A. SACHS AND F. SCHLEER Howell D. R., Baker D., Glyn A., & Schmitt J. (2007). Are protective labor market institutions at the root of unemployment? A critical review of the evidence. Capitalism and Society, 2(1), 1–73.
- Acosta-González E., & Fernández-RodrÃÂguez F. (2007). Model selection via genetic algorithms illustrated with cross-country growth data. Empirical Economics, 33(2), 313–337.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Amable B., Demmou L., & Gatti D. (2011). The effect of employment protection and product market regulation on labour market performance: Substitution or complementarity?. Applied Economics, 43(4), 449–464.
Andersen T. M., & Svarer M. (2007). Flexicurity: Labour market performance in denmark. CESifo Economic Studies, 53(3), 389–429.
Arellano M., & Bond S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–97.
Arpaia A., & Mourre G. (2012). Institutions and performance in european labour markets: Taking a fresh look at evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(1), 1–41.
Baccaro L., & Rei D. (2007). Institutional determinants of unemployment in oecd countries: Does the deregulatory view hold water? International Organization, 61(03), 527–569.
- Baltagi, B. H. (2003). Econometric analysis of panel data (3rd ed.). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bassanini A., & Duval R. (2009). Unemployment, institutions, and reform complementarities: reassessing the aggregate evidence for oecd countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(1), 40–59.
Belot M., & van Ours J. C. (2004). Does the recent success of some oecd countries in lowering their unemployment rates lie in the clever design of their labor market reforms?. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), 621–642.
Blanchard O., & Wolfers J. (2000). The role of shocks and institutions in the rise of european unemployment: The aggregate evidence. Economic Journal, 110(462), C1–C33.
Blundell R., & Bond S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.
Blundell R., & Bond S. (2000). Gmm estimation with persistent panel data: an application to production functions. Econometric Reviews, 19(3), 321–340.
- Born B., & Breitung J. (2014). Testing for serial correlation in fixed-effects panel data models. Econometric Reviews, forthcoming.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Brambor T., Clark W., & Golder M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14, 63–82.
Braumoeller B. F. (2004). Hypothesis testing and multiplicative interaction terms. International Organization, 58(4), 807–820.
Bun M. J. G., & Windmeijer F. (2010). The weak instrument problem of the system gmm estimator in dynamic panel data models. Econometrics Journal, 13(1), 95–126.
Coe D. T., & Snower D. J. (1997). Policy complementarities: The case for fundamental labor market reform. IMF Staff Papers, 44(1), 1–35.
- Elmeskov J., Martin J., & Scarpetta S. (1998). Key lessons for labour market reforms: Evidence from oecd countries’ experiences. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 5, 205–252.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fiori G., Nicoletti G., Scarpetta S., & Schiantarelli F. (2012). Employment effects of product and labour market reforms: Are there synergies?. Economic Journal, 122(558), F79–F104.
Gatu C., Kontoghiorghes E. J., Gilli M., & Winker P. (2008). An efficient branch-and-bound strategy for subset vector autoregressive model selection. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 32(6), 1949–1963.
- Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gwartney J., Lawson R., & Hall J. (2012). Economic freedom of the world 2012 annual report (Technical report). Fraser Institute.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hendry D. F., & Krolzig H.-M. (2004). We ran one regression. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66(5), 799–810.
Howell D. R., & Rehm M. (2009). Unemployment compensation and high european unemployment: A reassessment with new benefit indicators. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(1), 60–93.
Kapetanios G. (2007). Variable selection in regression models using nonstandard optimisation of information criteria. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52(1), 4–15.
Nickell S., Nunziata L., & Ochel W. (2005). Unemployment in the oecd since the 1960s. What do we know?. Economic Journal, 115(500), 1–27.
- OECD (1994). Evidence and explanations, part II – The adjustment potential of the labour market (Technical report). OECD Job Study.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Roodman D. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.
Sachs A. (2012). What really drives unemployment? A bayesian approach to determine the impact of institutions on the unemployment rate. Economics Bulletin, 32(1), 1008–1019.
- Sachs A. (2015). IUnemployment, institutions, and interdependencies: Identifying successful reforms. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 18(1), 34–50.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Savin I., & Winker P. (2012). Heuristic optimization methods for dynamic panel data model selection: Application on the russian innovative performance. Computational Economics, 39(4), 337–363.
- Scarpetta S. (1996). Assessing the role of labour market policies and institutional settings of unemployment: A cross-country study (Technical Report 26). OECD Economic Studies.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Soskice D. (1990). Wage determination: The changing role of institutions in advanced industrialized countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 6(4), 36–61.
- Visser J. (2011). The ictwss database: Database on institutional characteristics of trade unions, wage setting, state intervention and social pacts 1960–2010 (ICTWSS) (Technical report). Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies AIAS.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Winker P., & Fang K.-T. (1997). Application of threshold-accepting to the evaluation of the discrepancy of a set of points. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, 34, 2028–2042.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now