Astrophysics > High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
[Submitted on 7 Mar 2018 (v1), last revised 26 Jun 2018 (this version, v2)]
Title:Observational implications of lowering the LIGO-Virgo alert threshold
View PDFAbstract:The recent detection of the binary-neutron-star merger associated with GW170817 by both LIGO-Virgo and the network of electromagnetic-spectrum observing facilities around the world has made the multi-messenger detection of gravitational-wave events a reality. These joint detections allow us to probe gravitational-wave sources in greater detail and provide us with the possibility of confidently establishing events that would not have been detected in gravitational-wave data alone. In this paper, we explore the prospects of using the electromagnetic follow-up of low-significance gravitational-wave event candidates to increase the sample of confident detections with electromagnetic counterparts. We find that the gravitational-wave alert threshold change that would roughly double the number of detectable astrophysical events would increase the false-alarm rate by more than 5 orders of magnitude from 1 per 100 years to more than 1000 per year. We find that the localization costs of following-up low-significance candidates are marginal, as the same changes to false-alarm rate only increase distance/area localizations by less than a factor of 2 and increase volume localization by less than a factor of 4. We argue that EM follow-up thresholds for low-significance candidates should be set on the basis of alert purity ($P_\text{astro}$) and not false-alarm rate. Ideally, such estimates of $P_\text{astro}$ would be provided by LIGO-Virgo, but in their absence we provide estimates of the average purity of the gravitational-wave candidate alerts issued by LIGO-Virgo as a function of false-alarm rate for various LIGO-Virgo observing epochs.
Submission history
From: Ryan Lynch [view email][v1] Wed, 7 Mar 2018 21:20:02 UTC (713 KB)
[v2] Tue, 26 Jun 2018 22:27:00 UTC (269 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.HE
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.