dbo:abstract
|
- Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, No. 16-980, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States regarding Ohio's voter registration laws. At issue was whether federal law, 52 U.S.C. § 20507, permits Ohio's list-maintenance process, which uses a registered voter's voter inactivity as a reason to send a confirmation notice to that voter under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Help America Vote Act of 2002. If the mail is not returned, the voter is stricken from the rolls, a practice called voter caging. The Court ruled in a 5–4 decision that Ohio's law did not violate federal laws. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 23162 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-01-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, (en)
|
dbp:concurrence
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-11 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
|
- Sotomayor (en)
- Breyer (en)
|
dbp:docket
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- Jon A. Husted et al. v. A. Philip Randolph Institute et al. (en)
|
dbp:holding
|
- Both the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Help America Vote Act of 2002, as prescribed by law in , permit Ohio to have a list-maintenance process that removes people from the state's on the basis of inactivity. (en)
|
dbp:joindissent
|
- Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
|
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Gorsuch (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:litigants
|
- Husted v. Randolph Institute (en)
|
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:otherSource
| |
dbp:otherUrl
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, No. 16-980, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States regarding Ohio's voter registration laws. At issue was whether federal law, 52 U.S.C. § 20507, permits Ohio's list-maintenance process, which uses a registered voter's voter inactivity as a reason to send a confirmation notice to that voter under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Help America Vote Act of 2002. If the mail is not returned, the voter is stricken from the rolls, a practice called voter caging. The Court ruled in a 5–4 decision that Ohio's law did not violate federal laws. (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Husted v. Randolph Institute (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Jon A. Husted et al. v. A. Philip Randolph Institute et al. (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |