Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Resonance triplet dynamics in the quenched unitary Bose gas

J. van de Kraats j.v.d.kraats@tue.nl Eindhoven University of Technology, P. O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands    D. J. M. Ahmed-Braun Eindhoven University of Technology, P. O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands    V. E. Colussi Infleqtion, Inc., 3030 Sterling Circle, Boulder, CO 80301, USA Pitaevskii BEC Center, CNR-INO and Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy    S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans Eindhoven University of Technology, P. O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
(May 2, 2024)
Abstract

The quenched unitary Bose gas is a paradigmatic example of a strongly interacting out-of-equilibrium quantum system, whose dynamics become difficult to describe theoretically due to the growth of non-Gaussian quantum correlations. We develop a conserving many-body theory capable of capturing these effects, allowing us to model the post-quench dynamics in the previously inaccessible time regime where the gas departs from the universal prethermal stage. Our results show that this departure is driven by the growth of strong lossless three-body correlations, rather than atomic losses, thus framing the heating of the gas in this regime as a fully coherent phenomenon. We uncover the specific few-body scattering processes that affect this heating, and show that the expected connection between the two-body and three-body contacts and the tail of the momentum distribution is obscured following the prethermal stage, explaining the absence of this connection in experiments. Our general framework, which reframes the dynamics of unitary quantum systems in terms of explicit connections to microscopic physics, can be broadly applied to any quantum system containing strong few-body correlations.

Introduction.— It is a well known fact that the quantum many-body problem scales exponentially with the number of particles. Hence, despite the rapid rise in available computing power over the last few decades, exact descriptions typically remain out of computational reach [1, 2]. In many cases however, simplifying assumptions can be made about the underlying processes of the system, namely that they obey Gaussian statistics and can be described by long-lived quasiparticles and collective motions of the medium using just a few degrees of freedom [3]. Such simplifications are at the heart of our understanding of a wide range of quantum phenomena, ranging from Fermi liquids and polarons to superfluids and conventional superconductors [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10].

In realistic quantum systems, however, quasiparticles attain a finite lifetime due to the presence of non-Gaussian correlations, which allow collisions and decay into the many-body continuum [11, 12, 13]. In extreme cases, these correlations lead to such short lifetimes that the quasiparticle spectrum is no longer well defined and the standard simplifications do not apply. The theoretical challenge of understanding such strongly correlated systems is important in many branches of physics, such as condensed matter [14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20], ultracold gases [21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29], nuclear physics [30, 31, 32], and quantum technologies [33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38].

Due to the large degree of control over the interaction strength, ultracold atomic gases provide a versatile quantum simulator for probing non-Gaussian physics [39, 40, 41]. Additionally, the underlying microscopic physics can be encoded exactly in many-body models of these systems, enabling quantitative comparisons between theory and experiment [42, 43]. At the frontier of such approaches is the description of ultracold atomic many-body systems featuring non-perturbative few-body effects [44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49]. Here, a series of experiments exploring the quench of a degenerate Bose gas to the unitary regime [50, 51, 52, 53], where interactions are as strong as allowed by quantum mechanics, raise important fundamental questions regarding the interplay of integrability, ergodicity, and few-body correlations in strongly correlated systems far out of equilibrium. Immediately following the quench, the dynamics are Gaussian and integrable in nature, resulting in the formation of a universal prethermal stage [54, 55, 56, 57]. At later times, non-Gaussian correlations develop and integrability is broken, facilitating the transition of the system towards a global equilibrium. While this behavior is well characterized for weakly interacting systems [54], the analogous breaking of integrability for quenches to the strongly interacting regime poses a highly nontrivial theoretical problem due to the appearance of non-perturbative phenomena such as strong few-body scattering, bound states of the medium [58, 57, 59], and rapid three-body losses [60]. Furthermore, the quench is associated with the formation of an infinite number of three-body bound Efimov states, whose role and impact remains a subject of active research [61, 62, 63, 64, 59].

In this Letter, we utilize the method of cumulants to formulate a conserving theory of the quenched unitary Bose gas, capturing the non-Gaussian correlations forming in the intermediate time regime that follows the prethermal stage but preceeds the crossover into a thermal gas. Through direct comparisons with experiment, we characterize the prethermal departure as a consequence of the growth of strong few-body correlations, rather than incoherent particle losses, which broaden the momentum distribution and result in lossless heating of the system. Then, motivated by the absence of a power-law tail in the asymptotics of the momentum distributions observed in Refs. [50, 53], we examine how this expected behavior set by the universal contact relations [65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71] is obscured as the system departs the prethermal regime.

Model.—We consider a system of N𝑁Nitalic_N identical bosons of mass m𝑚mitalic_m in a cubic volume V𝑉Vitalic_V, which occupy single-particle states with momentum 𝐤𝐤\mathbf{k}bold_k annihilated by operators a^𝐤subscript^𝑎𝐤\hat{a}_{\mathbf{k}}over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Two such atoms may couple to form a energetically-closed channel molecule with center of mass momentum 2𝐤2𝐤2\mathbf{k}2 bold_k and internal energy ν>0𝜈0\nu>0italic_ν > 0, annihilated by the molecular operator b^2𝐤subscript^𝑏2𝐤\hat{b}_{2\mathbf{k}}over^ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Crucially, we neglect any direct interaction between free atoms, such that all scattering processes in the energetically-open channel are mediated by this molecular state. The resulting Hamiltonian reads [72, 73, 74],

H^^𝐻\displaystyle\hat{H}over^ start_ARG italic_H end_ARG =𝐤2k22ma^𝐤a^𝐤+𝐤(2k24m+ν)b^𝐤b^𝐤absentsubscript𝐤superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2superscript𝑘22𝑚superscriptsubscript^𝑎𝐤subscript^𝑎𝐤subscript𝐤superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2superscript𝑘24𝑚𝜈superscriptsubscript^𝑏𝐤subscript^𝑏𝐤\displaystyle=\sum_{\mathbf{k}}\frac{\hbar^{2}k^{2}}{2m}\hat{a}_{\mathbf{k}}^{% \dagger}\hat{a}_{\mathbf{k}}+\sum_{\mathbf{k}}\left(\frac{\hbar^{2}k^{2}}{4m}+% \nu\right)\hat{b}_{\mathbf{k}}^{\dagger}\hat{b}_{\mathbf{k}}= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_m end_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_m end_ARG + italic_ν ) over^ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
+g2V𝐤,𝐪[ζ(2𝐪)b^𝐤a^12𝐤𝐪a^12𝐤+𝐪+h.c.],\displaystyle+\frac{g}{2\sqrt{V}}\sum_{\mathbf{k},\mathbf{q}}\left[\zeta(2% \mathbf{q})\ \hat{b}_{\mathbf{k}}^{\dagger}\hat{a}_{\frac{1}{2}\mathbf{k}-% \mathbf{q}}\hat{a}_{\frac{1}{2}\mathbf{k}+\mathbf{q}}+\mathrm{h.c.}\right],+ divide start_ARG italic_g end_ARG start_ARG 2 square-root start_ARG italic_V end_ARG end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k , bold_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_ζ ( 2 bold_q ) over^ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG bold_k - bold_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG bold_k + bold_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_h . roman_c . ] ,

with k|𝐤|𝑘𝐤k\equiv\absolutevalue*{\mathbf{k}}italic_k ≡ | start_ARG bold_k end_ARG |. The interaction coupling the atomic and molecular states is modelled by a separable potential with strength g𝑔gitalic_g and step-function form factor ζ(2𝐪)θ(Λq)𝜁2𝐪𝜃Λ𝑞\zeta(2\mathbf{q})\equiv\theta(\Lambda-q)italic_ζ ( 2 bold_q ) ≡ italic_θ ( roman_Λ - italic_q ), where θ𝜃\thetaitalic_θ is the Heaviside step function such that ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ represents a cut-off on the relative two-body momentum. By an analytic solution of the two-body problem, the model parameters can be linked to physical quantities via the renormalization relations [42, 75, 76],

g2=8π4m2R,ν=2mR(2Λπa1),formulae-sequencesuperscript𝑔28𝜋superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi4superscript𝑚2subscript𝑅𝜈superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2𝑚subscript𝑅2Λ𝜋superscript𝑎1g^{2}=\frac{8\pi\hbar^{4}}{m^{2}R_{*}},\qquad\nu=\frac{\hbar^{2}}{mR_{*}}\left% (\frac{2\Lambda}{\pi}-a^{-1}\right),italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 8 italic_π roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG , italic_ν = divide start_ARG roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG 2 roman_Λ end_ARG start_ARG italic_π end_ARG - italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , (2)

where a𝑎aitalic_a is the s𝑠sitalic_s-wave scattering length, Rsubscript𝑅R_{*}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the characteristic length scale set by the atom-molecule transition rate [77], and the momentum cut-off is related to the van der Waals length as Λ1/rvdWsimilar-toΛ1subscript𝑟vdW\Lambda\sim 1/r_{\mathrm{vdW}}roman_Λ ∼ 1 / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_vdW end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. At unitarity (a10superscript𝑎10a^{-1}\rightarrow 0italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → 0), the dressed molecular state becomes degenerate with the scattering threshold correspondent with a Feshbach resonance [40]. We express all observables in the Fermi scales kn=(6π2n)1/3subscript𝑘𝑛superscript6superscript𝜋2𝑛13k_{n}=(6\pi^{2}n)^{1/3}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( 6 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, En=2kn2/2msubscript𝐸𝑛superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑛22𝑚E_{n}=\hbar^{2}k_{n}^{2}/2mitalic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 italic_m and tn=/Ensubscript𝑡𝑛Planck-constant-over-2-pisubscript𝐸𝑛t_{n}=\hbar/E_{n}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_ℏ / italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, where n=N/V𝑛𝑁𝑉n=N/Vitalic_n = italic_N / italic_V is the gas density. In a many-body context the relative importance of the molecular state is quantified by the resonance width Rknsubscript𝑅subscript𝑘𝑛R_{*}k_{n}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [78].

For both the atomic and molecular fields we adopt the U(1) symmetry breaking picture of a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC), where the singlets a𝐤=δ𝐤0Vψaexpectation-valuesubscript𝑎𝐤subscript𝛿𝐤0𝑉subscript𝜓𝑎\expectationvalue{a_{\mathbf{k}}}=\delta_{\mathbf{k}0}\sqrt{V}\psi_{a}⟨ start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩ = italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_V end_ARG italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and b𝐤=δ𝐤0Vψmexpectation-valuesubscript𝑏𝐤subscript𝛿𝐤0𝑉subscript𝜓𝑚\expectationvalue{b_{\mathbf{k}}}=\delta_{\mathbf{k}0}\sqrt{V}\psi_{m}⟨ start_ARG italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩ = italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_V end_ARG italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are described by atomic and molecular condensate wave functions ψasubscript𝜓𝑎\psi_{a}italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and ψmsubscript𝜓𝑚\psi_{m}italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT respectively. To model the quench scenario, we assume that for t<0𝑡0t<0italic_t < 0 the gas is an ideal atomic BEC, such that |ψa|2=nsuperscriptsubscript𝜓𝑎2𝑛\absolutevalue{\psi_{a}}^{2}=n| start_ARG italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_n. At t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0, the system is instantaneously quenched to unitarity such that na31much-greater-than𝑛superscript𝑎31na^{3}\gg 1italic_n italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≫ 1. Then, the far out-of-equilibrium BEC state suffers quantum depletion and sequentially generates higher order correlations in the gas, which we track using a cumulant expansion [79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 51]. Truncating the expansion at the level of two-body atomic correlations we obtain the model of Refs. [43, 75], with vanishing background scattering length. This resonance doublet model includes the cumulants (denoted with subscript c),

n𝐤asuperscriptsubscript𝑛𝐤𝑎\displaystyle n_{\mathbf{k}}^{a}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =a^𝐤a^𝐤c,κ𝐤a=a^𝐤a^𝐤c,formulae-sequenceabsentsubscriptexpectation-valuesuperscriptsubscript^𝑎𝐤subscript^𝑎𝐤csuperscriptsubscript𝜅𝐤𝑎subscriptexpectation-valuesubscript^𝑎𝐤subscript^𝑎𝐤c\displaystyle=\expectationvalue*{\hat{a}_{\mathbf{k}}^{\dagger}\hat{a}_{% \mathbf{k}}}_{\mathrm{c}},\qquad\kappa_{\mathbf{k}}^{a}=\expectationvalue*{% \hat{a}_{\mathbf{k}}\hat{a}_{-\mathbf{k}}}_{\mathrm{c}},= ⟨ start_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ⟨ start_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (3)

which describe the single-particle momentum distribution and pairing field respectively. Its integrable equations of motion are equivalent to the two-channel Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov equations [3, 43]. In this work, we introduce an extension of this model referred to as the resonance triplet model. Here we include the additional molecular and mixed-channel cumulants,

n𝐤msuperscriptsubscript𝑛𝐤𝑚\displaystyle n_{\mathbf{k}}^{m}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =b^𝐤b^𝐤c,κ𝐤m=b^𝐤b^𝐤c,formulae-sequenceabsentsubscriptexpectation-valuesuperscriptsubscript^𝑏𝐤subscript^𝑏𝐤csuperscriptsubscript𝜅𝐤𝑚subscriptexpectation-valuesubscript^𝑏𝐤subscript^𝑏𝐤c\displaystyle=\expectationvalue*{\hat{b}_{\mathbf{k}}^{\dagger}\hat{b}_{% \mathbf{k}}}_{\mathrm{c}},\qquad\kappa_{\mathbf{k}}^{m}=\expectationvalue*{% \hat{b}_{\mathbf{k}}\hat{b}_{-\mathbf{k}}}_{\mathrm{c}},= ⟨ start_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ⟨ start_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (4)
χ𝐤subscript𝜒𝐤\displaystyle\chi_{\mathbf{k}}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =b^𝐤a^𝐤c,κ𝐤am=b^𝐤a^𝐤c,formulae-sequenceabsentsubscriptexpectation-valuesuperscriptsubscript^𝑏𝐤subscript^𝑎𝐤csuperscriptsubscript𝜅𝐤𝑎𝑚subscriptexpectation-valuesubscript^𝑏𝐤subscript^𝑎𝐤c\displaystyle=\expectationvalue*{\hat{b}_{\mathbf{k}}^{\dagger}\hat{a}_{% \mathbf{k}}}_{\mathrm{c}},\qquad\kappa_{\mathbf{k}}^{am}=\expectationvalue*{% \hat{b}_{\mathbf{k}}\hat{a}_{-\mathbf{k}}}_{\mathrm{c}},= ⟨ start_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ⟨ start_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ,

and the non-Gaussian tripling field,

R𝐤,𝐪a=a^𝐤a^𝐪a^𝐤𝐪c.superscriptsubscript𝑅𝐤𝐪𝑎subscriptexpectation-valuesubscript^𝑎𝐤subscript^𝑎𝐪subscript^𝑎𝐤𝐪cR_{\mathbf{k},\mathbf{q}}^{a}=\expectationvalue*{\hat{a}_{\mathbf{k}}\hat{a}_{% \mathbf{q}}\hat{a}_{-\mathbf{k}-\mathbf{q}}}_{\mathrm{c}}.italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k , bold_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ⟨ start_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - bold_k - bold_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (5)

In the short-range or vacuum limits, the three-body correlations κ𝐤amsuperscriptsubscript𝜅𝐤𝑎𝑚\kappa_{\mathbf{k}}^{am}italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and R𝐤,𝐪asuperscriptsubscript𝑅𝐤𝐪𝑎R_{\mathbf{k},\mathbf{q}}^{a}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k , bold_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT obey a coupled-channel three-body Schrödinger equation and thus represent closed and open-channel components of the three-body wave function [76]. As shown in Ref. [59], R𝐤,𝐪asuperscriptsubscript𝑅𝐤𝐪𝑎R_{\mathbf{k},\mathbf{q}}^{a}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k , bold_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT becomes macroscopically occupied following the quench and furnishes an order parameter signalling the formation of a Bose-Einstein condensate of Efimovian triples, which motivates its inclusion in the theory. The cumulants χ𝐤subscript𝜒𝐤\chi_{\mathbf{k}}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and n𝐤msuperscriptsubscript𝑛𝐤𝑚n_{\mathbf{k}}^{m}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ensure conservation of energy, which is possible in the resonance triplet model due to the cubic form of the Hamiltonian (Eq. (Resonance triplet dynamics in the quenched unitary Bose gas)). This is a crucial difference between the present model and the single-channel triplet model of Ref. [57], where an inclusion of three-body correlations induces an unphysical leak of energy to the tail of the momentum distribution, thereby prohibiting that model from studying the intermediate time window considered in this Letter.

Refer to caption
((a))
Refer to caption
((b))
Figure 1: Broadening of the single-particle momentum distribution following the quench. In Figs. (a-c) we plot the dynamics of the excited state population n𝐤asuperscriptsubscript𝑛𝐤𝑎n_{\mathbf{k}}^{a}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for a set of momenta. Resonance doublet(triplet) model results shown with dash-dotted(solid) lines, matched with the normalization of the experimental data of Ref. [53], shown with grey circles. In (d) we show in a similar format the dynamics of the average kinetic energy per particle ϵ𝐤subscriptexpectation-valueitalic-ϵ𝐤\expectationvalue{\epsilon}_{\mathbf{k}}⟨ start_ARG italic_ϵ end_ARG ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for the broad resonance case Rkn=0.3subscript𝑅subscript𝑘𝑛0.3R_{*}k_{n}=0.3italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.3, comparing with the experimental data of Ref. [52]. Black dotted line shows the expected Tt2/13similar-to𝑇superscript𝑡213T\sim t^{2/13}italic_T ∼ italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 / 13 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT scaling for loss induced heating [52].

Prethermal departure.— We begin by examining the dynamics of the momentum distribution in Fig. 1, comparing against experimental results to look for clues about the causes of the prethermal departure and the nature of the intermediate time regime. Since higher-order correlations develop sequentially following the quench, the doublet and triplet models are initially equivalent [80]. In this early-time regime, atomic pair excitations are directly generated by condensed molecules, as depicted diagrammatically in Fig. 2(a). As shown in Ref. [75], the early time growth of the condensed molecular fraction scales as |ψm|2(t/t)2similar-tosuperscriptsubscript𝜓𝑚2superscript𝑡subscript𝑡2\absolutevalue{\psi_{m}}^{2}\sim(t/t_{*})^{2}| start_ARG italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ ( italic_t / italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where t=τtnsubscript𝑡𝜏subscript𝑡𝑛t_{*}=\sqrt{\tau t_{n}}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG italic_τ italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG is the mean transition time for atom-molecule conversion. Here τ=mR/kn𝜏𝑚subscript𝑅Planck-constant-over-2-pisubscript𝑘𝑛\tau=mR_{*}/\hbar k_{n}italic_τ = italic_m italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_ℏ italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the molecular lifetime. For broad resonances where Rkn1much-less-thansubscript𝑅subscript𝑘𝑛1R_{*}k_{n}\ll 1italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ 1, one finds ttnmuch-less-thansubscript𝑡subscript𝑡𝑛t_{*}\ll t_{n}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, such that the molecular state acts solely as a mediator of the interaction and the growth of excitations is set purely by tnsubscript𝑡𝑛t_{n}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. If Rknsubscript𝑅subscript𝑘𝑛R_{*}k_{n}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is increased, the associated increase of tsubscript𝑡t_{*}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT gradually slows down the excitation of atoms until the narrow resonance limit Rknsubscript𝑅subscript𝑘𝑛R_{*}k_{n}\rightarrow\inftyitalic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT → ∞, where all dynamics are frozen.

Following the initial excitation growth, a momentum dependent plateau is reached, signifying the quasi-steady prethermal stage characterized by approximate equilibration of macroscopic observables and emblematic of integrable dynamics [54, 57]. Our key finding is that the rapid depletion of the condensate for broad resonances spurs the growth of Rasuperscript𝑅𝑎R^{a}italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and hence of non-Gaussian three-body correlations, leading to a momentum dependent departure from the prethermal stage visible in Fig. 1(a-c). The shape of the departure shows remarkable qualitative agreement with the experiment of Ref. [53], with just slightly slower growth of excitations due to the mismatch in resonance width. In contrast, the integrable resonance doublet model remains in the prethermal stage at all times, consistent with the single-channel doublet model studied in Ref. [57].

Physically, the broadening of the momentum distribution shown in Fig. 1 arises from the significant interaction energy injected into the system by the quench, which is gradually converted into kinetic energy via two and three-body scattering and thus results in lossless correlation-induced, rather than recombination induced, heating. To quantify this lossless heating, we follow experiment [52], and examine the averaged kinetic energy per particle [57],

ϵ𝐤=1N𝐤n𝐤a2k22mθ(kk).subscriptexpectation-valueitalic-ϵ𝐤1𝑁subscriptsuperscript𝐤superscriptsubscript𝑛superscript𝐤𝑎superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2superscript𝑘22𝑚𝜃𝑘superscript𝑘\expectationvalue{\epsilon}_{\mathbf{k}}=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{\mathbf{k}^{\prime}}% n_{\mathbf{k}^{\prime}}^{a}\frac{\hbar^{2}k^{\prime 2}}{2m}\theta(k-k^{\prime}).⟨ start_ARG italic_ϵ end_ARG ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_m end_ARG italic_θ ( italic_k - italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) . (6)

The restriction to a maximum momentum k𝑘kitalic_k accounts for the limited resolution in the experiment [52]. From Fig. 1(d) it is clear that the Gaussian statistics of the resonance doublet model are unable to capture the experimental departure from the prethermal plateau that occurs by ttnsimilar-to𝑡subscript𝑡𝑛t\sim t_{n}italic_t ∼ italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The resonance triplet model does capture this departure, following the experimental results until the crossover where the gas was experimentally found to pass from degenerate to nondegenerate regimes. This agreement further strengthens the interpretation of the dynamics at intermediate times as correlation (rather than loss) dominated.

Refer to caption
((a))
Figure 2: Two-body (a) and three-body (b) scattering processes that drive the depletion of the atomic condensate. Atomic(molecular) states shown with single(double) lines, and condensed states shown in dashed red. Each vertex represents atom-molecule conversion.

Correlations in the intermediate time regime.— Having provided evidence for the lossless nature of the intermediate time regime, we now study the dominant processes in the system during this time. The difference between the resonance doublet and resonance triplet dynamics in Fig. 1 arises predominantly from a distinct non-Gaussian process in the resonance triplet model, shown diagrammatically in Fig. 2(b) [76]. Together, the processes in Fig. 2 seed the post-quench growth of short-range atomic two- and three-body correlation functions, given as,

dd=|1V𝐤κ𝐤a|2,tt=|1V32𝐤,𝐪R𝐤,𝐪a|2.formulae-sequenceexpectation-valuesuperscript𝑑𝑑superscript1𝑉subscript𝐤superscriptsubscript𝜅𝐤𝑎2expectation-valuesuperscript𝑡𝑡superscript1superscript𝑉32subscript𝐤𝐪superscriptsubscript𝑅𝐤𝐪𝑎2\expectationvalue{d^{\dagger}d}=\absolutevalue{\frac{1}{V}\sum_{\mathbf{k}}% \kappa_{\mathbf{k}}^{a}}^{2},\qquad\expectationvalue{t^{\dagger}t}=% \absolutevalue{\frac{1}{V^{\frac{3}{2}}}\sum_{\mathbf{k},\mathbf{q}}R_{\mathbf% {k},\mathbf{q}}^{a}}^{2}.⟨ start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d end_ARG ⟩ = | start_ARG divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_V end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , ⟨ start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_ARG ⟩ = | start_ARG divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k , bold_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k , bold_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (7)

Here d^=ψ^(𝟎)ψ^(𝟎)^𝑑^𝜓𝟎^𝜓𝟎\hat{d}=\hat{\psi}(\mathbf{0})\hat{\psi}(\mathbf{0})over^ start_ARG italic_d end_ARG = over^ start_ARG italic_ψ end_ARG ( bold_0 ) over^ start_ARG italic_ψ end_ARG ( bold_0 ) and t^=ψ^(𝟎)ψ^(𝟎)ψ^(𝟎)^𝑡^𝜓𝟎^𝜓𝟎^𝜓𝟎\hat{t}=\hat{\psi}(\mathbf{0})\hat{\psi}(\mathbf{0})\hat{\psi}(\mathbf{0})over^ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG = over^ start_ARG italic_ψ end_ARG ( bold_0 ) over^ start_ARG italic_ψ end_ARG ( bold_0 ) over^ start_ARG italic_ψ end_ARG ( bold_0 ) represent the local dimer and trimer field respectively, with the field operator ψ^(𝟎)=(1/V)𝐤a^𝐤^𝜓𝟎1𝑉subscript𝐤subscript^𝑎𝐤\hat{\psi}(\mathbf{0})=(1/\sqrt{V})\sum_{\mathbf{k}}\hat{a}_{\mathbf{k}}over^ start_ARG italic_ψ end_ARG ( bold_0 ) = ( 1 / square-root start_ARG italic_V end_ARG ) ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Due to their short-range nature, the value of the correlation functions is expected to be fully specified by universal relations derived from few-body physics. Hence they can be directly related to the two-body and three-body contact densities 𝒞2subscript𝒞2\mathcal{C}_{2}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and 𝒞3subscript𝒞3\mathcal{C}_{3}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which form a measure of the probability for finding two and three particles in close proximity [65, 66, 67, 70]. In our two-channel model, we derive the following relations from effective field theory [76],

𝒞2subscript𝒞2\displaystyle\mathcal{C}_{2}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =m2g444ν2dd+m3g626ν3Λ2(H+Jπ)ttabsentsuperscript𝑚2superscript𝑔44superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi4superscript𝜈2expectation-valuesuperscript𝑑𝑑superscript𝑚3superscript𝑔62superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi6superscript𝜈3superscriptΛ2𝐻𝐽𝜋expectation-valuesuperscript𝑡𝑡\displaystyle=\frac{m^{2}g^{4}}{4\hbar^{4}\nu^{2}}\expectationvalue{d^{\dagger% }d}+\frac{m^{3}g^{6}}{2\hbar^{6}\nu^{3}\Lambda^{2}}\left(H+\frac{J}{\pi}\right% )\expectationvalue{t^{\dagger}t}= divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ⟨ start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d end_ARG ⟩ + divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_H + divide start_ARG italic_J end_ARG start_ARG italic_π end_ARG ) ⟨ start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_ARG ⟩ (8)
𝒞3subscript𝒞3\displaystyle\mathcal{C}_{3}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =m2g484ν2Λ2Htt.absentsuperscript𝑚2superscript𝑔48superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi4superscript𝜈2superscriptΛ2superscript𝐻expectation-valuesuperscript𝑡𝑡\displaystyle=-\frac{m^{2}g^{4}}{8\hbar^{4}\nu^{2}\Lambda^{2}}H^{\prime}% \expectationvalue{t^{\dagger}t}.= - divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 8 roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟨ start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_ARG ⟩ . (9)

Here H,J,H𝐻𝐽superscript𝐻H,J,H^{\prime}italic_H , italic_J , italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are known log-periodic functions of the Efimovian binding wavenumber κsubscript𝜅\kappa_{*}italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the cut-off ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ [70]. As shown in Fig. 3, the prethermal departure is indeed correlated with a significant increase in 𝒞3subscript𝒞3\mathcal{C}_{3}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, indicating the introduction of strong non-Gaussian three-body correlations in this regime. Simultaneously, the influence of surrounding particles on clustered pairs leads to a significant decrease of the two-body contact [57]. As shown in Ref. [59], the value of 𝒞2subscript𝒞2\mathcal{C}_{2}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and 𝒞3subscript𝒞3\mathcal{C}_{3}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT following the quench is determined predominantly by the magnitude of macroscopic order parameters associated with condensation of pairs and triples. These findings are confirmed in our model by the development of a substantial fraction of condensed triples for t>tn𝑡subscript𝑡𝑛t>t_{n}italic_t > italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [76]. We note that the increase of 𝒞3subscript𝒞3\mathcal{C}_{3}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for broad resonances is connected with an increased overlap of the size of the Efimov trimer, quantified by the binding wavenumber κsubscript𝜅\kappa_{*}italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and the Fermi scale knsubscript𝑘𝑛k_{n}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Consistent with Figs. 1(a-c), the value of 𝒞3subscript𝒞3\mathcal{C}_{3}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is decreased for narrow resonances, where κknmuch-less-thansubscript𝜅subscript𝑘𝑛\kappa_{*}\ll k_{n}italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT represents the previously unexplored opposite limit to the universal regime κknmuch-greater-thansubscript𝜅subscript𝑘𝑛\kappa_{*}\gg k_{n}italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≫ italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT examined in Ref. [59].

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Dynamics of two-body and three-body contact densities 𝒞2subscript𝒞2\mathcal{C}_{2}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in (a) and 𝒞3subscript𝒞3\mathcal{C}_{3}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in (b), for different values of the resonance width Rknsubscript𝑅subscript𝑘𝑛R_{*}k_{n}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Results from the resonance doublet(triplet) model shown with dash-dotted(solid) lines. For comparison we show with black dashed lines the linear early time growth of 𝒞2subscript𝒞2\mathcal{C}_{2}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as derived in Ref. [84] for broad resonances and the long time constant value of 𝒞2subscript𝒞2\mathcal{C}_{2}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT from Ref. [85]. For 𝒞3subscript𝒞3\mathcal{C}_{3}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT we show the range of quadratic early time growths derived in Ref. [63], which correspond to maximum (kn/κ1similar-tosubscript𝑘𝑛subscript𝜅1k_{n}/\kappa_{*}\sim 1italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 1) and minimum (κknmuch-less-thansubscript𝜅subscript𝑘𝑛\kappa_{*}\ll k_{n}italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) enhancement of 𝒞3subscript𝒞3\mathcal{C}_{3}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT due to the Efimov effect, again in the broad resonance limit.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Dynamics of the tail of the single-particle momentum distribution for the broad resonance Rkn=0.3subscript𝑅subscript𝑘𝑛0.3R_{*}k_{n}=0.3italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.3. In the left(right) panels we compare the resonance doublet(triplet) models with the asymptotic prediction in Eq. (10), shown with a black dashed line. For the sake of comparison the doublet results are replotted in the right-hand panels. For t/tn=1.0𝑡subscript𝑡𝑛1.0t/t_{n}=1.0italic_t / italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.0 and 2.02.02.02.0 we also compare with the experimental data of Ref. [53], shown with the green circles.

Asymptotics in the intermediate time regime.—We now focus on the large-momentum tail of n𝐤asuperscriptsubscript𝑛𝐤𝑎n_{\mathbf{k}}^{a}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, whose expected behavior due to universal relations derived from few-body physics was not observed in experiments [50, 53]. Specifically, the following asymptotic behavior is predicted at thermal equilibrium,

k4n𝐤ak𝒞2+𝒞3F(k)/k,superscript𝑘4superscriptsubscript𝑛𝐤𝑎𝑘subscript𝒞2subscript𝒞3𝐹𝑘𝑘k^{4}n_{\mathbf{k}}^{a}\underset{k\rightarrow\infty}{\longrightarrow}\mathcal{% C}_{2}+\mathcal{C}_{3}F(k)/k,italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_UNDERACCENT italic_k → ∞ end_UNDERACCENT start_ARG ⟶ end_ARG caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ( italic_k ) / italic_k , (10)

where F(k)𝐹𝑘F(k)italic_F ( italic_k ) is a log-periodic function specified by κsubscript𝜅\kappa_{*}italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [70]. While Eq. (10) provides a possible route to extract the values of the contacts from n𝐤asuperscriptsubscript𝑛𝐤𝑎n_{\mathbf{k}}^{a}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, a 1/k41superscript𝑘41/k^{4}1 / italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT tail has so far not been observed in quench experiments [50, 53]. Fits to Eq. (10) were made in Ref. [71], but found values for 𝒞2subscript𝒞2\mathcal{C}_{2}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT considerably larger than expected from theoretical calculations [86, 85, 57]. Additionally it has been shown that in lower dimensional systems the scaling in Eq. (10) can be disrupted by non-local correlations [87].

Motivated by this disagreement between existing theory and experiment, we compare in Fig. 4 the single-particle momentum distribution obtained from our models with the asymptotic prediction in Eq. (10). In the resonance doublet model, where all dynamics are Gaussian, 𝒞3subscript𝒞3\mathcal{C}_{3}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vanishes trivially and one can show analytically that the expected 1/k41superscript𝑘41/k^{4}1 / italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT power law due to 𝒞2subscript𝒞2\mathcal{C}_{2}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is always present [76]. In the resonance triplet model, we observe that the non-Gaussian processes responsible for the departure from the prethermal stage for ttngreater-than-or-equivalent-to𝑡subscript𝑡𝑛t\gtrsim t_{n}italic_t ≳ italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT damp the oscillatory behavior of n𝐤asuperscriptsubscript𝑛𝐤𝑎n_{\mathbf{k}}^{a}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, consistent with the findings of Ref. [54] at weak interactions and in agreement with the experimental data of Ref. [53]. At the same time, the significant increase of excitations for k>kn𝑘subscript𝑘𝑛k>k_{n}italic_k > italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT obscures the expected power laws for all the examined momenta k/kn4𝑘subscript𝑘𝑛4k/k_{n}\leq 4italic_k / italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 4. Hence, once the gas has exited the prethermal stage, the asymptotic expansion in Eq. (10) no longer captures the momentum distribution over the considered range. As experimental results are lacking beyond this range due to poor signal-to-noise ratio [50], our findings suggest that significant caution should be exercised when fitting Eq. (10) out of equilibrium, and explain why a power-law tail was not seen in Refs. [50, 71]. It is important to note however that our results do not invalidate Eq. (10), but rather push its possible applicability to larger momenta. For sufficiently large values of k/kn𝑘subscript𝑘𝑛k/k_{n}italic_k / italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, our distributions do converge consistently with the value of 𝒞2subscript𝒞2\mathcal{C}_{2}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT obtained from Eq. (8), but also exhibit strong finite range features due to the density regimes considered [76]. We have confirmed that the distributions in Fig. 4 are density independent.

Conclusion— In this Letter, we have shown how a conserving many-body model constructed from a selection of microscopically relevant Gaussian and non-Gaussian correlations, is able to elucidate the dynamics of quenched unitary Bose gases in the time window succeeding the integrable dynamics associated with the prethermal stage. In the future, this general framework can be used in studying the wide-array of other quantum systems that exhibit non-Gaussian physics, including for example strongly interacting ultracold mixtures and polarons [48, 49, 88, 89, 29], trions in semiconductors [90, 91, 92, 93, 94], nuclear matter [95, 96, 97, 98], and Rydberg atom arrays [99].

Acknowledgements.
We thank Silvia Musolino for fruitful discussions. J.v.d.K. and S.J.J.M.F.K. acknowledge financial support from the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy (EZK), as part of the Quantum Delta NL program. D.J.M.A.B. acknowledges financial support from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) under Grant No. 680-47-623. V.E.C. acknowledges financial support from the Provincia Autonoma di Trento, the Italian MIUR under the PRIN2017 projectCEnTraL, and from the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. NSF PHY-1748958.

References

  • Dirac [1929] P. Dirac, Quantum mechanics of many-electron systems, Proc. R. Soc. A 123, 714 (1929).
  • Cao et al. [2019] Y. Cao, J. Romero, J. P. Olson, M. Degroote, P. D. Johnson, M. Kieferová, I. D. Kivlichan, T. Menke, B. Peropadre, N. P. D. Sawaya, S. Sim, L. Veis, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing, Chem. Rev. 119, 10856 (2019).
  • Blaizot and Ripka [1985] J.-P. Blaizot and G. Ripka, Quantum Theory of Finite Systems  (The MIT Press, 1985).
  • Landau [1933] L. Landau, Uber de bewegung der elektronen im kristallgitter, Phys. Z. Sov. 3, 664 (1933).
  • Bardeen et al. [1957] J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957).
  • Anderson [1958] P. W. Anderson, Random-phase approximation in the theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 112, 1900 (1958).
  • Dagotto [1994] E. Dagotto, Correlated electrons in high-temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 763 (1994).
  • Fetter and Walecka [2003] A. Fetter and J. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many-particle Systems, Dover Books on Physics (Dover Publications, 2003).
  • Giorgini et al. [2008] S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Theory of ultracold atomic fermi gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1215 (2008).
  • Pitaevskii and Stringari [2016] L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Bose-Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity, International series of monographs on physics (Oxford University Press, 2016).
  • Belieav [1958] S. T. Belieav, Sov. Phys. JETP 2, 299 (1958).
  • Kaplan et al. [1976] S. B. Kaplan, C. C. Chi, D. N. Langenberg, J. J. Chang, S. Jafarey, and D. J. Scalapino, Quasiparticle and phonon lifetimes in superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 14, 4854 (1976).
  • Pitaevskii and Stringari [1997] L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Landau damping in dilute bose gases, Physics Letters A 235, 398 (1997).
  • Zhitomirsky and Chernyshev [1999] M. E. Zhitomirsky and A. L. Chernyshev, Instability of antiferromagnetic magnons in strong fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4536 (1999).
  • Hill et al. [2001] R. Hill, C. Proust, L. Taillefer, P. Fournier, and R. L. Greene, Breakdown of fermi-liquid theory in a copper-oxide superconductor, Nature 414, 711 (2001).
  • Dagotto [2005] E. Dagotto, Complexity in strongly correlated electronic systems, Science 309, 257 (2005).
  • Stone et al. [2006] M. B. Stone, I. A. Zaliznyak, T. Hong, C. L. Broholm, and D. H. Reich, Quasiparticle breakdown in a quantum spin liquid, Nature 440, 187 (2006).
  • Maniv et al. [2015] E. Maniv, M. Shalom, A. Ron, et al., Strong correlations elucidate the electronic structure and phase diagram of laalo3/srtio3 interface., Nat. Commun. 6, 8239 (2015).
  • Cao et al. [2018] Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, et al., Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices., Nature 556, 43 (2018).
  • Meng et al. [2023] Z. Meng, L. Wang, W. Han, et al., Atomic bose–einstein condensate in twisted-bilayer optical lattices., Nature 615, 231 (2023).
  • Van Houcke et al. [2012] K. Van Houcke, W. F., E. Kozik, et al., Feynman diagrams versus fermi-gas feynman emulator., Nat. Phys. 8, 366 (2012).
  • Schauß et al. [2012] P. Schauß, M. Cheneau, M. Endres, et al., Observation of spatially ordered structures in a two-dimensional rydberg gas, Nature 491, 87 (2012).
  • Sagi et al. [2015] Y. Sagi, T. E. Drake, R. Paudel, R. Chapurin, and D. S. Jin, Breakdown of the fermi liquid description for strongly interacting fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 075301 (2015).
  • Chevy and Salomon [2016] F. Chevy and C. Salomon, Strongly correlated bose gases, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 49, 192001 (2016).
  • Schweigler et al. [2017] T. Schweigler, V. Kasper, S. Erne, et al., Experimental characterization of a quantum many-body system via higher-order correlations, Nature 545, 323 (2017).
  • Shi et al. [2018] T. Shi, E. Demler, and J. Ignacio Cirac, Variational study of fermionic and bosonic systems with non-gaussian states: Theory and applications, Annals of Physics 390, 245 (2018).
  • Peña Ardila et al. [2020] L. A. Peña Ardila, G. E. Astrakharchik, and S. Giorgini, Strong coupling bose polarons in a two-dimensional gas, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023405 (2020).
  • Schweigler et al. [2021] T. Schweigler, M. Gluza, M. Tajik, et al., Decay and recurrence of non-gaussian correlations in a quantum many-body system, Nat. Phys. 17, 559 (2021).
  • Mostaan et al. [2023] N. Mostaan, N. Goldman, and F. Grusdt, A unified theory of strong coupling bose polarons: From repulsive polarons to non-gaussian many-body bound states, arXiv:2305.00835 (2023).
  • Arrington et al. [2012] J. Arrington, D. Higinbotham, G. Rosner, and M. Sargsian, Hard probes of short-range nucleon–nucleon correlations, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 67, 898 (2012).
  • Hen et al. [2017] O. Hen, G. A. Miller, E. Piasetzky, and L. B. Weinstein, Nucleon-nucleon correlations, short-lived excitations, and the quarks within, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 045002 (2017).
  • Berges et al. [2021] J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Venugopalan, Qcd thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035003 (2021).
  • Dong et al. [2008] R. Dong, M. Lassen, J. Heersink, C. Marquardt, R. Filip, G. Leuchs, and U. L. Andersen, Experimental entanglement distillation of mesoscopic quantum states, Nat. Phys. 4, 919 (2008).
  • Gomes et al. [2009] R. M. Gomes, A. Salles, F. Toscano, P. H. S. Ribeiro, and S. P. Walborn, Quantum entanglement beyond gaussian criteria, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 21517 (2009).
  • Leverrier and Grangier [2011] A. Leverrier and P. Grangier, Continuous-variable quantum-key-distribution protocols with a non-gaussian modulation, Phys. Rev. A 83, 042312 (2011).
  • Bariani et al. [2012] F. Bariani, Y. O. Dudin, T. A. B. Kennedy, and A. Kuzmich, Dephasing of multiparticle rydberg excitations for fast entanglement generation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 030501 (2012).
  • Ra et al. [2020] Y. Ra, A. Dufour, M. Walschaers, et al., Non-gaussian quantum states of a multimode light field., Nat. Phys. 16, 144 (2020).
  • Walschaers [2021] M. Walschaers, Non-gaussian quantum states and where to find them, PRX Quantum 2, 030204 (2021).
  • Haller et al. [2009] E. Haller, M. Gustavsson, M. J. Mark, J. G. Danzl, R. Hart, G. Pupillo, and H.-C. Nägerl, Realization of an excited, strongly correlated quantum gas phase, Science 325, 1224 (2009).
  • Chin et al. [2010] C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225 (2010).
  • Bloch et al. [2012] I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimbène, Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases, Nat. Phys. 8, 267 (2012).
  • Kokkelmans et al. [2002] S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, J. N. Milstein, M. L. Chiofalo, R. Walser, and M. J. Holland, Resonance superfluidity: Renormalization of resonance scattering theory, Phys. Rev. A 65, 053617 (2002).
  • Kokkelmans and Holland [2002] S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans and M. J. Holland, Ramsey fringes in a bose-einstein condensate between atoms and molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 180401 (2002).
  • Levinsen et al. [2015] J. Levinsen, M. M. Parish, and G. M. Bruun, Impurity in a bose-einstein condensate and the efimov effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 125302 (2015).
  • Fletcher et al. [2017] R. J. Fletcher, R. Lopes, J. Man, N. Navon, R. P. Smith, M. W. Zwierlein, and Z. Hadzibabic, Two- and three-body contacts in the unitary bose gas, Science 355, 377 (2017).
  • Klauss et al. [2017] C. E. Klauss, X. Xie, C. Lopez-Abadia, J. P. D’Incao, Z. Hadzibabic, D. S. Jin, and E. A. Cornell, Observation of efimov molecules created from a resonantly interacting bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 143401 (2017).
  • Christianen et al. [2022] A. Christianen, J. I. Cirac, and R. Schmidt, Bose polaron and the efimov effect: A gaussian-state approach, Phys. Rev. A 105, 053302 (2022).
  • Patel et al. [2023] K. Patel, G. Cai, H. Ando, and C. Chin, Sound propagation in a bose-fermi mixture: From weak to strong interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 083003 (2023).
  • Schumacher et al. [2023] G. L. Schumacher, J. T. Mäkinen, Y. Ji, G. G. T. Assumpção, J. Chen, S. Huang, F. J. Vivanco, and N. Navon, Observation of anomalous decay of a polarized three-component fermi gas, arXiv:2301.02237 (2023).
  • Makotyn et al. [2014] P. Makotyn, C. E. Klauss, D. L. Goldberger, E. A. Cornell, and D. S. Jin, Universal dynamics of a degenerate unitary bose gas, Nat. Phys. 10, 116 (2014).
  • Kira [2015a] M. Kira, Coherent quantum depletion of an interacting atom condensate, Nat. Commun. 6, 6624 (2015a).
  • Eigen et al. [2017] C. Eigen, J. A. P. Glidden, R. Lopes, N. Navon, Z. Hadzibabic, and R. P. Smith, Universal scaling laws in the dynamics of a homogeneous unitary bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 250404 (2017).
  • Eigen et al. [2018] C. Eigen, J. Glidden, R. Lopes, et al., Universal prethermal dynamics of bose gases, Nature 563, 221 (2018).
  • Van Regemortel et al. [2018] M. Van Regemortel, H. Kurkjian, M. Wouters, and I. Carusotto, Prethermalization to thermalization crossover in a dilute bose gas following an interaction ramp, Phys. Rev. A 98, 053612 (2018).
  • Muñoz de las Heras et al. [2019] A. Muñoz de las Heras, M. M. Parish, and F. M. Marchetti, Early-time dynamics of bose gases quenched into the strongly interacting regime, Phys. Rev. A 99, 023623 (2019).
  • Gao et al. [2020] C. Gao, M. Sun, P. Zhang, and H. Zhai, Universal dynamics of a degenerate bose gas quenched to unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 040403 (2020).
  • Colussi et al. [2020] V. E. Colussi, H. Kurkjian, M. Van Regemortel, S. Musolino, J. van de Kraats, M. Wouters, and S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, Cumulant theory of the unitary bose gas: Prethermal and efimovian dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 102, 063314 (2020).
  • Musolino et al. [2019] S. Musolino, V. E. Colussi, and S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, Pair formation in quenched unitary bose gases, Phys. Rev. A 100, 013612 (2019).
  • Musolino et al. [2022] S. Musolino, H. Kurkjian, M. Van Regemortel, M. Wouters, S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, and V. E. Colussi, Bose-einstein condensation of efimovian triples in the unitary bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 020401 (2022).
  • Braaten and Hammer [2006] E. Braaten and H.-W. Hammer, Universality in few-body systems with large scattering length, Physics Reports 428, 259 (2006).
  • Efimov [1971] V. Efimov, WEAKLY-BOUND STATES OF 3 RESONANTLY-INTERACTING PARTICLES, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 12, 589 (1971).
  • Efimov [1979] V. Efimov, Low-energy Properties of Three Resonantly Interacting Particles, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 29, 1058 (1979).
  • Colussi et al. [2018] V. E. Colussi, J. P. Corson, and J. P. D’Incao, Dynamics of three-body correlations in quenched unitary bose gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 100401 (2018).
  • D’Incao et al. [2018] J. P. D’Incao, J. Wang, and V. E. Colussi, Efimov physics in quenched unitary bose gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 023401 (2018).
  • Tan [2008a] S. Tan, Energetics of a strongly correlated fermi gas, Annals of Physics 323, 2952 (2008a).
  • Tan [2008b] S. Tan, Large momentum part of a strongly correlated fermi gas, Annals of Physics 323, 2971 (2008b).
  • Tan [2008c] S. Tan, Generalized virial theorem and pressure relation for a strongly correlated fermi gas, Annals of Physics 323, 2987 (2008c).
  • Werner and Castin [2012a] F. Werner and Y. Castin, General relations for quantum gases in two and three dimensions: Two-component fermions, Phys. Rev. A 86, 013626 (2012a).
  • Werner and Castin [2012b] F. Werner and Y. Castin, General relations for quantum gases in two and three dimensions. ii. bosons and mixtures, Phys. Rev. A 86, 053633 (2012b).
  • Braaten et al. [2011] E. Braaten, D. Kang, and L. Platter, Universal relations for identical bosons from three-body physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 153005 (2011).
  • Smith et al. [2014] D. H. Smith, E. Braaten, D. Kang, and L. Platter, Two-body and three-body contacts for identical bosons near unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 110402 (2014).
  • Gurarie and Radzihovsky [2007] V. Gurarie and L. Radzihovsky, Resonantly paired fermionic superfluids, Annals of Physics 322, 2 (2007), january Special Issue 2007.
  • Gogolin et al. [2008] A. O. Gogolin, C. Mora, and R. Egger, Analytical solution of the bosonic three-body problem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 140404 (2008).
  • Schmidt et al. [2012] R. Schmidt, R. Rath, and W. Zwerger, Efimov physics beyond universality, Eur. Phys. J. B 85, 386 (2012).
  • Ahmed-Braun et al. [2022] D. J. M. Ahmed-Braun, S. Musolino, V. E. Colussi, and S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, Evolution of the unitary bose gas for broad to narrow feshbach resonances, Phys. Rev. A 106, 013315 (2022).
  • [76] See Supplemental Material, which contains details regarding the two-body interaction, cumulant equations of motion, few-body equations and processes, condensate fractions, and contact relations.
  • Petrov [2004] D. S. Petrov, Three-boson problem near a narrow feshbach resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 143201 (2004).
  • Ho et al. [2012] T.-L. Ho, X. Cui, and W. Li, Alternative route to strong interaction: Narrow feshbach resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 250401 (2012).
  • Kira and Koch [2012] M. Kira and S. W. Koch, Semiconductor Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
  • Kira [2015b] M. Kira, Hyperbolic bloch equations: Atom-cluster kinetics of an interacting bose gas, Annals of Physics 356, 185 (2015b).
  • Fricke [1996] J. Fricke, Transport equations including many-particle correlations for an arbitrary quantum system: A general formalism, Annals of Physics 252, 479 (1996).
  • Köhler and Burnett [2002] T. Köhler and K. Burnett, Microscopic quantum dynamics approach to the dilute condensed bose gas, Phys. Rev. A 65, 033601 (2002).
  • Kira [2014] M. Kira, Excitation picture of an interacting bose gas, Annals of Physics 351, 200 (2014).
  • Corson and Bohn [2015] J. P. Corson and J. L. Bohn, Bound-state signatures in quenched bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 91, 013616 (2015).
  • Sykes et al. [2014] A. G. Sykes, J. P. Corson, J. P. D’Incao, A. P. Koller, C. H. Greene, A. M. Rey, K. R. A. Hazzard, and J. L. Bohn, Quenching to unitarity: Quantum dynamics in a three-dimensional bose gas, Phys. Rev. A 89, 021601(R) (2014).
  • Diederix et al. [2011] J. M. Diederix, T. C. F. van Heijst, and H. T. C. Stoof, Ground state of a resonantly interacting bose gas, Phys. Rev. A 84, 033618 (2011).
  • Corson and Bohn [2016] J. P. Corson and J. L. Bohn, Ballistic quench-induced correlation waves in ultracold gases, Phys. Rev. A 94, 023604 (2016).
  • Hu et al. [2016] M.-G. Hu, M. J. Van de Graaff, D. Kedar, J. P. Corson, E. A. Cornell, and D. S. Jin, Bose polarons in the strongly interacting regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 055301 (2016).
  • Duda et al. [2023] M. Duda, X. Chen, A. Schindewolf, et al., Transition from a polaronic condensate to a degenerate fermi gas of heteronuclear molecules, Nat. Phys. 19, 720 (2023).
  • Mak et al. [2013] K. Mak, K. He, C. Lee, et al., Tightly bound trions in monolayer MoS2subscriptMoS2\mathrm{MoS}_{2}roman_MoS start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTNat. Mater. 12, 207 (2013).
  • Deilmann et al. [2016] T. Deilmann, M. Drüppel, and M. Rohlfing, Three-particle correlation from a many-body perspective: Trions in a carbon nanotube, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 196804 (2016).
  • Rana et al. [2020] F. Rana, O. Koksal, and C. Manolatou, Many-body theory of the optical conductivity of excitons and trions in two-dimensional materials, Phys. Rev. B 102, 085304 (2020).
  • Rana et al. [2021] F. Rana, O. Koksal, M. Jung, G. Shvets, A. N. Vamivakas, and C. Manolatou, Exciton-trion polaritons in doped two-dimensional semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127402 (2021).
  • Zhumagulov et al. [2022] Y. V. Zhumagulov, S. Chiavazzo, D. R. Gulevich, et al., Microscopic theory of exciton and trion polaritons in doped monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides, Npj Comput. Mater. 8, 92 (2022).
  • Bethe [1965] H. A. Bethe, Three-body correlations in nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. 138, B804 (1965).
  • Dean and Hjorth-Jensen [2003] D. J. Dean and M. Hjorth-Jensen, Pairing in nuclear systems: from neutron stars to finite nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 607 (2003).
  • Otsuka et al. [2020] T. Otsuka, A. Gade, O. Sorlin, T. Suzuki, and Y. Utsuno, Evolution of shell structure in exotic nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015002 (2020).
  • Pérez-Obiol et al. [2023] A. Pérez-Obiol, A. M. Romero, J. Menéndez, et al., Nuclear shell-model simulation in digital quantum computers, Sci. Rep. 13, 12291 (2023).
  • Deger et al. [2023] A. Deger, A. Daniel, Z. Papić, and J. K. Pachos, Persistent non-gaussian correlations in out-of-equilibrium rydberg atom arrays, arXiv:2306.12210 (2023).