Computer Science > Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing
[Submitted on 21 Jun 2018 (this version), latest version 19 Nov 2019 (v3)]
Title:GPOP: A cache- and work-efficient framework for Graph Processing Over Partitions
View PDFAbstract:The past decade has seen development of many shared-memory graph processing frameworks intended to reduce the effort for creating high performance parallel applications. However, their programming models, based on Vertex-centric or Edge-centric paradigms suffer from several issues, such as poor cache utilization, irregular memory accesses, heavy use of synchronization primitives or theoretical inefficiency, that deteriorate the performance and scalability of applications.
Recently, a cache-efficient partition-centric paradigm was proposed for computing PageRank. In this paper, we generalize this approach to develop a novel Partition-centric Programming Model(PPM) that is cache-efficient, scalable and work-efficient. We implement PPM as part of Graph Processing over Partitions(GPOP) framework that can efficiently execute a variety of algorithms. GPOP dramatically improves the cache performance by exploiting locality of partitioning. It achieves high scalability by enabling completely lock and atomic free computation. Its built-in analytical performance models enable it to use a hybrid of source and destination centric communication modes in a way that ensures work-efficiency of each iteration and simultaneously boosts high bandwidth sequential memory accesses. GPOP framework completely abstracts away underlying parallelism and programming model details from the user. It provides an easy to program set of APIs with the ability to selectively continue the active vertex set across iterations, which is not intrinsically supported by the current frameworks.
We extensively evaluate the performance of GPOP for a variety of graph algorithms, using several large datasets. We observe that GPOP incurs upto 8.6x and 5.2x less L2 cache misses compared to Ligra and GraphMat, respectively. In terms of execution time, GPOP is upto 19x and 6.1x faster than Ligra and GraphMat, respectively.
Submission history
From: Kartik Lakhotia [view email][v1] Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:19:54 UTC (2,033 KB)
[v2] Tue, 1 Jan 2019 04:58:56 UTC (4,946 KB)
[v3] Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:40:49 UTC (1,940 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.