Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Jones Wenzl projectors in Verma modules

Ryoga Matsumoto
Abstract

We construct special idempotents in EndUq(𝔰𝔩2)(M(μ1)M(μn))subscriptEndsubscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2tensor-product𝑀subscript𝜇1𝑀subscript𝜇𝑛\mathrm{End}_{U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})}(M(\mu_{1})\otimes\cdots\otimes M(\mu_{% n}))roman_End start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_M ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ⊗ ⋯ ⊗ italic_M ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ) like the Jones Wenzl projector where M(μi)𝑀subscript𝜇𝑖M(\mu_{i})italic_M ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) is Verma module whose highest weight is μisubscript𝜇𝑖\mu_{i}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and is complex number except non-negative integer.

1 Introduction

Temperley Lieb algebra is introduced in [TemperleyLieb] to solve the problems of statistical physics. Furthermore, Wenzl introduced the special idempotents in Temperley Lieb algebra called Jones Wenzl idempotent in [Wenzl]. The Jones Wenzl idempotent plays an important role in topology. Murakami and Murakami constructed knot invariants using the Jones Wenzl idempotent in [MurakamiMurakami]. The knot invariants extend the Jones polynomial obtained in [Jones]. It is known that Temperley Lieb algebra is isomorphic to the endomorphism algebra of tensor products of 2222-dimensional irreducible representation over Uq(𝔰𝔩2)subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) in [AndersenLehrerZhang]. Then it is important to consider the idempotents in endomorphism algebras of tensor products of Uq(𝔰𝔩2)subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) representations. In [LacabanneTubbenhauerVaz], the structure of the endomorphism algebra of tensor products of Verma modules over Uq(𝔰𝔩2)subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) is determined using Howe duality-like method. However, the special idempotent of the endomorphism algebra like the Jones Wenzl idempotent has not been constructed. In this article, we construct special idempotents in EndUq(𝔰𝔩2)(M(μ1)M(μn))subscriptEndsubscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2tensor-product𝑀subscript𝜇1𝑀subscript𝜇𝑛\mathrm{End}_{U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})}(M(\mu_{1})\otimes\cdots\otimes M(\mu_{% n}))roman_End start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_M ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ⊗ ⋯ ⊗ italic_M ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ) like Jones Wenzl projector where μisubscript𝜇𝑖\mu_{i}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is complex number without non-negative integer. More precisely, we obtain the following.

Theorem 1.1.

There exists an element Pμ1,,μnEndUq(𝔰𝔩2)(M(μ1)M(μn))subscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑛subscriptEndsubscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2tensor-product𝑀subscript𝜇1𝑀subscript𝜇𝑛P_{\mu_{1},\ldots,\mu_{n}}\in\mathrm{End}_{U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})}(M(\mu_{1}% )\otimes\cdots\otimes M(\mu_{n}))italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ roman_End start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_M ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ⊗ ⋯ ⊗ italic_M ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ) as follows.

Pμ1,,μn2superscriptsubscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑛2\displaystyle P_{\mu_{1},\ldots,\mu_{n}}^{2}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =Pμ1,,μnabsentsubscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑛\displaystyle=P_{\mu_{1},\ldots,\mu_{n}}= italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Yuji Terashima for valuable discussions. This work was supported by JST, the establishment of university fellowships towards the creation of science technology innovation, Grant Number JPMJFS2102.

2 Representation of Uq(𝔰𝔩2)subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )

In this section, we define the quantum algebra Uq(𝔰𝔩2)subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) and the representations. Hereinafter, suppose that q𝑞qitalic_q is generic.

Definition 2.1.

The quantum group Uq(𝔰𝔩2)subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) of 𝔰𝔩2𝔰subscript𝔩2\mathfrak{sl}_{2}fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the algebra on (q)𝑞\mathbb{C}(q)blackboard_C ( italic_q ) generated by the elements K,K1,E,F𝐾superscript𝐾1𝐸𝐹K,K^{-1},E,Fitalic_K , italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_E , italic_F that satisfy the following relations.

KK1=1=K1K,KE=q2EKKF=q2FK,EFFE=KK1qq1formulae-sequence𝐾superscript𝐾11superscript𝐾1𝐾formulae-sequence𝐾𝐸superscript𝑞2𝐸𝐾formulae-sequence𝐾𝐹superscript𝑞2𝐹𝐾𝐸𝐹𝐹𝐸𝐾superscript𝐾1𝑞superscript𝑞1\displaystyle KK^{-1}=1=K^{-1}K,\quad KE=q^{2}EK\quad KF=q^{-2}FK,\quad EF-FE=% \frac{K-K^{-1}}{q-q^{-1}}italic_K italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1 = italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K , italic_K italic_E = italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_E italic_K italic_K italic_F = italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F italic_K , italic_E italic_F - italic_F italic_E = divide start_ARG italic_K - italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_q - italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG

The coproduct Δ:Uq(𝔰𝔩2)Uq(𝔰𝔩2)Uq(𝔰𝔩2):Δsubscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2tensor-productsubscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2\Delta:U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})\rightarrow U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})\otimes U_{% q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})roman_Δ : italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) → italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ⊗ italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) is defined below on the algebra.

Δ(K±1):=K±1K±1,Δ(F):=F1+K1F,Δ(E):=EK+1Eformulae-sequenceassignΔsuperscript𝐾plus-or-minus1tensor-productsuperscript𝐾plus-or-minus1superscript𝐾plus-or-minus1formulae-sequenceassignΔ𝐹tensor-product𝐹1tensor-productsuperscript𝐾1𝐹assignΔ𝐸tensor-product𝐸𝐾tensor-product1𝐸\displaystyle\Delta(K^{\pm 1}):=K^{\pm 1}\otimes K^{\pm 1},\quad\Delta(F):=F% \otimes 1+K^{-1}\otimes F,\quad\Delta(E):=E\otimes K+1\otimes Eroman_Δ ( italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) := italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⊗ italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , roman_Δ ( italic_F ) := italic_F ⊗ 1 + italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⊗ italic_F , roman_Δ ( italic_E ) := italic_E ⊗ italic_K + 1 ⊗ italic_E
Definition 2.2.

Let μ𝜇\muitalic_μ be a complex number. Then,

[μ]:=qμqμqq1assigndelimited-[]𝜇superscript𝑞𝜇superscript𝑞𝜇𝑞superscript𝑞1[\mu]:=\frac{q^{\mu}-q^{-\mu}}{q-q^{-1}}[ italic_μ ] := divide start_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_q - italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG
Definition 2.3.

k+1𝑘1k+1italic_k + 1-dimensional irreducible representation Vksubscript𝑉𝑘V_{k}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over (q)𝑞\mathbb{C}(q)blackboard_C ( italic_q ) has a basis {v0,v1,,vk}subscript𝑣0subscript𝑣1subscript𝑣𝑘\{v_{0},v_{1},\cdots,v_{k}\}{ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } called an induced basis and satisfies the following relations for the generators of Uq(𝔰𝔩2)subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ).

Kvi:=qk2iviassign𝐾subscript𝑣𝑖superscript𝑞𝑘2𝑖subscript𝑣𝑖\displaystyle K\cdot v_{i}:=q^{k-2i}v_{i}italic_K ⋅ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 2 italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Evi:=[i]vi1assign𝐸subscript𝑣𝑖delimited-[]𝑖subscript𝑣𝑖1\displaystyle E\cdot v_{i}:=[i]v_{i-1}italic_E ⋅ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := [ italic_i ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Fvi:=[ki]vi+1assign𝐹subscript𝑣𝑖delimited-[]𝑘𝑖subscript𝑣𝑖1\displaystyle F\cdot v_{i}:=[k-i]v_{i+1}italic_F ⋅ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := [ italic_k - italic_i ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

where v1=vk+1=0subscript𝑣1subscript𝑣𝑘10v_{-1}=v_{k+1}=0italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.

Definition 2.4.

Let k𝑘kitalic_k, l𝑙litalic_l be non-negative integers such that l<k𝑙𝑘l<kitalic_l < italic_k. We define [k]!delimited-[]𝑘[k]![ italic_k ] ! and [kl]matrix𝑘𝑙\begin{bmatrix}k\\ l\end{bmatrix}[ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_l end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] as follows.

[k]!delimited-[]𝑘\displaystyle[k]![ italic_k ] ! :=[k][k1][1]assignabsentdelimited-[]𝑘delimited-[]𝑘1delimited-[]1\displaystyle:=[k][k-1]\cdots[1]:= [ italic_k ] [ italic_k - 1 ] ⋯ [ 1 ]
[kl]matrix𝑘𝑙\displaystyle\begin{bmatrix}k\\ l\end{bmatrix}[ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_l end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] :=[k]![l]![kl]!assignabsentdelimited-[]𝑘delimited-[]𝑙delimited-[]𝑘𝑙\displaystyle:=\frac{[k]!}{[l]![k-l]!}:= divide start_ARG [ italic_k ] ! end_ARG start_ARG [ italic_l ] ! [ italic_k - italic_l ] ! end_ARG
Lemma 2.5.

We have

[k+1j]=qk+j1[kj1]+qj[kj]matrix𝑘1𝑗superscript𝑞𝑘𝑗1matrix𝑘𝑗1superscript𝑞𝑗matrix𝑘𝑗\displaystyle\begin{bmatrix}k+1\\ j\end{bmatrix}=q^{-k+j-1}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j-1\end{bmatrix}+q^{j}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}[ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k + 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] = italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_k + italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j - 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] + italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ]
proof.

It is given by directly computing.

qk+j1[kj1]+qj[kj]superscript𝑞𝑘𝑗1matrix𝑘𝑗1superscript𝑞𝑗matrix𝑘𝑗\displaystyle q^{-k+j-1}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j-1\end{bmatrix}+q^{j}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_k + italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j - 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] + italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] =[k]![j]![k+1j]!(qk+j1[j]+qj[k+1j])absentdelimited-[]𝑘delimited-[]𝑗delimited-[]𝑘1𝑗superscript𝑞𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝑗superscript𝑞𝑗delimited-[]𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle=\frac{[k]!}{[j]![k+1-j]!}(q^{-k+j-1}[j]+q^{j}[k+1-j])= divide start_ARG [ italic_k ] ! end_ARG start_ARG [ italic_j ] ! [ italic_k + 1 - italic_j ] ! end_ARG ( italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_k + italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_j ] + italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_k + 1 - italic_j ] )
=[k]![j]![k+1j]!(qq1)(qk+2j1qk1+qk+1qk+2j1)absentdelimited-[]𝑘delimited-[]𝑗delimited-[]𝑘1𝑗𝑞superscript𝑞1superscript𝑞𝑘2𝑗1superscript𝑞𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑘2𝑗1\displaystyle=\frac{[k]!}{[j]![k+1-j]!(q-q^{-1})}(q^{-k+2j-1}-q^{-k-1}+q^{k+1}% -q^{-k+2j-1})= divide start_ARG [ italic_k ] ! end_ARG start_ARG [ italic_j ] ! [ italic_k + 1 - italic_j ] ! ( italic_q - italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_ARG ( italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_k + 2 italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_k + 2 italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )
=[k+1j]absentmatrix𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle=\begin{bmatrix}k+1\\ j\end{bmatrix}= [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k + 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ]

Definition 2.6.

Let μ𝜇\muitalic_μ be a complex number without non-negative integer. Verma module M(μ)𝑀𝜇M(\mu)italic_M ( italic_μ ) over (q,qμ)𝑞superscript𝑞𝜇\mathbb{C}(q,q^{\mu})blackboard_C ( italic_q , italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) has a basis {v0,v1,}subscript𝑣0subscript𝑣1\{v_{0},v_{1},\cdots\}{ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ } called an induced basis and satisfies the following relations for the generators of Uq(𝔰𝔩2)subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ).

Kvi:=qμ2iviassign𝐾subscript𝑣𝑖superscript𝑞𝜇2𝑖subscript𝑣𝑖\displaystyle K\cdot v_{i}:=q^{\mu-2i}v_{i}italic_K ⋅ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ - 2 italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Evi:=[i]vi1assign𝐸subscript𝑣𝑖delimited-[]𝑖subscript𝑣𝑖1\displaystyle E\cdot v_{i}:=[i]v_{i-1}italic_E ⋅ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := [ italic_i ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Fvi:=[μi]vi+1assign𝐹subscript𝑣𝑖delimited-[]𝜇𝑖subscript𝑣𝑖1\displaystyle F\cdot v_{i}:=[\mu-i]v_{i+1}italic_F ⋅ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := [ italic_μ - italic_i ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

where v1=0subscript𝑣10v_{-1}=0italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.

Definition 2.7.

Given a module M,M𝑀superscript𝑀M,M^{\prime}italic_M , italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT on Uq(𝔰𝔩2)subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), by using the action induced from the coproduct, the tensor product representation MMtensor-product𝑀superscript𝑀M\otimes M^{\prime}italic_M ⊗ italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is defined from the following relations. For all mM𝑚𝑀m\in Mitalic_m ∈ italic_M and mMsuperscript𝑚superscript𝑀m^{\prime}\in M^{\prime}italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, we have

K±1(mm):=(K±1m)(K±1m)assignsuperscript𝐾plus-or-minus1tensor-product𝑚superscript𝑚tensor-productsuperscript𝐾plus-or-minus1𝑚superscript𝐾plus-or-minus1superscript𝑚\displaystyle K^{\pm 1}\cdot(m\otimes m^{\prime}):=(K^{\pm 1}\cdot m)\otimes(K% ^{\pm 1}\cdot m^{\prime})italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⋅ ( italic_m ⊗ italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) := ( italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⋅ italic_m ) ⊗ ( italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⋅ italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )
F(mm):=(Fm)m+(K1m)(Fm)assign𝐹tensor-product𝑚superscript𝑚tensor-product𝐹𝑚superscript𝑚tensor-productsuperscript𝐾1𝑚𝐹superscript𝑚\displaystyle F\cdot(m\otimes m^{\prime}):=(F\cdot m)\otimes m^{\prime}+(K^{-1% }\cdot m)\otimes(F\cdot m^{\prime})italic_F ⋅ ( italic_m ⊗ italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) := ( italic_F ⋅ italic_m ) ⊗ italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⋅ italic_m ) ⊗ ( italic_F ⋅ italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )
E(mm):=(Em)(Km)+m(Em)assign𝐸tensor-product𝑚superscript𝑚tensor-product𝐸𝑚𝐾superscript𝑚tensor-product𝑚𝐸superscript𝑚\displaystyle E\cdot(m\otimes m^{\prime}):=(E\cdot m)\otimes(K\cdot m^{\prime}% )+m\otimes(E\cdot m^{\prime})italic_E ⋅ ( italic_m ⊗ italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) := ( italic_E ⋅ italic_m ) ⊗ ( italic_K ⋅ italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_m ⊗ ( italic_E ⋅ italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )

3 Endomorphism algebras of V1nsuperscriptsubscript𝑉1tensor-productabsent𝑛V_{1}^{\otimes n}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⊗ italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and M(μ1)M(μn)tensor-product𝑀subscript𝜇1𝑀subscript𝜇𝑛M(\mu_{1})\otimes\cdots\otimes M(\mu_{n})italic_M ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ⊗ ⋯ ⊗ italic_M ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )

In this section, we introduce Temperley-Lieb algebra and Temperley-Lieb algebra of type B. Hereinafter, we simply denote vivjMNtensor-productsubscript𝑣𝑖subscript𝑣𝑗tensor-product𝑀𝑁v_{i}\otimes v_{j}\in M\otimes Nitalic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_M ⊗ italic_N by vi,jsubscript𝑣𝑖𝑗v_{i,j}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT where M𝑀Mitalic_M and N𝑁Nitalic_N are M(μ)𝑀𝜇M(\mu)italic_M ( italic_μ ) or Vksubscript𝑉𝑘V_{k}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT respectively.

Definition 3.1.

The intertwining operators cap:(q)V1V1:𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑞tensor-productsubscript𝑉1subscript𝑉1cap:\mathbb{C}(q)\rightarrow V_{1}\otimes V_{1}italic_c italic_a italic_p : blackboard_C ( italic_q ) → italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and cup:V1V1(q):𝑐𝑢𝑝tensor-productsubscript𝑉1subscript𝑉1𝑞cup:V_{1}\otimes V_{1}\rightarrow\mathbb{C}(q)italic_c italic_u italic_p : italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT → blackboard_C ( italic_q ) over Uq𝔰𝔩2subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2U_{q}\mathfrak{sl}_{2}italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are defined as follows.

cap(1)=v0,1q1v1,0𝑐𝑎𝑝1subscript𝑣01superscript𝑞1subscript𝑣10\displaystyle cap(1)=v_{0,1}-q^{-1}v_{1,0}italic_c italic_a italic_p ( 1 ) = italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
cup(v0,0)=cup(v1,1)=0,cup(v0,1)=q,cup(v1,0)=1formulae-sequence𝑐𝑢𝑝subscript𝑣00𝑐𝑢𝑝subscript𝑣110formulae-sequence𝑐𝑢𝑝subscript𝑣01𝑞𝑐𝑢𝑝subscript𝑣101\displaystyle cup(v_{0,0})=cup(v_{1,1})=0,\ cup(v_{0,1})=-q,\ cup(v_{1,0})=1italic_c italic_u italic_p ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = italic_c italic_u italic_p ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = 0 , italic_c italic_u italic_p ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = - italic_q , italic_c italic_u italic_p ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = 1
Definition 3.2.

Temperley Lieb algebra TLn𝑇subscript𝐿𝑛TL_{n}italic_T italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a (q)𝑞\mathbb{C}(q)blackboard_C ( italic_q )-algebra EndUq(𝔰𝔩2)(V1n)subscriptEndsubscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2superscriptsubscript𝑉1tensor-productabsent𝑛\mathrm{End}_{U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})}(V_{1}^{\otimes n})roman_End start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⊗ italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ). The generators of TLn𝑇subscript𝐿𝑛TL_{n}italic_T italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is {ei}subscript𝑒𝑖\{e_{i}\}{ italic_e start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } (i=1,,n1𝑖1𝑛1i=1,\cdots,n-1italic_i = 1 , ⋯ , italic_n - 1) where eisubscript𝑒𝑖e_{i}italic_e start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is defined as follows.

ei=Id(i1)(cupcap)Id(ni1)subscript𝑒𝑖tensor-productsuperscriptIdtensor-productabsent𝑖1𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑐𝑎𝑝superscriptIdtensor-productabsent𝑛𝑖1e_{i}=\mathrm{Id}^{\otimes(i-1)}\otimes(cup\circ cap)\otimes\mathrm{Id}^{% \otimes(n-i-1)}italic_e start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_Id start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⊗ ( italic_i - 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⊗ ( italic_c italic_u italic_p ∘ italic_c italic_a italic_p ) ⊗ roman_Id start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⊗ ( italic_n - italic_i - 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
Definition 3.3.

We let TLμ1,,μn:=EndUq(𝔰𝔩2)(M(μ1)M(μn))assign𝑇subscript𝐿subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑛𝐸𝑛subscript𝑑subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2tensor-product𝑀subscript𝜇1𝑀subscript𝜇𝑛TL_{\mu_{1},\cdots,\mu_{n}}:=End_{U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})}(M(\mu_{1})\otimes% \cdots\otimes M(\mu_{n}))italic_T italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := italic_E italic_n italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_M ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ⊗ ⋯ ⊗ italic_M ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ).

Proposition 3.4.

Let the ground field of Uq(𝔰𝔩2)subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), M(μ)M(λ)tensor-product𝑀𝜇𝑀𝜆M(\mu)\otimes M(\lambda)italic_M ( italic_μ ) ⊗ italic_M ( italic_λ ) and M(μ+λ)𝑀𝜇𝜆M(\mu+\lambda)italic_M ( italic_μ + italic_λ ) be (q,qμ,qλ)𝑞superscript𝑞𝜇superscript𝑞𝜆\mathbb{C}(q,q^{\mu},q^{\lambda})blackboard_C ( italic_q , italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ). Set (q,qμ,qλ)𝑞superscript𝑞𝜇superscript𝑞𝜆\mathbb{C}(q,q^{\mu},q^{\lambda})blackboard_C ( italic_q , italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) linear maps Eμ,λ:M(μ)M(λ)M(μ+λ):subscript𝐸𝜇𝜆tensor-product𝑀𝜇𝑀𝜆𝑀𝜇𝜆E_{\mu,\lambda}:M(\mu)\otimes M(\lambda)\rightarrow M(\mu+\lambda)italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_M ( italic_μ ) ⊗ italic_M ( italic_λ ) → italic_M ( italic_μ + italic_λ ) and Fμ,λ:M(μ+λ)M(μ)M(λ):subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆𝑀𝜇𝜆tensor-product𝑀𝜇𝑀𝜆F_{\mu,\lambda}:M(\mu+\lambda)\rightarrow M(\mu)\otimes M(\lambda)italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_M ( italic_μ + italic_λ ) → italic_M ( italic_μ ) ⊗ italic_M ( italic_λ ) as follows.

Eμ,λ(vi,j)subscript𝐸𝜇𝜆subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗\displaystyle E_{\mu,\lambda}(v_{i,j})italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) :=qi(λj)vi+jassignabsentsuperscript𝑞𝑖𝜆𝑗subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗\displaystyle:=q^{i(\lambda-j)}v_{i+j}:= italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i ( italic_λ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Fμ,λ(vk)subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆subscript𝑣𝑘\displaystyle F_{\mu,\lambda}(v_{k})italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) :=j=0kq(kj)(μj)[kj]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj1[λi]i=0k1[μ+λi]vj,kjassignabsentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘superscript𝑞𝑘𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘𝑗\displaystyle:=\sum_{j=0}^{k}q^{-(k-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-1}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]}v_{j,k-j}:= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

where i=01:=1assignsuperscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖011\prod_{i=0}^{-1}:=1∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT := 1. Then we have Eμ,λHomUq(𝔰𝔩2)(M(μ)M(λ),M(μ+λ))subscript𝐸𝜇𝜆subscriptHomsubscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2tensor-product𝑀𝜇𝑀𝜆𝑀𝜇𝜆E_{\mu,\lambda}\in\mathrm{Hom}_{U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})}(M(\mu)\otimes M(% \lambda),M(\mu+\lambda))italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ roman_Hom start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_M ( italic_μ ) ⊗ italic_M ( italic_λ ) , italic_M ( italic_μ + italic_λ ) ) and Fμ,λHomUq(𝔰𝔩2)(M(μ+λ),M(μ)M(λ))subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆subscriptHomsubscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2𝑀𝜇𝜆tensor-product𝑀𝜇𝑀𝜆F_{\mu,\lambda}\in\mathrm{Hom}_{U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})}(M(\mu+\lambda),M(\mu% )\otimes M(\lambda))italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ roman_Hom start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_M ( italic_μ + italic_λ ) , italic_M ( italic_μ ) ⊗ italic_M ( italic_λ ) ).

proof.

We must show the commutativity XEμ,λ=Eμ,λX𝑋subscript𝐸𝜇𝜆subscript𝐸𝜇𝜆𝑋XE_{\mu,\lambda}=E_{\mu,\lambda}Xitalic_X italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X and XFμ,λ=Fμ,λX𝑋subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆𝑋XF_{\mu,\lambda}=F_{\mu,\lambda}Xitalic_X italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X where X=K,E,F𝑋𝐾𝐸𝐹X=K,E,Fitalic_X = italic_K , italic_E , italic_F. For i,j0𝑖𝑗0i,j\geq 0italic_i , italic_j ≥ 0, the action below is defined as follows.

K,E,F:M(μ)M(λ)M(μ)M(λ):𝐾𝐸𝐹tensor-product𝑀𝜇𝑀𝜆tensor-product𝑀𝜇𝑀𝜆\displaystyle K,E,F:M(\mu)\otimes M(\lambda)\rightarrow M(\mu)\otimes M(\lambda)italic_K , italic_E , italic_F : italic_M ( italic_μ ) ⊗ italic_M ( italic_λ ) → italic_M ( italic_μ ) ⊗ italic_M ( italic_λ )
Kvi,j𝐾subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗\displaystyle Kv_{i,j}italic_K italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =qμ+λ2(i+j)vi,jabsentsuperscript𝑞𝜇𝜆2𝑖𝑗subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗\displaystyle=q^{\mu+\lambda-2(i+j)}v_{i,j}= italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ + italic_λ - 2 ( italic_i + italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Evi,j𝐸subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗\displaystyle Ev_{i,j}italic_E italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =qλ2j[i]vi1,j+[j]vi,j1absentsuperscript𝑞𝜆2𝑗delimited-[]𝑖subscript𝑣𝑖1𝑗delimited-[]𝑗subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗1\displaystyle=q^{\lambda-2j}[i]v_{i-1,j}+[j]v_{i,j-1}= italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ - 2 italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_i ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i - 1 , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + [ italic_j ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Fvi,j𝐹subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗\displaystyle Fv_{i,j}italic_F italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =[μi]vi+1,j+qμ+2i[λj]vi,j+1absentdelimited-[]𝜇𝑖subscript𝑣𝑖1𝑗superscript𝑞𝜇2𝑖delimited-[]𝜆𝑗subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗1\displaystyle=[\mu-i]v_{i+1,j}+q^{-\mu+2i}[\lambda-j]v_{i,j+1}= [ italic_μ - italic_i ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + 1 , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_μ + 2 italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_j ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

First we will show that Eμsubscript𝐸𝜇E_{\mu}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is an intertwining operator over Uq(𝔰𝔩2)subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ). Now we prove the following diagram is commutative.

M(μ)M(λ)tensor-product𝑀𝜇𝑀𝜆\textstyle{M(\mu)\otimes M(\lambda)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces% \ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}italic_M ( italic_μ ) ⊗ italic_M ( italic_λ )Eμ,λsubscript𝐸𝜇𝜆\scriptstyle{E_{\mu,\lambda}}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPTX𝑋\scriptstyle{X}italic_XM(μ+λ)𝑀𝜇𝜆\textstyle{M(\mu+\lambda)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}italic_M ( italic_μ + italic_λ )X𝑋\scriptstyle{X}italic_XM(μ)M(λ)tensor-product𝑀𝜇𝑀𝜆\textstyle{M(\mu)\otimes M(\lambda)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}italic_M ( italic_μ ) ⊗ italic_M ( italic_λ )Eμ,λsubscript𝐸𝜇𝜆\scriptstyle{E_{\mu,\lambda}}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPTM(μ+λ)𝑀𝜇𝜆\textstyle{M(\mu+\lambda)}italic_M ( italic_μ + italic_λ )

Consider the case X=K𝑋𝐾X=Kitalic_X = italic_K, we obtain

KEμ,λvi,j=qμ+λ2(i+j)qi(λj)vi+j𝐾subscript𝐸𝜇𝜆subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗superscript𝑞𝜇𝜆2𝑖𝑗superscript𝑞𝑖𝜆𝑗subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗\displaystyle KE_{\mu,\lambda}v_{i,j}=q^{\mu+\lambda-2(i+j)}q^{i(\lambda-j)}v_% {i+j}italic_K italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ + italic_λ - 2 ( italic_i + italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i ( italic_λ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Eμ,λKvi,j=qi(λj)qμ+λ2(i+j)vi+jsubscript𝐸𝜇𝜆𝐾subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗superscript𝑞𝑖𝜆𝑗superscript𝑞𝜇𝜆2𝑖𝑗subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗\displaystyle E_{\mu,\lambda}Kv_{i,j}=q^{i(\lambda-j)}q^{\mu+\lambda-2(i+j)}v_% {i+j}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i ( italic_λ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ + italic_λ - 2 ( italic_i + italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

Then we have KEμ,λ=Eμ,λK𝐾subscript𝐸𝜇𝜆subscript𝐸𝜇𝜆𝐾KE_{\mu,\lambda}=E_{\mu,\lambda}Kitalic_K italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K. Consider the case X=E𝑋𝐸X=Eitalic_X = italic_E, we obtain

EEμ,λvi,j𝐸subscript𝐸𝜇𝜆subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗\displaystyle EE_{\mu,\lambda}v_{i,j}italic_E italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =[i+j]qi(λj)vi+j1absentdelimited-[]𝑖𝑗superscript𝑞𝑖𝜆𝑗subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗1\displaystyle=[i+j]q^{i(\lambda-j)}v_{i+j-1}= [ italic_i + italic_j ] italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i ( italic_λ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Eμ,λEvi,jsubscript𝐸𝜇𝜆𝐸subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗\displaystyle E_{\mu,\lambda}Ev_{i,j}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =q(i1)(λj)qλ2j[i]vi+j1+qi(λj+1)[j]vi+j1absentsuperscript𝑞𝑖1𝜆𝑗superscript𝑞𝜆2𝑗delimited-[]𝑖subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗1superscript𝑞𝑖𝜆𝑗1delimited-[]𝑗subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗1\displaystyle=q^{(i-1)(\lambda-j)}q^{\lambda-2j}[i]v_{i+j-1}+q^{i(\lambda-j+1)% }[j]v_{i+j-1}= italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i - 1 ) ( italic_λ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ - 2 italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_i ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i ( italic_λ - italic_j + 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_j ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=qi(λj)(qj[i]+qi[j])vi+j1absentsuperscript𝑞𝑖𝜆𝑗superscript𝑞𝑗delimited-[]𝑖superscript𝑞𝑖delimited-[]𝑗subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗1\displaystyle=q^{i(\lambda-j)}(q^{-j}[i]+q^{i}[j])v_{i+j-1}= italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i ( italic_λ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_i ] + italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_j ] ) italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=qi(λj)[i+j]vi+j1absentsuperscript𝑞𝑖𝜆𝑗delimited-[]𝑖𝑗subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗1\displaystyle=q^{i(\lambda-j)}[i+j]v_{i+j-1}= italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i ( italic_λ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_i + italic_j ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

Then we have EEμ,λ=Eμ,λE𝐸subscript𝐸𝜇𝜆subscript𝐸𝜇𝜆𝐸EE_{\mu,\lambda}=E_{\mu,\lambda}Eitalic_E italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E. Consider the case X=F𝑋𝐹X=Fitalic_X = italic_F, we obtain

FEμ,λvi,j𝐹subscript𝐸𝜇𝜆subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗\displaystyle FE_{\mu,\lambda}v_{i,j}italic_F italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =[μ+λij]qi(λj)vi+j+1absentdelimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖𝑗superscript𝑞𝑖𝜆𝑗subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗1\displaystyle=[\mu+\lambda-i-j]q^{i(\lambda-j)}v_{i+j+1}= [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i - italic_j ] italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i ( italic_λ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Eμ,λFvi,jsubscript𝐸𝜇𝜆𝐹subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗\displaystyle E_{\mu,\lambda}Fv_{i,j}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =q(i+1)(λj)[μi]vi+j+1+qi(λj1)qμ+2i[λj]vi+j+1absentsuperscript𝑞𝑖1𝜆𝑗delimited-[]𝜇𝑖subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗1superscript𝑞𝑖𝜆𝑗1superscript𝑞𝜇2𝑖delimited-[]𝜆𝑗subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗1\displaystyle=q^{(i+1)(\lambda-j)}[\mu-i]v_{i+j+1}+q^{i(\lambda-j-1)}q^{-\mu+2% i}[\lambda-j]v_{i+j+1}= italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i + 1 ) ( italic_λ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i ( italic_λ - italic_j - 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_μ + 2 italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_j ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=qi(λj)(qλj[μi]+qμ+i[λj])vi+j+1absentsuperscript𝑞𝑖𝜆𝑗superscript𝑞𝜆𝑗delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscript𝑞𝜇𝑖delimited-[]𝜆𝑗subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗1\displaystyle=q^{i(\lambda-j)}(q^{\lambda-j}[\mu-i]+q^{-\mu+i}[\lambda-j])v_{i% +j+1}= italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i ( italic_λ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] + italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_μ + italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_j ] ) italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=qi(λj)[μ+λij]vi+j+1absentsuperscript𝑞𝑖𝜆𝑗delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖𝑗subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗1\displaystyle=q^{i(\lambda-j)}[\mu+\lambda-i-j]v_{i+j+1}= italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i ( italic_λ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i - italic_j ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

Then we have FEμ,λ=Eμ,λF𝐹subscript𝐸𝜇𝜆subscript𝐸𝜇𝜆𝐹FE_{\mu,\lambda}=E_{\mu,\lambda}Fitalic_F italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F. From the computations above, Eμ,λsubscript𝐸𝜇𝜆E_{\mu,\lambda}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is an intertwining operator over Uq(𝔰𝔩2)subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ). Next we will show that Fμ,λsubscript𝐹𝜇𝜆F_{\mu,\lambda}italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is an intertwining operator over Uq(𝔰𝔩2)subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ). Now we prove the following diagram is commutative.

M(μ+λ)𝑀𝜇𝜆\textstyle{M(\mu+\lambda)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces% \ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}italic_M ( italic_μ + italic_λ )Fμ,λsubscript𝐹𝜇𝜆\scriptstyle{F_{\mu,\lambda}}italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPTX𝑋\scriptstyle{X}italic_XM(μ)M(λ)tensor-product𝑀𝜇𝑀𝜆\textstyle{M(\mu)\otimes M(\lambda)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}italic_M ( italic_μ ) ⊗ italic_M ( italic_λ )X𝑋\scriptstyle{X}italic_XM(μ+λ)𝑀𝜇𝜆\textstyle{M(\mu+\lambda)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}italic_M ( italic_μ + italic_λ )Fμ,λsubscript𝐹𝜇𝜆\scriptstyle{F_{\mu,\lambda}}italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPTM(μ)M(λ)tensor-product𝑀𝜇𝑀𝜆\textstyle{M(\mu)\otimes M(\lambda)}italic_M ( italic_μ ) ⊗ italic_M ( italic_λ )

Consider the case X=K𝑋𝐾X=Kitalic_X = italic_K, we obtain

KFμ,λvk𝐾subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆subscript𝑣𝑘\displaystyle KF_{\mu,\lambda}v_{k}italic_K italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =qμ+λ2kj=0kq(kj)(μj)[kj]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj1[λi]i=0k1[μ+λi]vj,kjabsentsuperscript𝑞𝜇𝜆2𝑘superscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘superscript𝑞𝑘𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘𝑗\displaystyle=q^{\mu+\lambda-2k}\sum_{j=0}^{k}q^{-(k-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}% k\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-1}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]}v_{j,k-j}= italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ + italic_λ - 2 italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Fμ,λKvksubscript𝐹𝜇𝜆𝐾subscript𝑣𝑘\displaystyle F_{\mu,\lambda}Kv_{k}italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =j=0kq(kj)(μj)[kj]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj1[λi]i=0k1[μ+λi]qμ+λ2kvj,kjabsentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘superscript𝑞𝑘𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖superscript𝑞𝜇𝜆2𝑘subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘𝑗\displaystyle=\sum_{j=0}^{k}q^{-(k-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-1}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]}q^{\mu+\lambda-2k}v_{j,k-j}= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ + italic_λ - 2 italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

Then we have KFμ,λ=Fμ,λK𝐾subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆𝐾KF_{\mu,\lambda}=F_{\mu,\lambda}Kitalic_K italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K. Consider the case X=E𝑋𝐸X=Eitalic_X = italic_E. If k=0𝑘0k=0italic_k = 0, EFμ,λvk=Fμ,λEvk𝐸subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆subscript𝑣𝑘subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆𝐸subscript𝑣𝑘EF_{\mu,\lambda}v_{k}=F_{\mu,\lambda}Ev_{k}italic_E italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is trivial. If k0𝑘0k\neq 0italic_k ≠ 0, we obtain

EFμ,λvk=𝐸subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆subscript𝑣𝑘absent\displaystyle EF_{\mu,\lambda}v_{k}=italic_E italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =
j=1kq(kj)(μj)[kj]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj1[λi]i=0k1[μ+λi]qλ2(kj)[j]vj1,kjsuperscriptsubscript𝑗1𝑘superscript𝑞𝑘𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖superscript𝑞𝜆2𝑘𝑗delimited-[]𝑗subscript𝑣𝑗1𝑘𝑗\displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{k}q^{-(k-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-1}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]}q^{\lambda-2(k-j)}[j]v_{j-1,k-j}∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ - 2 ( italic_k - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_j ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j - 1 , italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
+i=0k1q(kj)(μj)[kj]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj1[λi]i=0k1[μ+λi][kj]vj,k1jsuperscriptsubscript𝑖0𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑘𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖delimited-[]𝑘𝑗subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle\qquad+\sum_{i=0}^{k-1}q^{-(k-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-1}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]}[k-j]v_{j,k-1-j}+ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG [ italic_k - italic_j ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k - 1 - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=j=0k1q(k1j)(μj1)[kj+1]i=0j[μi]i=0kj2[λi]i=0k1[μ+λi]qλ2(k1j)[j+1]vj,k1jabsentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑘1𝑗𝜇𝑗1matrix𝑘𝑗1superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗2delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖superscript𝑞𝜆2𝑘1𝑗delimited-[]𝑗1subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle=\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}q^{-(k-1-j)(\mu-j-1)}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j+1\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-2}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]}q^{\lambda-2(k-1-j)}[j+1]v_{j,k-1-j}= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k - 1 - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j - 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j + 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ - 2 ( italic_k - 1 - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_j + 1 ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k - 1 - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
+i=0k1q(k1j)(μj)[k1j]j=0j1[μi]i=0kj2[λi]i=0k2[μ+λi]qμ+j[k][λk+j+1][μ+λk+1]vj,k1jsuperscriptsubscript𝑖0𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑘1𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘1𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑗0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗2delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘2delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖superscript𝑞𝜇𝑗delimited-[]𝑘delimited-[]𝜆𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑘1subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle\qquad+\sum_{i=0}^{k-1}q^{-(k-1-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}k-1\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{j=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-2}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-2}[\mu+\lambda-i]}\frac{q^{-\mu+j}[k][\lambda-k+j+1]}{[\mu+% \lambda-k+1]}v_{j,k-1-j}+ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k - 1 - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_μ + italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_k ] [ italic_λ - italic_k + italic_j + 1 ] end_ARG start_ARG [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_k + 1 ] end_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k - 1 - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=j=0k1q(k1j)(μj)[k1j]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj2[λi]i=0k2[μ+λi]qλk+j+1[k][μj][μ+λk+1]vj,k1jabsentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑘1𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘1𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗2delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘2delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖superscript𝑞𝜆𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝑘delimited-[]𝜇𝑗delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑘1subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle=\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}q^{-(k-1-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}k-1\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-2}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-2}[\mu+\lambda-i]}\frac{q^{\lambda-k+j+1}[k][\mu-j]}{[\mu+% \lambda-k+1]}v_{j,k-1-j}= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k - 1 - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ - italic_k + italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_k ] [ italic_μ - italic_j ] end_ARG start_ARG [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_k + 1 ] end_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k - 1 - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
+j=0k1q(k1j)(μj)[k1j]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj2[λi]i=0k2[μ+λi]qμ+j[k][λk+j+1][μ+λk+1]vj,k1jsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑘1𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘1𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗2delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘2delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖superscript𝑞𝜇𝑗delimited-[]𝑘delimited-[]𝜆𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑘1subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle\qquad+\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}q^{-(k-1-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}k-1\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-2}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-2}[\mu+\lambda-i]}\frac{q^{-\mu+j}[k][\lambda-k+j+1]}{[\mu+% \lambda-k+1]}v_{j,k-1-j}+ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k - 1 - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_μ + italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_k ] [ italic_λ - italic_k + italic_j + 1 ] end_ARG start_ARG [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_k + 1 ] end_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k - 1 - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=[k]j=0k1q(k1j)(μj)[k1j]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj2[λi]i=0k2[μ+λi]absentdelimited-[]𝑘superscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑘1𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘1𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗2delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘2delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖\displaystyle=[k]\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}q^{-(k-1-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}k-1\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-2}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-2}[\mu+\lambda-i]}= [ italic_k ] ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k - 1 - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG
qλk+j+1[μj]+qμ+j[λk+j+1][μ+λk+1]vj,k1jabsentsuperscript𝑞𝜆𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑗superscript𝑞𝜇𝑗delimited-[]𝜆𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑘1subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle\qquad\qquad\cdot\frac{q^{\lambda-k+j+1}[\mu-j]+q^{-\mu+j}[% \lambda-k+j+1]}{[\mu+\lambda-k+1]}v_{j,k-1-j}⋅ divide start_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ - italic_k + italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_j ] + italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_μ + italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_k + italic_j + 1 ] end_ARG start_ARG [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_k + 1 ] end_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k - 1 - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=[k]j=0k1q(k1j)(μj)[k1j]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj2[λi]i=0k2[μ+λi]vj,k1jabsentdelimited-[]𝑘superscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑘1𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘1𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗2delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘2delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle=[k]\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}q^{-(k-1-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}k-1\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-2}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-2}[\mu+\lambda-i]}v_{j,k-1-j}= [ italic_k ] ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k - 1 - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k - 1 - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Fμ,λEvi,j=[k]j=0k1q(k1j)(μj)[k1j]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj2[λi]i=0k2[μ+λi]vj,k1jsubscript𝐹𝜇𝜆𝐸subscript𝑣𝑖𝑗delimited-[]𝑘superscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑘1𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘1𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗2delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘2delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle F_{\mu,\lambda}Ev_{i,j}=[k]\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}q^{-(k-1-j)(\mu-j)}% \begin{bmatrix}k-1\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-2}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-2}[\mu+\lambda-i]}v_{j,k-1-j}italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ italic_k ] ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k - 1 - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k - 1 - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

Then we have EFμ,λ=Fμ,λE𝐸subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆𝐸EF_{\mu,\lambda}=F_{\mu,\lambda}Eitalic_E italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E. Consider the case X=F𝑋𝐹X=Fitalic_X = italic_F, we obtain

FFμ,λvk𝐹subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆subscript𝑣𝑘\displaystyle FF_{\mu,\lambda}v_{k}italic_F italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =j=0kq(kj)(μj)[kj]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj1[λi]i=0k1[μ+λi]Fvj,kjabsentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘superscript𝑞𝑘𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖𝐹subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘𝑗\displaystyle=\sum_{j=0}^{k}q^{-(k-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-1}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]}Fv_{j,k-j}= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG italic_F italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=j=0kq(kj)(μj)[kj]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj1[λi]i=0k1[μ+λi][μj]vj+1,kjabsentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘superscript𝑞𝑘𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖delimited-[]𝜇𝑗subscript𝑣𝑗1𝑘𝑗\displaystyle=\sum_{j=0}^{k}q^{-(k-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-1}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]}[\mu-j]v_{j+1,k-j}= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG [ italic_μ - italic_j ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j + 1 , italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
+j=0kq(kj)(μj)[kj]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj1[λi]i=0k1[μ+λi]qμ+2j[λk+j]vj,k+1jsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘superscript𝑞𝑘𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖superscript𝑞𝜇2𝑗delimited-[]𝜆𝑘𝑗subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle\qquad+\sum_{j=0}^{k}q^{-(k-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-1}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]}q^{-\mu+2j}[\lambda-k+j]v_{j,k+1-j}+ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_μ + 2 italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_k + italic_j ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k + 1 - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=j=1k+1q(k+1j)(μj+1)[kj1]i=0j2[μi]i=0kj[λi]i=0k1[μ+λi][μj+1]vj,k+1jabsentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗1𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑘1𝑗𝜇𝑗1matrix𝑘𝑗1superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗2delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖delimited-[]𝜇𝑗1subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle=\sum_{j=1}^{k+1}q^{-(k+1-j)(\mu-j+1)}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j-1\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-2}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]}[\mu-j+1]v_{j,k+1-j}= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k + 1 - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j + 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j - 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG [ italic_μ - italic_j + 1 ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k + 1 - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
+j=0kq(k+1j)(μj)[kj]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj[λi]i=0k1[μ+λi]qjvj,k+1jsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘superscript𝑞𝑘1𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖superscript𝑞𝑗subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle\qquad+\sum_{j=0}^{k}q^{-(k+1-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]}q^{j}v_{j,k+1-j}+ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k + 1 - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k + 1 - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=j=0k+1q(k+1j)(μj)(qk1+j[kj1]+qj[kj])i=0j1[μi]i=0kj[λi]i=0k1[μ+λi]vj,k+1jabsentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑘1𝑗𝜇𝑗superscript𝑞𝑘1𝑗matrix𝑘𝑗1superscript𝑞𝑗matrix𝑘𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle=\sum_{j=0}^{k+1}q^{-(k+1-j)(\mu-j)}\biggl{(}q^{-k-1+j}\begin{% bmatrix}k\\ j-1\end{bmatrix}+q^{j}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}\biggr{)}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j}[\lambda% -i]}{\prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]}v_{j,k+1-j}= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k + 1 - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_k - 1 + italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j - 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] + italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ) divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k + 1 - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=j=0k+1q(k+1j)(μj)[k+1j]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj[λi]i=0k1[μ+λi]vj,k+1jabsentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑘1𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘1𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle=\sum_{j=0}^{k+1}q^{-(k+1-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}k+1\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]}v_{j,k+1-j}= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k + 1 - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k + 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k + 1 - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
(Lemma2.5)\displaystyle\qquad(\because\mathrm{Lemma}\ \ref{2term})( ∵ roman_Lemma )
Fμ,λFvksubscript𝐹𝜇𝜆𝐹subscript𝑣𝑘\displaystyle F_{\mu,\lambda}Fv_{k}italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =[μ+λk]Fμ,λvk+1absentdelimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑘subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆subscript𝑣𝑘1\displaystyle=[\mu+\lambda-k]F_{\mu,\lambda}v_{k+1}= [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_k ] italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=[μ+λk]j=0k+1q(k+1j)(μj)[k+1j]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj[λi]i=0k[μ+λi]vj,k+1jabsentdelimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑘superscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑘1𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘1𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle=[\mu+\lambda-k]\sum_{j=0}^{k+1}q^{-(k+1-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix% }k+1\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k}[\mu+\lambda-i]}v_{j,k+1-j}= [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_k ] ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k + 1 - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k + 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k + 1 - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=j=0k+1q(k+1j)(μj)[k+1j]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj[λi]i=0k1[μ+λi]vj,k+1jabsentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑘1𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘1𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖subscript𝑣𝑗𝑘1𝑗\displaystyle=\sum_{j=0}^{k+1}q^{-(k+1-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}k+1\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]}v_{j,k+1-j}= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k + 1 - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k + 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_k + 1 - italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

Then we have FFμ,λ=Fμ,λF𝐹subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆𝐹FF_{\mu,\lambda}=F_{\mu,\lambda}Fitalic_F italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F. From the results above, Fμ,λsubscript𝐹𝜇𝜆F_{\mu,\lambda}italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is an intertwining operator. ∎

4 Main Theorem

In this section, we define special idempotents in TLμ1,,μn𝑇subscript𝐿subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑛TL_{\mu_{1},\cdots,\mu_{n}}italic_T italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT like the Jones Wenzl projector in TLn𝑇subscript𝐿𝑛TL_{n}italic_T italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Hereinafter, let the ground field of Uq(𝔰𝔩2)subscript𝑈𝑞𝔰subscript𝔩2U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( fraktur_s fraktur_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) and M(μ1)M(μn)tensor-product𝑀subscript𝜇1𝑀subscript𝜇𝑛M(\mu_{1})\otimes\cdots\otimes M(\mu_{n})italic_M ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ⊗ ⋯ ⊗ italic_M ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) be (q,qμ1,,qμn)𝑞superscript𝑞subscript𝜇1superscript𝑞subscript𝜇𝑛\mathbb{C}(q,q^{\mu_{1}},\cdots,q^{\mu_{n}})blackboard_C ( italic_q , italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ).

Definition 4.1.

Jones Wenzl projector PnTLnsubscript𝑃𝑛𝑇subscript𝐿𝑛P_{n}\in TL_{n}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_T italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is defined as follows.

P1:=Id,Pn:=Pn1+[n1][n]Pn1en1Pn1formulae-sequenceassignsubscript𝑃1Idassignsubscript𝑃𝑛subscript𝑃𝑛1delimited-[]𝑛1delimited-[]𝑛subscript𝑃𝑛1subscript𝑒𝑛1subscript𝑃𝑛1\displaystyle P_{1}:=\mathrm{Id},\quad P_{n}:=P_{n-1}+\frac{[n-1]}{[n]}P_{n-1}% e_{n-1}P_{n-1}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := roman_Id , italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + divide start_ARG [ italic_n - 1 ] end_ARG start_ARG [ italic_n ] end_ARG italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Proposition 4.2.

We have

Pn2superscriptsubscript𝑃𝑛2\displaystyle P_{n}^{2}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =Pnabsentsubscript𝑃𝑛\displaystyle=P_{n}= italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
proof.

See Proposition 2 in [KauffmanLins]. ∎

Definition 4.3.

Put Eμ,λ;μ1,,μi:=Eμ,λIdμ1Idμiassignsubscript𝐸𝜇𝜆subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑖tensor-productsubscript𝐸𝜇𝜆subscriptIdsubscript𝜇1subscriptIdsubscript𝜇𝑖E_{\mu,\lambda;\mu_{1},\cdots,\mu_{i}}:=E_{\mu,\lambda}\otimes\mathrm{Id}_{\mu% _{1}}\otimes\cdots\otimes\mathrm{Id}_{\mu_{i}}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ ; italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Id start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ ⋯ ⊗ roman_Id start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Fμ,λ;μ1,,μi:=Fμ,λIdμ1Idμiassignsubscript𝐹𝜇𝜆subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑖tensor-productsubscript𝐹𝜇𝜆subscriptIdsubscript𝜇1subscriptIdsubscript𝜇𝑖F_{\mu,\lambda;\mu_{1},\cdots,\mu_{i}}:=F_{\mu,\lambda}\otimes\mathrm{Id}_{\mu% _{1}}\otimes\cdots\otimes\mathrm{Id}_{\mu_{i}}italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ ; italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Id start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ ⋯ ⊗ roman_Id start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. By induction on n>2𝑛2n>2italic_n > 2, extended Jones Wenzl projectors Pμ1,,μnTLμ1,,μnsubscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑛𝑇subscript𝐿subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑛P_{\mu_{1},\cdots,\mu_{n}}\in TL_{\mu_{1},\cdots,\mu_{n}}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_T italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are defined as follows.

Pμ1,μ2:=Fμ1,μ2Eμ1,μ2,Pμ1,,μn:=Fμ1,μ2;μ3,,μnPμ1+μ2,μ3,,μnEμ1,μ2;μ3,,μnformulae-sequenceassignsubscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2subscript𝐹subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2subscript𝐸subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2assignsubscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑛subscript𝐹subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2subscript𝜇3subscript𝜇𝑛subscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2subscript𝜇3subscript𝜇𝑛subscript𝐸subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2subscript𝜇3subscript𝜇𝑛\displaystyle P_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}}:=F_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}}E_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}},% \quad P_{\mu_{1},\cdots,\mu_{n}}:=F_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2};\mu_{3},\cdots,\mu_{n}}P_% {\mu_{1}+\mu_{2},\mu_{3},\cdots,\mu_{n}}E_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2};\mu_{3},\cdots,\mu_% {n}}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Remark 4.4.

The definition above is inspired by Definition 2.11 in [RoseTubbenhauer]. By Corollary 2.13 in [RoseTubbenhauer], the Jones Wenzl projectors defined in [RoseTubbenhauer] coincide with Pnsubscript𝑃𝑛P_{n}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Lemma 4.5.

We have

Eμ,λFμ,λ=Idμ+λsubscript𝐸𝜇𝜆subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆subscriptId𝜇𝜆E_{\mu,\lambda}F_{\mu,\lambda}=\mathrm{Id}_{\mu+\lambda}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_Id start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ + italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
proof.

Let k𝑘kitalic_k be a non-negative integer. Then we have

Eμ,λFμ,λvksubscript𝐸𝜇𝜆subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆subscript𝑣𝑘\displaystyle E_{\mu,\lambda}F_{\mu,\lambda}v_{k}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =j=0kq(kj)(μj)[kj]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj1[λi]i=0k1[μ+λi]qj(λk+j)vkabsentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘superscript𝑞𝑘𝑗𝜇𝑗matrix𝑘𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖superscript𝑞𝑗𝜆𝑘𝑗subscript𝑣𝑘\displaystyle=\sum_{j=0}^{k}q^{-(k-j)(\mu-j)}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-1}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]}q^{j(\lambda-k+j)}v_{k}= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_k - italic_j ) ( italic_μ - italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j ( italic_λ - italic_k + italic_j ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=j=0kqj(μ+λ)kμ[kj]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj1[λi]i=0k1[μ+λi]vkabsentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘superscript𝑞𝑗𝜇𝜆𝑘𝜇matrix𝑘𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖subscript𝑣𝑘\displaystyle=\sum_{j=0}^{k}q^{j(\mu+\lambda)-k\mu}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}\frac{\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-1}[\lambda-i]}{% \prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]}v_{k}= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j ( italic_μ + italic_λ ) - italic_k italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] divide start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG start_ARG ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] end_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

Now we prove Eμ,λFμ,λvk=vksubscript𝐸𝜇𝜆subscript𝐹𝜇𝜆subscript𝑣𝑘subscript𝑣𝑘E_{\mu,\lambda}F_{\mu,\lambda}v_{k}=v_{k}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ , italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT by induction on k𝑘kitalic_k. If k=0𝑘0k=0italic_k = 0, it is trivial by the above. By the above calculation, it suffices to show that

i=0k[μ+λi]=j=0k+1qj(μ+λ)(k+1)μ[k+1j]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj[λi]superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖superscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑗𝜇𝜆𝑘1𝜇matrix𝑘1𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗delimited-[]𝜆𝑖\displaystyle\prod_{i=0}^{k}[\mu+\lambda-i]=\sum_{j=0}^{k+1}q^{j(\mu+\lambda)-% (k+1)\mu}\begin{bmatrix}k+1\\ j\end{bmatrix}\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j}[\lambda-i]∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j ( italic_μ + italic_λ ) - ( italic_k + 1 ) italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k + 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ]

By induction, we obtain

i=0k[μ+λi]superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖\displaystyle\prod_{i=0}^{k}[\mu+\lambda-i]∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ] =[μ+λk]i=0k1[μ+λi]absentdelimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑘superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘1delimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑖\displaystyle=[\mu+\lambda-k]\prod_{i=0}^{k-1}[\mu+\lambda-i]= [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_k ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_i ]
=[μ+λk]j=0kqj(μ+λ)kμ[kj]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj1[λi]absentdelimited-[]𝜇𝜆𝑘superscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘superscript𝑞𝑗𝜇𝜆𝑘𝜇matrix𝑘𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝜆𝑖\displaystyle=[\mu+\lambda-k]\sum_{j=0}^{k}q^{j(\mu+\lambda)-k\mu}\begin{% bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-1}[\lambda-i]= [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_k ] ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j ( italic_μ + italic_λ ) - italic_k italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ]
(byinduction)\displaystyle\qquad(\because\mathrm{by}\ \mathrm{induction})( ∵ roman_by roman_induction )
=j=0kqj(μ+λ)kμ[kj]qλk+ji=0j[μi]i=0kj1[λi]absentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘superscript𝑞𝑗𝜇𝜆𝑘𝜇matrix𝑘𝑗superscript𝑞𝜆𝑘𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗1delimited-[]𝜆𝑖\displaystyle=\sum_{j=0}^{k}q^{j(\mu+\lambda)-k\mu}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}q^{\lambda-k+j}\prod_{i=0}^{j}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j-1}[\lambda% -i]= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j ( italic_μ + italic_λ ) - italic_k italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ - italic_k + italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ]
+j=0kqj(μ+λ)kμ[kj]qμ+ji=0j1[μi]i=0kj[λi]superscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘superscript𝑞𝑗𝜇𝜆𝑘𝜇matrix𝑘𝑗superscript𝑞𝜇𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗delimited-[]𝜆𝑖\displaystyle\qquad+\sum_{j=0}^{k}q^{j(\mu+\lambda)-k\mu}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}q^{-\mu+j}\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j}[\lambda-i]+ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j ( italic_μ + italic_λ ) - italic_k italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_μ + italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ]
([μ+λk]=qλk+j[μj]+qμ+j[λk+j])\displaystyle\qquad(\because[\mu+\lambda-k]=q^{\lambda-k+j}[\mu-j]+q^{-\mu+j}[% \lambda-k+j])( ∵ [ italic_μ + italic_λ - italic_k ] = italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ - italic_k + italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_j ] + italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_μ + italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_k + italic_j ] )
=j=1k+1qj(μ+λ)(k+1)μi=0j1[μi]i=0kj[λi]qk+j1[kj1]absentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗1𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑗𝜇𝜆𝑘1𝜇superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscript𝑞𝑘𝑗1matrix𝑘𝑗1\displaystyle=\sum_{j=1}^{k+1}q^{j(\mu+\lambda)-(k+1)\mu}\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu% -i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j}[\lambda-i]q^{-k+j-1}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j-1\end{bmatrix}= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j ( italic_μ + italic_λ ) - ( italic_k + 1 ) italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_k + italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j - 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ]
+j=0kqj(μ+λ)(k+1)μi=0j1[μi]i=0kj[λi]qj[kj]superscriptsubscript𝑗0𝑘superscript𝑞𝑗𝜇𝜆𝑘1𝜇superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗delimited-[]𝜆𝑖superscript𝑞𝑗matrix𝑘𝑗\displaystyle\qquad+\sum_{j=0}^{k}q^{j(\mu+\lambda)-(k+1)\mu}\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}% [\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j}[\lambda-i]q^{j}\begin{bmatrix}k\\ j\end{bmatrix}+ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j ( italic_μ + italic_λ ) - ( italic_k + 1 ) italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ] italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ]
=j=1k+1qj(μ+λ)(k+1)μ[k+1j]i=0j1[μi]i=0kj[λi]absentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗1𝑘1superscript𝑞𝑗𝜇𝜆𝑘1𝜇matrix𝑘1𝑗superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑗1delimited-[]𝜇𝑖superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖0𝑘𝑗delimited-[]𝜆𝑖\displaystyle=\sum_{j=1}^{k+1}q^{j(\mu+\lambda)-(k+1)\mu}\begin{bmatrix}k+1\\ j\end{bmatrix}\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}[\mu-i]\prod_{i=0}^{k-j}[\lambda-i]= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j ( italic_μ + italic_λ ) - ( italic_k + 1 ) italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k + 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_μ - italic_i ] ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_λ - italic_i ]
(Lemma2.5)\displaystyle\qquad(\because\mathrm{Lemma}\ \ref{2term})( ∵ roman_Lemma )

Then the result follows. ∎

Theorem 4.6.

Extended Jones Wenzl projectors Pμ1,,μnTLμ1,,μnsubscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑛𝑇subscript𝐿subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑛P_{\mu_{1},\ldots,\mu_{n}}\in TL_{\mu_{1},\ldots,\mu_{n}}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_T italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT satisfy the following conditions.

Pμ1,,μn2=Pμ1,,μnsuperscriptsubscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑛2subscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑛\displaystyle P_{\mu_{1},\ldots,\mu_{n}}^{2}=P_{\mu_{1},\ldots,\mu_{n}}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
proof.

We prove it by induction on n>2𝑛2n>2italic_n > 2. If n=2𝑛2n=2italic_n = 2, from Lemma 4.5, we have

Pμ1,μ22superscriptsubscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇22\displaystyle P_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}}^{2}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =Fμ1,μ2Eμ1,μ2Fμ1,μ2Eμ1,μ2absentsubscript𝐹subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2subscript𝐸subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2subscript𝐹subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2subscript𝐸subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2\displaystyle=F_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}}E_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}}F_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}}E_{\mu_% {1},\mu_{2}}= italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=Fμ1,μ2Eμ1,μ2absentsubscript𝐹subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2subscript𝐸subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2\displaystyle=F_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}}E_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}}= italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

Then we obtain Pμ1,μ22=Pμ1,μ2superscriptsubscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇22subscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2P_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}}^{2}=P_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Suppose that Pμ1,,μn12=Pμ1,,μn1superscriptsubscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑛12subscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑛1P_{\mu_{1},\ldots,\mu_{n-1}}^{2}=P_{\mu_{1},\ldots,\mu_{n-1}}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Then we have

Pμ1,,μn2superscriptsubscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑛2\displaystyle P_{\mu_{1},\ldots,\mu_{n}}^{2}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =Fμ1,μ2;μ3,,μnPμ1+μ2,μ3,,μnEμ1,μ2;μ3,,μnFμ1,μ2;μ3,,μnPμ1+μ2,μ3,,μnEμ1,μ2;μ3,,μnabsentsubscript𝐹subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2subscript𝜇3subscript𝜇𝑛subscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2subscript𝜇3subscript𝜇𝑛subscript𝐸subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2subscript𝜇3subscript𝜇𝑛subscript𝐹subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2subscript𝜇3subscript𝜇𝑛subscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2subscript𝜇3subscript𝜇𝑛subscript𝐸subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇2subscript𝜇3subscript𝜇𝑛\displaystyle=F_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2};\mu_{3},\cdots,\mu_{n}}P_{\mu_{1}+\mu_{2},\mu% _{3},\cdots,\mu_{n}}E_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2};\mu_{3},\cdots,\mu_{n}}F_{\mu_{1},\mu_{% 2};\mu_{3},\cdots,\mu_{n}}P_{\mu_{1}+\mu_{2},\mu_{3},\cdots,\mu_{n}}E_{\mu_{1}% ,\mu_{2};\mu_{3},\cdots,\mu_{n}}= italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=Fμ1,μ2;μ3,,μnPμ1+μ2,μ3,,μn2Eμ1,μ2;μ3,,μn(Lemma4.5)\displaystyle=F_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2};\mu_{3},\cdots,\mu_{n}}P_{\mu_{1}+\mu_{2},\mu% _{3},\cdots,\mu_{n}}^{2}E_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2};\mu_{3},\cdots,\mu_{n}}\quad(% \because\mathrm{Lemma}\ \ref{EF=[mu+1]})= italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ∵ roman_Lemma )
=Fμ1,μ2;μ3,,μnPμ1+μ2,μ3,,μnEμ1,μ2;μ3,,μn(Byinduction)\displaystyle=F_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2};\mu_{3},\cdots,\mu_{n}}P_{\mu_{1}+\mu_{2},\mu% _{3},\cdots,\mu_{n}}E_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2};\mu_{3},\cdots,\mu_{n}}\quad(\because% \mathrm{By}\ \mathrm{induction})= italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ∵ roman_By roman_induction )
=Pμ1,,μnabsentsubscript𝑃subscript𝜇1subscript𝜇𝑛\displaystyle=P_{\mu_{1},\cdots,\mu_{n}}= italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⋯ , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

Thus the result follows. ∎

References

DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, TOHOKU UNIVERSITY, 6-3, AOBA, ARAMAKI-AZA, AOBA-KU, SENDAI, 980-8578, JAPAN

Email Address: matsumoto.ryoga.t2@dc.tohoku.ac.jp