Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Interplay between magnetism and superconductivity in a hybrid magnon-photon bilayer system

Alberto Ghirri alberto.ghirri@nano.cnr.it Istituto Nanoscienze - CNR, Centro S3, via G. Campi 213/A, 41125, Modena, Italy.    Claudio Bonizzoni Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Informatiche e Matematiche Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, via G. Campi 213/A, 41125, Modena, Italy Istituto Nanoscienze - CNR, Centro S3, via G. Campi 213/A, 41125, Modena, Italy.    Maksut Maksutoglu Institute of Nanotechnology, Gebze Technical University, 41400, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey    Marco Affronte Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Informatiche e Matematiche Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, via G. Campi 213/A, 41125, Modena, Italy Istituto Nanoscienze - CNR, Centro S3, via G. Campi 213/A, 41125, Modena, Italy.
(July 12, 2024)
Abstract

Spin waves in magnetic films are affected by the vicinity to a superconductor. Here we focus on a bilayer stack made of an insulating Yttrium Iron Garnet (YIG) film and a high-Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT YBCO superconducting planar resonator and report microwave transmission spectra to monitor the temperature evolution of magnon-photon polaritons. We show that the observed temperature dependence of normal mode splitting and frequency shift with respect to the unperturbed magnon mode can be ultimately related to the penetration depth of YBCO, as an effect of the interplay between spin waves and Meissner currents.

The interplay between magnetism and superconductivity comprises a variety of physical phenomena observed when superconducting and magnetic layers get close one to another: the diamagnetism of an adjacent superconductor perturbs the propagation of spin waves in ferro(i)magnets Golovchanskiy et al. (2018); Yu and Bauer (2022); Borst et al. (2023); Zhou and Yu (2023) and, in turns, the superconducting state of a film is affected by the profile of spin excitations in a neighbouring magnetic layer Dobrovolskiy et al. (2019); Ianovskaia et al. (2023). The description of these effects is intriguing and, just to start with, it will be useful to assess to which extent the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) description of spin waves combined with the two-fluid model for the superconductor are effective to account for, at least, the non-dissipative effects of this interplay.

High-Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT superconducting resonators, in particular those based on YBa2Cu3O7subscriptYBa2subscriptCu3subscriptO7\mathrm{YBa_{2}Cu_{3}O_{7}}roman_YBa start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Cu start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_O start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 7 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (YBCO) films, display critical temperature (Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) above the liquid nitrogen boiling point, resilience in applied magnetic field and low damping of microwaves Hein (1999); Ghirri et al. (2015). These characteristics have been successfully exploited for the manipulation of spin systems Bonizzoni et al. (2020); Artzi et al. (2022); Bonizzoni et al. (2023, 2024) and for the implementation of hybrid spin-photon modes Ghirri et al. (2015, 2016); Bonizzoni et al. (2017); Velluire-Pellat et al. (2023). Insulating and ferrimagnetic Yttrium Iron Garnet (YIG) is widely used in (planar) magnonic devices for its exceptionally low damping of magnetization precession Gurevich and Melkov (1996); Pirro et al. (2021).

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) Top view and (b) vertical section of the YBCO resonator with the YIG film stacked on top. (c) Temperature dependence of the fundamental frequency (ωc(T)subscript𝜔𝑐𝑇\omega_{c}(T)italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T )) of the bare resonator (circles); the black line is calculated with Eq. 1. The penetration depth derived at the frequency of the resonator (Eq. 2) is displayed in red. The horizontal dashed line indicates the thickness of the YBCO film (t=330𝑡330t=330italic_t = 330 nm). Inset. S21(ω)subscript𝑆21𝜔S_{21}(\omega)italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω ) spectrum taken at 10 K (circles) and fit sup . The incident power is 15dBm15dBm-15~{}\mathrm{dBm}- 15 roman_dBm in all the measurements.

Magnetic imaging experiments have shown that underneath a superconducting layer the frequency of the spin waves is shifted, giving rise to hybrid spin-wave-Meissner-current modes Borst et al. (2023). Superconducting gates, which have been predicted to induce effects related also to the confinement Kharlan et al. (2023) and transport Zhou et al. (2024) of magnons, have potential exploitation in novel magnonic devices Yu and Bauer (2022); Borst et al. (2023). The ability to control the propagation of collective spin wave excitations in magnetic films offers indeed novel paradigms for data processing Chumak et al. (2022). In cavity magnonics, the strong coupling between magnon and photon modes has been observed using either magnetic crystals or films and proposed for exploitation in quantum technologies Lachance-Quirion et al. (2019); Zare Rameshti et al. (2022). Superconducting circuits operated at microwave frequencies have been developed to investigate the hybridization of magnons and photons Huebl et al. (2013); Morris et al. (2017); Hou and Liu (2019); Li et al. (2019); Mandal et al. (2020); Haygood et al. (2021); Baity et al. (2021); Li et al. (2022); Bøttcher et al. (2023), showing that superconductor-ferromagnet trilayer Golovchanskiy et al. (2021a, b); Silaev (2023) and bilayer Ghirri et al. (2023) stacked structures can be exploited to achieve the ultrastrong coupling regime Frisk Kockum et al. (2019). The possibility to span the whole temperature range of YBCO below Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is desirable both for testing the validity of theoretical models and for devising magnonic devices. Considering all these aspects, stacks of YIG/YBCO films represent an interesting case study for both fundamental and applied point of view.

Here we report on microwave transmission measurements carried out on a YIG/YBCO bilayer at different temperatures. Spectra acquired by using a broadband YBCO coplanar waveguide (CPW) above and below Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT allow us to get a first characterizazion of the magnon spectrum in the frequency range of interest. Secondly, transmission spectra acquired with the superconducting resonator at decreasing temperatures show that the increase of the magnon-photon coupling is accompanied by a progressive shift of the anticrossing. We reproduce the trends observed in the experiments with a simple model that includes the interplay between spin wave excitations and Meissner currents, demonstrating that the evolution of the hybrid magnon-photon system can be directly related to the penetration depth of the superconductor.

CPW transmission lines and resonators were fabricated by optical lithography starting from superconducting YBCO films (thickness t=330𝑡330t=330italic_t = 330 nm) deposited on sapphire sup . The central conductor had width w=(17±1)μ𝑤plus-or-minus171𝜇w=(17\pm 1)~{}\muitalic_w = ( 17 ± 1 ) italic_μm and separation s=(14±1)μ𝑠plus-or-minus141𝜇s=(14\pm 1)~{}\muitalic_s = ( 14 ± 1 ) italic_μm from the lateral ground planes; the length was l=6𝑙6l=6italic_l = 6 mm (Fig. 1(a,b)). Electromagnetic simulations Ghirri et al. (2023) show that the microwave field is confined within a few tens of μm𝜇m\mu\mathrm{m}italic_μ roman_m above the YBCO surface (Fig. 1(b)). The transmission (S21subscript𝑆21S_{21}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) spectrum of the bare resonator shows a half-wavelength fundamental mode whose frequency is ωc(0)/2π=10.1GHzsubscript𝜔𝑐02𝜋10.1GHz\omega_{c}(0)/2\pi=10.1~{}\mathrm{GHz}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ) / 2 italic_π = 10.1 roman_GHz at the chosen reference temperature T0=10subscript𝑇010T_{0}=10italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 10 K (Inset in Fig. 1(c)). The fundamental mode frequency progressively decreases with increasing temperature up to Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (Fig. 1(c)).

From the standard theory of distributed element transmission lines, the frequency of the resonator results in ωc/2π=1/(2lLC)subscript𝜔𝑐2𝜋12𝑙𝐿𝐶\omega_{c}/2\pi=1/(2l\sqrt{LC})italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 2 italic_π = 1 / ( 2 italic_l square-root start_ARG italic_L italic_C end_ARG ), where C𝐶Citalic_C and L=Lg+Lk𝐿subscript𝐿𝑔subscript𝐿𝑘L=L_{g}+L_{k}italic_L = italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are respectively the capacitance and the inductance per unit length, the latter given by the sum of the geometric (Lgsubscript𝐿𝑔L_{g}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) and kinetic (Lksubscript𝐿𝑘L_{k}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) contributions. Being C𝐶Citalic_C weakly depending on the temperature, the ωc(T)subscript𝜔𝑐𝑇\omega_{c}(T)italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T ) dependence can be accounted to the change in the inductance Vendik et al. (1998); Ghigo et al. (2004)

ωcωc(0)L[λL(T0)]L[λL(T)],subscript𝜔𝑐subscript𝜔𝑐0𝐿delimited-[]subscript𝜆𝐿subscript𝑇0𝐿delimited-[]subscript𝜆𝐿𝑇\omega_{c}\approx\omega_{c}(0)\sqrt{\frac{L[\lambda_{L}(T_{0})]}{L[\lambda_{L}% (T)]}},italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≈ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ) square-root start_ARG divide start_ARG italic_L [ italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ] end_ARG start_ARG italic_L [ italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T ) ] end_ARG end_ARG , (1)

where L𝐿Litalic_L depends, through Lksubscript𝐿𝑘L_{k}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, upon the penetration depth of the superconductor. In the simplest two-fluid binomial approximation, the latter can be expressed as Prozorov and Giannetta (2006)

λL=λL(0)1(TTc)p,subscript𝜆𝐿subscript𝜆𝐿01superscript𝑇subscript𝑇𝑐𝑝\displaystyle\lambda_{L}=\frac{\lambda_{L}(0)}{\sqrt{1-\left(\frac{T}{T_{c}}% \right)^{p}}},italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG 1 - ( divide start_ARG italic_T end_ARG start_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG , (2)

where λL(0)subscript𝜆𝐿0\lambda_{L}(0)italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ), is the London penetration length in the zero-temperature limit and p=4/3𝑝43p=4/3italic_p = 4 / 3 for d-wave superconductors Prozorov and Giannetta (2006); Vendik et al. (1998); Ghigo et al. (2004). The explicit relation to derive ωcsubscript𝜔𝑐\omega_{c}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT from Eqs. 1 and 2 is reported in sup . The best fit of the experimental data in Fig. 1(c) gives λL(0)=124subscript𝜆𝐿0124\lambda_{L}(0)=124italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ) = 124 nm and Tc=88.0subscript𝑇𝑐88.0T_{c}=88.0italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 88.0 K. These values well match the typical ones reported for high quality YBCO Ghigo et al. (2004).

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Broadband ferromagnetic resonance spectra taken (a) above (90 K) and (b) well below (30 K) the critical temperature of YBCO. Transmission data are plotted as derivative with respect to the magnetic field, S21/H0subscript𝑆21subscript𝐻0\partial S_{21}/\partial H_{0}∂ italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ∂ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Green dashed lines display ωFMRsubscript𝜔𝐹𝑀𝑅\omega_{FMR}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F italic_M italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, while blue dashed lines ω0subscript𝜔0\omega_{0}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (Eq. 3). Inset. S21subscript𝑆21S_{21}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT spectrum acquired at 0.2 T.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: (a-d) Derivative S21/H0subscript𝑆21subscript𝐻0\partial S_{21}/\partial H_{0}∂ italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ∂ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT data showing the temperature evolution of the coupled spin wave and resonator modes (dataset B). The dash-dot lines indicate ωcsubscript𝜔𝑐\omega_{c}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at each temperature. The dashed lines show ωFMRsubscript𝜔𝐹𝑀𝑅\omega_{FMR}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F italic_M italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (green), ω0subscript𝜔0\omega_{0}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (blue) and the fit of the polaritonic modes Ω±subscriptΩplus-or-minus\Omega_{\pm}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with Eq. 4. (e) Direct comparison between the mode frequencies calculated at different temperatures.

A YIG film with thickness d=5μ𝑑5𝜇d=5~{}\muitalic_d = 5 italic_μm grown on Gadolinium Gallium Garnet substrate (YIG/GGG) was positioned in contact with the YBCO device sup . The external magnetic field was applied in the plane of the superconductor along the direction of the CPW line, 𝐇𝟎=H0x^subscript𝐇0subscript𝐻0^𝑥\mathbf{H_{0}}=H_{0}\hat{x}bold_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_x end_ARG (Fig. 1(a,b)). We first carried out transmission measurements by means of a YBCO broadband CPW line to investigate the magnon spectrum excited by the geometry of this type of antenna. Two spectral maps obtained above and below the observed transition temperature are shown in Fig. 2. Spectrum below Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (Fig. 2(b)) is much richer and shows modes that extend at high frequencies besides a set of resonances that are present also above Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. In the transmission spectrum we can identify an absorption band with characteristic frequencies (Fig. 2(a)). The lower limit of the band is given by the Kittel - or ferromagnetic resonance - frequency Kittel (1948), ωFMR/2π=γμ0H0(H0+Ms)subscript𝜔𝐹𝑀𝑅2𝜋𝛾subscript𝜇0subscript𝐻0subscript𝐻0subscript𝑀𝑠\omega_{FMR}/2\pi=\gamma\mu_{0}\sqrt{H_{0}(H_{0}+M_{s})}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F italic_M italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 2 italic_π = italic_γ italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG, being μ0=4π×107subscript𝜇04𝜋superscript107\mu_{0}=4\pi\times 10^{-7}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4 italic_π × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 7 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT H/m the vacuum permeability and γ=28.02GHz/T𝛾28.02GHzT\gamma=28.02~{}\mathrm{GHz/T}italic_γ = 28.02 roman_GHz / roman_T the electron’s gyromagnetic ratio. The saturation magnetization of YIG, Mssubscript𝑀𝑠M_{s}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, is assumed to vary with temperature Maier-Flaig et al. (2017) between μ0Ms(10K)=0.246subscript𝜇0subscript𝑀𝑠10K0.246\mu_{0}M_{s}(\mathrm{10~{}K})=0.246italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 10 roman_K ) = 0.246 T and μ0Ms(90K)=0.239subscript𝜇0subscript𝑀𝑠90K0.239\mu_{0}M_{s}(\mathrm{90~{}K})=0.239italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 90 roman_K ) = 0.239 T sup .

Besides, we note that maximum absorption coincides with the frequency ω0>ωFMRsubscript𝜔0subscript𝜔𝐹𝑀𝑅\omega_{0}>\omega_{FMR}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F italic_M italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (Inset in Fig. 2(a)). CPW lines with oscillating field 𝐡𝐚𝐜x^perpendicular-tosubscript𝐡𝐚𝐜^𝑥\mathbf{h_{ac}}\perp\hat{x}bold_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_ac end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ over^ start_ARG italic_x end_ARG can excite spin wave modes having wavenumber ky2π/ssubscript𝑘𝑦2𝜋𝑠k_{y}\approx 2\pi/sitalic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≈ 2 italic_π / italic_s Maksymov and Kostylev (2015). According to the seminal work of Kalinikos and Slavin (KS) for a YIG film Kalinikos and Slavin (1986), in this geometry the spectrum of spin wave modes consists of the lowest dipole-dominated mode characterized by a quasi-uniform thickness profile and higher exchange-dominated spin wave resonance (SWR) modes sup . The lowest mode can be described by:

ω0/2π==μ0γH0(H0+Ms)+(Ms)2P00(kyd)(1P00(kyd)),subscript𝜔02𝜋subscript𝜇0𝛾subscript𝐻0subscript𝐻0subscript𝑀𝑠superscriptsubscript𝑀𝑠2subscript𝑃00subscript𝑘𝑦𝑑1subscript𝑃00subscript𝑘𝑦𝑑\displaystyle\begin{split}&\omega_{0}/2\pi=\\ &=\mu_{0}\gamma\sqrt{H_{0}(H_{0}+M_{s})+(M_{s})^{2}P_{00}(k_{y}d)\left(1-P_{00% }(k_{y}d)\right)},\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 2 italic_π = end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ square-root start_ARG italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + ( italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 00 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d ) ( 1 - italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 00 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d ) ) end_ARG , end_CELL end_ROW (3)

that for kyd1much-less-thansubscript𝑘𝑦𝑑1k_{y}d\ll 1italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d ≪ 1 is similar to the Damon-Eshbach expression Demokritov and Slavin (2021); Ghirri et al. (2023). In Eq. 3, kysubscript𝑘𝑦k_{y}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the wavevector of the spin wave mode and P00=1+[(1exp(kyd))/kyd]subscript𝑃001delimited-[]1subscript𝑘𝑦𝑑subscript𝑘𝑦𝑑P_{00}=1+[(1-\exp(-k_{y}d))/k_{y}d]italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 00 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 + [ ( 1 - roman_exp ( start_ARG - italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_ARG ) ) / italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d ] Demokritov and Slavin (2021). As shown in Fig. 2(a), ω0subscript𝜔0\omega_{0}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT can reproduce the position of the transmission minimum as a function of the magnetic field. From the direct comparison between Eq. 3 and the experimental data, we obtain ky=3×105radm1subscript𝑘𝑦3superscript105radsuperscriptm1k_{y}=3\times 10^{5}~{}\mathrm{rad~{}m}^{-1}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_rad roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, consistently with our geometrical factors, i.e. ky2π/ssubscript𝑘𝑦2𝜋𝑠k_{y}\approx 2\pi/sitalic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≈ 2 italic_π / italic_s Maksymov and Kostylev (2015).

As the temperature decreases below Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (Fig. 2(b)), ω0subscript𝜔0\omega_{0}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is nearly temperature independent. By using ky=3×105radm1subscript𝑘𝑦3superscript105radsuperscriptm1k_{y}=3\times 10^{5}~{}\mathrm{rad~{}m}^{-1}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_rad roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT we can be reproduce ω0(H0)subscript𝜔0subscript𝐻0\omega_{0}(H_{0})italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) in the whole 10-90 K temperature range, because Eq. 3 weakly depends from temperature through Mssubscript𝑀𝑠M_{s}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT sup . Yet, the main differences between panel (a) and (b) are related to the presence of an absorption band that progressively widens below Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, showing a progressively increasing number of spin wave resonance modes at frequencies ω>ω0𝜔subscript𝜔0\omega>\omega_{0}italic_ω > italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as a result of the occurrence of superconductivity in the YBCO layer. However, the complexity of the experimental spectra maps makes it difficult to the discern between unperturbed features of the YIG film and those due to the interplay with the superconductor sup .

The spectral maps show more distinguishable features when the same YIG film is positioned on the CPW resonator (Fig. 3). Note that, in this second set of experiments, the CPW resonator has the same lateral dimensions as the broadband CPW line used in the previous experiments. We can recognise a clear trend of the spectrum as temperature decreases. At T=87𝑇87T=87italic_T = 87 K the resonator mode is not visible but weak absorption lines can be noticed due to the magnetic film. In Fig. 3(a) we can identify the Kittel mode, ωFMRsubscript𝜔𝐹𝑀𝑅\omega_{FMR}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F italic_M italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and the quasi-uniform thickness mode, ω0subscript𝜔0\omega_{0}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Consistently with data in Fig. 2, the latter can be reproduced by Eq. 3 with ky=3×105radm1subscript𝑘𝑦3superscript105radsuperscriptm1k_{y}=3\times 10^{5}~{}\mathrm{rad~{}m}^{-1}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_rad roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. At T=85𝑇85T=85italic_T = 85 K, the resonator mode appears with frequency ωc/2π7.4subscript𝜔𝑐2𝜋7.4\omega_{c}/2\pi\approx 7.4italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 2 italic_π ≈ 7.4 GHz (Fig. 3(b)). Due to the permittivity of the YIG/GGG sample, this value is lower than what was obtained at the same temperature using the bare resonator. The spectral map here shows two polaritonic branches as a result of the hybridization between magnons and photons. Below 77 K, the fundamental mode frequency increases and the splitting (2g𝑔gitalic_g) between the two branches progressively increases up to the maximum value at the lowest temperature (Fig. 3(c,d)). This temperature-dependent widening of the anticrossing gap is determined by the progressive displacement of the polariton branches towards higher frequencies and by the shift of the upper polariton towards lower magnetic fields. As shown in sup , these trends have been reproduced in another dataset and obtained also with a different resonator. They can be ascribed to the occurrence of the superconductivity in the YBCO layer Golovchanskiy et al. (2021b, 2023); Ghirri et al. (2023), as quantified in the following.

We model the physical system comprising of resonator modes interacting with collective spin wave excitations on the basis of a modified Hopfield Hamiltonian, whose eigenvalues reads Ghirri et al. (2023)

Ω±=12ω~c2+ωb2±(ω~c2ωb2)2+16ωcωbg2,subscriptΩplus-or-minus12plus-or-minussuperscriptsubscript~𝜔𝑐2superscriptsubscript𝜔𝑏2superscriptsuperscriptsubscript~𝜔𝑐2superscriptsubscript𝜔𝑏2216subscript𝜔𝑐subscript𝜔𝑏superscript𝑔2\Omega_{\pm}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\sqrt{\tilde{\omega}_{c}^{2}+\omega_{b}^{2}\pm% \sqrt{\left(\tilde{\omega}_{c}^{2}-\omega_{b}^{2}\right)^{2}+16\omega_{c}% \omega_{b}g^{2}}}~{},roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG square-root start_ARG over~ start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± square-root start_ARG ( over~ start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 16 italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG , (4)

where ω~c=ωc(ωc+4β)subscript~𝜔𝑐subscript𝜔𝑐subscript𝜔𝑐4𝛽\tilde{\omega}_{c}=\sqrt{\omega_{c}(\omega_{c}+4\beta)}over~ start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 4 italic_β ) end_ARG, being β𝛽\betaitalic_β the diamagnetic term that, however, we take vanishingly small. In Eq. 4 we consider a single magnetic mode coupled to the resonator Ghirri et al. (2023), whose frequency is

ωb=ω0+δsc,subscript𝜔𝑏subscript𝜔0subscript𝛿𝑠𝑐\omega_{b}=\omega_{0}+\delta_{sc},italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (5)

being ω0subscript𝜔0\omega_{0}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT the frequency of the lowest YIG mode (Eq. 3) and δscsubscript𝛿𝑠𝑐\delta_{sc}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT the temperature-dependent shift. ωbsubscript𝜔𝑏\omega_{b}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT corresponds to the frequency of the effective magnon mode that best couple with the superconducting resonator. Neglecting dissipative effects in the superconductor in first instance, the frequency shift δscsubscript𝛿𝑠𝑐\delta_{sc}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT can be quantified by self-consistently including the spin-wave induced Meissner currents in the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation to obtain Borst et al. (2023)

δscγμ0Mskydr1e2tλL(kyλL+1)2(kyλL1)2e2tλL,subscript𝛿𝑠𝑐𝛾subscript𝜇0subscript𝑀𝑠subscript𝑘𝑦𝑑𝑟1superscript𝑒2𝑡subscript𝜆𝐿superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑦subscript𝜆𝐿12superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑦subscript𝜆𝐿12superscript𝑒2𝑡subscript𝜆𝐿\delta_{sc}\approx\gamma\mu_{0}M_{s}k_{y}dr\frac{1-e^{-\frac{2t}{\lambda_{L}}}% }{(k_{y}\lambda_{L}+1)^{2}-(k_{y}\lambda_{L}-1)^{2}e^{-\frac{2t}{\lambda_{L}}}},italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≈ italic_γ italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_r divide start_ARG 1 - italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 2 italic_t end_ARG start_ARG italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 2 italic_t end_ARG start_ARG italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (6)

where r𝑟ritalic_r is a dimensionless geometrical factor.

The polaritonic branches (Eq. 4) depend on temperature also through the frequency of the resonator (Eq. 1). Additionally, the spin-photon coupling is Tosi et al. (2014)

gs=14γbvacμ0ωc4whZ0,subscript𝑔𝑠14𝛾subscript𝑏𝑣𝑎𝑐subscript𝜇0subscript𝜔𝑐4𝑤subscript𝑍0g_{s}=\frac{1}{4}\gamma b_{vac}\approx\frac{\mu_{0}\omega_{c}}{4w}\sqrt{\frac{% h}{Z_{0}}},italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG italic_γ italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v italic_a italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≈ divide start_ARG italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_w end_ARG square-root start_ARG divide start_ARG italic_h end_ARG start_ARG italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG , (7)

being bvacsubscript𝑏𝑣𝑎𝑐b_{vac}italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v italic_a italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT the vacuum magnetic field of the resonator and Z0=58Ωsubscript𝑍058ΩZ_{0}=58~{}\mathrm{\Omega}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 58 roman_Ω is the nominal impedance of the CPW line. Eq. 7 also depends from the temperature through ωcsubscript𝜔𝑐\omega_{c}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

We used Eq. 4 to reproduce the magnetic field dispersion of the polaritonic branches (dataset A in sup and dataset B in Fig. 3) and to fix key values of the problem. We considered ωcsubscript𝜔𝑐\omega_{c}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and δscsubscript𝛿𝑠𝑐\delta_{sc}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT free parameters, whereas the collective coupling strength g=gs2sFeNs𝑔subscript𝑔𝑠2subscript𝑠Fesubscript𝑁𝑠g=g_{s}\sqrt{2s_{\mathrm{Fe}}N_{s}}italic_g = italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG 2 italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Fe end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG, being sFe=5/2subscript𝑠Fe52s_{\mathrm{Fe}}=5/2italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Fe end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5 / 2 the single-ion spin of Fe3+, was calculated using the number of spins (Nssubscript𝑁𝑠N_{s}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT), which was assumed to be temperature-independent for each dataset. Following this approach, we reproduced the evolution of the polaritons in Fig. 3, as well as in the additional spectral maps shown in sup . Panel (e) summarizes the temperature evolution of the relevant modes: as the temperature is lowered we note that ωbsubscript𝜔𝑏\omega_{b}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT shifts towards lower magnetic fields much faster than ω0subscript𝜔0\omega_{0}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and ωFMRsubscript𝜔𝐹𝑀𝑅\omega_{FMR}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F italic_M italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Additional modes visible in panels (a-d) can be attributed to the coupling between spin waves and the higher mode of the resonator at 10.5GHzabsent10.5GHz\approx 10.5~{}\mathrm{GHz}≈ 10.5 roman_GHz, as discussed more in detail in sup .

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (a) Temperature dependence of the parameters obtained from the fit. The circle and triangle symbols indicate the parameters extracted respectively for datasets A and B; solid lines show the calculated curves. The vertical scale is normalized to ωcA(0)/2π=9.19superscriptsubscript𝜔𝑐𝐴02𝜋9.19\omega_{c}^{A}(0)/2\pi=9.19italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) / 2 italic_π = 9.19 GHz, gA(0)/2π=1.72superscript𝑔𝐴02𝜋1.72g^{A}(0)/2\pi=1.72italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) / 2 italic_π = 1.72 GHz and δscA(0)/2π=1.12superscriptsubscript𝛿𝑠𝑐𝐴02𝜋1.12\delta_{sc}^{A}(0)/2\pi=1.12italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) / 2 italic_π = 1.12 GHz for dataset A, ωcB(0)/2π=8.86superscriptsubscript𝜔𝑐𝐵02𝜋8.86\omega_{c}^{B}(0)/2\pi=8.86italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) / 2 italic_π = 8.86 GHz, gB(0)/2π=1.77superscript𝑔𝐵02𝜋1.77g^{B}(0)/2\pi=1.77italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) / 2 italic_π = 1.77 GHz and δscB(0)/2π=1.21superscriptsubscript𝛿𝑠𝑐𝐵02𝜋1.21\delta_{sc}^{B}(0)/2\pi=1.21italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) / 2 italic_π = 1.21 GHz for dataset B. The number of spins resulted in NsA=0.93×1015superscriptsubscript𝑁𝑠𝐴0.93superscript1015N_{s}^{A}=0.93\times 10^{15}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.93 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and NsB=1.05×1015superscriptsubscript𝑁𝑠𝐵1.05superscript1015N_{s}^{B}=1.05\times 10^{15}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1.05 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. (b) Comparison between the normalized frequency shift and the curves obtained from Eq. 6 with different wavenumber kysubscript𝑘𝑦k_{y}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

We now turn our attention to the temperature dependence of the parameters ωcsubscript𝜔𝑐\omega_{c}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, g𝑔gitalic_g and δscsubscript𝛿𝑠𝑐\delta_{sc}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT obtained from the comparison between Eq. 4 and the experimental spectra (Fig. 4(a)). We used Eq. 1 to fit the temperature dependence of ωcsubscript𝜔𝑐\omega_{c}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT: λL(0)subscript𝜆𝐿0\lambda_{L}(0)italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ) and p𝑝pitalic_p were kept fixed to the values determined for the bare resonator while Tc=86.9Ksubscript𝑇𝑐86.9KT_{c}=86.9~{}\mathrm{K}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 86.9 roman_K is obtained. Furthermore, the collective coupling strength (g𝑔gitalic_g) can be easily reproduced using Eq. 7 along with the fitted values of ωcsubscript𝜔𝑐\omega_{c}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the number of spins Ns1×1015subscript𝑁𝑠1superscript1015N_{s}\approx 1\times 10^{15}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≈ 1 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (Fig. 4(a)). Note that the maximum value of the collective coupling g(0)/2π1.7GHz>ωc(0)/10𝑔02𝜋1.7GHzsubscript𝜔𝑐010g(0)/2\pi\approx 1.7~{}\mathrm{GHz}>\omega_{c}(0)/10italic_g ( 0 ) / 2 italic_π ≈ 1.7 roman_GHz > italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ) / 10 confirms that the ultrastrong coupling regime is achieved Frisk Kockum et al. (2019); Ghirri et al. (2023).

Interestingly, the evolution of the frequency shift parameter δscsubscript𝛿𝑠𝑐\delta_{sc}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, shows a well-defined temperature dependence: δscsubscript𝛿𝑠𝑐\delta_{sc}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is small for TTcless-than-or-similar-to𝑇subscript𝑇𝑐T\lesssim T_{c}italic_T ≲ italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, conversely for TTcmuch-less-than𝑇subscript𝑇𝑐T\ll T_{c}italic_T ≪ italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT the frequency shift saturates to the maximum value δsc(0)/2π1.11.2subscript𝛿𝑠𝑐02𝜋1.11.2\delta_{sc}(0)/2\pi\approx 1.1-1.2italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ) / 2 italic_π ≈ 1.1 - 1.2 GHz (Fig. 4(a)). In the two-fluid model of the superconductor, the dissipation due to normal electrons is related to the real part of the complex conductivity σ(ω)=σ1(ω)iσ2(ω)𝜎𝜔subscript𝜎1𝜔𝑖subscript𝜎2𝜔\sigma(\omega)=\sigma_{1}(\omega)-i\sigma_{2}(\omega)italic_σ ( italic_ω ) = italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω ) - italic_i italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω ). For YBCO films with thickness on the order of few hundred nanometers, the expected σ1/σ2subscript𝜎1subscript𝜎2\sigma_{1}/\sigma_{2}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ratio is of the order of one tenth or less just below Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Krupka et al. (2013); sup thus supporting the validity of the non-dissipative approximation. With Eq. 6 we calculate the temperature dependence of δscsubscript𝛿𝑠𝑐\delta_{sc}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT by using the penetration depth estimated with Eq. 2 and the previously reported values of λL(0)subscript𝜆𝐿0\lambda_{L}(0)italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ), Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and p𝑝pitalic_p. Additionally, we use ky=3×105radm1subscript𝑘𝑦3superscript105radsuperscriptm1k_{y}=3\times 10^{5}~{}\mathrm{rad~{}m}^{-1}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_rad roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as obtained from the fit of the spectra in Fig. 2 and 3. Note that the temperature dependence of Eq. 6 mainly derives from the temperature dependence of the penetration depth (Eq. 2) and, only partially from the weak temperature dependence of the saturation magnetization in this range sup .

Fig. 4(a) shows that Eq. 6 successfully reproduce the temperature dependence of the fitted values of δscsubscript𝛿𝑠𝑐\delta_{sc}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. To further test the comparison between Eq. 6 and the values of δscsubscript𝛿𝑠𝑐\delta_{sc}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT derived from the fit, in Fig. 4(b) we plot the frequency shift calculated for different wavenumbers kysubscript𝑘𝑦k_{y}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The excellent match with ky=3×105radm1subscript𝑘𝑦3superscript105radsuperscriptm1k_{y}=3\times 10^{5}~{}\mathrm{rad~{}m}^{-1}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_rad roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT confirms the consistency of our results. The validity of this analysis is supported also by the results obtained with a YBCO resonator having different geometrical parameters sup .

To summarize, we have studied the temperature dependence of transmission spectra acquired on a YIG/YBCO bilayer system. Below Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and with decreasing temperatures, the magnon-photon polaritons are progressively shifted due, primarily, to the increase of the resonator frequency that determines also the increase of the coupling strength. Furthermore, we have observed that the anticrossing is not centered on the unperturbed mode of the YIG film, but is progressively displaced up to more than 1 GHz at low temperature. Both effects are essentially governed by the temperature dependence of the penetration depth, the latter in particular follows the trend expected from the interplay between spin waves and Meissner currents.

The excellent fit of the simulated curves to the experimental behavior confirms the efficiency of the two-fluid model to account for the non-dissipative interplay between magnetic excitations and an adjacent superconducting layer. Line broadening or microscopic visualization of the mixed state of the superconductor will certainly require to consider dissipative effects that can be included in the LLG equation at least in a phenomenological way Borst et al. (2023). Considering the recent proposals to exploit the diamagnetism of superconductors to gate the wave propagation in planar magnonic devices Borst et al. (2023); Yu and Bauer (2022); Zhou et al. (2024), and our results that demonstrate the achievement of large coupling strengths and shifts of the magnon mode even at liquid nitrogen temperatures, we foresee the possibility to use high-Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT superconductors in the context of superconducting magnonics.

Acknowledgements.
This work was partially supported by the European Community through FET Open SUPERGALAX project (grant agreement No. 863313); by NATO Science for Peace and Security Programme (NATO SPS Project No. G5859) and by US. Office of Naval Research award N62909-23-1-2079.

References

Supplemental material

.1 Experimental methods

Coplanar waveguide (CPW) resonators and transmission lines were fabricated by optical lithography and etching with Ar plasma in a reactive ion etching (RIE) chamber starting from Au (200 nm)/YBCO (330 nm)/sapphire (430 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm) films produced by Ceraco GmbH (M-type) and diced into 8×5mm285superscriptmm28\times 5~{}\mathrm{mm}^{2}8 × 5 roman_mm start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT chips. The YBCO surface was exposed to oxygen plasma as a final step of the fabrication procedure. Gold pads defined at the edge of the chip were used to facilitate the bonding to an external printed circuit board.

Transmission spectra were acquired as a function of the microwave frequency by means of a vector network analyzer, which is connected to the printed circuit board by coaxial cables whose insertion loss was removed from transmission data. The estimated incident power considering line attenuation is Pinc15subscript𝑃𝑖𝑛𝑐15P_{inc}\approx-15italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_n italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≈ - 15 dBm. The YIG/GGG film was placed on the YBCO surface and kept in position thanks to a plastic screw that gently pushed the GGG substrate from the backside Ghirri et al. (2023). The experiments were carried out in a variable temperature cryostat equipped with a superconducting solenoid for the generation of the static magnetic field.

.2 Temperature dependence of the saturation magnetization

The saturation magnetization of YIG (Mssubscript𝑀𝑠M_{s}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) is expected to be weakly dependent on temperature in the 10-90 K range. Following Refs. Solt (2004); Maier-Flaig et al. (2017), we assume that its temperature behavior is given by

Ms=M0(1uT3/2vT5/2),subscript𝑀𝑠subscript𝑀01𝑢superscript𝑇32𝑣superscript𝑇52M_{s}=M_{0}(1-uT^{3/2}-vT^{5/2}),italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 - italic_u italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_v italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , (1)

where u=23×106K3/2𝑢23superscript106superscriptK32u=23\times 10^{-6}~{}\mathrm{K^{-3/2}}italic_u = 23 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and v=1.08×107K5/2𝑣1.08superscript107superscriptK52v=1.08\times 10^{-7}~{}\mathrm{K^{-5/2}}italic_v = 1.08 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 7 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 5 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Maier-Flaig et al. (2017). In our case we used μ0M0=0.253subscript𝜇0subscript𝑀00.253\mu_{0}M_{0}=0.253italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.253 T.

.3 Modelization of the CPW resonator

To transmission spectrum of the CPW resonators can be reproduced with Hein (1999)

S21=10IL/201+QL2(ω/ωcωc/ω)2,subscript𝑆21superscript10𝐼𝐿201superscriptsubscript𝑄𝐿2superscript𝜔subscript𝜔𝑐subscript𝜔𝑐𝜔2S_{21}=\frac{10^{-IL/20}}{\sqrt{1+Q_{L}^{2}(\omega/\omega_{c}-\omega_{c}/% \omega)^{2}}},italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_I italic_L / 20 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG 1 + italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_ω / italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG , (2)

where ωcsubscript𝜔𝑐\omega_{c}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the fundamental mode frequency, QLsubscript𝑄𝐿Q_{L}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the loaded quality factor and IL𝐼𝐿ILitalic_I italic_L is the insertion loss. The values obtained at 10 K are ωc/2π=10.097subscript𝜔𝑐2𝜋10.097\omega_{c}/2\pi=10.097italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 2 italic_π = 10.097 GHz, QL=3628.4subscript𝑄𝐿3628.4Q_{L}=3628.4italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3628.4 and IL=19.768𝐼𝐿19.768IL=19.768italic_I italic_L = 19.768 dB (Inset in Fig. 1(c) of the Letter).

Following Ref. Ghigo et al. (2004), the temperature dependence of the frequency of the resonator (ωcsubscript𝜔𝑐\omega_{c}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) can be evaluated as

ωc(T)=ωc(0)L(T0)C(T0)L(T)C(T),subscript𝜔𝑐𝑇subscript𝜔𝑐0𝐿subscript𝑇0𝐶subscript𝑇0𝐿𝑇𝐶𝑇\displaystyle\omega_{c}(T)=\omega_{c}(0)\sqrt{\frac{L(T_{0})C(T_{0})}{L(T)C(T)% }},italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T ) = italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ) square-root start_ARG divide start_ARG italic_L ( italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_C ( italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_L ( italic_T ) italic_C ( italic_T ) end_ARG end_ARG , (3)

where ωc(0)=ωc(T0)subscript𝜔𝑐0subscript𝜔𝑐subscript𝑇0\omega_{c}(0)=\omega_{c}(T_{0})italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ) = italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) and T0=10subscript𝑇010T_{0}=10italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 10 K. Here L𝐿Litalic_L and C𝐶Citalic_C are respectively the inductance and the capacitance per unit length. By neglecting the weak temperature variations of the latter Ghigo et al. (2004), we obtain

ωc(T)ωc(0)L(T0)L(T)=ωc(0)Lg+Lk[λL(T0)]Lg+Lk[λL(T)],subscript𝜔𝑐𝑇subscript𝜔𝑐0𝐿subscript𝑇0𝐿𝑇subscript𝜔𝑐0subscript𝐿𝑔subscript𝐿𝑘delimited-[]subscript𝜆𝐿subscript𝑇0subscript𝐿𝑔subscript𝐿𝑘delimited-[]subscript𝜆𝐿𝑇\displaystyle\omega_{c}(T)\approx\omega_{c}(0)\sqrt{\frac{L(T_{0})}{L(T)}}=% \omega_{c}(0)\sqrt{\frac{L_{g}+L_{k}[\lambda_{L}(T_{0})]}{L_{g}+L_{k}[\lambda_% {L}(T)]}},italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T ) ≈ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ) square-root start_ARG divide start_ARG italic_L ( italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_L ( italic_T ) end_ARG end_ARG = italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ) square-root start_ARG divide start_ARG italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ] end_ARG start_ARG italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T ) ] end_ARG end_ARG , (4)

being Lgsubscript𝐿𝑔L_{g}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Lksubscript𝐿𝑘L_{k}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT the geometric and kinetic inductance per unit length, respectively. The geometric inductance is temperature independent and reads Lancaster (1997)

Lg=μ0K(1(w/a)2)4K(w/a)subscript𝐿𝑔subscript𝜇0𝐾1superscript𝑤𝑎24𝐾𝑤𝑎L_{g}=\mu_{0}\frac{K(\sqrt{1-(w/a)^{2}})}{4K(w/a)}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_K ( square-root start_ARG 1 - ( italic_w / italic_a ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_K ( italic_w / italic_a ) end_ARG (5)

where K𝐾Kitalic_K is the complete elliptic integral and a=w+2s𝑎𝑤2𝑠a=w+2sitalic_a = italic_w + 2 italic_s. Conversely, the kinetic inductance depends on the temperature through the penetration depth (Eq. 2 in the Letter). For a CPW line, Lksubscript𝐿𝑘L_{k}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT can be written as Vendik et al. (1998)

Lk=μ0dweff(λL)λL2,subscript𝐿𝑘subscript𝜇0𝑑subscript𝑤𝑒𝑓𝑓subscript𝜆𝐿superscriptsubscript𝜆𝐿2L_{k}=\frac{\mu_{0}}{dw_{eff}(\lambda_{L})}\lambda_{L}^{2},italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (6)

where

1weff=1w(C1+C2).1subscript𝑤𝑒𝑓𝑓1𝑤subscript𝐶1subscript𝐶2\frac{1}{w_{eff}}=\frac{1}{w}(C_{1}+C_{2}).divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_w end_ARG ( italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) . (7)

The expressions for the coefficients C1subscript𝐶1C_{1}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and C2subscript𝐶2C_{2}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are

C1=subscript𝐶1absent\displaystyle C_{1}=italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2[K(wa)]211(wa)22superscriptdelimited-[]𝐾𝑤𝑎211superscript𝑤𝑎2\displaystyle\frac{2}{[K(\frac{w}{a})]^{2}}\frac{1}{1-(\frac{w}{a})^{2}}divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG [ italic_K ( divide start_ARG italic_w end_ARG start_ARG italic_a end_ARG ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 1 - ( divide start_ARG italic_w end_ARG start_ARG italic_a end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG (8)
[1+14ln(wλL,1)w4aln(a+w2λL,aw+2λL,)]delimited-[]114𝑤subscript𝜆𝐿perpendicular-to1𝑤4𝑎𝑎𝑤2subscript𝜆𝐿perpendicular-to𝑎𝑤2subscript𝜆𝐿perpendicular-to\displaystyle\left[1+\frac{1}{4}\ln(\frac{w}{\lambda_{L,\perp}}-1)-\frac{w}{4a% }\ln(\frac{a+w-2\lambda_{L,\perp}}{a-w+2\lambda_{L,\perp}})\right][ 1 + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG roman_ln ( start_ARG divide start_ARG italic_w end_ARG start_ARG italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L , ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG - 1 end_ARG ) - divide start_ARG italic_w end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_a end_ARG roman_ln ( start_ARG divide start_ARG italic_a + italic_w - 2 italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L , ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a - italic_w + 2 italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L , ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG ) ] (9)

and

C2=subscript𝐶2absent\displaystyle C_{2}=italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2[K(wa)]2wa1(wa)22superscriptdelimited-[]𝐾𝑤𝑎2𝑤𝑎1superscript𝑤𝑎2\displaystyle\frac{2}{[K(\frac{w}{a})]^{2}}\frac{\frac{w}{a}}{1-(\frac{w}{a})^% {2}}divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG [ italic_K ( divide start_ARG italic_w end_ARG start_ARG italic_a end_ARG ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG divide start_ARG italic_w end_ARG start_ARG italic_a end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG 1 - ( divide start_ARG italic_w end_ARG start_ARG italic_a end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG (10)
[1+14ln(aλL,+1)a4wln(a+w2λL,aw+2λL,)],delimited-[]114𝑎subscript𝜆𝐿perpendicular-to1𝑎4𝑤𝑎𝑤2subscript𝜆𝐿perpendicular-to𝑎𝑤2subscript𝜆𝐿perpendicular-to\displaystyle\left[1+\frac{1}{4}\ln(\frac{a}{\lambda_{L,\perp}}+1)-\frac{a}{4w% }\ln(\frac{a+w-2\lambda_{L,\perp}}{a-w+2\lambda_{L,\perp}})\right],[ 1 + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG roman_ln ( start_ARG divide start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_ARG italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L , ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG + 1 end_ARG ) - divide start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_w end_ARG roman_ln ( start_ARG divide start_ARG italic_a + italic_w - 2 italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L , ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a - italic_w + 2 italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L , ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG ) ] , (11)

being λL,=2λL2/tsubscript𝜆𝐿perpendicular-to2superscriptsubscript𝜆𝐿2𝑡\lambda_{L,\perp}=2\lambda_{L}^{2}/titalic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L , ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_t Ghigo et al. (2004).

.4 Dissipation and decay of the magnetic field in the superconducting layer

According to the two-fluid model, the conductivity of the superconductor is σ(ω)=σ1(ω)iσ2(ω)𝜎𝜔subscript𝜎1𝜔𝑖subscript𝜎2𝜔\sigma(\omega)=\sigma_{1}(\omega)-i\sigma_{2}(\omega)italic_σ ( italic_ω ) = italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω ) - italic_i italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω ), where σ1subscript𝜎1\sigma_{1}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is responsible for the dissipation and fully describes the conductivity above Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, while σ2subscript𝜎2\sigma_{2}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is responsible for the kinetic inductance. In the normal state the skin depth of the electromagnetic field can be defined as δs=2/ωμ0σ1subscript𝛿𝑠2𝜔subscript𝜇0subscript𝜎1\delta_{s}=\sqrt{2/\omega\mu_{0}\sigma_{1}}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG 2 / italic_ω italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG.

Data reported in ref. Krupka et al. (2013) for 280 nm thick YBCO/sapphire films at 28.2 GHz, indicate that σ1subscript𝜎1\sigma_{1}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is in the range between 0.5×1060.5superscript1060.5\times 10^{6}0.5 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and 1.2×1061.2superscript1061.2\times 10^{6}1.2 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT S/m, while σ2subscript𝜎2\sigma_{2}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT rapidly increases from 4×106absent4superscript106\approx 4\times 10^{6}≈ 4 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT S/m at TTc𝑇subscript𝑇𝑐T\approx T_{c}italic_T ≈ italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to saturate at 4×107absent4superscript107\approx 4\times 10^{7}≈ 4 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 7 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT S/m at 13 K. The ratio σ1/σ2subscript𝜎1subscript𝜎2\sigma_{1}/\sigma_{2}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT results between 0.33 and 0.12 from Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to 83 K, and lower than 0.1 below 83 K. In our experiment, we expect even lower σ1/σ2subscript𝜎1subscript𝜎2\sigma_{1}/\sigma_{2}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ratios due to the higher thickness of the film (t=330𝑡330t=330italic_t = 330 nm) and to the lower frequency of the resonator, ωc(T)subscript𝜔𝑐𝑇\omega_{c}(T)italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T ). We thus neglect σ1subscript𝜎1\sigma_{1}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and assume that the complex conductivity is σ=i/ωμ0λL2(T)𝜎𝑖𝜔subscript𝜇0superscriptsubscript𝜆𝐿2𝑇\sigma=-i/\omega\mu_{0}\lambda_{L}^{2}(T)italic_σ = - italic_i / italic_ω italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_T ) as in the case of a perfect superconductor.

Within the superconducting layer, the decay constant of the magnetic field generated by the spin wave is Borst et al. (2023)

κ=k1+iωμ0σ/k2=k1+2ik2δs(T)2nn(T)n+1k2λL2(T),𝜅𝑘1𝑖𝜔subscript𝜇0𝜎superscript𝑘2𝑘12𝑖superscript𝑘2subscript𝛿𝑠superscript𝑇2subscript𝑛𝑛𝑇𝑛1superscript𝑘2superscriptsubscript𝜆𝐿2𝑇\kappa=k\sqrt{1+i\omega\mu_{0}\sigma/k^{2}}=k\sqrt{1+\frac{2i}{k^{2}\delta_{s}% (T)^{2}}\frac{n_{n}(T)}{n}+\frac{1}{k^{2}\lambda_{L}^{2}(T)}},italic_κ = italic_k square-root start_ARG 1 + italic_i italic_ω italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ / italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = italic_k square-root start_ARG 1 + divide start_ARG 2 italic_i end_ARG start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_n end_ARG + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_T ) end_ARG end_ARG , (12)

where nn(T)/nsubscript𝑛𝑛𝑇𝑛n_{n}(T)/nitalic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T ) / italic_n is the fractional number density of normal electrons. The estimated skin depth results δs>10μmsubscript𝛿𝑠10𝜇m\delta_{s}>10~{}\mathrm{\mu m}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 10 italic_μ roman_m at 10 GHz, thus much larger than both the penetration depth in the superconducting state λL(T)subscript𝜆𝐿𝑇\lambda_{L}(T)italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T ) (Fig. 1(c) of the Letter) and the thickness of the YBCO layer. By neglecting the second term under the square root, Eq. 12 results κk2+1/λL2(T)𝜅superscript𝑘21superscriptsubscript𝜆𝐿2𝑇\kappa\approx\sqrt{k^{2}+1/\lambda_{L}^{2}(T)}italic_κ ≈ square-root start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 / italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_T ) end_ARG thus, considering that in our experiment k2λL2(T)1much-less-thansuperscript𝑘2superscriptsubscript𝜆𝐿2𝑇1k^{2}\lambda_{L}^{2}(T)\ll 1italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_T ) ≪ 1, we finally obtain κ1/λL(T)𝜅1subscript𝜆𝐿𝑇\kappa\approx 1/\lambda_{L}(T)italic_κ ≈ 1 / italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T ).

Refer to caption
Figure S1: (a) Temperature evolution of the S21subscript𝑆21S_{21}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT spectra of the YIG film acquired by using the YBCO CPW broadband line (H0=0.2subscript𝐻00.2H_{0}=0.2italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.2 T). (b-e) Spectral maps acquired at different temperatures. (f) Frequency of the spin wave resonance modes calculated with Eq. 14 as a function of the mode number j𝑗jitalic_j.

.5 Higher spin wave resonance modes

The spectral maps in Fig. S1(a-e) display a series of the spectra of the YIG film acquired by means of the YBCO broadband CPW line with the static magnetic field applied perpendicular to the plane containing the oscillating magnetic field as in Fig. 1 of the Letter (Damon-Eshbach geometry). The spectral maps are characterized by a transmission dip with the presence of several closely spaced lines. At 90 K the spin wave resonance modes are approximately found between ω0subscript𝜔0\omega_{0}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and ωFMRsubscript𝜔𝐹𝑀𝑅\omega_{FMR}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F italic_M italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT; at 85 K and below many additional modes appear at frequency also above ω0subscript𝜔0\omega_{0}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. We attribute this evolution, which is marked by clear a contrast between the spectra taken above and below Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, to the effect of the superconductor.

We compare these data to the the predictions of the analytic model by Kalinikos and Slavin Kalinikos and Slavin (1986), which describes the dispersion of spin wave resonance (SWR) modes in a magnetic film by including the effects of both dipolar and exchange interactions. Although the effects of the superconductor are not included in this theory, which therefore does not allow the description of the interplay between superconducting and magnetic layer, we can used it to calculate the expected frequencies of the spin wave resonance modes. The lowest (j=0𝑗0j=0italic_j = 0) mode displays a quasi-uniform spin wave amplitude in the thickness of the film; its frequency mostly derives from the dipolar energy and follows Eq. 4 of the Letter, which can be used to fit the experimental spectra and derive the wavenumber ky=3×105rad/msubscript𝑘𝑦3superscript105radmk_{y}=3\times 10^{5}~{}\mathrm{rad/m}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_rad / roman_m (Fig. 2 of the Letter). Higher (j>0𝑗0j>0italic_j > 0) excitations, usually named Perpendicular Standing Spin Wave (PSSW) modes, are determined also by the effect of the exchange interaction and characterized by a finite number of modes for which the spin wave amplitude periodically varies along the film thickness. Assuming unpinned surface spins, the perpendicular wavenumber is kz=jπ/dsubscript𝑘𝑧𝑗𝜋𝑑k_{z}=j\pi/ditalic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_j italic_π / italic_d. The PSSW mode frequencies thus follows Kalinikos and Slavin (1986)

ωj=γμ0(H0+Hex(j))(H0+Hex(j)+MsFjj),subscript𝜔𝑗𝛾subscript𝜇0subscript𝐻0superscriptsubscript𝐻𝑒𝑥𝑗subscript𝐻0superscriptsubscript𝐻𝑒𝑥𝑗subscript𝑀𝑠subscript𝐹𝑗𝑗\omega_{j}=\gamma\mu_{0}\sqrt{\left(H_{0}+H_{ex}^{(j)}\right)\left(H_{0}+H_{ex% }^{(j)}+M_{s}F_{jj}\right)},italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_γ italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG ( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG , (13)

where Hex(j)=2AMs(ky2+(jπd)2)superscriptsubscript𝐻𝑒𝑥𝑗2𝐴subscript𝑀𝑠superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑦2superscript𝑗𝜋𝑑2H_{ex}^{(j)}=\frac{2A}{M_{s}}\left(k_{y}^{2}+\left(\frac{j\pi}{d}\right)^{2}\right)italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 2 italic_A end_ARG start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( divide start_ARG italic_j italic_π end_ARG start_ARG italic_d end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) is the exchange field and Fjjsubscript𝐹𝑗𝑗F_{jj}italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the matrix element of the dipole-dipole interaction. Eq. 13 can be approximated as Demokritov and Slavin (2021)

ωj=γμ0[H0+2AMs(ky2+(jπd)2)][H0+2AMs(ky2+(jπd)2)+Ms+H0(Ms/H0jπ/d)2ky2],subscript𝜔𝑗𝛾subscript𝜇0delimited-[]subscript𝐻02𝐴subscript𝑀𝑠superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑦2superscript𝑗𝜋𝑑2delimited-[]subscript𝐻02𝐴subscript𝑀𝑠superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑦2superscript𝑗𝜋𝑑2subscript𝑀𝑠subscript𝐻0superscript𝑀𝑠subscript𝐻0𝑗𝜋𝑑2superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑦2\omega_{j}=\gamma\mu_{0}\sqrt{\left[H_{0}+\frac{2A}{M_{s}}\left(k_{y}^{2}+% \left(\frac{j\pi}{d}\right)^{2}\right)\right]\left[H_{0}+\frac{2A}{M_{s}}\left% (k_{y}^{2}+\left(\frac{j\pi}{d}\right)^{2}\right)+M_{s}+H_{0}\left(\frac{Ms/H_% {0}}{j\pi/d}\right)^{2}k_{y}^{2}\right]},italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_γ italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG [ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 2 italic_A end_ARG start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( divide start_ARG italic_j italic_π end_ARG start_ARG italic_d end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] [ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 2 italic_A end_ARG start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( divide start_ARG italic_j italic_π end_ARG start_ARG italic_d end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_M italic_s / italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_j italic_π / italic_d end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] end_ARG , (14)

being d𝑑ditalic_d the thickness of the YIG film and A𝐴Aitalic_A the exchange constant Klingler et al. (2014).

We use Eq. 14 to calculate the spin wave mode spectrum by including realistic experimental parameters. We consider the nominal thickness of the YIG film (d=5μm𝑑5𝜇md=5~{}\mathrm{\mu m}italic_d = 5 italic_μ roman_m) and estimate the exchange constant in the temperature range of interest as A5pJ/m𝐴5pJmA\approx 5~{}\mathrm{pJ/m}italic_A ≈ 5 roman_pJ / roman_m Klingler et al. (2014); Zyuzin and Bazhanov (1996). Fig. S1(f) shows the PSSW mode frequencies calculated at 0.2 T as a function of the mode number (j𝑗jitalic_j). Due both to the uncertainty in the value of the exchange constant at low temperature Zyuzin and Bazhanov (1996) and to the difficulty in precisely indexing the large number of SWR modes visible in the spectrum, a quantitative comparison between the experiment and theoretical model is not possible. However, we note that the calculated frequency separation between subsequent modes (panel (f)) is comparable to the pitch observed in the experimental spectra (panels (a-e)). As the mode number increases, the frequency initially jumps from ω0subscript𝜔0\omega_{0}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT down to ωFMRsubscript𝜔𝐹𝑀𝑅\omega_{FMR}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F italic_M italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, then it progressively increases to values much higher than ω0subscript𝜔0\omega_{0}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. On the basis of this analysis, we attribute the resonances observed in the experimental map at 90 K (panel (b)) to the lowest PSSW modes, while those found in the spectra at lower temperatures (panels (c-e)) to higher number PSSW modes, whose progressive appearance as temperature drops is related to the effects of the superconductor.

.6 Additional transmission spectra

Transmission spectra were acquired with a YIG/GGG film having area 3.8×2mm2absent3.82superscriptmm2\approx 3.8\times 2~{}\mathrm{mm}^{2}≈ 3.8 × 2 roman_mm start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, which was positioned in the middle of the YBCO resonator. We collected two datasets in different experimental runs; the measured spectral maps are shown in Fig. S2 (dataset A) and in Fig. 3 of the Letter (dataset B). The two datasets show equivalent features, with minor differences in the absolute value of frequencies and coupling strengths that can be attributed to the slightly different positioning of the YIG film in the two experiments.

.7 Effects of the higher microwave mode

In this section we analyze the spectral features related to the coupling between spin waves and a higher microwave mode. In order to understand these effects, we first analyze the experimental results, we then discuss the outcome of finite-element electromagnetic simulations and finally introduce a model to describe the coupled spin wave - microwave modes.

Transmission spectroscopy data.

Fig. S3 shows a zoom on the spectral maps reported in Fig. 3 of the Letter. The spectra taken in zero applied magnetic field (H0=0subscript𝐻00H_{0}=0italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0) show the presence of a higher microwave mode having frequency of 10.03 GHz at 87 K and 10.35 GHz at 50 K (Fig. S3). This mode is visible also in the spectra of Fig. S2 and in those acquired with the supplemental resonator (Sect. .6). With respect to the fundamental mode of the YBCO CPW resonator (Fig. 1 of the Letter), the frequency of this mode has a weaker dependence from temperature; this discrepancy suggests a different distribution of the microwave field in the two cases.

Refer to caption
Figure S2: Transmission spectral maps showing the evolution of the coupled spin wave and resonator modes at different temperatures (dataset A). The grey scale shows the numerical derivative of the transmission with respect to the magnetic field, S21/H0subscript𝑆21subscript𝐻0\partial S_{21}/\partial H_{0}∂ italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ∂ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The white dash-dot lines indicate the frequency of the resonator at each temperature, while white dotted lines the estimated frequency of the higher microwave mode. The dashed lines show ωFMR(H0)subscript𝜔𝐹𝑀𝑅subscript𝐻0\omega_{FMR}(H_{0})italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F italic_M italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (green), ω0(H0)subscript𝜔0subscript𝐻0\omega_{0}(H_{0})italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (blue), ωb(H0)subscript𝜔𝑏subscript𝐻0\omega_{b}(H_{0})italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (yellow) and the calculated polaritonic modes Ω±(H0)subscriptΩplus-or-minussubscript𝐻0\Omega_{\pm}(H_{0})roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (red).
Refer to caption
Figure S3: Comparison between transmission spectral maps (a-d) measured at different temperatures and (e-d) calculated with Eq. 15. Blue dotted lines indicate the calculated maximum transmission. Solid lines display the magnetic field dependence of the upper polariton (Ω+subscriptΩ\Omega_{+}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT), as discussed in the Letter.

In the presence of an external magnetic field, the spectra evidence the coupling between the higher microwave mode and spin waves. In Fig. S3(a-d) we note the presence of multiple anticrossings, which are characterized by a broad polaritonic branch that converges towards ωFMRsubscript𝜔𝐹𝑀𝑅\omega_{FMR}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F italic_M italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for H00.25subscript𝐻00.25H_{0}\approx 0.25italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≈ 0.25 T and by several satellite lines at lower fields. This behavior closely resembles what obtained by placing the YIG film on a metal microstrip Ghirri et al. (2023) or for ferromagnetic films in a cavity Cao et al. (2015). However, the maps in Fig. S3(a-d) show a number of satellite lines that increases as the main anticrossing related to the fundamental CPW mode gets wider, i.e. as the temperature decreases. We note that at each temperature the position of the upper polariton (Ω+subscriptΩ\Omega_{+}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) sets the lower limit of the multiple anticrossings in Fig. S3.

Refer to caption
Figure S4: Finite-element electromagnetic simulation of the bare resonator. (a) Transmission spectrum calculated between 5 and 12 GHz by approximating the YBCO film as a perfect conductor. (b,c) Distribution of the amplitude of 𝐡𝐚𝐜subscript𝐡𝐚𝐜\mathbf{h_{ac}}bold_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_ac end_POSTSUBSCRIPT calculated respectively for the modes at 10.039 and 10.516 GHz. For both frequencies, the maps on the left show the field calculated in the z=0𝑧0z=0italic_z = 0 plane; conversely the smaller map on the right shows the field in the x=0𝑥0x=0italic_x = 0 plane. Cyan dashed rectangles delimit the area of the sapphire substrate. The color scale is the same in all plots. (d) Evolution of the transmission spectrum for different values of the film conductivity σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ.

Electromagnetic simulations.

Finite-element electromagnetic simulations (CST-Microwave Studio) were carried out for the bare resonator in a wide frequency range between 5 and 12 GHz (Fig. S4). The resonator was modelled with realistic geometry and materials as discussed in Ref. Ghirri et al. (2023). The superconductor was initially considered as a perfect electric conductor having infinite dc conductivity (σ0=subscript𝜎0\sigma_{0}=\inftyitalic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∞). The transmission (S21subscript𝑆21S_{21}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) spectrum obtained from the simulation is shown in panel (a). The fundamental mode of the CPW resonator is found at 10.039 GHz, in good agreement with the experimental data (Fig. 1 of the Letter). The distribution of the oscillating magnetic field (𝐡𝐚𝐜subscript𝐡𝐚𝐜\mathbf{h_{ac}}bold_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_ac end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) shows an antinode in the middle of the CPW resonator with the field concentrated around the central conductor (Fig. S4(b)), as expected. At 10.516 GHz an additional mode appears with lower amplitude respect to the fundamental one (panel (a)). The distribution of 𝐡𝐚𝐜subscript𝐡𝐚𝐜\mathbf{h_{ac}}bold_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_ac end_POSTSUBSCRIPT calculated for this mode (panel (c)) shows that the magnetic field is nonuniformly spread across the whole chip, in particular into the sapphire substrate, while the amplitude of 𝐡𝐚𝐜subscript𝐡𝐚𝐜\mathbf{h_{ac}}bold_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_ac end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is minimum in the middle of the chip. We thus hereafter refer to the latter mode as the “dielectric” mode.

Simulations carried out by considering a layer of finite conductivity (σ1,2subscript𝜎12\sigma_{1,2}\neq\inftyitalic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≠ ∞) in place of the perfect electric conductor, show that the amplitude and frequency of the fundamental mode drop as the conductivity of the film decreases (Fig. S4(d)). The same variation of σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ determines less pronounced changes of both amplitude and frequency of the dielectric mode. These trends are in line with those evidenced by transmission spectra taken at different temperatures across the Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of YBCO (Fig. 3 of the Letter and Fig. S2).

Model.

The model by Cao et al. in Ref. Cao et al. (2015) describes the coupling between a microwave cavity having frequency ωcsubscript𝜔𝑐\omega_{c}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the spin wave resonance (SWR) modes in a magnetic film of thickness d𝑑ditalic_d. The transmission coefficient follows

S21=κci(ωωc)κcijg2ωωSWR(j)+iκS,subscript𝑆21subscript𝜅𝑐𝑖𝜔subscript𝜔𝑐subscript𝜅𝑐𝑖subscript𝑗superscript𝑔2𝜔superscriptsubscript𝜔𝑆𝑊𝑅𝑗𝑖subscript𝜅𝑆S_{21}=\frac{\kappa_{c}}{i(\omega-\omega_{c})-\kappa_{c}-i\sum_{j}\frac{g^{2}}% {\omega-\omega_{SWR}^{(j)}+i\kappa_{S}}},italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_i ( italic_ω - italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) - italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_i ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω - italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_W italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_i italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG , (15)

where κcsubscript𝜅𝑐\kappa_{c}italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and κssubscript𝜅𝑠\kappa_{s}italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are respectively the cavity and spin damping rates and g𝑔gitalic_g is the collective coupling strength between the cavity mode and the j𝑗jitalic_j-th SWR mode.

T𝑇Titalic_T(K) ωcsubscript𝜔𝑐\omega_{c}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT(GHz) d~(μm)~𝑑𝜇m\tilde{d}(\mathrm{\mu m})over~ start_ARG italic_d end_ARG ( italic_μ roman_m ) nSWRsubscript𝑛𝑆𝑊𝑅n_{SWR}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_W italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT g𝑔gitalic_g(GHz)
87 10.030 1.40 12 0.04
85 10.190 1.40 16 0.18
77 10.289 1.35 20 0.18
50 10.350 1.35 22 0.18
Table 1: List of the parameters used to fit the spectral maps in Fig. S3.

As pointed out by Kittel, resonances with symmetrically pinned boundaries (even mode numbers) can efficiently absorb energy and are observed with a strong amplitude, whereas resonances with odd mode numbers have smaller amplitude and are observed only when the microwave field is inhomogeneous Kittel (1958). We fitted the experimental data in Fig. S3 by using Eq. 15. We considered only SWR modes having even j𝑗jitalic_j, whose frequency has been obtained using Eq. 14. We note that the energy separation between the SWR modes in Fig. S3 is larger than what obtained from the calculated PSSW modes (Fig. S1). A satisfactory fit of the experimental spectra can be obtained by considering an effective thickness d~<d~𝑑𝑑\tilde{d}<dover~ start_ARG italic_d end_ARG < italic_d to account for the frequency separation between the modes. The fitted values of d~~𝑑\tilde{d}over~ start_ARG italic_d end_ARG are in the 1.351.40μm1.351.40𝜇m1.35-1.40~{}\mathrm{\mu m}1.35 - 1.40 italic_μ roman_m range across the whole temperature range, however such changes may be caused also by variations of the the exchange constant as a function of the temperature. The maximum number of SWR modes (nSWRsubscript𝑛𝑆𝑊𝑅n_{SWR}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_W italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) has been used as free parameter in order to match the number of lines observed in the experimental maps while we consider g𝑔gitalic_g constant for each j𝑗jitalic_j. The obtained parameters are summarized in Table 1; the calculated curves show a good correspondence with the experimental data (Fig. S3). In particular, the tails of these anticrossing are visible in a wide frequency range down to about 7 GHz; this behavior justifies the presence of additional resonances in the spectral maps shown in Fig. 4 of the Letter.

Refer to caption
Figure S5: Characterization of the bare supplemental resonator. (a) Image captured with the optical microscope showing the central region of the CPW resonator. The patterned YBCO film is light grey while the sapphire substrate is dark grey. (b) Temperature dependence of the fundamental frequency of the bare resonator (circles); the black line is calculated with Eq. 4. The penetration depth derived at the frequency of the resonator is displayed in red. The horizontal dashed line indicates the thickness of the YBCO film (t=330𝑡330t=330italic_t = 330 nm). Inset. Transmission spectrum taken at 10 K (circles); the red line shows the curve calculated with Eq. 2 and the fitting parameters ωc/2π=9.523subscript𝜔𝑐2𝜋9.523\omega_{c}/2\pi=9.523italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 2 italic_π = 9.523 GHz, QL=1146.5subscript𝑄𝐿1146.5Q_{L}=1146.5italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1146.5 and IL=7.11𝐼𝐿7.11IL=7.11italic_I italic_L = 7.11 dB.

To summarize, in this section we have analyzed the coupling between the dielectric mode and SWR resonances in the YIG film. We point out that there are several factors that might affect the SWR spectrum Zyuzin and Bazhanov (1996), such as the inhomogenous microwave field, that might justify the effective value of the film thickness used to fit the frequency separation between the resonances (Fig. S3). The spectra also show that the number of these lines is correlated to splitting of the main anticrossing, suggesting that these modes are probably excited as a consequence of the hybridization between CPW resonator and YIG film. However, we note in Fig. S3 that the upper polariton crosses the dielectric mode at 10.5absent10.5\approx 10.5≈ 10.5 GHz without any noticeable repulsion between the lines. This behavior suggests that the simultaneous hybridization among YIG film, CPW resonator and dielectric mode is vanishingly small in our experiment.

From the comparison between datasets in Fig. S3, Fig. S2 and reported in Ref. Ghirri et al. (2023), we note that the features of the additional anticrossings depend by the specific experimental conditions. In particular, in the latter two cases the additional lines are evident for frequencies around 10.5absent10.5\approx 10.5≈ 10.5 GHz but they become barely visible at the frequency of the CPW resonator. This observation gives further justification to the analysis reported above, in which the additional anticrossings are attributed to the coupling between dielectric mode and YIG film.

.8 Experiments with the supplemental resonator

Refer to caption
Figure S6: Transmission spectra acquired with the the YIG/GGG film loaded onto the supplemental resonator. The grey scale shows the numerical derivative of the transmission with respect to the magnetic field, S21/H0subscript𝑆21subscript𝐻0\partial S_{21}/\partial H_{0}∂ italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ∂ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The dashed lines show ωFMR(H0)subscript𝜔𝐹𝑀𝑅subscript𝐻0\omega_{FMR}(H_{0})italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F italic_M italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (green), ω0(H0)subscript𝜔0subscript𝐻0\omega_{0}(H_{0})italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (blue), ωb(H0)subscript𝜔𝑏subscript𝐻0\omega_{b}(H_{0})italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (yellow) and the calculated polaritonic modes Ω±(H0)subscriptΩplus-or-minussubscript𝐻0\Omega_{\pm}(H_{0})roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (red). White dash-dot lines show the frequency of the resonator at each temperature, while white dotted lines indicate the frequency of the dielectric mode.

To better assess the robustness of the results reported in the Letter, we fabricated an additional YBCO/sapphire CPW resonator having different geometric parameters. We tested its behavior by transmission spectroscopy measurements at different temperatures, firstly for the bare resonator and subsequently with the same YIG/GGG film as used with the main resonator.

Characterization of the bare resonator.

The fabrication procedure described in Sect. .1 and Ref. Ghirri et al. (2023) was applied to produce a YBCO/sapphire CPW resonator having a central conductor with mean width w=8.0μm𝑤8.0𝜇mw=8.0~{}\mathrm{\mu m}italic_w = 8.0 italic_μ roman_m and separation s=8.5μm𝑠8.5𝜇ms=8.5~{}\mathrm{\mu m}italic_s = 8.5 italic_μ roman_m between the central conductor and the lateral ground planes (Fig. S5(a)). The estimated characteristic impedance is Z0=62Ωsubscript𝑍062ΩZ_{0}=62~{}\mathrm{\Omega}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 62 roman_Ω. The length of the central conductor of the resonator is 6.2 mm and the capacitive coupling gaps are 50μm50𝜇m50~{}\mathrm{\mu m}50 italic_μ roman_m wide.

The transmission spectrum acquired at 10 K shows a peak at 9.52 GHz that corresponds to the fundamental mode of the CPW resonator (Inset in Fig. S5(b)). The evolution of the peak frequency was tracked as a function of temperature and fit with Eq. 4 (Fig. S5(b)). The parameters that characterize the temperature dependence of the penetration depth (Eq. 2 of the Letter) are λL(0)=125nmsubscript𝜆𝐿0125nm\lambda_{L}(0)=125~{}\mathrm{nm}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ) = 125 roman_nm, Tc=87.6Ksubscript𝑇𝑐87.6KT_{c}=87.6~{}\mathrm{K}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 87.6 roman_K and p=4/3𝑝43p=4/3italic_p = 4 / 3, in close agreement with those reported for the main resonator.

Hybrid magnon-photon system.

The YIG/GGG film was positioned onto the resonator as described in Sect. .1. The experimental spectra in Fig. S6 were acquired at different temperatures to monitor the evolution of the spectral maps. Overall, the temperature dependence of the normal mode spectrum is consistent with what obtained with the main resonator. In particular these data confirms, as temperature decreases, the progressive increase of the resonator frequency, the widening of the anticrossing gap and the shift of the upper polariton towards lower magnetic fields.

By using of the model described in the Letter, we calculated the dispersion of the polaritonic modes at each temperature. In order to reproduce the experimental spectra, we extracted from each map the frequency of the resonator (ωcsubscript𝜔𝑐\omega_{c}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT), while the frequency shift (δscsubscript𝛿𝑠𝑐\delta_{sc}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) and coupling strength (g𝑔gitalic_g) were calculated directly from Eqs. 6 and 7 of the Letter by including the temperature independent wavenumber, ky=4×105radm1subscript𝑘𝑦4superscript105radsuperscriptm1k_{y}=4\times 10^{5}~{}\mathrm{rad~{}m^{-1}}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_rad roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, r=0.047𝑟0.047r=0.047italic_r = 0.047 and number of spins, Ns=1.8×1014subscript𝑁𝑠1.8superscript1014N_{s}=1.8\times 10^{14}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.8 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 14 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, as fitting parameters. The latter resulted about one fifth of the values reported for the main resonator.

Refer to caption
Figure S7: Temperature dependence of the parameters used to reproduce the evolution of the spectra measured with the supplemental resonator (circles). Solid lines are calculated as discussed in the text.

Fig. S6 shows that at each temperature the calculated polaritonic modes compare well with the experimental spectra. The temperature evolution of the obtained ωcsubscript𝜔𝑐\omega_{c}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, δscsubscript𝛿𝑠𝑐\delta_{sc}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and g𝑔gitalic_g parameters is reported in Fig. S7. In the presence of the YIG/GGG sample, the fit of the temperature dependence of ωcsubscript𝜔𝑐\omega_{c}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (Eq. 4) provides a slightly reduced critical temperature (Tc=86.9Ksubscript𝑇𝑐86.9KT_{c}=86.9~{}\mathrm{K}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 86.9 roman_K), in agreement to what observed with the main resonator. The maximum collective coupling strength, g0/2π1.6GHzsubscript𝑔02𝜋1.6GHzg_{0}/2\pi\approx 1.6~{}\mathrm{GHz}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 2 italic_π ≈ 1.6 roman_GHz, is slightly lower than those obtained with the main resonator. This value is determined by the lower volume of the supplemental resonator which, in spite of the larger spin-photon coupling (Eq. 7 of the Letter), gives rise to a lower Nssubscript𝑁𝑠N_{s}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The maximum frequency shift δsc/2π0.6GHzsubscript𝛿𝑠𝑐2𝜋0.6GHz\delta_{sc}/2\pi\approx 0.6~{}\mathrm{GHz}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 2 italic_π ≈ 0.6 roman_GHz resulted lower than what achieved with the main resonator, while its temperature dependence is consistent with the evolution of the polariton modes and the fitted kysubscript𝑘𝑦k_{y}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

In summary, the results obtained with the supplemental resonator support the validity of the analysis and of the main conclusions reported in the Letter.