized for acceptable optical
performance. The primary mirror separates the visible part from synchrotron radiation by reflecting
visible part to perpendicular plane. In worst condition the primary mirror will be subjected to intense
heat load of 150 W, primarily due to X-Ray absorption. This intense heat load will distort the
reflecting surface. So couple-field thermo-structural numerical simulations was carried out using
ANSYS, to decide effective cooling scheme and optimum cooling parameter such as number of
cooling channel, diameter of cooling channel, position of cooling channels, discharge rate of coolant,
in such a way that deformation of reflecting surface of primary mirror was maintained between 20-
30 µm for reliable imaging. Since primary mirror system will operate in ultra high vacuum condition,
leak testing of brazed joints involved in primary mirror system is also carried out.
Keywords: Thermal Analysis, Synchrotron Radiation, ANSYS, Ultra High Vacuum, Primary Mirror
System.
1. INTRODUCTION
Synchrotron radiation (SR) is emitted by the relativistic electron when it undergoes bending
in dipole magnet. The spectrum of SR coming out of source ranges from infrared to hard X-rays. A
beam line is needed to guide synchrotron radiation from source to experimental station [1, 2]. Beam
line has many optical and mechanical subsystems. Primary mirror (PM) is one of the opto-
mechanical subsystems which are used in beamline 23 (BL-23). PM is a metallic mirror placed in
such a way that it reflects visible part of synchrotron radiation, which is coming out horizontally
from bending magnet, in vertically upward direction. However, other components of SR like X-
Rays, Infra-Red and ultraviolet get deposited on primary mirror (refer to Fig 1).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
AND TECHNOLOGY (IJMET)
ISSN 0976 – 6340 (Print)
ISSN 0976 – 6359 (Online)
Volume 5, Issue 3, March (2014), pp. 01-09
© IAEME: www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp
Journal Impact Factor (2014): 7.5377 (Calculated by GISI)
www.jifactor.com
IJMET
© I A E M E

2
Fig 1: Schematic diagram of Visible diagnostic beamline 23 (BL-23)
Fig 2: Photograph of primary mirror which was finally installed at BL-23
The photons of these components deposit their energy in the form of heat which gives rise to
thermal deformation of reflecting surface of mirror and hence cause the image distortion [3, 4, 5] and
PM will operate in ultra high vacuum (UHV) condition, so special care need to be taken in material
selection and joints involved.
The primary objective of this paper is to discuss material selection, coupled thermal and
structural analysis [6] of primary mirror using finite element method to study the effect of flow and
geometric parameter such as position of cooling channel, diameter of cooling channel, and flow-rate
on the deformation of the reflecting surface and leak testing of fabricated primary mirror system with
recommendation of thermal analysis.
2. DESIGN ASPECTS
Primary mirror is a crucial component of visible diagnostic beam line. There are many design
constraints which govern the performance of primary mirror but the intense continuous heat-load in
form of SR is the most important design constraint. Other design constraints are as follows.

3
a. Low thermal deformation of reflecting surface
b. Ultra High Vacuum (UHV) compatibility [7]
c. Precise control over orientation and positioning
d. Ease of maintenance
OFHC (Oxygen free high conductivity) copper has been selected as a material of primary
mirror owing to its thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity and UHV compatibility. Primary mirror
should have good reflectivity, surface fish, and flatness. To improve the optical properties of primary
mirror, reflecting surface of the substrate is nickel coated and then gold plated. Gold plating is done
in order to improve surface property and optical polishing was carried out to improve surface finish
(50 Å) and flatness.
3. PRIMARY MIRROR THERMAL LOADING
For Indus-2 having energy 2.5 GeV, current 300 mA and radius of curvature of bending
magnet 5.5m, the total radiated power in one revolution is 186 KW, which gives approximately
30W per mrad. Visible diagnostic beam line has 7mrad opening angle (along the x –axis). With this
opening angle there is total heat load of 210 W deposited on the shaded area of reflecting surface
(refer Fig 3). Its dimension in projected plane normal to beam axis is 35 mm (±17.5 mm about
centre) × 54mm.
Fig 3: Schematic diagram of primary mirror
3.1 Finite element modelling
Photons deposits their energy in the bulk of mirror substrate and results in volumetric heat
generation. However, to model worst condition it can assume that photon deposits their energy on
the reflecting surface. Without loss of generality one can assume that reflecting surface is exposed to
heat flux numerically equivalent to deposited energy by photon per unit area of reflecting surface.
Primary mirror is descritzed using PLANE55 element, which is a plane element with a two-
dimensional thermal conduction capability. The element has four nodes with a single degree of
freedom, temperature, at each node.

4
Heat transfer coefficient was calculated using Dittus and Boelter correlation
Nu= {.026(Re0.8
) (Pr0.3
) for cooling 5≤ Pr≤3 and 104
≤Re ≤ 106
[8] (1)
Following assumptions were made in the modelling the primary mirror:
1. Heat flux follows the Possion distribution along Y-axis but we assumed uniform heat flux of .06
W/mm2
-K.
2. Heat loss by conduction through the supports of primary mirror, natural convection and through
radiation is neglected.
3. Material properties such as specific heat, conductivity and viscosity are considered to be
independent of temperature and their values are taken at room temperature.
3.1.1 Boundary conditions
1. For structural analysis the bottom portion of mirror is assumed to be fixed.
2. For thermal analysis the irradiated surface is assumed to have heat flux of .06 W/mm2
-K.
3. For thermal analysis the coolant channel surfaces are assumed to be having constant value of
heat transfer coefficient.
3.1.2 Parameter which affect the thermal deformation of reflecting surface
1. Flow parameter
a. Inlet temperature of coolant
b. coolant flow velocity
2. Geometrical properties
a. Diameter of cooling channel.
b. Normal distance of axis of cooling channel from reflecting surface.
c. Number of cooling channels.
3.1.3 Limitation on the parameters
1. Diameter of cooling channel can be 4.4 mm, 6 mm, 10 mm.
2. Inlet temperature can be between 10°C to 40°C.
3. Discharge is given as 2 liters/min, so velocity can take only limited values based on the assumed
diameter of coolant channel.
4. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
A Steady, two dimensional finite element model was developed using ANSYS [9]. Initial
temperature of Primary mirror and inlet temperature of coolant was taken 300 0
K for all analysis.
The number of cooling channels was kept two in all analysis because of manufacturing constraints.
The analysis was done in two cases. In first case the distance between the axes of coolant channel
was kept constant and normal distance of axes of coolant from reflecting surface was varied. In
second case the distance between the axes of coolant channel is varied, keeping normal distance of
axes of coolant from reflecting surface constant.
Case1: The distance between the axes of coolant channel was kept constant and normal distance of
axes of coolant from reflecting surface was varied for various diameter of cooling channel.

5
Fig 4: Variation in the deformation of heating surface as axis of cooling channel is moved away
from surface for various diameter of cooling channel
1. Red line at 20µm and 30 µm shows the acceptable range of deformations, for 6 mm diameter of
cooling channel the normal distance of axes of cooling channel should be kept between 5.5mm
to 7.5 mm and for 4mm diameter of cooling channel it should be kept between 4.5mm to 8mm
to limit the deformation of heating surfaces between 20-30 µm.
2. As the diameter of coolant channel decreases the deformation of heating surface decreases for
same distance of axis of cooling channel from heating surface.
3. Slope of curve decreases as the diameter of cooling channel is decreased i.e. the rate of increase
in deformation as the axis of cooling channel move away from heating surface is decreased.
4. With above observation the 4 mm diameter cooling channel with 4.5 mm distance from the
heating surface should be used.
Case 2: Distance between the axes of coolant channel is varied for different diameter of coolant
channel keeping the normal distance of axis of coolant channel from the heating surface equals to
8.75 mm.
Fig 5: Variation in the deformation of heating surface as the distance between the axes of coolant
channel is varied for different diameter of cooling channel keeping normal distance from heating
surface equals to 8.75mm

6
1. As the diameter of cooling channel decreases the deformation of heating surface reduces for
given normal distance of axis of coolant channel from heating surface.
2. As observed in Fig 5 the curves are almost straight line, this shows the distance between the axes
of coolant has little effect on the deformation of heating surface.
(a) Distance between the axes of coolant
channel is 40mm
(b) Distance between the axes of coolant
channel is 30mm
(c) Distance between the axes of coolant
channel is 20mm
(d) Distance between the axes of coolant
channel is 15mm
Fig 6: Effect on the Temperature distribution across the primary mirror with varying distance
between the axis of coolant channel for 6mm diameter cooling channel

7
Referring to Fig 6 it can be seen that
1. As the distance between the axes of coolant channel was decreased the maximum temperature
rise initially decreases then increases.
2. As the distance between axes of coolant channel was decreased the maximum temperature rise
zone spread along the heating surface and it gets narrow through the thickness of mirror
substrate.
3. As the distance between the axes of coolant channel is reduced the temperature gradient along
the heating surface decreases and temperature gradient through the thickness of mirror
substrate increases, these two factors cancel each other and hence varying distance between
axes of coolant has very little effect on deformation of heating surface.
4.1 Leak Testing of Primary mirror mount
Fig 7: Primary Mirror mount
The whole primary mirror system will operate in UHV condition so the brazing joint between
Cu tube & SS316L flange of the primary mirror mount need to be check for leak before welding with
bellow because after welding if there will be any leak found during leak testing then the whole
assembly will not be able to use in the beam line. For the leak testing of this joint, an extra chamber
(this chamber is already qualified in 10-10mbar-l/sec leak rate), an Al flange with centre hole to
allow Cu tubes to insert in the chamber.
Fig 8: Al flange & Back side of mirror mount flange
Brazing
joints
O-ring
Back side of Mirror
mount flange

8
The mirror mount flange has tapped hole on its back face due to this reason a O-ring of
35mm diameter is used to provide sealing. The O-ring was compressed between Al flange & mirror
mount flange and provides sealing.
Fig 9: Assembly of primary mirror mount with Chamber for leak testing
As shown in the Fig 9 different mild steel blocks, C clamps along with studs were used to
assemble mirror mount with chamber and Al flange.
In order to leak testing of the brazing joint Outside-in method of Helium leak testing method
was used and the chamber was connected to Mass Spectrometer Leak Detector (MSLD) and
evacuated after that He gas was sprayed on the brazing joint and tested for leak. The joint has
qualified in 10-10
mbar-l/sec order of leak rate.
Fig 10: Welded assembly of Mirror mounts with bellow
C-clamps
Mirror
mounting
face

9
5. CONCLUSION
The parametric study was done with two cooling channel and keeping coolant inlet
temperature 300°K. Following conclusions were made based on the observations of analysis.
1. Using 10mm diameter cooling channel the flatness of cooling channel cannot be achieved
between 20-30µm with any combination of normal distance of axes coolant channel from heating
surface and distance between the axes of cooling channel.
2. Using 6 mm diameter cooling channel, if normal distance of axes coolant channel from heating
surface is equal to or less than 7.5 mm with any combination of distance between the axes of
coolant channel the flatness of heating can achieved between 20- 30µm .
3. Using 4 mm diameter cooling channel , if normal distance of axes coolant channel from heating
surface is equal to or less than 8mm with any combination of distance between the axes of
coolant channel the flatness of heating can achieved between 20-30µm.
4. The primary mirror system was fabricated with cooling channel of 4mm diameter and distance of
its axis from reflecting surface equals to 5mm. The fabricated system was leak test and qualified
in 10-10
mbar-l/sec order of leak rate.
REFERENCES
1. Boland, M.J., Walsh, G.S., et al., "X-ray and optical diagnostics beamlines at the Australian
Synchrotron storage ring”, Int. Acct. Conf. Proc. EPAC, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2006, pp. 3263-
3265.
2. Raghuvanshi V. K., Dhamgaye V. P., Singh A. K., and Nandedkar R. V., "Design and
Development of Front-end components of Indus-2 Bending Magnet Beamlines", AIP Conf.
Proc. 879, pp. 631-634
3. P. Revesz, A. Kazimirov, I. Bazarov “In situ visualization of thermal distortions of synchrotron
radiation optics”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A (2007), 576,
pp.422–429
4. Richard DiGENNARO, Bruce GEE, Jim GUIGLI, Henning HOGREFE and Malcolm
HOWELLS, “A WATER-COOLED MIRROR SYSTEM FOR SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A (1988), 266, pp. 498-
506.
5. Malcolm R. HOWELLS and Peter Z. TAKACS “USE OF DIAMOND TURNED MIRRORS
FOR SYNCHROTRON RADIATION” Nuclear Instruments and Methods (1982), 195, pp.
251-257.
6. ZOU Yi-Qing, WANG Na, KANG Ling, QU Hua-Min, HE Zhe-XiYU, Jie-Bing “Thermal
analysis and cooling structure design of the primary Collimator in CSNS/RCS” Chinese
Physics C (2013),37(5), pp. 057004(1-5).
7. J Reid “The attainment of uhv in synchrotron light sources a review” Vacuum (1993), 44(5-7),
pp. 473-477.
8. Yunus A. Cengel “Heat Transfer: A practical approach”
9. ANSYS, Version 14.5. ANSYS Inc.

30120140503001

More Related Content

30120140503001