1 Introduction
Superconductivity is a state of matter characterized by the coexistence of zero resistivity and the Meissner effect [1 , 2 ] . The fundamental fundamental building block of the superconducting state is a boson formed by two electrons composing a pair bound by an attraction mechanism (e.g. a Cooper pair [3 ] ).
In the so-called “conventional” superconductors (typically metals) described by BCS theory [4 ] , the pairing mechanism originates from an effective attractive interaction between electrons mediated by phonons in the lattice.
There are, however, several examples of materials which exhibit a superconducting phase whose pairing mechanism is not of the type described by BCS theory. Examples of such “unconventional” superconductors include cuprate and iron pnictide materials, which can achieve critical temperatures (T c subscript 𝑇 𝑐 T_{c} italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) of up to 130 K [5 ] . The microscopic origin of unconventional superconductivity and the resulting “high T c subscript 𝑇 𝑐 T_{c} italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ” behavior are among the main unsolved problems in condensed matter physics.
Repulsive electron-electron interactions were suggested as the driving mechanism for pairing in these unconventional superconductors [6 ] .
For condensed matter purposes, electrons have three main properties: spin, charge, and momentum.
Therefore, interactions between electrons have both spin and charge parts, which cause fluctuations , in the ground state of the system, that are associated with a momentum transfer vector 𝒒 𝒒 \boldsymbol{q} bold_italic_q resulting from the difference between the momenta of two scattering Cooper pairs.
The earlier studies on the influence of spin fluctuations, causing 𝒒 = 0 𝒒 0 \boldsymbol{q}=0 bold_italic_q = 0 pair-scattering, showed that this channel was detrimental to the superconducting T c subscript 𝑇 𝑐 T_{c} italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of 3 3 {}^{3} start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT He [7 ] .
On the other hand, taking into account both spin and charge fluctuations, at 𝒒 ≠ 0 𝒒 0 \boldsymbol{q}\neq 0 bold_italic_q ≠ 0 , the effects of paramagnons were later shown to favor spin-triplet pairing in 3 3 {}^{3} start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT He [8 ] .
Paramagnons are short-lived and high-energy spin excitations occurring in materials that lack long-range magnetic order,
presenting some form of local magnetization instead. The realization of the importance
of paramagnons was already a harbinger of the role played by the occurrence of a
superconducting phase neighboring a magnetic phase in a series of future unconventional
superconductors.
The success of the electron-electron interaction theory of charge- and spin-fluctuation paramagnons motivated its investigation from the perspective of the Hubbard model [9 , 10 ] .
This model is expected to describe the metal-insulator transition, via doping, in the phase diagram of the cuprate superconductors, in which the spin fluctuations may account for the superconducting state (spin-singlet d 𝑑 d italic_d -wave) and the neighboring antiferromagnetic (AFM) state.
Subsequent works went beyond the Hubbard model, establishing spin and charge fluctuations as one of the main factors underlying the mechanism of unconventional superconductivity for the cuprates [11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ] .
Large off-site interactions were shown to favor charge instabilities in the Hubbard model [19 ] and in the extended Hubbard model [20 ] .
Meanwhile, the discovery of organic superconductors (T c subscript 𝑇 𝑐 T_{c} italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of up to 38 K [21 ] ) prompted research on charge and spin fluctuation models, including off-site interactions, which revealed possible spin-triplet states [22 , 23 ] .
Similarly, in the strontium ruthenate superconductors (T c subscript 𝑇 𝑐 T_{c} italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of up to 1.5 K [24 ] ), electron-electron interactions were used to predict the spin-triplet state [25 ] ,
and, more recently, were shown to describe the knight shift observed in this family [26 , 27 ] .
The sign-changing s 𝑠 s italic_s -wave superconducting symmetry was proposed to appear on iron-based superconductors (T c subscript 𝑇 𝑐 T_{c} italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of up to 55 K [28 ] ), in superconducting domes at the flanks of an AFM dome [29 , 30 ] .
Such prediction was experimentally observed later [31 ] .
More recently, spin and charge fluctuations were proposed to describe superconductivity in the nickelate family [32 ] , found to be in the class of high-temperature superconductors with a T c subscript 𝑇 𝑐 T_{c} italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of up to 80 K [33 ] .
Spin and charge fluctuations from electron-electron interactions are also proposed to yield the unconventional superconductivity and charge order of vanadium kagomé materials [34 ] .
These are multiband systems that require a careful track of the superconducting pairing symmetry, also called the superconducting pairing “fingerprint” [35 ] .
Finally, inspired by the paramagnon theory of 3 3 {}^{3} start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT He, it was proposed that magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene (MATBG) has its unconventional superconductivity caused by attractive intra-sublattice effective electronic interactions [35 , 36 ] .
The detailed structure of the interactions in MATBG were recently explored by the
current authors, revealing a possible transition from magnetic to superconducting to
magnetic state again, as the off-site interactions are tuned [37 ] .
A common thread for most of the materials mentioned above is their multiband influence on the superconducting and charge or magnetic orders. We argue, however, that the multiband character should
be decomposed into orbital and sublattice degrees of freedom.
The systems thought to have one relevant sublattice site are, for example, strontium ruthenate, and iron-based superconductors, while the cuprates and the nickelates have relevant oxygen orbitals in between the copper [38 ] or nickel atoms [32 ] , making them three-sublattice systems.
Insterestingly, all these materials share proposals of spin insulating states [39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ] .
Also, the vanadium kagomé and MATBG superconductors have three and two sublattice sites, respectively.
We show that the presence of more than one sublattice site is essential to the emergence of charge fluctuations and, consequently, charge orders, or spin-triplet superconductivity.
Indeed, some of these multisublattice systems host charge ordered states [43 , 44 , 45 ] .
On the other hand, it is believed that the cuprates need two orbitals on the copper sites and one in each oxygen [38 , 46 ] , the strontium ruthenates need at least three orbitals [25 ] , and the iron pnictides need at least five orbitals [29 ] to describe their low-energy properties, while for the nickelates single-orbital [47 ] and multiorbital [48 ] models are currently under debate [49 ] .
The vanadium kagomé superconductors need at least two orbitals to properly describe their non-interacting electronic properties [34 ] , while the MATBG has a superlattice decoupling of its effective orbitals [50 ] .
We conclude that a careful understanding of the influence of the orbital and sublattice degrees of freedom is essential to understand the phase diagrams of these systems, and to predict the phase diagrams of new correlated materials.
In this work, we build on the matrix random-phase approximation (RPA), which properly accounts for the RPA diagrams and also vertex corrections [51 ] , to describe models with multiple orbital and/or multiple sublattice degrees of freedom, including off-site Hubbard-like and exchange-like interactions, for any system with N s subscript 𝑁 𝑠 N_{s} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT sublattice sites and N o subscript 𝑁 𝑜 N_{o} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT orbitals.
We demonstrate that the number of matrix elements in the full four-body space, which in principle grows with the fourth power on the number of sublattice sites and orbitals N s 4 N o 4 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑠 4 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑜 4 N_{s}^{4}N_{o}^{4} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , can be reduced to a quadratic growth 3 N s 2 N o 2 − 2 N s 2 N o 3 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑠 2 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑜 2 2 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑠 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 3N_{s}^{2}N_{o}^{2}-2N_{s}^{2}N_{o} 3 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT by neglecting channels less important than the higher-order terms in perturbation theory and, therefore, cannot generate ordered states.
Our results indicate that systems without sublattice degree of freedom tend to be dominated by spin fluctuations, while the sublattice degree of freedom, when aligned with the multiorbital character, favors charge fluctuations.
Following the result by Berk and Schrieffer [7 ] , we show analytically that spin fluctuations are detrimental to the superconducting T c subscript 𝑇 𝑐 T_{c} italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT only if a zero momentum transfer peak dominates the pairing vertex, while finite momentum transfer only increases the pairing strength and, possibly, T c subscript 𝑇 𝑐 T_{c} italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
The increase in the pairing strength can yield strong-coupling superconductivity. In addition, we show that the dominant
bare susceptibility matrix element should lack the combination of inversion symmetry and a zero momentum transfer peak for the pairing vertex to hold a leading spin-triplet superconducting instability.
This paper is organized as follows:
In Sec. 2 we present the non-interacting model, the Hubbard-like and exchange-like interactions, which are renormalized by the matrix-RPA method in Sec. 3 ; in Sec. 4 we derive the analytical results based on linear algebra theorems and derive general conclusions on the influence of the number of orbitals and sublattice sites into the charge and spin fluctuations; in Sec 5 , we discuss the possible strong-coupling superconductivity scenarios in the many-body model.
We present our final conclusions in Sec. 6 .
2 Matrix-RPA formalism for multiorbital and multisublattice systems
In this section, we construct the basis of our orbital- and sublattice-dependent matrix-RPA approach.
We consider noninteracting H 0 subscript 𝐻 0 H_{0} italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (quadratic) and two-body interacting H int subscript 𝐻 int H_{\text{int}} italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT int end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (quartic) parts of the Hamiltonian H = H 0 + H int 𝐻 subscript 𝐻 0 subscript 𝐻 int H=H_{0}+H_{\text{int}} italic_H = italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT int end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , which will be further coupled in the matrix-RPA pairing vertex calculations (Sec. 3 ).
This coupling adds many-body effects to the treatment of the system.
The noninteracting Hamiltonian in real space is given by
H 0 = ∑ i j ∑ α β s p , σ t i j α s β p c i α s σ † c j β p σ , subscript 𝐻 0 subscript 𝑖 𝑗 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 𝑠 𝑝 𝜎
subscript superscript 𝑡 𝛼 𝑠 𝛽 𝑝 𝑖 𝑗 subscript superscript 𝑐 † 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 𝜎 subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑝 𝜎 H_{0}=\sum_{ij}\sum_{\alpha\beta sp,\sigma}t^{\alpha s\beta p}_{ij}c^{\dagger}%
_{i\alpha s\sigma}c_{j\beta p\sigma}, italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β italic_s italic_p , italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_β italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_p italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ,
(1)
where c i α s σ † subscript superscript 𝑐 † 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 𝜎 c^{\dagger}_{i\alpha s\sigma} italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (c i α s σ subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 𝜎 c_{i\alpha s\sigma} italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) creates (annihilates) an electron with spin σ 𝜎 \sigma italic_σ in the sublattice site α 𝛼 \alpha italic_α of the i 𝑖 i italic_i -th unit cell and in the orbital s 𝑠 s italic_s .
t α s β p superscript 𝑡 𝛼 𝑠 𝛽 𝑝 t^{\alpha s\beta p} italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_β italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the tunneling constant connecting different sublattice sites and orbitals.
There are s = 1 , 2 , 3 , … , N o 𝑠 1 2 3 … subscript 𝑁 𝑜
s=1,2,3,\ldots,N_{o} italic_s = 1 , 2 , 3 , … , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT orbitals and α = 1 , 2 , 3 , … , N s 𝛼 1 2 3 … subscript 𝑁 𝑠
\alpha=1,2,3,\ldots,N_{s} italic_α = 1 , 2 , 3 , … , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT sublattice sites, totaling N b = N o N s subscript 𝑁 𝑏 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 N_{b}=N_{o}N_{s} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT spin-degenerate bands.
In our formulation of multiorbital and multisublattice interaction theory we consider Hubbard-like and exchange-like interactions.
The Hubbard-like terms are of onsite (U 0 α α subscript 𝑈 subscript 0 𝛼 𝛼 U_{0_{\alpha\alpha}} italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) and long-range (U m α β subscript 𝑈 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 U_{m_{\alpha\beta}} italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , where the m α β subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 m_{\alpha\beta} italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT -th nearest-neighbor is such that m α β > 0 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 0 m_{\alpha\beta}>0 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0 ) type, such as the exchange-like onsite (J 0 α α subscript 𝐽 subscript 0 𝛼 𝛼 J_{0_{\alpha\alpha}} italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) and long-range (J m α β subscript 𝐽 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 J_{m_{\alpha\beta}} italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with m α β > 0 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 0 {m_{\alpha\beta}}>0 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0 ) terms.
We start by considering a two-body Hamiltonian
H int = ∑ i j ∑ α α ~ β β ~ ∑ s p t d , σ g ç i j α β V σ 1 σ 2 σ 3 σ 4 , i j α s α ~ p , β t β ~ d δ α α ~ δ β β ~ × c i α s σ 1 † c j β t σ 2 † c j β ~ d σ 3 c i α ~ p σ 4 ( δ σ 1 σ 3 δ σ 2 σ 4 + δ σ 2 σ 3 δ σ 1 σ 4 ) , subscript 𝐻 int subscript 𝑖 𝑗 subscript 𝛼 ~ 𝛼 𝛽 ~ 𝛽 subscript 𝑠 𝑝 𝑡 𝑑 subscript 𝜎 𝑔
subscript superscript ç 𝛼 𝛽 𝑖 𝑗 superscript subscript 𝑉 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝜎 4 𝑖 𝑗
𝛼 𝑠 ~ 𝛼 𝑝 𝛽 𝑡 ~ 𝛽 𝑑
subscript 𝛿 𝛼 ~ 𝛼 subscript 𝛿 𝛽 ~ 𝛽 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 † superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑡 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 𝑗 ~ 𝛽 𝑑 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝑐 𝑖 ~ 𝛼 𝑝 subscript 𝜎 4 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 4 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 4 \begin{split}H_{\text{int}}&=\sum_{ij}\sum_{\alpha\tilde{\alpha}\beta\tilde{%
\beta}}\sum_{sptd,\sigma_{g}}{\text{\c{c}}^{\alpha\beta}_{ij}}V_{\sigma_{1}%
\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}\sigma_{4},ij}^{\alpha s\tilde{\alpha}p,\beta t\tilde{%
\beta}d}\delta_{\alpha\tilde{\alpha}}\delta_{\beta\tilde{\beta}}\\
&\times c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta t\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{j%
\tilde{\beta}d\sigma_{3}}c_{i\tilde{\alpha}p\sigma_{4}}\left(\delta_{\sigma_{1%
}\sigma_{3}}\delta_{\sigma_{2}\sigma_{4}}+\delta_{\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}}\delta_%
{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{4}}\right)\;,\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT int end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α over~ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG italic_β over~ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p italic_t italic_d , italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ç start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s over~ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG italic_p , italic_β italic_t over~ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG italic_d end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α over~ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β over~ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL × italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_t italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j over~ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG italic_d italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i over~ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG italic_p italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) , end_CELL end_ROW
(2)
where s , p , t , d 𝑠 𝑝 𝑡 𝑑
s,p,t,d italic_s , italic_p , italic_t , italic_d are orbital indices, σ g subscript 𝜎 𝑔 \sigma_{g} italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are spin indices, and α , β , α ~ , β ~ 𝛼 𝛽 ~ 𝛼 ~ 𝛽
\alpha,\beta,\tilde{\alpha},\tilde{\beta} italic_α , italic_β , over~ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG , over~ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG are sublattice indices.
The real space Coulomb integrals V σ 1 σ 2 σ 3 σ 4 , i j α s α ~ p , β t , β ~ d superscript subscript 𝑉 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝜎 4 𝑖 𝑗
𝛼 𝑠 ~ 𝛼 𝑝 𝛽 𝑡 ~ 𝛽 𝑑
V_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}\sigma_{4},ij}^{\alpha s\tilde{\alpha}p,\beta
t%
,\tilde{\beta}d} italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s over~ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG italic_p , italic_β italic_t , over~ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG italic_d end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT consider up to w 𝑤 w italic_w nearest-neighbors. The delta functions in spin indices ensure spin conservation.
The factor ç i j α β subscript superscript ç 𝛼 𝛽 𝑖 𝑗 {\text{\c{c}}}^{\alpha\beta}_{ij} ç start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is present to avoid double counting over the exchange of spin indices s σ 1 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 s\sigma_{1} italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and t σ 2 𝑡 subscript 𝜎 2 t\sigma_{2} italic_t italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , and d σ 3 𝑑 subscript 𝜎 3 d\sigma_{3} italic_d italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and p σ 4 𝑝 subscript 𝜎 4 p\sigma_{4} italic_p italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT when α = β 𝛼 𝛽 \alpha=\beta italic_α = italic_β , and i = j 𝑖 𝑗 i=j italic_i = italic_j , in which case it takes the value ç i i α α = 1 / 4 subscript superscript ç 𝛼 𝛼 𝑖 𝑖 1 4 {\text{\c{c}}}^{\alpha\alpha}_{ii}=1/4 ç start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / 4 ,
and ç i j α β = 1 subscript superscript ç 𝛼 𝛽 𝑖 𝑗 1 {\text{\c{c}}}^{\alpha\beta}_{ij}=1 ç start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 otherwise.
In momentum space, the Coulomb integrals depend on a momentum transfer 𝒒 𝒒 \boldsymbol{q} bold_italic_q (omitted in the following notation, i.e., V σ 1 σ 2 σ 3 σ 4 α s α ~ p , β t , β ~ d superscript subscript 𝑉 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝜎 4 𝛼 𝑠 ~ 𝛼 𝑝 𝛽 𝑡 ~ 𝛽 𝑑
V_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}\sigma_{4}}^{\alpha s\tilde{\alpha}p,\beta t,%
\tilde{\beta}d} italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s over~ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG italic_p , italic_β italic_t , over~ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG italic_d end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) and they can be split into spin and charge parts [29 ]
V σ 1 σ 2 σ 3 σ 4 α s α ~ p , β t β ~ d = − 1 2 𝒱 β t β ~ d α s α ~ p 𝝈 σ 1 σ 4 ⋅ 𝝈 σ 2 σ 3 + 1 2 𝒰 β t β ~ d α s α ~ p δ σ 2 σ 3 δ σ 1 σ 4 , superscript subscript 𝑉 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝜎 4 𝛼 𝑠 ~ 𝛼 𝑝 𝛽 𝑡 ~ 𝛽 𝑑
⋅ 1 2 subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 ~ 𝛼 𝑝 𝛽 𝑡 ~ 𝛽 𝑑 subscript 𝝈 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 4 subscript 𝝈 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 1 2 subscript superscript 𝒰 𝛼 𝑠 ~ 𝛼 𝑝 𝛽 𝑡 ~ 𝛽 𝑑 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 4 \begin{split}V_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}\sigma_{4}}^{\alpha s\tilde{%
\alpha}p,\beta t\tilde{\beta}d}=&-\frac{1}{2}\mathcal{V}^{\alpha s\tilde{%
\alpha}p}_{\beta t\tilde{\beta}d}\boldsymbol{\sigma}_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{4}}%
\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma}_{\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}}\\
&+\frac{1}{2}\mathcal{U}^{\alpha s\tilde{\alpha}p}_{\beta t\tilde{\beta}d}%
\delta_{\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}}\delta_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{4}},\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s over~ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG italic_p , italic_β italic_t over~ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG italic_d end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = end_CELL start_CELL - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s over~ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_t over~ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ bold_italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s over~ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_t over~ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , end_CELL end_ROW
(3)
where 𝝈 σ 1 σ 4 subscript 𝝈 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 4 \boldsymbol{\sigma}_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{4}} bold_italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT denotes a Pauli vector. By identifying all the Hubbard-like and exchange-like terms in equation (2 ), one obtains the charge 𝒰 ^ ^ 𝒰 \hat{\mathcal{U}} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG and spin 𝒱 ^ ^ 𝒱 \hat{\mathcal{V}} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG interaction matrices.
These N b 2 × N b 2 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑏 2 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑏 2 N_{b}^{2}\times N_{b}^{2} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT matrices are given in terms of indices α s α ~ p , β t β ~ d 𝛼 𝑠 ~ 𝛼 𝑝 𝛽 𝑡 ~ 𝛽 𝑑
{\alpha s\tilde{\alpha}p,\beta t\tilde{\beta}d} italic_α italic_s over~ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG italic_p , italic_β italic_t over~ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG italic_d [29 , 34 ] and here we use a convenient basis by which these matrices turn out to be block diagonal.
Before proceeding, we define some useful quantities.
If the terms α , β 𝛼 𝛽
\alpha,\beta italic_α , italic_β denote different sublattice sites, the definition of the scalar U α α = ∑ m α α , l U m α α e i 𝜹 m α α , l ⋅ 𝒒 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛼 𝑙
subscript 𝑈 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛼 superscript 𝑒 ⋅ 𝑖 subscript 𝜹 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛼 𝑙
𝒒 U_{\alpha\alpha}=\sum_{m_{\alpha\alpha},l}U_{m_{\alpha\alpha}}e^{i\boldsymbol{%
\delta}_{m_{\alpha\alpha},l}\cdot\boldsymbol{q}} italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i bold_italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ bold_italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT includes same-sublattice interaction elements,
while U α β = 2 ∑ m α β , l U m α β e i 𝜹 m α β , l ⋅ 𝒒 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 2 subscript subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
subscript 𝑈 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 superscript 𝑒 ⋅ 𝑖 subscript 𝜹 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
𝒒 U_{\alpha\beta}=2\sum_{m_{\alpha\beta},l}U_{m_{\alpha\beta}}e^{i\boldsymbol{%
\delta}_{m_{\alpha\beta},l}\cdot\boldsymbol{q}} italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i bold_italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ bold_italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
includes different-sublattice elements, where 𝜹 m α α , l subscript 𝜹 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛼 𝑙
\boldsymbol{\delta}_{m_{\alpha\alpha},l} bold_italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (𝜹 m α β , l subscript 𝜹 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
\boldsymbol{\delta}_{m_{\alpha\beta},l} bold_italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) denotes the vector connecting same-sublattice (different-sublattice) m α α subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛼 m_{\alpha\alpha} italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT -th (m α β subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 m_{\alpha\beta} italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT -th) neighbors and l 𝑙 l italic_l is a m α α subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛼 m_{\alpha\alpha} italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (m α β subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 m_{\alpha\beta} italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )-dependent quantity that runs over the sites at the same distance.
We make analogous definitions for U α β ′ , J α β superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 ′ subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽
U_{\alpha\beta}^{\prime},J_{\alpha\beta} italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , and J α β ′ superscript subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 ′ J_{\alpha\beta}^{\prime} italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and, conveniently, M α β = − U α β ′ + 2 J α β subscript 𝑀 𝛼 𝛽 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 M_{\alpha\beta}=-U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}+2J_{\alpha\beta} italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and N α β = 2 U α β ′ − J α β subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛽 2 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 N_{\alpha\beta}=2U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}-J_{\alpha\beta} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
For example, the usual relation U m α β ′ = U m α β − 2 J m α β subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝑈 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 2 subscript 𝐽 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 U^{\prime}_{m_{\alpha\beta}}=U_{m_{\alpha\beta}}-2J_{m_{\alpha\beta}} italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 2 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [29 ] yields M α β = − U α β + 4 J α β subscript 𝑀 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 4 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 M_{\alpha\beta}=-U_{\alpha\beta}+4J_{\alpha\beta} italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 4 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and N α β = 2 U α β − 3 J α β subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛽 2 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 3 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 N_{\alpha\beta}=2U_{\alpha\beta}-3J_{\alpha\beta} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 3 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
Since U m α β subscript 𝑈 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 U_{m_{\alpha\beta}} italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is typically larger than J m α β subscript 𝐽 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 J_{m_{\alpha\beta}} italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , as the first depends on the square norm of the wave-functions, N m α β , U m α β ′ subscript 𝑁 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽
N_{m_{\alpha\beta}},U^{\prime}_{m_{\alpha\beta}} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are positive definite, while M m α β subscript 𝑀 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 M_{m_{\alpha\beta}} italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT can be either positive or negative, depending on material-specific properties. Reference [52 ] presents a thorough study of the properties of the Coulomb integrals in equation (2 ).
Thus, the charge interaction matrix takes the form (see A )
𝒰 ^ = [ 𝒰 ^ s s 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 𝒰 ^ s p 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ ] , 𝒰 ^ s s = [ 𝒰 ^ A A s s 𝒰 ^ A B s s 𝒰 ^ A C s s ⋯ 𝒰 ^ A B s s † 𝒰 ^ B B s s 𝒰 ^ B C s s ⋯ 𝒰 ^ A C s s † 𝒰 ^ B C s s † 𝒰 ^ C C s s ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ ] , formulae-sequence ^ 𝒰 matrix subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 matrix superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐴 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐵 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐶 𝑠 𝑠 ⋯ superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐵 𝑠 𝑠 †
superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐵 𝐵 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐵 𝐶 𝑠 𝑠 ⋯ superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐶 𝑠 𝑠 †
superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐵 𝐶 𝑠 𝑠 †
superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐶 𝐶 𝑠 𝑠 ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ \hat{\mathcal{U}}=\begin{bmatrix}\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}\\
\hat{0}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{sp}&\hat{0}\\
\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}\end{bmatrix},\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss}=\begin{bmatrix}%
\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AA}^{ss}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AB}^{ss}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AC}%
^{ss}&\cdots\\
\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AB}^{ss\dagger}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{BB}^{ss}&\hat{\mathcal{U%
}}_{BC}^{ss}&\cdots\\
\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AC}^{ss\dagger}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{BC}^{ss\dagger}&\hat{%
\mathcal{U}}_{CC}^{ss}&\cdots\\
\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\ddots\end{bmatrix}, over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] , over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋱ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ,
(4)
𝒰 ^ s p = diag ( 𝒰 ^ s p , … , 𝒰 ^ s p ) , 𝒰 ^ s p = [ 𝒰 ^ A A s p 𝒰 ^ A B s p 𝒰 ^ A C s p ⋯ 𝒰 ^ A B s p † 𝒰 ^ B B s p 𝒰 ^ B C s p ⋯ 𝒰 ^ A C s p † 𝒰 ^ B C s p † 𝒰 ^ C C s p ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ ] , formulae-sequence subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 diag superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 … superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 matrix superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐴 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐵 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐶 𝑠 𝑝 ⋯ superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐵 𝑠 𝑝 †
superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐵 𝐵 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐵 𝐶 𝑠 𝑝 ⋯ superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐶 𝑠 𝑝 †
superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐵 𝐶 𝑠 𝑝 †
superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐶 𝐶 𝑠 𝑝 ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ \hat{\mathcal{U}}_{sp}=\text{diag}(\hat{\mathcal{U}}^{sp},...,\hat{\mathcal{U}%
}^{sp}),\hat{\mathcal{U}}^{sp}=\begin{bmatrix}\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AA}^{sp}&\hat%
{\mathcal{U}}_{AB}^{sp}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AC}^{sp}&\cdots\\
\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AB}^{sp\dagger}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{BB}^{sp}&\hat{\mathcal{U%
}}_{BC}^{sp}&\cdots\\
\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AC}^{sp\dagger}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{BC}^{sp\dagger}&\hat{%
\mathcal{U}}_{CC}^{sp}&\cdots\\
\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\ddots\end{bmatrix}, over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = diag ( over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , … , over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋱ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ,
(5)
𝒰 ^ α α s s = [ U α α N α α N α α ⋯ N α α U α α N α α ⋯ N α α N α α U α α ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ ] , 𝒰 ^ α α s p = [ J α α ′ M α α M α α J α α ′ ] , formulae-sequence superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 matrix subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛼 ⋯ subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛼 ⋯ subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 matrix subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑀 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑀 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 \hat{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}=\begin{bmatrix}U_{\alpha\alpha}&N_{%
\alpha\alpha}&N_{\alpha\alpha}&\cdots\\
N_{\alpha\alpha}&U_{\alpha\alpha}&N_{\alpha\alpha}&\cdots\\
N_{\alpha\alpha}&N_{\alpha\alpha}&U_{\alpha\alpha}&\cdots\\
\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\ddots\end{bmatrix},\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}%
=\begin{bmatrix}J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}&M_{\alpha\alpha}\\
M_{\alpha\alpha}&J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}\end{bmatrix}, over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋱ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] , over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ,
(6)
𝒰 ^ α β s s = [ U α β U α β ′ U α β ′ ⋯ U α β ′ U α β U α β ′ ⋯ U α β ′ U α β ′ U α β ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ ] , 𝒰 ^ α β s p = [ J α β ′ J α β J α β J α β ′ ] . formulae-sequence superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝛼 𝛽 𝑠 𝑠 matrix subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 ⋯ subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 ⋯ subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝛼 𝛽 𝑠 𝑝 matrix subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 \hat{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha\beta}^{ss}=\begin{bmatrix}U_{\alpha\beta}&U^{\prime}%
_{\alpha\beta}&U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}&\cdots\\
U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}&U_{\alpha\beta}&U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}&\cdots\\
U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}&U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}&U_{\alpha\beta}&\cdots\\
\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\ddots\end{bmatrix},\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha\beta}^{sp}=%
\begin{bmatrix}J^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}&J_{\alpha\beta}\\
J_{\alpha\beta}&J^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}\end{bmatrix}. over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋱ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] , over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] .
(7)
In the above, 𝒰 ^ ^ 𝒰 \hat{\mathcal{U}} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG has dimension N b 2 × N b 2 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑏 2 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑏 2 N_{b}^{2}\times N_{b}^{2} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , while 𝒰 ^ s s subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 \hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is an N b × N b subscript 𝑁 𝑏 subscript 𝑁 𝑏 N_{b}\times N_{b} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT matrix containing matrix elements in the α s α s 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 \alpha s\alpha s italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s subspace, where the orbital index s 𝑠 s italic_s runs first for each sublattice α 𝛼 \alpha italic_α .
We call 𝒰 ^ s s subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 \hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT orbital density-density block.
𝒰 ^ α α s s , 𝒰 ^ α β s s superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝛼 𝛽 𝑠 𝑠
\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss},\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha\beta}^{ss} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are N o × N o subscript 𝑁 𝑜 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 N_{o}\times N_{o} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT matrices.
𝒰 ^ s p subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 \hat{\mathcal{U}}_{sp} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is an N b ( N o − 1 ) × N b ( N o − 1 ) subscript 𝑁 𝑏 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 subscript 𝑁 𝑏 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 N_{b}(N_{o}-1)\times N_{b}(N_{o}-1) italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) × italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) containing α s α p 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑝 \alpha s\alpha p italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_p indices for s ≠ p 𝑠 𝑝 s\neq p italic_s ≠ italic_p , where the indices s , p 𝑠 𝑝
s,p italic_s , italic_p run first for each α 𝛼 \alpha italic_α [the dimension is obtained noticing that there are N o ( N o − 1 ) subscript 𝑁 𝑜 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 N_{o}(N_{o}-1) italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) orbital permutations and N s subscript 𝑁 𝑠 N_{s} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT sites].
In analogy to the density-density nomenclature [29 ] , refer to 𝒰 ^ s p subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 \hat{\mathcal{U}}_{sp} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as the “orbital current-current” block, because the interacting electrons are tunneling between orbitals (s ≠ p 𝑠 𝑝 s\neq p italic_s ≠ italic_p ) in these matrix elements.
𝒰 ^ s p superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 \hat{\mathcal{U}}^{sp} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is a 2 N s × 2 N s 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 2N_{s}\times 2N_{s} 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT matrix and there are N o ( N o − 1 ) / 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 2 N_{o}(N_{o}-1)/2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) / 2 of those matrices (over two because each matrix includes two permutations of orbital indices).
𝒰 ^ α α s p , 𝒰 ^ α β s p superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝛼 𝛽 𝑠 𝑝
\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp},\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha\beta}^{sp} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are 2 × 2 2 2 2\times 2 2 × 2 matrices composed by each s , p 𝑠 𝑝
s,p italic_s , italic_p exchange in the basis, i.e. , α s α p 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑝 \alpha s\alpha p italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_p and α p α s 𝛼 𝑝 𝛼 𝑠 \alpha p\alpha s italic_α italic_p italic_α italic_s .
Analogously to the charge case, the spin interaction matrix is given by (see A )
𝒱 ^ ^ 𝒱 \displaystyle\hat{\mathcal{V}} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG
= [ 𝒱 ^ s s 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 𝒱 ^ s p 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ ] , 𝒱 ^ s s = [ 𝒱 ^ A A s s 0 ^ 0 ^ ⋯ 0 ^ 𝒱 ^ B B s s 0 ^ ⋯ 0 ^ 0 ^ 𝒱 ^ C C s s ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ ] , formulae-sequence absent matrix subscript ^ 𝒱 𝑠 𝑠 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 subscript ^ 𝒱 𝑠 𝑝 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 subscript ^ 𝒱 𝑠 𝑠 matrix superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝐴 𝐴 𝑠 𝑠 ^ 0 ^ 0 ⋯ ^ 0 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝐵 𝐵 𝑠 𝑠 ^ 0 ⋯ ^ 0 ^ 0 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝐶 𝐶 𝑠 𝑠 ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ \displaystyle=\begin{bmatrix}\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{ss}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}\\
\hat{0}&\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{sp}&\hat{0}\\
\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}\end{bmatrix},\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{ss}=\begin{bmatrix}%
\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{AA}^{ss}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\cdots\\
\hat{0}&\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{BB}^{ss}&\hat{0}&\cdots\\
\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{CC}^{ss}&\cdots\\
\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\ddots\end{bmatrix}, = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] , over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋱ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ,
(15)
𝒱 ^ s p subscript ^ 𝒱 𝑠 𝑝 \displaystyle\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{sp} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
= diag ( 𝒱 ^ s p , … , 𝒱 ^ s p ) , 𝒱 ^ s p = [ 𝒱 ^ A A s p 0 ^ 0 ^ ⋯ 0 ^ 𝒱 ^ B B s p 0 ^ ⋯ 0 ^ 0 ^ 𝒱 ^ C C s p ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ ] , formulae-sequence absent diag superscript ^ 𝒱 𝑠 𝑝 … superscript ^ 𝒱 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝒱 𝑠 𝑝 matrix superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝐴 𝐴 𝑠 𝑝 ^ 0 ^ 0 ⋯ ^ 0 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝐵 𝐵 𝑠 𝑝 ^ 0 ⋯ ^ 0 ^ 0 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝐶 𝐶 𝑠 𝑝 ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ \displaystyle=\text{diag}(\hat{\mathcal{V}}^{sp},...,\hat{\mathcal{V}}^{sp}),%
\hat{\mathcal{V}}^{sp}=\begin{bmatrix}\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{AA}^{sp}&\hat{0}&\hat%
{0}&\cdots\\
\hat{0}&\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{BB}^{sp}&\hat{0}&\cdots\\
\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{CC}^{sp}&\cdots\\
\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\ddots\end{bmatrix}, = diag ( over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , … , over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋱ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ,
(20)
𝒱 ^ α α s s superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 \displaystyle\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
= [ U α α J α α J α α ⋯ J α α U α α J α α ⋯ J α α J α α U α α ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ ] , 𝒱 ^ α α s p = [ J α α ′ U α α ′ U α α ′ J α α ′ ] . formulae-sequence absent matrix subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 ⋯ subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 ⋯ subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 matrix subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 \displaystyle=\begin{bmatrix}U_{\alpha\alpha}&J_{\alpha\alpha}&J_{\alpha\alpha%
}&\cdots\\
J_{\alpha\alpha}&U_{\alpha\alpha}&J_{\alpha\alpha}&\cdots\\
J_{\alpha\alpha}&J_{\alpha\alpha}&U_{\alpha\alpha}&\cdots\\
\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\ddots\end{bmatrix},\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}%
=\begin{bmatrix}J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}&U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}\\
U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}&J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}\end{bmatrix}. = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋱ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] , over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] .
(27)
The full interaction space has dimension N b 2 × N b 2 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑏 2 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑏 2 N_{b}^{2}\times N_{b}^{2} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , which means N b 4 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑏 4 N_{b}^{4} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT momentum integrals performed to compute the bare susceptibility, as further discussed in Sec. 3 .
This growth is too computationally expensive in terms of number of bands.
However, we further show that the interaction matrices multiply the susceptibility in the pairing vertex, resulting in only two blocks with non-zero elements, one of dimension N b × N b subscript 𝑁 𝑏 subscript 𝑁 𝑏 N_{b}\times N_{b} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (𝒰 ^ s s subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 \hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) and the other of dimension N b ( N o − 1 ) × N b ( N o − 1 ) subscript 𝑁 𝑏 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 subscript 𝑁 𝑏 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 N_{b}(N_{o}-1)\times N_{b}(N_{o}-1) italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) × italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) (𝒰 ^ s p subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 \hat{\mathcal{U}}_{sp} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), where the latter has the structure of N o ( N o − 1 ) / 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 2 N_{o}(N_{o}-1)/2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) / 2 non-zero blocks 𝒰 ^ s p superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 \hat{\mathcal{U}}^{sp} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT of dimension 2 N s × 2 N s 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 2N_{s}\times 2N_{s} 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
This reduces the pairing vertex non-zero elements from N b 4 = N s 4 N o 4 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑏 4 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑠 4 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑜 4 N_{b}^{4}=N_{s}^{4}N_{o}^{4} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT to N s 2 N o 2 + 2 N s 2 ( N o 2 − N o ) = 3 N s 2 N o 2 − 2 N s 2 N o superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑠 2 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑜 2 2 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑠 2 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑜 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 3 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑠 2 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑜 2 2 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑠 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 N_{s}^{2}N_{o}^{2}+2N_{s}^{2}(N_{o}^{2}-N_{o})=3N_{s}^{2}N_{o}^{2}-2N_{s}^{2}N%
_{o} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = 3 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
Under the approximation that the other zero terms on the interaction matrices cannot generate divergences on the susceptibilities, we conclude that the number of computations grows quadratically and not quartically as one would expect.
4 Exact results for the Stoner parameters
In order to express the possible fluctuation scenarios resulting from the spin-charge competition, we consider some simplifications and then derive bounds for the maximum spin and charge Stoner parameters.
If a matrix has real eigenvalues, the maximum eigenvalue is bounded by the deviation, given by the variance, from the trace of the matrix averaged over the space dimension (see Theorem 2.1 in
Ref. [61 ] ).
The main assumption of this formal result is that Eqs. (34 ) must have only real eigenvalues, which is always true.
Aiming to obtain comprehensive analytical results, we define the susceptibility under the diagonal approximation [30 ] in the same basis as the spin and charge matrices.
We further simplify the bare susceptibility by considering all orbital density-density terms and, in parallel, all orbital current-current terms as being the same, taking some characteristic value representing the most diverging bare susceptibility matrix element in each one of these two matrix blocks.
We show the full derivation of the bounds in B and summarize the results in Table 1 .
Table 1: Analytical results for the bounds of the charge and spin Stoner parameters α c subscript 𝛼 𝑐 \alpha_{c} italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and α s subscript 𝛼 𝑠 \alpha_{s} italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , respectively. Here, we show the conditions for which either the spin or charge fluctuations completely dominate the fluctuation scenario. The scattering momentum is taken as the nesting vector.
Table 1 shows the conditions for the charge (spin) channel to lead over the spin (charge) channel, max α c ( s ) > max α s ( c ) subscript 𝛼 𝑐 𝑠 subscript 𝛼 𝑠 𝑐 \max\alpha_{c(s)}>\max\alpha_{s(c)} roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c ( italic_s ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s ( italic_c ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , when the same-sublattice orbital density-density χ α α s s subscript superscript 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 𝛼 𝛼 \chi^{ss}_{\alpha\alpha} italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT or the same-sublattice orbital current-current χ α α s p subscript superscript 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 𝛼 𝛼 \chi^{sp}_{\alpha\alpha} italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bare susceptibility channel dominates the fluctuation scenario, i.e., it diverges first when interactions are
turned on.
Notice that the maximum value has an explicit dependence on the number of orbitals N o subscript 𝑁 𝑜 N_{o} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and sublattice sites N s subscript 𝑁 𝑠 N_{s} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as well as bands N b = N o N s subscript 𝑁 𝑏 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 N_{b}=N_{o}N_{s} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
In general, the interplay scenario, where the bounds for spin and charge Stoner parameters intersect, is favored when the number of orbitals and sublattice sites are large.
For example, when N o = N s = 1 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 1 N_{o}=N_{s}=1 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 , the spin fluctuations always dominate over the charge ones.
As the number of orbitals increases, but only one sublattice site is kept, the dimension of the matrices increases, thus the bounds get wider, losing precision, but still the upper bound for the spin fluctuations remains higher than the charge one (see B ).
This suggests that spin fluctuations tend to dominate over charge fluctuations in systems without a sublattice degree of freedom.
Examples of this trend are the cuprates [62 , 63 , 55 ] and iron pnictides [29 ] .
The first one is believed to be a three-orbital system, while the second, a five-orbital one, but in both the dominant phase,
close to the superconducting one, is antiferromagnetic.
Table 2: Number of neighbors of an A 𝐴 A italic_A sublattice site for different lattice geometries.
A A 𝐴 𝐴 AA italic_A italic_A denotes same-sublattice and A B , A C 𝐴 𝐵 𝐴 𝐶
AB,AC italic_A italic_B , italic_A italic_C the different-sublattice neighbors.
The distance D w = 5 subscript 𝐷 𝑤 5 D_{w\!=\!5} italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w = 5 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to the farthest unit cell within the w = 5 𝑤 5 w=5 italic_w = 5 nearest neighbor for each of these lattice geometries depends on the number of sublattice sites.
On the other hand, as the number of sublattice sites and orbitals increases, the charge fluctuations become more important than the spin fluctuations, depending on the lattice geometry.
As seen in Table 1 , to have the condition max α c > max α s subscript 𝛼 𝑐 subscript 𝛼 𝑠 \max\alpha_{c}>\max\alpha_{s} roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT fulfilled, one must add more sublattice sites to make the sublattice summation larger.
However, U α α subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 U_{\alpha\alpha} italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are typically larger than U α β subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 U_{\alpha\beta} italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , because of the onsite term inside the first, such that one also needs a multiorbital system to have nonzero U α β ′ subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta} italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , guaranteeing charge dominance.
In their turn, the terms U α β , U α β ′ , J α β , J α β ′ subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 ′ subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 ′
U_{\alpha\beta},U_{\alpha\beta}^{\prime},J_{\alpha\beta},J_{\alpha\beta}^{\prime} italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT grow with the number of neighbors at each constant distance 𝒓 i α , j β subscript 𝒓 𝑖 𝛼 𝑗 𝛽
\boldsymbol{r}_{i\alpha,j\beta} bold_italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α , italic_j italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT between sublattice site α 𝛼 \alpha italic_α at lattice site i 𝑖 i italic_i and sublattice site β 𝛽 \beta italic_β at lattice site j 𝑗 j italic_j , where α ≠ β 𝛼 𝛽 \alpha\neq\beta italic_α ≠ italic_β .
For example, up to w = 5 𝑤 5 w=5 italic_w = 5 nearest-neighbors, the number of different-sublattice neighbors of the hexagonal lattice is equal to the same-sublattice number of neighbors, as shown in table 2 .
The three-sublattice square lattice (for example, when also
considering oxygen in the cuprates) shows more different-sublattice sites than same-sublattice sites, as it is also the case in the kagomé
lattice.
In summary, there are three distinct situations in terms of the interplay between spin and charge fluctuations, which we depict in figure 2 .
The situation shown in figure 2 (a), where the spin fluctuations dominate over the charge fluctuations, is favored when either
the number of sublattice sites or orbitals is low (notice that more sublattice sites N s subscript 𝑁 𝑠 N_{s} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and orbitals N o subscript 𝑁 𝑜 N_{o} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT increase terms at right-hand side of the max α s > max α c subscript 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝛼 𝑐 \max\alpha_{s}>\max\alpha_{c} roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT inequalities in table 1 ).
Figure 2 (b) presents the scenario where the charge fluctuations dominate, which might happen when there are enough sublattice sites and more than one orbital (notice that the left-hand side of the max α c > max α s subscript 𝛼 𝑐 subscript 𝛼 𝑠 \max\alpha_{c}>\max\alpha_{s} roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT inequalities is favored by intersublattice | U α β | subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 |U_{\alpha\beta}| | italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | and intersublattice+interorbital | U α β ′ | superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 ′ |U_{\alpha\beta}^{\prime}| | italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | interactions).
However, a lattice geometry-dependent limit cannot be exceeded, because the number of orbitals favors the spin fluctuations the most (max α s > max α c subscript 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝛼 𝑐 \max\alpha_{s}>\max\alpha_{c} roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT inequalities) as the upper limit of max α s subscript 𝛼 𝑠 \max\alpha_{s} roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT grows faster with the number of orbitals.
The need for off-site interactions to generate charge order has been discussed for the two-sublattice sites θ 𝜃 \theta italic_θ -type organic superconductors [64 , 65 ] , in contrast to the onsite result, where spin fluctuations dominate [22 ] .
That can be attributed to the fact these calculations consider higher number of neighbors, in the triangular lattice, in comparison to the square lattice (table 2 ), increasing the U α β subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 U_{\alpha\beta} italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT on the bounds shown in table 1 .
However, this phenomenon is more pronounced when considering more than one orbital.
Finally, the increasing number of both sublattice sites and
orbitals can favor a scenario where the charge fluctuation bounds
become wider, while the increasing number of orbitals broadens
both spin and charge fluctuation bounds.
In this case, the charge and spin fluctuations can compete
and may cause both a suppression or an excessive increase of fluctuations, such that an ordered spin or charge ground-state is achieved [figure 2 (c)].
The consequences of the spin-charge transition are essential for the underlying pairing mechanism driving superconductivity in the system. Indeed,
as seen in equation (36 ), the spin-singlet pairing vertex has a repulsive ζ S = 3 / 2 subscript 𝜁 𝑆 3 2 \zeta_{S}=3/2 italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3 / 2 factor on the spin susceptibility, while the spin-triplet solution has an attractive factor ζ T = − 1 / 2 subscript 𝜁 𝑇 1 2 \zeta_{T}=-1/2 italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 1 / 2 .
On the other hand, the charge part has the same attractive factor − 1 / 2 1 2 -1/2 - 1 / 2 for both singlet and triplet cases.
Repulsive singlet states (ζ T = 3 / 2 subscript 𝜁 𝑇 3 2 \zeta_{T}=3/2 italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3 / 2 ) are thus favored by dominating spin fluctuations, in contrast to charge fluctuations that favor the attractive triplet states over the singlet states because of the negative sign of both spin and charge fluctuations (ζ T = − 1 / 2 subscript 𝜁 𝑇 1 2 \zeta_{T}=-1/2 italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 1 / 2 ).
Therefore, multiorbital and multisublattice systems that favor charge fluctuations over spin fluctuations are more likely to be spin-triplet
superconductors.
Thus, transitions from singlet to triplet might be possible under tuning of interactions, changing the bounds in Table 1 .
Another possibility is to have a competition between spin and charge fluctuations [figure 2 (c)], possibly causing a competition between spin-singlet and spin-triplet superconducting symmetries.
As previously discussed, this situation can suppress both spin and charge fluctuations, lowering the pairing strength and, consequently, T c subscript 𝑇 𝑐 T_{c} italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
This means that the spin singlet and triplet competition is possibly detrimental to superconductivity [66 ] .
Figure 2:
Possible scenarios of interplay between charge and spin fluctuations. Panels (a)-(c) show the interval of possible main charge or spin Stoner parameters. The cases derived analytically consist in panels (a) and (b), while their simultaneous breaking is represented in panel (c).
The vertical grey dashed line marks the divergence of the pairing vertex and, consequently, the entrance in an ordered state in the particle-hole channel.
Appendix A Interaction matrices in matrix-RPA theory
In Sec. 2 , we have shown the interaction matrices for general multiorbital and multisublattice systems with Hubbard-like and exchange-like interactions.
In this supplementary material, we present the procedure to derive those matrices, which we believe are of interest for new researches in the field, which are interested in using the matrix-RPA method.
Modeling Hubbard-like and exchange-like interactions requires one imposing to equation (2 ) only inter-site interactions with density-density terms, and sublattice structure degrees of freedom.
The specific Hamiltonian then reads
H int = ∑ i j ∑ α β , s σ ∑ m α β U m α β n i α s ↑ n j β s ↓ + ∑ i j ∑ α β , p < s ∑ m α β U m α β ′ n i α p n j β s + ∑ i j ∑ α β , s < p , σ σ ′ ∑ m α β J m α β c i α s σ † c j β p σ ′ † c j α s σ ′ c i β p σ + ∑ i j ∑ α β , s ≠ p , σ σ ′ ∑ m α β J m α β ′ c i α a ↑ † c j β p ↓ † c j α s ↓ c i β p ↑ . subscript 𝐻 int subscript 𝑖 𝑗 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 𝑠 𝜎
subscript subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝑈 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝑛 ↑ 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 absent subscript 𝑛 ↓ 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 absent subscript 𝑖 𝑗 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 𝑝
𝑠 subscript subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝑛 𝑖 𝛼 𝑝 subscript 𝑛 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝑖 𝑗 subscript formulae-sequence 𝛼 𝛽 𝑠
𝑝 𝜎 superscript 𝜎 ′ subscript subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝐽 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 𝜎 † superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑝 superscript 𝜎 ′ † subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛼 𝑠 superscript 𝜎 ′ subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛽 𝑝 𝜎 subscript 𝑖 𝑗 subscript formulae-sequence 𝛼 𝛽 𝑠
𝑝 𝜎 superscript 𝜎 ′ subscript subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript 𝑐 ↑ 𝑖 𝛼 𝑎 absent † superscript subscript 𝑐 ↓ 𝑗 𝛽 𝑝 absent † subscript 𝑐 ↓ 𝑗 𝛼 𝑠 absent subscript 𝑐 ↑ 𝑖 𝛽 𝑝 absent \begin{split}H_{\text{int}}=&\sum_{ij}\sum_{\alpha\beta,s\sigma}\sum_{m_{%
\alpha\beta}}U_{m_{\alpha\beta}}n_{i\alpha s\uparrow}n_{j\beta s\downarrow}\\
&+\sum_{ij}\sum_{\alpha\beta,p<s}\sum_{m_{\alpha\beta}}U^{\prime}_{m_{\alpha%
\beta}}n_{i\alpha p}n_{j\beta s}\\
&+\sum_{ij}\sum_{\alpha\beta,s<p,\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}\sum_{m_{\alpha\beta}}J%
_{m_{\alpha\beta}}c_{i\alpha s\sigma}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta p\sigma^{\prime}}^{%
\dagger}c_{j\alpha s\sigma^{\prime}}c_{i\beta p\sigma}\\
&+\sum_{ij}\sum_{\alpha\beta,s\neq p,\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}\sum_{m_{\alpha%
\beta}}J^{\prime}_{m_{\alpha\beta}}c_{i\alpha a\uparrow}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta p%
\downarrow}^{\dagger}c_{j\alpha s\downarrow}c_{i\beta p\uparrow}.\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT int end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = end_CELL start_CELL ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β , italic_s italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s ↑ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s ↓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β , italic_p < italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β , italic_s < italic_p , italic_σ italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_p italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_β italic_p italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β , italic_s ≠ italic_p , italic_σ italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_a ↑ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_p ↓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_α italic_s ↓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_β italic_p ↑ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . end_CELL end_ROW
(41)
Here, s , p , t , d 𝑠 𝑝 𝑡 𝑑
s,p,t,d italic_s , italic_p , italic_t , italic_d are orbital indices, σ / σ ′ 𝜎 superscript 𝜎 ′ \sigma/\sigma^{\prime} italic_σ / italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT spin indices, α / β 𝛼 𝛽 \alpha/\beta italic_α / italic_β are sublattice indices, and { m α β } subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 \{m_{\alpha\beta}\} { italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } denotes all the w 𝑤 w italic_w nearest-neighbors considered in the interaction (m α β = 0 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 0 m_{\alpha\beta}=0 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 denotes onsite sublattice structure).
Also, n i α s = n i α s ↑ + n i α s ↓ subscript 𝑛 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝑛 ↑ 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 absent subscript 𝑛 ↓ 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 absent n_{i\alpha s}=n_{i\alpha s\uparrow}+n_{i\alpha s\downarrow} italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s ↑ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s ↓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , where n i α s ↑ = c i α s ↑ † c i α s ↑ subscript 𝑛 ↑ 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 absent subscript superscript 𝑐 † ↑ 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 absent subscript 𝑐 ↑ 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 absent n_{i\alpha s\uparrow}=c^{\dagger}_{i\alpha s\uparrow}c_{i\alpha s\uparrow} italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s ↑ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s ↑ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s ↑ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the sublattice and orbital density operator.
Next, we expand the orbital summation in equation (2 ) noticing that a conservation of spin condition in present, namely σ 1 = σ 4 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 4 \sigma_{1}=\sigma_{4} italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and σ 2 = σ 3 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 \sigma_{2}=\sigma_{3} italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , or σ 1 = σ 3 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 3 \sigma_{1}=\sigma_{3} italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and σ 2 = σ 4 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 4 \sigma_{2}=\sigma_{4} italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT should be the only remaining elements.
In addition, we to separate spin and charge terms [equation (3 )] using the following identity of Pauli matrices [29 ] :
𝝈 σ 1 σ 4 ⋅ 𝝈 σ 2 σ 3 = 2 δ σ 1 σ 3 δ σ 2 σ 4 − δ σ 1 σ 4 δ σ 2 σ 3 ⋅ subscript 𝝈 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 4 subscript 𝝈 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 2 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 4 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 4 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 \boldsymbol{\sigma}_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{4}}\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma}_{\sigma_{2}%
\sigma_{3}}=2\delta_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{3}}\delta_{\sigma_{2}\sigma_{4}}-\delta%
_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{4}}\delta_{\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}} bold_italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ bold_italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
(42)
to define the spin part of the interaction Hamiltonian.
In its turn, the charge component should resemble terms of the type
∑ i ≠ j n i α n j β = ∑ i ≠ j ( ∑ s σ c i α s σ † c i α s σ ) ( ∑ p σ ′ c j β p σ ′ † c j β p σ ′ ) = ∑ i ≠ j ∑ s p , σ σ ′ c i α s σ † c i α s σ c j β p σ ′ † c j β p , σ ′ = ∑ i ≠ j ∑ s p , σ σ ′ c i α s σ † c j β p , σ ′ † c j β p σ ′ c i α s σ , subscript 𝑖 𝑗 subscript 𝑛 𝑖 𝛼 subscript 𝑛 𝑗 𝛽 subscript 𝑖 𝑗 subscript 𝑠 𝜎 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 𝜎 † subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 𝜎 subscript 𝑝 superscript 𝜎 ′ superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑝 superscript 𝜎 ′ † subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑝 superscript 𝜎 ′ subscript 𝑖 𝑗 subscript 𝑠 𝑝 𝜎 superscript 𝜎 ′
superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 𝜎 † subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 𝜎 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑝 superscript 𝜎 ′ † subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑝 superscript 𝜎 ′
subscript 𝑖 𝑗 subscript 𝑠 𝑝 𝜎 superscript 𝜎 ′
superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 𝜎 † superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑝 superscript 𝜎 ′
† subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑝 superscript 𝜎 ′ subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 𝜎 \begin{split}\sum_{i\neq j}n_{i\alpha}n_{j\beta}&=\sum_{i\neq j}\left(\sum_{s%
\sigma}c_{i\alpha s\sigma}^{\dagger}c_{i\alpha s\sigma}\right)\left(\sum_{p%
\sigma^{\prime}}c_{j\beta p\sigma^{\prime}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta p\sigma^{\prime%
}}\right)\\
&=\sum_{i\neq j}\sum_{sp,\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}c_{i\alpha s\sigma}^{\dagger}c_%
{i\alpha s\sigma}c_{j\beta p\sigma^{\prime}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta p,\sigma^{%
\prime}}\\
&=\sum_{i\neq j}\sum_{sp,\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}c_{i\alpha s\sigma}^{\dagger}c_%
{j\beta p,\sigma^{\prime}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta p\sigma^{\prime}}c_{i\alpha s%
\sigma},\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ≠ italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ≠ italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_p italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_p italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ≠ italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p , italic_σ italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_p italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_p , italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ≠ italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p , italic_σ italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_p , italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_p italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , end_CELL end_ROW
(43)
that is, the charge component shows spin indices δ σ 1 σ 4 δ σ 2 σ 3 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 4 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 \delta_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{4}}\delta_{\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}} italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
After some manipulation, equation (3 ) becomes [29 ]
V σ 1 σ 2 σ 3 σ 4 α s α ~ p , β t β ~ d = − 𝒱 β t β ~ d α s α ~ p δ σ 1 σ 3 δ σ 2 σ 4 + 1 2 ( 𝒰 β t β ~ d α s α ~ p + 𝒱 β t β ~ d α s α ~ p ) δ σ 2 σ 3 δ σ 1 σ 4 . superscript subscript 𝑉 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝜎 4 𝛼 𝑠 ~ 𝛼 𝑝 𝛽 𝑡 ~ 𝛽 𝑑
subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 ~ 𝛼 𝑝 𝛽 𝑡 ~ 𝛽 𝑑 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 4 1 2 subscript superscript 𝒰 𝛼 𝑠 ~ 𝛼 𝑝 𝛽 𝑡 ~ 𝛽 𝑑 subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 ~ 𝛼 𝑝 𝛽 𝑡 ~ 𝛽 𝑑 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 4 \begin{split}V_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}\sigma_{4}}^{\alpha s\tilde{%
\alpha}p,\beta t\tilde{\beta}d}=&-\mathcal{V}^{\alpha s\tilde{\alpha}p}_{\beta
t%
\tilde{\beta}d}\delta_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{3}}\delta_{\sigma_{2}\sigma_{4}}\\
&+\frac{1}{2}\left(\mathcal{U}^{\alpha s\tilde{\alpha}p}_{\beta t\tilde{\beta}%
d}+\mathcal{V}^{\alpha s\tilde{\alpha}p}_{\beta t\tilde{\beta}d}\right)\delta_%
{\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}}\delta_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{4}}.\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s over~ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG italic_p , italic_β italic_t over~ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG italic_d end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = end_CELL start_CELL - caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s over~ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_t over~ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s over~ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_t over~ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s over~ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_t over~ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . end_CELL end_ROW
(44)
Now, having the interactions separated into the two main electron properties for condensed matter, charge and spin parts, we move to fing the the charge 𝒰 ^ ^ 𝒰 \hat{\mathcal{U}} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG and spin 𝒱 ^ ^ 𝒱 \hat{\mathcal{V}} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG interaction matrices.
Expanding the summation over orbitals in the interaction Hamiltonian of equation (2 ), one obtains
H int subscript 𝐻 int \displaystyle H_{\text{int}} italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT int end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
= ∑ i j ∑ α β , σ l ç i j α β absent subscript 𝑖 𝑗 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝜎 𝑙
subscript superscript ç 𝛼 𝛽 𝑖 𝑗 \displaystyle=\sum_{ij}\sum_{\alpha\beta,\sigma_{l}}{\text{\c{c}}^{\alpha\beta%
}_{ij}} = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β , italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ç start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
( ∑ s V σ 1 σ 2 σ 3 σ 4 , i j α s α s , β s β s c i α s σ 1 † c j β s σ 2 † c j β s σ 3 c i α s σ 4 \displaystyle\;\;\Big{(}\sum_{s}V_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}\sigma_{4},ij%
}^{\alpha s\alpha s,\beta s\beta s}c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta s%
\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta s\sigma_{3}}c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{4}} ( ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s , italic_β italic_s italic_β italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
(45)
+ ∑ s ≠ p V σ 1 σ 2 σ 3 σ 4 , i j α s α p , β s β p c i α s σ 1 † c j β p σ 2 † c j β s σ 3 c i α p σ 4 subscript 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript 𝑉 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝜎 4 𝑖 𝑗
𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑝 𝛽 𝑠 𝛽 𝑝
superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 † superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑝 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑝 subscript 𝜎 4 \displaystyle+\sum_{s\neq p}V_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}\sigma_{4},ij}^{%
\alpha s\alpha p,\beta s\beta p}c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta p%
\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta s\sigma_{3}}c_{i\alpha p\sigma_{4}} + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s ≠ italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_p , italic_β italic_s italic_β italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_p italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_p italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
(46)
+ ∑ s ≠ p V σ 1 σ 2 σ 3 σ 4 , i j α s α p , β p β s c i α s σ 1 † c j β p σ 2 † c j β p σ 3 c i α s σ 4 subscript 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript 𝑉 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝜎 4 𝑖 𝑗
𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑝 𝛽 𝑝 𝛽 𝑠
superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 † superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑝 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑝 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 4 \displaystyle+\sum_{s\neq p}V_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}\sigma_{4},ij}^{%
\alpha s\alpha p,\beta p\beta s}c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta p%
\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta p\sigma_{3}}c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{4}} + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s ≠ italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_p , italic_β italic_p italic_β italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_p italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_p italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
(47)
+ ∑ s ≠ p V σ 1 σ 2 σ 3 σ 4 , i j α s α s , β p β p c i α s σ 1 † c j β s σ 2 † c j β p σ 3 c i α p σ 4 ) \displaystyle+\sum_{s\neq p}V_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}\sigma_{4},ij}^{%
\alpha s\alpha s,\beta p\beta p}c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta s%
\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta p\sigma_{3}}c_{i\alpha p\sigma_{4}}\Big{)} + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s ≠ italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s , italic_β italic_p italic_β italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_p italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_p italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )
(48)
Any other orbital terms would give null matrix elements also because of Pauli exclusion principle.
The procedure to obtain the spin and charge interaction matrices reduces to identify the terms in Eqs. (45 )-(48 ) with the respective term in equation (41 ).
Here, we will show as an example how to obtain the intraorbital elements [equation (45 )].
equation (45 ) shows same-orbital four-point interactions, similarly to the usual Hubbard Hamiltonian when α = β 𝛼 𝛽 \alpha=\beta italic_α = italic_β , H Hubbard = U 2 ∑ i , α s , σ 1 ≠ σ 2 n i α s σ 1 n i α s σ 2 = U 2 ∑ i α s σ 1 ≠ σ 2 c i α c σ 1 † c i α c σ 1 c i α c σ 2 † c i α c σ 2 subscript 𝐻 Hubbard 𝑈 2 subscript 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1
subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝑛 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝑛 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 𝑈 2 subscript 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 2 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑐 subscript 𝜎 1 † subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑐 subscript 𝜎 1 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑐 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑐 subscript 𝜎 2 H_{\text{Hubbard}}=\frac{U}{2}\sum_{i,\alpha s,\sigma_{1}\neq\sigma_{2}}n_{i%
\alpha s\sigma_{1}}n_{i\alpha s\sigma_{2}}=\frac{U}{2}\sum_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1%
}\neq\sigma_{2}}c_{i\alpha c\sigma_{1}}^{\dagger}c_{i\alpha c\sigma_{1}}c_{i%
\alpha c\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{i\alpha c\sigma_{2}} italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT Hubbard end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_U end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_α italic_s , italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≠ italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_U end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≠ italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_c italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_c italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_c italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_c italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
Taking the spin into consideration and using the definition of equation (44 ), one obtains
V σ 1 σ 2 σ 3 σ 4 , i j α s α s , β s β s c i α s , σ 1 † c j β s σ 2 † c j β s σ 3 c i α s σ 4 = [ − 𝒱 α s α s α s α s δ σ 1 σ 3 δ σ 2 σ 4 + 1 2 ( 𝒰 α s α s α s α s + 𝒱 α s α s α s α s ) δ σ 2 σ 3 δ σ 1 σ 4 ] × c i α s σ 1 † c j β s σ 2 † c j β s σ 3 c i α s σ 4 = − 𝒱 α s α s α s α s c i α s σ 1 † c j β s σ 2 † c j β s σ 1 c i α s σ 2 + 1 2 ( 𝒰 α s α s α s α s + 𝒱 α s α s α s α s ) c i α s σ 1 † c j β s σ 2 † c j β s σ 2 c i α s σ 1 = − 𝒱 α s α s α s α s c i α s σ 1 † c j β s σ 2 † c j β s σ 1 c i α s σ 2 + 1 2 ( 𝒰 α s α s α s α s + 𝒱 α s α s α s α s ) c i α s σ 1 † c i α s σ 1 c j β s σ 2 † c j β s σ 2 = − 𝒱 α s α s α s α s c i α s σ 1 † c j β s σ 2 † c j β s σ 1 c i α s σ 2 + 1 2 ( 𝒰 α s α s α s α s + 𝒱 α s α s α s α s ) n i α s σ 1 n j β s σ 2 . superscript subscript 𝑉 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝜎 4 𝑖 𝑗
𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛽 𝑠 𝛽 𝑠
superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1
† superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 4 delimited-[] subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 4 1 2 subscript superscript 𝒰 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝜎 4 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 † superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 3 subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 4 subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 † superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 1 2 subscript superscript 𝒰 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 † superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 † superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 1 2 subscript superscript 𝒰 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 † subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 † superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 1 2 subscript superscript 𝒰 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝑛 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝑛 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 \begin{split}V_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}\sigma_{4},ij}^{\alpha s\alpha s%
,\beta s\beta s}c_{i\alpha s,\sigma_{1}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta s\sigma_{2}}^{%
\dagger}c_{j\beta s\sigma_{3}}c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{4}}=\\
\left[-\mathcal{V}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}\delta_{\sigma_{1}%
\sigma_{3}}\delta_{\sigma_{2}\sigma_{4}}+\frac{1}{2}\left(\mathcal{U}^{\alpha s%
\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}+\mathcal{V}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}%
\right)\delta_{\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}}\delta_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{4}}\right]\\
\times c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta s\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{j%
\beta s\sigma_{3}}c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{4}}\\
=-\mathcal{V}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{%
\dagger}c_{j\beta s\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta s\sigma_{1}}c_{i\alpha s%
\sigma_{2}}\\
+\frac{1}{2}\left(\mathcal{U}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}+\mathcal{V%
}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}\right)c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{\dagger%
}c_{j\beta s\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta s\sigma_{2}}c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}%
\\
=-\mathcal{V}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{%
\dagger}c_{j\beta s\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta s\sigma_{1}}c_{i\alpha s%
\sigma_{2}}\\
+\frac{1}{2}\left(\mathcal{U}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}+\mathcal{V%
}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}\right)c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{\dagger%
}c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}c_{j\beta s\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta s\sigma_{2}}%
\\
=-\mathcal{V}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{%
\dagger}c_{j\beta s\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{j\beta s\sigma_{1}}c_{i\alpha s%
\sigma_{2}}\\
+\frac{1}{2}\left(\mathcal{U}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}+\mathcal{V%
}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}\right)n_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}n_{j\beta
s%
\sigma_{2}}.\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s , italic_β italic_s italic_β italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s , italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL [ - caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL × italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL = - caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL = - caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL = - caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . end_CELL end_ROW
(49)
The next step is to write the density-density term in momentum space.
First, let us consider the transformation c j α s σ † = ∑ 𝒌 e − i 𝒌 ⋅ 𝒓 j α c 𝒌 α s , σ † / N superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝛼 𝑠 𝜎 † subscript 𝒌 superscript 𝑒 ⋅ 𝑖 𝒌 subscript 𝒓 𝑗 𝛼 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝒌 𝛼 𝑠 𝜎
† 𝑁 c_{j\alpha s\sigma}^{\dagger}=\sum_{\boldsymbol{k}}e^{-i\boldsymbol{k}\cdot%
\boldsymbol{r}_{j\alpha}}c_{\boldsymbol{k}\alpha s,\sigma}^{\dagger}/\sqrt{N} italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_α italic_s italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_i bold_italic_k ⋅ bold_italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k italic_α italic_s , italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / square-root start_ARG italic_N end_ARG (with N 𝑁 N italic_N being the the number of lattice sites) in the first term of the above equality:
∑ i m α β , l 𝒱 α s α s α s α s c i α s σ 1 † c j = ( i + m α β β , l ) s σ 2 † c j = ( i + m α β β , l ) s σ 1 c i α s σ 2 = 1 N 2 ∑ i m α β , l 𝒌 1 , 𝒌 2 𝒌 3 , 𝒌 4 𝒱 α s α s α s α s e − i 𝒓 i α ⋅ ( 𝒌 1 − 𝒌 4 ) e − i 𝒓 ( i + m α β , l ) β ⋅ ( 𝒌 2 − 𝒌 3 ) × c 𝒌 1 α s σ 1 † c 𝒌 2 β s σ 2 † c 𝒌 3 β s σ 1 c 𝒌 4 α s σ 2 = 1 N 2 ∑ m α β , l 𝒌 1 , 𝒌 2 𝒌 3 , 𝒌 4 e − i 𝒓 i α ⋅ ( 𝒌 1 + 𝒌 2 − ( 𝒌 3 + 𝒌 4 ) ) e − i 𝜹 m α β , l ⋅ ( 𝒌 2 − 𝒌 3 ) × c 𝒌 1 α s σ 1 † c 𝒌 2 β s σ 2 † c 𝒌 3 β s σ 1 c 𝒌 4 α s σ 2 = 1 N ∑ m α β , l 𝒒 , 𝒌 1 𝒌 3 , 𝒌 4 𝒱 α s α s α s α s e − i 𝜹 m α β , l ⋅ 𝒒 × c 𝒌 1 α s σ 1 † c 𝒌 3 + 𝒒 β s σ 2 † c 𝒌 3 β s σ 1 c 𝒌 4 α s σ 2 δ 𝒌 1 + 𝒌 3 + 𝒒 , 𝒌 3 + 𝒌 4 = 1 N ∑ m α β , l 𝒒 𝒌 3 , 𝒌 4 𝒱 α s α s α s α s e − i 𝜹 m α β , l ⋅ 𝒒 × c 𝒌 4 − 𝒒 α s σ 1 † c 𝒌 4 α s σ 2 c 𝒌 3 + 𝒒 β s σ 2 † c 𝒌 3 β s σ 1 , subscript 𝑖 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 † superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝑖 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝛽 𝑙 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝑖 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝛽 𝑙 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 1 superscript 𝑁 2 subscript 𝑖 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
subscript 𝒌 1 subscript 𝒌 2
subscript 𝒌 3 subscript 𝒌 4
subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 superscript 𝑒 ⋅ 𝑖 subscript 𝒓 𝑖 𝛼 subscript 𝒌 1 subscript 𝒌 4 superscript 𝑒 ⋅ 𝑖 subscript 𝒓 𝑖 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙 𝛽 subscript 𝒌 2 subscript 𝒌 3 superscript subscript 𝑐 subscript 𝒌 1 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 † superscript subscript 𝑐 subscript 𝒌 2 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 subscript 𝒌 3 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝑐 subscript 𝒌 4 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 1 superscript 𝑁 2 subscript subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
subscript 𝒌 1 subscript 𝒌 2
subscript 𝒌 3 subscript 𝒌 4
superscript 𝑒 ⋅ 𝑖 subscript 𝒓 𝑖 𝛼 subscript 𝒌 1 subscript 𝒌 2 subscript 𝒌 3 subscript 𝒌 4 superscript 𝑒 ⋅ 𝑖 subscript 𝜹 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
subscript 𝒌 2 subscript 𝒌 3 superscript subscript 𝑐 subscript 𝒌 1 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 † superscript subscript 𝑐 subscript 𝒌 2 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 subscript 𝒌 3 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝑐 subscript 𝒌 4 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 1 𝑁 subscript subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
𝒒 subscript 𝒌 1
subscript 𝒌 3 subscript 𝒌 4
subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 superscript 𝑒 ⋅ 𝑖 subscript 𝜹 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
𝒒 superscript subscript 𝑐 subscript 𝒌 1 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 † superscript subscript 𝑐 subscript 𝒌 3 𝒒 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 subscript 𝒌 3 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝑐 subscript 𝒌 4 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝒌 1 subscript 𝒌 3 𝒒 subscript 𝒌 3 subscript 𝒌 4
1 𝑁 subscript subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
𝒒 subscript 𝒌 3 subscript 𝒌 4
subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 superscript 𝑒 ⋅ 𝑖 subscript 𝜹 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
𝒒 superscript subscript 𝑐 subscript 𝒌 4 𝒒 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 † subscript 𝑐 subscript 𝒌 4 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 superscript subscript 𝑐 subscript 𝒌 3 𝒒 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 subscript 𝒌 3 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 \begin{split}\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}i\\
m_{\alpha\beta},l\end{subarray}}\mathcal{V}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha
s%
}c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{\dagger}c_{j=(i+m_{\alpha\beta}\beta,l)s\sigma_{2}}^%
{\dagger}c_{j=(i+m_{\alpha\beta}\beta,l)s\sigma_{1}}c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{2}}\\
=\frac{1}{N^{2}}\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}i\\
m_{\alpha\beta},l\\
\boldsymbol{k}_{1},\boldsymbol{k}_{2}\\
\boldsymbol{k}_{3},\boldsymbol{k}_{4}\end{subarray}}\mathcal{V}^{\alpha s%
\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}e^{-i\boldsymbol{r}_{i\alpha}\cdot(\boldsymbol{k}_%
{1}-\boldsymbol{k}_{4})}e^{-i\boldsymbol{r}_{(i+m_{\alpha\beta},l)\beta}\cdot(%
\boldsymbol{k}_{2}-\boldsymbol{k}_{3})}\\
\times c_{\boldsymbol{k}_{1}\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{\dagger}c_{\boldsymbol{k}_{2}%
\beta s\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{\boldsymbol{k}_{3}\beta s\sigma_{1}}c_{%
\boldsymbol{k}_{4}\alpha s\sigma_{2}}\\
=\frac{1}{N^{2}}\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}m_{\alpha\beta},l\\
\boldsymbol{k}_{1},\boldsymbol{k}_{2}\\
\boldsymbol{k}_{3},\boldsymbol{k}_{4}\end{subarray}}e^{-i\boldsymbol{r}_{i%
\alpha}\cdot(\boldsymbol{k}_{1}+\boldsymbol{k}_{2}-(\boldsymbol{k}_{3}+%
\boldsymbol{k}_{4}))}e^{-i\boldsymbol{\delta}_{m_{\alpha\beta},l}\cdot(%
\boldsymbol{k}_{2}-\boldsymbol{k}_{3})}\\
\times c_{\boldsymbol{k}_{1}\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{\dagger}c_{\boldsymbol{k}_{2}%
\beta s\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{\boldsymbol{k}_{3}\beta s\sigma_{1}}c_{%
\boldsymbol{k}_{4}\alpha s\sigma_{2}}\\
=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}m_{\alpha\beta},l\\
\boldsymbol{q},\boldsymbol{k}_{1}\\
\boldsymbol{k}_{3},\boldsymbol{k}_{4}\end{subarray}}\mathcal{V}^{\alpha s%
\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}e^{-i\boldsymbol{\delta}_{m_{\alpha\beta},l}\cdot%
\boldsymbol{q}}\\
\times c_{\boldsymbol{k}_{1}\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{\dagger}c_{\boldsymbol{k}_{3}%
+\boldsymbol{q}\beta s\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{\boldsymbol{k}_{3}\beta s\sigma_%
{1}}c_{\boldsymbol{k}_{4}\alpha s\sigma_{2}}\delta_{\boldsymbol{k}_{1}+%
\boldsymbol{k}_{3}+\boldsymbol{q},\boldsymbol{k}_{3}+\boldsymbol{k}_{4}}\\
=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}m_{\alpha\beta},l\\
\boldsymbol{q}\\
\boldsymbol{k}_{3},\boldsymbol{k}_{4}\end{subarray}}\mathcal{V}^{\alpha s%
\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}e^{-i\boldsymbol{\delta}_{m_{\alpha\beta},l}\cdot%
\boldsymbol{q}}\\
\times c_{\boldsymbol{k}_{4}-\boldsymbol{q}\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{\dagger}c_{%
\boldsymbol{k}_{4}\alpha s\sigma_{2}}c_{\boldsymbol{k}_{3}+\boldsymbol{q}\beta
s%
\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{\boldsymbol{k}_{3}\beta s\sigma_{1}},\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_i end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = ( italic_i + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β , italic_l ) italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = ( italic_i + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β , italic_l ) italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_i end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_i bold_italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ ( bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_i bold_italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_i + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l ) italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ ( bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL × italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_i bold_italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ ( bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ( bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_i bold_italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ ( bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL × italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL bold_italic_q , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_i bold_italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ bold_italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL × italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_q italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_q , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL bold_italic_q end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_i bold_italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ bold_italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL × italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - bold_italic_q italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_q italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , end_CELL end_ROW
(50)
where we used that 𝒓 j α = 𝒓 ( i + m α β , l ) β = ∑ l 𝒓 i α + 𝜹 m α β , l subscript 𝒓 𝑗 𝛼 subscript 𝒓 𝑖 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙 𝛽 subscript 𝑙 subscript 𝒓 𝑖 𝛼 subscript 𝜹 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
\boldsymbol{r}_{j\alpha}=\boldsymbol{r}_{(i+m_{\alpha\beta},l)\beta}=\sum_{l}%
\boldsymbol{r}_{i\alpha}+\boldsymbol{\delta}_{m_{\alpha\beta},l} bold_italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = bold_italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_i + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l ) italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (l 𝑙 l italic_l indexing each m α β subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 m_{\alpha\beta} italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT -th nearest-neighbor) and the identity ∑ j e − i ( 𝒌 − 𝒌 ′ ) ⋅ 𝒓 j α = N δ 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ subscript 𝑗 superscript 𝑒 ⋅ 𝑖 𝒌 superscript 𝒌 ′ subscript 𝒓 𝑗 𝛼 𝑁 subscript 𝛿 𝒌 superscript 𝒌 ′
\sum_{j}e^{-i(\boldsymbol{k}-\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime})\cdot\boldsymbol{r}_{j%
\alpha}}=N\delta_{\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime}} ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_i ( bold_italic_k - bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ⋅ bold_italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_N italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
Also, it was convenient to define 𝒌 2 − 𝒌 3 = 𝒒 ⇒ 𝒌 2 = 𝒌 3 + 𝒒 subscript 𝒌 2 subscript 𝒌 3 𝒒 ⇒ subscript 𝒌 2 subscript 𝒌 3 𝒒 \boldsymbol{k}_{2}-\boldsymbol{k}_{3}=\boldsymbol{q}\Rightarrow\boldsymbol{k}_%
{2}=\boldsymbol{k}_{3}+\boldsymbol{q} bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = bold_italic_q ⇒ bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_q , while the Dirac delta δ 𝒌 1 + 𝒌 3 + 𝒒 , 𝒌 3 + 𝒌 4 subscript 𝛿 subscript 𝒌 1 subscript 𝒌 3 𝒒 subscript 𝒌 3 subscript 𝒌 4
\delta_{\boldsymbol{k}_{1}+\boldsymbol{k}_{3}+\boldsymbol{q},\boldsymbol{k}_{3%
}+\boldsymbol{k}_{4}} italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_q , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT imposed 𝒌 1 + 𝒒 = 𝒌 4 ⇒ 𝒌 1 = 𝒌 4 − 𝒒 subscript 𝒌 1 𝒒 subscript 𝒌 4 ⇒ subscript 𝒌 1 subscript 𝒌 4 𝒒 \boldsymbol{k}_{1}+\boldsymbol{q}=\boldsymbol{k}_{4}\Rightarrow\boldsymbol{k}_%
{1}=\boldsymbol{k}_{4}-\boldsymbol{q} bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_q = bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⇒ bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - bold_italic_q .
The above term even in momentum space cannot be realized if α ≠ β 𝛼 𝛽 \alpha\neq\beta italic_α ≠ italic_β since there is exchange of spin in the creation and annihilation operators.
Therefore, we must set 𝒱 α s α s α s α s = 0 subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 0 \mathcal{V}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}=0 caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 for α ≠ β 𝛼 𝛽 \alpha\neq\beta italic_α ≠ italic_β .
However, the spin part is non-zero when α = β 𝛼 𝛽 \alpha=\beta italic_α = italic_β because the above terms can be reorganized in density terms, as seen below.
Following the same procedure in the second term of the above equality, which is already a density-density term, results in
∑ i ∑ m α β , l 1 2 ( 𝒰 α s α s α s α s + 𝒱 α s α s α s α s ) × c i α s σ 1 † c i α s σ 1 c j = ( i + m α β , l ) β s σ 2 † c j = ( i + m α β , l ) β s σ 2 = 1 N ∑ m α β , l ∑ 𝒒 1 2 ( 𝒰 α s α s α s α s + 𝒱 α s α s α s α s ) e − i 𝜹 m α β , l ⋅ 𝒒 n α s σ 1 ( − 𝒒 ) n β s σ 2 ( 𝒒 ) . subscript 𝑖 subscript subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
1 2 subscript superscript 𝒰 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 † subscript 𝑐 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 superscript subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝑖 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 † subscript 𝑐 𝑗 𝑖 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 1 𝑁 subscript subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
subscript 𝒒 1 2 subscript superscript 𝒰 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 superscript 𝑒 ⋅ 𝑖 subscript 𝜹 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
𝒒 subscript 𝑛 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 𝒒 subscript 𝑛 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 𝒒 \begin{split}\sum_{i}\sum_{m_{\alpha\beta},l}\frac{1}{2}\left(\mathcal{U}^{%
\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}+\mathcal{V}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s%
\alpha s}\right)&\\
\times c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}^{\dagger}c_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}c_{j=(i+m_{%
\alpha\beta},l)\beta s\sigma_{2}}^{\dagger}c_{j=(i+m_{\alpha\beta},l)\beta s%
\sigma_{2}}&\\
=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{m_{\alpha\beta},l}\sum_{\boldsymbol{q}}\frac{1}{2}\left(%
\mathcal{U}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}+\mathcal{V}^{\alpha s\alpha s%
}_{\alpha s\alpha s}\right)e^{-i\boldsymbol{\delta}_{m_{\alpha\beta},l}\cdot%
\boldsymbol{q}}&\\
n_{\alpha s\sigma_{1}}(-\boldsymbol{q})n_{\beta s\sigma_{2}}(\boldsymbol{q}).&%
\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL × italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = ( italic_i + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l ) italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = ( italic_i + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l ) italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_i bold_italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ bold_italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( - bold_italic_q ) italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_q ) . end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(51)
At this point we can identify this last term with intersite interaction 1 2 ∑ σ g ∑ i j ∑ α β ∑ m α β U m α β n i α s σ 1 n j β s σ 2 1 2 subscript subscript 𝜎 𝑔 subscript 𝑖 𝑗 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 subscript subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝑈 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝑛 𝑖 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 1 subscript 𝑛 𝑗 𝛽 𝑠 subscript 𝜎 2 \frac{1}{2}\sum_{\sigma_{g}}\sum_{ij}\sum_{\alpha\beta}\sum_{m_{\alpha\beta}}U%
_{m_{\alpha\beta}}n_{i\alpha s\sigma_{1}}n_{j\beta s\sigma_{2}} divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_α italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_β italic_s italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
For α ≠ β 𝛼 𝛽 \alpha\neq\beta italic_α ≠ italic_β , 𝒱 α s α s α s α s = 0 subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 0 \mathcal{V}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}=0 caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 , so 𝒰 α s α s α s α s = 2 ⋅ 2 ⋅ ∑ m α β U m α β e i 𝜹 m α β , l ⋅ 𝒒 / 2 = 2 ⋅ ∑ m α β , l U m α β e i 𝜹 m α β , l ⋅ 𝒒 = U α β subscript superscript 𝒰 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 ⋅ 2 2 subscript subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝑈 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 superscript 𝑒 ⋅ 𝑖 subscript 𝜹 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
𝒒 2 ⋅ 2 subscript subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
subscript 𝑈 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 superscript 𝑒 ⋅ 𝑖 subscript 𝜹 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
𝒒 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 \mathcal{U}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}=2\cdot 2\cdot\sum_{m_{\alpha%
\beta}}U_{m_{\alpha\beta}}e^{i\boldsymbol{\delta}_{m_{\alpha\beta},l}\cdot%
\boldsymbol{q}}/2=2\cdot\sum_{m_{\alpha\beta},l}U_{m_{\alpha\beta}}e^{i%
\boldsymbol{\delta}_{m_{\alpha\beta},l}\cdot\boldsymbol{q}}=U_{\alpha\beta} caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 ⋅ 2 ⋅ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i bold_italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ bold_italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 = 2 ⋅ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i bold_italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ bold_italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (one of the factors of 2 comes from the matrix element we just dissected, while the other one comes from ç i j α β = 1 / 2 subscript superscript ç 𝛼 𝛽 𝑖 𝑗 1 2 {\text{\c{c}}^{\alpha\beta}_{ij}}=1/2 ç start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / 2 for α ≠ β 𝛼 𝛽 \alpha\neq\beta italic_α ≠ italic_β ).
When α = β 𝛼 𝛽 \alpha=\beta italic_α = italic_β , the term 𝒱 α s α s α s α s subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 \mathcal{V}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s} caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT will be non-zero, as well as 𝒰 α s α s α s α s subscript superscript 𝒰 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 \mathcal{U}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s} caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , and in momentum space they will appear with a form factor 𝒰 α s α s α s α s = 𝒱 α s α s α s α s = ∑ m α β , l U m α α e i 𝜹 m α α , l ⋅ 𝒒 = U α α subscript superscript 𝒰 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 subscript superscript 𝒱 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 𝛼 𝑠 subscript subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛽 𝑙
subscript 𝑈 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛼 superscript 𝑒 ⋅ 𝑖 subscript 𝜹 subscript 𝑚 𝛼 𝛼 𝑙
𝒒 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 \mathcal{U}^{\alpha s\alpha s}_{\alpha s\alpha s}=\mathcal{V}^{\alpha s\alpha s%
}_{\alpha s\alpha s}=\sum_{m_{\alpha\beta},l}U_{m_{\alpha\alpha}}e^{i%
\boldsymbol{\delta}_{m_{\alpha\alpha},l}\cdot\boldsymbol{q}}=U_{\alpha\alpha} caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = caligraphic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_s italic_α italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i bold_italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ bold_italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , which is obtained by comparing the above results with equation (45 ).
The other matrix elements can be obtained by a similar procedure.
Appendix B Derivation of bounds for eigenvalues
In order to keep track of the spin-charge competition we evaluate the main eigenvalue of each of these equations and compare them.
It is not enough to subtract the equations once we would not keep track of the main eigenvalues in this way.
We now present the result of Theorem 2.1 of the work [61 ] stating that if an n 𝒜 × n 𝒜 subscript 𝑛 𝒜 subscript 𝑛 𝒜 n_{\mathcal{A}}\times n_{\mathcal{A}} italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT matrix 𝒜 𝒜 \mathcal{A} caligraphic_A complex matrix 𝒜 𝒜 \mathcal{A} caligraphic_A has reals eigenvalues and minimum eigenvalue λ min 𝒜 superscript subscript 𝜆 min 𝒜 \lambda_{\text{min}}^{\mathcal{A}} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and maximum eigenvalue λ max 𝒜 superscript subscript 𝜆 max 𝒜 \lambda_{\text{max}}^{\mathcal{A}} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , and letting
m 𝒜 subscript 𝑚 𝒜 \displaystyle m_{\mathcal{A}} italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
= tr 𝒜 / n 𝒜 , absent tr 𝒜 subscript 𝑛 𝒜 \displaystyle=\text{tr}\mathcal{A}/n_{\mathcal{A}}, = tr caligraphic_A / italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ,
(52)
s 𝒜 2 superscript subscript 𝑠 𝒜 2 \displaystyle s_{\mathcal{A}}^{2} italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
= tr 𝒜 2 / n 𝒜 − m 𝒜 2 , absent tr superscript 𝒜 2 subscript 𝑛 𝒜 superscript subscript 𝑚 𝒜 2 \displaystyle=\text{tr}\mathcal{A}^{2}/n_{\mathcal{A}}-m_{\mathcal{A}}^{2}, = tr caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,
(53)
then
m 𝒜 − s 𝒜 ( n 𝒜 − 1 ) 1 / 2 ≤ subscript 𝑚 𝒜 subscript 𝑠 𝒜 superscript subscript 𝑛 𝒜 1 1 2 absent \displaystyle m_{\mathcal{A}}-s_{\mathcal{A}}(n_{\mathcal{A}}-1)^{1/2}\leq italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤
λ min 𝒜 ≤ m 𝒜 − s 𝒜 / ( n 𝒜 − 1 ) 1 / 2 , superscript subscript 𝜆 min 𝒜 subscript 𝑚 𝒜 subscript 𝑠 𝒜 superscript subscript 𝑛 𝒜 1 1 2 \displaystyle\lambda_{\text{min}}^{\mathcal{A}}\leq m_{\mathcal{A}}-s_{%
\mathcal{A}}/(n_{\mathcal{A}}-1)^{1/2}, italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ( italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,
(54)
m 𝒜 + s 𝒜 / ( n 𝒜 − 1 ) 1 / 2 ≤ subscript 𝑚 𝒜 subscript 𝑠 𝒜 superscript subscript 𝑛 𝒜 1 1 2 absent \displaystyle m_{\mathcal{A}}+s_{\mathcal{A}}/(n_{\mathcal{A}}-1)^{1/2}\leq italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ( italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤
λ max 𝒜 ≤ m 𝒜 + s 𝒜 ( n 𝒜 − 1 ) 1 / 2 . superscript subscript 𝜆 max 𝒜 subscript 𝑚 𝒜 subscript 𝑠 𝒜 superscript subscript 𝑛 𝒜 1 1 2 \displaystyle\lambda_{\text{max}}^{\mathcal{A}}\leq m_{\mathcal{A}}+s_{%
\mathcal{A}}(n_{\mathcal{A}}-1)^{1/2}. italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .
(55)
These are bounds for the maximum and minimum eigenvalues of Hermitian matrices.
They are particularly useful for analyzing the Stoner criteria, because in the diagonal approximation [30 ] the product of χ ^ 0 subscript ^ 𝜒 0 \hat{\chi}_{0} over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and each of the interaction matrices is Hermitian if χ α α s p = χ α α p s superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑝 𝑠 \chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}=\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ps} italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for any pair p , s 𝑝 𝑠
p,s italic_p , italic_s (this is our main approximation for the next analysis), because the interaction matrices (𝒰 ^ , 𝒱 ^ ^ 𝒰 ^ 𝒱
\mathcal{\hat{U}},\hat{\mathcal{V}} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG , over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG ) are Hermitian and, in this way, χ ^ 0 subscript ^ 𝜒 0 \hat{\chi}_{0} over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is Hermitian as well.
Next, we derive the boundaries of the maximum eigenvalue of the charge and spin Stoner criteria and, at the end, compare both of them.
We start with the spin Stoner criterion.
Under the diagonal approximation, we obtain blocks
𝒱 ^ χ ^ ^ 𝒱 ^ 𝜒 \displaystyle\hat{\mathcal{V}}\hat{\chi} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG
= [ 𝒱 ^ s s χ ^ s s 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 𝒱 ^ s p χ ^ s p 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ ] , absent matrix subscript ^ 𝒱 𝑠 𝑠 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 subscript ^ 𝒱 𝑠 𝑝 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 \displaystyle=\begin{bmatrix}\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{ss}\hat{\chi}_{ss}&\hat{0}&%
\hat{0}&\hat{0}\\
\hat{0}&\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{sp}\hat{\chi}_{sp}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}\\
\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}\\
\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}\end{bmatrix}, = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ,
(60)
𝒱 ^ s s χ ^ s s subscript ^ 𝒱 𝑠 𝑠 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 \displaystyle\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{ss}\hat{\chi}_{ss} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
= [ 𝒱 ^ A A s s χ ^ A A s s 0 ^ 0 ^ ⋯ 0 ^ 𝒱 ^ B B s s χ ^ B B s s 0 ^ ⋯ 0 ^ 0 ^ 𝒱 ^ C C s s χ ^ B B s s ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ ] , absent matrix superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝐴 𝐴 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝐴 𝐴 𝑠 𝑠 ^ 0 ^ 0 ⋯ ^ 0 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝐵 𝐵 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝐵 𝐵 𝑠 𝑠 ^ 0 ⋯ ^ 0 ^ 0 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝐶 𝐶 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝐵 𝐵 𝑠 𝑠 ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ \displaystyle=\begin{bmatrix}\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{AA}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{AA}^{ss}&%
\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\cdots\\
\hat{0}&\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{BB}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{BB}^{ss}&\hat{0}&\cdots\\
\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{CC}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{BB}^{ss}&\cdots\\
\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\ddots\end{bmatrix}, = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋱ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ,
(65)
𝒱 ^ s p χ ^ s p subscript ^ 𝒱 𝑠 𝑝 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 \displaystyle\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{sp}\hat{\chi}_{sp} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
= diag ( 𝒱 ^ s p χ ^ s p , … , 𝒱 ^ s p χ ^ s p ) , absent diag superscript ^ 𝒱 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 … superscript ^ 𝒱 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 \displaystyle=\text{diag}(\hat{\mathcal{V}}^{sp}\hat{\chi}^{sp},...,\hat{%
\mathcal{V}}^{sp}\hat{\chi}^{sp}), = diag ( over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , … , over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ,
(66)
𝒱 ^ s p χ ^ s p superscript ^ 𝒱 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 \displaystyle\hat{\mathcal{V}}^{sp}\hat{\chi}^{sp} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
= [ 𝒱 ^ A A s p χ ^ A A s p 0 ^ 0 ^ ⋯ 0 ^ 𝒱 ^ B B s p χ ^ B B s p 0 ^ ⋯ 0 ^ 0 ^ 𝒱 ^ C C s p χ ^ C C s p ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ ] , absent matrix superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝐴 𝐴 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝐴 𝐴 𝑠 𝑝 ^ 0 ^ 0 ⋯ ^ 0 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝐵 𝐵 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝐵 𝐵 𝑠 𝑝 ^ 0 ⋯ ^ 0 ^ 0 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝐶 𝐶 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝐶 𝐶 𝑠 𝑝 ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ \displaystyle=\begin{bmatrix}\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{AA}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{AA}^{sp}&%
\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\cdots\\
\hat{0}&\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{BB}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{BB}^{sp}&\hat{0}&\cdots\\
\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{CC}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{CC}^{sp}&\cdots\\
\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\ddots\end{bmatrix}, = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋱ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ,
(71)
𝒱 ^ α α s s χ ^ α α s s superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 \displaystyle\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
= χ α α s s [ U α α J α α J α α ⋯ J α α U α α J α α ⋯ J α α J α α U α α ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ ] , absent superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 matrix subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 ⋯ subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 ⋯ subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ \displaystyle=\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\begin{bmatrix}U_{\alpha\alpha}&J_{%
\alpha\alpha}&J_{\alpha\alpha}&\cdots\\
J_{\alpha\alpha}&U_{\alpha\alpha}&J_{\alpha\alpha}&\cdots\\
J_{\alpha\alpha}&J_{\alpha\alpha}&U_{\alpha\alpha}&\cdots\\
\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\ddots\end{bmatrix}, = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋱ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ,
(76)
𝒱 ^ α α s p χ ^ α α s p superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 \displaystyle\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
= χ α α s p [ J α α ′ U α α ′ U α α ′ J α α ′ ] . absent superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 matrix subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 \displaystyle=\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\begin{bmatrix}J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}%
&U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}\\
U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}&J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}\end{bmatrix}. = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] .
(79)
Using n 𝒱 ^ α α s p χ ^ α α s p = 2 subscript 𝑛 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 2 n_{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}}=2 italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 , tr 𝒱 ^ α α s p χ ^ α α s p = χ α α s p 2 J α α ′ tr superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 2 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 \text{tr}\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}=%
\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}2J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha} tr over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , and tr ( 𝒱 ^ α α s p χ ^ α α s p ) 2 = ( χ α α s p ) 2 2 ( ( J α α ′ ) 2 + ( U α α ′ ) 2 ) tr superscript superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 2 superscript superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 2 2 superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 \text{tr}(\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp})%
^{2}=(\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp})^{2}2\left((J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}+(U^{%
\prime}_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}\right) tr ( over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 ( ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , we obtain parameters
m 𝒱 ^ α α s p χ ^ α α s p = ( χ α α s p ) 2 J α α ′ / 2 = χ α α s p J α α ′ , s 𝒱 ^ α α s p χ ^ α α s p 2 = ( χ α α s p ) 2 2 ( ( J α α ′ ) 2 + ( U α α ′ ) 2 ) / 2 − m 𝒱 ^ α α s p χ ^ α α s p 2 = ( χ α α s p ) 2 ( ( J α α ′ ) 2 + ( U α α ′ ) 2 − ( J α α ′ ) 2 ) ⇒ s 𝒱 ^ α α s p χ ^ α α s p = χ α α s p U α α ′ . formulae-sequence subscript 𝑚 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 2 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 superscript subscript 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 2 superscript superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 2 2 superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 2 superscript superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 2 superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 ⇒ subscript 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 \begin{split}m_{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}%
^{sp}}&=(\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp})2J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}/2=\chi_{\alpha%
\alpha}^{sp}J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha},\\
s_{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}}^{2}&=(%
\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp})^{2}2\left((J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}+(U^{\prime%
}_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}\right)/2-m_{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\hat{%
\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}}^{2}\\
&=(\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp})^{2}\left((J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}+(U^{%
\prime}_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}-(J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}\right)\\
\Rightarrow s_{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^%
{sp}}&=\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}.\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL = ( italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) 2 italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 2 = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL = ( italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 ( ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) / 2 - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = ( italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⇒ italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . end_CELL end_ROW
(80)
The boundaries for the eigenvalues are
χ α α s p ( J α α ′ + U α α ′ ) ≤ λ max 𝒱 ^ α α s p χ ^ α α s p ≤ χ α α s p ( J α α ′ + U α α ′ ) ⇒ λ max 𝒱 ^ α α s p χ ^ α α s p = χ α α s p ( J α α ′ + U α α ′ ) . superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 superscript subscript 𝜆 max superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 ⇒ superscript subscript 𝜆 max superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 \begin{split}\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}(J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}+U^{\prime}_{%
\alpha\alpha})\leq\lambda_{\text{max}}^{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}%
\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}}\leq\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}(J^{\prime}_{\alpha%
\alpha}+U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha})\\
\Rightarrow\lambda_{\text{max}}^{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\hat{%
\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}}=\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}(J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}+%
U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}).\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ≤ italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⇒ italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) . end_CELL end_ROW
(81)
It is trivial to compute the eigenvalue of a 2 × 2 2 2 2\times 2 2 × 2 matrix but here we show an example where the theorem works well to determine the main eigenvalue.
Now, we move to 𝒱 ^ α α s s χ ^ α α s s superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 \hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , where n 𝒱 ^ α α s s χ ^ α α s s = N o , tr 𝒱 ^ α α s s χ ^ α α s s = χ α α s s N o U α α formulae-sequence subscript 𝑛 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 tr superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 n_{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}}=N_{o},%
\text{tr}\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}=%
\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}N_{o}U_{\alpha\alpha} italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , tr over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , and tr ( 𝒱 ^ α α s s χ ^ α α s s ) 2 = ( χ α α s s ) 2 ( U α α 2 + J α α 2 ( N o − 1 ) ) N o tr superscript superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 2 superscript superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 2 superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 2 superscript subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 \text{tr}(\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss})%
^{2}=(\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss})^{2}(U_{\alpha\alpha}^{2}+J_{\alpha\alpha}^{2}(%
N_{o}-1))N_{o} tr ( over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ) italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
We, therefore, obtain parameters
m 𝒱 ^ α α s s χ ^ α α s s = χ α α s s N o U α α / N o = χ α α s s U α α , s 𝒱 ^ α α s s χ ^ α α s s 2 = ( χ α α s s ) 2 ( U α α 2 + J α α 2 ( N o − 1 ) ) N o / N o − m 𝒱 ^ α α s s χ ^ α α s s 2 = ( χ α α s s ) 2 ( U α α 2 + J α α 2 ( N o − 1 ) − U α α 2 ) ⇒ s 𝒱 ^ α α s p χ ^ α α s p = χ α α s s J α α ( N o − 1 ) 1 / 2 . formulae-sequence subscript 𝑚 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 superscript subscript 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 2 superscript superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 2 superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 2 superscript subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 superscript subscript 𝑚 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 2 superscript superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 2 superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 2 superscript subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 2 ⇒ subscript 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 1 2 \begin{split}m_{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}%
^{ss}}=\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}N_{o}U_{\alpha\alpha}/N_{o}=\chi_{\alpha\alpha}%
^{ss}U_{\alpha\alpha},&\\
s_{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}}^{2}=(%
\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss})^{2}(U_{\alpha\alpha}^{2}+J_{\alpha\alpha}^{2}(N_{o}-%
1))N_{o}/N_{o}&\\
-m_{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}}^{2}&%
\\
=(\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss})^{2}(U_{\alpha\alpha}^{2}+J_{\alpha\alpha}^{2}(N_{o%
}-1)-U_{\alpha\alpha}^{2})&\\
\Rightarrow s_{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^%
{sp}}=\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}J_{\alpha\alpha}(N_{o}-1)^{1/2}.&\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ) italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL = ( italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) - italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⇒ italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(82)
Thus, the boundaries are
χ α α s s ( U α α + J α α ) ≤ λ max 𝒱 ^ α α s s χ ^ α α s s ≤ χ α α s s ( U α α + J α α ( N o − 1 ) ) . superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 superscript subscript 𝜆 max superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 \chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}(U_{\alpha\alpha}+J_{\alpha\alpha})\leq\lambda_{\text{%
max}}^{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}}%
\leq\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}(U_{\alpha\alpha}+J_{\alpha\alpha}(N_{o}-1)). italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ≤ italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ) .
(83)
Notice the upper boundary here grows with the number of orbitals.
By a simple inspection of the typical values of the non-interacting susceptibility, we conclude that it is more likely that max α s = max α λ max 𝒱 ^ α α s s χ ^ α α s s > max α λ max 𝒱 ^ α α s p χ ^ α α s p max subscript 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝛼 superscript subscript 𝜆 max superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝛼 superscript subscript 𝜆 max superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 \text{max}\alpha_{s}=\max_{\alpha}\lambda_{\text{max}}^{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{%
\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}}>\max_{\alpha}\lambda_{\text{%
max}}^{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}} max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_max start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > roman_max start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , meaning the homogeneous elements dominate the spin fluctuations.
Next, we move to the charge channel.
On the charge channel, however, the previous diagonal bare susceptibility approximation is not enough for keeping the product of matrices Hermitian.
The other assumption must be that the susceptibility does not show preference for any specific sublattice site, that is χ ^ α β s s = χ ^ α β p p superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛽 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛽 𝑝 𝑝 \hat{\chi}_{\alpha\beta}^{ss}=\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\beta}^{pp} over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and χ ^ α β s p = χ ^ α β p s superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛽 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛽 𝑝 𝑠 \hat{\chi}_{\alpha\beta}^{sp}=\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\beta}^{ps} over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for any α , β , s , p 𝛼 𝛽 𝑠 𝑝
\alpha,\beta,s,p italic_α , italic_β , italic_s , italic_p .
Although physically this may seem a reasonable assumption, it might not be realistic in systems with fractional dimension, such as thick graphene samples where the outer, surface sublattice sites have higher density of states than the inner sites.
Under this approximation, the charge Stoner parameter depends on the main eigenvalue of the following matrix
𝒰 ^ χ ^ = [ 𝒰 ^ s s χ ^ s s 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ ] , ^ 𝒰 ^ 𝜒 matrix subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 ^ 0 \hat{\mathcal{U}}\hat{\chi}=\begin{bmatrix}\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss}\hat{\chi}_{%
ss}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}\\
\hat{0}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{sp}\hat{\chi}_{sp}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}\\
\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}\\
\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}&\hat{0}\end{bmatrix}, over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ,
(84)
𝒰 ^ s s χ ^ s s = [ 𝒰 ^ A A s s χ ^ α α s s 𝒰 ^ A B s s χ ^ α α s s 𝒰 ^ A C s s χ ^ α α s s ⋯ 𝒰 ^ A B s s † χ ^ α α s s 𝒰 ^ B B s s χ ^ α α s s 𝒰 ^ B C s s χ ^ α α s s ⋯ 𝒰 ^ A C s s † χ ^ α α s s 𝒰 ^ B C s s † χ ^ α α s s 𝒰 ^ C C s s χ ^ α α s s ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ ] , subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 matrix superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐴 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐵 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐶 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 ⋯ superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐵 𝑠 𝑠 †
superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐵 𝐵 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐵 𝐶 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 ⋯ superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐶 𝑠 𝑠 †
superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐵 𝐶 𝑠 𝑠 †
superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐶 𝐶 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ \hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss}\hat{\chi}_{ss}=\begin{bmatrix}\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AA}^{%
ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AB}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{%
\alpha\alpha}^{ss}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AC}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}&%
\cdots\\
\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AB}^{ss\dagger}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}&\hat{\mathcal%
{U}}_{BB}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{BC}^{ss}\hat{%
\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}&\cdots\\
\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AC}^{ss\dagger}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}&\hat{\mathcal%
{U}}_{BC}^{ss\dagger}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{CC}^{ss%
}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}&\cdots\\
\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\ddots\\
\end{bmatrix}, over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋱ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ,
(85)
𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p = diag ( 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p , … , 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p ) , subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 diag superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 … superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 \hat{\mathcal{U}}_{sp}\hat{\chi}_{sp}=\text{diag}(\hat{\mathcal{U}}^{sp}\hat{%
\chi}^{sp},...,\hat{\mathcal{U}}^{sp}\hat{\chi}^{sp}), over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = diag ( over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , … , over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ,
(86)
𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p = [ 𝒰 ^ A A s p χ ^ α α s p 𝒰 ^ A B s p χ ^ α α s p 𝒰 ^ A C s p χ ^ α α s p ⋯ 𝒰 ^ A B s p † χ ^ α α s p 𝒰 ^ B B s p χ ^ α α s p 𝒰 ^ B C s p χ ^ α α s p ⋯ 𝒰 ^ A C s p † χ ^ α α s p 𝒰 ^ B C s p † χ ^ α α s p 𝒰 ^ C C s p χ ^ α α s p ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ ] , superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 matrix superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐴 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐵 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐶 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 ⋯ superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐵 𝑠 𝑝 †
superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐵 𝐵 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐵 𝐶 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 ⋯ superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐴 𝐶 𝑠 𝑝 †
superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐵 𝐶 𝑠 𝑝 †
superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝐶 𝐶 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ \hat{\mathcal{U}}^{sp}\hat{\chi}^{sp}=\begin{bmatrix}\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AA}^{%
sp}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AB}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{%
\alpha\alpha}^{sp}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AC}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}&%
\cdots\\
\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AB}^{sp\dagger}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}&\hat{\mathcal%
{U}}_{BB}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{BC}^{sp}\hat{%
\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}&\cdots\\
\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{AC}^{sp\dagger}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}&\hat{\mathcal%
{U}}_{BC}^{sp\dagger}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}&\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{CC}^{sp%
}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}&\cdots\\
\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\ddots\end{bmatrix}, over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋱ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ,
(87)
𝒰 ^ α α s s χ ^ α α s s = χ α α s s [ U α α N α α N α α ⋯ N α α U α α N α α ⋯ N α α N α α U α α ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ ] , superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 matrix subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛼 ⋯ subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛼 ⋯ subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ \hat{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}=\chi_{%
\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\begin{bmatrix}U_{\alpha\alpha}&N_{\alpha\alpha}&N_{\alpha%
\alpha}&\cdots\\
N_{\alpha\alpha}&U_{\alpha\alpha}&N_{\alpha\alpha}&\cdots\\
N_{\alpha\alpha}&N_{\alpha\alpha}&U_{\alpha\alpha}&\cdots\\
\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\ddots\end{bmatrix}, over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋱ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ,
(88)
𝒰 ^ α α s p χ ^ α α s p = χ α α s p [ J α α ′ M α α M α α J α α ′ ] , superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 matrix subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑀 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑀 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 \hat{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}=\chi_{%
\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\begin{bmatrix}J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}&M_{\alpha\alpha}\\
M_{\alpha\alpha}&J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}\end{bmatrix}, over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ,
(89)
𝒰 ^ α β s s χ ^ α α s s = χ α α s s [ U α β U α β ′ U α β ′ ⋯ U α β ′ U α β U α β ′ ⋯ U α β ′ U α β ′ U α β ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋯ ] , superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝛼 𝛽 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 matrix subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 ⋯ subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 ⋯ subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 ⋯ ⋮ ⋮ ⋮ ⋯ \hat{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha\beta}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}=\chi_{%
\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\begin{bmatrix}U_{\alpha\beta}&U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}&U^{%
\prime}_{\alpha\beta}&\cdots\\
U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}&U_{\alpha\beta}&U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}&\cdots\\
U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}&U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}&U_{\alpha\beta}&\cdots\\
\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\cdots\end{bmatrix}, over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL start_CELL ⋯ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ,
(90)
𝒰 ^ α β s p χ ^ α α s p = χ α α s p [ J α β ′ J α β J α β J α β ′ ] . superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝛼 𝛽 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 matrix subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 \hat{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha\beta}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}=\chi_{%
\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\begin{bmatrix}J^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}&J_{\alpha\beta}\\
J_{\alpha\beta}&J^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}\end{bmatrix}. over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] .
(91)
Next, we derive the lower eigenvalues of each of these block matrices, because the Stoner criterion includes a minus sign.
For simplicity, consider J α α ′ = J β β ′ , J α α = J β β , M α α = M β β , N α α = N β β formulae-sequence subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛽 𝛽 formulae-sequence subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛽 𝛽 formulae-sequence subscript 𝑀 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑀 𝛽 𝛽 subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑁 𝛽 𝛽 J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}=J^{\prime}_{\beta\beta},J_{\alpha\alpha}=J_{\beta%
\beta},M_{\alpha\alpha}=M_{\beta\beta},N_{\alpha\alpha}=N_{\beta\beta} italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for any α , β 𝛼 𝛽
\alpha,\beta italic_α , italic_β .
We start with the 2 N s × 2 N s 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 2N_{s}\times 2N_{s} 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 \hat{\mathcal{U}}^{sp}\hat{\chi}^{sp} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blocks, where n 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p = 2 N s subscript 𝑛 superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 n_{\hat{\mathcal{U}}^{sp}\hat{\chi}^{sp}}=2N_{s} italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , tr 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p = χ α α s p N s 2 J α α ′ tr superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 2 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 \text{tr}\hat{\mathcal{U}}^{sp}\hat{\chi}^{sp}=\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}N_{s}2J%
^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha} tr over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , tr ( 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p ) 2 = ( χ α α s p ) 2 [ ( J α α ′ ) 2 + M α α 2 + ∑ α > β ( | J α β ′ | 2 + | J α β | 2 ) ] 2 N s tr superscript superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 2 superscript superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 2 delimited-[] superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 superscript subscript 𝑀 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 2 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 \text{tr}(\hat{\mathcal{U}}^{sp}\hat{\chi}^{sp})^{2}=(\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}%
)^{2}\left[(J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}+M_{\alpha\alpha}^{2}+\sum_{\alpha>%
\beta}(|J^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|J_{\alpha\beta}|^{2})\right]2N_{s} tr ( over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , resulting in parameters
m 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p = χ α α s p 2 N s J α α ′ / ( 2 N s ) = χ α α s p J α α ′ , s 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p 2 = [ ( J α α ′ ) 2 + M α α 2 + ∑ α > β ( | J α β ′ | 2 + | J α β | 2 ) ] × 2 N s / ( 2 N s ) ( χ α α s p ) 2 − m 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p 2 = ( χ α α s p ) 2 [ M α α 2 + ∑ α > β ( | J α β ′ | 2 + | J α β | 2 ) ] . formulae-sequence subscript 𝑚 superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 superscript subscript 𝑠 superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 2 delimited-[] superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 superscript subscript 𝑀 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 2 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 superscript superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 2 superscript superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 2 delimited-[] superscript subscript 𝑀 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 2 \begin{split}m_{\hat{\mathcal{U}}^{sp}\hat{\chi}^{sp}}=\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp%
}2N_{s}J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}/(2N_{s})=\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}J^{\prime}_{%
\alpha\alpha},&\\
s_{\hat{\mathcal{U}}^{sp}\hat{\chi}^{sp}}^{2}=\left[(J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}%
)^{2}+M_{\alpha\alpha}^{2}+\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|J^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+%
|J_{\alpha\beta}|^{2})\right]&\\
\times 2N_{s}/(2N_{s})(\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp})^{2}-m_{\hat{\mathcal{U}}^{sp}%
\hat{\chi}^{sp}}^{2}&\\
=(\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp})^{2}[M_{\alpha\alpha}^{2}+\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|J^{%
\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|J_{\alpha\beta}|^{2})].&\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ( 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [ ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL × 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ( 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL = ( italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] . end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(92)
Thus,
χ α α s p ( J α α ′ − ( 2 N s − 1 ) 1 / 2 M α α 2 + ∑ α > β ( | J α β ′ | 2 + | J α β | 2 ) ) ≤ λ min 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p ≤ χ α α s p ( J α α ′ − ( 2 N s − 1 ) − 1 / 2 M α α 2 + ∑ α > β ( | J α β ′ | 2 + | J α β | 2 ) ) , superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 superscript 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 1 1 2 superscript subscript 𝑀 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript 𝜆 min superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 superscript 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 1 1 2 superscript subscript 𝑀 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 2 \begin{split}\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}(J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}-(2N_{s}-1)^{1/%
2}\sqrt{M_{\alpha\alpha}^{2}+\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|J^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2%
}+|J_{\alpha\beta}|^{2})})&\\
\leq\lambda_{\text{min}}^{\hat{\mathcal{U}}^{sp}\hat{\chi}^{sp}}\leq&\\
\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}(J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}-(2N_{s}-1)^{-1/2}\sqrt{M_{%
\alpha\alpha}^{2}+\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|J^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|J_{%
\alpha\beta}|^{2})}),&\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ( 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_ARG ) end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ≤ italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ( 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_ARG ) , end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(93)
meaning the minimum eigenvalue is favored (the lower bound becomes negative) as the number of sublattice sites increases.
Lastly, the homogeneous orbital elements 𝒰 ^ s s χ ^ s s subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 \hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss}\hat{\chi}_{ss} over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are such that n 𝒰 ^ s s χ ^ s s = N o N s = N b subscript 𝑛 subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 subscript 𝑁 𝑏 n_{\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss}\hat{\chi}_{ss}}=N_{o}N_{s}=N_{b} italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , tr 𝒰 ^ s s χ ^ s s = χ α α s s U α α N b tr subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑁 𝑏 \text{tr}\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss}\hat{\chi}_{ss}=\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}U_{%
\alpha\alpha}N_{b} tr over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , and tr ( 𝒰 ^ s s χ ^ s s ) 2 = ( χ α α s s ) 2 ( U α α 2 + N α α 2 ( N o − 1 ) + ∑ α > β ( | U α β | 2 + | U α β ′ | 2 ( N o − 1 ) ) ) N b tr superscript subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 2 superscript superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 2 superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 2 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 subscript 𝑁 𝑏 \text{tr}(\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss}\hat{\chi}_{ss})^{2}=(\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}%
)^{2}(U_{\alpha\alpha}^{2}+N_{\alpha\alpha}^{2}(N_{o}-1)+\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|%
U_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}(N_{o}-1)))N_{b} tr ( over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ) ) italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , resulting in parameters
m 𝒰 ^ s s χ ^ s s = χ α α s s U α α N b / N b = χ α α s s U α α , s 𝒰 ^ s s χ ^ s s 2 = ( χ α α s s ) 2 ( U α α 2 + N α α 2 ( N o − 1 ) + ∑ α > β ( | U α β | 2 + | U α β ′ | 2 ( N o − 1 ) ) ) N b / N b − m 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p 2 = ( χ α α s s ) 2 ( N α α 2 ( N o − 1 ) + ∑ α > β ( | U α β | 2 + | U α β ′ | 2 ( N o − 1 ) ) ) . formulae-sequence subscript 𝑚 subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑁 𝑏 subscript 𝑁 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 superscript subscript 𝑠 subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 2 superscript superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 2 superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 2 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 subscript 𝑁 𝑏 subscript 𝑁 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝑚 superscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 superscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 2 superscript superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 2 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 \begin{split}m_{\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss}\hat{\chi}_{ss}}=\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss%
}U_{\alpha\alpha}N_{b}/N_{b}=\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}U_{\alpha\alpha},&\\
s_{\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss}\hat{\chi}_{ss}}^{2}=(\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss})^{2}(U%
_{\alpha\alpha}^{2}+N_{\alpha\alpha}^{2}(N_{o}-1)&\\
+\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|U_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}(N_{o%
}-1)))N_{b}/N_{b}-m_{\hat{\mathcal{U}}^{sp}\hat{\chi}^{sp}}^{2}&\\
=(\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss})^{2}(N_{\alpha\alpha}^{2}(N_{o}-1)+\sum_{\alpha>%
\beta}(|U_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}(N_{o}-1)))&.\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ) ) italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL = ( italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ) ) end_CELL start_CELL . end_CELL end_ROW
(94)
Thus,
χ α α s s { U α α − ( N b − 1 ) 1 / 2 [ N α α 2 ( N o − 1 ) + ∑ α > β ( | U α β | 2 + | U α β ′ | 2 ( N o − 1 ) ) ] 1 / 2 } ≤ λ min 𝒰 ^ s s χ ^ s s ≤ χ α α s s { U α α − ( N b − 1 ) − 1 / 2 [ N α α 2 ( N o − 1 ) + ∑ α > β ( | U α β | 2 + | U α β ′ | 2 ( N o − 1 ) ) ] 1 / 2 { . \begin{split}\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\Big{\{}U_{\alpha\alpha}-(N_{b}-1)^{1/2}&%
\\
\big{[}{N_{\alpha\alpha}^{2}(N_{o}-1)+\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|U_{\alpha\beta}|^{2%
}+|U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}(N_{o}-1))}\big{]}^{1/2}\Big{\}}&\\
\leq\lambda_{\text{min}}^{\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss}\hat{\chi}_{ss}}\leq\chi_{%
\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\Big{\{}U_{\alpha\alpha}-(N_{b}-1)^{-1/2}\big{[}N_{\alpha%
\alpha}^{2}(N_{o}-1)&\\
+\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|U_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}(N_{o%
}-1))\big{]}^{1/2}\Big{\{}.&\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT { italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL [ italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ≤ italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT { italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT { . end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(95)
Now, the homogeneous orbital eigenvalues grow with the number of bands and with the Hubbard-like terms, which are typically larger than the exchange terms, suggesting max α c = max − λ min 𝒰 ^ s s χ ^ s s > max − λ min 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p subscript 𝛼 𝑐 superscript subscript 𝜆 min subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝜆 min subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 \max\alpha_{c}=\max-\lambda_{\text{min}}^{\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss}\hat{\chi}_{ss%
}}>\max-\lambda_{\text{min}}^{\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{sp}\hat{\chi}_{sp}} roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_max - italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > roman_max - italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .
However, to become negative, the higher bound of λ min 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p superscript subscript 𝜆 min subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 \lambda_{\text{min}}^{\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{sp}\hat{\chi}_{sp}} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT needs to overpass a typically small quantity, J α α ′ subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha} italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
Reaching the necessary negative sign, is achieved by two mechanisms. One of them is the contribution of the different-sublattice terms and the other is by increasing the number of orbitals.
Thus, the sublattice structure or the multiorbital character of a system can cause charge fluctuations to play a role for the system’s ground state.
Finally, we compare the influence of charge and spin fluctuations by means of the Stoner parameters derived above.
In sum, we obtained (changing λ min 𝒰 ^ s s / s p χ ^ s s / s p superscript subscript 𝜆 min subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 𝑠 𝑝 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 𝑠 𝑝 \lambda_{\text{min}}^{\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss/sp}\hat{\chi}_{ss/sp}} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s / italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s / italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT by λ max − 𝒰 ^ s s / s p χ ^ s s / s p superscript subscript 𝜆 max subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 𝑠 𝑝 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 𝑠 𝑝 \lambda_{\text{max}}^{-\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss/sp}\hat{\chi}_{ss/sp}} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s / italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s / italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )
λ max 𝒱 ^ α α s p χ ^ α α s p = χ α α s p ( J α α ′ + U α α ′ ) , superscript subscript 𝜆 max superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 \begin{split}\lambda_{\text{max}}^{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\hat{%
\chi}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}}=\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}(J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}+%
U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha})&,\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_CELL start_CELL , end_CELL end_ROW
(96)
χ α α s s ( U α α + J α α ) ≤ λ max 𝒱 ^ α α s s χ ^ α α s s ≤ χ α α s s ( U α α + J α α ( N o − 1 ) ) , superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 superscript subscript 𝜆 max superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 \begin{split}\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}(U_{\alpha\alpha}+J_{\alpha\alpha})\leq%
\lambda_{\text{max}}^{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha%
\alpha}^{ss}}\leq\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}(U_{\alpha\alpha}+J_{\alpha\alpha}(N_%
{o}-1)),&\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ≤ italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ) , end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(97)
χ α α s p { − J α α ′ + ( 2 N s − 1 ) − 1 / 2 [ ( − U α α ′ + 2 J α α ) 2 + ∑ α > β ( | J α β ′ | 2 + | J α β | 2 ) ] 1 / 2 } ≤ λ max − 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p ≤ χ α α s p { − J α α ′ + ( 2 N s − 1 ) 1 / 2 [ ( − U α α ′ + 2 J α α ) 2 + ∑ α > β ( | J α β ′ | 2 + | J α β | 2 ) ] 1 / 2 } , superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 superscript 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 1 1 2 superscript delimited-[] superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 2 1 2 superscript subscript 𝜆 max subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 superscript 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 1 1 2 superscript delimited-[] superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 2 1 2 \begin{split}\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\Big{\{}-J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}+(2N_{s%
}-1)^{-1/2}\big{[}(-U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}+2J_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}&\\
+\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|J^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|J_{\alpha\beta}|^{2})\big%
{]}^{1/2}\Big{\}}&\\
\leq\lambda_{\text{max}}^{-\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{sp}\hat{\chi}_{sp}}\leq\chi_{%
\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\Big{\{}-J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}+(2N_{s}-1)^{1/2}\big{[}(-%
U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}&\\
+2J_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}+\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|J^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|J_%
{\alpha\beta}|^{2})\big{]}^{1/2}\Big{\}},&\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT { - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ( 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ ( - italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ≤ italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT { - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ( 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ ( - italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + 2 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } , end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(98)
χ α α s s { − U α α + ( N b − 1 ) − 1 / 2 [ ( 2 U α α ′ − J α α ) 2 ( N o − 1 ) + ∑ α > β ( | U α β | 2 + | U α β ′ | 2 ( N o − 1 ) ) ] 1 / 2 } ≤ λ max − 𝒰 ^ s s χ ^ s s ≤ χ α α s s { − U α α + ( N b − 1 ) 1 / 2 [ ( 2 U α α ′ − J α α ) 2 ( N o − 1 ) + ∑ α > β ( | U α β | 2 + | U α β ′ | 2 ( N o − 1 ) ) ] 1 / 2 } . superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑏 1 1 2 superscript delimited-[] superscript 2 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 1 2 superscript subscript 𝜆 max subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑏 1 1 2 superscript delimited-[] superscript 2 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 1 2 \begin{split}\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\Big{\{}-U_{\alpha\alpha}+(N_{b}-1)^{-1/2%
}\big{[}(2U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}-J_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}(N_{o}-1)&\\
+\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|U_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}(N_{o%
}-1))\big{]}^{1/2}\Big{\}}&\\
\leq\lambda_{\text{max}}^{-\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss}\hat{\chi}_{ss}}\leq\chi_{%
\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\Big{\{}-U_{\alpha\alpha}+(N_{b}-1)^{1/2}\big{[}(2U^{\prime}%
_{\alpha\alpha}&\\
-J_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}(N_{o}-1)+\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|U_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|U^{%
\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}(N_{o}-1))\big{]}^{1/2}\Big{\}}.&\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT { - italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ ( 2 italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ≤ italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT { - italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ ( 2 italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL - italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } . end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(99)
Increasing the number of orbitals highers the lower bound of max α c subscript 𝛼 𝑐 \max\alpha_{c} roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT but does not influence the lower bound of max α s subscript 𝛼 𝑠 \max\alpha_{s} roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
Changing the number of sublattice sites does not influence the boundaries of the spin channel, while it highly favors the charge channel.
Also, once J α α ′ subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha} italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a small quantity, it becomes more likely for the current orbital terms λ max − 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p superscript subscript 𝜆 max subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 \lambda_{\text{max}}^{-\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{sp}\hat{\chi}_{sp}} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT to dominate the fluctuations scenario.
This homogeneous versus current competition clearly shows the strong dependence on the bare susceptibility to the physical state observed in the system, which emphasizes the role of doping for these ground state transitions.
Next, we analyze the spin-charge fluctuation transitions case by case.
{outline}
\1 max α c > max α s subscript 𝛼 𝑐 subscript 𝛼 𝑠 \max\alpha_{c}>\max\alpha_{s} roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT case (lower bound of max α c > subscript 𝛼 𝑐 absent \max\alpha_{c}> roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > higher bound of max α s subscript 𝛼 𝑠 \max\alpha_{s} roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )
\2 If χ α α s s superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 \chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss} italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the main channel, then λ max − 𝒰 ^ s s χ ^ s s superscript subscript 𝜆 max subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 \lambda_{\text{max}}^{-\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss}\hat{\chi}_{ss}} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and λ max 𝒱 ^ α α s s χ ^ α α s s superscript subscript 𝜆 max superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 \lambda_{\text{max}}^{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha%
\alpha}^{ss}} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT compete:
χ α α s s { − U α α + ( N b − 1 ) − 1 / 2 [ ( 2 U α α ′ − J α α ) 2 ( N o − 1 ) + ∑ α > β ( | U α β | 2 + | U α β ′ | 2 ( N o − 1 ) ) ] 1 / 2 } > χ α α s s [ U α α + J α α ( N o − 1 ) ] superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝑏 1 1 2 superscript delimited-[] superscript 2 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 1 2 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 delimited-[] subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 \begin{split}\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\Big{\{}-U_{\alpha\alpha}+(N_{b}-1)^{-1/2%
}\big{[}(2U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}-J_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}(N_{o}-1)&\\
+\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|U_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}(N_{o%
}-1))\big{]}^{1/2}\Big{\}}&\\
>\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\big{[}U_{\alpha\alpha}+J_{\alpha\alpha}(N_{o}-1)\big%
{]}&\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT { - italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ ( 2 italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL > italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ] end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(100)
( 2 U α α ′ − J α α ) 2 ( N o − 1 ) ( N b − 1 ) + 1 ( N b − 1 ) ∑ α > β ( | U α β | 2 + | U α β ′ | 2 ( N o − 1 ) ) > ( 2 U α α + J α α ( N o − 1 ) ) 2 . superscript 2 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 subscript 𝑁 𝑏 1 1 subscript 𝑁 𝑏 1 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 superscript 2 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 2 \begin{split}(2U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}-J_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}\frac{(N_{o}-1)}%
{(N_{b}-1)}+\frac{1}{(N_{b}-1)}\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|U_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}&\\
+|U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}(N_{o}-1))>(2U_{\alpha\alpha}+J_{\alpha\alpha}(%
N_{o}-1))^{2}.&\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL ( 2 italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) end_ARG + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + | italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ) > ( 2 italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(101)
{outline} \1 \3
The increasing number of different sublattice sites plus the lattice geometry can make the∑ α > β ( | U α β | 2 + | U α β ′ | 2 ) subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 \sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|U_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}) ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) term relevant enough to induce the spin-to-charge transition.
\1 If N s = 1 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 1 N_{s}=1 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 , then the transition never happens.
Sublattice geometry is, therefore, essential for the dominating charge fluctuations.
\2 If χ α α s p superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 \chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp} italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the main channel, then λ max − 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p superscript subscript 𝜆 max subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 \lambda_{\text{max}}^{-\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{sp}\hat{\chi}_{sp}} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and λ max 𝒱 ^ α α s p χ ^ α α s p superscript subscript 𝜆 max superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 \lambda_{\text{max}}^{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha%
\alpha}^{sp}} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT compete:
χ α α s p { − J α α ′ + ( 2 N s − 1 ) − 1 / 2 [ ( − U α α ′ + 2 J α α ) 2 + ∑ α > β ( | J α β ′ | 2 + | J α β | 2 ) ] 1 / 2 } > χ α α s p ( J α α ′ + U α α ′ ) superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 superscript 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 1 1 2 superscript delimited-[] superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 2 1 2 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 \begin{split}\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\Big{\{}-J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}+(2N_{s%
}-1)^{-1/2}\big{[}(-U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}+2J_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}&\\
+\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|J^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|J_{\alpha\beta}|^{2})\big%
{]}^{1/2}\Big{\}}>\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}(J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}+U^{\prime%
}_{\alpha\alpha})&\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT { - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ( 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ ( - italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } > italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(102)
( − U α α ′ + 2 J α α ) 2 + ∑ α > β ( | J α β ′ | 2 + | J α β | 2 ) > ( 2 N s − 1 ) ( 2 J α α ′ + U α α ′ ) 2 . superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 2 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 1 superscript 2 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 \begin{split}(-U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}+2J_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}+\sum_{\alpha>%
\beta}(|J^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|J_{\alpha\beta}|^{2})>&\\
(2N_{s}-1)(2J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}+U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}.&\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL ( - italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) > end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ( 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ( 2 italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(103)
{outline} \1 \3
As in the dominating homogeneous channel case, there is no transition without non-trivial sublattice geometry.
{outline}
\1 max α s > max α c subscript 𝛼 𝑠 subscript 𝛼 𝑐 \max\alpha_{s}>\max\alpha_{c} roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT case (lower bound of max α s > subscript 𝛼 𝑠 absent \max\alpha_{s}> roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > higher bound of max α c subscript 𝛼 𝑐 \max\alpha_{c} roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ):
\2 If χ α α s s superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 \chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss} italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the main channel, then λ max − 𝒰 ^ s s χ ^ s s superscript subscript 𝜆 max subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑠 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑠 \lambda_{\text{max}}^{-\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{ss}\hat{\chi}_{ss}} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and λ max 𝒱 ^ α α s s χ ^ α α s s superscript subscript 𝜆 max superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑠 \lambda_{\text{max}}^{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha%
\alpha}^{ss}} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT compete:
χ α α s s { U α α + J α α ) > χ α α s s ( − U α α + ( N b − 1 ) 1 / 2 [ ( 2 U α α ′ − J α α ) 2 ( N o − 1 ) + ∑ α > β ( | U α β | 2 + | U α β ′ | 2 ( N o − 1 ) ) ] 1 / 2 } \begin{split}\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}\Big{\{}U_{\alpha\alpha}+J_{\alpha\alpha}%
)>\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{ss}(-U_{\alpha\alpha}+&\\
(N_{b}-1)^{1/2}\big{[}(2U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}-J_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}(N_{o}-%
1)&\\
+\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|U_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}(N_{o%
}-1))\big{]}^{1/2}\Big{\}}\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT { italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) > italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( - italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ ( 2 italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } end_CELL end_ROW
(104)
( 2 U α α + J α α ) 2 > ( 2 U α α ′ − J α α ) 2 ( N b − 1 ) ( N o − 1 ) + ( N b − 1 ) ∑ α > β ( | U α β | 2 + | U α β ′ | 2 ( N o − 1 ) ) . superscript 2 subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 2 superscript 2 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑏 1 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 subscript 𝑁 𝑏 1 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript 𝑈 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑜 1 \begin{split}(2U_{\alpha\alpha}+J_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}>(2U^{\prime}_{\alpha%
\alpha}-J_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}(N_{b}-1)(N_{o}-1)&\\
+(N_{b}-1)\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|U_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|U^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|%
^{2}(N_{o}-1)).&\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL ( 2 italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > ( 2 italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ) . end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(105)
{outline} \1 \3
The spin fluctuations dominate when the number of bands or orbitals are low (multiband character disadvantages dominating spin fluctuations) or if J α α subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 J_{\alpha\alpha} italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is large.
Also, sublattice geometry disadvantages the spin channel, as previously concluded.
\1 If χ α α s p superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 \chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp} italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the main channel, then λ max − 𝒰 ^ s p χ ^ s p superscript subscript 𝜆 max subscript ^ 𝒰 𝑠 𝑝 subscript ^ 𝜒 𝑠 𝑝 \lambda_{\text{max}}^{-\hat{\mathcal{U}}_{sp}\hat{\chi}_{sp}} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - over^ start_ARG caligraphic_U end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and λ max 𝒱 ^ α α s p χ ^ α α s p superscript subscript 𝜆 max superscript subscript ^ 𝒱 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 superscript subscript ^ 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 \lambda_{\text{max}}^{\hat{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\hat{\chi}_{\alpha%
\alpha}^{sp}} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG caligraphic_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT compete:
χ α α s p ( J α α ′ + U α α ′ ) > χ α α s p { − J α α ′ + ( 2 N s − 1 ) 1 / 2 [ ( − U α α ′ + 2 J α α ) 2 + ∑ α > β ( | J α β ′ | 2 + | J α β | 2 ) ] 1 / 2 } superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 superscript subscript 𝜒 𝛼 𝛼 𝑠 𝑝 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 superscript 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 1 1 2 superscript delimited-[] superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 2 1 2 \begin{split}\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}(J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}+U^{\prime}_{%
\alpha\alpha})>\chi_{\alpha\alpha}^{sp}\Big{\{}-J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}&\\
+(2N_{s}-1)^{1/2}\big{[}(-U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}+2J_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}&\\
+\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|J^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|J_{\alpha\beta}|^{2})\big%
{]}^{1/2}\Big{\}}&\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) > italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT { - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + ( 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ ( - italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(106)
( 2 J α α ′ + U α α ′ ) 2 > ( 2 N s − 1 ) ( − U α α ′ + 2 J α α ) 2 + ( 2 N s − 1 ) ∑ α > β ( | J α β ′ | 2 + | J α β | 2 ) . superscript 2 subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 1 superscript subscript superscript 𝑈 ′ 𝛼 𝛼 2 subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛼 2 2 subscript 𝑁 𝑠 1 subscript 𝛼 𝛽 superscript subscript superscript 𝐽 ′ 𝛼 𝛽 2 superscript subscript 𝐽 𝛼 𝛽 2 \begin{split}(2J^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}+U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}>(2N_{s%
}-1)(-U^{\prime}_{\alpha\alpha}+2J_{\alpha\alpha})^{2}&\\
+(2N_{s}-1)\sum_{\alpha>\beta}(|J^{\prime}_{\alpha\beta}|^{2}+|J_{\alpha\beta}%
|^{2}).&\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL ( 2 italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > ( 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ( - italic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + ( 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α > italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) . end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(107)
{outline} \1 \3
Again, the dominance of spin fluctuations in the current channels is fragile to the number of sublattice sites.
figure 2 in the main text shows a schematics of possible spin-charge interplay scenarios.
Performing a similar analysis for the kernel Γ ~ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ ) = − d 𝒌 | | ′ v F ( 𝒌 ′ ) 1 ( 2 π ) 2 Γ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ ) \tilde{\Gamma}(\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime})=-\frac{d\boldsymbol{k}^%
{\prime}_{||}}{v_{F}(\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime})}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{2}}\Gamma(%
\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime}) over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) = - divide start_ARG italic_d bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT | | end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_ARG divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG roman_Γ ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , which has as eigenvalues the real-valued pairing strengths λ 𝒌 subscript 𝜆 𝒌 \lambda_{\boldsymbol{k}} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (such that the bound theorem holds), we obtain by considering equal number N 𝒌 subscript 𝑁 𝒌 N_{\boldsymbol{k}} italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of 𝒌 𝒌 \boldsymbol{k} bold_italic_k and 𝒌 ′ superscript 𝒌 ′ \boldsymbol{k}^{\prime} bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT points,
m Γ ~ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ ) = tr Γ ~ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ ) / n Γ ~ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ ) = 1 N 𝒌 ∑ 𝒌 Γ ~ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ) , s Γ ~ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ ) 2 = tr Γ ~ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ ) 2 / n Γ ~ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ ) − m Γ ~ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ ) 2 = 1 N 𝒌 ∑ 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ Γ ~ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ ) Γ ~ ( 𝒌 ′ , 𝒌 ) − 1 N 𝒌 ( ∑ 𝒌 Γ ~ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ) ) 2 . formulae-sequence subscript 𝑚 ~ Γ 𝒌 superscript 𝒌 ′ tr ~ Γ 𝒌 superscript 𝒌 ′ subscript 𝑛 ~ Γ 𝒌 superscript 𝒌 ′ 1 subscript 𝑁 𝒌 subscript 𝒌 ~ Γ 𝒌 𝒌 superscript subscript 𝑠 ~ Γ 𝒌 superscript 𝒌 ′ 2 tr ~ Γ superscript 𝒌 superscript 𝒌 ′ 2 subscript 𝑛 ~ Γ 𝒌 superscript 𝒌 ′ superscript subscript 𝑚 ~ Γ 𝒌 superscript 𝒌 ′ 2 1 subscript 𝑁 𝒌 subscript 𝒌 superscript 𝒌 ′
~ Γ 𝒌 superscript 𝒌 ′ ~ Γ superscript 𝒌 ′ 𝒌 1 subscript 𝑁 𝒌 superscript subscript 𝒌 ~ Γ 𝒌 𝒌 2 \begin{split}m_{\tilde{\Gamma}(\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime})}=\text{%
tr}\tilde{\Gamma}(\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime})/n_{\tilde{\Gamma}(%
\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime})}=\frac{1}{N_{\boldsymbol{k}}}\sum_{%
\boldsymbol{k}}\tilde{\Gamma}(\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k}),&\\
s_{\tilde{\Gamma}(\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime})}^{2}=\text{tr}\tilde%
{\Gamma}(\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime})^{2}/n_{\tilde{\Gamma}(%
\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime})}-m_{\tilde{\Gamma}(\boldsymbol{k},%
\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime})}^{2}&\\
=\frac{1}{N_{\boldsymbol{k}}}\sum_{\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime}}%
\tilde{\Gamma}(\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime})\tilde{\Gamma}(%
\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime},\boldsymbol{k})&\\
-\frac{1}{N_{\boldsymbol{k}}}\left(\sum_{\boldsymbol{k}}\tilde{\Gamma}(%
\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k})\right)^{2}.\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = tr over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) / italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k ) , end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = tr over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , bold_italic_k ) end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . end_CELL end_ROW
(108)
Thus, the lower bound for the maximum pairing strength is given by
1 N 𝒌 ∑ 𝒌 Γ ~ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ) + [ 1 N 𝒌 ( N 𝒌 − 1 ) ∑ 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ Γ ~ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ ) Γ ~ ( 𝒌 ′ , 𝒌 ) − 1 N 𝒌 2 ( N 𝒌 − 1 ) ( ∑ 𝒌 Γ ~ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ) ) 2 ] 1 / 2 ≤ λ max Γ ~ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ ) = λ . 1 subscript 𝑁 𝒌 subscript 𝒌 ~ Γ 𝒌 𝒌 superscript delimited-[] 1 subscript 𝑁 𝒌 subscript 𝑁 𝒌 1 subscript 𝒌 superscript 𝒌 ′
~ Γ 𝒌 superscript 𝒌 ′ ~ Γ superscript 𝒌 ′ 𝒌 1 superscript subscript 𝑁 𝒌 2 subscript 𝑁 𝒌 1 superscript subscript 𝒌 ~ Γ 𝒌 𝒌 2 1 2 superscript subscript 𝜆 max ~ Γ 𝒌 superscript 𝒌 ′ 𝜆 \begin{split}\frac{1}{N_{\boldsymbol{k}}}\sum_{\boldsymbol{k}}\tilde{\Gamma}(%
\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k})&\\
+\Bigg{[}\frac{1}{N_{\boldsymbol{k}}(N_{\boldsymbol{k}}-1)}\sum_{\boldsymbol{k%
},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime}}\tilde{\Gamma}(\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime%
})\tilde{\Gamma}(\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime},\boldsymbol{k})&\\
-\frac{1}{N_{\boldsymbol{k}}^{2}(N_{\boldsymbol{k}}-1)}\left(\sum_{\boldsymbol%
{k}}\tilde{\Gamma}(\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k})\right)^{2}\Bigg{]}^{1/2}\leq%
\lambda_{\text{max}}^{\tilde{\Gamma}(\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime})}=%
\lambda.&\\
\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k ) end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + [ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , bold_italic_k ) end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) end_ARG ( ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over~ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_λ . end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(109)
writing as a function of Γ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ ) Γ 𝒌 superscript 𝒌 ′ \Gamma(\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime}) roman_Γ ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) we obtain
λ ≥ − ∑ 𝒌 d 𝒌 | | v F ( 𝒌 ) 1 N 𝒌 ( 2 π ) 2 Γ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ) + [ 1 N 𝒌 ( N 𝒌 − 1 ) ∑ 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ d 𝒌 | | ′ d 𝒌 | | v F ( 𝒌 ′ ) v F ( 𝒌 ) 1 ( 2 π ) 4 Γ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ′ ) Γ ( 𝒌 ′ , 𝒌 ) − 1 N 𝒌 2 ( N 𝒌 − 1 ) ( ∑ 𝒌 d 𝒌 | | v F ( 𝒌 ) 1 ( 2 π ) 2 Γ ( 𝒌 , 𝒌 ) ) 2 ] 1 / 2 . \begin{split}\lambda\geq-\sum_{\boldsymbol{k}}\frac{d\boldsymbol{k}_{||}}{v_{F%
}(\boldsymbol{k})}\frac{1}{N_{\boldsymbol{k}}(2\pi)^{2}}\Gamma(\boldsymbol{k},%
\boldsymbol{k})&\\
+\Bigg{[}\frac{1}{N_{\boldsymbol{k}}(N_{\boldsymbol{k}}-1)}\sum_{\boldsymbol{k%
},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime}}\frac{d\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime}_{||}d\boldsymbol{k}_{%
||}}{v_{F}(\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime})v_{F}(\boldsymbol{k})}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{4}}%
\Gamma(\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime})\Gamma(\boldsymbol{k}^{\prime},%
\boldsymbol{k})&\\
-\frac{1}{N_{\boldsymbol{k}}^{2}(N_{\boldsymbol{k}}-1)}\left(\sum_{\boldsymbol%
{k}}\frac{d\boldsymbol{k}{}_{||}}{v_{F}(\boldsymbol{k})}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{2}}%
\Gamma(\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{k})\right)^{2}\Bigg{]}^{1/2}.&\end{split} start_ROW start_CELL italic_λ ≥ - ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_d bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT | | end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_k ) end_ARG divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG roman_Γ ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k ) end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL + [ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_d bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT | | end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d bold_italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT | | end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_k ) end_ARG divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG roman_Γ ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) roman_Γ ( bold_italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , bold_italic_k ) end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) end_ARG ( ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_d bold_italic_k start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT | | end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_k ) end_ARG divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG roman_Γ ( bold_italic_k , bold_italic_k ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW
(110)
Therefore, the lower bound for λ 𝜆 \lambda italic_λ is enhanced by 𝒒 ≠ 0 𝒒 0 \boldsymbol{q}\neq 0 bold_italic_q ≠ 0 fluctuations.
If several channels are presenting 𝒒 ≠ 0 𝒒 0 \boldsymbol{q}\neq 0 bold_italic_q ≠ 0 peaks, then λ 𝜆 \lambda italic_λ is expected to increase, favoring stronger coupling superconductivity.