- (xi−yi)i∈S xf −yf = = b  ï£ j (xj − yj)   + j cj(xj) − cj(yj) (xj − yj) + b i∈S 1 − b b + cf (xf ) xi − 1 − b b + cf (yf ) yi (xi − yi) > 0 This condition is stated in Assumption A5. K is closed and convex, and F is strictly monotone under this assumption, so there exists at most one solution (cf. Facchinei and Pang, 2003, Theorem 2.3.3). Combining the results of existence and (at most) uniqueness yields that the solution to the VI is indeed unique. If it satisï¬es the second-order derivative condition, it is the unique equilibrium of the Stackelberg oligopoly problem with a competitive fringe.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- A. A. Kulkarni and U. V. Shanbhag. Global equilibria of multi-leader multifollower games. arXiv:1206.2968, 2013.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- A. Al-Qahtani, E. Balistreri, and C. A. Dahl. A model for the global oil market: Optimal oil production levels for Saudi Arabia. Presented at the IAEE International Conference, Istanbul, 2008. A. F. Alhajji and D. Huettner. OPEC and other commodity cartels: A comparison.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- A. F. Alhajji and D. Huettner. The target revenue model and the world oil market: Empirical evidence from 1971 to 1994. The Energy Journal, 21(2): 121–144, 2000b.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
A. Hortacsu and S. L. Puller. Understanding strategic bidding in multi-unit auctions: A case study of the Texas electricity spot market. The RAND Journal of Economics, 39(1):86–114, 2008.
- A. L. Bowley. The Mathematical Groundwork of Economics : An Introductory Treatise. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1924.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- A. M. Ulph and G. M. Folie. Economic implications of Stackelberg and NashCournot equilibria. Journal of Economics, 40(3–4):343–354, 1980.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
B. Fattouh, L. Kilian, and L. Mahadeva. The role of speculation in oil markets: What have we learned so far? The Energy Journal, 34(3):7–40, 2013.
- Because K is closed, convex and compact, and F is continuous on K, the solution set to the VI is non-empty (cf. Facchinei and Pang, 2003, Corollary 2.2.5). Uniqueness of the solution can be shown through strict monotonicity of F on K, deï¬ned as: (F(x) − F(y)) T (x − y) > 0 ∀ x, y ∈ K, x = y Here, x and y vector elements of the feasible region K.   b j (xj −yj )+b 1− b b+c f (xf ) xi+ci(xi)−b 1− b b+c f (yf ) yi−ci(yi) i∈S b j (xj −yj )+cf (xf )−cf (yf )   T
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
C. Figui`eres, A. Jean-Marie, N. Querou, and M. Tidball. Theory of Conjectural Variations. Series on Mathematical Economics and Game Theory. World Scientiï¬c, 2004. R. Frisch. Monopole – Polypole – La Notion de Force dans l’Economie.
C. Haftendorn and F. Holz. Modeling and analysis of the international steam coal trade. The Energy Journal, 31(4):201–225, 2010.
C. Haftendorn. Evidence of market power in the Atlantic steam coal market using oligopoly models with a competitive fringe. DIW Discussion Paper 1185, 2012.
- C. Ruiz, A. J. Conejo, and R. Arcos. Some analytical results on conjectural variation models for short-term electricity markets. Generation, Transmission & Distribution, IET, 4(2):257–267, 2010.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
D. Huppmann and F. Holz. Crude oil market power – A shift in recent years? The Energy Journal, 33(4):1–22, 2012.
- D. Ralph and Y. Smeers. EPECs as models for electricity markets. IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, pages 74–80, 2006.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- F. Facchinei and J.-S. Pang. Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems, volume I & II. Springer, New York, 2003.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
F. H. Murphy and Y. Smeers. Generation capacity expansion in imperfectly competitive restructured electricity markets. Operations Research, 53(4):646– 661, 2005.
F. R. Aune, K. Mohn, P. Osmundsen, and K. E. Rosendahl. Financial market pressure, tacit collusion and oil price formation. Energy Economics, 32(2): 389–398, 2010.
H. D. Sherali, A. L. Soyster, and F. H. Murphy. Stackelberg-Nash-Cournot equilibria: Characterizations and computations. Operations Research, 31(2): 253–276, 1983.
H. Hotelling. The economics of exhaustible resources. Journal of Political Economy, 39(2):137–175, 1931.
I. Abada, S. A. Gabriel, V. Briat, and O. Massol. A generalized Nash–Cournot model for the northwestern European natural gas markets with a fuel substitution demand function: The GaMMES model. Networks and Spatial Economics, 13(1):1–42, 2013.
- IEA. Oil, Gas, Coal and Electricity – Quarterly Statistics, Volume 2012 Issue 4.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
J. B. Bushnell. A mixed complementarity model of hydrothermal electricity competition in the western United States. Operations Research, 51(1):80–93, 2003.
J. D. Hamilton. Understanding crude oil prices. The Energy Journal, 30(2): 179–206, 2009.
- J. E. Harrington, B. F. Hobbs, J. S. Pang, A. Liu, and G. Roch. Collusive game solutions via optimization. Mathematical Programming, 104(2):407–435, 2005.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
J. L. Smith. Inscrutable OPEC? Behavioral tests of the cartel hypothesis. The Energy Journal, 26(1):51–82, 2005.
J. L. Smith. World oil: Market or mayhem? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3):145–64, 2009.
J. Laitner. “Rational†duopoly equilibria. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95(4):641–662, 1980. T. Lindh. The inconsistency of consistent conjectures: Coming back to Cournot.
- J. Livernois. On the empirical signiï¬cance of the Hotelling rule. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3(1):22–41, 2009.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- J. M. Griffin. OPEC Behavior: A Test of Alternative Hypotheses. American Economic Review, 75(5):954–963, 1985.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
J. Truby and M. Paulus. Market structure scenarios in international steam coal trade. The Energy Journal, 33(3):91–123, 2012.
K. Neuhoff, J. Barquin, M. G. Boots, A. Ehrenmann, B. F. Hobbs, F. A. Rijkers, and M. Vazquez. Network-constrained Cournot models of liberalized electricity markets: The devil is in the details. Energy Economics, 27(3):495 – 525, 2005. D. M. G. Newbery. Oil prices, cartels, and the problem of dynamic inconsistency.
L. Makowski. Are ‘rational conjectures’ rational? The Journal of Industrial Economics, 36(1):35–47, 1987.
M. Hoel. Resource extraction, substitute production, and monopoly. Journal of Economic Theory, 19(1):28–37, 1978.
M. K. Perry. Oligopoly and consistent conjectural variations. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(1):197–205, 1982.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2012.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
P. A. Almoguera, C. C. Douglas, and A. M. Herrera. Testing for the cartel in OPEC: Non-cooperative collusion or just non-cooperative? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 27(1):144–168, 2011.
P. D. Klemperer and M. A. Meyer. Supply function equilibria in oligopoly under uncertainty. Econometrica, 57(6):1243–1277, 1989.
R. Alquist and O. Gervais. The role of ï¬nancial speculation in driving the price of crude oil. The Energy Journal, 34(3):7–40, 2013.
R. F. Aguilera, R. G. Eggert, G. Lagos C.C., and J. E. Tilton. Depletion and future availability of petroleum resources. The Energy Journal, 30(1):141–174, 2009.
R. G. Egging, F. Holz, and S. A. Gabriel. The World Gas Model – A multi-period mixed complementary model for the global natural gas market. Energy, 35 (10):4016–4029, 2010.
R. Golombek, E. Gjelsvik, and K. E. Rosendahl. Effects of liberalizing the natural gas markets in western Europe. The Energy Journal, 16(1):85–112, 1995.
R. Hart and D. Spiro. The elephant in Hotelling’s room. Energy Policy, 39(12): 7834–7838, 2011.
R. K. Kaufmann and B. Ullman. Oil prices, speculation, and fundamentals: Interpreting causal relations among spot and futures prices. Energy Economics, 31(4):550–558, 2009.
S. A. Gabriel, A. J. Conejo, J. D. Fuller, B. F. Hobbs, and C. Ruiz. Complementarity Modeling in Energy Markets. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. Springer, 2012a. S. A. Gabriel, K. E. Rosendahl, R. Egging, H. G. Avetisyan, and S. Siddiqui. Cartelization in gas markets: Studying the potential for a â€Gas OPECâ€.
S. Dibooglu and S. N. AlGudhea. All time cheaters versus cheaters in distress: An examination of cheating and oil prices in OPEC. Economic Systems, 31 (3):292–310, 2007.
S. W. Salant. Exhaustible resources and industrial structure: A Nash-Cournot approach to the world oil market. Journal of Political Economy, 84(5):1079– 93, 1976.
S. W. Salant. Imperfect competition in the international energy market: A computerized Nash-Cournot model. Operations Research, 30(2), 1982.
T. F. Bresnahan. Duopoly models with consistent conjectures. American Economic Review, 71(5):934–945, 1981.
- Tillægshefte til Nationaløkonomisk Tidsskrift, 71:241–259, 1933.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
V. V. Kalashnikov, V. A. Bulavsky, N. I. Kalashnykova, and F. J. Castillo. Mixed oligopoly with consistent conjectures. European Journal of Operational Research, 210(3):729–735, 2011.
W. Lise and B. F. Hobbs. Future evolution of the liberalised European gas market: Simulation results with a dynamic model. Energy, 33(7):989–1004, 2008.
X. Hu and D. Ralph. Using EPECs to model bilevel games in restructured electricity markets with locational prices. Operations Research, 55(5):809– 827, 2007.
Y. Chen, B. F. Hobbs, S. Leyffer, and T. S. Munson. Leader-follower equilibria for electric power and NOX allowances markets. Computational Management Science, 3(4):307–330, 2006.
- Y. Liu, Y. X. Ni, F. F. Wu, and B. Cai. Existence and uniqueness of consistent conjectural variation equilibrium in electricity markets. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 29(6):455–461, 2007.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now