Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Samantar v. Yousuf, 560 U.S. 305 (2010), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court concerning whether Muhammad Ali Samatar, prime minister of Somalia under dictator Siad Barre from 1987 to 1990, could be sued in United States courts for allegedly overseeing killings and other atrocities. Samatar then lived in Virginia, and some of his victims had sued him under the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Samantar v. Yousuf, 560 U.S. 305 (2010), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court concerning whether Muhammad Ali Samatar, prime minister of Somalia under dictator Siad Barre from 1987 to 1990, could be sued in United States courts for allegedly overseeing killings and other atrocities. Samatar then lived in Virginia, and some of his victims had sued him under the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991. In a previous decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that the former Somalian government official is not covered by, and therefore not entitled to immunity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. The Court remanded to District Court to determine whether defendant is entitled to common law immunity. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 26422192 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 3384 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1093792382 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-03-03 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2010 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Samantar v. Yousuf, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Thomas (en)
  • Scalia (en)
  • Alito (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2010 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket
  • 8 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Mohamed Ali Samantar, Petitioner v. Bashe Abdi Yousuf, et al. (en)
dbp:holding
  • The FSIA, which provides that a “foreign state shall be immune from the jurisdiction” of both federal and state courts except as provided in the Act, 28 U. S. C. §1604, did not govern petitioner’s claim of immunity. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Samantar v. Yousuf (en)
dbp:majority
  • Stevens (en)
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:uspage
  • 305 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 560 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Samantar v. Yousuf, 560 U.S. 305 (2010), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court concerning whether Muhammad Ali Samatar, prime minister of Somalia under dictator Siad Barre from 1987 to 1990, could be sued in United States courts for allegedly overseeing killings and other atrocities. Samatar then lived in Virginia, and some of his victims had sued him under the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Samantar v. Yousuf (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Mohamed Ali Samantar, Petitioner v. Bashe Abdi Yousuf, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License