Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
create a website

Paying to Make a Difference: Executive Compensation and Product Dynamics. (2006). Falato, Antonio.
In: 2006 Meeting Papers.
RePEc:red:sed006:690.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 56

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. [1] Aggarwal, Rajesh K., and Andrew A. Samwick, 1999, ”The Other Side of the Trade-off: the Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation,” Journal of Political Economy 107, 65-105.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. [10] Bebchuk, Lucian and Yaniv Grinstein, 2005, ”Executive Pay and Firm Size,” mimeo, Harvard University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. [11] Bergman, Nittai and Dirk Jenter, 2003, ”Employee Sentiment and Stock Option Compensation,” Working paper, MIT.

  4. [13] Bernard, Andrew B. and J. Bradford Jensen, and Peter K. Schott, 2003, ”Falling Trade Costs, Heterogeneous Firms, and Industry Dynamics,” mimeo, Yale SOM.

  5. [14] Bertrand, Marianne and Sendhil Mullainathan, 2001, ”Are CEOs Rewarded for Luck? The Ones Without Principals Are,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 901-32.

  6. [15] Bertrand, M. and Mullainathan, S., 2003, “Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences”, Journal of Political Economy, 111, 1043-1075.

  7. [16] Besanko, David , and Ulrich, Doraszelski, 2004, “Capacity Dynamics and Endogenous Asymmetries in Firm Size,” Rand Journal of Economics, 35(1): 23-49 [17] Bolton, Patrick, and David, Scharfstein ,1990, “A Theory of Predation Based on Agency Problems in Financial Contracting,” American Economic Review 80(1): 93—106.

  8. [18] Bolton, Patrick, Jose Scheinkman and Wei Xiong, 2004, ”Pay for Short-Term Performance: Executive Compensation in Speculative Markets,” Journal of Corporation Law, forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. [19] Budd, Christopher, Christopher Harris and John Vickers, 1993, ”A Model of the Evolution of Duopoly: Does the Asymmetry between Firms Tend to Increase or Decrease?,” Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), pp. 543-573 [20] Burkart, Mike, Denis Gromb and Fausto Panunzi, 1997, ”Large Shareholders, Monitoring, and the Value of the Firm”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3): 693-728 [21] Caves, R.E., 1998, ”Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms,” Jornal of Economic Literature, 36: 1947-82 [22] Cohen, W.M., 1995, ”Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity,” in P. Stoneman (ed.): Handbook of Innovation and Technological Change, Oxford, Blackwell.

  10. [2] Aggarwal, Rajesh K. and Andrew A. Samwick, 1999, ”Executive Compensation, Strategic Competition and Relative Performance Evaluation: Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Finance, 54(6), 1999-2043 [3] Anderson, Simon P., Andre de Palma, and Jacques-Francois Thisse, 1992, Discrete Choie Theory of Product Differentiation, Cambridge, MIT Press [4] Bagwell, Kyle, Garey Ramey and Dan Spulber, 1997, ”Dynamic Retail Price and Investment Competition”, Rand Journal of Economics, 28(2), 207-227.

  11. [23] Coles, Jeffrey L., Naveen Daniel, and Lalitha Naveen, 2005, ”Managerial Incentives and RiskTaking, ” forthcoming, Journal of Financial Economics.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. [24] Core, John E., and Wayne R. Guay, 2002, ”Estimating the Value of Employee Stock Option Portfolios and Their Sensitivities to Price and Volatility,” Journal of Accounting Research 40, 613-630.

  13. [25] Daines, Robert, Vinay Nair, and Lewis, Kornhauser, 2005, ”The Good, the Bad, and the Lucky; CEO Pay and Skill,” mimeo, University of Pennsylvania.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. [27] Donaldson, Gordon, 1984, Managing Corporate Wealth, New York, Praeger [28] Doraszelski, Ulrich and Mark Satterthwaite, 2003, ”Foundations of Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: Existence, PuriÞcation, and Multiplicity”, mimeo, Harvard University [29] Dow, James, Gary, Gorton, and Arvind, Krishnamurthy, 2004, ”Equilibrium Investment and Asset Prices under Imperfect Corporate Control,” Forthcoming, American Economic Review [30] Ericson, Richard and Ariel Pakes, 1995, ”Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: a Framework for Empirical Work”, Review of Economic Studies, 62, 53-82 [31] Fershtman, Chaim and Kenneth Judd, 1987, ”Equilibrium Incentives in Oligopoly”, American Economic Review, 77(5), 927-940 [32] Fries, Stephen, Marcus Miller, and William Perraudin, 1997, ”Debt in Industry Equilibrium,” Review of Financial Studies 10(1), 39-67.

  15. [33] Gibbons, Robert and Kevin J. Murphy, 1990, ”Relative Performance Evaluation for Chief Executive Officers,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43, 30-51.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. [34] Gibbons, Robert and Kevin J. Murphy, 1992, ”Optimal Incentive Contracts in the Presence of Career Concerns,” Journal of Political Economy, 100(3), 468-505.

  17. [37] Hall, Bronwyn H., Zvi Griliches, and Jerry A. Hausman, 1986, ”Patents and R&D: Is There a Lag?” International Economic Review 27: 265-83.

  18. [38] Hart, Oliver D., 1983, ”The Market Mechanism as an Incentive Scheme,” Bell Journal of Economics 14, 366-82.

  19. [43] Himmelberg, Charles P., R. Glenn Hubbard, and Darius Palia, 1999, ”Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link Between Ownership and Performance,” Journal of Financial Economics 53, 353-84.

  20. [44] Holmstrom, Bengt, 1979, ”Moral Hazard and Observability,” Bell Journal of Economics 10, 74-91.

  21. [45] Holmstrom, Bengt, and Paul Milgrom, 1987, ”Aggregation and Linearity in the Provision of Intertemporal Incentives,” Econometrica 55, 303-28.

  22. [46] Jensen, Michael, 1986, “The Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow: Corporate Finance and Takeovers,” American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-330.

  23. [47] Jensen, Michael, 2004, ”Agency Costs of Overvalued Equity,” Discussion paper, The European Corporate Governance Institute.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. [50] Jensen, Michael and Kevin Murphy, 2004, ”Remuneration: Where We’ve Been, How We Got to Here, What are the Problems, and How to Fix Them,” Discussion paper, The European Corporate Governance Institute.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. [51] Kedia, Simi, 2002, “Product Market Competition and Top Management Compensation,” mimeo, Harvard Business School [52] Kole, Stacey and Lehn, Kenneth. ”Deregulation, the Evolution of Corporate Governance Structure, and Survival.” The American Economic Review, 1997, 87(2, Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and Fourth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association), pp. 421-25.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. [53] Kovenock, Dan, and Gordon Phillips, 1995, ”Increased Debt and Product-Market Rivalry: How Do We Reconcile Theory and Evidence,” American Economic Review 85(2), 403-408.

  27. [54] Kovenock, Dan, and Gordon Phillips, 1997, ”Financial Structure and Product Market Behavior: An Examination of Plant Exit and Investment,” Review of Financial Studies 10(3), 767-804.

  28. [57] MacKay, Peter, and Gordon, Phillips, 2005, ”How Does Industry Affect Firm Financial Structure?” forthcoming, Review of Financial Studies.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. [58] Maksimovic, Vojislav, 1988, ”Capital Structure in Repeated Oligopolies,” RAND Journal of Economics 19, 389-407.

  30. [6] Bebchuk, Lucian and Jesse M. Fried, 2004, Pay without Performance: the UnfulÞlled Promise of Executive Compensation, Harvard University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. [60] Marris, Robin L., 1964, The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism, London, Macmillan.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. [61] Maskin Eric and Jean Tirole, 1988, ”A Theory of Dynamic Oligopoly, I & II”, Econometrica, 56(3), 549-600 [62] Maskin Eric and Jean Tirole, 2000, ”Markov-Perfect Equilibrium, I: Observable Actions”, mimeo, Harvard University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. [63] Masulis, Ronald W., Cong Wang, and Fei Xie, 2005, ”Corporate Governance and Acquirer Returns, ” Journal of Finance, forthcoming.

  34. [64] Mehran, Hamid, 1995, ”Executive Compensation Structure, Ownership, and Firm Performance,” Journal of Financial Economics 38, 163-185.

  35. [66] Murphy, Kevin J., 1985, ”Corporate Performance and Managerial Remuneration: An Empirical Analysis”, Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 (April): 11-42 [67] Murphy, Kevin J., 1999, ”Executive Compensation,” in Orley Ashenfelter and David Card (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3b, Elsevier Science North Holland.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. [68] Murphy, Kevin, 2002, ”Explaining Executive Compensation: Managerial Power versus the Perceived Cost of Stock Options,” University of Chicago Law Review, 69, 847-69.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. [69] Nikaido, H., 1968, Convex Structures and Economic Theory, New York, Academic Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. [7] Bebchuk, Lucian, Jesse M. Fried and David Walker, 2002, ”Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive Compensation, University of Chicago Law Review 69, 751-846.

  39. [70] Pakes, Ariel and Paul McGuire, 1994, ”Computing Markov-perfect Nash Equilibria: Numerical Implications of a Dynamic Differentiated Product Model”, RAND Journal of Economics, 25(4), 555-589 [71] Pakes, Ariel and Paul McGuire, 2000, ”Stochastic Algorithms, Symmetric Markov-perfect Equilibrium and the ’Curse’ of Dimensionality”, mimeo, Harvard University.

  40. [72] Palia, Darius, 2001, ”The Endogeneity of Managerial Compensation in Firm Valuation: A Solution, ” Review of Financial Studies 14, 735-64.

  41. [73] Philippon, Thomas, 2003, “Corporate Governance and Aggregate Volatility,”Working paper, M.I.T. [74] Raith, Michael, 2003, ”Competition, Risk and Managerial Incentives,” American Economic Review 93, 1425-1436.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. [75] Rauch, James E., 1999, ”Networks Versus Markets in International Trade,” Journal of International Economics 48, 7-35.

  43. [76] Scharfstein, David S., 1988, ”Product Market Competition and Managerial Slack”, RAND Journal of Economics, 19: 147-155 [77] Schmidt, Klaus M., 1997, ”Managerial Incentives and Product Market Competition”, Review of Economic Studies, 64: 91-213 [78] Sklivas, Steven D., 1987, ”The Strategic Choice of Managerial Incentives”, RAND Journal of Economics, 18: 452-458 [79] Titman, Sheridan, and R. Wessels, 1988, ”The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice,” Journal of Finance 43, 1-19.

  44. [8] Bebchuk, Lucian and Oren Bar-Gill, 2003, ”The Costs of Permitting Managers to Sell Their Shares,” Working paper, Harvard Law School.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. [80] Titman, Sheridan, 1984, ”The Effect of Capital Structure on a Firm’s Liquidation Decision,” Journal of Financial Economics 13, 137-151.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. [81] Vickers, John, 1986, ”The Evolution of Industry Structure When There Is a Sequence of Innovations ”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 1-12.

  47. [82] Williamson, Oliver E., 1964, The Economics of Discretionary Behavior: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. [84] Zingales, Luigi, 1998, ”Survival of the Fittest or the Fattest? Exit and Financing in the Trucking Industry,” Journal of Finance, 53(3), pp. 905-38.

  49. CEO is a dummy, where 1 signiÞes that the executive is a CEO in a given Þrm year. Size is assets at the beginning of the year, winsorized at 1%. Industry Þxed effects are at the 2-digit SIC level. Note that I cannot estimate the model with a more disaggregated Þxed effect (e.g., at the level of the Þrm or the executive) because my measure of product differentiation does not vary across executives in a given Þrm or over the time span of data in the sample. Data is annual for 1993-2004, with only manufacturing (SIC 2000-3999) Þrms included. Standard errors are robust to heteroskedasticity and arbitrary serial correlation within industry-year cells.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Following Doraszelski and Satterthwaite (2003), we assume that scrap values are randomly drawn from a distribution F () with E (φi) = φ, independently and identically distributed across Þrms and periods, and privately observed prior to making exit and effort decisions. We let χi (ω, φi) ∈ {0, 1} indicate exit or continuation respectively. With respect to our earlier deÞnition in Section 2, the symmetric MPE now comprises also an operating probability, which for an incumbent is given by ϕi (ω) = R χi (ω, φi) dF (φi) and represents the probability that incumbent i remains in the industry, while for a potential entrant is ϕe i (ω) = R χe i (ω, φe i ) dF (φe i ) and represents the probability that potential entrant i enters the industry.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. High-tech is a dummy variable, where 1 signiÞes that the Þrm is from one of the high-tech industry deÞned by Loughran and Ritter (2004). Percentage Owned is the percentage of common equity held by the executive through stocks and options. Industry Þxed effects are at the 2-digit SIC level. Note that I cannot estimate the model with a more disaggregated Þxed effect (e.g., at the level of the Þrm or the executive) because my measure of product differentiation does not vary across executives in a given Þrm or over the time span of data in the sample. Data is annual for 1993-2004, with only manufacturing (SIC 2000-3999) Þrms included. Standard errors are robust to heteroskedasticity and arbitrary serial correlation within industry-year cells.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Industry Þxed effects are at the 2-digit SIC level. Note that I cannot estimate the model with a more disaggregated Þxed effect (e.g., at the level of the Þrm or the executive) because my measure of product differentiation does not vary across executives in a given Þrm or over the time span of data in the sample. Data is annual for 1993-2004, with only manufacturing (SIC 2000-3999) Þrms included. Standard errors are robust to heteroskedasticity and arbitrary serial correlation within industry-year cells.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Note that I cannot estimate the model with a more disaggregated Þxed effect (e.g., at the level of the Þrm or the executive) because my measure of product differentiation does not vary across executives in a given Þrm or over the time span of data in the sample. Data is annual for 1993-2004, with only manufacturing (SIC 2000-3999) Þrms included. Standard errors are robust to heteroskedasticity and arbitrary serial correlation within industry-year cells. The sample is limited to include only executives that were a CEO in a given Þrm year.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Performance is deÞned as the product of the total inßation-adjusted return to shareholders and the beginning of period market value of the Þrm divided by 100 (Jensen and Murphy (1990)). Industry is deÞned by four-digit SIC code. Position is the ratio of the Þrm’s sales to industry median sales in the beginning of the year, winsorized at 1%. Product differentiation is a dummy variable, where 1 signiÞes that the industry is classiÞed as one with differential products according to Rauch (1999). Industry concentration is domestic four-Þrm concentration ratio.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Performance is deÞned as the product of the total inßation-adjusted return to shareholders and the beginning of period market value of the Þrm divided by 100 (Jensen and Murphy (1990)). Industry is deÞned by four-digit SIC code. Position is the ratio of the Þrm’s sales to industry median sales in the beginning of the year, winsorized at 1%. Product differentiation is a dummy variable, where 1 signiÞes that the industry is classiÞed as one with differential products according to Rauch (1999). Industry concentration is domestic four-Þrm concentration ratio. Size is assets at the beginning of the year, winsorized at 1%. Industry Þxed effects are at the 2-digit SIC level.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Performance is deÞned as the product of the total inßation-adjusted return to shareholders and the beginning of period market value of the Þrm divided by 100 (Jensen and Murphy (1990)). Product Uniqueness is deÞned as selling expense scaled by sales (Titman (1989)). Industry is deÞned by four-digit SIC code. Product differentiation is a dummy variable, where 1 signiÞes that the industry is classiÞed as one with differential products according to Rauch (1999). Industry concentration is domestic four-Þrm concentration ratio. CEO is a dummy, where 1 signiÞes that the executive is a CEO in a given Þrm year. Size is assets at the beginning of the year, winsorized at 1%.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The well-trodden path: Complementing market and entrepreneurial orientation with a strategic emphasis to influence IPO survival in the United States. (2020). Xiang, Kexin ; Patel, Pankaj C ; Feng, Cong.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:110:y:2020:i:c:p:370-385.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Optimal Long-Term Contracting with Learning. (2016). Wei, Bin ; He, Zhiguo ; Gao, Feng ; Yu, Jianfeng.
    In: FRB Atlanta Working Paper.
    RePEc:fip:fedawp:2016-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Valuing restricted stock grants to non-executive employees. (2016). Abudy, Menachem ; Benninga, Simon.
    In: Journal of Economics and Business.
    RePEc:eee:jebusi:v:86:y:2016:i:c:p:33-51.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Rank and file employees and the discovery of misreporting: The role of stock options. (2016). Call, Andrew C ; Rajgopal, Shivaram ; Kedia, Simi .
    In: Journal of Accounting and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:62:y:2016:i:2:p:277-300.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Employee stock option-implied risk attitude under Rank-Dependent Expected Utility. (2016). CASTA, Jean-Francois ; Bahaji, Hamza.
    In: Economic Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:52:y:2016:i:pa:p:144-154.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Why do employees like to be paid with Options?: A multi-period prospect theory approach. (2016). Sun, Lei ; Widdicks, Martin.
    In: Journal of Corporate Finance.
    RePEc:eee:corfin:v:38:y:2016:i:c:p:106-125.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Stocking up: Executive optimism, option exercise, and share retention. (2015). Sen, Rik ; Tumarkin, Robert .
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:118:y:2015:i:2:p:399-430.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Non-executive employee stock options and corporate innovation. (2015). Low, Angie ; Chang, Xin ; Zhang, Wenrui ; Fu, Kangkang .
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:115:y:2015:i:1:p:168-188.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Stock-based Compensation Plans and Employee Incentives. (2014). Zabojnik, Jan.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:qed:wpaper:1325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. CEO optimism and incentive compensation. (2014). Otto, Clemens A..
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:114:y:2014:i:2:p:366-404.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. THE OPTION TO QUIT: THE EFFECT OF EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTIONS ON TURNOVER. (2014). van Wesep, Edward D ; Aldatmaz, Serdar ; Ouimet, Paige.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cen:wpaper:14-06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. CEO overconfidence and dividend policy. (2013). Goel, Anand ; Deshmukh, Sanjay ; Howe, Keith M..
    In: Journal of Financial Intermediation.
    RePEc:eee:jfinin:v:22:y:2013:i:3:p:440-463.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Contracting With Synergies. (2013). Edmans, Alex ; Zhu, John ; Goldstein, Itay.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:9747.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Contracting With Synergies. (2013). Edmans, Alex ; Zhu, John ; Goldstein, Itay.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:9559.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Contracting With Synergies. (2011). Edmans, Alex ; Zhu, John Y. ; Goldstein, Itay.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:17606.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Taxation and the value of employee stock options. (2011). Abudy, Menachem ; Benninga, Simon.
    In: International Journal of Managerial Finance.
    RePEc:eme:ijmfpp:v:7:y:2011:i:1:p:9-37.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Religious beliefs, gambling attitudes, and financial market outcomes. (2011). Kumar, Alok ; Spalt, Oliver G. ; Page, Jeremy K..
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:102:y:2011:i:3:p:671-708.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. (2011). Edmans, Alex.
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:101:y:2011:i:3:p:621-640.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Employee treatment and firm leverage: A test of the stakeholder theory of capital structure. (2011). Wang, Jin ; Bae, Kee-Hong ; Kang, Jun-Koo.
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:100:y:2011:i:1:p:130-153.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Les augmentations de capital réservées aux salariés en France - Employee Equity Issue:Evidence from France. (2011). Alidou, Djaoudath .
    In: Working Papers CREGO.
    RePEc:dij:wpfarg:1110603.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Personnel Economics: Hiring and Incentives. (2010). Oyer, Paul ; Schaefer, Scott .
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:15977.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. New Data for Answering Old Questions Regarding Employee Stock Options. (2010). Olson, Craig ; Hallock, Kevin .
    In: NBER Chapters.
    RePEc:nbr:nberch:10818.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The productivity effects of stock option schemes: evidence from Finnish panel data. (2010). Mäkinen, Mikko ; jones, derek ; Kalmi, Panu ; Makinen, Mikko ; Mikko Makinen , .
    In: Journal of Productivity Analysis.
    RePEc:kap:jproda:v:33:y:2010:i:1:p:67-80.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Optimal exercise of executive stock options and implications for firm cost. (2010). Carpenter, Jennifer ; Stanton, Richard ; Wallace, Nancy.
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:98:y:2010:i:2:p:315-337.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. CEO Compensation. (2010). Jenter, Dirk ; Frydman, Carola.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_3277.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Agency problems in stock market-driven acquisitions. (2009). Jo, Hoje ; Tsai, Shih-Chuan ; Fung, Scott.
    In: Review of Accounting and Finance.
    RePEc:eme:rafpps:v:8:y:2009:i:4:p:388-430.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Neighborhood matters: The impact of location on broad based stock option plans. (2009). Rajgopal, Shiva ; Kedia, Simi .
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:92:y:2009:i:1:p:109-127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field. (2009). DellaVigna, Stefano ; Della Vigna, Stefano .
    In: Journal of Economic Literature.
    RePEc:aea:jeclit:v:47:y:2009:i:2:p:315-72.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. On the Objective of Corporate Boards: Theory and Evidence. (2008). Kwon, Illoong ; Guthrie, Katherine ; Sokolowsky, Jan.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:nya:albaec:08-08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Give everyone a prize? Employee stock options in private venture-backed firms. (2008). Hand, John R. M., .
    In: Journal of Business Venturing.
    RePEc:eee:jbvent:v:23:y:2008:i:4:p:385-404.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. ESO compensation: The roles of default risk, employee sentiment, and insider information. (2008). chang, charles ; Hsu, Ya-Hui ; Fuh, Cheng-Der.
    In: Journal of Corporate Finance.
    RePEc:eee:corfin:v:14:y:2008:i:5:p:630-641.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Sovereign Wealth Funds: Their Investment Strategies and Performance. (2008). Laeven, Luc ; Chhaochharia, Vidhi .
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:6959.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Personnel Economics. (2007). Oyer, Paul ; Lazear, Edward.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:13480.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Corporate financing decisions when investors take the path of least resistance. (2007). Stein, Jeremy ; Baker, Malcolm ; Coval, Joshua .
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:84:y:2007:i:2:p:266-298.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Paying to Make a Difference: Executive Compensation and Product Dynamics. (2006). Falato, Antonio.
    In: 2006 Meeting Papers.
    RePEc:red:sed006:690.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. The Value of Stock Options to Non-Executive Employees. (2006). Hallock, Kevin ; Olson, Craig .
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11950.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Costs of broad-based stock option plans. (2006). Oyer, Paul ; Schaefer, Scott .
    In: Journal of Financial Intermediation.
    RePEc:eee:jfinin:v:15:y:2006:i:4:p:511-534.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Corporate Governance and the Design of Stock Option Programs. (2005). Weber, Martin ; Sautner, Zacharias.
    In: Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications.
    RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:05-32.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Stock Options and Employee Behavior. (2005). Weber, Martin ; Sautner, Zacharias.
    In: Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications.
    RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:05-26.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Stock options and employee behavior. (2005). Weber, Martin ; Sautner, Zacharias.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:mnh:spaper:2645.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Subjective stock option values and exercise decisions : determinants and consistency. (2005). Weber, Martin ; Sautner, Zacharias.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:mnh:spaper:2640.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Corporate governance and the design of stock option programms. (2005). Weber, Martin ; Sautner, Zacharias.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:mnh:spaper:2628.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Why do some firms give stock options to all employees?: An empirical examination of alternative theories. (2005). Oyer, Paul.
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:76:y:2005:i:1:p:99-133.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Accounting, Governance, and Broad-Based Stock Option Grants. (2005). Oyer, Paul ; Schaefer, Scott .
    In: Research Papers.
    RePEc:ecl:stabus:1821r1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Benefits of Broad-based Option Pay. (2005). Inderst, Roman ; Muller, Holger M.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:4878.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Corporate Financing Decisions When Investors Take the Path of Least Resistance. (2004). Stein, Jeremy ; Baker, Malcolm ; Coval, Joshua .
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10998.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Behavioral Corporate Finance: A Survey. (2004). Wurgler, Jeffrey ; Baker, Malcolm ; Ruback, Richard S..
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10863.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Why Do Some Firms Give Stock Options to All Employees?: An Empirical Examination of Alternative Theories. (2004). Oyer, Paul.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Compensating Employees Below the Executive Ranks: A Comparison of Options, Restricted Stock, and Cash. (2004). Oyer, Paul.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Executive Compensation and Short-termist Behavior in Speculative Markets. (2003). Xiong, Wei ; Scheinkman, Jose ; Bolton, Patrick.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:9722.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-21 12:35:37 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.