Computer Science > Computer Science and Game Theory
[Submitted on 3 Feb 2020 (v1), revised 13 Feb 2021 (this version, v3), latest version 12 Jun 2022 (v6)]
Title:The Price of Incentivizing Exploration: A Characterization via Thompson Sampling and Sample Complexity
View PDFAbstract:We consider incentivized exploration: a version of multi-armed bandits where the choice of arms is controlled by self-interested agents, and the algorithm can only issue recommendations. The algorithm controls the flow of information, and the information asymmetry can incentivize the agents to explore. Prior work achieves optimal regret rates up to multiplicative factors that become arbitrarily large depending on the Bayesian priors, and scale exponentially in the number of arms. A more basic problem of sampling each arm once runs into similar factors.
We focus on the price of incentives: the loss in performance, broadly construed, incurred for the sake of incentive-compatibility. We prove that Thompson Sampling, a standard bandit algorithm, is incentive-compatible if initialized with sufficiently many data points. The performance loss due to incentives is therefore limited to the initial rounds when these data points are collected. The problem is largely reduced to that of sample complexity: how many rounds are needed? We address this question, providing matching upper and lower bounds and instantiating them in various corollaries. Typically, the optimal sample complexity is polynomial in the number of arms and exponential in the "strength of beliefs".
Submission history
From: Mark Sellke [view email][v1] Mon, 3 Feb 2020 04:58:51 UTC (31 KB)
[v2] Wed, 8 Apr 2020 02:59:53 UTC (36 KB)
[v3] Sat, 13 Feb 2021 19:43:52 UTC (162 KB)
[v4] Sat, 5 Jun 2021 04:13:51 UTC (102 KB)
[v5] Fri, 13 Aug 2021 21:26:00 UTC (177 KB)
[v6] Sun, 12 Jun 2022 19:54:20 UTC (188 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.GT
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.