Computer Science > Machine Learning
[Submitted on 12 Feb 2021 (v1), last revised 28 Nov 2022 (this version, v8)]
Title:Two Sides of the Same Coin: Heterophily and Oversmoothing in Graph Convolutional Neural Networks
View PDFAbstract:In node classification tasks, graph convolutional neural networks (GCNs) have demonstrated competitive performance over traditional methods on diverse graph data. However, it is known that the performance of GCNs degrades with increasing number of layers (oversmoothing problem) and recent studies have also shown that GCNs may perform worse in heterophilous graphs, where neighboring nodes tend to belong to different classes (heterophily problem). These two problems are usually viewed as unrelated, and thus are studied independently, often at the graph filter level from a spectral perspective.
We are the first to take a unified perspective to jointly explain the oversmoothing and heterophily problems at the node level. Specifically, we profile the nodes via two quantitative metrics: the relative degree of a node (compared to its neighbors) and the node-level heterophily. Our theory shows that the interplay of these two profiling metrics defines three cases of node behaviors, which explain the oversmoothing and heterophily problems jointly and can predict the performance of GCNs. Based on insights from our theory, we show theoretically and empirically the effectiveness of two strategies: structure-based edge correction, which learns corrected edge weights from structural properties (i.e., degrees), and feature-based edge correction, which learns signed edge weights from node features. Compared to other approaches, which tend to handle well either heterophily or oversmoothing, we show that {our model, GGCN}, which incorporates the two strategies performs well in both problems.
Submission history
From: Yujun Yan [view email][v1] Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:52:34 UTC (1,802 KB)
[v2] Wed, 24 Feb 2021 21:18:10 UTC (1,803 KB)
[v3] Sat, 3 Jul 2021 02:26:57 UTC (2,040 KB)
[v4] Thu, 28 Oct 2021 23:22:08 UTC (2,113 KB)
[v5] Wed, 24 Nov 2021 05:29:57 UTC (2,108 KB)
[v6] Tue, 15 Feb 2022 18:58:03 UTC (3,866 KB)
[v7] Tue, 4 Oct 2022 08:24:01 UTC (3,866 KB)
[v8] Mon, 28 Nov 2022 16:08:41 UTC (3,868 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.