About: Yorty v. Chandler

An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Yorty v. Chandler, 13 Cal.App.3d 467 (1970), was a decision by the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District involving how strictly an editorial cartoon needed to be interpreted in lawsuits for libel. It is a significant decision in the case law of applying the First Amendment to editorial cartoons and has been cited as a persuasive authority by other U.S. courts.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Yorty v. Chandler, 13 Cal.App.3d 467 (1970), was a decision by the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District involving how strictly an editorial cartoon needed to be interpreted in lawsuits for libel. It is a significant decision in the case law of applying the First Amendment to editorial cartoons and has been cited as a persuasive authority by other U.S. courts. (en)
dbo:thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Supremecourtofcaliforniamaincourthouse.jpg?width=300
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=12352609016170984983&hl=en&as_sdt=6&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
dbo:wikiPageID	56011352 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	8468 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1091637009 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:California_Courts_of_Appeal dbr:Precedent dbr:Pulitzer_Prize_for_Editorial_Cartooning dbr:Sam_Yorty dbr:San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California dbr:Santa_Barbara_County,_California dbr:Defamation dbr:Democratic_Party_(United_States) dbc:United_States_defamation_case_law dbr:Paul_Conrad dbr:Richard_Nixon dbr:United_States_Secretary_of_Defense dbr:United_States_presidential_transition dbr:Ventura_County,_California dbr:Melvin_Laird dbr:1968_United_States_presidential_election dbr:Los_Angeles dbr:Los_Angeles_County,_California dbr:Los_Angeles_Times dbr:California_superior_courts dbr:Straitjacket dbc:Editorial_cartooning dbr:Editorial_cartoon dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Otis_Chandler dbr:Caricature dbr:Case_law dbr:Republican_Conference_Chairman_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives dbr:Persuasive_authority dbr:Psychiatric_institution
dbp:citations	1970-12-15 (xsd:date)
dbp:concurring	Compton (en)
dbp:court	dbr:California_Courts_of_Appeal
dbp:decisionBy	Fleming (en)
dbp:fullName	Samuel W. Yorty, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Otis Chandler et al., Defendants and Respondents. (en)
dbp:italicTitle	Yes (en)
dbp:judges	Fleming, Roth, Compton (en)
dbp:keywords	Defamation (en) First Amendment to the United States Constitution (en) (en) Editorial cartoon (en)
dbp:name	Yorty v. Chandler (en)
dbp:numberOfJudges	3 (xsd:integer)
dbp:opinions	Editorial cartoons necessarily use "rhetorical hyperbole" to communicate and if no reasonable person would understand the meaning conveyed by the cartoon literally then literal readings of the cartoon cannot be used as the basis of a libel action. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Efn dbt:Inflation dbt:Notelist dbt:Reflist dbt:Rp dbt:Short_description dbt:Infobox_court_case
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_defamation_case_law dbc:Editorial_cartooning
rdfs:comment	Yorty v. Chandler, 13 Cal.App.3d 467 (1970), was a decision by the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District involving how strictly an editorial cartoon needed to be interpreted in lawsuits for libel. It is a significant decision in the case law of applying the First Amendment to editorial cartoons and has been cited as a persuasive authority by other U.S. courts. (en)
rdfs:label	Yorty v. Chandler (en)
owl:sameAs	wikidata:Yorty v. Chandler https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4Y7yb
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Yorty_v._Chandler?oldid=1091637009&ns=0
foaf:depiction	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Supremecourtofcaliforniamaincourthouse.jpg
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Yorty_v._Chandler
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Sam_Yorty dbr:Paul_Conrad
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Yorty_v._Chandler

This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License