Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment. The case was decided a year after the court had held in Gideon v. Wainwright that indigent criminal defendants have a right to be provided counsel at trial.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment. The case was decided a year after the court had held in Gideon v. Wainwright that indigent criminal defendants have a right to be provided counsel at trial. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 1170034 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 7694 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1122202773 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-04-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1964 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Escobedo v. Illinois, (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1964 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Stewart (en)
  • White (en)
  • Harlan (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Escobedo v. Illinois (en)
dbp:holding
  • If a police investigation begins to focus on a particular suspect, his statements to the police are excluded if he has been refused counsel. (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Stewart, Clark (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Warren, Black, Douglas, Brennan (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
  • U.S. Const. amends. VI, XIV (en)
dbp:litigants
  • Escobedo v. Illinois (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Goldberg (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 172800.0
dbp:subsequent
  • reversed and remanded (en)
dbp:uspage
  • 478 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 378 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment. The case was decided a year after the court had held in Gideon v. Wainwright that indigent criminal defendants have a right to be provided counsel at trial. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Escobedo v. Illinois (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Escobedo v. Illinois (en)
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License