Acemoglu, Daron and Guerrieri, Veronica. Capital Deepening and Non-Balanced Economic Growth. Mimeo: MIT 2006.
Andrade, Gregor, Mitchell, Mark and Stafford, Erik. New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(2) (2001),103-120.
- Arora, Ashish, Fosfuri, Andrea and Gambardella, Alfonso. Markets for technology: the economics of innovation and corporate strategy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bartelsman, Eric J., Randy A. Becker and Wayne B. Gray. NBER-CES Manufacturing Productivity Database. NBER: 2000.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bernstein, Jeffrey I. and Nadiri, Ishaq. Interindustry R&D Spillovers, Rates of Return and Production in High-Tech Industries. American Economic Review, 78 (1988), 429-34.
Bloom, Nicholas, Schankerman, Mark and Van Reenen, John. 2007. Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry. NBER Working Paper 13060.
Carol Corrado, Charles Hulten, and Daniel Sichel. Intangible Capital and Economic Growth. Finance and Economics Discussion Series: 2006-24, April 2006.
- Cohen, Wesley M. and Daniel A. Levinthal. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1990), 128-152.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cohen, Wesley M., Levin, Richard C. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.) Handbook of Industrial Organization, Chapter 18, 1059-1107 (1989) Elsevier.
Cohen, Wesley M., Levin, Richard C.; Mowery, David C. Firm Size and R & D Intensity: A Re-Examination. Journal of Industrial Economics 35(4) (1987) 543565.
Cohen, Wesley M., Levin, Richard C.; Mowery, David C. R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses. American Economic Review 75 (1985) 20-24.
Cummins, Jason and Violante, Giovanni. Investment-Specific Technical Change in the US (1947-2000): Measurement and Macroeconomic Consequences. Review of Economic Dynamics 5(2) (2002) 243-284.
- D Data The NBER patent database, described in detail in Hall et al (2001), classifies patents according to their industry of origin and type of innovation. This involves tracking the industry of origin of each patent, and of the patents that each patent cites, for 16,522,438 citation entries. While data on patents begin in 1963, citations are only available for patents granted since 1975.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Greenwood, Jeremy, Hercowitz, Zvi and Krusell, Per. Long-Run Implications of Investment-Specific Technological Change. American Economic Review, 87(3) (1997) 342-62.
Hall, B. H., A. B. Jaffe, and M. Tratjenberg (2001). The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools. NBER Working Paper 8498. Ilyina, Anna and Samaniego, Roberto M. Technology and Financial Dependence.
Jaffe, Adam B. and Manuel Trajtenberg & Michael S. Fogarty, 2000. Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors. American Economic Review 90(2), 215-218.
Jones, Charles and Williams, John. Measuring the Social Return to R&D, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3) (1998), 1119-1135.
- Jones, Charles. Growth: With or Without Scale Effects? American Economic Review, 89 (2) (1999), 139-144.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jones, Charles. R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy 103 (1995), 759-84.
Kaldor, Nicholas. Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth. in Friedrich A. Lutz and Douglas C. Hague, eds., The Theory of Capital. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1961, 177-222.
Kamien, Morton I. and Nancy L. Schwartz. Market Structure, Elasticity of Demand and Incentive to Invent. Journal of Law and Economics, 13(1) (1970), 241-252.
Klenow, Peter J. Industry Innovation: Where and Why, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 44 (1996), 125-150.
- Klevorick, Alvin K., Levin, Richard C,. Nelson, Richard R. and Winter, Sidney G. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24 (1995) 185-205.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Krusell, Per. Investment-Specific R&D and the Decline in the Relative Price of Capital, Journal of Economic Growth, 3 (1998) 131-141.
- Moore, Gordon E. Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38(8) 1965, 114-117.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nelson, Richard R. and Wolff, Edward N. Factors behind cross-industry differences in technical progress. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 8 (1997), 205-220.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Nelson, Richard R. Modelling the connections in the Cross Section between Technical Progress and R&D Intensity. Rand Journal of Economics 19(3) (1988), 478-485.
Nelson, Richard R., Winter, Sidney. In search of Useful Theory of Innovation. Research Policy 6 (1977), 36-76.
Ngai, L. Rachel and Pissarides, Christopher A. Structural Change in a Multisector Model of Growth. American Economic Review 97(1) (2007), 429-443.
Ngai, L. Rachel and Samaniego, Roberto M. On the Long run Determinants of Industry Growth. CEPR Discussion Paper 6408 (2007).
- OECD. Innovation and Productivity in Services. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2001).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Romer, Paul. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98 (1990), S71-S101.
Rosenberg, Nathan. The direction of technological change: Inducement mechanisms and focusing devices. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 18 (1969), 1-24.
Samaniego, Roberto. R&D and Growth: the Missing Link? Macroeconomic Dynamics 11(5) (2007), 691-714.
- Schmookler, Jacob. Invention and Economic Growth. Harvard University Press (1966).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Terleckyj, Nestor E. What do R&D numbers tell us about Technological Change? American Economic Review 70(2) (1980), 55-61.
- TFP in the model is based on quality-adjusted relative prices of capital goods and the benchmark value of γc. See Cummins and Violante (2002) for details on the construction of the price indices.26 Our measure of R&D intensity is the median ratio of R&D expenditures to sales among firms in Compustat over the period 1950-2000. All firms in Compustat are assigned a 4-digit SIC industry code, which is used for industry assignments. Since firms in Compustat are arguably subject to weak if any financial constraints, this should reflect the pure technologically determined level of R&D intensity for the industry — see Ilyina and Samaniego (2007). We discard the top and bottom 1% of observations in the sample, to reduce the influence of outliers.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
United States Chamber of Commerce. Research & Experimentation Tax Credit. (2008) Last checked: 02/20/2008. http://www.uschamber.com/issues/index/econtax/research.htm Vourvachaki, Evangelia. Information and Communication Technologies in a Multi-Sector Endogenous Growth Model. Mimeo: London School of Economics (2006).
Wilson, Daniel. Beggar Thy Neighbor? The In-state vs. Out-of-state Impact of State R&D Tax Credits. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2005-08 (2005).