Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2488388.2488482acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards realistic team formation in social networks based on densest subgraphs

Published: 13 May 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Given a task T, a set of experts V with multiple skills and a social network G(V, W) reflecting the compatibility among the experts, team formation is the problem of identifying a team C ? V that is both competent in performing the task T and compatible in working together. Existing methods for this problem make too restrictive assumptions and thus cannot model practical scenarios. The goal of this paper is to consider the team formation problem in a realistic setting and present a novel formulation based on densest subgraphs. Our formulation allows modeling of many natural requirements such as (i) inclusion of a designated team leader and/or a group of given experts, (ii) restriction of the size or more generally cost of the team (iii) enforcing locality of the team, e.g., in a geographical sense or social sense, etc. The proposed formulation leads to a generalized version of the classical densest subgraph problem with cardinality constraints (DSP), which is an NP hard problem and has many applications in social network analysis. In this paper, we present a new method for (approximately) solving the generalized DSP (GDSP). Our method, FORTE, is based on solving an equivalent continuous relaxation of GDSP. The solution found by our method has a quality guarantee and always satisfies the constraints of GDSP. Experiments show that the proposed formulation (GDSP) is useful in modeling a broader range of team formation problems and that our method produces more coherent and compact teams of high quality. We also show, with the help of an LP relaxation of GDSP, that our method gives close to optimal solutions to GDSP.

References

[1]
Citeseer statistics -- Most cited authors in computer science. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/stats/authors?all=true.
[2]
A. Anagnostopoulos, L. Becchetti, C. Castillo, A. Gionis, and S. Leonardi. Online team formation in social networks. In WWW, pages 839--848, 2012.
[3]
F. Bach. Learning with submodular functions: A convex optimization perspective. CoRR, abs/1111.6453, 2011.
[4]
L. Backstrom, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and X. Lan. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In KDD, pages 44--54, 2006.
[5]
A. Baykasoglu, T. Dereli, and S. Das. Project team selection using fuzzy optimization approach. Cybern. Syst., 38(2):155--185, 2007.
[6]
A. Beck and M. Teboulle. Fast gradient-based algorithms for constrained total variation image denoising and deblurring problems. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 18(11):2419--2434, 2009.
[7]
T. Bühler, S. Rangapuram, M. Hein, and S. Setzer. Constrained fractional set programs and their application in local clustering and community detection. In ICML, pages 624--632, 2013.
[8]
V. T. Chakaravarthy, N. Modani, S. R. Natarajan, S. Roy, and Y. Sabharwal. Density functions subject to a co-matroid constraint. In FSTTCS, pages 236--248, 2012.
[9]
S. J. Chen and L. Lin. Modeling team member characteristics for the formation of a multifunctional team in concurrent engineering. IEEE Trans. Engineering Management, 51(2):111--124, 2004.
[10]
N. Contractor. Some assembly required: leveraging web science to understand and enable team assembly. Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371(1987), 2013.
[11]
W. Dinkelbach. On nonlinear fractional programming. Management Science, 13(7):492--498, 1967.
[12]
A. Gajewar and A. D. Sarma. Multi-skill collaborative teams based on densest subgraphs. In SDM, pages 165--176, 2012.
[13]
A. V. Goldberg. Finding a maximum density subgraph. Technical Report UCB/CSD-84-171, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley, 1984.
[14]
M. Hein and S. Setzer. Beyond spectral clustering - tight relaxations of balanced graph cuts. In NIPS, pages 2366--2374, 2011.
[15]
M. Kargar and A. An. Discovering top-k teams of experts with/without a leader in social networks. In CIKM, pages 985--994, 2011.
[16]
S. Khot. Ruling out ptas for graph min-bisection, dense k-subgraph, and bipartite clique. SIAM J. Comput., 36(4), 2006.
[17]
S. Khuller and B. Saha. On finding dense subgraphs. In ICALP, pages 597--608, 2009.
[18]
T. Lappas, K. Liu, and E. Terzi. Finding a team of experts in social networks. In KDD, pages 467--476, 2009.
[19]
B. Saha, A. Hoch, S. Khuller, L. Raschid, and X.-N. Zhang. Dense subgraphs with restrictions and applications to gene annotation graphs. In RECOMB, pages 456--472, 2010.
[20]
H. Wi, S. Oh, J. Mun, and M. Jung. A team formation model based on knowledge and collaboration. Expert Syst. Appl., 36(5):9121--9134, 2009.
[21]
A. Zzkarian and A. Kusiak. Forming teams: an analytic approach. IIE Trans., 31(1):85--97, 2004.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)ULTRA: Exploring Team Recommendations in Two Geographies Using Open Data in Response to Call for ProposalsProceedings of the 7th Joint International Conference on Data Science & Management of Data (11th ACM IKDD CODS and 29th COMAD)10.1145/3632410.3632503(547-552)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Finding Densest Subgraphs with Edge-Color ConstraintsProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645647(936-947)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)Local Centrality Minimization with Quality GuaranteesProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645382(410-421)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Towards realistic team formation in social networks based on densest subgraphs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '13: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web
      May 2013
      1628 pages
      ISBN:9781450320351
      DOI:10.1145/2488388

      Sponsors

      • NICBR: Nucleo de Informatcao e Coordenacao do Ponto BR
      • CGIBR: Comite Gestor da Internet no Brazil

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 13 May 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. densest subgraphs
      2. social networks
      3. team formation

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      WWW '13
      Sponsor:
      • NICBR
      • CGIBR
      WWW '13: 22nd International World Wide Web Conference
      May 13 - 17, 2013
      Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

      Acceptance Rates

      WWW '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 125 of 831 submissions, 15%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)ULTRA: Exploring Team Recommendations in Two Geographies Using Open Data in Response to Call for ProposalsProceedings of the 7th Joint International Conference on Data Science & Management of Data (11th ACM IKDD CODS and 29th COMAD)10.1145/3632410.3632503(547-552)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
      • (2024)Finding Densest Subgraphs with Edge-Color ConstraintsProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645647(936-947)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
      • (2024)Local Centrality Minimization with Quality GuaranteesProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645382(410-421)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
      • (2023)Densest Diverse Subgraphs: How to Plan a Successful Cocktail Party with DiversityProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3580305.3599306(1710-1721)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2023
      • (2022)Top-k team synergy problemInformation Sciences: an International Journal10.1016/j.ins.2021.12.101589:C(117-141)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022
      • (2022)Formation of Reliable Composite Teams for Collaborative Environmental Surveillance of EcosystemsSecurity, Trust and Privacy Models, and Architectures in IoT Environments10.1007/978-3-031-21940-5_7(117-132)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2022
      • (2021)A Comprehensive Review and a Taxonomy Proposal of Team Formation ProblemsACM Computing Surveys10.1145/346539954:7(1-33)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2021
      • (2021)Forming Dream Teams: A Chemistry-Oriented Approach in Social NetworksIEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing10.1109/TETC.2018.28693779:1(204-215)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
      • (2021)Peer Learning Through Targeted Dynamic Groups Formation2021 IEEE 37th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE51399.2021.00018(121-132)Online publication date: Apr-2021
      • (2021)A unified framework for effective team formation in social networksExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114886177(114886)Online publication date: Sep-2021
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media