Quantum Physics
[Submitted on 19 Jun 2024]
Title:Solving k-SAT problems with generalized quantum measurement
View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:We generalize the projection-based quantum measurement-driven $k$-SAT algorithm of Benjamin, Zhao, and Fitzsimons (BZF, arXiv:1711.02687) to arbitrary strength quantum measurements, including the limit of continuous monitoring. In doing so, we clarify that this algorithm is a particular case of the measurement-driven quantum control strategy elsewhere referred to as "Zeno dragging". We argue that the algorithm is most efficient with finite time and measurement resources in the continuum limit, where measurements have an infinitesimal strength and duration. Moreover, for solvable $k$-SAT problems, the dynamics generated by the algorithm converge deterministically towards target dynamics in the long-time (Zeno) limit, implying that the algorithm can successfully operate autonomously via Lindblad dissipation, without detection. We subsequently study both the conditional and unconditional dynamics of the algorithm implemented via generalized measurements, quantifying the advantages of detection for heralding errors. These strategies are investigated first in a computationally-trivial $2$-qubit $2$-SAT problem to build intuition, and then we consider the scaling of the algorithm on $3$-SAT problems encoded with $4 - 10$ qubits. The average number of shots needed to obtain a solution scales with qubit number as $\lambda^n$. For vanishing dragging time (with final readout only), we find $\lambda = 2$ (corresponding to a brute-force search over possible solutions). However, the deterministic (autonomous) property of the algorithm in the adiabatic (Zeno) limit implies that we can drive $\lambda$ arbitrarily close to $1$, at the cost of a growing pre-factor. We numerically investigate the tradeoffs in these scalings with respect to algorithmic runtime and assess their implications for using this analog measurement-driven approach to quantum computing in practice.
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.