Computer Science > Data Structures and Algorithms
[Submitted on 8 May 2018 (this version), latest version 6 Oct 2018 (v2)]
Title:Dichotomy Results for Classified Rank-Maximal Matchings and Popular Matchings
View PDFAbstract:In this paper, we consider the problem of computing an optimal matching in a bipartite graph where elements of one side of the bipartition specify preferences over the other side, and one or both sides can have capacities and classifications. The input instance is a bipartite graph G=(A U P,E), where A is a set of applicants, P is a set of posts, and each applicant ranks its neighbors in an order of preference, possibly involving ties. Moreover, each vertex v belonging to A U P has a quota q(v) denoting the maximum number of partners it can have in any allocation of applicants to posts -- referred to as a matching in this paper. A classification $\mathcal{C}_u$ for a vertex $u$ is a collection of subsets of neighbors of $u$. Each subset (class) $C\in \mathcal{C}_u$ has an upper quota denoting the maximum number of vertices from $C$ that can be matched to $u$. The goal is to find a matching that is optimal amongst all the feasible matchings, which are matchings that respect quotas of all the vertices and classes.
We consider two well-studied notions of optimality namely popularity and rank-maximality. We present an O(|E|^2)-time algorithm for finding a feasible rank-maximal matching, when each classification is a laminar family. We complement this with an NP-hardness result when classes are non-laminar even under strict preference lists, and even when only posts have classifications, and each applicant has a quota of one.
We show an analogous dichotomy result for computing a popular matching amongst feasible matchings (if one exists) where applicants having a quota of one.
En-route to designing the polynomial time algorithms, we adapt the well-known Dulmage Mendelsohn decomposition of a bipartite graph w.r.t. a maximum matching to a maximum flow on special flow networks. We believe this generalization is of independent interest.
Submission history
From: Meghana Nasre Ms. [view email][v1] Tue, 8 May 2018 06:16:23 UTC (28 KB)
[v2] Sat, 6 Oct 2018 05:57:10 UTC (31 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.