High Energy Physics - Experiment
[Submitted on 17 Oct 2022]
Title:Through Iron & Ice: Searching for Sterile Neutrinos at the IceCube Neutrino Observatory
View PDFAbstract:Despite the rapid progression in our understanding of neutrinos over the last half century, much is left unknown about their properties. This leaves neutrinos as the most promising portal for Beyond Standard Model (BSM) physics, and neutrinos have already provided fruitful surprises.
A number of neutrino experiments in the last three decades have observed anomalous oscillation signals consistent with a mass-squared splitting of $\Delta m^2 \sim 1\ \textrm{eV}^2$, motivating the existence and search for sterile neutrinos. On the other hand, other experiments have failed to see such a signal.
In this thesis, we present two analyses. The first is an update to the sterile neutrino global fits with the inclusion of recent experimental data. We find that the 3+1 model provides a better fit to the global data set compared to the null, with an improvement of $\Delta \chi^2 = 51$ with the addition of only 3 degrees of freedom, corresponding to $6.6\sigma$. While a substantial improvement, we also find a irreconcilable tension between the data sets of $5.1\sigma$, calculated using the parameter goodness-of-fit test. This motivates the exploration of expanded models: a 3+2 model, and a 3+1+Decay model. In the 3+2 model, we find negligible improvement to the fit, and an even worse tension of $5.5\sigma$. In the more exotic 3+1+Decay model, we find the tension reduced to $3.6\sigma$. While a substantial improvement compared to the 3+1 model with the introduction of only one additional parameter, the tension is still too large to assuage concerns.
The second analysis is the results of an expanded IceCube sterile neutrino search. A previous sterile neutrino search found no evidence for sterile neutrinos, finding a p-value of 8%. Of the three sterile mixing angles, $\theta_{14}, \theta_{24}$, and $\theta_{34}$, only $\theta_{24}$ was fitted for, as $\theta_{14}$ was negligible and $\theta_{34} = 0$ was considered a conservative assumption. We present results of an analysis where we include $\theta_{34}$ to the fitted model. Both a frequentist and Bayesian analysis were conducted, with fits done in terms of the mass-squared splitting $\Delta m_{41}^2$ and the mixing matrix parameters $|U_{\mu4}|^2$ and $|U_{\tau4}|^2$. The frequentist analysis finds a best fit at $\Delta m_{41}^2 = 5.0\ \textrm{eV}^2$, $|U_{\mu4}|^2 = 0.04$, and $|U_{\tau4}|^2 = 0.006$, with a p-value of 5.2% assuming Wilks' Theorem with 3 degrees of freedom. Pseudoexperiments are indicating a smaller p-value 2.7%. The Bayesian analysis finds a similar best fit point at $\Delta m_{41}^2 = 5.0\ \textrm{eV}^2$, $|U_{\mu4}|^2 = 0.02$, and $|U_{\tau4}|^2 = 0.006$, with a Bayes factor indicating a ``Very Strong'' preference for this sterile hypothesis over the null hypothesis.
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.