Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

HTML conversions sometimes display errors due to content that did not convert correctly from the source. This paper uses the following packages that are not yet supported by the HTML conversion tool. Feedback on these issues are not necessary; they are known and are being worked on.

  • failed: mhchem

Authors: achieve the best HTML results from your LaTeX submissions by following these best practices.

License: arXiv.org perpetual non-exclusive license
arXiv:2402.15219v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 23 Feb 2024

Global Rotation of Skyrmion Bags under Vertical Microwave Fields

Lan Bo Department of Applied Physics, Waseda University, Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan Key Laboratory for Anisotropy and Texture of Materials (MOE), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China    Rongzhi Zhao zhaorz@hdu.edu.cn Institute of Advanced Magnetic Materials, College of Materials and Environmental Engineering, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310012, China    Xichao Zhang Department of Applied Physics, Waseda University, Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan    Masahito Mochizuki masa_mochizuki@waseda.jp Department of Applied Physics, Waseda University, Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan    Xuefeng Zhang Key Laboratory for Anisotropy and Texture of Materials (MOE), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China Institute of Advanced Magnetic Materials, College of Materials and Environmental Engineering, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310012, China
(February 23, 2024)
Abstract

Magnetic skyrmion bags are composite topological spin textures with arbitrary topological charges. Here, we computationally study the transient rotational motion of skyrmion bags, which is characterized by a global rotation of the inner skyrmions around the central point. Distinct from conventional rotational modes found in skyrmions, the observed rotation is a forced motion associated with the breathing mode induced solely by vertical microwave fields. The driving force behind this rotation originates from the interactions between outer and inner skyrmions, with the angular velocity determined by the phase difference resulting from their asynchronous breathing behaviors. It is also found that skyrmion bags with larger skyrmion numbers are more conducive to the occurrence of the rotation. Our results are useful for understanding the cluster dynamics of complex topological spin textures driven by dynamic fields.

I Introduction

Magnetic skyrmions are topologically nontrivial spin textures and have garnered substantial attention and interest in various of fields ranging from fundamental physics to materials science.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] Notably, recent advances in the exploration of localized spin configurations lead to the expansion of the skyrmion family. [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15] For example, elementary particle-like skyrmions may be assembled together to form composite structures known as skyrmion bags,[16] which consist of an outer skyrmion boundary (i.e., a circular domain wall) enveloping multiple smaller nested skyrmions. Skyrmion bags were initially proposed in 2019,[16, 17] and have since been experimentally detected in diverse materials, such as B20-type chiral magnets [18] and van der Waals magnets.[19] They have also been verified as transition states in the transformation processes involving skyrmions and skyrmioniums,[20] as well as in the generation of skyrmion-antiskyrmion pairs.[21] The arbitrary topological charges endow skyrmion bags with the potential to enable high-density and multi-data information encoding,[16, 17] thereby attracting extensive theoretical investigations, including their existence and stability,[22] controllable creation,[23] and dynamics driven by spin-orbit torques,[24] spin-transfer torques,[25] anisotropy gradient,[26] and voltage gates.[27, 28] Moreover, skyrmion bags could also serve as compelling evidence to physically explicate the particle-continuum duality [29] and extraordinary diversity [30] of the skyrmion solutions. Therefore, the study of skyrmion bags is of academic significance and may lead to practical applications. The spin excitation of topological spin textures under microwave fields is an important issue in the control and manipulation of their dynamics. Dynamic responses in both skyrmion crystals [31, 32] and individual skyrmion [33, 34] have been investigated, where three eigenmodes have been identified. Specifically, these modes include a breathing mode under out-of-plane microwave fields, as well as clockwise and anticlockwise rotational modes under in-plane microwave fields.[31, 32, 33, 34] These resonance effects suggest an opportunity for the design and development of skyrmion-based microwave applications including microwave detectors [35, 36] and nano-oscillators.[37, 38] Furthermore, subsequent works have extended to other skyrmionic textures, such as antiskyrmion,[39, 40] skyrmionium,[41] bimeron,[42] and hopfion,[43, 44] whose individual spin eigenmodes can serve as unique fingerprints to enable their differentiation.[45] The spin excitation of skyrmion bags under out-of-plane [46] and in-plane microwave fields [47] have been explored very recently, with various oscillation modes identified. These works involved skyrmion bags with small skyrmion numbers and high central symmetry, constrained within a nanodisk. In this paper, we find that a global rotation of the skyrmion bags can be driven by a microwave field, where skyrmion bags with notably large skyrmion number is considered in an open boundary framework. The initial skyrmion bags inherently adopt a hexagonal spatial arrangement similar to the skyrmion crystals.[48] Different from the conventional skyrmion rotational modes induced by in-plane microwave fields [31, 32, 33, 34], the observed transient rotation is believed to be a forced motion affiliated to the high-frequency response mode purely triggered by vertical microwave fields.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) Schematic of the micromagnetic model: a 2D magnetic film comprising a grid of 250×250250250250\times 250250 × 250 sites. The initial skyrmion bag consists of an outer skyrmion and nineteen inner skyrmions with opposite polarity. Regions 1 and 2 are squared areas each spanning dimensions of 30×30303030\times 3030 × 30 sites, located at the central or along the border areas of the skyrmion bags, respectively. A uniform external field Hzsubscript𝐻𝑧-H_{z}- italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is applied across the entire space. Microwave magnetic fields with sinc-function and sin-function profiles are shown as insets. The color bar of magnetization component mzsubscript𝑚𝑧m_{z}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is also applicable to all subsequent spin configurations. (b) Imaginary part of the susceptibility spectrum obtained after applying a sinc-function field. Two resonance peaks under Hz=0subscript𝐻𝑧0H_{z}=0italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 are located at fI=1.4GHzsubscript𝑓I1.4GHzf_{\rm I}=1.4\ \rm GHzitalic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.4 roman_GHz and fII=8.7subscript𝑓II8.7f_{\rm II}=8.7italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_II end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 8.7. Insets: schematic illustrations of the dynamic changes for the two spin excitation modes. (c) (d) The spatial FFT amplitude distributions of the z-component magnetization mzsubscript𝑚𝑧m_{z}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The color bar indicates the intensity of the oscillation amplitude.

II Model and methodology

As illustrated schematically in Fig. 1 (a), the model considered in this work is a two-dimensional (2D) square lattice consisting of N=250×250𝑁250250N=250\times 250italic_N = 250 × 250 sites, designed to simulate a magnetic thin film. A skyrmion bag with skyrmion number |Q|=18𝑄18\left|Q\right|=18| italic_Q | = 18 is set as the initial spin configuration after full relaxation.[23] Here, the skyrmion number is defined as [1]

Q=14π𝐦(x𝐦×y𝐦)dxdy,𝑄14𝜋𝐦subscript𝑥𝐦subscript𝑦𝐦differential-d𝑥differential-d𝑦\displaystyle{Q}=\frac{1}{4\pi}\int{\bf m}\cdot(\partial_{x}{\bf m}\times% \partial_{y}{\bf m})\,{\rm d}x\,{\rm d}y,italic_Q = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG ∫ bold_m ⋅ ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_m × ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_m ) roman_d italic_x roman_d italic_y , (1)

where 𝐦𝐦{\bf m}bold_m is the normalized magnetization vector, and n=|Q|+1𝑛𝑄1n=\left|Q\right|+1italic_n = | italic_Q | + 1 is the actual number of the inner skyrmions because that the outer skyrmion carries Q=1𝑄1Q=1italic_Q = 1. The diameter of the outer skyrmion is around 180 sites, which avoids the potential influence of finite geometric constraints. The average energy density of this system is given by

ϵ=A(𝐦)2+D[mz(𝐦)(𝐦)mz]italic-ϵ𝐴superscript𝐦2𝐷delimited-[]subscript𝑚𝑧𝐦𝐦subscript𝑚𝑧\displaystyle\epsilon=A(\nabla{\bf m})^{2}+D\left[m_{z}(\nabla\cdot{\bf m})-({% \bf m}\cdot\nabla)m_{z}\right]italic_ϵ = italic_A ( ∇ bold_m ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_D [ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ∇ ⋅ bold_m ) - ( bold_m ⋅ ∇ ) italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ]
K(𝐧𝐦)2μ0MsmzHz12μ0Ms𝐦𝐇dm,𝐾superscript𝐧𝐦2subscript𝜇0subscript𝑀ssubscript𝑚𝑧subscript𝐻𝑧12subscript𝜇0subscript𝑀s𝐦subscript𝐇dm\displaystyle\ \ -K({\bf n}\cdot{\bf m})^{2}-\mu_{0}M_{\rm s}m_{z}H_{z}-\frac{% 1}{2}\mu_{0}M_{\rm s}{\bf m}\cdot{\bf H}_{\rm dm},- italic_K ( bold_n ⋅ bold_m ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_m ⋅ bold_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_dm end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (2)

where A𝐴Aitalic_A, D𝐷Ditalic_D, and K𝐾Kitalic_K are the Heisenberg exchange, interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI), and perpendicular anisotropy constants, respectively. The vector 𝐧𝐧{\bf n}bold_n is the unit surface normal vector, μ0subscript𝜇0\mu_{0}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the vacuum permeability, Mssubscript𝑀sM_{\rm s}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the saturation magnetization, Hzsubscript𝐻𝑧H_{z}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the strength of the static applied magnetic field along the z𝑧-z- italic_z direction, and 𝐇dmsubscript𝐇dm{\bf H}_{\rm{dm}}bold_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_dm end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the demagnetizing field. To describe the dynamic behaviors of the skyrmion bags, we employ the finite-difference micromagnetic solver MUMAX3,[49] for the integration of the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation

t𝐦=γ0𝐦×𝐡eff+α(𝐦×t𝐦),subscript𝑡𝐦subscript𝛾0𝐦subscript𝐡eff𝛼𝐦subscript𝑡𝐦\displaystyle{\partial_{t}{\bf m}}=-\gamma_{0}{\bf m}\times{\bf h}_{\rm eff}+% \alpha({\bf m}\times\partial_{t}{\bf m}),∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_m = - italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_m × bold_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_α ( bold_m × ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_m ) , (3)

where γ0subscript𝛾0\gamma_{0}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the absolute gyromagnetic ratio, α𝛼\alphaitalic_α is the Gilbert damping constant, and 𝐡eff=(δϵ/δ𝐦)/(μ0Ms)subscript𝐡eff𝛿italic-ϵ𝛿𝐦subscript𝜇0subscript𝑀s{\bf h}_{\rm eff}=-(\delta\epsilon/\delta{\bf m})/(\mu_{0}M_{\rm s})bold_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - ( italic_δ italic_ϵ / italic_δ bold_m ) / ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) is the effective field. The key input parameters are derived from Co/Pt films in real experiments [50, 51] and some previous theoretical works:[22, 23, 24] Ms=5.8×105A/msubscript𝑀s5.8superscript105AmM_{\rm s}=5.8\times 10^{5}\,\rm{A}/\rm{m}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5.8 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_A / roman_m, A=1.5×1011J/m𝐴1.5superscript1011JmA=1.5\times 10^{-11}\ \rm{J}/\rm{m}italic_A = 1.5 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_J / roman_m, D=3.5×103J/m2𝐷3.5superscript103Jsuperscriptm2D=3.5\times 10^{-3}\ \rm{J}/\rm{m}^{2}italic_D = 3.5 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_J / roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, K=8.0×105J/m3𝐾8.0superscript105Jsuperscriptm3K=8.0\times 10^{5}\ \rm{J}/\rm{m}^{3}italic_K = 8.0 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_J / roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and α=0.010.05𝛼0.010.05\alpha=0.01-0.05italic_α = 0.01 - 0.05 depending on various situations.

III Results and discussion

Our investigation starts by identifying the spin excitation modes of the skyrmion bags under vertical microwave fields. We apply an alternating current (AC) magnetic field 𝐇f*=[ 0, 0,H0*sin(2πft)/(2πft)]superscriptsubscript𝐇𝑓 0 0superscriptsubscript𝐻0sin2𝜋𝑓𝑡2𝜋𝑓𝑡{\bf H}_{f}^{*}=[\,0,\,0,\,H_{\rm 0}^{*}{\rm sin}(2\pi ft)/(2\pi ft)]bold_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [ 0 , 0 , italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_sin ( 2 italic_π italic_f italic_t ) / ( 2 italic_π italic_f italic_t ) ], with the amplitude H0*=1mTsuperscriptsubscript𝐻01mTH_{\rm 0}^{*}=1\ \rm mTitalic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1 roman_mT and the cutoff frequency f=50GHz𝑓50GHzf=50\ \rm GHzitalic_f = 50 roman_GHz, and its profile can be found in the inset of Fig. 1 (a). The spin excitation spectra under different Hzsubscript𝐻𝑧H_{z}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are given in Fig. 1 (b), where the imaginary part of the dynamical susceptibility, ImχzImsubscript𝜒𝑧\rm Im\chi_{\it z}roman_Im italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, is calculated from the fast Fourier transformation (FFT) of magnetization component mz(t)=(1/N)Σi=1Nmz,i(t)subscript𝑚𝑧𝑡1𝑁superscriptsubscriptΣ𝑖1𝑁subscript𝑚𝑧𝑖𝑡m_{z}(t)=(1/N)\ \Sigma_{i=1}^{N}m_{z,i}(t)italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) = ( 1 / italic_N ) roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z , italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ). Note that we present only the range within 20 GHz since there are no apparent resonance peaks observed beyond this range. Two notable resonance peaks have been identified, and these peaks exhibit a shift towards higher frequency intervals with the increase of Hzsubscript𝐻𝑧H_{z}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, while simultaneously weakening in strength. To further trace the spin dynamics of each mode, we consider the case where Hz=0subscript𝐻𝑧0H_{z}=0italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and apply sin-function AC fields 𝐇f=[ 0, 0,H0sin(2πfit)]subscript𝐇𝑓 0 0subscript𝐻0sin2𝜋subscript𝑓𝑖𝑡{\bf H}_{f}=\left[\,0,\,0,\,H_{\rm 0}{\rm sin}(2\pi f_{i}\,t)\right]bold_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ 0 , 0 , italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_sin ( 2 italic_π italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ) ], with the amplitude H0=15mTsubscript𝐻015mTH_{\rm 0}=15\ \rm mTitalic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 15 roman_mT and two eigenfrequencies fI=1.4GHzsubscript𝑓I1.4GHzf_{\rm I}=1.4\ \rm GHzitalic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.4 roman_GHz, fII=8.7GHzsubscript𝑓II8.7GHzf_{\rm II}=8.7\ \rm GHzitalic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_II end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 8.7 roman_GHz. The profile of such microwave fields is also shown in the inset of Fig. 1 (a). Figures 1 (c) (d) depict the amplitude distributions of the oscillation obtained through FFT for each spatial point. It is revealed that mode I primarily corresponds to the breathing mode of the outer skyrmion, whereas mode II is mainly the breathing mode of the inner skyrmions, accompanied by a collective rotational motion. The corresponding schematic illustrations of the spin dynamics for each mode are also shown at the side in Fig. 1 (c) (d). Interestingly, in previous studies concerning skyrmion excitations,[31, 32, 33] there have been no instances where a vertical magnetic field induced a rotational mode. So our following investigation will focus on characterizing and analyzing this rotational motion.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Selected snapshots of dynamic spin textures for a microwave-irradiated skyrmion bag with rotating inner skyrmions at (a) t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 ns, and (b) t=45𝑡45t=45italic_t = 45 ns. The rotational direction is indicated by white arrows. The schematic of Magnus force is indicated by yellow arrows. θisubscript𝜃𝑖\theta_{i}italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the rotation angle of an inner skyrmion. (c) Time profiles of the rotation angle ΘΘ\varThetaroman_Θ for various Hzsubscript𝐻𝑧H_{z}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Inset: Variation of the maximum value of the rotation angle ΘmaxsubscriptΘ𝑚𝑎𝑥\varTheta_{max}roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_a italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT versus Hzsubscript𝐻𝑧H_{z}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Variations of the z𝑧zitalic_z-component magnetizations in Region 1 and 2, mz1subscript𝑚𝑧1m_{z1}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and mz2subscript𝑚𝑧2m_{z2}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, plotted as a function of time within 0.5 ns, for three distinct intervals: (a) Initial stage spanning from 0.5 ns to 1.0 ns; (b) Intermediate stage spanning from 10.0 ns to 10.5 ns; (c) Stable stage spanning from 59.5 ns to 60.0 ns. ΔΦΔΦ\Delta\varPhiroman_Δ roman_Φ represents the phase difference between mz1(t)subscript𝑚𝑧1𝑡m_{z1}(t)italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) and mz2(t)subscript𝑚𝑧2𝑡m_{z2}(t)italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ). (d) Time-dependent variations of the angular velocity ω𝜔\omegaitalic_ω (black curve) and the phase difference ΔΦΔΦ\Delta\varPhiroman_Δ roman_Φ (red data points). (e) Variation of the outer skyrmion diameter d𝑑ditalic_d versus time. The black line with markers represents the simulated results, while the red dashed line corresponds to the fitted curve.

Now we undertake the characterization of the rotational dynamics of the skyrmion bags. Figure 2 (a) (b) present the snapshots of the dynamic spin configurations throughout the rotation process under Hz=0subscript𝐻𝑧0H_{z}=0italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0. It is evident that the inner skyrmions collectively engage in an anticlockwise rotation around the central point. We trace a marked inner skyrmion as an example, which, at a given moment t𝑡titalic_t, will rotate by an angle denoted as θi(t)subscript𝜃𝑖𝑡\theta_{i}(t)italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ), from its initial position. Here, i𝑖iitalic_i is the index of inner skyrmions. As shown in the inset of Fig. 2 (a), because the shape of inner skyrmions remain unchanged, the direction of rotation can be determined by the Thiele framwork [52] 𝐆×𝐯𝐅similar-to𝐆𝐯𝐅{\bf G}\times{\bf v}\sim{\bf F}bold_G × bold_v ∼ bold_F, where 𝐆=(0,0,4πQ)𝐆004𝜋𝑄{{\bf G}=(0,0,4\pi Q)}bold_G = ( 0 , 0 , 4 italic_π italic_Q ) is the gyromagnetic coupling vector, 𝐯𝐯{\bf v}bold_v is the skyrmion velocity, and 𝐅𝐅{\bf F}bold_F is the interaction force from the outer skyrmion boundary. This equation indicates that the moving direction of skyrmion (𝐯𝐅×𝐆)(\parallel{\bf v}\propto{\bf F}\times{\bf G})( ∥ bold_v ∝ bold_F × bold_G ) is perpendicular to 𝐅𝐅{\bf F}bold_F. More specifically, because the inner skyrmions have Q=1𝑄1Q=-1italic_Q = - 1, the force from the outer skyrmion boundary drives their motion in the azimuth direction of anticlockwise (clockwise) sense, when 𝐅𝐅{\bf F}bold_F is attractive (repulsive). Then, we introduce the rotation angle of the skyrmion bags Θ(t)=(1/n)Σi=1nθi(t)Θ𝑡1𝑛superscriptsubscriptΣ𝑖1𝑛subscript𝜃𝑖𝑡\varTheta(t)=(1/n)\ \Sigma_{i=1}^{n}\theta_{i}(t)roman_Θ ( italic_t ) = ( 1 / italic_n ) roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ), with θi(t)subscript𝜃𝑖𝑡\theta_{i}(t)italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) being the rotation angle of each inner skyrmion. The variation of ΘΘ\varThetaroman_Θ versus time under different Hzsubscript𝐻𝑧H_{z}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is shown in Fig. 2 (c). It can be seen that the rotational motion is a transient phenomenon. Specifically, as time progresses, ΘΘ\varThetaroman_Θ exhibits a rapid increase, followed by a gradual decline. For Hz=0subscript𝐻𝑧0H_{z}=0italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0, the maximum value of the rotation angle ΘmaxsubscriptΘ𝑚𝑎𝑥\varTheta_{max}roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_a italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT reaches up to about 40 degrees. As Hzsubscript𝐻𝑧H_{z}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT increases, ΘΘ\varThetaroman_Θ tends to reach the maximum value at an earlier stage, and ΘmaxsubscriptΘ𝑚𝑎𝑥\varTheta_{max}roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_a italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT undergoes a gradual reduction, as shown in the inset of Fig. 2 (c). We also find that the applied static field Hzsubscript𝐻𝑧H_{z}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT enhances the decay in ΘΘ\varThetaroman_Θ. This is due to the fact that as Hzsubscript𝐻𝑧H_{z}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT increases, the outer skyrmion tends to shrink, and the inner skyrmions are subject to a repulsive force toward the center, leading to rotation in the opposite direction. The magnitude of the decay in ΘΘ\varThetaroman_Θ is minimal when Hz=0subscript𝐻𝑧0H_{z}=0italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0, even as time extends to 100 ns. So the case of zero static field is exclusively considered in the following studies. We next aim at analyzing the physical origin of the rotational motion. As shown in Fig. 1, two distinct regions are defined in the 2D space, each with 30×30303030\times 3030 × 30 sites. Region 1 completely covers the central inner skyrmion, and Region 2 covers part of the boundary of the outer skyrmion. The time-dependent variations of z𝑧zitalic_z-component magnetizations within the two regions (defined as mz1subscript𝑚𝑧1m_{z1}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and mz2subscript𝑚𝑧2m_{z2}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) are extracted, which respectively reflect the breathing behaviors of inner and outer skyrmions in response to the vertical microwave fields. We choose three representative time intervals: the initial stage from 0.5 to 1.0 ns, the intermediate stage from 10.0 to 10.5 ns, and the stable stage from 59.5 to 60.0 ns. Here, we concentrate on the time frame within 60 ns. This decision is based on the observation from Fig. 2, which indicates that the rotation angle reaches its maximum at around 45 ns, suggesting that a 60 ns window is sufficient for our analysis. In Fig. 3 (a)-(c), the variations of mz1subscript𝑚𝑧1m_{z1}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and mz2subscript𝑚𝑧2m_{z2}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are plotted as a function of time for these selected stages. Figure 3 (a) shows distinct asynchronous oscillations, where the amplitude of the oscillation curve for mz1subscript𝑚𝑧1m_{z1}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT consistently remains stable, while the amplitude of mz2subscript𝑚𝑧2m_{z2}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT appears weaker and unstable. We define the phase difference ΔΦΔΦ\Delta\varPhiroman_Δ roman_Φ as the time difference between the moments at which the fluctuations of mz1subscript𝑚𝑧1m_{z1}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and mz2subscript𝑚𝑧2m_{z2}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT reach their peaks within one function period. It is obvious that ΔΦΔΦ\Delta\varPhiroman_Δ roman_Φ becomes smaller as time increases. At this point, we put forward a conjecture that the transient rotational motion of skyrmion bags results from the asynchrony in the breathing behaviors between the inner skyrmions and the outer skyrmion. To verify the above hypothesis, we calculate the angular velocity ω𝜔\omegaitalic_ω of the rotation, which is the derivative of the rotation angle with respect to time, defined as ω=dΘ/dt𝜔𝑑Θ𝑑𝑡\omega=d\varTheta/dtitalic_ω = italic_d roman_Θ / italic_d italic_t. We then compare the time profile of ω𝜔\omegaitalic_ω with that of the phase difference ΔΦ(t)ΔΦ𝑡\Delta\varPhi(t)roman_Δ roman_Φ ( italic_t ), as shown in Fig. 3 (d). From the consistency of the curve and the scatter points, we can find a significant positive correlation between ω𝜔\omegaitalic_ω and ΔΦΔΦ\Delta\varPhiroman_Δ roman_Φ, which both decrease from an initial value and gradually stabilize. This corroborates the conclusion that the rotation is induced by the asynchrony in breathing behaviors, and further demonstrates that the velocity of the rotational motion is determined by ΔΦΔΦ\Delta\varPhiroman_Δ roman_Φ. In order to investigate the underlying mechanism of the phase difference, we extracted the diameter of the outer skyrmion d𝑑ditalic_d as a function of time during the rotation, as shown in Fig. 3 (e). The simulation results reveal that d𝑑ditalic_d gradually increases during the oscillation and converge to a constant. This increasing trend is fitted by an exponential function with horizontal asymptote d=ab*ct𝑑𝑎𝑏superscript𝑐𝑡d=a-b*c^{t}italic_d = italic_a - italic_b * italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where a=186.0𝑎186.0a=186.0italic_a = 186.0, b=6.88𝑏6.88b=6.88italic_b = 6.88 and c=0.97𝑐0.97c=0.97italic_c = 0.97. Regarding this phenomenon, we offer the following explanation: in this response mode, the breathing of inner skyrmions is spontaneous, while the breathing of the outer skyrmion is induced by the former. Hence, as time progresses, the phases of their oscillations trend to gradually converge. Furthermore, when inner skyrmions start continuous breathing from the initial static state, they exert an interaction potential that encourages expansion on the passively oscillating outer skyrmion, resulting in a slight increase in d𝑑ditalic_d. Consequently, the reaction of this potential becomes the driving force for the forced rotation of skyrmion bags.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (a) The rotation angle ΘΘ\varThetaroman_Θ plotted as a function of time for various skyrmion numbers Q𝑄Qitalic_Q. Inset: the maximum value of rotation angle ΘmaxsubscriptΘ𝑚𝑎𝑥\varTheta_{max}roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_a italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for the four diffetenr Q𝑄Qitalic_Q. (b) The rotation angle ΘΘ\varThetaroman_Θ plotted as a function of time for various outer skyrmion diameter d𝑑ditalic_d. Inset: the maximum value of rotation angle ΘmaxsubscriptΘ𝑚𝑎𝑥\varTheta_{max}roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_a italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for the three diffetenr d𝑑ditalic_d.

Finally, we discuss the rotation behavior of skyrmion bags with different skyrmion numbers, where |Q|=13𝑄13\left|Q\right|=13| italic_Q | = 13, 8, and 3 are selected for comparison. After applying 𝐇f*superscriptsubscript𝐇𝑓{\bf H}_{f}^{*}bold_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT to find their resonance frequencies, we excite their high-frequency mode separately and record the time-dependent variations of ΘΘ\varThetaroman_Θ, as shown in Fig. 4 (a). Clearly, the variations can be categorized into two distinct trends. For skyrmion bags with |Q|=18𝑄18\left|Q\right|=18| italic_Q | = 18 and 13, ΘΘ\varThetaroman_Θ exhibits a slight decrease or fluctuation after reaching its maximum, depending on the specific symmetry of the spin configurations; whereas for skyrmion bags with |Q|=8𝑄8\left|Q\right|=8| italic_Q | = 8 and 3, ΘΘ\varThetaroman_Θ rapidly returns to zero after reaching its maximum, indicating a reverse rotation back to the initial position. We further extract the maximum value of rotation angle ΘmaxsubscriptΘ𝑚𝑎𝑥\varTheta_{max}roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_a italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, for the four situations, as shown in the inset of Fig. 4 (a). It can be summarized that for a smaller |Q|𝑄\left|Q\right|| italic_Q | of skyrmion bags, the achievable ΘmaxsubscriptΘ𝑚𝑎𝑥\varTheta_{max}roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_a italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT tends to be smaller. This is because when there are more inner skyrmions, the overall oscillation generated by their breathing mode is stronger, resulting in a larger driving force to maintain the rotation. The results indicates that the rotation is more likely to occur for skyrmion bags with larger |Q|𝑄\left|Q\right|| italic_Q |, while it is less likely to be observed in skyrmion bags with smaller |Q|𝑄\left|Q\right|| italic_Q |. Interestingly, we noticed that as |Q|𝑄\left|Q\right|| italic_Q | decreases, the diameter of the outer skyrmion d𝑑ditalic_d also decreases at the same time. In order to verify whether the above conclusion is attributed by changes in |Q|𝑄\left|Q\right|| italic_Q | or d𝑑ditalic_d, we conducted additional simulations by proportionally reducing d𝑑ditalic_d through adjusting the DMI constant. The impact of d𝑑ditalic_d on the rotational behavior is illustrated in Fig. 4 (b). The reduction of d𝑑ditalic_d does weaken the rotation, indicating that, for a constant |Q|𝑄\left|Q\right|| italic_Q |, the rotational behavior is more pronounced in larger-sized skyrmion bags. However, the decrease in d𝑑ditalic_d does not lead to a rapid decay similar to that observed for smaller |Q|𝑄\left|Q\right|| italic_Q |. Because d𝑑ditalic_d is approximately 130 sites when |Q|=8𝑄8\left|Q\right|=8| italic_Q | = 8, we can compare the results of |Q|=8𝑄8\left|Q\right|=8| italic_Q | = 8 and d=130𝑑130d=130italic_d = 130 to confirm this point.

IV Conclusion and Prospect

In conclusion, we have investigated a global rotational motion of skyrmion bags in response to microwave magnetic fields. This behavior is specific to the high-frequency mode, and is characterized by the inner skyrmions rotating cohesively around the central point. It has been proven that the angular velocity of the rotation is directly related to the phase difference between the oscillations of inner and outer skyrmions. And the driving force of the rotation arises from the interaction potential of the outer skyrmion boundary acting on the inner skyrmions. It is also found that the rotation is more prone to occur in skyrmion bags with larger skyrmion numbers. Although the rotation is a transient dynamics, it enables the possibility of manipulation of skyrmion bags by activating the eigenmode. Specially, it induces both spatial and temporal variations in magnetization, providing potential to generate rich spintronic phenomena and applications such as spinmotive force [48] and programmable logic device.[53] In a real system, the rotation may be influenced by temperture, but we believe that under small thermal fluctuations, the skyrmion bag will experience some distortion without undergoing fundamental changes in its rotational behavior.[48] Our findings hold significance for the microwave-controlled dynamics of skyrmion bags, and may extend to other topological configurations featuring multiple domains.

Acknowledgements.
X.C.Z. and M.M. acknowledge support by the JST CREST (Project No. JPMJCR20T1), the JSPS KAKENHI (Grants No. JP20H00337 and No. JP23H04522), and the Waseda University Grant for Special Research Projects (Grant No. 2023C-140). R.Z.Z and X.F.Z. acknowledge support by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (Grant No. 52225312), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1908220), and the Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. 2021C01033). L.B. thanks the financial support by China Scholarship Council (Award No. 202206080023).

AUTHOR DECLARATIONS

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  • Nagaosa and Tokura [2013] N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, “Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions,” Nature nanotechnology 8, 899–911 (2013).
  • Mochizuki and Seki [2015] M. Mochizuki and S. Seki, “Dynamical magnetoelectric phenomena of multiferroic skyrmions,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 27, 503001 (2015).
  • Fert, Reyren, and Cros [2017] A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, “Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications,” Nature Reviews Materials 2, 1–15 (2017).
  • Leliaert et al. [2018] J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, J. Mulkers, J. De Clercq, M. Milošević, and B. Van Waeyenberge, “Fast micromagnetic simulations on gpu—recent advances made with,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 51, 123002 (2018).
  • Zhang et al. [2020] X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, K. M. Song, T.-E. Park, J. Xia, M. Ezawa, X. Liu, W. Zhao, G. Zhao, and S. Woo, “Skyrmion-electronics: writing, deleting, reading and processing magnetic skyrmions toward spintronic applications,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 32, 143001 (2020).
  • Göbel, Mertig, and Tretiakov [2021] B. Göbel, I. Mertig, and O. A. Tretiakov, “Beyond skyrmions: Review and perspectives of alternative magnetic quasiparticles,” Physics Reports 895, 1–28 (2021).
  • Bo et al. [2022] L. Bo, C. Hu, R. Zhao, and X. Zhang, “Micromagnetic manipulation and spin excitation of skyrmionic structures,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics  (2022).
  • Reichhardt, Reichhardt, and Milošević [2022] C. Reichhardt, C. J. O. Reichhardt, and M. Milošević, ‘‘Statics and dynamics of skyrmions interacting with disorder and nanostructures,” Reviews of Modern Physics 94, 035005 (2022).
  • Roessler, Bogdanov, and Pfleiderer [2006] U. K. Roessler, A. Bogdanov, and C. Pfleiderer, “Spontaneous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals,” Nature 442, 797–801 (2006).
  • Finocchio et al. [2016] G. Finocchio, F. Büttner, R. Tomasello, M. Carpentieri, and M. Kläui, “Magnetic skyrmions: from fundamental to applications,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 49, 423001 (2016).
  • Jiang et al. [2017a] W. Jiang, G. Chen, K. Liu, J. Zang, S. G. Te Velthuis, and A. Hoffmann, “Skyrmions in magnetic multilayers,” Physics Reports 704, 1–49 (2017a).
  • Kanazawa, Seki, and Tokura [2017] N. Kanazawa, S. Seki, and Y. Tokura, ‘‘Noncentrosymmetric magnets hosting magnetic skyrmions,” Advanced Materials 29, 1603227 (2017).
  • Everschor-Sitte et al. [2018] K. Everschor-Sitte, J. Masell, R. M. Reeve, and M. Kläui, “Perspective: Magnetic skyrmions—overview of recent progress in an active research field,” Journal of Applied Physics 124 (2018).
  • Back et al. [2020] C. Back, V. Cros, H. Ebert, K. Everschor-Sitte, A. Fert, M. Garst, T. Ma, S. Mankovsky, T. Monchesky, M. Mostovoy, et al., “The 2020 skyrmionics roadmap,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 53, 363001 (2020).
  • Fujishiro, Kanazawa, and Tokura [2020] Y. Fujishiro, N. Kanazawa, and Y. Tokura, “Engineering skyrmions and emergent monopoles in topological spin crystals,” Applied Physics Letters 116 (2020).
  • Foster et al. [2019] D. Foster, C. Kind, P. J. Ackerman, J.-S. B. Tai, M. R. Dennis, and I. I. Smalyukh, “Two-dimensional skyrmion bags in liquid crystals and ferromagnets,” Nature Physics 15, 655–659 (2019).
  • Rybakov and Kiselev [2019] F. N. Rybakov and N. S. Kiselev, “Chiral magnetic skyrmions with arbitrary topological charge,” Physical Review B 99, 064437 (2019).
  • Tang et al. [2021] J. Tang, Y. Wu, W. Wang, L. Kong, B. Lv, W. Wei, J. Zang, M. Tian, and H. Du, “Magnetic skyrmion bundles and their current-driven dynamics,” Nature Nanotechnology 16, 1086–1091 (2021).
  • Powalla et al. [2023] L. Powalla, M. T. Birch, K. Litzius, S. Wintz, F. S. Yasin, L. A. Turnbull, F. Schulz, D. A. Mayoh, G. Balakrishnan, M. Weigand, et al., “Seeding and emergence of composite skyrmions in a van der waals magnet,” Advanced Materials 35, 2208930 (2023).
  • Yang et al. [2023] S. Yang, Y. Zhao, K. Wu, Z. Chu, X. Xu, X. Li, J. Åkerman, and Y. Zhou, “Reversible conversion between skyrmions and skyrmioniums,” Nature Communications 14, 3406 (2023).
  • Zheng et al. [2022] F. Zheng, N. S. Kiselev, L. Yang, V. M. Kuchkin, F. N. Rybakov, S. Blügel, and R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, “Skyrmion–antiskyrmion pair creation and annihilation in a cubic chiral magnet,” Nature Physics 18, 863–868 (2022).
  • Kind, Friedemann, and Read [2020] C. Kind, S. Friedemann, and D. Read, “Existence and stability of skyrmion bags in thin magnetic films,” Applied Physics Letters 116, 022413 (2020).
  • Bo et al. [2023] L. Bo, R. Zhao, C. Hu, X. Zhang, X. Zhang, and M. Mochizuki, “Controllable creation of skyrmion bags in a ferromagnetic nanodisk,” Physical Review B 107, 224431 (2023).
  • Zeng et al. [2020] Z. Zeng, C. Zhang, C. Jin, J. Wang, C. Song, Y. Ma, Q. Liu, and J. Wang, “Dynamics of skyrmion bags driven by the spin–orbit torque,” Applied Physics Letters 117, 172404 (2020).
  • Kind and Foster [2021] C. Kind and D. Foster, “Magnetic skyrmion binning,” Physical Review B 103, L100413 (2021).
  • Zeng et al. [2022a] Z. Zeng, N. Mehmood, Y. Ma, J. Wang, J. Wang, and Q. Liu, “The skyrmion bags in an anisotropy gradient,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 34, 395801 (2022a).
  • Chen and Li [2022] R. Chen and Y. Li, “Voltage-controlled skyrmionic interconnect with multiple magnetic information carriers,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 14, 30420–30434 (2022).
  • Zhang et al. [2022] Z. Zhang, M. Xu, G. Jiang, J. Zhang, D. Meng, W. Chen, Y. Chen, and C. Hu, “High-density racetrack memory based on magnetic skyrmion bags controlled by voltage gates,” Journal of Applied Physics 132 (2022).
  • Wang and Hu [2023] X. Wang and X. Hu, “Particle-continuum duality of skyrmions,” Physical Review B 107, 174412 (2023).
  • Kuchkin et al. [2020] V. M. Kuchkin, B. Barton-Singer, F. N. Rybakov, S. Blügel, B. J. Schroers, and N. S. Kiselev, “Magnetic skyrmions, chiral kinks, and holomorphic functions,” Physical Review B 102, 144422 (2020).
  • Mochizuki [2012] M. Mochizuki, “Spin-wave modes and their intense excitation effects in skyrmion crystals,” Physical Review Letters 108, 017601 (2012).
  • Onose et al. [2012] Y. Onose, Y. Okamura, S. Seki, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura, ‘‘Observation of magnetic excitations of skyrmion crystal in a helimagnetic insulator cu 2 oseo 3,” Physical review letters 109, 037603 (2012).
  • Kim et al. [2014] J.-V. Kim, F. Garcia-Sanchez, J. Sampaio, C. Moreau-Luchaire, V. Cros, and A. Fert, “Breathing modes of confined skyrmions in ultrathin magnetic dots,” Physical Review B 90, 064410 (2014).
  • Liu, Lake, and Zang [2018a] Y. Liu, R. K. Lake, and J. Zang, ‘‘Shape dependent resonant modes of skyrmions in magnetic nanodisks,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 455, 9–13 (2018a).
  • Mochizuki and Seki [2013] M. Mochizuki and S. Seki, “Magnetoelectric resonances and predicted microwave diode effect of the skyrmion crystal in a multiferroic chiral-lattice magnet,” Physical Review B 87, 134403 (2013).
  • Finocchio et al. [2015] G. Finocchio, M. Ricci, R. Tomasello, A. Giordano, M. Lanuzza, V. Puliafito, P. Burrascano, B. Azzerboni, and M. Carpentieri, “Skyrmion based microwave detectors and harvesting,” Applied Physics Letters 107 (2015).
  • Liu et al. [2015] R. Liu, W. Lim, S. Urazhdin, et al., “Dynamical skyrmion state in a spin current nano-oscillator with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy,” Physical review letters 114, 137201 (2015).
  • Navau, Del-Valle, and Sanchez [2016] C. Navau, N. Del-Valle, and A. Sanchez, “Analytical trajectories of skyrmions in confined geometries: Skyrmionic racetracks and nano-oscillators,” Physical Review B 94, 184104 (2016).
  • Raeliarijaona, Nepal, and Kovalev [2018] A. Raeliarijaona, R. Nepal, and A. A. Kovalev, “Boundary twists, instabilities, and creation of skyrmions and antiskyrmions,” Physical Review Materials 2, 124401 (2018).
  • McKeever et al. [2019] B. McKeever, D. Rodrigues, D. Pinna, A. Abanov, J. Sinova, and K. Everschor-Sitte, “Characterizing breathing dynamics of magnetic skyrmions and antiskyrmions within the hamiltonian formalism,” Physical Review B 99, 054430 (2019).
  • Vigo-Cotrina [2021] H. Vigo-Cotrina, “Spin wave modes of skyrmioniums in the presence of dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 537, 168166 (2021).
  • Wang et al. [2022] J. Wang, C. Zhang, Y. Ma, Z. Zeng, N. Mehmood, Y. Yuan, J. Yang, C. Song, J. Wang, and Q. Liu, “Field-dependent shape and magnetic spectrum of magnetic bimeron,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 555, 169343 (2022).
  • Liu, Lake, and Zang [2018b] Y. Liu, R. K. Lake, and J. Zang, “Binding a hopfion in a chiral magnet nanodisk,” Physical Review B 98, 174437 (2018b).
  • Bo et al. [2021] L. Bo, L. Ji, C. Hu, R. Zhao, Y. Li, J. Zhang, and X. Zhang, “Spin excitation spectrum of a magnetic hopfion,” Applied Physics Letters 119 (2021).
  • Lonsky and Hoffmann [2020] M. Lonsky and A. Hoffmann, “Dynamic excitations of chiral magnetic textures,” APL Materials 8 (2020).
  • Zeng et al. [2022b] Z. Zeng, C. Song, J. Wang, and Q. Liu, “Spin eigenmodes of skyrmion bags,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 55, 185001 (2022b).
  • Li et al. [2023] S. Li, K. Li, Z. Liu, Q. Zhu, C. Zhao, H. Zhang, X. Shi, J. Wang, R. Wang, R. Lian, et al., “In-plane spin excitation of skyrmion bags,” Chinese Physics B  (2023).
  • Matsuki and Mochizuki [2023] J. Matsuki and M. Mochizuki, “Thermoelectric effect of a skyrmion crystal confined in a magnetic disk,” Physical Review B 107, L100408 (2023).
  • Vansteenkiste et al. [2014] A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, “The design and verification of mumax3,” AIP advances 4, 107133 (2014).
  • Sampaio et al. [2013] J. Sampaio, V. Cros, S. Rohart, A. Thiaville, and A. Fert, “Nucleation, stability and current-induced motion of isolated magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures,” Nature nanotechnology 8, 839–844 (2013).
  • Metaxas et al. [2007] P. Metaxas, J. Jamet, A. Mougin, M. Cormier, J. Ferré, V. Baltz, B. Rodmacq, B. Dieny, and R. Stamps, “Creep and flow regimes of magnetic domain-wall motion in ultrathin pt/co/pt films with perpendicular anisotropy,” Physical review letters 99, 217208 (2007).
  • Jiang et al. [2017b] W. Jiang, X. Zhang, G. Yu, W. Zhang, X. Wang, M. Benjamin Jungfleisch, J. E. Pearson, X. Cheng, O. Heinonen, K. L. Wang, et al., “Direct observation of the skyrmion hall effect,” Nature Physics 13, 162–169 (2017b).
  • Yan et al. [2021] Z. Yan, Y. Liu, Y. Guang, K. Yue, J. Feng, R. Lake, G. Yu, and X. Han, “Skyrmion-based programmable logic device with complete boolean logic functions,” Physical Review Applied 15, 064004 (2021).