Search for 10–1000 GeV neutrinos from Gamma Ray Bursts with IceCube

R. Abbasi Department of Physics, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USA M. Ackermann Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany J. Adams Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand S. K. Agarwalla also at Institute of Physics, Sachivalaya Marg, Sainik School Post, Bhubaneswar 751005, India Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA J. A. Aguilar Université Libre de Bruxelles, Science Faculty CP230, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium M. Ahlers Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark J.M. Alameddine Dept. of Physics, TU Dortmund University, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany N. M. Amin Bartol Research Institute and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA K. Andeen Department of Physics, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA G. Anton Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany C. Argüelles Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Y. Ashida Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA S. Athanasiadou Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany L. Ausborm III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany S. N. Axani Bartol Research Institute and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA X. Bai Physics Department, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701, USA A. Balagopal V. Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA M. Baricevic Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA S. W. Barwick Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA V. Basu Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA R. Bay Dept. of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA J. J. Beatty Dept. of Astronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Dept. of Physics and Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA J. Becker Tjus also at Department of Space, Earth tand Environment, eChalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden Fakultät für Physik & Astronomie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany J. Beise Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden C. Bellenghi Physik-department, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany C. Benning III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany S. BenZvi Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA D. Berley Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA E. Bernardini Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia Galileo Galilei, Università Degli Studi di Padova, I-35122 Padova PD, Italy D. Z. Besson Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA E. Blaufuss Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA S. Blot Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany F. Bontempo Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany J. Y. Book Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA C. Boscolo Meneguolo Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia Galileo Galilei, Università Degli Studi di Padova, I-35122 Padova PD, Italy S. Böser Institute of Physics, University of Mainz, Staudinger Weg 7, D-55099 Mainz, Germany O. Botner Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden J. Böttcher III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany J. Braun Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA B. Brinson School of Physics and Center for Relativistic Astrophysics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA J. Brostean-Kaiser Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany L. Brusa III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany R. T. Burley Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia R. S. Busse Institut für Kernphysik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany D. Butterfield Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA M. A. Campana Dept. of Physics, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA K. Carloni Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA E. G. Carnie-Bronca Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia S. Chattopadhyay also at Institute of Physics, Sachivalaya Marg, Sainik School Post, Bhubaneswar 751005, India Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA N. Chau Université Libre de Bruxelles, Science Faculty CP230, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium C. Chen School of Physics and Center for Relativistic Astrophysics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA Z. Chen Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800, USA D. Chirkin Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA S. Choi Dept. of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea B. A. Clark Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA A. Coleman Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden G. H. Collin Dept. of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA A. Connolly Dept. of Astronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Dept. of Physics and Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA J. M. Conrad Dept. of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA P. Coppin Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Dienst ELEM, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium P. Correa Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Dienst ELEM, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium D. F. Cowen Dept. of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA Dept. of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA P. Dave School of Physics and Center for Relativistic Astrophysics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA C. De Clercq Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Dienst ELEM, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium J. J. DeLaunay Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA D. Delgado Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA S. Deng III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany K. Deoskar Oskar Klein Centre and Dept. of Physics, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden A. Desai Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA P. Desiati Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA K. D. de Vries Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Dienst ELEM, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium G. de Wasseige Centre for Cosmology, Particle Physics and Phenomenology - CP3, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium T. DeYoung Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA A. Diaz Dept. of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA J. C. Díaz-Vélez Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA M. Dittmer Institut für Kernphysik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany A. Domi Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany H. Dujmovic Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA M. A. DuVernois Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA T. Ehrhardt Institute of Physics, University of Mainz, Staudinger Weg 7, D-55099 Mainz, Germany A. Eimer Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany P. Eller Physik-department, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany E. Ellinger Dept. of Physics, University of Wuppertal, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany S. El Mentawi III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany D. Elsässer Dept. of Physics, TU Dortmund University, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany R. Engel Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Experimental Particle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany H. Erpenbeck Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA J. Evans Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA P. A. Evenson Bartol Research Institute and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA K. L. Fan Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA K. Fang Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA K. Farrag Dept. of Physics and The International Center for Hadron Astrophysics, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan A. R. Fazely Dept. of Physics, Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813, USA A. Fedynitch Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan N. Feigl Institut für Physik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, D-12489 Berlin, Germany S. Fiedlschuster Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany C. Finley Oskar Klein Centre and Dept. of Physics, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden L. Fischer Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany D. Fox Dept. of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA A. Franckowiak Fakultät für Physik & Astronomie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany P. Fürst III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany J. Gallagher Dept. of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA E. Ganster III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany A. Garcia Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA L. Gerhardt Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA A. Ghadimi Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA C. Glaser Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden T. Glauch Physik-department, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany T. Glüsenkamp Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden J. G. Gonzalez Bartol Research Institute and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA D. Grant Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA S. J. Gray Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA O. Gries III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany S. Griffin Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA S. Griswold Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA K. M. Groth Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark C. Günther III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany P. Gutjahr Dept. of Physics, TU Dortmund University, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany C. Ha Dept. of Physics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea C. Haack Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany A. Hallgren Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden R. Halliday Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA L. Halve III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany F. Halzen Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA H. Hamdaoui Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800, USA M. Ha Minh Physik-department, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany M. Handt III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany K. Hanson Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA J. Hardin Dept. of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA A. A. Harnisch Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA P. Hatch Dept. of Physics, Engineering Physics, and Astronomy, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada A. Haungs Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany J. Häußler III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany K. Helbing Dept. of Physics, University of Wuppertal, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany J. Hellrung Fakultät für Physik & Astronomie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany J. Hermannsgabner III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany L. Heuermann III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany N. Heyer Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden S. Hickford Dept. of Physics, University of Wuppertal, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany A. Hidvegi Oskar Klein Centre and Dept. of Physics, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden C. Hill Dept. of Physics and The International Center for Hadron Astrophysics, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan G. C. Hill Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia K. D. Hoffman Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA S. Hori Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA K. Hoshina also at Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA W. Hou Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany T. Huber Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany K. Hultqvist Oskar Klein Centre and Dept. of Physics, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden M. Hünnefeld Dept. of Physics, TU Dortmund University, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany R. Hussain Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA K. Hymon Dept. of Physics, TU Dortmund University, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany S. In Dept. of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea A. Ishihara Dept. of Physics and The International Center for Hadron Astrophysics, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan M. Jacquart Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA O. Janik III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany M. Jansson Oskar Klein Centre and Dept. of Physics, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden G. S. Japaridze CTSPS, Clark-Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA 30314, USA M. Jeong Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA M. Jin Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA B. J. P. Jones Dept. of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, 502 Yates St., Science Hall Rm 108, Box 19059, Arlington, TX 76019, USA N. Kamp Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA D. Kang Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany W. Kang Dept. of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea X. Kang Dept. of Physics, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA A. Kappes Institut für Kernphysik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany D. Kappesser Institute of Physics, University of Mainz, Staudinger Weg 7, D-55099 Mainz, Germany L. Kardum Dept. of Physics, TU Dortmund University, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany T. Karg Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany M. Karl Physik-department, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany A. Karle Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA A. Katil Dept. of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E1, Canada U. Katz Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany M. Kauer Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA J. L. Kelley Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA A. Khatee Zathul Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA A. Kheirandish Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA Nevada Center for Astrophysics, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA J. Kiryluk Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800, USA S. R. Klein Dept. of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA A. Kochocki Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA R. Koirala Bartol Research Institute and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA H. Kolanoski Institut für Physik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, D-12489 Berlin, Germany T. Kontrimas Physik-department, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany L. Köpke Institute of Physics, University of Mainz, Staudinger Weg 7, D-55099 Mainz, Germany C. Kopper Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany D. J. Koskinen Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark P. Koundal Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany M. Kovacevich Dept. of Physics, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA M. Kowalski Institut für Physik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, D-12489 Berlin, Germany Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany T. Kozynets Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark J. Krishnamoorthi also at Institute of Physics, Sachivalaya Marg, Sainik School Post, Bhubaneswar 751005, India Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA K. Kruiswijk Centre for Cosmology, Particle Physics and Phenomenology - CP3, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium E. Krupczak Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA A. Kumar Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany E. Kun Fakultät für Physik & Astronomie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany N. Kurahashi Dept. of Physics, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA N. Lad Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany C. Lagunas Gualda Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany M. Lamoureux Centre for Cosmology, Particle Physics and Phenomenology - CP3, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium M. J. Larson Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA S. Latseva III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany F. Lauber Dept. of Physics, University of Wuppertal, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany J. P. Lazar Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA J. W. Lee Dept. of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea K. Leonard DeHolton Dept. of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA A. Leszczyńska Bartol Research Institute and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA M. Lincetto Fakultät für Physik & Astronomie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany Y. Liu Dept. of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA Dept. of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA M. Liubarska Dept. of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E1, Canada E. Lohfink Institute of Physics, University of Mainz, Staudinger Weg 7, D-55099 Mainz, Germany C. Love Dept. of Physics, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA C. J. Lozano Mariscal Institut für Kernphysik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany L. Lu Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA F. Lucarelli Département de physique nucléaire et corpusculaire, Université de Genève, CH-1211 Genève, Switzerland W. Luszczak Dept. of Astronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Dept. of Physics and Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Y. Lyu Dept. of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA J. Madsen Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA E. Magnus Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Dienst ELEM, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium K. B. M. Mahn Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA Y. Makino Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA E. Manao Physik-department, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany S. Mancina Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia Galileo Galilei, Università Degli Studi di Padova, I-35122 Padova PD, Italy W. Marie Sainte Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA I. C. Mariş Université Libre de Bruxelles, Science Faculty CP230, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium S. Marka Columbia Astrophysics and Nevis Laboratories, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA Z. Marka Columbia Astrophysics and Nevis Laboratories, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA M. Marsee Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA I. Martinez-Soler Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA R. Maruyama Dept. of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA F. Mayhew Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA T. McElroy Dept. of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E1, Canada F. McNally Department of Physics, Mercer University, Macon, GA 31207-0001, USA J. V. Mead Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark K. Meagher Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA S. Mechbal Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany A. Medina Dept. of Physics and Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA M. Meier Dept. of Physics and The International Center for Hadron Astrophysics, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan Y. Merckx Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Dienst ELEM, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium L. Merten Fakultät für Physik & Astronomie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany J. Micallef Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA J. Mitchell Dept. of Physics, Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813, USA T. Montaruli Département de physique nucléaire et corpusculaire, Université de Genève, CH-1211 Genève, Switzerland R. W. Moore Dept. of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E1, Canada Y. Morii Dept. of Physics and The International Center for Hadron Astrophysics, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan R. Morse Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA M. Moulai Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA T. Mukherjee Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany R. Naab Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany R. Nagai Dept. of Physics and The International Center for Hadron Astrophysics, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan M. Nakos Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA U. Naumann Dept. of Physics, University of Wuppertal, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany J. Necker Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany A. Negi Dept. of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, 502 Yates St., Science Hall Rm 108, Box 19059, Arlington, TX 76019, USA M. Neumann Institut für Kernphysik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany H. Niederhausen Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA M. U. Nisa Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA A. Noell III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany A. Novikov Bartol Research Institute and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA S. C. Nowicki Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA A. Obertacke Pollmann Dept. of Physics and The International Center for Hadron Astrophysics, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan V. O’Dell Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA B. Oeyen Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Gent, B-9000 Gent, Belgium A. Olivas Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA R. Orsoe Physik-department, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany J. Osborn Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA E. O’Sullivan Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden H. Pandya Bartol Research Institute and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA N. Park Dept. of Physics, Engineering Physics, and Astronomy, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada G. K. Parker Dept. of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, 502 Yates St., Science Hall Rm 108, Box 19059, Arlington, TX 76019, USA E. N. Paudel Bartol Research Institute and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA L. Paul Physics Department, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701, USA C. Pérez de los Heros Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden J. Peterson Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA S. Philippen III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany A. Pizzuto Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA M. Plum Physics Department, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701, USA A. Pontén Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden Y. Popovych Institute of Physics, University of Mainz, Staudinger Weg 7, D-55099 Mainz, Germany M. Prado Rodriguez Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA B. Pries Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA R. Procter-Murphy Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA G. T. Przybylski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA C. Raab Centre for Cosmology, Particle Physics and Phenomenology - CP3, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium J. Rack-Helleis Institute of Physics, University of Mainz, Staudinger Weg 7, D-55099 Mainz, Germany K. Rawlins Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Dr., Anchorage, AK 99508, USA Z. Rechav Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA A. Rehman Bartol Research Institute and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA P. Reichherzer Fakultät für Physik & Astronomie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany E. Resconi Physik-department, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany S. Reusch Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany W. Rhode Dept. of Physics, TU Dortmund University, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany B. Riedel Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA A. Rifaie III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany E. J. Roberts Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia S. Robertson Dept. of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA S. Rodan Dept. of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea G. Roellinghoff Dept. of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea M. Rongen Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany A. Rosted Dept. of Physics and The International Center for Hadron Astrophysics, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan C. Rott Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA Dept. of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea T. Ruhe Dept. of Physics, TU Dortmund University, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany L. Ruohan Physik-department, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany D. Ryckbosch Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Gent, B-9000 Gent, Belgium I. Safa Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA J. Saffer Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Experimental Particle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany D. Salazar-Gallegos Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA P. Sampathkumar Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany S. E. Sanchez Herrera Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA A. Sandrock Dept. of Physics, University of Wuppertal, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany M. Santander Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA S. Sarkar Dept. of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E1, Canada S. Sarkar Dept. of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom J. Savelberg III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany P. Savina Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA M. Schaufel III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany H. Schieler Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany S. Schindler Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany L. Schlickmann III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany B. Schlüter Institut für Kernphysik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany F. Schlüter Université Libre de Bruxelles, Science Faculty CP230, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium N. Schmeisser Dept. of Physics, University of Wuppertal, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany T. Schmidt Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA J. Schneider Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany F. G. Schröder Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany Bartol Research Institute and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA L. Schumacher Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany S. Sclafani Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA D. Seckel Bartol Research Institute and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA M. Seikh Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA S. Seunarine Dept. of Physics, University of Wisconsin, River Falls, WI 54022, USA R. Shah Dept. of Physics, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA S. Shefali Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Experimental Particle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany N. Shimizu Dept. of Physics and The International Center for Hadron Astrophysics, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan C. Silva School of Physics and Center for Relativistic Astrophysics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA M. Silva Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA B. Skrzypek Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA B. Smithers Dept. of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, 502 Yates St., Science Hall Rm 108, Box 19059, Arlington, TX 76019, USA R. Snihur Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA J. Soedingrekso Dept. of Physics, TU Dortmund University, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany A. Søgaard Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark D. Soldin Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Experimental Particle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany P. Soldin III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany G. Sommani Fakultät für Physik & Astronomie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany C. Spannfellner Physik-department, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany G. M. Spiczak Dept. of Physics, University of Wisconsin, River Falls, WI 54022, USA C. Spiering Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany M. Stamatikos Dept. of Physics and Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA T. Stanev Bartol Research Institute and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA T. Stezelberger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA T. Stürwald Dept. of Physics, University of Wuppertal, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany T. Stuttard Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark G. W. Sullivan Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA I. Taboada School of Physics and Center for Relativistic Astrophysics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA S. Ter-Antonyan Dept. of Physics, Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813, USA M. Thiesmeyer III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany W. G. Thompson Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA J. Thwaites Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA S. Tilav Bartol Research Institute and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA K. Tollefson Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA C. Tönnis Dept. of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea S. Toscano Université Libre de Bruxelles, Science Faculty CP230, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium D. Tosi Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA A. Trettin Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany C. F. Tung School of Physics and Center for Relativistic Astrophysics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA R. Turcotte Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany J. P. Twagirayezu Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA M. A. Unland Elorrieta Institut für Kernphysik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany A. K. Upadhyay also at Institute of Physics, Sachivalaya Marg, Sainik School Post, Bhubaneswar 751005, India Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA K. Upshaw Dept. of Physics, Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813, USA A. Vaidyanathan Department of Physics, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA N. Valtonen-Mattila Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden J. Vandenbroucke Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA N. van Eijndhoven Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Dienst ELEM, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium D. Vannerom Dept. of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA J. van Santen Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany J. Vara Institut für Kernphysik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany J. Veitch-Michaelis Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA M. Venugopal Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany M. Vereecken Centre for Cosmology, Particle Physics and Phenomenology - CP3, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium S. Verpoest Bartol Research Institute and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA D. Veske Columbia Astrophysics and Nevis Laboratories, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA A. Vijai Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA C. Walck Oskar Klein Centre and Dept. of Physics, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden Y. Wang Dept. of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA Dept. of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA C. Weaver Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA P. Weigel Dept. of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA A. Weindl Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany J. Weldert Dept. of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA A. Y. Wen Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA C. Wendt Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA J. Werthebach Dept. of Physics, TU Dortmund University, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany M. Weyrauch Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany N. Whitehorn Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA C. H. Wiebusch III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany D. R. Williams Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA L. Witthaus Dept. of Physics, TU Dortmund University, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany A. Wolf III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany M. Wolf Physik-department, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany G. Wrede Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany X. W. Xu Dept. of Physics, Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813, USA J. P. Yanez Dept. of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E1, Canada E. Yildizci Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA S. Yoshida Dept. of Physics and The International Center for Hadron Astrophysics, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan R. Young Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA S. Yu Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA T. Yuan Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA Z. Zhang Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800, USA P. Zhelnin Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA P. Zilberman Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA M. Zimmerman Dept. of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA

Abstract

We present the results of a search for 10–1000 GeV neutrinos from 2268 gamma-ray bursts over 8 years of IceCube-DeepCore data. This work probes burst physics below the photosphere where electromagnetic radiation cannot escape. Neutrinos of tens of GeVs are predicted in sub-photospheric collision of free streaming neutrons with bulk-jet protons. In a first analysis, we searched for the most significant neutrino-GRB coincidence using six overlapping time windows centered on the prompt phase of each GRB. In a second analysis, we conducted a search for a group of GRBs, each individually too weak to be detectable, but potentially significant when combined. No evidence of neutrino emission is found for either analysis. The most significant neutrino coincidence is for Fermi-GBM GRB bn 140807500, with a $p$ -value of 0.097 corrected for all trials. The binomial test used to search for a group of GRBs had a $p$ -value of 0.65 after all trial corrections. The binomial test found a group consisting only of GRB bn 140807500 and no additional GRBs. The neutrino limits of this work complement those obtained by IceCube at TeV to PeV energies. We compare our findings for the large set of GRBs as well as GRB 221009A to the sub-photospheric neutron-proton collision model and find that GRB 221009A provides the most constraining limit on baryon loading. For a jet Lorentz factor of 300 (800), the baryon loading on GRB 221009A is lower than 3.85 (2.13) at a 90% confidence level.

Neutrinos, gamma-ray burst: general, gamma-ray burst: individual (GRB 221009A)

1 Introduction

Gamma Ray Bursts, or GRBs, (Piran, 2004) are among the most powerful objects in the Universe. During the milliseconds to hundreds of seconds “prompt phase”, copious amounts of keV–MeV photons are released. The fireball scenario (Piran, 1999) assumes a radiation-dominated electron-positron plasma ejected in a jet at a high Lorentz factor, $\Gamma\gtrsim 300$ . The prompt phase is followed by a decaying multi-wavelength afterglow that can be observed from radio to X-rays for days to years (Kangas & Fruchter, 2021). GRBs are empirically classified as either long for a duration of the prompt phase $T_{90}$ , larger than 2 seconds, or as short otherwise. Long GRBs are associated with supernovae, see e.g. Hjorth (2013) and Cano et al. (2017) for reviews. Short GRBs are associated with the merger of compact objects as corroborated with the observation of gravitational waves for GRB/GW 170817A (Abbott et al., 2017).

GRBs have been proposed as cosmic ray accelerators (Vietri, 1995; Waxman, 1995). The interaction of these cosmic rays with local environment radiation and/or matter would result in PeV neutrinos during the prompt phase (Waxman & Bahcall, 1997; Zhang & Kumar, 2013), TeV precursor neutrinos prior to the prompt phase (Mészáros & Waxman, 2001; Razzaque et al., 2003; Murase & Ioka, 2013) and EeV neutrinos during the afterglow (Waxman & Bahcall, 2000). IceCube has discovered an all-sky, all-flavor, flux of neutrinos from $\sim$ 10 TeV to $\sim$ 10 PeV (Aartsen et al., 2020a; Abbasi et al., 2021, 2022a). GRBs are a long-standing candidate to explain, at least in part, this flux.

Neutrons and protons entrained on a GRB fireball can lead to GeV-scale neutrinos (Bahcall & Mészáros, 2000). Sub-photospheric neutron-proton decoupling in the fireball leads to 1–10 GeV neutrinos. These neutrinos are too low energy for the study reported here. Decoupled neutrons collide below the photosphere with fireball-entrained protons (Murase et al., 2013). These collisions produce charged and neutral pions. Charged pions decay, directly and indirectly, into neutrinos and charged leptons. In the collision scenario, typical neutrino energy is tens of GeV, an energy range that is tested in this work. For both decoupling and collision scenarios, neutrinos have a quasi-thermal spectrum and precede the prompt phase by tens of seconds.

To date, there is no evidence of neutrino emission from GRBs. IceCube has conducted searches for TeV to PeV neutrinos in coincidence with GRBs during the prompt phase (Abbasi et al., 2012a; Aartsen et al., 2015, 2016, 2017a). Recently, IceCube has searched for neutrino-GRB coincidences in the TeV to PeV energy range during the prompt, precursor, and afterglow phases (Abbasi et al., 2022b). During the prompt phase, IceCube results demonstrated that GRBs cannot be responsible for more than $\sim$ 1% of IceCube’s extragalactic neutrino flux. For time windows around GRBs of $10^{4}$ s, centered on the prompt phase, GRBs cannot contribute to more than 24% of the extragalactic neutrino flux. ANTARES, which operated in the TeV to PeV energy range, conducted searches for neutrinos in coincidence with GRBs without finding a coincidence (Albert et al., 2017, 2021a, 2021b). Super-Kamiokande has conducted a search for neutrinos from GRBs above 8 MeV also with null results (Orii et al., 2021).

The brightest GRB of all time, GRB 221009A (Burns et al., 2023), was detected while this publication was being prepared and is not included in the list of 2268 GRBs we analyze here. Murase et al. (2022) have calculated neutrino fluxes for GRB 221009A in the sub-photospheric neutron-proton collision model. GRB 221009A was studied in neutrinos from MeV to PeV by IceCube (Abbasi et al., 2023a, b) and no evidence for neutrino emission was found. The search for 10–1000 GeV neutrinos from GRB 221009A by IceCube is methodologically identical to the work presented here, differing only on the duration of time windows used. GRB 221009A was also studied by KM3NeT and no evidence for neutrino emission was found either (KM3NeT Collaboration, 2022).

In this work, we present a study of 2268 GRBs detected by satellite-borne instruments with eight years of IceCube-DeepCore data in the 10 GeV to 1000 GeV energy range. The present study covers the precursor, prompt, and early afterglow phases of GRBs for a total duration of up to 500 s centered on the prompt phase. We find no evidence for 10–1000 GeV neutrino emission by GRBs. We use two analysis methods, one to search for the most significant GRB-neutrino coincidence and another to search for an ensemble of GRBs that may be too weak to be detectable individually with neutrinos but may be significant as a group. We find no evidence of neutrino emission for these 2268 GRBs in either analysis and we set limits on the time-integrated, all neutrino flavor, neutrino flux. The results presented here are compared to limits for $\gtrsim$ TeV that IceCube has published. Because GRB 221009A has an extremely high energy fluence, we compare predicted signal expectations for the sub-photospheric neutron-proton collision model for 2264 GRBs, for which energy fluence has been reported, to GRB 221009A. We find that, under the model assumptions, the signal expectation for GRB 221009A is a factor 6–8 higher than for the other 2264 GRBs combined. Also, the total background for GRB 221009A is significantly lower. Thus, we derive the best possible limit on jet baryon loading using neutrino limits on GRB 221009A by IceCube (Abbasi et al., 2023b). Assuming a jet Lorentz factor of 300 (800), the baryon loading on GRB 221009A is lower than 3.85 (2.13) at a 90% confidence level.

2 IceCube, DeepCore, and Dataset description

The IceCube Neutrino Observatory (Aartsen et al., 2017b) consists of an array of 5,160 digital optical modules (DOMs) on a total of 86 strings embedded within one cubic kilometer of Antarctic ice at the South Pole. All DOMs include a downward-facing photomultiplier tube (PMT) (Aartsen et al., 2020b), and associated electronics (Abbasi et al., 2009) enclosed within a glass vessel and are deployed from 1.45 km to 2.45 km below the surface. IceCube is optimized for $\gtrsim$ TeV observations, matching an inter-string spacing of $\sim$ 125 m. Six DeepCore strings were installed on the vertices of a hexagon with a side of 42 m. At the hexagon center is the central standard IceCube string. Two additional DeepCore-infill strings have been placed inside the hexagon with even smaller horizontal separation. The combination of these 8 strings and 7 nearby standard IceCube strings form the DeepCore sub-detector (Abbasi et al., 2012b). The physics region of DeepCore is a cylinder of 125 m in radius and 350 m in height. DeepCore is optimized for $\gtrsim$ 10 GeV neutrino observations. For DeepCore and DeepCore-infill strings, 50 DOMs are installed with 7 m vertical spacing, between 2.1 km and 2.45 km of depth. The other 10 DOMs are installed with a 10 m vertical separation between 1.8 km and 1.9 km of depth. These DOMs are used for enhanced down-going cosmic ray muon rejection. The region between 2,000 m and 2,100 m is not instrumented in DeepCore and DeepCore-infill strings as glacial ice in this region has worse optical properties (Aartsen et al., 2013). All the DOMs in the DeepCore strings are equipped with high quantum efficiency PMTs. The DOMs on the DeepCore-infill strings have a mixture of standard and high quantum efficiency PMTs.

We use IceCube-DeepCore data collected between April 26, 2012, and May 29, 2020, with a total live time of 7.68 years, which corresponds to an uptime of 95%. The data sample used in this publication, called GRECO-Astronomy (GeV Reconstructed Events with Containment for Oscillations), is described in detail in Abbasi et al. (2022c). GRECO-Astronomy has sensitivity over the entire sky (4 $\pi$ sr) that is only weakly dependent on declination. As they produce virtually identical signatures, IceCube-DeepCore cannot distinguish $\nu$ from $\bar{\nu}$ . The GRECO-Astronomy dataset is sensitive to all neutrino flavors via cascades and starting tracks.

Refer to caption — Figure 1: (Left) Distribution of circularized 1-sigma localization uncertainties for GRBs used in this work. (Right) Distribution of prompt phase duration, $T_{prompt}$ , for GRBs in this study. See text for the definition of $T_{prompt}$ . Also shown, as arrows, are the durations of the six time windows used to search for neutrino-GRB coincidences. It can be seen that the widest time window, of duration 500 s, covers the $T_{prompt}$ of all GRBs but ten.

Cascades, or showers, are the product of neutral current interactions for all neutrino flavors, as well as charged current interactions of $\nu_{e}$ and the majority of $\nu_{\tau}$ . For cascades, all energy is deposited in a small volume that is contained in DeepCore. This leads to good energy resolution, but poor angular resolution (Abbasi et al., 2022c). Starting tracks are predominantly muons originating from $\nu_{\mu}$ charged-current interactions. In this case, part of the energy is deposited in a shower at the neutrino interaction vertex, plus an outgoing, relatively long-range muon. If sufficiently long, tracks can provide smaller angular uncertainty estimates than cascades. The GRECO-Astronomy dataset includes event reconstructions for both cascades and starting tracks. The median angular resolution ranges from $\sim$ 40 degrees for cascades with reconstructed visible energy of 10 GeV to a few degrees for starting tracks with $\gtrsim$ 100 GeV reconstructed energy. In this work, we keep only events with reconstructed energy above 10 GeV, which reduces the average GRECO-Astronomy event rate from 4.6 mHz (16.6 per hour) to 4.17 mHz (15 per hour). This choice is taken because the angular uncertainty of lower reconstructed energy events is judged too poor to be used here. There are 1,010,151 events in the final data sample used in this work.

We used GRBweb (Coppin, 2021) to select GRBs for this study. This catalog brings together information from a variety of public GRB databases, such as the General Coordinate Network (GCN) Notices and Circulars, and compiles electromagnetic observational data from a large number of instruments including Fermi-GBM (Meegan et al., 2009), Fermi-LAT (Atwood et al., 2009), Swift-BAT (Barthelmy et al., 2005), the IPN network (Hurley et al., 2013), etc. Within the time period studied, 2297 GRBs were recorded in GRBweb. Of these, we have selected 2268 GRBs for this work. We have excluded 29 GRBs that do not have a sky localization or localization uncertainty. For each GRB we obtain four pieces of information from GRBweb: the sky localization, the localization uncertainty, the duration, and the energy fluence. When multiple detectors observe a given burst, we use the localization information for the detector with the smallest localization uncertainty. In GRBweb, localization uncertainty is assumed to be the 1 $\sigma$ uncertainty for a 2D normal distribution, implying that the true position of the GRB lies in the uncertainty circle 39% of the time. Some instruments, e.g., Fermi-GBM provide more detailed information than the 1 $\sigma$ localization uncertainty. For these cases, GRBweb calculates the equivalent 1 $\sigma$ circularized uncertainty that provides the correct coverage. For GRBs localized by IPN, it is not possible to calculate 1 $\sigma$ circularized uncertainty since these GRBs are located in a box in the sky and only 3 $\sigma$ bounds are provided. For IPN, we use the larger of the two uncertainty box dimensions to generate a circularized uncertainty region. Each instrument that observes a GRB will typically provide a start time, $T_{0}$ , and duration of the prompt phase, $T_{90}$ . GRBweb determines the largest duration that covers all the $T_{90}$ observations. We call this duration $T_{prompt}$ . In the majority of bursts used in this work $T_{prompt}$ matches the $T_{90}$ of a single observing instrument, which is most frequently Fermi-GBM. The energy fluence $f_{\gamma}$ , during the prompt phase, is chosen by GRBweb to be that of the instrument with the widest energy observation band. Often this will be Fermi-GBM, as it has sensitivity from 10 keV to 10 MeV. The energy fluence is not used in the search for neutrino-GRB coincidences, but it is used in the interpretation of the results.

Each burst location and localization uncertainty is considered as a prior described by a probability density function. When the best localization of a given burst is by Fermi-GBM, we use HEALPix maps (Górski et al., 2005) produced by Fermi-GBM. Fermi-GBM maps starting in early 2018 were released publicly (Goldstein et al., 2020). Maps for bursts prior to 2018 were processed similarly using the same GBM Data Tools. However, the metadata in the files have not been fully qualified and the files have not been uploaded to HEASARC ¹¹1FTP data: https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/FTP/fermi/data/gbm/triggers/. Therefore, we use preliminary maps by Goldstein & Wood (2022). If a different instrument provides a better localization than Fermi-GBM, then synthetic HEALpix maps were created. These synthetic maps have uniform (top-hat) probability over the circularized 1 $\sigma$ localization uncertainty obtained via GRBweb. If the GRBweb localization uncertainty is smaller than 1 degree, then the synthetic map is created with a radius of 1 degree. As can be seen on the left panel of Figure 1, this lower bound of 1 degree is used in the vast majority of synthetic maps. The lower bound of 1 degree is used for computational reasons and does not significantly affect this analysis, as the typical GRECO-Astronomy event has an angular uncertainty much larger than 1 degree.

Of the 2268 GRBs studied in this work, 1,390 have Fermi-GBM HEALPix skymaps and 878 have synthetic skymaps. All HEALPix maps have been rebinned to a setting of Nside=64, corresponding to 49,152 pixels over the entire sky. Each pixel has an angular area of $\sim$ 0.84 square degrees, which is usually smaller than the angular resolution for the best-reconstructed events in the GRECO-Astronomy dataset.

3 Methods

We have conducted two analyses in this work. First, we search for the statistically most significant GRB in a temporal and directional coincidence with GRECO-Astronomy neutrino events. Second, we search for the most statistically significant group of GRBs in temporal and directional correlation with GRECO-Astronomy neutrinos. This latter search can potentially find a subset of the 2268 GRBs as neutrino emitters, even though none of the GRBs were statistically significant on their own. This second analysis uses a binomial test to statistically combine the results of the first analysis.

3.1 Search for the most significant neutrino-GRB correlation

Each GRB is studied using six pre-defined time windows with durations of 10 s, 25 s, 50 s, 100 s, 250 s, and 500 s centered in the middle of the $T_{prompt}$ window. These overlapping time windows cover or over-cover the vast majority of prompt phases of the 2268 GRBs in our list. Longer-than-prompt time windows are used to identify potential precursor and early afterglow neutrino-GRB correlations. The right panel of Figure 1 shows the distribution of $T_{prompt}$ for all the GRBs used in this work, as well as the duration of the time windows that we study. To characterize GRB neutrino emission, we use the time-integrated neutrino number flux:

F(E)=\int^{t_{b}}_{t_{a}}\frac{dN_{\nu+\bar{\nu}}}{dEdAdt}dt,

(1)

where $t_{a}$ and $t_{b}$ set the time window being considered and $dN_{\nu+\bar{\nu}}/dEdAdt$ is the number of neutrinos per unit of area, energy, and time. Equal values of $F(E)$ can be obtained for arbitrary neutrino time profiles within $t_{a}$ and $t_{b}$ .

The unbinned maximum likelihood method is a common approach to search for time-dependent neutrino sources (Braun et al., 2008). In this work, we use an extended likelihood, which is a function of the number of neutrino signal events, $n_{s}$ , the location of the sky that is being studied, $\vec{\Omega}$ , conditional on the expected number of background events, $n_{b}$ , and per-neutrino information $\mathbf{x}_{i}$ . The neutrino information $\mathbf{x}_{i}$ is reconstructed direction (right ascension, $\alpha_{i}$ and declination, $\delta_{i}$ ), neutrino angular uncertainty estimator $\sigma_{i}$ , neutrino arrival time $t_{i}$ , and reconstructed energy $E_{i}$ . The extended likelihood function is:

	$\displaystyle\mathcal{L}(\vec{\Omega},n_{s}\|n_{b},\left\{\mathbf{x}_{i}\right% \})=\frac{(n_{s}+n_{b})^{N}e^{-(n_{s}+n_{b})}}{N!}$
	$\displaystyle\times\prod_{i=1}^{N}\left(\frac{n_{s}}{n_{s}+n_{b}}\mathcal{S}(% \mathbf{x}_{i},\vec{\Omega})+\frac{n_{b}}{n_{s}+n_{b}}\mathcal{B}(\mathbf{x}_{% i},\vec{\Omega})\right),$		(2)

with the index $i$ iterating over all $N$ candidate neutrino events in a given time window. The Poisson term is frequently used by IceCube in transient neutrino analyses, including GRB studies (Aartsen et al., 2015, 2016, 2017a; Abbasi et al., 2022b), in which $n_{s}+n_{b}$ is a relatively small number. $\mathcal{S}(\cdot)$ and $\mathcal{B}(\cdot)$ are the signal and background probability density functions (PDFs) respectively. Both $\mathcal{S}(\cdot)$ and $\mathcal{B}(\cdot)$ are described as the product of a directional term and an energy term.

The directional term of $\mathcal{S}(\cdot)$ is represented by a Kent function (Kent, 1982).

S_{space}(\Delta\psi_{i})=\frac{\kappa}{4\pi\sinh\kappa}e^{\kappa\cos\Delta% \psi_{i}},

(3)

where $\Delta\psi_{i}$ is the angular difference between each reconstructed event direction and the direction, $\vec{\Omega}$ , being studied and $\kappa=1/\sigma_{i}^{2}$ . The choice of a Kent function, instead of a normal distribution is made because the angular uncertainty of GRECO-Astronomy events is relatively large. The background space PDF, $B_{i,space}$ , is a function of zenith only due to the approximate azimuthal symmetry of the IceCube-DeepCore detector, and is determined from 7.68 years of data, but excluding events from the corresponding time window around all of the GRBs. Background events in GRECO-Astronomy are $\sim$ 60% due to atmospheric neutrinos, and $\sim$ 40% due to down-going atmospheric muons (Abbasi et al., 2022c).

The energy term of the signal PDF is determined from simulations that assume an energy spectrum of $E^{-2.5}$ . This choice of spectrum was made so that the most sensitive energy range of the study would correspond to approximately 20 GeV to 500 GeV. The energy term of the background PDF is determined from 7.68 years of data, again, excluding events from the time window around all of the GRBs.

For each of the six time windows of a GRB, we perform a maximum likelihood fit over the entire sky, placing $\vec{\Omega}$ at the center of each bin of the Nside=64 HEALPix map. The maximization is done for $n_{s}$ only, and we obtain a best-fit value $\hat{n}_{s}$ for each $\vec{\Omega}$ and time window. For each GRB time window we define the sky-map $\Lambda_{\nu}(\vec{\Omega})$ :

	$\displaystyle\Lambda_{\nu}(\vec{\Omega})$	$\displaystyle=$	$\displaystyle 2\cdot\log\left[\frac{\mathcal{L}(\hat{n}_{s},\vec{\Omega})}{% \mathcal{L}(n_{s}=0,\vec{\Omega})}\right]$		(4)
		$\displaystyle=$	$\displaystyle-2\hat{n}_{s}+2\sum_{i=1}^{N}\log\left[\frac{\hat{n}_{s}S(\mathbf% {x}_{i},\vec{\Omega})}{n_{b}B(\mathbf{x}_{i},\vec{\Omega})}+1\right].$		(4)

Note that the sky-map $\Lambda_{\nu}(\vec{\Omega})$ depends only on neutrino data. Up to this point, we have not used GRB positions or localization uncertainties. To include this information, and similarly to Abbasi et al. (2022b), we use the previously described Fermi-GBM HEALPix maps, or synthetic maps, as a prior on the final test statistic. We define a weight $w(\vec{\Omega})=P(\vec{\Omega})/P_{max}$ for each GRB map. Here $P(\vec{\Omega})$ is the GRB localization probability evaluated at each sky location $\vec{\Omega}$ , and $P_{max}$ is the maximum probability for the map of this GRB. The combined sky-map of neutrino and GRB information, $\Lambda_{final}(\vec{\Omega})$ is defined as:

	$\displaystyle\Lambda_{final}(\vec{\Omega})$	$\displaystyle=$	$\displaystyle 2\cdot\log\left[w(\vec{\Omega})\frac{\mathcal{L}(\hat{n}_{s},% \vec{\Omega})}{\mathcal{L_{\nu}}(n_{s}=0,\vec{\Omega})}\right]$		(5)
		$\displaystyle=$	$\displaystyle\Lambda_{\nu}(\vec{\Omega})+2\log(w(\vec{\Omega})).$		(5)

This all-sky map has a maximum value at $\hat{\vec{\Omega}}$ , which for each GRB and each time window, defines the test statistic used in this work,

TS=\Lambda_{final}(\hat{\vec{\Omega}}).

(6)

To estimate the significance of $TS$ , we use a large number of scramblings. This is a standard technique in IceCube, in which the time of each event is randomized within the live time of IceCube being studied. This procedure keeps the reconstructed neutrino direction detector coordinates constant but randomizes the reconstructed neutrino right ascension. Given the very large duration of the live time compared to the total duration of all the time windows that we study, each scrambling dataset is a good approximation of the background expectation. In this work, we have used 1000,000 scramblings.

The significance of correlations between neutrino events and each GRB for a given time window is quantified as a $p$ -value by comparing the measured $TS$ to the background-only $TS$ distribution. The background-only $TS$ distribution is obtained via scramblings.

At this stage, we have a total of six $p$ -values for each GRB, corresponding to the six time windows that have been studied. For each GRB we choose the most significant of the six $p$ -values. We calculate a trial correction for the look-elsewhere effect for this choice by using the scrambled data cumulative distribution function of the $p$ -value of the most significant time window. For each GRB we now have the most significant time window for correlation and the best fit $\hat{n}_{s}$ for this time window and a single per-GRB $p$ -value.

Finally, the most significant per-GRB $p$ -value is selected and trial-corrected to account for 2268 GRBs in the search. This results in the most significant GRB, its most significant time window, the best fit $\hat{n}_{s}$ for this GRB time window, and the post-trial $p$ -value.

To characterize the performance of this analysis, we use sensitivity and $5\sigma$ discovery potential. With repeated simulated signal injected over background scramblings, we can calculate the signal $TS$ distribution. The sensitivity is the signal strength needed so that 90% of the signal-injected $TS$ is above the median $TS$ for background scramblings. The 5 $\sigma$ discovery potential is defined as the signal strength required for the injected median $TS$ to be greater than the $5\sigma$ threshold of the background scrambling $TS$ distribution.

Figure 2 shows the 90% sensitivity and $5\sigma$ discovery potential for all six time windows for the most significant GRB identified in this analysis, bn 140807500. Neutrino acceptance and background rates vary slowly with declination in GRECO-Astronomy. This results in sensitivity and $5\sigma$ discovery potential that vary by, at most, a factor of $\sim$ 2 from the northern sky (best) to the southern sky (worst) (Abbasi et al., 2022c). This is unlike GRB studies with TeV–PeV neutrinos in which sensitivity and $5\sigma$ discovery potential for northern declinations is a factor of $\sim$ 20 better than for southern declinations (Abbasi et al., 2022b). At the South Pole, the intense down-going cosmic ray muon background worsens southern sky sensitivity for TeV–PeV neutrinos compared to the northern sky. As the background rate in the work presented here is very low, sensitivity and $5\sigma$ discovery potential do not depend strongly on the GRB localization uncertainty. This is because the angular uncertainty of GRECO-Astronomy events is typically larger than GRB localization uncertainty. For example, a GRB localized to $15^{\circ}$ has $\sim$ 15% higher background rate than one localized to $1^{\circ}$ . GRB localization uncertainty has a smaller influence on sensitivity and $5\sigma$ discovery potential than declination.

3.2 Binomial Test

We statistically combine per-GRB $p$ -values for the most significant time window, to search for a subgroup of GRBs that may be significant neutrino emitters. This case can be interesting when each individual GRB is not statistically significant by itself. The binomial probability, which has been used by IceCube in other works, e.g., Aartsen et al. (2020c), is given by:

P(k)=\sum_{m=k}^{N}\frac{N!}{(N-m)!m!}{p_{k}}^{m}(1-p_{k})^{N-m}.

(7)

Here the pre-trial binomial $p$ -value $P(k)$ denotes the probability of $k$ or more GRBs with $p$ -values smaller than $p_{k}$ appearing among the background, where $p_{k}$ is the $k$ th smallest pre-trial $p$ -value in the final GRB list. Taking into account the number of independent GRBs (2268), we adjust the probability of observing a given result by chance with the cumulative density function (CDF) made out of the most significant binomial $p$ -values obtained from 100 million null hypothesis binomial tests. The smallest pre-trial binomial $p$ -value $P(k)$ obtained at a size of subgroup $k$ is corrected for trials and reported as post-trial binomial $p$ -value $P_{binom}$ .

3.3 Systematic Uncertainties

We have estimated systematic uncertainties by varying parameters that affect signal efficiency or background rate. These include the optical properties of glacial ice, such as scattering and absorption; the relative DOM efficiency; the optical properties of the refrozen ice column in each IceCube string, aka “hole ice”, resulting from the ice drilling; and the seasonal variations (Abbasi et al., 2023c) on the rate of GRECO-Astronomy events. Following (Abbasi et al., 2022c) we simulated changes of $\pm$ 10% in DOM efficiency, $\pm$ 10% in the absorption coefficient, $\pm$ 10 effective scattering coefficient, and $\pm$ 1 $\sigma$ variations in hole ice optical properties. Because background is estimated via scrambling only seasonal variations are relevant as systematics. Signal, on the other hand, is affected by the other parameters described.

To estimate systematic uncertainties for signal, we conducted simulations assuming a subphotospheric neutron-proton collision model with $\Gamma=300$ and a time search window of 2200 s. These values are appropriate for GRB 221009A. We find that the uncertainty in absorption length can degrade the sensitivity by 6.6%; effective scattering length by 4.5%, DOM efficiency by 3.8%, and hole ice by 8.7%.

To evaluate the effect of seasonal variation, we considered the 1 $\sigma$ background rate range for GRECO-Astronomy. Over the year, this corresponds to $\pm$ 10% around the average of 4.6 mHz or 16.6 events per hour (before the final $E_{reco}>10$ GeV cut). We implemented a method in which we changed the local background rate by $\pm$ 10% compared to the scrambled background rate. We used an ensemble of background scramblings with three different background rates for the pre-computed background scans. We find that seasonal variations can change sensitivity by 3%.

We add in quadrature all the systematics uncertainties and find that the sensitivity can be degraded by 13%. Performing a similar procedure for the $5\sigma$ discovery potential, we obtain that it can be degraded by 14%. We adopt both these values to degrade limits, sensitivities, and 5 $\sigma$ discovery potentials presented here.

We have cross-checked these systematic uncertainty estimates with two other scenarios. In one scenario the Lorentz factor was increased to $\Gamma=800$ . In this case, the total systematic uncertainty on sensitivity was reduced from 13% to 11%. We attribute the difference to the higher energy of events for a larger Lorentz boost factor. In the second scenario, we changed the time of the search from 2200 s to 221.1 s, the $T_{90}$ of GRB 221009A. In this case, the systematic for the sensitivity was reduced from 13% to 10%. A lower systematic is found for shorter time windows which is consistent with Abbasi et al. (2022c) which had larger systematic uncertainties but considered time windows of weeks-time scale. The $\Gamma=300$ and search window of 2200 s are conservative as they correspond to the lowest energy events and to the longest time window we consider.

4 Results

\centerwidetable

Table 1: Top three most significant GRBs in the individual search analysis. The table shows the GRB name; start time of

T_{prompt}

; right ascension; declination; circularized localization uncertainty; most significant time window duration; best-fit

\hat{n}_{s}

number of neutrino events in coincidence with the GRB; all-flavor neutrino number flux

F_{\nu+\bar{\nu}}(E)

upper limit times

E^{2}

for the most significant time window

TW

for two spectral indices; whether or not a synthetic prior was used; the GRB pre-trial

p

-value, corrected for the 6-time windows used in this analysis; and the post-trail

p

-value for the most significant burst. The right ascension and declination for bn 140708500 and bn 160804968 are for

P_{max}

of the GBM map.

GRB

Start time

Dec

Loc.

\hat{n}_{s}

E^{2}F_{\nu+\bar{\nu}}(E)

Upper Limit

Synth.

Pre-trial

Post-trial

Name

Unc.

Satellite

\gamma=2.5|_{100\mathrm{GeV}}

\gamma=2.0

prior

p

-value

p

-value

(UTC)

(^∘)

(s)

(10^-5erg cm^-2 s^-1)

bn 140807500

2014-08-07

11:59:33

198.3

31.7

4.4

GBM

100

1.08

12.84

5.24

4.6\times 10^{-6}

0.097

bn 160804968

2016-08-04

23:13:34

82.3

-23.0

9.1

GBM

100

2.81

23.04

11.94

9.6\times 10^{-4}

–

GRB 160802A

2016-08-02

06:13:30

28.1

71.4

1.0

IPN

2.74

16.92

8.26

Yes

1.3\times 10^{-3}

–

The most significant GRB-neutrino correlation identified among 2268 GRBs is the Fermi-GBM GRB bn 140807500. The $p$ -value, corrected for the 6 time windows, is $4.6\times 10^{-5}$ and is found for a time window of 100 s with the best-fit number of events $\hat{n}_{s}=1.08$ . After correcting for trials for 2268 GRBs we obtain a post-trial $p$ -value of $0.097$ ( $1.3\sigma$ ). Burst bn 140807500 triggered Fermi-GBM on August 7, 2014. This is a short GRB with $T_{90}=0.512\pm 0.202$ s and an energy fluence of ( $1.289\pm 0.014)\times 10^{-6}$ erg/cm² (Coppin, 2021). Because only Fermi-GBM identified this burst, the $T_{90}$ matches $T_{prompt}$ .

This analysis uses the Fermi-GBM maps whenever they are available, where the most likely location of this GRB is right ascension $\alpha=$ 198.3^∘ and declination $\delta=31.7^{\circ}$ . Two neutrino candidates are identified in IceCube-DeepCore in the 100 second time window around the center of $T_{prompt}$ for bn 140807500. Event one is identified as a cascade detected 33.67 seconds before the center of the $T_{prompt}$ window. This cascade has a reconstructed energy of 50 GeV. The best-fit reconstructed direction is $\alpha=76.8^{\circ}$ and $\delta=-51.5^{\circ}$ , which is $133.5^{\circ}$ away from the most likely GRB location. Event one has a circularized directional uncertainty of $35.4^{\circ}$ . Event two is a starting track detected 38.58 seconds after the center of the $T_{prompt}$ window. The reconstructed energy is 221 GeV. The best-fit reconstructed direction is $\alpha=200.2^{\circ}$ and $\delta=33.3^{\circ}$ , which is $2.3^{\circ}$ away from the most likely GRB location. Event two has a circularized directional uncertainty of $1.0^{\circ}$ . Figure 3 shows the localization probability skymap of bn 140807500 provided by Fermi-GBM, the $\Lambda_{\nu}$ all-sky scan from neutrino events within the 100 s time window, and the $\Lambda_{final}$ skymap. Figure 3 shows that the second neutrino candidate is responsible for a relatively high test statistic. Table 1 shows the three most significant GRB-neutrino coincidences identified.

The smallest binomial $p$ -value is $P(k=1)=0.099$ with index $k=1$ with threshold $p$ -value $p_{k}=4.6\times 10^{-5}$ . After correcting for trials due to testing multiple thresholds, the post-trial binomial $p$ -value of 0.65 is obtained. So no additional neutrino event-GRB correlations, besides bn 140807500, are identified with the binomial test.

5 Constraint on baryon loading

We have followed calculations by Murase et al. (2013) and Murase et al. (2022), for the neutron-proton collision scenario, to obtain an all-flavor neutrino signal expectation for the GRBs used in this work. The authors of these works provided us with neutrino spectra which allow the calculation of $E^{2}F(E)$ (Murase, 2022). Given a GRB, the model depends on the gamma-ray energy fluence of the prompt phase $f_{\gamma}$ , redshift $z$ , and the product of baryon loading times the neutron-proton opacity $\xi_{N}\tau_{np}$ . Following Murase et al. (2013) we adopt the definition of the baryon loading as the ratio of the equivalent isotropic energies in baryons to gamma rays, $\xi_{N}=E_{N,iso}/E_{\gamma,iso}$ , with $\xi_{N}=5$ and $\tau_{np}=1$ as default model values.

Of the 2268 GRBs studied here, four do not have a measured energy fluence in GRBWeb so we exclude these GRBs from the calculation. Only 198 GRBs have a measured redshift, of which 187 are long and 11 are short GRBs. Among these, the mean redshift for long GRBs is 2.0 and, for short GRBs is 0.7. In our calculations for GRBs without a measured redshift we adopt a default value of $z=0.7$ for short GRBs and $z=2.0$ for long GRBs. With a Lorentz factor of $\Gamma=300$ (800), and default $\xi_{N}\tau_{np}=5$ we obtain an all-flavor neutrino signal, using GRECO-Astronomy simulation with $E_{reco}>$ 10 GeV, in IceCube-DeepCore of 0.64 (1.39) events for all 2264 GRBs combined. As a systematic check, we have redone the calculation for 2264 GRBs by assuming $z=0.25$ and $z=1.0$ for short and long GRBs respectively, that do not have a measured redshift. We find for this check a signal expectation of 0.64 (1.24). Therefore we find that the lack of redshift information for most GRBs does not significantly affect the neutrino signal prediction for the sub-photospheric model.

The all-flavor signal expectation for 2264 GRBs can be compared to that for GRB 221009A. For the latter, we use z=0.151 (de Ugarte Postigo et al., 2022), an energy fluence measured by Konus-Wind of $f_{\gamma}=1.2\times 10^{55}$ erg (Frederiks et al., 2023), $\xi_{N}\tau_{np}=5$ and Lorentz factor of 300 (800). This results in an expectation of 4.72 (8.56) events. Alternatively, using the energy fluence measured by Fermi-GBM, $f_{\gamma}=1.0\times 10^{55}$ erg (Lesage et al., 2023), results in a factor $\times 1.2$ lower signal expectation, as $F(E)$ is proportional to $f_{\gamma}$ .

Remarkably, GRB 221009A has a larger neutrino signal expectation in IceCube-DeepCore than the other 2264 GRBs combined, by a factor of 6 to 8. Even if we assume redshift values for bursts without a redshift measurement that are significantly smaller than typical, we still find that GRB 221009A has a larger signal expectation over the other 2264 GRBs combined by a similar factor. A comparison of $E^{2}F(E)$ for GRB 221009A and 2264 GRBs combined is shown in Figure 4. There are two reasons why GRB 221009A has a larger neutrino signal expectation than the combination of the GRBs studied here. First, neutrinos of higher energy are easier to identify and correlate with GRBs because they typically have lower angular uncertainty and because the detector has a higher efficiency for detecting them. The peak energy of $E^{2}F(E)$ , seen in Figure 4, is inversely proportional to $(1+z)$ and the redshift of GRB 221009A is small. So GRB 221009A has higher energy neutrinos than a GRB at $z=2$ . Second, GRB 221009A has an extremely high energy fluence, and the height of the peak of $E^{2}F(E)$ seen in Figure 4 is proportional to $f_{\gamma}$ .

The parameter product $\xi_{N}\tau_{np}$ is unknown for all GRBs. We assume $\tau_{np}=1$ , which leaves the baryon loading unknown. Knowledge of the baryon loading can provide information about the environment for the formation of the jet. The best constraint on $\xi_{N}\tau_{np}$ can be derived from GRB 221009A for two reasons: GRB 221009A’s high signal expectation compared to the set of 2264 GRBs and the lack of correlated neutrino events reported in Abbasi et al. (2023a); and because for 2264 GRBs, with a per GRB window of 500 s, background accumulates over 1,132,000 s (13 days), while for GRB 221009A the background is only over a single time window of 2200 s. For GRB 221009A we calculate the constraint on $\xi_{N}$ using the 2200 s time window, as this includes observations prior to the prompt phase. Stating that the constraint from GRB 221009A is the most restrictive, assumes that GRB 221009A has similar characteristics as all other GRBs. This assumption may not be valid, e.g., because of the unusually high isotropic equivalent energy of GRB 221009A. Therefore there is still important, complementary information provided by the neutrino flux constraints we have placed on the other 2268 GRBs.

With a Lorentz factor of 300 (800) and a time window of 2200 s, the upper limit on $E^{2}F(E)$ for GRB 221009A is a factor of 1.65 (2.98), lower than predicted by the model in Murase et al. (2022), but updated to use the Konus-Wind energy fluence. This upper limit directly translates into a constraint of $\xi_{N}\tau_{np}<$ 3.85 (2.13) for a Lorentz factor of 300 (800). In Figure 5 the left panel shows the canonical model prediction for GRB 221009A and GRECO-Astronomy limits from Abbasi et al. (2023b) for a Lorentz factor of $\Gamma=400$ . The right panel shows the constraint on $\xi_{N}\tau_{np}$ as a function of the Lorentz factor.

Lesage et al. (2023) provide lower bounds on the Lorentz factor of GRB 221009A under various modeling scenarios. Requiring no photon-photon $e^{+}e^{-}$ pair production for the highest energy photons observed in Fermi-GBM and using a single zone model, they set a constraint of $\Gamma\gtrsim 1560$ . However, under more realistic scenarios, the lower bound is a factor of 2 lower or $\Gamma\gtrsim 780$ . Figure 5 is agnostic to the choice of Lorentz factor, but taking a value of $\Gamma=780$ , results in a constraint on the baryon loading that is significantly lower than the canonical theoretical value.

The constraint on baryon loading we present here is complementary to that which can be set, also for GRB 221009A, using TeV–PeV neutrinos. With 10–1000 GeV neutrinos, the limit on $\xi_{N}\tau_{np}$ is more constraining as the Lorentz factor increases. This is because the peak value of $E^{2}F(E)$ does not depend on the Lorentz factor but the energy for which $E^{2}F(E)$ peaks depends linearly on the Lorentz factor. A higher value of the Lorentz factor results, on average, on higher-energy neutrinos, which are easier to detect and correlate to a GRB. The situation is reversed for TeV–PeV neutrinos in which the constraint on the baryon loading is best for low values of the Lorentz factor. For both the internal shock model and the Internal-Collision-Induced Magnetic Reconnection and Turbulence, ICMART, (Zhang & Yan, 2011; Zhang & Kumar, 2013) model which predict TeV–PeV neutrinos, the peak value of $E^{2}F(E)$ is lower for larger values of the Lorentz factor. Using TeV–PeV neutrinos, the 90% confidence level upper limit on the baryon loading, derived from GRB 221009A, under the internal shock model and for $\Gamma=300$ , is $\xi_{N}<0.55$ . Under the same assumptions, but for the ICMART model, the limit is $\xi_{N}<2.97$ (Abbasi et al., 2023b).

6 Comparison of results of prior IceCube GRB studies

Figure 6 shows a comparison of limits on $E^{2}F(E)$ for several GRBs set by IceCube using GRECO-Astronomy and TeV–PeV searches. It is worth noticing that the recent study of correlations and GRBs for $\gtrsim$ TeV neutrinos (Abbasi et al., 2022b) also found a correlation between bn 140807500 and event two (See section 4). In that work, bn 140807500 was the most likely GRB-neutrino correlation among short GRBs in the northern sky (which IceCube defines as $\delta>-5^{\circ}$ ). The dataset used on Abbasi et al. (2022b) was collected from April 2012 to October 2018. During this data period, 2.9% of the events in the data used in the current work are also found in Abbasi et al. (2022b). Because event two is an event that starts in DeepCore and has relatively high energy, it is not surprising that both analyses identify it.

7 Conclusions

Using IceCube data and public GRB data, we have studied 10–1000 GeV neutrino and GRB correlations for 2268 GRBs detected over 8 years. No evidence for neutrino emission by GRBs is found using either of the two analysis methods. In the first method, we search for the most statistically significant GRB-neutrino correlation. The most significant GRB is Fermi-GBM bn 140807500 with a post-trial p-value of 0.097. In the second method, we statistically combined the results for all 2268 GRBs to search for a set of GRBs that could be significant as a group but not individually. We do not find any additional burst, besides bn 140807500, to possibly contribute, and the p-value for this test is 0.65.

We compare sub-photospheric model predictions for a subset of 2264 GRBs, with prompt gamma-ray energy-fluence measurements, to the sub-photospheric model prediction of the Brightest of all time GRB 221009A. We find that in the subphotospheric model, GRB 221009A results in a neutrino signal in IceCube-DeepCore that is $\gtrsim$ 6 larger than for the combined set of 2264 GRBs. We use previously calculated limits on neutrino emission for GRB 221009A to constrain the baryon loading of the jet. For a Lorentz factor of 300 (800), the baryon loading on GRB 221009A is lower than 3.85 (2.13) at a 90% confidence level. The set of 2268 GRBs may still be useful to constrain models besides the sub-photospheric model.

While GRECO-Astronomy cannot reach the sensitivity that the TeV–PeV searches achieve for northern sky GRBs, it covers a complementary energy range where different physical mechanisms of neutrino emission can be explored.

Future work that benefits from the use of the IceCube-Upgrade (Ishihara, 2021) will enhance the sensitivity of IceCube-DeepCore to 10–1000 GeV neutrinos as the angular resolution of reconstructed events is expected to improve.

We are grateful to K. Murase for providing templates of neutrino spectra necessary to calculate neutrino fluxes for the sub-photospheric model under the collision scenario. We are grateful to J. Wood, and A. Goldstein for suggestions that improved this manuscript. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the following agencies and institutions: USA – U.S. National Science Foundation-Office of Polar Programs, U.S. National Science Foundation-Physics Division, U.S. National Science Foundation-EPSCoR, U.S. National Science Foundation-Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure, Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, Center for High Throughput Computing (CHTC) at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, Open Science Grid (OSG), Partnership to Advance Throughput Computing (PATh), Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem: Services & Support (ACCESS), Frontera computing project at the Texas Advanced Computing Center, U.S. Department of Energy-National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, Particle astrophysics research computing center at the University of Maryland, Institute for Cyber-Enabled Research at Michigan State University, Astroparticle physics computational facility at Marquette University, NVIDIA Corporation, and Google Cloud Platform; Belgium – Funds for Scientific Research (FRS-FNRS and FWO), FWO Odysseus and Big Science programmes, and Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (Belspo); Germany – Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Helmholtz Alliance for Astroparticle Physics (HAP), Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association, Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron (DESY), and High Performance Computing cluster of the RWTH Aachen; Sweden – Swedish Research Council, Swedish Polar Research Secretariat, Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC), and Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation; European Union – EGI Advanced Computing for research; Australia – Australian Research Council; Canada – Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Calcul Québec, Compute Ontario, Canada Foundation for Innovation, WestGrid, and Digital Research Alliance of Canada; Denmark – Villum Fonden, Carlsberg Foundation, and European Commission; New Zealand – Marsden Fund; Japan – Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS) and Institute for Global Prominent Research (IGPR) of Chiba University; Korea – National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF); Switzerland – Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF).

References

Aartsen et al. (2013) Aartsen, M. G., Abbasi, R., Abdou, Y., et al. 2013, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 711, 73, doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2013.01.054
Aartsen et al. (2016) Aartsen, M. G., Abraham, K., Ackermann, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 824, 115, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/824/2/115
Aartsen et al. (2015) Aartsen, M. G., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 805, L5, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/805/1/L5
Aartsen et al. (2017a) —. 2017a, ApJ, 843, 112, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7569
Aartsen et al. (2017b) —. 2017b, Journal of Instrumentation, 12, P03012, doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/12/03/P03012
Aartsen et al. (2020a) —. 2020a, Phys. Rev. Lett., 125, 121104, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121104
Aartsen et al. (2020b) —. 2020b, Journal of Instrumentation, 15, P06032, doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/15/06/P06032
Aartsen et al. (2020c) —. 2020c, Phys. Rev. Lett., 124, 051103, doi: "https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.051103"
Abbasi et al. (2012a) Abbasi, R., Abdou, Y. Abu-Zayyad, T., et al. 2012a, Nature, 484, 351, doi: 10.1038/nature11068
Abbasi et al. (2012b) —. 2012b, Astroparticle Physics, 35, 615, doi: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.01.004
Abbasi et al. (2009) Abbasi, R., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al. 2009, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 601, 294, doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2009.01.001
Abbasi et al. (2021) —. 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 104, 022002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.022002
Abbasi et al. (2022a) —. 2022a, ApJ, 928, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4d29
Abbasi et al. (2022b) —. 2022b, ApJ, 939, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9785
Abbasi et al. (2022c) —. 2022c, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2212.06810, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2212.06810
Abbasi et al. (2023a) —. 2023a, ApJ, 946, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc077
Abbasi et al. (2023b) —. 2023b, PoS, ICRC2023, 1511, doi: 10.22323/1.444.1511
Abbasi et al. (2023c) —. 2023c, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2303.04682, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.04682
Abbott et al. (2017) Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2017, Phys. Rev. Lett., 119, 161101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101
Albert et al. (2017) Albert, A., André, M., Anghinolfi, M., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 469, 906, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx902
Albert et al. (2021a) —. 2021a, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys, 2021, 092, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/092
Albert et al. (2021b) —. 2021b, MNRAS, 500, 5614, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3503
Atwood et al. (2009) Atwood, W. B., Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1071, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1071
Bahcall & Mészáros (2000) Bahcall, J. N., & Mészáros, P. 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 1362, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1362
Barthelmy et al. (2005) Barthelmy, S. D., Barbier, L. M., Cummings, J. R., et al. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 120, 143, doi: 10.1007/s11214-005-5096-3
Braun et al. (2008) Braun, J., Dumm, K., De Palma, F., et al. 2008, Astroparticle Physics, 29, 299, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2008.02.007
Burns et al. (2023) Burns, E., Svinkin, D., Fenimore, E., et al. 2023, ApJ, 946, L31, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc39c
Cano et al. (2017) Cano, Z., Wang, S., Dai, Z., & Wu, X. 2017, Advances in Astronomy, 2017, 8929054, doi: 10.1155/2017/8929054
Coppin (2021) Coppin, P. 2021, GRBweb [Online], https://user-web.icecube.wisc.edu/~grbweb_public/
de Ugarte Postigo et al. (2022) de Ugarte Postigo, A., Izzo, L., Pugliese, G., et al. 2022, GRB Coordinates Network, 32648, 1
Frederiks et al. (2023) Frederiks, D., Svinkin, D., Lysenko, A. L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 949, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd1eb
Goldstein et al. (2020) Goldstein, A., Fletcher, C., Veres, P., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8bdb
Goldstein & Wood (2022) Goldstein, A., & Wood, J. 2022, Fermi-GBM Data Release Related to Searches for Neutrinos from Gamma-Ray Bursts using the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6727152
Górski et al. (2005) Górski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., et al. 2005, ApJ, 622, 759, doi: 10.1086/427976
Hjorth (2013) Hjorth, J. 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 371, 20120275, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0275
Hurley et al. (2013) Hurley, Pal’shin, K. V. D., Aptekar, R. L., et al. 2013, ApJS, 207, 39, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/207/2/39
Ishihara (2021) Ishihara, A. 2021, in PoS(ICRC2019)1031, doi: "http://doi.org/10.22323/1.358.1031"
Kangas & Fruchter (2021) Kangas, T., & Fruchter, A. S. 2021, ApJ, 911, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe76b
Kent (1982) Kent, J. T. 1982, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 44, 71
KM3NeT Collaboration (2022) KM3NeT Collaboration. 2022, GRB Coordinates Network, 32741, 1
Lesage et al. (2023) Lesage, S., Veres, P., Briggs, M. S., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2303.14172, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.14172
Meegan et al. (2009) Meegan, C., Lichti, G., Bhat, P. N., et al. 2009, ApJ, 702, 791, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/791
Mészáros & Waxman (2001) Mészáros, P., & Waxman, E. 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 171102, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.171102
Murase (2022) Murase, K. 2022, Sub-photospheric neutrino spectra templates [Online], https://github.com/pegasuskmurase/ModelTemplates/tree/main/GRBnu
Murase & Ioka (2013) Murase, K., & Ioka, K. 2013, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, 121102, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.121102
Murase et al. (2013) Murase, K., Kashiyama, K., & Mészáros, P. 2013, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, 131102, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.131102
Murase et al. (2022) Murase, K., Mukhopadhyay, M., Kheirandish, A., Kimura, S. S., & Fang, K. 2022, ApJ, 941, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aca3ae
Orii et al. (2021) Orii, A., Abe, K., Bronner, C., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2101.03480. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.03480
Piran (1999) Piran, T. 1999, Phys. Rep., 314, 575, doi: 10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00127-6
Piran (2004) —. 2004, Reviews of Modern Physics, 76, 1143, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1143
Razzaque et al. (2003) Razzaque, S., Mészáros, P., & Waxman, E. 2003, Phys. Rev. D, 68, 083001, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.083001
Vietri (1995) Vietri, M. 1995, ApJ, 453, 883, doi: 10.1086/176448
Waxman (1995) Waxman, E. 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 386, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.386
Waxman & Bahcall (1997) Waxman, E., & Bahcall, J. N. 1997, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 2292, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2292
Waxman & Bahcall (2000) Waxman, E., & Bahcall, J. N. 2000, ApJ, 541, 707, doi: 10.1086/309462
Zhang & Kumar (2013) Zhang, B., & Kumar, P. 2013, Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 121101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.121101
Zhang & Yan (2011) Zhang, B., & Yan, H. 2011, ApJ, 726, 90, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/726/2/90