Nuclear Theory
[Submitted on 25 Aug 2022 (v1), revised 12 Sep 2022 (this version, v2), latest version 25 Sep 2023 (v4)]
Title:Sensitivity of Au+Au collisions to the symmetric nuclear matter equation of state at 2 -- 5 nuclear saturation densities
View PDFAbstract:We demonstrate that proton and pion flow measurements in heavy-ion collisions at incident energies ranging from 1 to 20 GeV per nucleon in the fixed target frame, $E_{lab} \in [1, 20]$ AGeV, potentially allow for an accurate determination of the symmetric nuclear matter equation of state at 2 -- 4 $n_0$. We simulate Au+Au collisions at these energies using a hadronic transport model with an adjustable vector mean-field potential dependent on baryon density $n_B$. The mean field is parametrized to reproduce a given density-dependence of the speed of sound at zero temperature $c_s^2(n_B, T = 0)$, which is varied independently in multiple density intervals to probe the differential sensitivity of heavy-ion observables to the EOS at these specific densities. The sensitivity of flow, especially the slope of the directed flow, to the EOS at $n_B \in (2,3)n_0$ and $n_B \in (3,4)n_0$ is shown to be high and to peak around $E_{lab} \in[4,8]$ AGeV, which is within the range covered by the E895 experiment and, more recently, by the Beam Energy Scan II at RHIC. In agreement with previous works on this subject, we cannot describe the E895 data: the measurements of the slope of the directed flow are reproduced by a softer equation of state, while describing the elliptic flow data requires a harder equation of state. However, a newer set of proton flow data from the STAR experiment (in disagreement with the older E895 data) is described well by our model and leads to posterior values of $c_s^2[n_B \in (2,3)n_0] = 0.47\pm 0.12$, $c_s^2[n_B \in (3,4)n_0] = -0.08 \pm 0.14$, thus indicating a hard equation of state at $n_B \in (2,3) n_0$ and a possible phase transition at $n_B \in (3,4) n_0$. More data at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} \in [3, 5]$ GeV, as well as a more thorough analysis of the model systematic uncertainties will be necessary for a more precise conclusion.
Submission history
From: Dmytro Oliinychenko [view email][v1] Thu, 25 Aug 2022 10:57:41 UTC (1,648 KB)
[v2] Mon, 12 Sep 2022 05:45:45 UTC (1,913 KB)
[v3] Sat, 16 Sep 2023 07:41:25 UTC (1,335 KB)
[v4] Mon, 25 Sep 2023 14:17:09 UTC (1,335 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.