Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Topological classes of thermodynamics of the rotating charged AdS black holes in gauged supergravities

Xiao-Dan Zhu1 zxdcwnu@163.com    Di Wu1 Corresponding author: wdcwnu@163.com    Dan Wen2 Corresponding author: wendan@cqupt.edu.cn 1School of Physics and Astronomy, China West Normal University, Nanchong, Sichuan 637002, People’s Republic of China
2College of Science, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanan, Chongqing 400065, People’s Republic of China
(July 27, 2024)
Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the topological numbers of rotating charged AdS black holes in both four- and five-dimensional gauged supergravity theories. Our analysis is conducted within the framework of the thermodynamical topological approach to black holes, utilizing the generalized off-shell Helmholtz free energy. We demonstrate that the number of rotation parameters plays a significant role in determining the topological numbers of five-dimensional rotating AdS black holes. Moreover, our findings indicate that the topological numbers of both four- and five-dimensional rotating AdS black holes are not influenced by the number of electric charge parameters. This highlights a distinct difference in how rotation and electric charge parameters impact the thermodynamic topological properties of these black holes.

I Introduction

There has been a great deal of interest in supergravity theories as one of the possible ways to quantize gravity. In particular, with the development of the remarkable anti-de Sitter/conformal field theory (AdS/CFT) correspondence ATMP2-231 ; PLB428-105 ; ATMP2-253 , it has become of considerable interest to investigate the thermodynamical properties of the rotating charged AdS black holes in four- and five-dimensional gauged supergravity theories PRD72-084028 ; PRD84-024037 ; NPB717-246 ; PRL95-161301 ; hep-th/0504080 ; PRD72-041901 ; PRD73-104036 ; PRL100-121301 ; PRD80-044037 ; PRD80-084009 ; PRD83-044028 ; PRD83-121502 ; PLB707-286 ; PLB726-404 ; PLB746-276 ; JHEP1121031 ; PRD101-024057 ; PRD102-044007 ; PRD103-044014 . In fact, deriving thermodynamic mass formulas PRD7-2333 ; PRD13-191 ; PRL30-71 ; PRL25-1596 ; PRD4-3552 ; PRD100-101501 ; PRD105-124013 ; PRD108-064034 ; PRD108-064035 ; PLB846-138227 and exploring the chemistry of black holes PRD92-124069 ; CQG34-063001 are just part of the broader investigation into black hole thermodynamics.

Recently, topology has become a new effective tool to study the thermodynamical properties of black holes PRD105-104003 ; PRD105-104053 ; PLB835-137591 ; PRD107-046013 ; PRD107-106009 ; JHEP0623115 ; 2305.05595 ; 2305.05916 ; 2305.15674 ; 2305.15910 ; 2306.16117 ; PRD106-064059 ; PRD107-044026 ; PRD107-064015 ; 2212.04341 ; 2302.06201 ; 2304.14988 ; 2309.00224 ; 2312.12784 ; 2402.18791 ; 2403.14730 ; 2404.02526 .111Topology can also be utilized to investigate the light rings PRL119-251102 ; PRL124-181101 ; PRD102-064039 ; PRD103-104031 ; PRD105-024049 ; PRD108-104041 ; 2401.05495 and the timelike circular orbits PRD107-064006 ; JCAP0723049 ; 2406.13270 . Remarkably, in Ref. PRL129-191101 , by considering black hole solutions as the thermodynamic topological defects, Wei et al. proposed a new systematic approach for black hole classification according to the different topological numbers of black holes. Because of its simplicity as well as adaptability, the topological method provided in Ref. PRL129-191101 quickly developed favor and was successfully utilized to explore the topological numbers for many black holes PRD107-064023 ; JHEP0123102 ; PRD107-024024 ; PRD107-084002 ; PRD107-084053 ; 2303.06814 ; 2303.13105 ; 2304.02889 ; 2306.13286 ; 2304.05695 ; 2306.05692 ; 2306.11212 ; EPJC83-365 ; 2306.02324 ; PRD108-084041 ; 2307.12873 ; 2309.14069 ; AP458-169486 ; 2310.09602 ; 2310.09907 ; 2310.15182 ; 2311.04050 ; 2311.11606 ; 2312.04325 ; 2312.06324 ; 2312.13577 ; 2312.12814 ; PS99-025003 ; 2401.16756 ; AP463-169617 ; PDU44-101437 ; 2403.14167 ; 2404.08243 ; 2405.02328 ; 2405.07525 ; 2405.20022 ; 2406.08793 ; AC48-100853 ; 2402.00106 . Very recently, we explored the topological numbers of static multi-charge AdS black holes within four- and five-dimensional gauged supergravities. We identified a novel temperature-dependent thermodynamic topological phase transition that occurs in the four-dimensional static-charged AdS black hole in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton-axion gauged supergravity theory, the four-dimensional static-charged AdS Horowitz-Sen black hole, and the five-dimensional static-charged AdS black hole in Kaluza-Klein gauged supergravity theory 2402.00106 . However, the topological numbers of rotating charged AdS black holes in four- and five-dimensional gauged supergravities, and whether similar temperature-dependent thermodynamic topological phase transitions occur, are still unclear and require further investigation. This is the motivation behind our current study.

In this paper, we will explore the effect of the number of charge parameters on the topological number of rotating AdS black holes in four- and five-dimensional gauged supergravity theory and the effect of the number of rotation parameters on the topological number of charged AdS black holes in five-dimensional gauged supergravity theory. We show that the topological numbers of the five-dimensional rotating AdS black holes are significantly influenced by the number of rotation parameters. Moreover, we show that the topological numbers of four- and five-dimensional rotating AdS black holes do not depend on the number of electric charge parameters.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we give a brief introduction to the thermodynamic topological approach proposed in Ref. PRL129-191101 . In Sec. III, we study the topological numbers of four-dimensional rotating pairwise-equal four-charge AdS black holes in gauged supergravity theory NPB717-246 for two different combinations of electric charge parameters, respectively. In Sec. IV, we investigate the topological numbers of five-dimensional rotating charged AdS black holes in minimal gauged supergravity theory PRL95-161301 by considering the singly-, and double-rotating cases, respectively. Furthermore, to facilitate the comparison of the effect of the charge parameter on the topological number, we also discuss the topological number of the five-dimensional double-rotating Kerr-AdS black hole. This paper ends with conclusions in Sec. V.

II A brief introduction to the thermodynamic topological approach

In this section, we give a brief introduction to the novel thermodynamic topological approach proposed in Ref. PRL129-191101 . In the beginning, according to Ref. PRL129-191101 , one can give the generalized off-shell Helmholtz free energy as

=MSτ𝑀𝑆𝜏\mathcal{F}=M-\frac{S}{\tau}caligraphic_F = italic_M - divide start_ARG italic_S end_ARG start_ARG italic_τ end_ARG (1)

for the black hole thermodynamic system with mass M𝑀Mitalic_M and entropy S𝑆Sitalic_S, the extra variable τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ can be regarded as the inverse temperature of the cavity surrounding the black hole. Only when τ=T1𝜏superscript𝑇1\tau=T^{-1}italic_τ = italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the generalized Helmholtz free energy manifests on-shell characteristics and returns to the standard Helmholtz free energy F=MTS𝐹𝑀𝑇𝑆F=M-TSitalic_F = italic_M - italic_T italic_S of the black hole PRD15-2752 ; PRD33-2092 ; PRD105-084030 ; PRD106-106015 .

In Ref. PRL129-191101 , the key vector ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ is given by

ϕ=(rh,cotΘcscΘ),italic-ϕsubscript𝑟ΘΘ\displaystyle\phi=\Big{(}\frac{\partial\mathcal{F}}{\partial r_{h}}\,,~{}-\cot% \Theta\csc\Theta\Big{)}\,,italic_ϕ = ( divide start_ARG ∂ caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG , - roman_cot roman_Θ roman_csc roman_Θ ) , (2)

where rhsubscript𝑟r_{h}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the event horizon radius of the black hole, and 0Θπ0Θ𝜋0\leq\Theta\leq\pi0 ≤ roman_Θ ≤ italic_π. The component ϕΘsuperscriptitalic-ϕΘ\phi^{\Theta}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT diverges at Θ=0Θ0\Theta=0roman_Θ = 0 and Θ=πΘ𝜋\Theta=\piroman_Θ = italic_π, and the direction of the vector points outward there.

One can apply Duan’s ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ-mapping topological currents theory SS9-1072 ; NPB514-705 ; PRD61-045004 to establish the topological current as follows:

jμ=12πϵμνρϵabνnaρnb,μ,ν,ρ=0,1,2,formulae-sequencesuperscript𝑗𝜇12𝜋superscriptitalic-ϵ𝜇𝜈𝜌subscriptitalic-ϵ𝑎𝑏subscript𝜈superscript𝑛𝑎subscript𝜌superscript𝑛𝑏𝜇𝜈𝜌012j^{\mu}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}\epsilon_{ab}\partial_{\nu}n^{a}% \partial_{\rho}n^{b}\,,\qquad\mu,\nu,\rho=0,1,2,italic_j start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_π end_ARG italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν italic_ρ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_μ , italic_ν , italic_ρ = 0 , 1 , 2 , (3)

where ν=/xνsubscript𝜈superscript𝑥𝜈\partial_{\nu}=\partial/\partial x^{\nu}∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∂ / ∂ italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, xν=(τ,rh,Θ)superscript𝑥𝜈𝜏subscript𝑟Θx^{\nu}=(\tau,~{}r_{h},~{}\Theta)italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( italic_τ , italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Θ ). The unit vector is given as n=(nr,nΘ)𝑛superscript𝑛𝑟superscript𝑛Θn=(n^{r},n^{\Theta})italic_n = ( italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) with nr=ϕrh/ϕsuperscript𝑛𝑟superscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝑟normitalic-ϕn^{r}=\phi^{r_{h}}/||\phi||italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / | | italic_ϕ | | and nΘ=ϕΘ/ϕsuperscript𝑛Θsuperscriptitalic-ϕΘnormitalic-ϕn^{\Theta}=\phi^{\Theta}/||\phi||italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / | | italic_ϕ | |. It is easy to prove that the above topological current jμsuperscript𝑗𝜇j^{\mu}italic_j start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is conserved, i.e., μjμ=0subscript𝜇superscript𝑗𝜇0\partial_{\mu}j^{\mu}=0∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0. Employing the Jacobi tensor ϵabJμ(ϕ/x)=ϵμνρνϕaρϕbsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑎𝑏superscript𝐽𝜇italic-ϕ𝑥superscriptitalic-ϵ𝜇𝜈𝜌subscript𝜈superscriptitalic-ϕ𝑎subscript𝜌superscriptitalic-ϕ𝑏\epsilon^{ab}J^{\mu}(\phi/x)=\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}\partial_{\nu}\phi^{a}% \partial_{\rho}\phi^{b}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_ϕ / italic_x ) = italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν italic_ρ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the topological current could be expressed as a δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ-function of the field configuration

jμ=δ2(ϕ)Jμ(ϕx).superscript𝑗𝜇superscript𝛿2italic-ϕsuperscript𝐽𝜇italic-ϕ𝑥j^{\mu}=\delta^{2}(\phi)J^{\mu}\Big{(}\frac{\phi}{x}\Big{)}\,.italic_j start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_ϕ ) italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_ϕ end_ARG start_ARG italic_x end_ARG ) . (4)

This indicates that jμsuperscript𝑗𝜇j^{\mu}italic_j start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is nonzero only at the zero points of ϕa(xi)superscriptitalic-ϕ𝑎subscript𝑥𝑖\phi^{a}(x_{i})italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), namely, ϕa(xi)=0superscriptitalic-ϕ𝑎subscript𝑥𝑖0\phi^{a}(x_{i})=0italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = 0. Consequently, one can employ the following formula to determine the topological number in the given parameter region ΣΣ\Sigmaroman_Σ:

W=Σj0d2x=i=1Nβiηi=i=1Nwi,𝑊subscriptΣsuperscript𝑗0superscript𝑑2𝑥superscriptsubscript𝑖1𝑁subscript𝛽𝑖subscript𝜂𝑖superscriptsubscript𝑖1𝑁subscript𝑤𝑖W=\int_{\Sigma}j^{0}d^{2}x=\sum_{i=1}^{N}\beta_{i}\eta_{i}=\sum_{i=1}^{N}w_{i}\,,italic_W = ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (5)

where the positive Hopf index βisubscript𝛽𝑖\beta_{i}italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT represents the number of loops caused by ϕasuperscriptitalic-ϕ𝑎\phi^{a}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in the vector ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ-space as xμsuperscript𝑥𝜇x^{\mu}italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT moves surrounding the zero point zisubscript𝑧𝑖z_{i}italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the Brouwer degree ηi=sign(J0(ϕ/x)zi)=±1subscript𝜂𝑖signsuperscript𝐽0subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑥subscript𝑧𝑖plus-or-minus1\eta_{i}=\mathrm{sign}(J^{0}({\phi}/{x})_{z_{i}})=\pm 1italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_sign ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_ϕ / italic_x ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = ± 1, and wisubscript𝑤𝑖w_{i}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the winding number for the i𝑖iitalic_ith zero point of ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ. Notably, one important tool for assessing local thermodynamic stability is the local winding number wisubscript𝑤𝑖w_{i}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The thermodynamic stability of black holes is shown by positive wisubscript𝑤𝑖w_{i}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT values, while unstable ones are indicated by negative values. In a exact black hole solution at a given temperature, thermodynamically stable and unstable black holes are distinguished by the global topological number W𝑊Witalic_W.

III Four-dimensional rotating pairwise-equal four-charge AdS black holes in gauged supergravity theory

In this section, we will investigate the topological numbers of the four-dimensional rotating pairwise-equal four-charge AdS black holes in gauged supergravity theory NPB717-246 . The metric and two Abelian gauge potentials of this black hole are given by

ds42𝑑superscriptsubscript𝑠42\displaystyle ds_{4}^{2}italic_d italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =\displaystyle== ΔrW(dtasin2θΞdφ)2+W(dr2Δr+dθ2Δθ)subscriptΔ𝑟𝑊superscript𝑑𝑡𝑎superscript2𝜃Ξ𝑑𝜑2𝑊𝑑superscript𝑟2subscriptΔ𝑟𝑑superscript𝜃2subscriptΔ𝜃\displaystyle-\frac{\Delta_{r}}{W}\left(dt-\frac{a\sin^{2}\theta}{\Xi}d\varphi% \right)^{2}+W\left(\frac{dr^{2}}{\Delta_{r}}+\frac{d\theta^{2}}{\Delta_{\theta% }}\right)- divide start_ARG roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_W end_ARG ( italic_d italic_t - divide start_ARG italic_a roman_sin start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ξ end_ARG italic_d italic_φ ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_W ( divide start_ARG italic_d italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG italic_d italic_θ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) (6)
+Δθsin2θW(adtr1r2+a2Ξdφ)2,subscriptΔ𝜃superscript2𝜃𝑊superscript𝑎𝑑𝑡subscript𝑟1subscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2Ξ𝑑𝜑2\displaystyle+\frac{\Delta_{\theta}\sin^{2}\theta}{W}\left(adt-\frac{r_{1}r_{2% }+a^{2}}{\Xi}d\varphi\right)^{2}\,,+ divide start_ARG roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_sin start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ end_ARG start_ARG italic_W end_ARG ( italic_a italic_d italic_t - divide start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ξ end_ARG italic_d italic_φ ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,
A1subscript𝐴1\displaystyle A_{1}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== 2r12q1(q1+m)W(dtasin2θΞdφ),2subscript𝑟12subscript𝑞1subscript𝑞1𝑚𝑊𝑑𝑡𝑎superscript2𝜃Ξ𝑑𝜑\displaystyle\frac{2r_{1}\sqrt{2q_{1}(q_{1}+m)}}{W}\left(dt-\frac{a\sin^{2}% \theta}{\Xi}d\varphi\right)\,,divide start_ARG 2 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG 2 italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_m ) end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_W end_ARG ( italic_d italic_t - divide start_ARG italic_a roman_sin start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ξ end_ARG italic_d italic_φ ) ,
A2subscript𝐴2\displaystyle A_{2}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== 2r22q2(q2+m)W(dtasin2θΞdφ),2subscript𝑟22subscript𝑞2subscript𝑞2𝑚𝑊𝑑𝑡𝑎superscript2𝜃Ξ𝑑𝜑\displaystyle\frac{2r_{2}\sqrt{2q_{2}(q_{2}+m)}}{W}\left(dt-\frac{a\sin^{2}% \theta}{\Xi}d\varphi\right)\,,divide start_ARG 2 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG 2 italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_m ) end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_W end_ARG ( italic_d italic_t - divide start_ARG italic_a roman_sin start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ξ end_ARG italic_d italic_φ ) ,

where

r1subscript𝑟1\displaystyle r_{1}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== r+2q1,r2=r+2q2,𝑟2subscript𝑞1subscript𝑟2𝑟2subscript𝑞2\displaystyle r+2q_{1}\,,\qquad r_{2}=r+2q_{2}\,,italic_r + 2 italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_r + 2 italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ,
ΔrsubscriptΔ𝑟\displaystyle\Delta_{r}roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== r2+a22mr+r1r2l2(r1r2+a2),Ξ=1a2l2,superscript𝑟2superscript𝑎22𝑚𝑟subscript𝑟1subscript𝑟2superscript𝑙2subscript𝑟1subscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2Ξ1superscript𝑎2superscript𝑙2\displaystyle r^{2}+a^{2}-2mr+\frac{r_{1}r_{2}}{l^{2}}(r_{1}r_{2}+a^{2})\,,% \quad\Xi=1-\frac{a^{2}}{l^{2}}\,,italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 italic_m italic_r + divide start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , roman_Ξ = 1 - divide start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ,
ΔθsubscriptΔ𝜃\displaystyle\Delta_{\theta}roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== 1a2l2cos2θ,W=r1r2+a2cos2θ,1superscript𝑎2superscript𝑙2superscript2𝜃𝑊subscript𝑟1subscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2superscript2𝜃\displaystyle 1-\frac{a^{2}}{l^{2}}\cos^{2}\theta\,,\qquad W=r_{1}r_{2}+a^{2}% \cos^{2}\theta\,,1 - divide start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG roman_cos start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ , italic_W = italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_cos start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ ,

in which a𝑎aitalic_a is the rotation parameter, l𝑙litalic_l is the AdS radius, m𝑚mitalic_m, q1subscript𝑞1q_{1}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and q2subscript𝑞2q_{2}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the mass and two independent electric charge parameters, respectively.

In addition, there is a special truncated supergravity solution: when the electric charge parameters q10subscript𝑞10q_{1}\neq 0italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≠ 0 and q2=0subscript𝑞20q_{2}=0italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0, this is known as the rotating charged AdS black hole solution in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton-axion (EMDA) supergravity theory.

The thermodynamic quantities are given by PRD84-024037

M=m+q1+q2Ξ2,S=π(r1r2+a2)Ξ,formulae-sequence𝑀𝑚subscript𝑞1subscript𝑞2superscriptΞ2𝑆𝜋subscript𝑟1subscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2Ξ\displaystyle M=\frac{m+q_{1}+q_{2}}{\Xi^{2}}\,,\qquad S=\frac{\pi(r_{1}r_{2}+% a^{2})}{\Xi}\,,italic_M = divide start_ARG italic_m + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , italic_S = divide start_ARG italic_π ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ξ end_ARG , (7)
Q1=Q2=q1(q1+m)2Ξ,Q3=Q4=q2(q2+m)2Ξ,formulae-sequencesubscript𝑄1subscript𝑄2subscript𝑞1subscript𝑞1𝑚2Ξsubscript𝑄3subscript𝑄4subscript𝑞2subscript𝑞2𝑚2Ξ\displaystyle Q_{1}=Q_{2}=\frac{\sqrt{q_{1}(q_{1}+m)}}{2\Xi}\,,~{}~{}Q_{3}=Q_{% 4}=\frac{\sqrt{q_{2}(q_{2}+m)}}{2\Xi}\,,italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG square-root start_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_m ) end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG 2 roman_Ξ end_ARG , italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG square-root start_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_m ) end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG 2 roman_Ξ end_ARG ,
T=rhΔ(rh)4π(r1r2+a2),Ω=a(l2+r1r2)l2(r1r2+a2),formulae-sequence𝑇subscriptsubscript𝑟Δsubscript𝑟4𝜋subscript𝑟1subscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2Ω𝑎superscript𝑙2subscript𝑟1subscript𝑟2superscript𝑙2subscript𝑟1subscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2\displaystyle T=\frac{\partial_{r_{h}}\Delta(r_{h})}{4\pi(r_{1}r_{2}+a^{2})}\,% ,\qquad\Omega=\frac{a(l^{2}+r_{1}r_{2})}{l^{2}(r_{1}r_{2}+a^{2})}\,,italic_T = divide start_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Δ ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_π ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_ARG , roman_Ω = divide start_ARG italic_a ( italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_ARG ,
Φ1=Φ2=2r1q1(q1+m)r1r2+a2,P=38πl2,formulae-sequencesubscriptΦ1subscriptΦ22subscript𝑟1subscript𝑞1subscript𝑞1𝑚subscript𝑟1subscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2𝑃38𝜋superscript𝑙2\displaystyle\Phi_{1}=\Phi_{2}=\frac{2r_{1}\sqrt{q_{1}(q_{1}+m)}}{r_{1}r_{2}+a% ^{2}}\,,\quad P=\frac{3}{8\pi l^{2}}\,,roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 2 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_m ) end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , italic_P = divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ,
Φ3=Φ4=2r2q2(q2+m)r1r2+a2,J=Ma,formulae-sequencesubscriptΦ3subscriptΦ42subscript𝑟2subscript𝑞2subscript𝑞2𝑚subscript𝑟1subscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2𝐽𝑀𝑎\displaystyle\Phi_{3}=\Phi_{4}=\frac{2r_{2}\sqrt{q_{2}(q_{2}+m)}}{r_{1}r_{2}+a% ^{2}}\,,\quad J=Ma\,,roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 2 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_m ) end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , italic_J = italic_M italic_a ,
V=4π3Ξ(rh+q1+q2)(r1r2+a2)+4π3aJ,𝑉4𝜋3Ξsubscript𝑟subscript𝑞1subscript𝑞2subscript𝑟1subscript𝑟2superscript𝑎24𝜋3𝑎𝐽\displaystyle V=\frac{4\pi}{3\Xi}(r_{h}+q_{1}+q_{2})(r_{1}r_{2}+a^{2})+\frac{4% \pi}{3}aJ\,,italic_V = divide start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG start_ARG 3 roman_Ξ end_ARG ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + divide start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_a italic_J ,

(evaluated at r=rh𝑟subscript𝑟r=r_{h}italic_r = italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT).

It is simple to prove that the above thermodynamic quantities (LABEL:therm) satisfy the first law and the Bekenstein-Smarr mass formula simultaneously

dM𝑑𝑀\displaystyle dMitalic_d italic_M =\displaystyle== TdS+ΩdJ+i=14ΦidQi+VdP,𝑇𝑑𝑆Ω𝑑𝐽superscriptsubscript𝑖14subscriptΦ𝑖𝑑subscript𝑄𝑖𝑉𝑑𝑃\displaystyle TdS+\Omega dJ+\sum_{i=1}^{4}\Phi_{i}dQ_{i}+VdP\,,italic_T italic_d italic_S + roman_Ω italic_d italic_J + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_V italic_d italic_P , (8)
M𝑀\displaystyle Mitalic_M =\displaystyle== 2TS+2ΩJ+i=14ΦiQi2VP.2𝑇𝑆2Ω𝐽superscriptsubscript𝑖14subscriptΦ𝑖subscript𝑄𝑖2𝑉𝑃\displaystyle 2TS+2\Omega J+\sum_{i=1}^{4}\Phi_{i}Q_{i}-2VP\,.2 italic_T italic_S + 2 roman_Ω italic_J + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 2 italic_V italic_P . (9)

Using the definition of the generalized off-shell Helmholtz free energy (1) and substituting the relation l2=3/(8πP)superscript𝑙238𝜋𝑃l^{2}=3/(8\pi P)italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 3 / ( 8 italic_π italic_P ) PRD84-024037 ; CPL23-1096 ; CQG26-195011 , one can arrive at

\displaystyle\mathcal{F}caligraphic_F =\displaystyle== 4πP3rhΞ2(rh+2q1)(rh+2q2)[rh2+2rh(q1+q2)\displaystyle\frac{4\pi P}{3r_{h}\Xi^{2}}(r_{h}+2q_{1})(r_{h}+2q_{2})\Big{[}r_% {h}^{2}+2r_{h}(q_{1}+q_{2})divide start_ARG 4 italic_π italic_P end_ARG start_ARG 3 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) [ italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 2 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (10)
+4q1q2+a2]+12rhΞ2[rh2+2rh(q1+q2)+a2]\displaystyle+4q_{1}q_{2}+a^{2}\Big{]}+\frac{1}{2r_{h}\Xi^{2}}\Big{[}r_{h}^{2}% +2r_{h}(q_{1}+q_{2})+a^{2}\Big{]}+ 4 italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG [ italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 2 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ]
πΞτ[rh2+2rh(q1+q2)+4q1q2+a2]𝜋Ξ𝜏delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝑟22subscript𝑟subscript𝑞1subscript𝑞24subscript𝑞1subscript𝑞2superscript𝑎2\displaystyle-\frac{\pi}{\Xi\tau}\Big{[}r_{h}^{2}+2r_{h}(q_{1}+q_{2})+4q_{1}q_% {2}+a^{2}\Big{]}- divide start_ARG italic_π end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ξ italic_τ end_ARG [ italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 2 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + 4 italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ]

for the rotating pairwise-equal four-charge AdS black hole in four-dimensional gauged supergravity theory. Then the components of the vector ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ can be computed as

ϕrhsuperscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝑟\displaystyle\phi^{r_{h}}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =\displaystyle== 12(38πPa2)2rh2τ{12πrh2(8πPa23)(rh+q1+q2)\displaystyle\frac{1}{2(3-8\pi Pa^{2})^{2}r_{h}^{2}\tau}\bigg{\{}12\pi r_{h}^{% 2}(8\pi Pa^{2}-3)(r_{h}+q_{1}+q_{2})divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 ( 3 - 8 italic_π italic_P italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ end_ARG { 12 italic_π italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 8 italic_π italic_P italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (11)
+3{3rh2+8πP(rh+2q1)(rh+2q2)[3rh2+2rh(q1+q2)\displaystyle+3\Big{\{}3r_{h}^{2}+8\pi P(r_{h}+2q_{1})(r_{h}+2q_{2})\big{[}3r_% {h}^{2}+2r_{h}(q_{1}+q_{2})+ 3 { 3 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 8 italic_π italic_P ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) [ 3 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 2 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )
4q1q2]+a2[8πP(rh24q1q2)3]}τ},\displaystyle-4q_{1}q_{2}\big{]}+a^{2}\big{[}8\pi P(r_{h}^{2}-4q_{1}q_{2})-3% \big{]}\Big{\}}\tau\bigg{\}}\,,- 4 italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ 8 italic_π italic_P ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 4 italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) - 3 ] } italic_τ } ,
ϕΘsuperscriptitalic-ϕΘ\displaystyle\phi^{\Theta}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =\displaystyle== cotΘcscΘ.ΘΘ\displaystyle-\cot\Theta\csc\Theta\,.- roman_cot roman_Θ roman_csc roman_Θ . (12)

By solving the equation: ϕrh=0superscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝑟0\phi^{r_{h}}=0italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0, one can calculate the zero point of the vector field ϕrhsuperscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝑟\phi^{r_{h}}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as

τ=4πrh2(8πPa23)(rh+q1+q2)3rh2+8πP(rh+2q1)(rh+2q2)[3rh2+2rh(q1+q2)4q1q2]+a2[8πP(rh24q1q2)3].𝜏4𝜋superscriptsubscript𝑟28𝜋𝑃superscript𝑎23subscript𝑟subscript𝑞1subscript𝑞23superscriptsubscript𝑟28𝜋𝑃subscript𝑟2subscript𝑞1subscript𝑟2subscript𝑞2delimited-[]3superscriptsubscript𝑟22subscript𝑟subscript𝑞1subscript𝑞24subscript𝑞1subscript𝑞2superscript𝑎2delimited-[]8𝜋𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟24subscript𝑞1subscript𝑞23\tau=-\frac{4\pi r_{h}^{2}(8\pi Pa^{2}-3)(r_{h}+q_{1}+q_{2})}{3r_{h}^{2}+8\pi P% (r_{h}+2q_{1})(r_{h}+2q_{2})[3r_{h}^{2}+2r_{h}(q_{1}+q_{2})-4q_{1}q_{2}]+a^{2}% [8\pi P(r_{h}^{2}-4q_{1}q_{2})-3]}\,.italic_τ = - divide start_ARG 4 italic_π italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 8 italic_π italic_P italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG start_ARG 3 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 8 italic_π italic_P ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) [ 3 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 2 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) - 4 italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ 8 italic_π italic_P ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 4 italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) - 3 ] end_ARG . (13)

It is important to note that Eq. (13) consistently reduces to the result that is derived from the case of the four-dimensional Kerr-AdS black hole PRD107-084002 when the two independent electric charge parameters q1subscript𝑞1q_{1}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and q2subscript𝑞2q_{2}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are zero. Due to the fact that there are two pairwise-equal electric charge parameters to consider, it will be much simpler to consider the topological numbers of the special two- and the general four-charge rotating AdS cases, respectively, as well as to compare the impact of the number of electric charge parameters on the topological number.

III.1 Rotating charged AdS black hole in EMDA gauged supergravity

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Zero points of the vector ϕrhsuperscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝑟\phi^{r_{h}}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT shown in the rhτsubscript𝑟𝜏r_{h}-\tauitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_τ plane with q1/r0=1subscript𝑞1subscript𝑟01q_{1}/r_{0}=1italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, Pr02=0.1𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟020.1Pr_{0}^{2}=0.1italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.1, a/r0=1𝑎subscript𝑟01a/r_{0}=1italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, and q2=0subscript𝑞20q_{2}=0italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0. There is one thermodynamically stable four-dimensional rotating charged AdS black hole in EMDA gauged supergravity theory for any value of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ. Obviously, the topological number is: W=1𝑊1W=1italic_W = 1.
Refer to caption
Figure 2: The arrows represent the unit vector field n𝑛nitalic_n on a portion of the rhΘsubscript𝑟Θr_{h}-\Thetaitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_Θ plane for the four-dimensional rotating charged AdS black hole in EMDA gauged supergravity theory with τ/r0=0.5𝜏subscript𝑟00.5\tau/r_{0}=0.5italic_τ / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.5, q1/r0=1subscript𝑞1subscript𝑟01q_{1}/r_{0}=1italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, Pr02=0.1𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟020.1Pr_{0}^{2}=0.1italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.1, a/r0=1𝑎subscript𝑟01a/r_{0}=1italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, and q2=0subscript𝑞20q_{2}=0italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0. The zero point (ZP) marked with a black dot is at (rh/r0,Θ)=(0.55,π/2)subscript𝑟subscript𝑟0Θ0.55𝜋2(r_{h}/r_{0},\Theta)=(0.55,\pi/2)( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Θ ) = ( 0.55 , italic_π / 2 ). The blue contour C𝐶Citalic_C is a closed loop enclosing the zero point.

For the four-dimensional rotating charged AdS black hole in EMDA gauged supergravity theory, one can plot the zero points of the component ϕrhsuperscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝑟\phi^{r_{h}}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with q1/r0=1subscript𝑞1subscript𝑟01q_{1}/r_{0}=1italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, Pr02=0.1𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟020.1Pr_{0}^{2}=0.1italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.1, a/r0=1𝑎subscript𝑟01a/r_{0}=1italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, and q2=0subscript𝑞20q_{2}=0italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 in Fig. 1, and the unit vector field n𝑛nitalic_n on a portion of the ΘrhΘsubscript𝑟\Theta-r_{h}roman_Θ - italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT plane in Fig. 2 with τ/r0=0.5𝜏subscript𝑟00.5\tau/r_{0}=0.5italic_τ / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.5, respectively, where r0subscript𝑟0r_{0}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT denotes an arbitrary length scale defined by the size of a cavity enclose the above black hole. As shown in Fig. 1, there is only one thermodynamically stable four-dimensional rotating charged AdS black hole in EMDA gauged supergravity theory for any value of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ. In Fig. 2, one can observe that there is a zero point located at (rh/r0,Θ)=(0.55,π/2)subscript𝑟subscript𝑟0Θ0.55𝜋2(r_{h}/r_{0},\Theta)=(0.55,\pi/2)( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Θ ) = ( 0.55 , italic_π / 2 ), thus the winding number for the blue contour C𝐶Citalic_C is w=1𝑤1w=1italic_w = 1. Based upon the local property of the zero point, one can easily obtain the topological number W=1𝑊1W=1italic_W = 1 for the four-dimensional rotating charged AdS black hole in EMDA gauged supergravity theory, which is the same as that of the four-dimensional Kerr-AdS and Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes PRD107-084002 .

III.2 Rotating pairwise-equal four-charge AdS case

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Zero points of the vector ϕrhsuperscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝑟\phi^{r_{h}}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT shown in the rhτsubscript𝑟𝜏r_{h}-\tauitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_τ plane with q1/r0=1subscript𝑞1subscript𝑟01q_{1}/r_{0}=1italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, q2/r0=3subscript𝑞2subscript𝑟03q_{2}/r_{0}=3italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3, Pr02=0.1𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟020.1Pr_{0}^{2}=0.1italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.1, and a/r0=1𝑎subscript𝑟01a/r_{0}=1italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1. There is one thermodynamically stable four-dimensional rotating pairwise-equal four-charge AdS black hole in gauged supergravity theory for any value of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ. Obviously, the topological number is: W=1𝑊1W=1italic_W = 1.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: The arrows represent the unit vector field n𝑛nitalic_n on a portion of the rhΘsubscript𝑟Θr_{h}-\Thetaitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_Θ plane for the four-dimensional rotating pairwise-equal four-charge AdS black hole in gauged supergravity theory with τ/r0=0.5𝜏subscript𝑟00.5\tau/r_{0}=0.5italic_τ / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.5, q1/r0=1subscript𝑞1subscript𝑟01q_{1}/r_{0}=1italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, q2/r0=3subscript𝑞2subscript𝑟03q_{2}/r_{0}=3italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3, Pr02=0.1𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟020.1Pr_{0}^{2}=0.1italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.1, and a/r0=1𝑎subscript𝑟01a/r_{0}=1italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1. The zero point (ZP) marked with a black dot is at (rh/r0,Θ)=(1.21,π/2)subscript𝑟subscript𝑟0Θ1.21𝜋2(r_{h}/r_{0},\Theta)=(1.21,\pi/2)( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Θ ) = ( 1.21 , italic_π / 2 ). The blue contour C𝐶Citalic_C is a closed loop enclosing the zero point.

Taking q1/r0=1subscript𝑞1subscript𝑟01q_{1}/r_{0}=1italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, q2/r0=3subscript𝑞2subscript𝑟03q_{2}/r_{0}=3italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3, Pr02=0.1𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟020.1Pr_{0}^{2}=0.1italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.1, and a/r0=1𝑎subscript𝑟01a/r_{0}=1italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 for the four-dimensional general rotating pairwise-equal four-charge AdS black hole black hole in gauged supergravity theory, we plot zero points of ϕrhsuperscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝑟\phi^{r_{h}}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in the rhτsubscript𝑟𝜏r_{h}-\tauitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_τ plane in Fig. 3, and the unit vector field n𝑛nitalic_n on a portion of the ΘrhΘsubscript𝑟\Theta-r_{h}roman_Θ - italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT plane with τ/r0=0.5𝜏subscript𝑟00.5\tau/r_{0}=0.5italic_τ / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.5 in Fig. 4, respectively. Obviously, there is only one thermodynamically stable four-dimensional rotating pairwise-equal four-charge AdS black hole in gauged supergravity theory for any value of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ. It is easy to observe that the zero point is located at (rh/r0,Θ)=(1.21,π/2)subscript𝑟subscript𝑟0Θ1.21𝜋2(r_{h}/r_{0},\Theta)=(1.21,\pi/2)( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Θ ) = ( 1.21 , italic_π / 2 ) from Fig. 4. Based upon the local property of the zero point, we can easily obtain the topological number W=1𝑊1W=1italic_W = 1 for the four-dimensional rotating pairwise-equal four-charge AdS black hole, which is also the same as that of the four-dimensional Kerr-AdS and Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes PRD107-084002 , and the four-dimensional rotating charged AdS black hole in EMDA gauged supergravity theory in the last subsection.

III.3 Discussions

In this subsection, we explore the underlying reasons why multiple electric charge parameters do not alter the topological number of four-dimensional rotating AdS black holes. Now, according to Ref. 2402.00106 , one can construct a new vector

Ψrh=τrh,ΨΘ=cotΘcscΘ.formulae-sequencesuperscriptΨsubscript𝑟𝜏subscript𝑟superscriptΨΘΘΘ\Psi^{r_{h}}=\frac{\partial\tau}{\partial r_{h}}\,,\qquad\Psi^{\Theta}=-\cot% \Theta\csc\Theta\,.roman_Ψ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG ∂ italic_τ end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG , roman_Ψ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - roman_cot roman_Θ roman_csc roman_Θ . (14)

Then, by solving the equation Ψrh=0superscriptΨsubscript𝑟0\Psi^{r_{h}}=0roman_Ψ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0 and taking the limit r0𝑟0r\to 0italic_r → 0, one can obtain the following critical relationship:

Pc=38πa2.subscript𝑃𝑐38𝜋superscript𝑎2P_{c}=\frac{3}{8\pi a^{2}}\,.italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (15)

Therefore, the presence or absence of generation and annihilation points is independent of the electric charge parameters. Additionally, according to the results given in our previous work PRD107-084002 , the generation and annihilation points of a four-dimensional Kerr-AdS black hole appear or disappear simultaneously in pairs, thereby not changing its topological number. These conclusions also hold for rotating charged AdS black holes in four-dimensional gauged supergravity theories.

IV Five-dimensional rotating charged AdS black holes in minimal gauged supergravity theory

In this section, we would like to derive the topological numbers of the five-dimensional rotating charged AdS black holes in minimal gauged supergravity theory PRL95-161301 . The line element of this black hole can be recast into a simple form in terms of the Boyer-Lindquist coordinates as follows PRD80-084009 :

ds52𝑑superscriptsubscript𝑠52\displaystyle ds_{5}^{2}italic_d italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =\displaystyle== ΔrΣX2+ΣΔrdr2+ΣΔθdθ2+(abrρZ+qρrΣX)2subscriptΔ𝑟Σsuperscript𝑋2ΣsubscriptΔ𝑟𝑑superscript𝑟2ΣsubscriptΔ𝜃𝑑superscript𝜃2superscript𝑎𝑏𝑟𝜌𝑍𝑞𝜌𝑟Σ𝑋2\displaystyle-\frac{\Delta_{r}}{\Sigma}X^{2}+\frac{\Sigma}{\Delta_{r}}dr^{2}+% \frac{\Sigma}{\Delta_{\theta}}d\theta^{2}+\left(\frac{ab}{r\rho}Z+\frac{q\rho}% {r\Sigma}X\right)^{2}- divide start_ARG roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Σ end_ARG italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG roman_Σ end_ARG start_ARG roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_d italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG roman_Σ end_ARG start_ARG roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_d italic_θ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( divide start_ARG italic_a italic_b end_ARG start_ARG italic_r italic_ρ end_ARG italic_Z + divide start_ARG italic_q italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_r roman_Σ end_ARG italic_X ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (16)
+Δθ(a2b2)2sin2θcos2θρ2ΣY2,subscriptΔ𝜃superscriptsuperscript𝑎2superscript𝑏22superscript2𝜃superscript2𝜃superscript𝜌2Σsuperscript𝑌2\displaystyle+\frac{\Delta_{\theta}(a^{2}-b^{2})^{2}\sin^{2}\theta\cos^{2}% \theta}{\rho^{2}\Sigma}Y^{2}\,,+ divide start_ARG roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_sin start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ roman_cos start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ end_ARG italic_Y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,

and the Abelian gauge potential is

A=3qΣX,𝐴3𝑞Σ𝑋A=\frac{\sqrt{3}q}{\Sigma}X\,,italic_A = divide start_ARG square-root start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_q end_ARG start_ARG roman_Σ end_ARG italic_X , (17)

where we denote

X=dtasin2θΞadφbcos2θΞbdψ,𝑋𝑑𝑡𝑎superscript2𝜃subscriptΞ𝑎𝑑𝜑𝑏superscript2𝜃subscriptΞ𝑏𝑑𝜓\displaystyle X=dt-\frac{a\sin^{2}\theta}{\Xi_{a}}d\varphi-\frac{b\cos^{2}% \theta}{\Xi_{b}}d\psi\,,italic_X = italic_d italic_t - divide start_ARG italic_a roman_sin start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_d italic_φ - divide start_ARG italic_b roman_cos start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_d italic_ψ , (18)
Y=dt(r2+a2)a(a2b2)Ξadφ(r2+b2)b(b2a2)Ξbdψ,𝑌𝑑𝑡superscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2𝑎superscript𝑎2superscript𝑏2subscriptΞ𝑎𝑑𝜑superscript𝑟2superscript𝑏2𝑏superscript𝑏2superscript𝑎2subscriptΞ𝑏𝑑𝜓\displaystyle Y=dt-\frac{(r^{2}+a^{2})a}{(a^{2}-b^{2})\Xi_{a}}d\varphi-\frac{(% r^{2}+b^{2})b}{(b^{2}-a^{2})\Xi_{b}}d\psi\,,italic_Y = italic_d italic_t - divide start_ARG ( italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_a end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_d italic_φ - divide start_ARG ( italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_b end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_d italic_ψ ,
Z=dt(r2+a2)sin2θaΞadφ(r2+b2)cos2θbΞbdψ,𝑍𝑑𝑡superscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2superscript2𝜃𝑎subscriptΞ𝑎𝑑𝜑superscript𝑟2superscript𝑏2superscript2𝜃𝑏subscriptΞ𝑏𝑑𝜓\displaystyle Z=dt-\frac{(r^{2}+a^{2})\sin^{2}\theta}{a\Xi_{a}}d\varphi-\frac{% (r^{2}+b^{2})\cos^{2}\theta}{b\Xi_{b}}d\psi\,,italic_Z = italic_d italic_t - divide start_ARG ( italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) roman_sin start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ end_ARG start_ARG italic_a roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_d italic_φ - divide start_ARG ( italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) roman_cos start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ end_ARG start_ARG italic_b roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_d italic_ψ ,

and

ΔrsubscriptΔ𝑟\displaystyle\Delta_{r}roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== (r2+a2)(r2+b2)(1r2+1l2)2m+q2+2qabr2,superscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2superscript𝑟2superscript𝑏21superscript𝑟21superscript𝑙22𝑚superscript𝑞22𝑞𝑎𝑏superscript𝑟2\displaystyle(r^{2}+a^{2})(r^{2}+b^{2})\left(\frac{1}{r^{2}}+\frac{1}{l^{2}}% \right)-2m+\frac{q^{2}+2qab}{r^{2}}\,,( italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) - 2 italic_m + divide start_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 2 italic_q italic_a italic_b end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ,
ΔθsubscriptΔ𝜃\displaystyle\Delta_{\theta}roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== 1ρ2l2,Σ=r2+ρ2,Ξa=1a2l2,formulae-sequence1superscript𝜌2superscript𝑙2Σsuperscript𝑟2superscript𝜌2subscriptΞ𝑎1superscript𝑎2superscript𝑙2\displaystyle 1-\frac{\rho^{2}}{l^{2}}\,,\quad\Sigma=r^{2}+\rho^{2}\,,\quad\Xi% _{a}=1-\frac{a^{2}}{l^{2}}\,,1 - divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , roman_Σ = italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 - divide start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ,
ρ𝜌\displaystyle\rhoitalic_ρ =\displaystyle== a2cos2θ+b2sin2θ,Ξb=1b2l2.superscript𝑎2superscript2𝜃superscript𝑏2superscript2𝜃subscriptΞ𝑏1superscript𝑏2superscript𝑙2\displaystyle\sqrt{a^{2}\cos^{2}\theta+b^{2}\sin^{2}\theta}\,,\qquad\Xi_{b}=1-% \frac{b^{2}}{l^{2}}\,.square-root start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_cos start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_sin start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ end_ARG , roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 - divide start_ARG italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG .

Here the parameters (m𝑚mitalic_m, q𝑞qitalic_q, a𝑎aitalic_a, b𝑏bitalic_b, l𝑙litalic_l) are the mass parameter, the electric charge parameter, and two independent rotation parameters of the black hole as well as the AdS radius. We point out that this solution (16) consistently reduces to the five-dimensional double-rotating Kerr-AdS black hole case AP172-304 when the electric charge parameter q𝑞qitalic_q is turned off.

The above black hole has the thermodynamic quantities PRD84-024037

M=πml2(2Ξa+2ΞbΞaΞb)+2πqab(Ξa+Ξb)4Ξa2Ξb2l2,𝑀𝜋𝑚superscript𝑙22subscriptΞ𝑎2subscriptΞ𝑏subscriptΞ𝑎subscriptΞ𝑏2𝜋𝑞𝑎𝑏subscriptΞ𝑎subscriptΞ𝑏4superscriptsubscriptΞ𝑎2superscriptsubscriptΞ𝑏2superscript𝑙2\displaystyle M=\frac{\pi ml^{2}(2\Xi_{a}+2\Xi_{b}-\Xi_{a}\Xi_{b})+2\pi qab(% \Xi_{a}+\Xi_{b})}{4\Xi_{a}^{2}\Xi_{b}^{2}l^{2}}\,,\ italic_M = divide start_ARG italic_π italic_m italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + 2 italic_π italic_q italic_a italic_b ( roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG start_ARG 4 roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (19)
S=π2[(rh2+a2)(rh2+b2)+abq]2ΞaΞbrh,𝑆superscript𝜋2delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2superscriptsubscript𝑟2superscript𝑏2𝑎𝑏𝑞2subscriptΞ𝑎subscriptΞ𝑏subscript𝑟\displaystyle S=\frac{\pi^{2}[(r_{h}^{2}+a^{2})(r_{h}^{2}+b^{2})+abq]}{2\Xi_{a% }\Xi_{b}r_{h}}\,,italic_S = divide start_ARG italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_a italic_b italic_q ] end_ARG start_ARG 2 roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ,
Ja=π[2ma+qb(2Ξa)]4Ξa2Ξb,Q=3πq4ΞaΞb,formulae-sequencesubscript𝐽𝑎𝜋delimited-[]2𝑚𝑎𝑞𝑏2subscriptΞ𝑎4superscriptsubscriptΞ𝑎2subscriptΞ𝑏𝑄3𝜋𝑞4subscriptΞ𝑎subscriptΞ𝑏\displaystyle J_{a}=\frac{\pi[2ma+qb(2-\Xi_{a})]}{4\Xi_{a}^{2}\Xi_{b}}\,,\quad Q% =\frac{\sqrt{3}\pi q}{4\Xi_{a}\Xi_{b}}\,,\quad\ italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_π [ 2 italic_m italic_a + italic_q italic_b ( 2 - roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ] end_ARG start_ARG 4 roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG , italic_Q = divide start_ARG square-root start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_π italic_q end_ARG start_ARG 4 roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ,
Jb=π[2mb+qa(2Ξb)]4ΞaΞb2,P=34πl2,formulae-sequencesubscript𝐽𝑏𝜋delimited-[]2𝑚𝑏𝑞𝑎2subscriptΞ𝑏4subscriptΞ𝑎superscriptsubscriptΞ𝑏2𝑃34𝜋superscript𝑙2\displaystyle J_{b}=\frac{\pi[2mb+qa(2-\Xi_{b})]}{4\Xi_{a}\Xi_{b}^{2}}\,,\quad P% =\frac{3}{4\pi l^{2}}\,,\quaditalic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_π [ 2 italic_m italic_b + italic_q italic_a ( 2 - roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ] end_ARG start_ARG 4 roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , italic_P = divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_π italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ,
T=rh4(l2+rh2+a2+b2)(ab+q)2l22πrhl2[(rh2+a2)(rh2+b2)+abq],𝑇superscriptsubscript𝑟4superscript𝑙2superscriptsubscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2superscript𝑏2superscript𝑎𝑏𝑞2superscript𝑙22𝜋subscript𝑟superscript𝑙2delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2superscriptsubscript𝑟2superscript𝑏2𝑎𝑏𝑞\displaystyle T=\frac{r_{h}^{4}(l^{2}+r_{h}^{2}+a^{2}+b^{2})-(ab+q)^{2}l^{2}}{% 2\pi r_{h}l^{2}[(r_{h}^{2}+a^{2})(r_{h}^{2}+b^{2})+abq]}\,,italic_T = divide start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( italic_a italic_b + italic_q ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_π italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_a italic_b italic_q ] end_ARG ,
Φ=3qrh2(rh2+a2)(rh2+b2)+abq,Φ3𝑞superscriptsubscript𝑟2superscriptsubscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2superscriptsubscript𝑟2superscript𝑏2𝑎𝑏𝑞\displaystyle\Phi=\frac{\sqrt{3}qr_{h}^{2}}{(r_{h}^{2}+a^{2})(r_{h}^{2}+b^{2})% +abq}\,,roman_Φ = divide start_ARG square-root start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_q italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_a italic_b italic_q end_ARG ,
Ωa=a(rh2+b2)(l2+rh2)+bql2l2[(rh2+a2)(rh2+b2)+abq],subscriptΩ𝑎𝑎superscriptsubscript𝑟2superscript𝑏2superscript𝑙2superscriptsubscript𝑟2𝑏𝑞superscript𝑙2superscript𝑙2delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2superscriptsubscript𝑟2superscript𝑏2𝑎𝑏𝑞\displaystyle\Omega_{a}=\frac{a(r_{h}^{2}+b^{2})(l^{2}+r_{h}^{2})+bql^{2}}{l^{% 2}[(r_{h}^{2}+a^{2})(r_{h}^{2}+b^{2})+abq]}\,,roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_a ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_b italic_q italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_a italic_b italic_q ] end_ARG ,
Ωb=b(rh2+a2)(l2+rh2)+aql2l2[(rh2+a2)(rh2+b2)+abq],subscriptΩ𝑏𝑏superscriptsubscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2superscript𝑙2superscriptsubscript𝑟2𝑎𝑞superscript𝑙2superscript𝑙2delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2superscriptsubscript𝑟2superscript𝑏2𝑎𝑏𝑞\displaystyle\Omega_{b}=\frac{b(r_{h}^{2}+a^{2})(l^{2}+r_{h}^{2})+aql^{2}}{l^{% 2}[(r_{h}^{2}+a^{2})(r_{h}^{2}+b^{2})+abq]}\,,roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_b ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_a italic_q italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_a italic_b italic_q ] end_ARG ,
V=π26ΞaΞb[3(rh2+a2)(rh2+b2)+2abq]𝑉superscript𝜋26subscriptΞ𝑎subscriptΞ𝑏delimited-[]3superscriptsubscript𝑟2superscript𝑎2superscriptsubscript𝑟2superscript𝑏22𝑎𝑏𝑞\displaystyle V=\frac{\pi^{2}}{6\Xi_{a}\Xi_{b}}[3(r_{h}^{2}+a^{2})(r_{h}^{2}+b% ^{2})+2abq]italic_V = divide start_ARG italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 6 roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG [ 3 ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + 2 italic_a italic_b italic_q ]
+2π3(aJa+bJb).2𝜋3𝑎subscript𝐽𝑎𝑏subscript𝐽𝑏\displaystyle\qquad+\frac{2\pi}{3}(aJ_{a}+bJ_{b})\,.+ divide start_ARG 2 italic_π end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ( italic_a italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_b italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) .

One can easily verify that the above thermodynamic quantities completely obey the first law and the Bekenstein-Smarr mass formula simultaneously,

dM=TdS+ΩadJa+ΩbdJb+ΦdQ+VdP,𝑑𝑀𝑇𝑑𝑆subscriptΩ𝑎𝑑subscript𝐽𝑎subscriptΩ𝑏𝑑subscript𝐽𝑏Φ𝑑𝑄𝑉𝑑𝑃dM=TdS+\Omega_{a}dJ_{a}+\Omega_{b}dJ_{b}+\Phi dQ+VdP\,,italic_d italic_M = italic_T italic_d italic_S + roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Φ italic_d italic_Q + italic_V italic_d italic_P , (20)
2M=3(TS+ΩaJa+ΩbJb)+2(ΦQVP).2𝑀3𝑇𝑆subscriptΩ𝑎subscript𝐽𝑎subscriptΩ𝑏subscript𝐽𝑏2Φ𝑄𝑉𝑃2M=3(TS+\Omega_{a}J_{a}+\Omega_{b}J_{b})+2(\Phi Q-VP)\,.2 italic_M = 3 ( italic_T italic_S + roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + 2 ( roman_Φ italic_Q - italic_V italic_P ) . (21)

Utilizing Eq. (LABEL:Therm) and and substituting the relation l2=3/(4πP)superscript𝑙234𝜋𝑃l^{2}=3/(4\pi P)italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 3 / ( 4 italic_π italic_P ), one can calculate the generalized Helmholtz free energy as

\displaystyle\mathcal{F}caligraphic_F =\displaystyle== π24Ξa2Ξb2{3rh2[(rh2+a2)(rh2+b2)(4πP3rh2+1)\displaystyle\frac{\pi}{24\Xi_{a}^{2}\Xi_{b}^{2}}\bigg{\{}\frac{3}{r_{h}^{2}}% \Big{[}(r_{h}^{2}+a^{2})(r_{h}^{2}+b^{2})\Big{(}\frac{4\pi P}{3}r_{h}^{2}+1% \Big{)}divide start_ARG italic_π end_ARG start_ARG 24 roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG { divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG [ ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( divide start_ARG 4 italic_π italic_P end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 ) (22)
+q2+2abq][2Ξa+2ΞbΞaΞb]+16πabqP\displaystyle+q^{2}+2abq\Big{]}\Big{[}2\Xi_{a}+2\Xi_{b}-\Xi_{a}\Xi_{b}\Big{]}+% 16\pi abqP+ italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 2 italic_a italic_b italic_q ] [ 2 roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] + 16 italic_π italic_a italic_b italic_q italic_P
12πΞaΞbrhτ[(rh2+a2)(rh2+b2)+abq]},\displaystyle-\frac{12\pi\Xi_{a}\Xi_{b}}{r_{h}\tau}\Big{[}(r_{h}^{2}+a^{2})(r_% {h}^{2}+b^{2})+abq\Big{]}\bigg{\}}\,,- divide start_ARG 12 italic_π roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_ARG [ ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_a italic_b italic_q ] } ,

then the components vector ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ can be easily computed as

ϕrhsuperscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝑟\displaystyle\phi^{r_{h}}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =\displaystyle== π(12rh3Ξa2Ξb2τ)1{{rh4[3+4πP(a2+b2)]\displaystyle\pi(12r_{h}^{3}\Xi_{a}^{2}\Xi_{b}^{2}\tau)^{-1}\bigg{\{}\Big{\{}-% r_{h}^{4}\Big{[}3+4\pi P(a^{2}+b^{2})\Big{]}italic_π ( 12 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT { { - italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ 3 + 4 italic_π italic_P ( italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ]
8πPrh6+3(q+ab)2}[ΞaΞb2(Ξa+Ξb)]τ\displaystyle-8\pi Pr_{h}^{6}+3(q+ab)^{2}\Big{\}}\Big{[}\Xi_{a}\Xi_{b}-2(\Xi_{% a}+\Xi_{b})\Big{]}\tau- 8 italic_π italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 3 ( italic_q + italic_a italic_b ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } [ roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 2 ( roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ] italic_τ
6πΞaΞbrh[3rh4+(a2+b2)rh2ab(ab+q)]},\displaystyle-6\pi\Xi_{a}\Xi_{b}r_{h}\Big{[}3r_{h}^{4}+(a^{2}+b^{2})r_{h}^{2}-% ab(ab+q)\Big{]}\bigg{\}}\,,\quad- 6 italic_π roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 3 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_a italic_b ( italic_a italic_b + italic_q ) ] } ,
ϕΘsuperscriptitalic-ϕΘ\displaystyle\phi^{\Theta}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =\displaystyle== cotΘcscΘ.ΘΘ\displaystyle-\cot\Theta\csc\Theta\,.- roman_cot roman_Θ roman_csc roman_Θ .

By solving the equation: ϕrh=0superscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝑟0\phi^{r_{h}}=0italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0, and it is easy to obtain

τ𝜏\displaystyle\tauitalic_τ =\displaystyle== 6πrh(4πPa23)(4πPb23)[ab(ab+q)rh2(a2+b2)\displaystyle 6\pi r_{h}(4\pi Pa^{2}-3)(4\pi Pb^{2}-3)\Big{[}ab(ab+q)-r_{h}^{2% }(a^{2}+b^{2})6 italic_π italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 4 italic_π italic_P italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 ) ( 4 italic_π italic_P italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 ) [ italic_a italic_b ( italic_a italic_b + italic_q ) - italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) (23)
3rh4]{4πP[a2(4πPb2+3)+3b2]27}1{8πPrh6\displaystyle-3r_{h}^{4}\Big{]}\bigg{\{}4\pi P\Big{[}a^{2}(4\pi Pb^{2}+3)+3b^{% 2}\Big{]}-27\bigg{\}}^{-1}\bigg{\{}8\pi Pr_{h}^{6}- 3 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] { 4 italic_π italic_P [ italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 4 italic_π italic_P italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 3 ) + 3 italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] - 27 } start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT { 8 italic_π italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
+[4πP(a2+b2)+3]rh43(ab+q)2}1\displaystyle+\Big{[}4\pi P(a^{2}+b^{2})+3\Big{]}r_{h}^{4}-3(ab+q)^{2}\bigg{\}% }^{-1}+ [ 4 italic_π italic_P ( italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + 3 ] italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 ( italic_a italic_b + italic_q ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT

as the zero point of the vector field ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ, which consistently reduces to the one obtained in the five-dimensional singly-rotating Kerr-AdS black hole case PRD107-084002 when the electric charge parameter q𝑞qitalic_q and the second rotation parameter b𝑏bitalic_b are turned off.

Similar to Sec. III, it will be more convenient to consider the topological numbers of the singly- and double-rotating charged AdS black hole cases, respectively. By the way, to make it easier to see the effect of the charge parameter on the topological number, we also discuss the topological number of the neutral double-rotating AdS black hole case (i.e., the five-dimensional double-rotating Kerr-AdS black hole case) in Sec. IV.3.

IV.1 Singly-rotating charged AdS case

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Zero points of the vector ϕrhsuperscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝑟\phi^{r_{h}}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT shown in the rhτsubscript𝑟𝜏r_{h}-\tauitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_τ plane with a/r0=1𝑎subscript𝑟01a/r_{0}=1italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, q/r02=1𝑞superscriptsubscript𝑟021q/r_{0}^{2}=1italic_q / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1, b=0𝑏0b=0italic_b = 0, and Pr02=0.1𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟020.1Pr_{0}^{2}=0.1italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.1. There is one thermodynamically stable five-dimensional singly-rotating charged AdS black hole in minimal gauged supergravity theory for any value of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ. Obviously, the topological number is: W=1𝑊1W=1italic_W = 1.
Refer to caption
Figure 6: The arrows represent the unit vector field n𝑛nitalic_n on a portion of the rhΘsubscript𝑟Θr_{h}-\Thetaitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_Θ plane for the five-dimensional singly-rotating charged AdS black hole in minimal gauged supergravity theory with τ/r0=10𝜏subscript𝑟010\tau/r_{0}=10italic_τ / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 10, a/r0=1𝑎subscript𝑟01a/r_{0}=1italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, q/r02=1𝑞superscriptsubscript𝑟021q/r_{0}^{2}=1italic_q / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1, b=0𝑏0b=0italic_b = 0, and Pr02=0.1𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟020.1Pr_{0}^{2}=0.1italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.1. The zero point (ZP) marked with a black dot is at (rh/r0,Θ)=(0.90,π/2)subscript𝑟subscript𝑟0Θ0.90𝜋2(r_{h}/r_{0},\Theta)=(0.90,\pi/2)( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Θ ) = ( 0.90 , italic_π / 2 ). The blue contour C𝐶Citalic_C is a closed loop enclosing the zero point.

In Figs. 5 and 6, taking a/r0=1𝑎subscript𝑟01a/r_{0}=1italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, q/r02=1𝑞superscriptsubscript𝑟021q/r_{0}^{2}=1italic_q / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1, b=0𝑏0b=0italic_b = 0, and Pr02=0.1𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟020.1Pr_{0}^{2}=0.1italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.1 for the five-dimensional singly-rotating charged AdS black hole in minimal gauged supergravity theory, we plot the zero points of ϕrhsuperscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝑟\phi^{r_{h}}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in the rhτsubscript𝑟𝜏r_{h}-\tauitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_τ plane and the unit vector field n𝑛nitalic_n with τ/r0=10𝜏subscript𝑟010\tau/r_{0}=10italic_τ / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 10, respectively. Note that for these values of a/r0𝑎subscript𝑟0a/r_{0}italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, q/r02𝑞superscriptsubscript𝑟02q/r_{0}^{2}italic_q / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and Pr02𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟02Pr_{0}^{2}italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, there is just one thermodynamically stable five-dimensional singly-rotating charged AdS black hole in minimal gauged supergravity theory for any value of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ. In Fig. 6, one can find that the zero point is located at (rh/r0,Θ)=(0.90,π/2)subscript𝑟subscript𝑟0Θ0.90𝜋2(r_{h}/r_{0},\Theta)=(0.90,\pi/2)( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Θ ) = ( 0.90 , italic_π / 2 ). As a result, the topological number W=1𝑊1W=1italic_W = 1 for the above black hole in five-dimensional minimal gauged supergravity theory can be explicitly established in Figs. 5 and 6 via the local property of the zero point, which is identical to that of the five-dimensional singly-rotating Kerr-AdS black hole PRD107-084002 .

IV.2 Double-rotating charged AdS case

Refer to caption
Figure 7: Zero points of the vector ϕrhsuperscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝑟\phi^{r_{h}}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT shown in the rhτsubscript𝑟𝜏r_{h}-\tauitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_τ plane with a/r0=1𝑎subscript𝑟01a/r_{0}=1italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, b/r0=2𝑏subscript𝑟02b/r_{0}=2italic_b / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2, q/r02=1𝑞superscriptsubscript𝑟021q/r_{0}^{2}=1italic_q / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1, and Pr02=0.1𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟020.1Pr_{0}^{2}=0.1italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.1. There is one thermodynamically unstable five-dimensional double-rotating charged AdS black hole in minimal gauged supergravity theory for any value of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ. Obviously, the topological number is: W=1𝑊1W=-1italic_W = - 1.

Considering the pressure Pr02=0.1𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟020.1Pr_{0}^{2}=0.1italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.1, the electric charge parameter q/r02=1𝑞superscriptsubscript𝑟021q/r_{0}^{2}=1italic_q / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1, two independent rotation parameters a/r0=1𝑎subscript𝑟01a/r_{0}=1italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 as well as b/r0=2𝑏subscript𝑟02b/r_{0}=2italic_b / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 for the five-dimensional double-rotating charged AdS black hole in minimal gauged supergravity theory, we plot the zero points of ϕrhsuperscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝑟\phi^{r_{h}}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in the rhτsubscript𝑟𝜏r_{h}-\tauitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_τ plane in Fig. 7, and the unit vector field n𝑛nitalic_n on a portion of the ΘrhΘsubscript𝑟\Theta-r_{h}roman_Θ - italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT plane with τ/r0=10𝜏subscript𝑟010\tau/r_{0}=10italic_τ / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 10 in Fig. 8. Indeed, there is only one thermodynamically unstable five-dimensional double-rotating charged AdS black hole in minimal gauged supergravity theory for whatever value of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ. In Fig. 8, one can observe that the zero point is located at (rh/r0,Θ)=(1.05,π/2)subscript𝑟subscript𝑟0Θ1.05𝜋2(r_{h}/r_{0},\Theta)=(1.05,\pi/2)( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Θ ) = ( 1.05 , italic_π / 2 ). Based on the local property of the zero point, we can easily obtain the topological number W=1𝑊1W=-1italic_W = - 1 for this black hole, which is different from that of the singly-rotating charged AdS case (W=1𝑊1W=1italic_W = 1) in the last subsection. This indicates that, in five-dimensional minimal gauged supergravity theory, the topological number for the rotating charged black holes is substantially influenced by the number of the rotation parameters.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: The arrows represent the unit vector field n𝑛nitalic_n on a portion of the rhΘsubscript𝑟Θr_{h}-\Thetaitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_Θ plane for the five-dimensional double-rotating charged AdS black hole in minimal gauged supergravity theory with τ/r0=10𝜏subscript𝑟010\tau/r_{0}=10italic_τ / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 10, a/r0=1𝑎subscript𝑟01a/r_{0}=1italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, b/r0=2𝑏subscript𝑟02b/r_{0}=2italic_b / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2, q/r02=1𝑞superscriptsubscript𝑟021q/r_{0}^{2}=1italic_q / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1, and Pr02=0.1𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟020.1Pr_{0}^{2}=0.1italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.1. The zero point (ZP) marked with a black dot is at (rh/r0,Θ)=(1.05,π/2)subscript𝑟subscript𝑟0Θ1.05𝜋2(r_{h}/r_{0},\Theta)=(1.05,\pi/2)( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Θ ) = ( 1.05 , italic_π / 2 ). The blue contour C𝐶Citalic_C is a closed loop enclosing the zero point.

IV.3 Double-rotating Kerr-AdS case

Refer to caption
Figure 9: Zero points of the vector ϕrhsuperscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝑟\phi^{r_{h}}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT shown in the rhτsubscript𝑟𝜏r_{h}-\tauitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_τ plane with a/r0=1𝑎subscript𝑟01a/r_{0}=1italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, b/r0=2𝑏subscript𝑟02b/r_{0}=2italic_b / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2, q=0𝑞0q=0italic_q = 0, and Pr02=0.1𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟020.1Pr_{0}^{2}=0.1italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.1. There is only one thermodynamically unstable five-dimensional double-rotating Kerr-AdS black hole for any value of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ. Obviously, the topological number is: W=1𝑊1W=-1italic_W = - 1.

In the following, in order to discuss the the effect of the charge parameter on the topological number, we consider the neutral double-rotating AdS black hole case, i.e., the five-dimensional double-rotating Kerr-AdS black hole case AP172-304 . Similar to the procedure adopted before, for the five-dimensional double-rotating Kerr-AdS black hole, we show the zero points of the component ϕrhsuperscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝑟\phi^{r_{h}}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with a/r0=1𝑎subscript𝑟01a/r_{0}=1italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, b/r0=2𝑏subscript𝑟02b/r_{0}=2italic_b / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2, q=0𝑞0q=0italic_q = 0, and Pr02=0.1𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟020.1Pr_{0}^{2}=0.1italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.1 in Fig. 9, and the unit vector field n𝑛nitalic_n on a portion of the ΘrhΘsubscript𝑟\Theta-r_{h}roman_Θ - italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT plane with τ/r0=10𝜏subscript𝑟010\tau/r_{0}=10italic_τ / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 10, a/r0=1𝑎subscript𝑟01a/r_{0}=1italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, b/r0=2𝑏subscript𝑟02b/r_{0}=2italic_b / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2, q=0𝑞0q=0italic_q = 0, and Pr02=0.1𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟020.1Pr_{0}^{2}=0.1italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.1 in Fig. 10, respectively. There is clearly only one thermodynamically unstable five-dimensional double-rotating Kerr-AdS black hole for all values of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ. The zero point can be observed at (rh/r0,Θ)=(0.88,π/2)subscript𝑟subscript𝑟0Θ0.88𝜋2(r_{h}/r_{0},\Theta)=(0.88,\pi/2)( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Θ ) = ( 0.88 , italic_π / 2 ) in Fig. 10. Hence, utilizing the local property of the zero point, one can simply determine the topological number W=1𝑊1W=-1italic_W = - 1 for the five-dimensional double-rotating Kerr-AdS black hole, which is different from that of the five-dimensional singly-rotating Kerr-AdS black hole (W=1𝑊1W=1italic_W = 1) PRD107-084002 . In addition, one can demonstrate that the electric charge parameter has no effect on the topological number of five-dimensional rotating AdS black holes due to the fact that the topological number of the five-dimensional double-rotating AdS black hole in gauged supergravity theory in the last subsection is W=1𝑊1W=-1italic_W = - 1.

Refer to caption
Figure 10: The arrows represent the unit vector field n𝑛nitalic_n on a portion of the rhΘsubscript𝑟Θr_{h}-\Thetaitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_Θ plane for the five-dimensional double-rotating Kerr-AdS black hole with τ/r0=10𝜏subscript𝑟010\tau/r_{0}=10italic_τ / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 10, a/r0=1𝑎subscript𝑟01a/r_{0}=1italic_a / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1, b/r0=2𝑏subscript𝑟02b/r_{0}=2italic_b / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2, q=0𝑞0q=0italic_q = 0, and Pr02=0.1𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑟020.1Pr_{0}^{2}=0.1italic_P italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.1. The zero point (ZP) marked with a black dot is at (rh/r0,Θ)=(0.88,π/2)subscript𝑟subscript𝑟0Θ0.88𝜋2(r_{h}/r_{0},\Theta)=(0.88,\pi/2)( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Θ ) = ( 0.88 , italic_π / 2 ). The blue contour C𝐶Citalic_C is a closed loop enclosing the zero point.

IV.4 Discussions

In this subsection, we aim to investigate why multiple electric charge parameters do not affect the topological number of five-dimensional double-rotating AdS black holes. By utilizing the definition of the vector ΨΨ\Psiroman_Ψ in Eq. (14) and solving the equation Ψrh=0superscriptΨsubscript𝑟0\Psi^{r_{h}}=0roman_Ψ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0, two critical pressure values are obtained as

Pc1=34πa2,Pc2=34πb2.formulae-sequencesubscript𝑃subscript𝑐134𝜋superscript𝑎2subscript𝑃subscript𝑐234𝜋superscript𝑏2P_{c_{1}}=\frac{3}{4\pi a^{2}}\,,\qquad P_{c_{2}}=\frac{3}{4\pi b^{2}}\,.italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_π italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_π italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (24)

Thus, the presence or absence of generation and annihilation points remains unaffected by the electric charge parameters. Moreover, as indicated in Ref. PRD107-084002 , the generation and annihilation points of the five-dimensional singly-rotating Kerr-AdS black hole emerge or vanish in pairs, and thus do not change its topological number. These findings are equally applicable to double-rotating charged AdS black holes in five-dimensional gauged supergravity theories.

V Conclusions

Table 1: The topological number W𝑊Witalic_W, numbers of generation and annihilation points for the four- and five-dimensional rotating charged AdS black holes in gauged supergravity.
BH solution W𝑊Witalic_W Generation point Annihilation point
4d rotating EMDA AdS BH 1 0 0
4d rotating pairwise-equal four-charge AdS BH 1 0 0
4d Kerr-AdS BH PRD107-084002 1 1 or 0 1or 0
4d Kerr-Newman-AdS BH PRD107-084002 1 1 or 0 1or 0
5d singly-rotating charged AdS BH 1 0 0
5d singly-rotating Kerr-AdS BH PRD107-084002 1 1 or 0 1or 0
5d double-rotating charged AdS BH -1 0 0
5d double-rotating Kerr-AdS BH -1 0 0

Combined ours with those in Ref. PRD107-084002 , Table 1 summarizes some interesting results.

In this paper, using the generalized off-shell Helmholtz free energy, we investigate the topological number of the four-dimensional rotating charged AdS black holes in gauged supergravity theory NPB717-246 for two different combinations of electric charge parameters, respectively. We have also adopted the same method to discuss the topological number of the five-dimensional rotating charged AdS black holes in minimal gauged supergravity theory PRL95-161301 by considering the singly- and double-rotating cases, respectively. In addition, in order to explore the the impact of the charge parameter on the topological number, we also consider the five-dimensional double-rotating Kerr-AdS black hole case. We find that, in four-dimensional gauged supergravity theory, the topological numbers of the rotating pairwise-equal four-charge AdS black hole and the rotating charged AdS black hole in EMDA gauged supergravity have both W=1𝑊1W=1italic_W = 1. What is more, we demonstrate that, in five-dimensional minimal gauged supergravity theory, the topological number of the singly-rotating charged AdS black hole is W=1𝑊1W=1italic_W = 1, while that of the double-rotating charged AdS black hole is W=1𝑊1W=-1italic_W = - 1. In addition, one can indicate that the topological number of the five-dimensional double-rotating Kerr-AdS black hole is also W=1𝑊1W=-1italic_W = - 1.

In this work, we have obtained two particularly exciting consequences: (i) the number of rotation parameters has an important effect on the topological numbers of five-dimensional rotating AdS black holes, and (ii) the number of the electric charge parameters does not contribute to the topological numbers of the four- and five-dimensional rotating AdS black holes. A most related issue is to investigate the topological numbers of black holes in some modified gravity theories, e.g., the scalar-tensor-vector gravity 2406.00579 , Kalb-Ramond gravity 2406.13461 ; 2407.07416 , etc.

Acknowledgements.
We are greatly indebted to the anonymous referee for his/her constructive comments to improve the presentation of this work. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grants No. 12205243, No. 12375053, No. 12205032, and No. 12275037, by the Sichuan Science and Technology Program under Grant No. 2023NSFSC1347, by the Program of Chongqing Human Resources and Social Security Bureau under Grant No. cx2021044, by the Doctoral Research Initiation Project of China West Normal University under Grant No. 21E028, and by the Talent Introduction Program of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications under Grant No. E012A2021209.

References