Computer Science > Data Structures and Algorithms
[Submitted on 25 Oct 2018 (v1), last revised 11 Mar 2021 (this version, v2)]
Title:A Deamortization Approach for Dynamic Spanner and Dynamic Maximal Matching
View PDFAbstract:Many dynamic graph algorithms have an amortized update time, rather than a stronger worst-case guarantee. But amortized data structures are not suitable for real-time systems, where each individual operation has to be executed quickly. For this reason, there exist many recent randomized results that aim to provide a guarantee stronger than amortized expected. The strongest possible guarantee for a randomized algorithm is that it is always correct (Las Vegas), and has high-probability worst-case update time, which gives a bound on the time for each individual operation that holds with high probability.
In this paper we present the first polylogarithmic high-probability worst-case time bounds for the dynamic spanner and the dynamic maximal matching problem. 1. For dynamic spanner, the only known $o(n)$ worst-case bounds were $O(n^{3/4})$ high-probability worst-case update time for maintaining a 3-spanner and $O(n^{5/9})$ for maintaining a 5-spanner. We give a $O(1)^k \log^3(n)$ high-probability worst-case time bound for maintaining a $(2k-1)$-spanner, which yields the first worst-case polylog update time for all constant $k$. (All the results above maintain the optimal tradeoff of stretch $2k-1$ and $\tilde{O}(n^{1+1/k})$ edges.) 2. For dynamic maximal matching, or dynamic $2$-approximate maximum matching, no algorithm with $o(n)$ worst-case time bound was known and we present an algorithm with $O(\log^5(n))$ high-probability worst-case time; similar worst-case bounds existed only for maintaining a matching that was $(2+\epsilon)$-approximate, and hence not maximal.
Our results are achieved using a new black-box reduction that converts any data structure with worst-case expected update time into one with a high-probability worst-case update time: the query time remains the same, while the update time increases by a factor of $O(\log^2(n))$.
Submission history
From: Sebastian Forster [view email][v1] Thu, 25 Oct 2018 15:37:58 UTC (50 KB)
[v2] Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:35:42 UTC (180 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.