Astrophysics > Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
[Submitted on 4 Mar 2021 (this version), latest version 28 Jun 2021 (v2)]
Title:Strong lens modelling: comparing and combining Bayesian neural networks and parametric profile fitting
View PDFAbstract:The vast quantity of strong galaxy-galaxy gravitational lenses expected by future large-scale surveys necessitates the development of automated methods to efficiently model their mass profiles. For this purpose, we train an approximate Bayesian convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict mass profile parameters and associated uncertainties, and compare its accuracy to that of conventional parametric modelling for a range of increasingly complex lensing systems. These include standard smooth parametric density profiles, hydrodynamical EAGLE galaxies and the inclusion of foreground mass structures, combined with parametric sources and sources extracted from the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. In addition, we also present a method for combining the CNN with traditional parametric density profile fitting where the CNN provides initial priors on the latter's parameters. Across the test sets of images, the CNN achieved errors 19 $\pm$ 22 per cent lower than the traditional method's blind modelling. Using these CNN-predicted parameters as priors for this method to use in an automated fashion instead achieved 27 $\pm$ 11 per cent lower errors over the latter. This was reduced further to 37 $\pm$ 11 per cent when also incorporating the CNN-predicted uncertainties into the priors, helping it to avoid local minima in parameter space, with errors also 17 $\pm$ 21 per cent lower than the CNN by itself. While the CNN is undoubtedly the fastest modelling method, the combination of the two increases the speed of conventional fitting alone by a factor of 1.73 and 1.19 with and without CNN-predicted uncertainties, respectively. This, combined with greatly improved accuracy, highlights the benefits one can obtain through combining neural networks with conventional techniques in order to achieve an efficient automated modelling approach.
Submission history
From: James Pearson [view email][v1] Thu, 4 Mar 2021 19:00:02 UTC (4,106 KB)
[v2] Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:51:14 UTC (11,603 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.IM
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.