Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
create a website

Exploring households responsiveness to energy price changes using microdata. (2018). McIntyre, Stuart.
In: Working Papers.
RePEc:str:wpaper:1806.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 30

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Analysis of individual natural gas consumption and price elasticity: Evidence from billing data in Italy. (2023). Grossi, Luigi ; Favero, Filippo.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:118:y:2023:i:c:s0140988322006132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Allan, G., Lecca, P., McGregor, P., and Swales, K. (2014). The economic and environmental impact of a carbon tax for Scotland: A computable general equilibrium analysis. Ecological Economics, 100:40–50.

  2. Baker, P., Blundell, R., and Micklewright, J. (1989). Modelling household energy expenditures using micro-data. The Economic Journal, pages 720–738.

  3. Banks, J., Blundell, R., and Lewbel, A. (1997). Quadratic Engel curves and consumer demand. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4):527–539.

  4. Beckman, J., Hertel, T., and Tyner, W. (2011). Validating energy-oriented CGE models. Energy Economics, 33(5):799–806.

  5. Bernstein, M. A., Griffin, J. M., and Infrastructure, S. (2006). Regional differences in the price-elasticity of demand for energy. National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Böhringer, C. and Rutherford, T. F. (2013). Transition towards a low carbon economy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for Poland. Energy Policy, 55:16–26.

  7. Cho, S.-H., Kim, T., Kim, H. J., Park, K., and Roberts, R. K. (2015). Regionallyvarying and regionally-uniform electricity pricing policies compared across four usage categories. Energy Economics, 49:182–191.

  8. Deaton, A. and Muellbauer, J. (1980). An almost ideal demand system. The American economic review, pages 312–326.

  9. Espey, J. A. and Espey, M. (2004). Turning on the lights: a meta-analysis of residential electricity demand elasticities. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 36(01):65–81.

  10. Fujimori, S., Masui, T., and Matsuoka, Y. (2014). Development of a global computable general equilibrium model coupled with detailed energy end-use technology. Applied Energy, 128:296–306.

  11. Hanley, N., McGregor, P. G., Swales, J. K., and Turner, K. (2009). Do increases in energy efficiency improve environmental quality and sustainability? Ecological Economics, 68(3):692–709.

  12. Hunt, L. C., Judge, G., and Ninomiya, Y. (2003). Underlying trends and seasonality in UK energy demand: a sectoral analysis. Energy Economics, 25(1):93–118.

  13. Igos, E., Rugani, B., Rege, S., Benetto, E., Drouet, L., Zachary, D., and Hass, T. (2015). Integrated environmental assessment of future energy scenarios based on economic equilibrium models. FEEM Working Paper.

  14. Jamasb, T. and Meier, H. (2010). Household energy expenditure and income groups: evidence from Great Britain. University of Cambridge, Faculty of Economics Cambridge.

  15. Kretschmer, B. and Peterson, S. (2010). Integrating bioenergy into computable general equilibrium models – A survey. Energy Economics, 32(3):673–686.

  16. Lecca, P., McGregor, P. G., Swales, J. K., and Turner, K. (2014). The added value from a general equilibrium analysis of increased efficiency in household energy use. Ecological Economics, 100:51–62.

  17. ONS (2007). Office for National Statistics, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Living Costs and Food Survey 2007. UK Data Service, SN: 6118.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. ONS (2008). Office for National Statistics, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Living Costs and Food Survey 2008. UK Data Service, SN: 6385.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. ONS (2009). Office for National Statistics, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Living Costs and Food Survey 2009. UK Data Service, SN: 6655.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. ONS (2010). Office for National Statistics, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Living Costs and Food Survey 2010. UK Data Service, SN: 6945.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. ONS (2011). Office for National Statistics, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Living Costs and Food Survey 2011. UK Data Service, SN: 7272.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. ONS (2012). Office for National Statistics, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Living Costs and Food Survey 2012. UK Data Service, SN: 7472.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. ONS (2013). Office for National Statistics, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Living Costs and Food Survey 2013. UK Data Service, SN: 7702.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. ONS (2014). Office for National Statistics, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Living Costs and Food Survey 2014. UK Data Service, SN: 7992.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Poi, B. P. (2002). From the help desk: Demand system estimation. Stata Journal, 2(4):403–410.

  26. Poi, B. P. (2008). Demand-system estimation: Update. Stata Journal, 8(4):554–556.

  27. Poi, B. P. (2012). Easy demand-system estimation with quaids. Stata Journal, 12(3):433– 446.

  28. Reiss, P. C. and White, M. W. (2008). What changes energy consumption? Prices and public pressures. The RAND Journal of Economics, 39(3):636–663.

  29. Summerfield, A., Lowe, R., and Oreszczyn, T. (2010). Two models for benchmarking UK domestic delivered energy. Building Research & Information, 38(1):12–24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Volland, B. (2017). The role of risk and trust attitudes in explaining residential energy demand: Evidence from the united kingdom. Ecological Economics, 132:14–30.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Revealing the impact of an energy–water–carbon nexus–based joint tax management policy on the environ-economic system. (2023). Han, Dengcheng ; Xie, Yulei ; Liu, Lirong ; Zhang, Jinbo ; Guo, Huaicheng.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:331:y:2023:i:c:s0306261922016543.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Does green policy pay dividends?. (2022). Lamb, Laura ; Hossain, Belayet ; Aziz, Nusrate.
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:24:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10018-021-00317-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The importance of labour market responses, competitiveness impacts, and revenue recycling in determining the political economy costs of broad carbon taxation in the UK. (2022). Swales, Kim ; Katris, Antonios ; Alabi, Oluwafisayo ; Turner, Karen.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:116:y:2022:i:c:s0140988322005229.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Evaluating carbon tax policy: A methodological reassessment of a natural experiment. (2022). Arcila, Andres ; Baker, John D.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:111:y:2022:i:c:s0140988322002201.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The effects of Mandatory Energy Efficiency Policy on resource allocation efficiency: Evidence from Chinese industrial sector. (2022). Yang, Fuxia ; Hong, Yili.
    In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:73:y:2022:i:c:p:513-524.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Predicting Chinas carbon price based on a multi-scale integrated model. (2022). Zhou, QI ; Feng, Shenghao ; Tan, Xiujie ; Cheng, Shihan ; Qi, Shaozhou.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:324:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922010637.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Education Quality, Green Technology, and the Economic Impact of Carbon Pricing. (2021). Patrinos, Harry ; Anthonypatrinos, Harry ; MacDonald, Kevin.
    In: GLO Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:glodps:955.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Education Quality, Green Technology, and the Economic Impact of Carbon Pricing. (2021). Patrinos, Harry ; Macdonald, Kevin ; David, Kevin Alan.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:9808.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Education Quality, Green Technology, and the Economic Impact of Carbon Pricing. (2021). Patrinos, Harry A ; MacDonald, Kevin.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp14792.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Recycling Carbon Tax under Different Energy Efficiency Improvements: A CGE Analysis of China. (2021). Li, Yangyang ; Liu, Tingting.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4804-:d:542998.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Differentiation and Changes of Household Electricity Prices in EU Countries. (2021). Gradziuk, Barbara ; Borawski, Piotr ; Rokicki, Tomasz ; Wojtczuk, Kamil ; Guzal-Dec, Danuta Jolanta ; Kozak, Joanna ; Mrowczyska-Kamiska, Aldona.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:6894-:d:661163.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Impact of Energy Structure Adjustment and Environmental Regulation on Air Pollution in China: Simulation and Measurement Research by the Dynamic General Equilibrium Model. (2021). Guo, Yiming ; Li, Hua ; Deng, Huai ; Wu, Xianhua.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:172:y:2021:i:c:s004016252100442x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Socio-economic impact of a 200 MW floating wind farm in Gran Canaria. (2021). Inchausti-Sintes, F ; Schallenberg-Rodriguez, J.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:148:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121005293.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Energy-food nexus in the marine environment: A macroeconomic analysis on offshore wind energy and seafood production in Scotland. (2021). Yan, Xiaoyu ; Austen, Melanie C ; Papathanasopoulou, Eleni ; Swales, Kim J ; Hooper, Tara ; Qu, Yang.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:149:y:2021:i:c:s0301421520307382.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Energy and Economic Implications of Carbon Neutrality in China -- A Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis. (2021). Adams, Philip ; Peng, Xiujian ; Feng, Shenghao.
    In: Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers.
    RePEc:cop:wpaper:g-318.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The macroeconomic impacts of a universal basic income: an application to Scotland. (2020). McGregor, Peter ; Roy, Graeme ; Kumar, Ashwin ; Eiser, David ; Connolly, Kevin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:str:wpaper:2010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Supply control vs. demand control: why is resource tax more effective than carbon tax in reducing emissions?. (2020). Lin, Boqiang ; Jia, Zhijie.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:7:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-020-00569-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. The regional economic impacts of offshore wind energy developments in Scotland. (2020). Connolly, Kevin.
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:160:y:2020:i:c:p:148-159.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Effectiveness of CO2 taxes on thermoelectric power plants and industrial plants. (2020). Mardones, Cristian ; Garcia, Catalina.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:206:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220312640.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Carbon tax and energy programs for buildings: Rivals or allies?. (2020). Patel, Martin K ; Klinke, Sandra ; Freyre, Alisa.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:139:y:2020:i:c:s0301421519308006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Can energy supply-side and demand-side policies for energy saving and emission reduction be synergistic?--- A simulated study on Chinas coal capacity cut and carbon tax. (2020). Yao, Xilong ; Li, Xiaoyu.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:138:y:2020:i:c:s0301421519308134.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Neutral carbon tax and environmental targets in Brazil. (2019). Garcia, Carolina Policarpo ; Pereda, Paula.
    In: Working Papers, Department of Economics.
    RePEc:spa:wpaper:2019wpecon02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The Effect of Carbon Tax on Farm Income: Evidence from a Canadian Province. (2019). Yiridoe, Emmanuel ; Ochuodho, Thomas O ; Olale, Edward ; Lantz, Van.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:74:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-019-00337-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Can Environmental Tax Policy Really Help to Reduce Pollutant Emissions? An Empirical Study of a Panel ARDL Model Based on OECD Countries and China. (2019). Yu, Zhongfu ; Ning, Jing ; He, Pinglin ; Jin, Hui ; Shen, Huayu ; Xiong, Hao.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4384-:d:257266.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. The environmental benefits and economic impacts of Fit-in-Tariff in China. (2019). Song, Malin ; Wang, Jianlin ; Zhao, Yurong ; Wei, Weixian.
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:133:y:2019:i:c:p:401-410.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Township-based bioenergy systems for distributed energy supply and efficient household waste re-utilisation: Techno-economic and environmental feasibility. (2019). Wang, Xiaonan ; Watson, Ian ; Ascher, Simon ; You, Siming.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:455-467.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Environmental policy and ‘double dividend’ in a transitional economy. (2019). Lin, Boqiang ; Wesseh, Presley K.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:134:y:2019:i:c:s0301421519305348.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Prospective exploration of future renewable portfolio standard schemes in China via a multi-sector CGE model. (2019). Zhang, Yan-Wu ; Lu, Can ; Li, Wei.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:128:y:2019:i:c:p:45-56.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Taxation and the Environment–Health–Poverty Trap: A Policy Experiment Perspective. (2019). Chen, Sumei .
    In: China & World Economy.
    RePEc:bla:chinae:v:27:y:2019:i:1:p:72-92.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Exploring households responsiveness to energy price changes using microdata. (2018). McIntyre, Stuart.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:str:wpaper:1806.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Analysis of Carbon Tax on Selected European Countries: Does Carbon Tax Reduce Emissions?. (2018). Alper, Ali Eren.
    In: Applied Economics and Finance.
    RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:5:y:2018:i:1:p:29-36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Environmental taxation and the double dividend hypothesis in CGE modelling literature: A critical review. (2018). Freire González, Jaume ; Freire-Gonzalez, Jaume.
    In: Journal of Policy Modeling.
    RePEc:eee:jpolmo:v:40:y:2018:i:1:p:194-223.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. How a carbon tax will affect an emission-intensive economy: A case study of the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada. (2018). Liu, Lirong ; Pittendrigh, Scott M ; Baetz, Brian ; Huang, Guohe.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:159:y:2018:i:c:p:817-826.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Re-analyzing the economic impact of a global bunker emissions charge. (2018). Shi, Xunpeng ; Su, Bin ; Sheng, YU.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:74:y:2018:i:c:p:107-119.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Effectiveness of a CO2 tax on industrial emissions. (2018). Mardones, Cristian ; Flores, Belen.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:71:y:2018:i:c:p:370-382.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Assessing the impact of a carbon tax in Ukraine. (2017). Frey, Miriam.
    In: Climate Policy.
    RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:17:y:2017:i:3:p:378-396.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Carbon tax, emission trading, or the mixed policy: which is the most effective strategy for climate change mitigation in China?. (2017). Jia, Zhijie ; Li, Wei.
    In: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.
    RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:22:y:2017:i:6:d:10.1007_s11027-016-9710-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. The effects of carbon reduction on sectoral competitiveness in China: A case of Shanghai. (2017). Tian, XU ; Fujita, Tsuyoshi ; Masui, Toshihiko ; Huang, Zhen ; Geng, Yong ; Dai, Hancheng.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:197:y:2017:i:c:p:270-278.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Investigating carbon tax pilot in YRD urban agglomerations—Analysis of a novel ESER system with carbon tax constraints and its application. (2017). Fang, Guochang ; Liu, Menghe ; Du, Ruijin ; Sun, Mei ; Fu, Min ; Tian, Lixin.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:194:y:2017:i:c:p:635-647.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Impuesto al CO2 en el sector eléctrico chileno: efectividad y efectos macroeconómicos. (2017). Mardones, Cristian ; Muoz, Tamara .
    In: Journal Economía Chilena (The Chilean Economy).
    RePEc:chb:bcchec:v:20:y:2017:i:1:p:004-025.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Reducing Brazilian greenhouse gas emissions: scenario simulations of targets and policies. (2016). Perobelli, Fernando ; de Santana, Luiz Carlos ; de Souza, Kenia Barreiro.
    In: Economic Systems Research.
    RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:28:y:2016:i:4:p:482-496.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Impact of Asymmetric Carbon Information on Supply Chain Decisions under Low-Carbon Policies. (2016). Zheng, Chenshi ; Ji, Jingna ; Yang, Lei.
    In: Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society.
    RePEc:hin:jnddns:1369589.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. A bibliometric analysis of research on carbon tax from 1989 to 2014. (2016). Liang, Qiao-Mei ; Zhang, Kun ; Chen, Hao ; Wang, Qian.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:58:y:2016:i:c:p:297-310.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. The economics of distributed energy generation: A literature review. (2015). McGregor, Peter ; Gilmartin, Michelle ; Eromenko, Igor ; Allan, Grant ; Kockar, Ivana .
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:42:y:2015:i:c:p:543-556.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. The link between green taxation and economic growth on CO2 emissions: Fresh evidence from Malaysia. (2014). taha, roshaiza ; Shahbaz, Muhammad ; Loganathan, Nanthakumar.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:38:y:2014:i:c:p:1083-1091.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Performance de la chaine portuaire et fluxcommerciaux: Cas du Port de Douala. (2014). Pagou, Louis ; Djeuwo, Marcellin ; Mine, Andre Bertrand.
    In: Conference papers.
    RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332561.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-22 19:25:49 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.