High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
[Submitted on 10 Oct 2012 (v1), last revised 25 Jan 2013 (this version, v2)]
Title:Post-LHC7 fine-tuning in the mSUGRA/CMSSM model with a 125 GeV Higgs boson
View PDFAbstract:The recent discovery of a 125 GeV Higgs-like resonance at LHC, coupled with the lack of evidence for weak scale supersymmetry (SUSY), have severely constrained SUSY models such as mSUGRA/CMSSM. As LHC probes deeper into SUSY model parameter space, the little hierarchy problem -- how to reconcile the Z and Higgs boson mass scale with the scale of SUSY breaking -- will become increasingly exacerbated unless a sparticle signal is found. We evaluate two different measures of fine-tuning in the mSUGRA/CMSSM model. The more stringent of these, \Delta_{HS}, includes effects that arise from the high scale origin of the mSUGRA parameters while the second measure, \Delta_{EW}, is determined only by weak scale parameters: hence, it is universal to any model with the same particle spectrum and couplings. Our results incorporate the latest constraints from LHC7 sparticle searches, LHCb limits from B_s ->\mu^+\mu^- and also require a light Higgs scalar with m_h ~123-127 GeV. We present fine-tuning contours in the m_0 vs. m_{1/2} plane for several sets of A_0 and tan(\beta) values. We also present results for \Delta_{HS} and \Delta_{EW} from a scan over the entire viable model parameter space. We find a \Delta_{HS} > 10^3, or at best 0.1% fine-tuning. For the less stringent electroweak fine tuning, we find \Delta_{EW} > 10^2, or at best 1% fine-tuning. Two benchmark points are presented that have the lowest values of \Delta_{HS} and \Delta_{EW}. Our results provide a quantitative measure for ascertaining whether or not the remaining mSUGRA/CMSSM model parameter space is excessively fine-tuned, and so could provide impetus for considering alternative SUSY models.
Submission history
From: Azar Mustafayev [view email][v1] Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:59:25 UTC (1,342 KB)
[v2] Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:36:57 UTC (2,638 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.