Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, No. 16-980, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States regarding Ohio's voter registration laws. At issue was whether federal law, 52 U.S.C. § 20507, permits Ohio's list-maintenance process, which uses a registered voter's voter inactivity as a reason to send a confirmation notice to that voter under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Help America Vote Act of 2002. If the mail is not returned, the voter is stricken from the rolls, a practice called voter caging. The Court ruled in a 5–4 decision that Ohio's law did not violate federal laws.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, No. 16-980, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States regarding Ohio's voter registration laws. At issue was whether federal law, 52 U.S.C. § 20507, permits Ohio's list-maintenance process, which uses a registered voter's voter inactivity as a reason to send a confirmation notice to that voter under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Help America Vote Act of 2002. If the mail is not returned, the voter is stricken from the rolls, a practice called voter caging. The Court ruled in a 5–4 decision that Ohio's law did not violate federal laws. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 54810537 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 23162 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1053201094 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-01-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2018 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Thomas (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-11 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2018 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Sotomayor (en)
  • Breyer (en)
dbp:docket
  • 16 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Jon A. Husted et al. v. A. Philip Randolph Institute et al. (en)
dbp:holding
  • Both the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Help America Vote Act of 2002, as prescribed by law in , permit Ohio to have a list-maintenance process that removes people from the state's on the basis of inactivity. (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Gorsuch (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Husted v. Randolph Institute (en)
dbp:majority
  • Alito (en)
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:uspage
  • ___ (en)
dbp:usvol
  • 584 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, No. 16-980, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States regarding Ohio's voter registration laws. At issue was whether federal law, 52 U.S.C. § 20507, permits Ohio's list-maintenance process, which uses a registered voter's voter inactivity as a reason to send a confirmation notice to that voter under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Help America Vote Act of 2002. If the mail is not returned, the voter is stricken from the rolls, a practice called voter caging. The Court ruled in a 5–4 decision that Ohio's law did not violate federal laws. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Husted v. Randolph Institute (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Jon A. Husted et al. v. A. Philip Randolph Institute et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License