Mathematics > Optimization and Control
[Submitted on 13 Aug 2020 (this version), latest version 29 May 2021 (v2)]
Title:Conservative Stochastic Optimization with Expectation Constraints
View PDFAbstract:This paper considers stochastic convex optimization problems where the objective and constraint functions involve expectations with respect to the data indices or environmental variables, in addition to deterministic convex constraints on the domain of the variables. Although the setting is generic and arises in different machine learning applications, online and efficient approaches for solving such problems have not been widely studied. Since the underlying data distribution is unknown a priori, a closed-form solution is generally not available, and classical deterministic optimization paradigms are not applicable. State-of-the-art approaches, such as those using the saddle point framework, can ensure that the optimality gap as well as the constraint violation decay as $Ø\left(T^{-\frac{1}{2}}\right)$ where $T$ is the number of stochastic gradients. The domain constraints are assumed simple and handled via projection at every iteration. In this work, we propose a novel conservative stochastic optimization algorithm (CSOA) that achieves zero constraint violation and $Ø\left(T^{-\frac{1}{2}}\right)$ optimality gap.
Further, the projection operation (for scenarios when calculating projection is expensive) in the proposed algorithm can be avoided by considering the conditional gradient or Frank-Wolfe (FW) variant of the algorithm. The state-of-the-art stochastic FW variants achieve an optimality gap of $Ø\left(T^{-\frac{1}{3}}\right)$ after $T$ iterations, though these algorithms have not been applied to problems with functional expectation constraints. In this work, we propose the FW-CSOA algorithm that is not only projection-free but also achieves zero constraint violation with $Ø\left(T^{-\frac{1}{4}}\right)$ decay of the optimality gap. The efficacy of the proposed algorithms is tested on two relevant problems: fair classification and structured matrix completion.
Submission history
From: Amrit Singh Bedi [view email][v1] Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:56:24 UTC (828 KB)
[v2] Sat, 29 May 2021 05:32:29 UTC (3,232 KB)
Current browse context:
math.OC
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.