1. Effects of Acid Rain Regulations on Production of Eastern Coals of Varying Sulfur Content. (2015). Douglas, Stratford ; Wiggins, Seth .
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:wvu:wpaper:15-38.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Should we be worried about the green paradox? Announcement effects of the Acid Rain Program. (2014). van der Werf, Edwin ; Lange, Ian ; Di Maria, Corrado.
   In: European Economic Review.
   RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:69:y:2014:i:c:p:143-162.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Should we be Worried about the Green Paradox? Announcement Effects of the Acid Rain Program. (2012). van der Werf, Edwin ; Lange, Ian ; Di Maria, Corrado.
   In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
   RePEc:ces:ceswps:_3829.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring and Investment in Pollution Abatement. (2005). Fowlie, Meredith.
   In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
   RePEc:ags:aaea05:19265.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. The environment as a factor of production. (2004). Larson, Donald ; Considine, Timothy J..
   In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
   RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:3271.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. The Paparazzi Take a Look at a Living Legend: The SO2 Cap-and-Trade Program for Power Plants in the United States. (2003). Palmer, Karen ; Burtraw, Dallas.
   In: Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-03-15.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. The Paparazzi Take a Look at a Living Legend: The SO2 Cap-and-Trade Program for Power Plants in the United States. (2003). Palmer, Karen L ; Burtraw, Dallas.
   In: Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:ags:rffdps:10665.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Sulfur Dioxide Control by Electric Utilities: What Are the Gains from Trade?. (2000). Palmer, Karen ; Cropper, Maureen ; Burtraw, Dallas.
   In: Journal of Political Economy.
   RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:108:y:2000:i:6:p:1292-1326.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Innovation Under the Tradable Sulfur Dioxide Emission Permits Program in the U.S. Electricity Sector. (2000). Burtraw, Dallas.
   In: Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-00-38.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Electricity Restructuring: Consequences and Opportunities for the Environment. (2000). Heintzelman, Martin ; Palmer, Karen L ; Burtraw, Dallas.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:rffdps:10854.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Sulfur Dioxide Control by Electric Utilities: What Are the Gains from Trade?. (2000). Cropper, Maureen ; Palmer, Karen L ; Burtraw, Dallas ; Carlson, Curtis .
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:rffdps:10790.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Innovation Under the Tradable Sulfur Dioxide Emission Permits Program in the U.S. Electricity Sector. (2000). Burtraw, Dallas.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:rffdps:10599.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Sulfur-Dioxide Control By Electric Utilities: What Are the Gains from Trade?. (1998). Palmer, Karen ; Cropper, Maureen ; Burtraw, Dallas ; Carlson, Curtis .
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-98-44-rev.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Averch, Harvey and Leland Johnson. 1962. Behavior of the firm under regulatory constraint, American Economic Review, 52, pp. 1052-1069.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Bailey, Elizabeth M. 1996. Allowance Trading Activity and State Regulatory Rulings: Evidence from the U.S. Acid Rain Program, MIT-CEEPR 96-002 W.P., March.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

3. Bernstein, Mark, Alex Farrell, and James Winebrake. 1994. The Impact of Restricting the SO2 Allowance Market, Energy Policy, 22, pp. 748-754.

4. Bohi, Douglas and Dallas Burtraw. 1991. Avoiding Regulatory Gridlock in the Acid Rain Program, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 676-684.

5. Bohi, Douglas and Dallas Burtraw. 1992. Utility Investment Behavior and the Emission Trading Market, Resources and Energy, vol. 14, no. 1-2, pp. 129-153.

6. Bohi, Douglas and Dallas Burtraw. 1997. SO2 Allowance Trading: How Do Expectations and Experience Measure Up? The Electricity Journal, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 67-75.

7. Bohi, Douglas R. 1994. Utilities and State Regulators are failing to take advantage of emission allowance trading, The Electricity Journal, pp. 20-27.

8. Carlson, Curtis, Dallas Burtraw, Maureen Cropper, and Karen L. Palmer. 1998. SO2 Control by Electric Utilities: What are the Gains from Trade?, working paper.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. CASES: Re Ohio Power Co., 127 PUR4th 329 (Ohio P.U.C.1991). Compliance Preapproval Statutes: Senate Bill 143.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. CASES: Re Potomac Edison Co., 129 PUR4TH 1 (MD.P.S.C.1992) Lile and Burtraw RFF 98-35 28 MASSACHUSETTS Rate of Return: No Action Cost recovery rules: No Action Treatment of benefits/costs from allowance transactions: Western Massachusetts Electric plans to credit ratepayers with 80% of the revenues it gains from selling SO2 allowances. The 80% credited to ratepayers is divided among demand-side management, environmental programs, and economic development incentives. A portion also goes directly toward offsetting rates. The remaining 20% of the revenues go to shareholders as an incentive for the utility company to obtain the maximum revenues possible for the sale of surplus SO2 allowances.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Coggins, Jay S. and Vincent H. Smith. 1993. Some welfare effects of emission allowance trading in a twice-regulated industry, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 275-297.

12. Ellerman, A. Denny, Richard Schmalensee, Paul L. Joskow, Juan Pablo Montero, and Elizabeth M. Bailey. 1997. Summary Evaluation: The US SO2 Emissions Trading Program as Implemented in 1995.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Fullerton, Don, Shaun P. McDermott, and Jonathan P. Caulkins. 1995. Sulfur Dioxide Compliance of a regulated Utility, draft.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

14. Gordon, Robert J. 1990. The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

15. Lack of Action: N/A CASES: None Lile and Burtraw RFF 98-35 35 NEW YORK Rate of Return: No Action Cost recovery rules: Although not explicitly addressed, as of 1994, the New York Public Service Commission was leaning towards revenue rebate and recovery one for one through a fuel adjustment clause (FAC).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Lack of Action: N/A CASES: Re Illinois Power Co., 92-0191, Oct. 15, 1992 (Ill.C.C.). Re Central Ill. Pub. Serv. Co., 91-0193, March 18, 1992 (Ill.C.C.). Re Illinois Power Co., 127 PUR4th 354 (Ill.C.C.1991). Compliance Preapproval Statutes: Illinois Public Utilities Act, section 8-402.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Lile and Burtraw RFF 98-35 17 FLORIDA Rate of Return: No Action Cost recovery rules: In Florida, cost recovery clauses are used to either collect allowance expenses or rebate allowance revenues. One Florida utility uses an environmental compliance cost recovery clause while the other uses a fuel adjustment clause. Both clauses are adjusted every 6 months, once in the spring and once in the fall. The Florida PUC, however, allows net revenues generated from below the line allowance transactions to be retained 100 % by the utility.5 On April 13, 1993, Florida established an environmental cost recovery clause (ECRC). The new statute authorized the recovery of prudently incurred environmental compliance costs through the environmental cost recovery factor. The PSC defines environmental compliance costs as all costs or expenses incurred by an electric utility in complying with environmental laws or regulations, including but not limited to in-service capital investments.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Lile and Burtraw RFF 98-35 41 OKLAHOMA Rate of Return: No Action Cost recovery rules: No Action Treatment of benefits/costs from allowance transactions: No Action Action mandating or favoring a particular option: Oklahoma had passed a law requiring coal-fired electric utilities operating in the state to burn a mixture containing at least 10 percent Oklahoma-mined coal. On January 22, 1992, the United States Supreme Court struck down the law, describing it as protectionist and discriminatory (Wyoming v. Oklahoma, No.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Neutral: State Environmental Statute: Wisconsin Act 296, which went into effect on May 2, 1986, ordered the state's five major electric utilities to limit their SO2 by 1993 on an average corporate basis. The act was expected to reduce utility SO2 emissions from over 500,000 tons in 1980 to less than 250,000 tons by 1993.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Pre-approval of particular compliance plans: In Case No. 91-2011-EL-FOR, the Ohio Public Utilities Commission has ordered the state's eight major electric utilities to address CAAA90 compliance plans, including environmental and economic externalities and economic dispatch, as part of integrated resource plans for their 1992 long-range forecast reports.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Pre-approval of particular compliance plans: No Action Lack of Action: In May 1995, in Kansas City Power & Light Company's Case No. EO-95184, the PSC found that it was unnecessary for a decision to be made on the rate-making or accounting treatment for allowance sales.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Pre-approval of particular compliance plans: No Action Lack of Action: N/A CASES: Re Advance Plans for Construction of Facilities, 05-EP-6, Sept. 15, 1992 (Wis.P.S.C.).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Pre-approval of particular compliance plans: No Action Lack of Action: N/A CASES: Re Monongahela Power Co., 130 PUR4th 1 (W.V.P.S.C.1991).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Pre-approval of particular compliance plans: Prompted by requests from Carolina Power and Light and Duke Power, the North Carolina Commission ordered that allowances would be allowed to accrue a carrying charge on those allowances acquired for the purpose of achieving Phase II compliance. This carrying charge is analogous to the accrual charge allowed on cost of work in progress (CWIP). As a result, this action favors allowances. The North Carolina Commission also ordered that no portion of the net investment in allowance inventory would be considered by the Commission for inclusion in the rate base prior to the year 1999.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Pre-approval of particular compliance plans: The Pennsylvania General Assembly passed Act 27, 66 Pa. C.S.A. Section 530 (Supp. 1992) (signed into law by Governor Robert P.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. Re West Penn Power Co., 123 PUR4th 3 (Pa.P.U.C.1991). Lile and Burtraw RFF 98-35 45 TENNESSEE Rate of Return: No Action Cost recovery rules: No Action Treatment of benefits/costs from allowance transactions: No Action Action mandating or favoring a particular option: The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) chose to go with a technology-based compliance plan with scrubbers as the key element in its strategy. Although the TVA system contained some low, average and high SO2 emitters, TVA had three sources that emitted more SO2 than the remaining 23 units (of the 26 total Phase I affected units) combined. As a result, any compliance strategy TVA came up with had to address one of the big three plants (Cumberland 1 & 2, Gallatin 1, 2, 3, & 4, and Paradise 3).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

27. Rico, Renee. 1995. The US Allowance Trading System for Sulfur Dioxide: An Update on Market Experience, Environmental and Resource Economics, 5, pp. 115-129.

28. Rose, Kenneth and Robert E. Burns. 1993. Regulatory Policy Issues and the Clean Air Act: Issues and Papers from the State Implementation Workshops, The National Regulatory Research Institute, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (July). Lile and Burtraw RFF 98-35 9
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Rose, Kenneth, Alan S. Taylor, and Mohammad Harunuzzaman. 1993. Regulatory Treatment of Electric Utility Compliance Strategies, Costs and Emission Allowances, The National Regulatory Research Institute, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (December).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Rose, Kenneth, Robert E. Burns, Jay S. Coggins, Mohammad Harunuzzaman, and Timothy W. Viezer. 1992. Public Utility Commission Implementation of the Clean Air Act's Allowance Trading Program, The National Regulatory Research Institute, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (May).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Rose, Kenneth. 1997. “Implementing an Emissions Trading Program in an Economically Regulated Industry: Lessons from the SO2 Trading Program,” in Market Based Approaches to Environmental Policy: Regulatory Innovations to the Fore, Richard F. Kosobud and Jennifer M. Zimmerman (eds.), New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Soloman, Barry D. 1994. SO2 allowance trading: what rules apply? Public Utilities Fortnightly, September 15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Starting in December 1995, at the request of the Mississippi Power Company, the PSC revised the means by which revenues and expenses are recovered. The costs and gains from allowance purchases and sales are now incorporated into the fuel adjustment clause (FAC) and are now recovered in the same manner as other direct fuel expenses. All moneys continue to be recovered (or rebated) one for one to ratepayers. Treatment of benefits/costs from allowance transactions: The costs and gains from allowance purchases and sales and are recovered (or rebated) one for one to ratepayers through the fuel adjustment clause (FAC).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Through another mechanism, the Illinois Coal Bill (1991), Illinois tried to protect the continued use of Illinois coal by prohibiting a utility from switching fuels, absent commission approval, if the switch would decrease the utility's use of Illinois coal by more than 10 percent. The coal bill specifically mandated the installation of pollution control devices at Baldwin station and a Commonwealth Edison plant. It also provided for a $35 million grant for Illinois Power to support the scrubbing activities. This bill also provided for the inclusion Lile and Burtraw RFF 98-35 21 of pollution control CWIP in the rate base. It is our understanding that the courts ultimately ruled against these statutory directives on fuel use, but these initiatives were an important part of the policy dialogue during the early phase of compliance with Title IV.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Treatment of benefits/costs from allowance transactions: On March 2,1994, the New York Public Service Commission issued an order requiring all allowance moneys be deferred until a generic order is issued. At the time, the Commission was leaning towards revenue rebate and recovery one for one through a fuel adjustment clause (FAC). Another strong point of contention was how to treat allowance swaps and other allowance loans. This contention arose from trades in which the Long Island Lighting Company had been involved with.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

36. Winebrake, James J., Alexander E. Farrell, and Mark A. Bernstein. 1995. The Clean Air Act's sulfur dioxide emissions market: Estimating the costs of regulatory and legislative intervention, Resource and Energy Economics, 17, pp. 239-260.

1. A novel understanding of experimentation in governance: co-producing innovations between “lab” and “field”. (2018). Simons, Arno ; Voss, Jan-Peter.
   In: Policy Sciences.
   RePEc:kap:policy:v:51:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11077-018-9313-9.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Consignment auctions of free emissions allowances. (2017). Burtraw, Dallas ; McCormack, Kristen .
   In: Energy Policy.
   RePEc:eee:enepol:v:107:y:2017:i:c:p:337-344.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Reconsidering Carbon Permits Auction Mechanism: An Efficient Dynamic Model. (2017). Yu, Eden ; Lang, Lihua ; Wang, Mingxi.
   In: The World Economy.
   RePEc:bla:worlde:v:40:y:2017:i:8:p:1624-1645.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Emissions Trading in the Presence of Price-Regulated Polluting Firms: How Costly Are Free Allowances?. (2016). Rausch, Sebastian ; Lanz, Bruno.
   In: The Energy Journal.
   RePEc:aen:journl:ej37-1-lanz.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Electric utility regulation and investment in green energy resources. (2015). Michelfelder, Richard A.
   In: Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment.
   RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:5:y:2015:i:1-2:p:48-64.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Intertemporal links in cap-and-trade schemes. (2013). Slechten, Aurélie.
   In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
   RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:66:y:2013:i:2:p:319-336.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Rethinking Environmental Federalism in a Warming World. (2012). Shobe, William ; Burtraw, Dallas.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:vac:wpaper:wp12-01.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Rethinking Environmental Federalism in a Warming World. (2012). Shobe, William ; Burtraw, Dallas.
   In: Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-12-04.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The SO2 Allowance Trading System: The Ironic History of a Grand Policy Experiment. (2012). Stavins, Robert ; Schmalensee, Richard.
   In: Scholarly Articles.
   RePEc:hrv:hksfac:9368024.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. The SO2 Allowance Trading System: The Ironic History of a Grand Policy Experiment. (2012). Stavins, Robert ; Schmalensee, Richard.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp12-030.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. The SO2 Allowance Trading System and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990: Reflections on Twenty Years of Policy Innovation. (2012). Sweeney, Richard ; Stavins, Robert ; Chan, Gabriel ; Stowe, Robert .
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp12-003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. The Effect of Allowance Allocations on Cap-and-Trade System Performance. (2011). Stavins, Robert ; Hahn, Robert W..
    In: Journal of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/661942.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Intertemporal Links in Cap-and Trade Schemes. (2011). Slechten, Aurélie.
    In: Working Papers ECARES.
    RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/90863.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. The Problem of the Commons: Still Unsettled After 100 Years. (2010). Stavins, Robert.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-10-46.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. The Effect of Allowance Allocations on Cap-and-Trade System Performance. (2010). Stavins, Robert ; Hahn, Robert.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:15854.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Environmental Economics and Modeling Marketable Permits. (2010). Taschini, Luca.
    In: Asia-Pacific Financial Markets.
    RePEc:kap:apfinm:v:17:y:2010:i:4:p:325-343.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Environmental economics and modeling marketable permits. (2010). Taschini, Luca.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:37596.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Incremental and Average Control Costs in a Model of Water Quality Trading with Discrete Abatement Units. (2008). Caplan, Arthur.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:41:y:2008:i:3:p:419-435.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Environmental Law and Policy. (2007). Stavins, Robert ; Revesz, Richard L..
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:13575.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Environmental Economics. (2007). Stavins, Robert.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:13574.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Investment Decisions and Emissions Reductions : Results from Experiments in Emissions Trading. (2005). Gangadharan, Lata ; Croson, Rachel ; Farrell, A..
    In: Department of Economics - Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:mlb:wpaper:942.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring and Investment in Pollution Abatement. (2005). Fowlie, Meredith.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Environmental Economics. (2004). Stavins, Robert.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-04-54.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Environmental Economics. (2004). Stavins, Robert.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp04-051.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Environmental Economics. (2004). Stavins, Robert.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:rffdps:10841.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Lobbying for Emissions Allowances: A New Perspective on the Political Economy of the US Acid Rain Program. (2003). Hanoteau, Julien.
    In: Rivista di Politica Economica.
    RePEc:rpo:ripoec:v:93:y:2003:i:1:p:289-314.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. An Empirical Study of the SO2 Allowance Market: Effects of PUC Regulations. (2002). Arimura, Toshi.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:44:y:2002:i:2:p:271-289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Strategic state-level environmental policy with asymmetric pollution spillovers. (2001). Santore, Rudy ; Robison, David H. ; Klein, Yehuda.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:80:y:2001:i:2:p:199-224.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Sulfur Dioxide Control by Electric Utilities: What Are the Gains from Trade?. (2000). Palmer, Karen ; Cropper, Maureen ; Burtraw, Dallas.
    In: Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:108:y:2000:i:6:p:1292-1326.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Innovation Under the Tradable Sulfur Dioxide Emission Permits Program in the U.S. Electricity Sector. (2000). Burtraw, Dallas.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-00-38.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Sulfur Allowance Trading and the Regional Clean Air Incentives Market: A Comparative Design Analysis of two Major Cap-and-Trade Permit Programs?. (2000). Schwarze, Reimund.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:17:y:2000:i:3:p:279-298.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Electricity Restructuring: Consequences and Opportunities for the Environment. (2000). Heintzelman, Martin ; Palmer, Karen L ; Burtraw, Dallas.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:rffdps:10854.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Innovation Under the Tradable Sulfur Dioxide Emission Permits Program in the U.S. Electricity Sector. (2000). Burtraw, Dallas.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:rffdps:10599.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Voluntary Compliance with Market-Based Environmental Policy: Evidence from the U.S. Acid Rain Program. (1999). Montero, Juan-Pablo.
    In: Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:107:y:1999:i:5:p:998-1033.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Do Lower Prices For Polluting Goods Make Environmental Externalities Worse?. (1999). Brennan, Timothy.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-99-40.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Sulfur allowance trading and the regional clean air incentives market: How similar are the programs really?. (1999). Schwarze, Reimund ; Zapfel, Peter.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:52751.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. The NOx Budget: market-based control of tropospheric ozone in the northeastern United States. (1999). Farrell, Alex ; Raufer, Roger ; Carter, Robert .
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:21:y:1999:i:2:p:103-124.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Endogenous Monitoring and Enforcement of a Transferable Emissions Permit System. (1999). Stranlund, John ; Dhanda, Kanwalroop Kathy .
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:38:y:1999:i:3:p:267-282.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Tradable Allowances in a Restructuring Electric Industry. (1999). Tschirhart, John ; Wen, Shiow-Ying .
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:38:y:1999:i:2:p:195-214.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Heterogeneity, Irreversible Production Choices, and Efficiency in Emission Permit Markets. (1999). McKee, Michael ; Brookshire, David ; Schmidt, Christian ; Burness, Stuart ; Ben-David, Shaul .
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:38:y:1999:i:2:p:176-194.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. New directions in emissions trading: the potential contribution of new institutional economics. (1999). Solomon, Barry D..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:30:y:1999:i:3:p:371-387.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Do Lower Prices For Polluting Goods Make Environmental Externalities Worse?. (1999). Brennan, Timothy J.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:rffdps:10776.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Sulfur dioxide control by electric utilities : what are the gains from trade?. (1998). Palmer, Karen ; Cropper, Maureen ; Burtraw, Dallas ; Carlson, Curtis .
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1966.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. The Sulfur Dioxide Allowance-Trading Program in the USA: Recent Developments and Lessons to be Learned. (1998). .
    In: Environment and Planning C.
    RePEc:sae:envirc:v:16:y:1998:i:3:p:341-361.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Sulfur-Dioxide Control By Electric Utilities: What Are the Gains from Trade?. (1998). Palmer, Karen ; Cropper, Maureen ; Burtraw, Dallas ; Carlson, Curtis .
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-98-44-rev.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. State-Level Policies and Regulatory Guidance for Compliance in the Early Years of the SO2 Emission Allowance Trading Program. (1998). Burtraw, Dallas ; Lile, Ron.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-98-35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Improving Efficiency in Bilateral Emission Trading. (1998). Burtraw, Dallas.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:11:y:1998:i:1:p:19-33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. The Declining Trend in Sulfur Dioxide Emissions: Implications for Allowance Prices. (1998). Montero, Juan-Pablo ; Ellerman, Denny A..
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:36:y:1998:i:1:p:26-45.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. State-Level Policies and Regulatory Guidance for Compliance in the Early Years of the SO2 Emission Allowance Trading Program. (1998). Burtraw, Dallas ; Lile, Ronald D.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:rffdps:10828.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Sulfur Dioxide Compliance of a Regulated Utility. (1997). Fullerton, Don ; Caulkins, Jonathan P. ; McDermott, Shaun P..
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:34:y:1997:i:1:p:32-53.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

51. Sulfur Dioxide Compliance of a Regulated Utility. (1996). Fullerton, Don ; Caulkins, Jonathan P. ; McDermott, Shaun P..
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:5542.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

52. A mixed bag: assessment of market performance and firm trading behavior in the NOx RECLAIM program. (1996). Klier, Thomas ; Prager, Michael Ari ; Mattoon, Richard H..
    In: Working Paper Series, Regional Economic Issues.
    RePEc:fip:fedhre:wp-96-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

53. The US market for SO2 permits : Policy implications of the low price and trading volume. (1996). Conrad, Klaus ; Kohn, Robert E.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:24:y:1996:i:12:p:1051-1059.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

54. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMODITIES MARKETS: MESSY VERSUS IDEAL WORLDS. (1996). McCann, Richard.
    In: Contemporary Economic Policy.
    RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:14:y:1996:i:3:p:85-97.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

55. THE SO. (1996). Burtraw, Dallas.
    In: Contemporary Economic Policy.
    RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:14:y:1996:i:2:p:79-94.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

56. Cost Savings Sans Allowance Trades? Evaluating the SO2 Emission Trading Program to Date. (1996). Burtraw, Dallas.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:rffdps:10682.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

57. Cost Savings sans Allowance Trades? Evaluating the SO2 Emission Trading Program to Date. (1995). Burtraw, Dallas.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-95-30-rev.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

58. Government markets and the theory of the Nth best. (1995). Hahn, Robert.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:57:y:1995:i:2:p:219-234.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

59. The Price of Pollution: A Dual Approach to Valuing SO2 Allowances. (1994). Swinton, John ; Coggins, Jay S.
    In: Staff Papers.
    RePEc:ags:wisagr:200581.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

60. Welfare Effects of Emission Allowance Trading in a Twice-Regulated Industry. (1992). Smith, Vincent H ; Coggins, Jay S.
    In: Staff Papers.
    RePEc:ags:wisagr:200554.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

61. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Report date: 2025-02-21 07:55:07 || Missing content? Let us know