Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Astrophysics > Earth and Planetary Astrophysics

arXiv:2211.08490 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 15 Nov 2022]

Title:A systematic validation of hot Neptunes in TESS data

Authors:Christian Magliano, Giovanni Covone, Richa Dobal, Luca Cacciapuoti, Luca Tonietti, Steven Giacalone, Jose I.Vines, Laura Inno, James S. Jenkins, Jack J. Lissauer, Allyson Bieryla, Fabrizio Oliva, Isabella Pagano, Veselin Kostov, Carl Ziegler, David R. Ciardi, Erica J. Gonzales, Courtney D. Dressing, Lars A. Buchhave, Steve B. Howell, Rachel A. Matson, Elisabeth Matthews, Alessandra Rotundi, Douglas Alves, Stefano Fiscale, Riccardo M.Ienco, Pablo Pena, Francesco Gallo, Maria T.Muscari Tomajoli
View PDF
Abstract:We statistically validated a sample of hot Neptune candidates applying a two-step vetting technique using DAVE and TRICERATOPS. We performed a systematic validation of 250 transit-like events in the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) archive in the parameter region defined by $P\leq 4$ d and $3R_\oplus\leq R\leq 5R_\oplus$. Through our analysis, we identified 18 hot Neptune-sized candidates, with a false positive probability $<50\%$. Nine of these planet candidates still need to be confirmed. For each of the nine targets we retrieved the stellar parameters using ARIADNE and derived constraints on the planetary parameters by fitting the lightcurves with the juliet package. Within this sample of nine candidates, we statistically validated (i.e, with false positive probability < $0.3\%$) two systems (TOI-277 b and TOI-1288 b) by re-processing the candidates with TRICERATOPS along with follow-up observations. These new validated exoplanets expand the known hot Neptunes population and are high-priority targets for future radial velocities follow-up.
Comments: 24 pages, 20 figures. Accepted for publication on MNRAS
Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP)
Cite as: arXiv:2211.08490 [astro-ph.EP]
  (or arXiv:2211.08490v1 [astro-ph.EP] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.08490
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3404

Submission history

From: Christian Magliano [view email]
[v1] Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:40:23 UTC (17,780 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.EP
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-11
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)