JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Search Results (1 to 10 of 27290 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS

Sort by:

Profiling Clinical Research Activity at an Academic Medical Center by Using Institutional Databases: Content Analysis

Most of the remaining studies presumably had a minimal age of 18 years because fewer than 5% specified an age above 39 years. Most of the studies included geriatric patients (age at enrollment >65 years) because the maximum projected age was ≥75 years in 64%-72% of the studies. Only 5%-12% of studies were focused exclusively on the elderly geriatric defined as minimum age above 65 years.

Aisha Langford, Scott Sherman, Rachel Thornton, Kira Nightingale, Simona Kwon, Deborah Chavis-Keeling, Nathan Link, Bruce Cronstein, Judith Hochman, Howard Trachtman

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2020;6(3):e12813

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Review of Evaluation Metrics Used in Digital and Traditional Tobacco Control Campaigns

methods and traditional evaluation methods.

Lilian Chan, Blythe O'Hara, Philayrath Phongsavan, Adrian Bauman, Becky Freeman

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(8):e17432

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Work Addiction Test Questionnaire to Assess Workaholism: Validation of French Version

In addition to work addiction, the same worker may also suffer from several addictions, such as consuming tobacco, cannabis, or alcohol [1,24]. To our knowledge, no studies have reported acceptability of the English version of WART. The main objective of this investigation was the validation of the French version of the WART to allow its use in current practice. We aimed to evaluate its acceptability, reliability, construct, validity, and external validity.

Hortense Ravoux, Bruno Pereira, Georges Brousse, Samuel Dewavrin, Thomas Cornet, Martial Mermillod, Laurie Mondillon, Guillaume Vallet, Farès Moustafa, Frédéric Dutheil

JMIR Ment Health 2018;5(1):e12

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

A Preliminary Checklist (METRICS) to Standardize the Design and Reporting of Studies on Generative Artificial Intelligence–Based Models in Health Care Education and Practice: Development Study Involving a Literature Review

Recently, a remarkable number of studies investigated the applicability and disadvantages of prominent generative AI-based conversational models, such as Chat GPT, Microsoft Bing, and Google Bard, in various health care and educational settings [1,2,4,28-34]. However, synthesizing evidence from such studies can be challenging owing to several reasons. Variations in methodologies implemented in various studies as well as in the reporting standards is a major limitation.

Malik Sallam, Muna Barakat, Mohammed Sallam

Interact J Med Res 2024;13:e54704

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Crowdsourcing the Citation Screening Process for Systematic Reviews: Validation Study

Systematic reviews (SRs) are often cited as the highest level of evidence available as they involve the identification and synthesis of all published studies on a topic [1]. Moreover, given the rise in the volume of primary literature, clinicians, scientists, and policy makers increasingly rely on SRs to inform decision making on important issues [2].

Nassr Nama, Margaret Sampson, Nicholas Barrowman, Ryan Sandarage, Kusum Menon, Gail Macartney, Kimmo Murto, Jean-Philippe Vaccani, Sherri Katz, Roger Zemek, Ahmed Nasr, James Dayre McNally

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(4):e12953

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Scholarly Influence of the Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum eHealth Initiative: Review and Bibliometric Study of the 2012 to 2017 Outcomes

Its citation analysis, problem specifications, evaluation methods, data releases, software releases and submissions, and participation and benchmark results are addressed. Original text, its enrichment, and submission statistics from the Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF) e Health 2013 evaluation lab. The year of 2013 has been chosen as an example here to illustrate the outcomes of the first year of organizing CLEF e Health evaluation lab.

Hanna Jasmine Suominen, Liadh Kelly, Lorraine Goeuriot

JMIR Res Protoc 2018;7(7):e10961

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Methods to Evaluate the Effects of Internet-Based Digital Health Interventions for Citizens: Systematic Review of Reviews

An example is the Canada Health Infoway Benefits Evaluation Framework based on dimensions of quality, system usage and net benefits, as well as specific indicators [17]. Careful monitoring and systematic evaluations of digital health interventions, however, have been few, in contrast to the proliferation of digital health pilot projects [16]. As a consequence, the current research evidence on which methods should be used to evaluate digital health interventions is still fragmented [3].

Paolo Zanaboni, Patrice Ngangue, Gisele Irène Claudine Mbemba, Thomas Roger Schopf, Trine Strand Bergmo, Marie-Pierre Gagnon

J Med Internet Res 2018;20(6):e10202

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Towards an Adoption Framework for Patient Access to Electronic Health Records: Systematic Literature Mapping Study

This framework should consider patients and informal caregivers as users rather than health care providers alone. This framework would enable the comparison and aggregation of evidence, and provide an overview of any important factors involved, which can then be used as a guide in implementations and health care policies as well as to address the gaps in knowledge.

Hugo J T van Mens, Ruben D Duijm, Remko Nienhuis, Nicolette F de Keizer, Ronald Cornet

JMIR Med Inform 2020;8(3):e15150

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

The Arabic Version of the Mobile App Rating Scale: Development and Validation Study

A total app quality score was calculated as the average of engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality. We also assessed internal consistency as a measure of scale reliability for the items pertaining to the same subdomain of the MARS, as reported in the original MARS study [31].

Marco Bardus, Nathalie Awada, Lilian A Ghandour, Elie-Jacques Fares, Tarek Gherbal, Tasnim Al-Zanati, Stoyan R Stoyanov

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(3):e16956

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Usability Evaluation Methods for Gesture-Based Games: A Systematic Review

This study is a systematic review, explicit and rigorous research that identifies, critically evaluates, and synthesizes relevant studies about a specific subject [10]. The eligibility criteria to identify studies in the primary phase included were (1) games for gestural interaction devices, (2) Kinect and/or Wii as the gestural interaction device, and (3) description of a usability evaluation technique for analysis of user interfaces.

Fernando Winckler Simor, Manoela Rogofski Brum, Jaison Dairon Ebertz Schmidt, Rafael Rieder, Ana Carolina Bertoletti De Marchi

JMIR Serious Games 2016;4(2):e17

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Search Articles

Search Results (1 to 10 of 27290 Results)