Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/3091125.3091330acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Synergistic Team Composition

Published: 08 May 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Effective teams are crucial for organisations, especially in environments that require teams to be constantly created and dismantled, such as software development, scientific experiments, crowd-sourcing, or the classroom. Key factors influencing team performance are competences and personality of team members. Hence, we present a computational model to evaluate proficiency and congeniality of teams based on individuals' personalities and their competences to perform tasks of different nature. With this purpose, we extend Wilde's post-Jungian method for team composition, which solely employs individuals' personalities and gender. We present some preliminary empirical results that we obtained when analysing student performance. Our results show the benefits of a more informed team composition that exploits both competences and personalities of individuals.

References

[1]
J. M. Alberola, E. Del Val, V. Sanchez-Anguix, A. Palomares, and M. D. Teruel. An artificial intelligence tool for heterogeneous team formation in the classroom. Knowledge-Based Systems, 101:1--14, 2016.
[2]
A. Anagnostopoulos, L. Becchetti, C. Castillo, A. Gionis, and S. Leonardi. Online team formation in social networks. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web, pages 839--848, 2012.
[3]
E. Andrejczuk, R. Berger, J. A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, C. Sierra, and V. Marín-Puchades. The composition and formation of effective teams. computer science meets psychology. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.08804, 2016.
[4]
E. Andrejczuk, J. A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, C. Roig and C. Sierra. Synergistic team composition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08222, 2017.
[5]
J. Arnold and R. Randall. Work psychology. Pearson Education Limited., Harlow, England, 2010.
[6]
B. Chen, X. Chen, A. Timsina, and L. Soh. Considering agent and task openness in ad hoc team formation. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2015, Istanbul, Turkey, May 4--8, 2015, pages 1861--1862, 2015.
[7]
R. Fagin, R. Kumar, M. Mahdian, D. Sivakumar, and E. Vee. Comparing and aggregating rankings with ties. In Proceedings of the Twenty-third ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, PODS '04, pages 47--58, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM.
[8]
M. Farhangian, M. K. Purvis, M. Purvis, and B. T. R. Savarimuthu. Modeling the effects of personality on team formation in self-assembly teams. In PRIMA 2015: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems - 18th International Conference, Bertinoro, Italy, October 26--30, 2015, Proceedings, pages 538--546, 2015.
[9]
H. Gardner. The theory of multiple intelligences. Annals of Dyslexia, 37(1):19--35, 1987.
[10]
M. K. Mount, M. R. Barrick, and G. L. Stewart. Five-factor model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human Performance, (11):145--65, 1998.
[11]
T. Okimoto, N. Schwind, M. Clement, T. Ribeiro, K. Inoue, and P. Marquis. How to form a task-oriented robust team. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS '15, pages 395--403. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2015.
[12]
S. S. Rangapuram, T. Buhler, and M. Hein. Towards realistic team formation in social networks based on densest subgraphs. CoRR, abs/1505.06661, 2015.
[13]
M. A. West. Effective Teamwork: Practical Lessons Learned from Organizational Research. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, 2012.
[14]
K. B. White. Mis project teams: An investigation of cognitive style implications. MIS Quarterly, (8(2)):95--101, 1984.
[15]
D. J. Wilde. Teamology: The Construction and Organization of Effective Teams. Springer-Verlag, London, 2009.
[16]
D. J. Wilde. Jung's Personality Theory Quantified. Springer-Verlag London, 2011.
[17]
D.J. Wilde. Post-Jungian Personality Theory for Individuals and Teams. SYDROSE LP, 2013.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
AAMAS '17: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems
May 2017
1914 pages

Sponsors

  • IFAAMAS

In-Cooperation

Publisher

International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

Richland, SC

Publication History

Published: 08 May 2017

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. approximation algorithms
  2. competence
  3. humans
  4. personality
  5. team formation

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract

Funding Sources

  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
  • Generalitat de Catalunya

Acceptance Rates

AAMAS '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 127 of 457 submissions, 28%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 76
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media