Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
License: CC BY 4.0
arXiv:2403.07757v1 [astro-ph.SR] 12 Mar 2024
\UseRawInputEncoding11institutetext: IRAP, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, CNES, UPS, Toulouse, France
11email: cvastel@irap.omp.eu
22institutetext: Graduate School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan 33institutetext: Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Institut de Planétologie et d’Astrophysique de Grenoble (IPAG), 38000 Grenoble, France 44institutetext: Centro de Astrobiologia (CSIC-INTA), Ctra. de Torrejon a Ajalvir, km 4, 28850, Torrejon de Ardoz, Spain 55institutetext: Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik (MPE), Gießenbachstr. 1, D-85741 Garching, Germany 66institutetext: Department of Chemistry, Biology, and Biotechnology, The University of Perugia, Via Elce di Sotto 8, 06123 Perugia, Italy 77institutetext: Excellence Cluster ORIGINS, Boltzmannstraße 2, D-85748 Garching bei München, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Schellingstraße 4, D-80799 München, Germany 88institutetext: Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 99institutetext: National Radio Astronomy Observatory, PO Box O, Socorro, NM 87801, USA 1010institutetext: Astrochemistry Laboratory, Code 691, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 1111institutetext: INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, I-50125, Florence, Italy 1212institutetext: European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild Str. 2, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany 1313institutetext: Cergy Paris Université, Sorbonne Université, Observatoire de Paris, PSL University, CNRS, LERMA, F-95000, Cergy, France 1414institutetext: School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK 1515institutetext: Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Bordeaux, Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, B18N, allée Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 33615, Pessac, France 1616institutetext: Instituto de Radioastronomia y Astrofisica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico Apartado, 58090, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico 1717institutetext: RIKEN Cluster for Pioneering Research, 2-1, Hirosawa, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan 1818institutetext: The Graduate University for Advanced Studies SOKENDAI, Shonan Village, Hayama, Kanagawa 240-0193, Japan 1919institutetext: Research Center for the Early Universe, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Abstract

Context:

Aims:Interstellar complex organic molecules (iCOMs) are species commonly found in the interstellar medium. They are believed to be crucial seed species for the build-up of chemical complexity in star forming regions as well as our own Solar System. Thus, understanding how their abundances evolve during the star formation process and whether it enriches the emerging planetary system is of paramount importance.

Methods:We use data from the ALMA Large Program FAUST (Fifty AU STudy of the chemistry in the disk and envelope system of solar protostars) to study the compact line emission towards the [BHB2007] 11 proto-binary system (sources A and B), where a complex structure of filaments connecting the two sources with a larger circumbinary disk has previously been detected. More than 45 methyl formate (CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO) lines are clearly detected with upper energies in the [123, 366] K range, as well as 8 dimethyl ether transitions (CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT) in the [93, 191] K range, 1 ketene transition (H22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCCO) and 4 formic acid transitions (t-HCOOH). We compute the abundance ratios with respect to CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH for CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO, CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT, H22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCCO, t-HCOOH (as well as an upper limit for CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCHO) through a radiative transfer analysis. We also report the upper limits on the column densities of nitrogen bearing iCOMs, N𝑁Nitalic_N(C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN) and N𝑁Nitalic_N(C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN).

Results:The emission from the detected iCOMs and their precursors is compact and encompasses both protostars, which are separated by only 0.2′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT (similar-to\sim 28 au). The integrated intensities tend to align with the Southern filament, revealed by the high spatial resolution observations of the dust emission at 1.3 mm. A Position-Velocity and 2D analysis are performed on the strongest and uncontaminated CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT transition and show three different spatial and velocity regions, two of them being close to 11B (Southern filament) and the third one near 11A.

Conclusions:All our observations suggest that the detected methanol, as well as the other iCOMs, are generated by the shocked gas from the incoming filaments streaming towards [BHB2007] 11A and 11B, respectively, making this source one of the few where chemical enrichment of the gas caused by the streaming material is observed.

FAUST XI: Enhancement of the complex organic material in the shocked matter surrounding the [BHB2007] 11 protobinary system

C. Vastel 11    T. Sakai 22    C. Ceccarelli 33    I. Jiménez-Serra 44    F. Alves 55    N. Balucani 66    E. Bianchi 77    M. Bouvier 88    P. Caselli 55    C. J. Chandler 99    S. Charnley 1010    C. Codella 1111    M. De Simone 1212    F. Dulieu 1313    L. Evans 1414    F. Fontani 1111    B. Lefloch 1515    L. Loinard 1616    F. Menard 33    L. Podio 1111    G. Sabatini 1111    N. Sakai 1717    S. Yamamoto 18181919
(Received November 11th 2023; accepted February 8th 2024)
Key Words.:
astrochemistry - ISM: abundance - ISM: molecules - line: identification

1 Introduction

Interstellar complex organic molecules (also called iCOMs) are defined in the astronomical community as carbon-bearing species containing at least six atoms (Herbst & van Dishoeck, 2009; Ceccarelli et al., 2017). The detection of iCOMs in solar-type protostars and their precursors in the prestellar core phase is crucial for understanding how molecular complexity emerges and evolves in the different stages that lead to the formation of a solar system such our own. The protostellar phase starts with the young accreting protostar phase with a central object at T \geq 100 K that eventually will become a star, surrounded by a colder envelope from which the future star accretes matter (also called Class 0). In a simple scenario, the molecules trapped in the ices are injected back into the gas phase due to thermal desorption, giving rise to a rich and peculiar chemistry in which iCOMS are found in these regions, called hot corinos (Cazaux et al., 2003; Bottinelli et al., 2004; Ceccarelli, 2004). The name comes from their high-mass analogues, which are called hot cores (Morris et al., 1980). Many iCOMS have been detected in these objects, such as methyl formate (CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO), dimethyl ether (CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT), acetaldehyde (CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCHO), ethanol (CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCH22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH), and formamide (NH22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCHO) (see, e.g., the recent review by Ceccarelli et al., 2023).
In this context, the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) Large Program111http://faust-alma.riken.jp Fifty AU STudy of the chemistry in the disk and envelope system of Solar-like protostars: 2018.1.01205.L (FAUST) is designed to survey the chemical composition of a sample of 13 Class 0/I protostars at a scale of about 50 to 1000 au (all sources have a distance smaller than 250 pc). The description of the project is reported in Codella et al. (2021). One of these sources is the [BHB2007] 11 protobinary system, which is embedded in the darkest parts of the Pipe nebula. This is a quiescent complex of interstellar clouds located at a distance of 163 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 5 pc (Dzib et al., 2018) from the Sun. Only a handful of embedded sources are known in the entire complex in the B59 molecular cloud, with [BHB2007] 11 being the youngest member of a protocluster of low-mass young stellar objects (Brooke et al., 2007). At a higher angular resolution (similar-to\sim 0.04′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT), Alves et al. (2019) previously uncovered a young binary protostar system embedded in circumstellar disks with radii of 2 to 3 au. The protostars are named [BHB2007] 11 A (hereafter 11A) for the northern source and [BHB2007] 11 B (hereafter 11B) for the southern source. Both cores are surrounded by a complex filamentary structure (within similar-to\sim 100′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) connecting to the larger circumbinary disk. Alves et al. (2019) suggested that these filaments are inflow streamers (also called accretion streamers) from the extended circumbinary disk onto the circumstellar disks of the protobinary system. Their CO observations primarily trace the outflow emission, but the high-velocity components indicate acceleration of infalling gas from the circumbinary disk onto [BHB2007] 11 B. No high-velocity components are detected near [BHB2007] 11 A. Evans et al. (2023) recently presented large-scale formaldehyde emission that seems to be consistent with an asymmetric molecular outflow launched by a wide-angle disk wind. Vastel et al. (2022) reported the emission of a compact hot methanol emission with three velocity components at -2, 2.8, and 9.9 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT and surprisingly found that the methanol components are not associated with the dust emission peaks, which would suggest a hot-corino origin. An estimation of the dust opacities using the 225 GHz dust continuum emission, which could lead to a high attenuation of the methanol emission at the dust peak, had uncertainties that were too large for any conclusive evidence of whether the foreground dust could completely attenuate the methanol emission from the hot corinos. Another possibility would be that methanol emission originates from the shocked positions at the intersection of intertwined filaments, leading to a different origin than the classical hot-corino origin. This could result in the sputtering of the grain mantles in these shocked regions due to the streaming of the gas towards 11A and 11B, which impacts the quiescent gas of the circumbinary envelope or, possibly, the two circumstellar disks (Vastel et al., 2022). Evans et al. (2023) also presented some HDCO and D22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCO emission that was only found at the same location of the methanol compact emission, deriving an average D/H ratio of 0.020.01+0.02subscriptsuperscriptabsent0.020.01{}^{+0.02}_{-0.01}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT + 0.02 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 0.01 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.
In the present work, we investigate the iCOM emission found in the FAUST observations towards [BHB2007] 11 as well as some precursors. Our goal is to understand the origin of the detected iCOM emission by locating and comparing it with the most simple iCOM, methanol, which was previously studied by (Vastel et al., 2022). We present in Section 2 the observations and describe in Section 3 the method we used for the line identification of the iCOMs and precursors. Section 4 presents the spatial distribution of isolated transitions in order to determine the location of their emission. To compute the column densities of the species of interest, we perform a radiative transfer analysis of the emission lines in Section 5. A discussion is finally developed in Section 6 to understand the origin of the emission of the iCOMs in [BHB2007] 11 and compare with other protostellar sources.

2 Observations

The observations were centred at α𝛼\alphaitalic_α (2000) = 17h11m23.125s, δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ (2000) = -27{}^{\circ}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT24{}^{\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT32.87′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. They consisted of three frequency setups and 13 spectral windows (spw), as explained in previous FAUST papers on [BHB2007] 11 (Vastel et al., 2022; Evans et al., 2023). Table 1 presents the spw for the FAUST [BHB2007] 11 observations, specifically, those in which detections are presented in this study (in bold), as well as those used to compute the upper limits. All the spw𝑠𝑝𝑤spwitalic_s italic_p italic_w were used to search for transitions of the species of interest. We used the 12m array (TM 1 and TM 2) due to the compact emission of the iCOMs transitions. The bandwidth is 59 MHz for the 12m array, except for the continuum window, with a 1.875 GHz bandwidth. Spectral line imaging was performed with the Common Astronomy Software Applications package (CASA) 5.6.1-8 222https://casa.nrao.edu/ with a modified version of the ALMA calibration pipeline and additional in-house calibration routine333https://faust-imaging.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ (Chandler in prep.). The systemic velocity of [BHB2007] 11 is 3.6 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT with respect to the local standard of rest (Onishi et al., 1999). For the following line identification, we extracted two spectra from the spw continuum bands to cover the broad velocity emission, which extends within 0.82′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ×\times× 0.77′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT centred at α𝛼\alphaitalic_α (2000) = 17h11m23.107s, δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ (2000) = -27{}^{\circ}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT24{}^{\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT33.005′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The two spectra are presented in Fig 1, and the resulting beams and spectral resolutions are quoted in Table 4. Based on the high spatial resolution observations of the dust emission at 1.3 mm with ALMA by Alves et al. (2019), the coordinates for the two cores are α𝛼\alphaitalic_α (2000) = 17h11m23.1058s, δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ (2000) = -27{}^{\circ}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT24{}^{\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT32.828′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT for 11A and α𝛼\alphaitalic_α (2000) = 17h11m23.1015s, δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ (2000) = -27{}^{\circ}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT24{}^{\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT32.987′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT for 11B. There was a small error in the coordinates, as quoted in the Introduction of Vastel et al. (2022).

Table 1: Spectral windows presented in this study for the detected iCOMs (in bold) in the observed FAUST [BHB2007] 11 dataset.
Spectral window setup 1 setup 2 setup 3
(GHz) (GHz) (GHz)
spw 25 216.113 243.916 93.181
spw 27 216.563 244.049 94.405
spw 29 217.105 244.936 95.000a𝑎{}^{a}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT
spw 31 217.822 245.606 107.014
spw 33 218.222 246.700a𝑎{}^{a}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 108.040
spw 35 218.440 260.189 104.239
spw 37 219.560 260.255 105.799
spw 39 219.949 261.687
spw 41 231.061 262.004
spw 43 213.221 257.896
spw 45 231.322 258.256
spw 47 231.410 258.549
spw 49 233.796a𝑎{}^{a}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 259.035
444a𝑎{}^{a}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT: continuum windows. The spw that are not indicated in bold were also used in the search for iCOMs transitions.

3 Line identification

In this section, we describe the line identification method for the exploration of the molecular complexity in [BHB2007] 11. The line identification was performed using the CASSIS555http://cassis.irap.omp.eu software, which connects to the JPL (Pickett et al., 1998) and CDMS (Müller et al., 2005) databases with direct access to VAMDC666http://www.vamdc.org/ as well to verify all the available spectroscopic databases.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Spectra extracted within 0.82′′×0.77′′superscript0.82′′superscript0.77′′0.82^{\prime\prime}\times 0.77^{\prime\prime}0.82 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × 0.77 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT from the two continuum bands (see Table 1). The grey shaded area corresponds to the filled histogram above and below the baseline. All the green lines correspond to the methyl formate transitions. Methanol is indicated in red and formic acid in blue.

3.1 Methyl formate (CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO)

The large bandwidth of the continuum window led to the detection of more than 45 transitions of methyl formate in setup 1 at 233.796 GHz and setup 2 at 259.035 GHz. We also tentatively identified four CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTO1313{}^{13}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 13 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTCHO transitions blended in one broad feature (see discussion in Sec. 5). Table 4 lists the spectroscopic parameters for the lines found in the two continuum bands as well as the transitions detected in the other spw. In the interstellar medium, methyl formate is the most abundant of its isomers, namely acetic acid (CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCOOH, TAG=60523) and glycolaldehyde (HCOCH22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH, TAG=60006), which have not been detected in our observations.

3.2 Dimethyl ether (CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT)

Two strong lines of dimethyl ether were detected at 257.9 GHz and 258.5 GHz (see Table 4). No lines were detected in the continuum spw, probably because the Einstein coefficients are too low to detect any line above the noise: Aulsubscript𝐴𝑢𝑙A_{ul}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT \leq 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT at 233 GHz and Aulsubscript𝐴𝑢𝑙A_{ul}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT \leq 1088{}^{-8}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 8 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT at 246 GHz. In addition, the detected 258.5 GHz line is affected by the emission of a blended transition of CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO (listed in Table 4).

3.3 Formamide (NH22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCHO) and ketene (H22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCCO)

Formamide (NH22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCHO) was targeted in spw 35 of setup 2 through its 122,10210{}_{2,10}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 10 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT–112,929{}_{2,9}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 9 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT transition at 260.190 GHz (see Table 6). A line is indeed present at the quoted frequency at a 0.1 K level. To confirm the detection, we checked for additional transitions with similar spectroscopic parameters (Einstein coefficient, upper energy level, and statistical weight). One transition at 247.391 GHz should present a similar peak intensity given the similar Einstein coefficient, upper level energy, and degeneracy, but it has not been detected at a 4σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ level (0.07 K). Similarly, two other transitions at 234.316 GHz and 233.897 GHz (see Table 6 for the spectroscopic parameters) are not detected either at a 0.1 K rms𝑟𝑚𝑠rmsitalic_r italic_m italic_s. On the other hand, ketene (H22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCCO) seems the most likely candidate with its transition at 260.192 GHz (see Table 4). Unfortunately, there are no other potential transitions for ketene in the continuum spw, and it is the only transition that is covered within our observations. The line width and VLSRsubscript𝑉𝐿𝑆𝑅V_{LSR}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L italic_S italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are compatible with CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH, CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT, and CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO lines at -2, 2.8, and 9.9 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, and we can safely conclude that the species is detected in [BHB2007] 11. Although it is not an iCOM in the strict sense, it is thought to be involved in grain-surface reactions to form iCOMs such as formic acid, ethanol, and acetaldehyde (Charnley, 1997; Charnley & Rodgers, 2008; Garrod et al., 2008; Hudson & Loeffler, 2013; Ferrero et al., 2023, and references therein).

3.4 Formic acid (t-HCOOH)

We also detected formic acid in its trans form. However, only four detectable lines lie in our frequency coverage, three of which are blended with CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO at 246.1 and 247.5 GHz. Although it is not an iCOM by the above strict definition, t-HCOOH is important as it contains three heavy atoms and is the simplest organic acid. The spectroscopic parameters are listed in Table 4.

3.5 Unidentified lines

In addition, two unidentified transitions have been detected at 246.522 GHz and 246.209 GHz that do not correspond to any firm detected transition, according to the CDMS and JPL databases. For the first transition, a CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCDO (TAG=45524) transition (133,11311{}_{3,11}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 11 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 123,10310{}_{3,10}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 10 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT, Eupsubscript𝐸𝑢𝑝E_{up}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 98.14 K, Aulsubscript𝐴𝑢𝑙A_{ul}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5.01 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) lies at that exact frequency (246522.1360 MHz). However, no other transitions with similar Eupsubscript𝐸𝑢𝑝E_{up}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Aulsubscript𝐴𝑢𝑙A_{ul}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT were detected in the continuum spw within the noise. For the second transition, a c-1313{}^{13}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 13 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTCCCH (TAG=38005) transition (NK1,K+1subscript𝐾1subscript𝐾1{}_{K_{-1},K_{+1}}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT = 51,414{}_{1,4}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT–41,313{}_{1,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT, J = 9/2–7/2, F1 = 5–4, F = 11/2–9/2, Eupsubscript𝐸𝑢𝑝E_{up}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 39.54 K, Aulsubscript𝐴𝑢𝑙A_{ul}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3.45 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) lies at the same frequency (246209.0970 MHz). However, no other transitions with similar Eupsubscript𝐸𝑢𝑝E_{up}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Aulsubscript𝐴𝑢𝑙A_{ul}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT were detected in the continuum spw within the noise. No conclusion can be determined so far.

3.6 Non-detected iCOMs

Acetaldehyde

Acetaldehyde (CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCHO) was not detected in our observations. This might be surprising since it is routinely detected in hot corinos (Cazaux et al., 2003; Jørgensen et al., 2016; Bianchi et al., 2022, e.g.) and protostellar shocks (Arce et al., 2008; Lefloch et al., 2017; De Simone et al., 2020b, e.g.). It is the most abundant iCOM after methanol (e.g. Ceccarelli et al., 2023). Twenty potential transitions are spread over the two continuum bands and are listed in Table 6 in the appendix. However, the most likely line candidate for detection in these bands has a low Einstein coefficient (6.6 ×\times× 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT), a relatively high upper energy of 96 K, and is blended with a bright CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO transition (Aulsubscript𝐴𝑢𝑙A_{ul}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 ×\times× 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT).

Nitrogen-bearing iCOMs

We also note that ethyl cyanide (C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN) and vinyl cyanide (C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN), which are often observed in high-mass star-forming regions (Fontani et al., 2007), were not detected. Within the observed frequency range, the C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN transition at 246.2687 GHz and the C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN transition at 247.0870 GHz are expected to be brightest, but neither is detected (see Table 6 in the appendix).

3.7 Other lines

Finally, in the two continuum windows (see Table 1), we identified and detected the CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH  transitions published by Vastel et al. (2022), one HDCO transition published by Evans et al. (2023), two SO22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT transitions, as well as one SO and S3434{}^{34}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 34 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTO transition (to be published in a subsequent FAUST publication).

4 Spatial distribution

The maps presented in the following were obtained using the IRAM/GILDAS777http://www.iram.fr/IRAMFR/GILDAS package (version dec22a). Figure 2 shows the moment 0 maps for the two strong CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT transitions. The spectra from both transitions were extracted from a similar-to\sim 0.4′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT beam size, corresponding to the beam for both transitions (see Table 4), which includes the 11A and 11B cores. This corresponds to similar-to\sim 30σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ for the 258.5 GHz transition (upper energy level of 93 K) and also corresponds to similar-to\sim 4σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ for the 257.9 GHz emission (upper energy level at 191 K). The line profiles are presented in Fig. 3. The 257.911 GHz line profile is more widespread in frequency and does not present a simple three-component feature because of some blending with CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO transitions at 257.9 GHz (see Table 4, EupsubscriptEup\rm E_{up}roman_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_up end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 306.01 K). The 258.549 GHz transition of dimethyl ether is the strongest line of the detected iCOMs presented in this study that is not affected by blending from other transitions. The profile is a simple three-fit Gaussian, and we used it to try to determine the exact location, assuming that the emission is compact. In Fig. 2 (bottom), the image component size deconvolved from the beam for the central component (2.8 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) is more extended than the other, and we cannot yet deduce a clear location (see more details in Sec. 6). Furthermore, we used the unblended 258.549 GHz transition of dimethyl ether to compute the velocity field (moment 1) around [BHB2007] 11. The left side of Fig. 4 shows a clear northwest-southeast gradient centred in between 11A and 11B at the systemic velocity of the source. The same velocity field has been obtained for the methanol transition (Vastel et al., 2022).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Moment 0 maps for the two high spectral resolution CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT transitions. Top: The 257.911 GHz transition. The contours in white start at 4σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ at every 2σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ for 257.911 GHz (1σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ = 22.5 mJy beam11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT). The dust continuum map from Alves et al. (2019) is superposed in cyan. Bottom: The 258.549 GHz transition. The contours in white start at σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ every 6σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ at 258.548 GHz (1σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ = 5.1 mJy beam11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT). The image component sizes deconvolved from the beam are indicated with an ellipse (in cyan) at the -2 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT channel, a dashed ellipse at the 2.8 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT channel, and a dot-dashed ellipse at the 9.9 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT channel. Sources A and B are indicated as filled white circles. In both figures, the ellipse in the bottom left corner represents the ALMA synthesised beam.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Observed transitions of CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT (in black). The best-fit model is superposed in red (corresponding to the LTE modelling of both CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT and CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO  explained in Sect. 5), and the corresponding spectroscopic parameters are listed in Table 4. The transition at 257.911 GHz overlaps with a CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO transition whose best-fit model (based on the many lines detected in our observations) is shown in blue. The grey shaded area corresponds to the filled histogram above and below the baseline.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Velocity analysis based on the CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT  transition at 258.549 GHz. Left: The contours for the velocity field indicate the continuum intensity levels from the high spatial resolution observations of Alves et al. (2019). The compact emission contours arise from the circumstellar disks around each protostar of the binary system, 11A (northern component) and 11B (southern component). The dashed line shows the direction of the cut used to produce the PV diagram displayed in Fig. 4 centred on a position in between the two cores. The cut position angle is 140{}^{\circ}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT and its width is 0.5′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, encompassing both protostars. Right: PV diagram obtained from the CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT emission at 258.549 GHz. The direction of the cut (PA) and its width used to produce the PV diagram is shown on the left side of the figure as a grey dashed line. The three velocity components observed in the methanol spectra are also indicated (Vastel et al., 2022).

In order to better understand the left side of Fig. 4, we created a position-velocity (PV) diagram for the same transition. The PV plot shown on the right side of the figure was produced from a cut oriented parallel to the velocity gradient observed in the moment 1 map of the dimethyl ether emission at 258.549 GHz, whose PA is 140{}^{\circ}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT east of north. The cut width is 0.5′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, comparable to the angular resolution of the FAUST data, and it encompasses cores 11A and 11B, which are separated by 0.2′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. This figure clearly shows the three velocity structures that were identified with methanol (Vastel et al., 2022) and does not show a smooth Keplerian profile over the velocity range from the circumbinary envelope, as was shown using formaldehyde by Alves et al. (2019).

Considering the angular resolution of the present observations, we cannot determine the exact location of the iCOMs emission within the binary system. However, we applied the same method as in Vastel et al. (2022) and present on the left side of Fig. 5 the red- and blueshifted emission for CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT in the high-velocity channels where the S/N is higher than five (the channel at -3.69 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT in the blue and the channel at 11.18 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT in the red). Both components tend to be aligned with source 11B, like the high-velocity components of the CO emission (Alves et al., 2019) and the methanol emission (Vastel et al., 2022). The emission in the 2.8 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT channel (yellow) peaks near 11A in the same way as CO and CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH. The three CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT components appear in a compact configuration that is compatible with the compact emission seen in the moment 0 map (see Fig. 2).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Analysis of the origin of the observed dimethyl ether components. Left: Contour map emission at 258.549 GHz for the two most extreme velocities detected at 3σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ at the -3.69 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT channel (blue) and at the 11.86 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT channel (red), as well as the central peak channel at 2.8 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT (orange). The contours start at 4σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ every 1σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ. The dust continuum map from Alves et al. (2019) is superposed in black. Right: Position of intensity peaks (circles) from the 2D Gaussian fit of the emission of the CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT line transition at 258.549 GHz in each velocity channel separated by 0.14similar-toabsent0.14\sim 0.14∼ 0.14 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT plotted over the dust continuum map of Alves et al. (2019). The colour code for the edges of the circle is red for the 9.2 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT component (\geq 6 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT), yellow for the 3 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT component (]1,6[]1,6[] 1 , 6 [ km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ), and blue for the -1.9 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT component (<<<1 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT), while the CO (2–1) high-velocity components are shown in bright green. The circle size is defined by the uncertainty on the absolute position of the emission peak in each velocity component (the largest circle has 0.02′′similar-toabsentsuperscript0.02′′\sim 0.02^{\prime\prime}∼ 0.02 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT given by θ𝜃\thetaitalic_θ/(2xS/N), as explained in the text of Sect. 4).

Since the iCOMs emission in each velocity channel is compact and centrally peaked, we performed 2D Gaussian fits on the CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT transition at 258.549 GHz (the strongest unblended transition with a high S/N) in each channel to obtain the position of their intensity peak in the three components [-5, 1] km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, [1, 6] km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, and [6, 13] km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The right side of Fig. 5 shows this 2D analysis. The accuracy on the relative position is given by θ/(2×S/N)𝜃2𝑆𝑁\theta/(2\times S/N)italic_θ / ( 2 × italic_S / italic_N ), where θ𝜃\thetaitalic_θ is the synthesised beam size, and S/N is the signal-to-noise ratio of the peak with respect to the map noise (Condon, 1997; Condon et al., 1998). Consequently, the uncertainty on the position will be lower for higher S/N line intensities. In other words, a centroid fitting to the compact molecular emission yields astrometry with a precision better than that of the spatial resolution in the case of a high S/N. For this calculation, we only considered intensity peaks brighter than five times its Gaussian fit error and a S/N higher than ten, corresponding to a position accuracy better than 0.02′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. This 2D analysis is similar to our analysis of methanol, except for the middle component at similar-to\sim 3 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, which is more localised on the B source instead of in between the two cores. We note, however, the limited number of channels satisfying the requirements (S/N >>> 10, intensity/error >>> 5) compared to methanol. Fig. 5 (right) shows no clear acceleration of the iCOMs material towards [BHB2007] 11 B (circles with red edges for velocities greater than 6 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT and circles with blue edges for velocities lower than 1 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT), in contrast to what is seen in the high-velocity component of CO (circles with green edges) with a darker colour inside the circles nearby the source.

Many transitions of methyl formate (CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO) were detected in the continuum band (Fig. 1), and Fig. 6 shows the moment 0 maps for three isolated transitions covering a wide upper energy range between 115 and 333 K. The smaller beam of the transition at 233 GHz shows that the emission peaks south of [BHB2007] 11 B appear to clearly show a lack of emission towards [BHB2007] 11 A. There is a good correlation between this higher intensity in the southern region with the kinematic structure in the form of a clear velocity gradient around source [BHB2007] 11 B (see Fig. 5, right). Figure 7 shows the spectra of some isolated transitions of CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO in the continuum spw.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6: Moment 0 maps for some CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO  transitions. The contours start at 4σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ at every 2σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ (1σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ = 11.7, 16.7, and 8.3 mJy beam11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT at 233.8, 234.1, and 247.5 GHz, respectively). The ellipses in the bottom left corners represent the ALMA synthesised beams. Sources A and B are indicated as filled white circles in the top and middle panels. The dust continuum map from Alves et al. (2019) is shown in white contours in the bottom panel.
Refer to caption
Figure 7: Example of isolated CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO transitions observed within 0.8′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT (in black). The best-fit model is superposed in red, and the corresponding spectroscopic parameters are listed in Table 4. The corresponding VLSRsubscript𝑉𝐿𝑆𝑅V_{LSR}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L italic_S italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for the three components are -1.9, 3.0, and 9.2 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT , and for the FWHM, they are 2, 5, 4 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, respectively. The grey shaded area corresponds to the filled histogram above and below the baseline.

The left side of Fig. 8 shows the moment 0 map for the only transition of ketene, again, with an enhancement in intensity in the southern region of 11B, following the filament traced with the dust continuum emission presented by Alves et al. (2019), as shown in Fig. 5 (right).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 8: Analysis of the observed ketene transition. Left: Moment 0 map at 260.192 GHz. The contours start at 4σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ at every 2σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ. The ellipse in the bottom left corner represents the ALMA synthesised beam (0.44′′×0.37′′superscript0.44′′superscript0.37′′0.44^{\prime\prime}\times 0.37^{\prime\prime}0.44 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × 0.37 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT). Sources A and B identified by Alves et al. (2019) are indicated as filled white circles. Right: H22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCCO transition at 260.192 GHz. The red line corresponds to the modelled transitions as described in Sect. 5. The grey shaded area corresponds to the filled histogram above and below the baseline.

5 Radiative transfer modelling

We first performed a local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) analysis to estimate the CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH and CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH abundance ratios. The methanol column density was computed from non-LTE modelling using its 1313{}^{13}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 13 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTC isotopologue (Vastel et al., 2022). For methyl formate and dimethyl ether, we extracted the spectra from the same region as for the CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT  transition at 257.911 GHz, corresponding to similar-to\sim 0.4′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. We then used the parameters (column density, source size, and kinetic temperatures) found from the non-LTE modelling of the methanol transitions (see Vastel et al., 2022) to compute the column densities of CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT and CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO using the CASSIS software. We fixed the source sizes and let the best-fit model converge around the VLSRsubscript𝑉𝐿𝑆𝑅V_{LSR}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L italic_S italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT line width for the Gaussian fits and the kinetic temperatures of methanol for the excitation temperatures of the three components. We then let the source size vary. Table 2 lists the results from the best fit obtained using all transitions in both continuum windows and in setup 2, spw 47 and 43, taking into account the blended lines of CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT  and CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO. Figures 3 and 7 show the best-fit LTE model (in red) obtained by simultaneously fitting all lines of CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT  and CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO. The corresponding VLSRsubscript𝑉𝐿𝑆𝑅V_{LSR}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L italic_S italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for the three components are -1.9, 3.0, and 9.2 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, and the FWHM values are 2, 5, and 4 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT respectively.
With methanol as a reference, the CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH ratio is [5, 8] ×\times× 1033{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT and the CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH ratio is [2.5, 4.5] ×\times× 1022{}^{-2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT for the three components.

Table 2: Results from the LTE analysis based on the non-LTE results from methanol.
Velocity components
-2 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2.8 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 9.9 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT
N(CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH) (cm22{}^{-2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) (1.4±0.6plus-or-minus1.40.61.4\pm 0.61.4 ± 0.6) ×1018absentsuperscript1018\times 10^{18}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 18 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (4.0±1.0plus-or-minus4.01.04.0\pm 1.04.0 ± 1.0) ×1018absentsuperscript1018\times 10^{18}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 18 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (3.0±0.8plus-or-minus3.00.83.0\pm 0.83.0 ± 0.8) ×1018absentsuperscript1018\times 10^{18}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 18 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
T (K) 110±10plus-or-minus11010110\pm 10110 ± 10 130±10plus-or-minus13010130\pm 10130 ± 10 130±10plus-or-minus13010130\pm 10130 ± 10
nH2subscript𝐻2{}_{H_{2}}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT (cm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) (1.00.5+3subscriptsuperscript1.030.51.0^{+3}_{-0.5}1.0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 0.5 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) ×107absentsuperscript107\times 10^{7}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 7 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (2.0±0.5plus-or-minus2.00.52.0\pm 0.52.0 ± 0.5) ×106absentsuperscript106\times 10^{6}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (2.5±2.2plus-or-minus2.52.22.5\pm 2.22.5 ± 2.2) ×107absentsuperscript107\times 10^{7}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 7 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
θSsubscript𝜃𝑆\theta_{S}italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) 0.15′′±0.10′′plus-or-minussuperscript0.15′′superscript0.10′′0.15^{\prime\prime}\pm 0.10^{\prime\prime}0.15 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± 0.10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0.13′′±0.10′′plus-or-minussuperscript0.13′′superscript0.10′′0.13^{\prime\prime}\pm 0.10^{\prime\prime}0.13 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± 0.10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0.12±′′0.10′′{}^{\prime\prime}\pm 0.10^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ± 0.10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
N(CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO) (cm22{}^{-2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) [1.0, 3.4] ×1016absentsuperscript1016\times 10^{16}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 16 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [2.2, 10.0] ×1016absentsuperscript1016\times 10^{16}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 16 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [3.0, 13.0] ×1016absentsuperscript1016\times 10^{16}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 16 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
N(CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT) (cm22{}^{-2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) [3.5, 11.0] ×1015absentsuperscript1015\times 10^{15}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [6, 20] ×1015absentsuperscript1015\times 10^{15}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [6, 25] ×1015absentsuperscript1015\times 10^{15}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
N(t-HCOOH) (cm22{}^{-2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) [0.6, 2.5] ×1015absentsuperscript1015\times 10^{15}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [0.55, 1.5] ×1015absentsuperscript1015\times 10^{15}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [1.0, 3.5] ×1015absentsuperscript1015\times 10^{15}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
N(H22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCCO) (cm22{}^{-2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) [2.5, 20] ×1014absentsuperscript1014\times 10^{14}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 14 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [6, 25] ×1014absentsuperscript1014\times 10^{14}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 14 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [4, 20] ×1014absentsuperscript1014\times 10^{14}× 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 14 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
θSsubscript𝜃𝑆\theta_{S}italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) [0.15, 0.30] [0.13, 0.26] [0.12, 0.24]
Tex𝑒𝑥{}_{ex}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT (K) [80, 100] [80, 100] [80, 100]
888The methanol non-LTE analysis and the three velocity components identifications are from Vastel et al. (2022).

We detected a line at 246.79 GHz (see Fig. 11) that may correspond to the blending of four 13C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT methyl formate (CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTO1313{}^{13}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 13 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTCHO) transitions. The spectroscopic parameters are listed in Table 6. Many lines have previously been detected in the spectrum of the Orion star-forming region (Carvajal et al., 2009) at the IRc2 position. Combining our CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO column density with its isotopologue, we used a 1212{}^{12}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 12 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTC/1313{}^{13}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 13 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTC ratio of 68 (Milam et al., 2005) to compute a CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTO1313{}^{13}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 13 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTCHO ratio of [1.5, 5.0] ×\times× 101414{}^{14}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 14 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, [3.2, 15] ×\times× 101414{}^{14}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 14 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT and [4.4, 19] ×\times× 101414{}^{14}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 14 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT cm22{}^{-2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. With the same source size and excitation temperatures as for CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO and CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT, the modelled transitions using an LTE radiative transfer analysis in the two continuum bands are compatible with the observations within the noise. However, the LTE spectrum (Fig. 11, at the frequency of the middle group of 246788.406 MHz) presents a shift in velocity for the three components that might be explained by an unidentified transition at this position that is not reported in the CDMS and JPL databases, or by an incorrect frequency in the CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTO1313{}^{13}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 13 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTCHO database. The quoted uncertainty of the database frequency is only 2 kHz, which cannot explain this shift. The 246.788 GHz line also appears in the Orion spectra (Fig. 2 of Carvajal et al., 2009), and it is well underestimated by the model with a clear shift as well. However, the authors did not explain this particular shift. Considering the noise and the spectral resolution of our observations for this transition, we cannot conclude on a firm detection of the methyl formate isotopologue.

We used the CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO and CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT LTE modelling to obtain a good estimate of the formic acid column density. The 246.106 and 247.514 GHz lines are blended with methyl formate and are underestimated by the LTE model when formic acid is not taken into account. Taking the three components with the same beam size, excitation temperature, and VLSRsubscript𝑉𝐿𝑆𝑅V_{LSR}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L italic_S italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as derived from the methyl formate and dimethyl ether into account, we obtained the column densities quoted in Table 2. The 246.106 and 247.514 GHz lines are now better reproduced by the LTE model. When methanol is again used as a reference, we obtain a t-HCOOH/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH  ratio of [0.01, 0.5] %percent\%%.

We present on the right side of Fig. 8 the only transition for ketene, as discussed in Sect. 3. The column densities can be constrained from the LTE modelling, again using the excitation temperature, filling factor, and FWHM as for CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT and CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO. The results are presented in Table 2 with a H22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCCO/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH ratio of [0.01, 0.1] %percent\%%, which is very similar to the t-HCOOH/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH ratio.

An upper limit for acetaldehyde column density can be estimated at about 1/70th compared to the methanol column density. In Fig. 7, the transition at 234.486 GHz (see Table 4) is not well reproduced. However, it might be contaminated by an acetaldehyde transition at 234.486 GHz (see Table 6), which is within the upper limit value calculated above (0.15 K for this transition for a 0.115 K rms𝑟𝑚𝑠rmsitalic_r italic_m italic_s). We also evaluated the upper limit of the C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN and C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN column densities for each velocity component with the LTE analysis. The derivation of the upper limits is described in the appendix. We obtained C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH and C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH to be <<<0.066 % and <<<0.018 %, respectively.

6 Discussion

6.1 Origin of the emission of iCOMs in [BHB2007] 11

The spatial distribution of iCOMs in hot corinos around Class 0 protostars is known to be compact and to peak at the location of the dust continuum peak, which corresponds to the location of the central source (see e.g. López-Sepulcre et al., 2017; Jørgensen et al., 2018). In contrast, [BHB2007] 11 shows hot methanol gas that is not exactly associated with the location of the central protostars of the binary system, 11A and 11B, but distributed across the circumbinary disk (Vastel et al., 2022). Even though the binary system cannot be resolved in the FAUST images, the 2D Gaussian centroid map of the hot methanol line at 243.916 GHz reveals that this emission appears to be slightly offset with respect to 11A (similar-to\sim 20 au) and towards the north-west and south-east of 11B (similar-to\sim 20 au from the hot core), at the intersection between filaments seen in the dust emission. The non-LTE analysis of the methanol lines tells us that the gas is hot (similar-to\sim 120 K) and dense [0.2, 25] ×\times× 1077{}^{7}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 7 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT cm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT (Vastel et al., 2022). The dust in between 11A and 11B could be warm enough for the methanol to sublimate, but the iCOM emission does not peak on the hot cores themselves, which seems to rule this hypothesis out. Alternatively, the hot methanol gas could be associated with shocked gas. From the theoretical point of view, shocks may occur in mass-transferring binary systems, where spiral shocks are induced by disturbances and accretion within the disk (Spruit, 1987; Ju et al., 2016). They also occur as streaming gas from the circumbinary disk to the circumstellar disks (Mösta et al., 2019) and impact streams close to the inner edge of the circumbinary disk (Shi et al., 2012).

In Vastel et al. (2022), we proposed that hot methanol arises from shocked gas associated with an accretion gas streamer falling onto source 11B, which induces a shock interaction that is strong enough to inject species from the ice mantles in the gas phase. The impact is sufficient to overcome the binding energies, and this mechanism is called sputtering (e.g. Draine, 1995). Alves et al. (2019) already suggested that the filaments surrounding [BHB2007] 11 are accretion streamers from the extended circumbinary disk onto the circumstellar disks of the protobinary system, from large- to small-scale structures. This streaming material would impact either on the quiescent gas of the circumbinary envelope or possibly on the two circumstellar disks. Recently, the impact of these accreting streamers on the gas chemical enrichment has been observed in some very few sources, in addition to the indirect case of [BHB2007] 11 : the Class II sources DG Tau and HL Tau (Garufi et al., 2022), and the Class I source SVS13 A (Bianchi et al., 2023; Hsieh et al., 2023). In addition, only a few simple species have been detected in these streamer-triggered shocks so far: SO, SO22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT, DCN, and HDO (Garufi et al., 2022; Hsieh et al., 2023), and only one iCOM, formamide (Bianchi et al., 2023). In this context, it is very important to assess whether the detected methyl formate, dimethyl ether, formic acid, and ketene towards [BHB2007] 11 can be attributed to shocks caused by gas streamers because this would be the richest gas enrichment observed so far. On the right side of Fig. 5, we showed that the emission from hot CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT gas presents a 2D Gaussian centroid distribution that is similar to the distribution for hot methanol, indicating that the two species are affected by the same physical process. The moment 0 maps of CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT and CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO presented in Fig. 2 and 6 clearly show a shifted peaked emission in the southern region of 11B. This southern emission can be compared with the high spatial resolution dust continuum map from Alves et al. (2019), where the two hot cores are identified with a complex filamentary structure in their surroundings (right side of Fig. 5). This supports the idea of the release into the gas phase of molecular species from shocks close to 11B rather than the emission from thermally desorbed species. In the latter case, the emission should have been symmetric and centred towards the two sources, 11A and 11B, whereas the maps show a compact emission in the southern position alone. On the other hand, the moment 0 map of ketene (see Fig. 8) shows that the emission is likely peaked in between 11A and 11B. In addition, it shows extended emission that follows the bright southern filament (Fig. 5) observed by Alves et al. (2019) in the dust continuum. Therefore, ketene could be tracing a more extended region, likely the warm gas streaming in from the circumbinary disk, rather than the shocked regions at the end of the streamer.

The compact emission of iCOMs and the more extended emission of ketene would not be surprising from a chemical point of view. While iCOMs have very low abundances in cold (20absent20\leq 20≤ 20 K) gas (e.g. Vastel et al., 2014; Jiménez-Serra et al., 2016)because of their formation routes and binding energies (e.g. Ceccarelli et al., 2023), ketene is observed in cold gas with an abundance about a factor 10 higher than iCOMs (e.g. Jaber et al., 2014; Vastel et al., 2014), in agreement with the more extended emission in our observations.

As mentioned in the Introduction, the protobinary system is still deeply embedded in its natal cloud and far from any variable stars. Therefore, although external irradiation could produce shifted emission of molecular species from a protostellar core like this (e.g. Lindberg & Jørgensen, 2012; Lindberg et al., 2015), the location of [BHB2007] 11 and the derived high gas temperature at which the iCOMs are emitted rules this possibility out.

In summary, our observations suggest that the shocks caused by the streaming gas crashing onto quiescent material surrounding [BHB2007] 11, likely its circumbinary disk, enrich the gas in iCOMs. We clearly detect methanol, methyl formate, and dimethyl ether, which are among the iCOMs with the highest observed abundances in molecular shocks: X(CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH)=(5.0±plus-or-minus\pm±1.0)×\times×1077{}^{-7}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 7 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, X(CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO)=(2.7±plus-or-minus\pm±0.7)×\times×1088{}^{-8}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 8 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, and X(CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT)=(2.5±plus-or-minus\pm±0.7)×\times×1088{}^{-8}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 8 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT for L1157-B1 (Lefloch et al., 2017), and CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTsimilar-to\sim 1 for the IRAS 4A outflow (De Simone et al., 2020b).

6.2 Comparison with other protostellar sources

The possible presence of shocks associated with accretion or ejection occurring very close to the central accreting objects and at the origin of iCOM emission, such as in [BHB2007] 11, has also been invoked towards G328.2551-0.5321 Csengeri et al. (2019), IRAS16293 A (Maureira et al., 2022), and SVS13A (Bianchi et al., 2023). Towards the high-mass star-forming region G328.2551-0.5321, Csengeri et al. (2019) reported a differential distribution of some O-bearing iCOMs (ethanol, acetone, and ethylene glycol) with respect to some N-bearing iCOMs (vinyl and ethyl cyanide), as found in [BHB2007] 11, and the other detected iCOMs (e.g. methanol, acetaldehyde, and methyl cyanide). Specifically, the emission from ethanol, acetone, and ethylene glycol peaks roughly perpendicular to the outflow direction and is offset from the continuum emission peak by about 700 au (i.e. one beam), whereas the emission peak of the remaining iCOMs coincides with the dust peak. Csengeri et al. (2019) argued that the iCOM emission offset from the dust peak is due to accretion shocks resulting from the impact of infalling gas. However, higher spatial resolution observations are necessary to resolve the iCOM emission, and thereby, confirm their exact origin (shocks associated with accretion, ejection, or different processes). In addition, our non-detection of C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN and C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN (see the appendix) provides an upper limit to the C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH and C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH abundance ratios of <<<0.07 % and <<<0.02 %, respectively, which are much lower than those measured in G328.2551-0.5321, namely 0.57 and 0.17 %, respectively (Csengeri et al., 2019). Therefore, the comparison between [BHB2007] 11and G328.2551-0.5321 is inconclusive.

In the same context, in IRAS16293 A, (Maureira et al., 2022) found hot (\geq [50, 120] K) spots of dust continuum emission, which the authors interpreted as due to shocks from infalling or outflowing gas very close to the central object (on scales of similar-to\sim10 au). The line emission from formamide and formic acid also seems to be slightly enhanced in these shocks (Maureira et al., 2020, 2022).

It is worth mentioning that the dust opacity could be a major actor in the observed apparent spatial distribution of iCOMs, as shown by Vastel et al. (2022); De Simone et al. (2020a) (see also the discussion in Rivilla et al. (2017) and Lee et al. (2022)). Specifically, De Simone et al. (2020a) showed that towards the hot corino NGC1333 IRAS 4A1, methanol line emission is easily detected in the radio by VLA, but is undetected in the 1 and 2 millimeter by ALMA and NOEMA (e.g. López-Sepulcre et al., 2017). Both G328.2551-0.5321 and IRAS16293 A have high dust column densities, and the observations were carried out at frequencies of about 350 and 220 GHz, respectively, where the dust opacity is likely to be higher than in NGC1333 IRAS 4A1, especially towards G328.2551-0.5321.

Finally, for SVS13A, Bianchi et al. (2023) imaged (on scales of similar-to\sim50 au) three features elongated in the direction of known larger-scale streamers of gas falling towards the two central objects of the binary system VLA4A and VLA4B. The features are enriched in formamide (the only iCOM they searched for in their observations), in addition to HDO and SO22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT. In this case, the image clearly shows formamide emission at the base of the gas streamers. The iCOMs observed towards [BHB2007] 11  are likely due to similar shocks.

To evaluate even further whether the iCOMs emission detected towards [BHB2007] 11  arise from shocked accreting gas, we list in Table 3 the abundance ratios with respect to methanol of the iCOMs and some precursors detected in this work, as measured towards [BHB2007] 11  and of the solar-like Class 0 and I hot corinos of IRAS 16293 A (Manigand et al., 2020) and SVS13A (Bianchi et al., 2019, 2022), respectively, along with the protostellar shock region L1157-B1 (Lefloch et al., 2017). In the following, we briefly discuss the five species reported in the table.

Table 3: Comparison of the detected iCOMs and precursors (relative to methanol) in [BHB2007] 11 with a low-mass protostar (IRAS 16293 A: Manigand et al., 2020), a Class I protostar (SVS 13-A: Bianchi et al., 2019), and a shock position towards a low-mass protostar (L1157-B1: Lefloch et al., 2017; Codella et al., 2015).
X(iCOMs)/X(CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH)
Species [BHB2007] 11 IRAS 16293 A L1157-B1 SVS 13-A
Methyl formate CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO [2.5, 4.5] %percent\%% (2±1)%percentplus-or-minus21(2\pm 1)\%( 2 ± 1 ) % (5.4±plus-or-minus\pm±1.0)%percent\%% (1.9±plus-or-minus\pm±0.4)%percent\%%
Dimethyl ether CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT [0.5, 0.8] %percent\%% (4±2)%percentplus-or-minus42(4\pm 2)\%( 4 ± 2 ) % (4.9±plus-or-minus\pm±1.0)%percent\%% (2.1±plus-or-minus\pm±0.7)%percent\%%
Formic acid t-HCOOH [0.01, 0.5] %percent\%% (0.10±0.04)%percentplus-or-minus0.100.04(0.10\pm 0.04)\%( 0.10 ± 0.04 ) % (1.7±plus-or-minus\pm±0.3)%percent\%% 0.07%absentpercent0.07\leq 0.07\%≤ 0.07 %
Ketene H22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCCO [0.01, 0.1] %percent\%% (0.07±0.03)%percentplus-or-minus0.070.03(0.07\pm 0.03)\%( 0.07 ± 0.03 ) % (1.7±plus-or-minus\pm±0.7)%percent\%% (0.19±plus-or-minus\pm±0.06)%percent\%%
Acetaldehyde CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCHO \leq 1.5%percent\%% (0.03±0.01)%percentplus-or-minus0.030.01(0.03\pm 0.01)\%( 0.03 ± 0.01 ) % (0.6±plus-or-minus\pm±0.10)–(4.2±plus-or-minus\pm±0.1)%percent\%% (0.18±plus-or-minus\pm±0.11)%percent\%%

Methyl formate and dimethyl ether

The CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH  abundance ratio derived in [BHB2007] 11 is consistent with that measured in the Class 0 and I hot corinos of Table 3 (see also Fig. 3 of Bianchi et al. (2019) and Fig. 4 of van Gelder et al. (2020)) as well as towards the shocked region L1157-B1 (Lefloch et al., 2017). Likewise, the CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH  abundance ratio towards [BHB2007] 11  is comparable to that measured in other hot corinos (e.g. Bianchi et al., 2019; van Gelder et al., 2020). Conversely, CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH  is slightly lower than that measured towards the shocked regions L1157-B1 (5%similar-toabsentpercent5\sim 5\%∼ 5 %: Lefloch et al., 2017) and in the outflow shocks of NGC1333 IRAS 4A (10%similar-toabsentpercent10\sim 10\%∼ 10 %: De Simone et al., 2020b). The CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO  abundance ratio [0.1, 0.3] in [BHB2007] 11 lies at the lower end of the correlation observed by several authors between these two molecules (Jaber et al., 2014; Brouillet et al., 2013; Belloche et al., 2020; Coletta et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2021; Chahine et al., 2022). The observed correlation (CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHOsimilar-to\sim 1) may imply a sister-sister or mother-daughter relation between methyl formate and dimethyl ether. Balucani et al. (2015) suggested that the second relation applies: Methyl formate is synthesised from methyl ether via a chain of two gas-phase reactions. Alternatively, both species are synthesised on the grain surfaces (Garrod et al., 2008). However, these routes have been studied theoretically and their efficiency is not obvious, given the competition of the combination of radicals with the H atom abstraction in each reaction (Enrique-Romero et al., 2022). However, the recent model by Garrod et al. (2022) needs the introduction of poorly studied diffusive reactions to enhance the dimethyl ether to the observed values. Chahine et al. (2022) measured CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO equal to 0.2similar-toabsent0.2\sim 0.2∼ 0.2 towards the HOPS-108 hot corino in the OMC-2 FIR 4 protocluster. This value is similar to that measured towards [BHB2007] 11. These authors tried to verify whether a very different cosmic-ray ionisation rate could explain this difference with respect to the other sources. They concluded, however, that cosmic rays do not play a role in shaping the abundance of CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT relative to that of CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO  (see their Fig. B.10). If the two species are linked by gas-phase reactions, another poorly known parameter that could affect the CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT  ratio is the abundance of atomic oxygen, which may be different in the shocked gas of [BHB2007] 11 .

Formic acid

Table 3 shows that the formic acid versus methanol ratio estimated in our observations is lower by a factor of 3 than the shocked region of L1157 (Lefloch et al., 2017), but comparable to the value found in IRAS 16293 B (Manigand et al., 2020).

Ketene

Like in the case of formic acid, the H22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCCO/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH  abundance ratio in [BHB2007] 11  is more similar to that measured in hot corinos than in the L1157-B1 shock. However, the latter is the only reported ketene detection in a shocked region so far, and it is therefore premature to draw firm conclusions. In addition, we report that in [BHB2007] 11, ketene emission is more extended than in the other detected iCOMs (see Sec. 4), which is an argument for an origin in the gas phase likely belonging to the extended envelope surrounding [BHB2007] 11. As several simple hydrocarbons, ketene is observed in hot and cold gas (e.g. Jaber et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2022). In the gas phase, it is formed from the oxidation of smaller hydrocarbons (e.g. C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT + O), while on the grain surface, it can be formed by the reaction of C atoms landing on CO-rich ice (Ferrero et al., 2023). In the case of [BHB2007] 11, the extended emission would be more easily explained by gas-phase reactions.

Acetaldehyde

Table 3 shows that the upper limit that we derived from the observations towards [BHB2007] 11  is consistent with the values observed in hot corino IRAS 16293 B (Manigand et al., 2020) and the shocked region L1157-B1 (Lefloch et al., 2017). Our rms𝑟𝑚𝑠rmsitalic_r italic_m italic_s is too high to be able to explain the non-detection of this species.

7 Conclusions

We presented the ALMA observations towards the protobinary system [BHB2007] 11 within the framework of the FAUST Large Program. We reported the detection of iCOMs and iCOMs precursors, such as CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT, CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO, t-HCOOH, and H22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCCO. The spatial distribution showed that the emission is confined within the ALMA beam, and the velocity distribution shows three different spatial regions. They are comparable with the methanol emission from previous observations of Vastel et al. (2022). The detected iCOMs are associated with three hot spots, two of which lie close to 11B, and the third hot spot lies near 11A, with a source size of similar-to\sim 0.15′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, which is well below the similar-to\sim 0.4′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT beam size. These molecular species are likely the result of the shocked material from the incoming filaments that streams towards [BHB2007] 11 A and B, shown in our integrated intensity maps compared to the dust emission revealing the filamentary structures. Radiative transfer modelling was used to reproduce the many detected transitions and compute the abundance ratios with respect to methanol for methyl formate, dimethyl ether, ketene, formic acid, and an upper limit for acetaldehyde. We then compared the ratios to Class 0 and Class I protostars as well as with the L1157-B1 shocked region. The CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH as well as CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCHO/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH ratios are similar in all sources, but H22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCCO/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH and t-HCOOH/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOH are much lower. Our CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT/CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO ratio of [0.1, 0.3] is slightly lower (factor of 3 to 10) than the correlation found in low- and high-mass protostars. Our observations suggest that the shocks caused by the streaming gas crashing onto quiescent material surrounding [BHB2007] 11 can enrich the gas in iCOMs.

Acknowledgements.
This project has received funding within the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program from the European Research Council (ERC) for the project The Dawn of Organic Chemistry (DOC, grant agreement No. 741002) and for the project Dust2Planets (grant agreement No. 101053020), and from the Marie Sklodowska-Curie action for the project Astro-Chemical Origins (ACO, grant agreement No. 811312). S.B.C. was supported by the NASA Planetary Science Division Internal Scientist Funding Program through the Fundamental Laboratory Research work package (FLaRe). M.B. acknowledges support from the ERC under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program MOPPEX 833460. I.J-.S acknowledges funding from grants No. PID2019-105552RB-C41 and PID2022-136814NB-I00 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation/State Agency of Research MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF A way of making Europe. S.Y. thanks the support by Grant-in-Aids from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technologies of Japan (18H05222). L.L. acknowledges DGAPA PAPIIT grants IN112820 and IN108324, and CONAHCYT-CF grant 263356. G.S., C.C. and L.P. acknowledge the project PRIN-MUR 2020 MUR BEYOND-2p Astrochemistry beyond the second period elements, Prot. 2020AFB3FX. G.S. also acknowledges support from the INAF-Minigrant 2023 TRIESTE TRacing the chemIcal hEritage of our originS: from proTostars to planEts. T.S. thanks the support by Grant-in-Aids from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technologies of Japan (20K04025, 20H05845, and 18H05222).

References

  • Alves et al. (2019) Alves, F. O., Caselli, P., Girart, J. M., et al. 2019, Science, 366, 90
  • Arce et al. (2008) Arce, H. G., Santiago-García, J., Jørgensen, J. K., Tafalla, M., & Bachiller, R. 2008, ApJ, 681, L21
  • Balucani et al. (2015) Balucani, N., Ceccarelli, C., & Taquet, V. 2015, MNRAS, 449, L16
  • Belloche et al. (2020) Belloche, A., Maury, A. J., Maret, S., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A198
  • Bianchi et al. (2019) Bianchi, E., Codella, C., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 1850
  • Bianchi et al. (2022) Bianchi, E., López-Sepulcre, A., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 928, L3
  • Bianchi et al. (2023) Bianchi, E., López-Sepulcre, A., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2023, Faraday Discussions, 245, 164
  • Bottinelli et al. (2004) Bottinelli, S., Ceccarelli, C., Lefloch, B., et al. 2004, ApJ, 615, 354
  • Brooke et al. (2007) Brooke, T. Y., Huard, T. L., Bourke, T. L., et al. 2007, ApJ, 655, 364
  • Brouillet et al. (2013) Brouillet, N., Despois, D., Baudry, A., et al. 2013, A&A, 550, A46
  • Brown et al. (1990) Brown, R. D., Godfrey, P. D., McNaughton, D., Pierlot, A. P., & Taylor, W. H. 1990, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 140, 340
  • Carvajal et al. (2010) Carvajal, M., Kleiner, I., & Demaison, J. 2010, ApJS, 190, 315
  • Carvajal et al. (2009) Carvajal, M., Margulès, L., Tercero, B., et al. 2009, A&A, 500, 1109
  • Cazaux et al. (2003) Cazaux, S., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2003, ApJ, 593, L51
  • Ceccarelli (2004) Ceccarelli, C. 2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 323, Star Formation in the Interstellar Medium: In Honor of David Hollenbach, ed. D. Johnstone, F. C. Adams, D. N. C. Lin, D. A. Neufeeld, & E. C. Ostriker, 195
  • Ceccarelli et al. (2017) Ceccarelli, C., Caselli, P., Fontani, F., et al. 2017, ApJ, 850, 176
  • Ceccarelli et al. (2023) Ceccarelli, C., Codella, C., Balucani, N., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 379
  • Chahine et al. (2022) Chahine, L., López-Sepulcre, A., Neri, R., et al. 2022, A&A, 657, A78
  • Charnley (1997) Charnley, S. B. 1997, in IAU Colloq. 161: Astronomical and Biochemical Origins and the Search for Life in the Universe, ed. C. Batalli Cosmovici, S. Bowyer, & D. Werthimer, 89
  • Charnley & Rodgers (2008) Charnley, S. B. & Rodgers, S. D. 2008, Space Sci. Rev., 138, 59
  • Codella et al. (2021) Codella, C., Ceccarelli, C., Chandler, C., et al. 2021, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 8, 227
  • Codella et al. (2015) Codella, C., Fontani, F., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, L11
  • Coletta et al. (2020) Coletta, A., Fontani, F., Rivilla, V. M., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A54
  • Condon (1997) Condon, J. J. 1997, PASP, 109, 166
  • Condon et al. (1998) Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693
  • Csengeri et al. (2019) Csengeri, T., Belloche, A., Bontemps, S., et al. 2019, A&A, 632, A57
  • De Simone et al. (2020a) De Simone, M., Ceccarelli, C., Codella, C., et al. 2020a, ApJ, 896, L3
  • De Simone et al. (2020b) De Simone, M., Codella, C., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2020b, A&A, 640, A75
  • Draine (1995) Draine, B. T. 1995, Ap&SS, 233, 111
  • Dzib et al. (2018) Dzib, S. A., Loinard, L., Ortiz-León, G. N., Rodríguez, L. F., & Galli, P. A. B. 2018, ApJ, 867, 151
  • Endres et al. (2009) Endres, C. P., Drouin, B. J., Pearson, J. C., et al. 2009, A&A, 504, 635
  • Enrique-Romero et al. (2022) Enrique-Romero, J., Rimola, A., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2022, ApJS, 259, 39
  • Evans et al. (2023) Evans, L., Vastel, C., Fontani, F., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A160
  • Ferrero et al. (2023) Ferrero, S., Ceccarelli, C., Ugliengo, P., Sodupe, M., & Rimola, A. 2023, ApJ, 951, 150
  • Fontani et al. (2007) Fontani, F., Pascucci, I., Caselli, P., et al. 2007, A&A, 470, 639
  • Garrod et al. (2022) Garrod, R. T., Jin, M., Matis, K. A., et al. 2022, ApJS, 259, 1
  • Garrod et al. (2008) Garrod, R. T., Widicus Weaver, S. L., & Herbst, E. 2008, ApJ, 682, 283
  • Garufi et al. (2022) Garufi, A., Podio, L., Codella, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A104
  • Herbst & van Dishoeck (2009) Herbst, E. & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 427
  • Hsieh et al. (2023) Hsieh, T. H., Segura-Cox, D. M., Pineda, J. E., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, A137
  • Hudson & Loeffler (2013) Hudson, R. L. & Loeffler, M. J. 2013, ApJ, 773, 109
  • Ilyushin et al. (2009) Ilyushin, V., Kryvda, A., & Alekseev, E. 2009, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 255, 32
  • Jaber et al. (2014) Jaber, A. A., Ceccarelli, C., Kahane, C., & Caux, E. 2014, ApJ, 791, 29
  • Jiménez-Serra et al. (2016) Jiménez-Serra, I., Vasyunin, A. I., Caselli, P., et al. 2016, ApJ, 830, L6
  • Jørgensen et al. (2018) Jørgensen, J. K., Müller, H. S. P., Calcutt, H., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A170
  • Jørgensen et al. (2016) Jørgensen, J. K., van der Wiel, M. H. D., Coutens, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A117
  • Ju et al. (2016) Ju, W., Stone, J. M., & Zhu, Z. 2016, ApJ, 823, 81
  • Kleiner et al. (1996) Kleiner, I., Lovas, F. J., & Godefroid, M. 1996, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 25, 1113
  • Kryvda et al. (2009) Kryvda, A. V., Gerasimov, V. G., Dyubko, S. F., Alekseev, E. A., & Motiyenko, R. A. 2009, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 254, 28
  • Lee et al. (2022) Lee, C.-F., Codella, C., Ceccarelli, C., & López-Sepulcre, A. 2022, ApJ, 937, 10
  • Lefloch et al. (2017) Lefloch, B., Ceccarelli, C., Codella, C., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, L73
  • Lindberg & Jørgensen (2012) Lindberg, J. E. & Jørgensen, J. K. 2012, A&A, 548, A24
  • Lindberg et al. (2015) Lindberg, J. E., Jørgensen, J. K., Watanabe, Y., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A28
  • López-Sepulcre et al. (2017) López-Sepulcre, A., Sakai, N., Neri, R., et al. 2017, A&A, 606, A121
  • Manigand et al. (2020) Manigand, S., Jørgensen, J. K., Calcutt, H., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A48
  • Maureira et al. (2022) Maureira, M. J., Gong, M., Pineda, J. E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 941, L23
  • Maureira et al. (2020) Maureira, M. J., Pineda, J. E., Segura-Cox, D. M., et al. 2020, ApJ, 897, 59
  • Milam et al. (2005) Milam, S. N., Savage, C., Brewster, M. A., Ziurys, L. M., & Wyckoff, S. 2005, ApJ, 634, 1126
  • Morris et al. (1980) Morris, M., Palmer, P., & Zuckerman, B. 1980, ApJ, 237, 1
  • Mösta et al. (2019) Mösta, P., Taam, R. E., & Duffell, P. C. 2019, ApJ, 875, L21
  • Müller et al. (2005) Müller, H. S. P., Schlöder, F., Stutzki, J., & Winnewisser, G. 2005, Journal of Molecular Structure, 742, 215
  • Onishi et al. (1999) Onishi, T., Kawamura, A., Abe, R., et al. 1999, PASJ, 51, 871
  • Pickett et al. (1998) Pickett, H. M., Poynter, R. L., Cohen, E. A., et al. 1998, J. Quant. Spec. Radiat. Transf., 60, 883
  • Rivilla et al. (2017) Rivilla, V. M., Beltrán, M. T., Cesaroni, R., et al. 2017, A&A, 598, A59
  • Shi et al. (2012) Shi, J.-M., Krolik, J. H., Lubow, S. H., & Hawley, J. F. 2012, ApJ, 749, 118
  • Spruit (1987) Spruit, H. C. 1987, A&A, 184, 173
  • van Gelder et al. (2020) van Gelder, M. L., Tabone, B., Tychoniec, Ł., et al. 2020, A&A, 639, A87
  • Vastel et al. (2022) Vastel, C., Alves, F., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 664, A171
  • Vastel et al. (2014) Vastel, C., Ceccarelli, C., Lefloch, B., & Bachiller, R. 2014, ApJ, 795, L2
  • Winnewisser et al. (2002) Winnewisser, M., Winnewisser, B. P., Stein, M., et al. 2002, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 216, 259
  • Yang et al. (2021) Yang, Y.-L., Sakai, N., Zhang, Y., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 20
  • Zhou et al. (2022) Zhou, C., Vastel, C., Montillaud, J., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A131

Appendix A Details for the observed transitions

Table 4: continued.
Frequency Quantum numbers Eupsubscript𝐸𝑢𝑝E_{up}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Aulsubscript𝐴𝑢𝑙A_{ul}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT gupsubscript𝑔𝑢𝑝g_{up}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Original beam, PA𝑃𝐴PAitalic_P italic_A rms𝑟𝑚𝑠rmsitalic_r italic_m italic_s δV𝛿𝑉\delta Vitalic_δ italic_V
(MHz) (J,Ka,Kc,vt𝐽subscript𝐾𝑎subscript𝐾𝑐subscript𝑣𝑡J,K_{a},K_{c},v_{t}italic_J , italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) (K) (s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) (×′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}\times^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT × start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT,{}^{\circ}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) (K) (km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT)
CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTa𝑎aitalic_aa𝑎aitalic_aa𝑎aitalic_aThe spectroscopic parameters for CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT come from CDMS (TAG=46514) (Endres et al. 2009). The AA, EE, EA, and AE substates are represented by the vtsubscript𝑣𝑡v_{t}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT designations of 0, 1, 3, and 5, respectively.
257915.5190 185,13,05130{}_{5,13,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 , 13 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 184,14,04140{}_{4,14,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 , 14 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 190.97 8.76 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 222 0.44 ×\times× 0.38, -83 0.1494 0.14
257913.3120 185,13,15131{}_{5,13,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 , 13 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 184,14,14141{}_{4,14,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 , 14 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 190.97 8.76 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 592 0.44 ×\times× 0.38, -83 0.1494 0.14
257911.1750 185,13,35133{}_{5,13,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 , 13 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 184,14,34143{}_{4,14,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 , 14 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 190.97 8.76 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 148 0.44 ×\times× 0.38, -83 0.1494 0.14
257911.0360 185,13,55135{}_{5,13,5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 , 13 , 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 184,14,54145{}_{4,14,5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 , 14 , 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 190.97 8.77 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 74 0.44 ×\times× 0.38, -83 0.1494 0.14
258549.3080 141,14,01140{}_{1,14,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 14 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 130,13,00130{}_{0,13,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0 , 13 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 93.33 1.31 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 290 0.44 ×\times× 0.38, -82 0.1469 0.14
258549.0630 141,14,11141{}_{1,14,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 14 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 130,13,10131{}_{0,13,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0 , 13 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 93.33 1.31 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 464 0.44 ×\times× 0.38, -82 0.1469 0.14
258548.8190 141,14,31143{}_{1,14,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 14 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 130,13,30133{}_{0,13,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0 , 13 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 93.33 1.31 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 116 0.44 ×\times× 0.38, -82 0.1469 0.14
258548.8190 141,14,51145{}_{1,14,5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 14 , 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 130,13,50135{}_{0,13,5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0 , 13 , 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 93.33 1.31 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 174 0.44 ×\times× 0.38, -82 0.1469 0.14
CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHOb𝑏bitalic_bb𝑏bitalic_bb𝑏bitalic_bThe spectroscopic parameters for CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTOCHO come from JPL (TAG=60003)] (Ilyushin et al. 2009) with Aulul{}_{\mathrm{ul}}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT roman_ul end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT larger than 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT.
233212.773 194,16,14161{}_{4,16,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 , 16 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 184,15,14151{}_{4,15,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 , 15 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 123.26 1.82 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
233226.788 194,16,04160{}_{4,16,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 , 16 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 184,15,04150{}_{4,15,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 , 15 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 123.25 1.82 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
233649.88 1912,7,21272{}_{12,7,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 12 , 7 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1812,6,21262{}_{12,6,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 12 , 6 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 207.62 1.16 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
233655.342 1912,8,01280{}_{12,8,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 12 , 8 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1812,7,01270{}_{12,7,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 12 , 7 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 207.62 1.16 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
233655.342 1912,7,01270{}_{12,7,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 12 , 7 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1812,6,01260{}_{12,6,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 12 , 6 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 207.62 1.16 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
233670.980 1912,8,11281{}_{12,8,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 12 , 8 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1812,7,11271{}_{12,7,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 12 , 7 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 207.60 1.16 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
233753.960 184,14,24142{}_{4,14,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 , 14 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 174,13,24132{}_{4,13,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 , 13 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 114.37 1.84 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 74 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
233777.521 184,14,04140{}_{4,14,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 , 14 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 174,13,04130{}_{4,13,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 , 13 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 114.36 1.84 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 74 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
233845.233 1911,8,21182{}_{11,8,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 11 , 8 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1811,7,21172{}_{11,7,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 11 , 7 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 192.39 1.29 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
233854.286 1911,9,01190{}_{11,9,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 11 , 9 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1811,8,01180{}_{11,8,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 11 , 8 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 192.39 1.29 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
233854.286 1911,8,01180{}_{11,8,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 11 , 8 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1811,7,01170{}_{11,7,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 11 , 7 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 192.39 1.29 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
233867.193 1911,9,11191{}_{11,9,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 11 , 9 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1811,8,11181{}_{11,8,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 11 , 8 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 192.38 1.29 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234112.330 1910,9,21092{}_{10,9,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 10 , 9 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1810,8,21082{}_{10,8,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 10 , 8 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 178.51 1.40 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234124.883 1910,9,01090{}_{10,9,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 10 , 9 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1810,8,01080{}_{10,8,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 10 , 8 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 178.50 1.40 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234124.883 1910,10,010100{}_{10,10,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 10 , 10 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1810,9,01090{}_{10,9,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 10 , 9 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 178.50 1.40 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234134.600 1910,10,110101{}_{10,10,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 10 , 10 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1810,9,11091{}_{10,9,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 10 , 9 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 178.50 1.40 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234486.395 199,10,29102{}_{9,10,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 9 , 10 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 189,9,2992{}_{9,9,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 9 , 9 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 165.98 1.51 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234502.2407 199,11,09110{}_{9,11,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 9 , 11 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 189,10,09100{}_{9,10,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 9 , 10 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 165.97 1.51 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234502.4315 199,10,09100{}_{9,10,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 9 , 10 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 189,9,0990{}_{9,9,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 9 , 9 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 165.97 1.51 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234508.614 199,11,19111{}_{9,11,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 9 , 11 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 189,10,19101{}_{9,10,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 9 , 10 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 165.97 1.51 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
245883.179 2013,7,21372{}_{13,7,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 13 , 7 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1913,6,21362{}_{13,6,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 13 , 6 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 235.98 1.30 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 82 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
245885.243 2013,7,01370{}_{13,7,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 13 , 7 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1913,6,01360{}_{13,6,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 13 , 6 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 235.98 1.30 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 82 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
245885.243 2013,8,01380{}_{13,8,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 13 , 8 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1913,7,01370{}_{13,7,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 13 , 7 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 235.98 1.30 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 82 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
245903.680 2013,8,11381{}_{13,8,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 13 , 8 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1913,7,11371{}_{13,7,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 13 , 7 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 235.97 1.30 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 82 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
246187.016 212,19,32193{}_{2,19,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 19 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 202,18,32183{}_{2,18,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 18 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 326.63 2.18 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 86 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
246600.012 2010,10,210102{}_{10,10,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 10 , 10 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1910,9,21092{}_{10,9,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 10 , 9 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 190.35 1.70 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 82 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
246613.392 2010,10,010100{}_{10,10,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 10 , 10 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1910,9,01090{}_{10,9,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 10 , 9 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 190.34 1.70 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 82 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
246613.392 2010,11,010110{}_{10,11,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 10 , 11 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1910,10,010100{}_{10,10,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 10 , 10 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 190.34 1.70 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 82 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
246615.129 205,16,35163{}_{5,16,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 , 16 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 195,15,35153{}_{5,15,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 , 15 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 328.24 2.12 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 82 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
246623.190 2010,11,110111{}_{10,11,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 10 , 11 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 1910,10,110101{}_{10,10,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 10 , 10 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 190.33 1.70 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 82 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
246891.611 194,15,24152{}_{4,15,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 , 15 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 184,14,24142{}_{4,14,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 , 14 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 126.22 2.18 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
246914.658 194,15,04150{}_{4,15,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 , 15 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 184,14,04140{}_{4,14,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 , 14 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 126.21 2.18 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
247040.65 209,11,29112{}_{9,11,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 9 , 11 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 199,10,29102{}_{9,10,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 9 , 10 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 177.84 1.82 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 82 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
247044.146 213,19,13191{}_{3,19,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 19 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 203,18,13181{}_{3,18,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 18 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 139.90 2.21 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 86 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
247053.453 213,19,03190{}_{3,19,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 19 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 203,18,03180{}_{3,18,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 18 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 139.89 2.21 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 86 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
247057.2591 209,12,09120{}_{9,12,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 9 , 12 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 199,11,09110{}_{9,11,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 9 , 11 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 177.83 1.82 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 82 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
247057.7373 209,11,09110{}_{9,11,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 9 , 11 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 199,10,09100{}_{9,10,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 9 , 10 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 177.83 1.82 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 82 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
247063.662 209,12,19121{}_{9,12,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 9 , 12 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 199,11,19111{}_{9,11,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 9 , 11 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 177.82 1.82 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 82 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
247469.2492 231,23,31233{}_{1,23,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 23 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 221,22,31223{}_{1,22,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 22 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 332.88 2.28 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 94 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
247469.5853 230,23,30233{}_{0,23,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0 , 23 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 220,22,30223{}_{0,22,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0 , 22 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 332.88 2.28 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 94 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
247516.3123 230,23,50235{}_{0,23,5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0 , 23 , 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 220,22,50225{}_{0,22,5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0 , 22 , 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 332.13 2.29 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 94 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
247516.0121 231,23,41234{}_{1,23,4}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 23 , 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 221,22,41224{}_{1,22,4}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 22 , 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 332.13 2.29 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 94 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
257919.89 2116,5,21652{}_{16,5,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 16 , 5 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 2016,4,21642{}_{16,4,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 16 , 4 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 306.01 1.09 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 86 0.44 ×\times× 0.38, -83 0.1494 0.14
257910.566 2116,5,01650{}_{16,5,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 16 , 5 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 2016,4,01640{}_{16,4,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 16 , 4 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 306.01 1.09 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 86 0.44 ×\times× 0.38, -83 0.1494 0.14
257910.566 2116,6,01660{}_{16,6,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 16 , 6 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 2016,5,01650{}_{16,5,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 16 , 5 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 306.01 1.09 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 86 0.44 ×\times× 0.38, -83 0.1494 0.14
257906.128 218,13,38133{}_{8,13,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 8 , 13 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 208,12,38123{}_{8,12,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 8 , 12 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 365.98 2.22 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 86 0.44 ×\times× 0.38, -83 0.1494 0.14
257889.872 218,14,38143{}_{8,14,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 8 , 14 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 208,13,38133{}_{8,13,3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 8 , 13 , 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 365.98 2.22 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 86 0.44 ×\times× 0.38, -83 0.1494 0.14
H22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCCOc𝑐citalic_cc𝑐citalic_cc𝑐citalic_cThe spectroscopic parameters for H22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCCO come from CDMS (TAG=42501) (Brown et al. 1990).
260191.982 131,13113{}_{1,13}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 13 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 121,12112{}_{1,12}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 12 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 100.5 1.98 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 81 0.44 ×\times× 0.37, -83 0.1071 0.14
t-HCOOHd𝑑ditalic_dd𝑑ditalic_dd𝑑ditalic_dThe spectroscopic parameters for t-HCOOH come from CDMS (TAG=46506) (Winnewisser et al. 2002).
246105.9739 112,10210{}_{2,10}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 10 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT–102,929{}_{2,9}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 9 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 83.74 1.62 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 23 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
247446.2439 116,666{}_{6,6}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 6 , 6 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT–106,565{}_{6,5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 6 , 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 185.63 1.20 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 23 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
247513.9713 115,757{}_{5,7}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 , 7 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT–105,656{}_{5,6}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 , 6 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 150.71 1.35 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 23 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
247514.1176 115,656{}_{5,6}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 , 6 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT–105,555{}_{5,5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 , 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 150.71 1.35 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 23 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
999



Appendix B Upper limits of N(C2H5CN)NsubscriptC2subscriptH5CN\rm N(C_{2}H_{5}CN)roman_N ( roman_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_CN ) and N(C2H3CN)NsubscriptC2subscriptH3CN\rm N(C_{2}H_{3}CN)roman_N ( roman_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_CN )

We present in this section the computation for the upper limits on the nitrogen bearing iCOMs.
Figure 9 shows the observed spectra of three C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN lines within 0.82′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT×\times×0.77′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT centred at α𝛼\alphaitalic_α(2000) = 17h11m23.107s, δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ(2000) = -27{}^{\circ}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT24{}^{\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT33.005′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The quantum numbers (and spectroscopic parameters from CDMS) associated for the three transitions are listed in Table 6. Of the three transitions, the 282,27227{}_{2,27}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 27 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT–262,26226{}_{2,26}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 26 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT line is expected to be strongest. Some features can be seen in Figure 9, but they are all offset from the velocity of the three velocity components (-2, 2.8, and 9.9 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT). We can safely conclude that the C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN emission is not detected within the noise.
Figure 10 shows the observed spectra of three C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN lines whose quantum numbers (and spectroscopic parameters from CDMS) are listed in Table 6. Of the three transitions, the C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN 263,24324{}_{3,24}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 24 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT–253,23323{}_{3,23}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 23 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT line is expected to be strongest. In Figure 10, we can safely conclude that no C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN emission is detected within the noise. From the observed transitions of C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN 282,27227{}_{2,27}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 27 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT–262,26226{}_{2,26}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 26 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT and C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN 263,24324{}_{3,24}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 24 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT–253,23323{}_{3,23}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 23 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT, we can evaluate an upper limit on their column densities. For the derivation, we assumed an LTE condition and used the following equation:

Ntotal=3h8π3μ2SfQexp(EukTex)exp(hνkTex)1WuJ(Tex)J(TBB),subscript𝑁𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙38superscript𝜋3superscript𝜇2𝑆𝑓𝑄subscript𝐸𝑢𝑘subscript𝑇ex𝜈𝑘subscript𝑇ex1subscript𝑊𝑢𝐽subscript𝑇ex𝐽subscript𝑇BBN_{total}=\frac{3h}{8\pi^{3}\mu^{2}Sf}Q\frac{\exp\left(\frac{E_{u}}{kT_{\rm ex% }}\right)}{\exp\left(\frac{h\nu}{kT_{\rm ex}}\right)-1}\frac{W_{u}}{J(T_{\rm ex% })-J(T_{\rm BB})},italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t italic_o italic_t italic_a italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 3 italic_h end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_S italic_f end_ARG italic_Q divide start_ARG roman_exp ( divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_k italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ex end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) end_ARG start_ARG roman_exp ( divide start_ARG italic_h italic_ν end_ARG start_ARG italic_k italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ex end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) - 1 end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_W start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_J ( italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ex end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) - italic_J ( italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_BB end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG , (1)

where hhitalic_h is the Planck constant, Q𝑄Qitalic_Q is the partition function, ν𝜈\nuitalic_ν is the rest frequency, μ𝜇\muitalic_μ is the electric dipole moment, S𝑆Sitalic_S is the line strength, f𝑓fitalic_f is the beam filling factor, Eupsubscript𝐸𝑢𝑝E_{up}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the upper state energy, Texsubscript𝑇exT_{\rm ex}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ex end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the excitation temperature, TBBsubscript𝑇BBT_{\rm BB}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_BB end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the temperature of the cosmic background radiation (2.73 K), Wusubscript𝑊𝑢W_{u}italic_W start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the upper limit of integrated intensity, k𝑘kitalic_k is the Boltzmann constant, and J𝐽Jitalic_J is the Planck function for the given temperature and frequency (ν𝜈\nuitalic_ν) as

J(T)=hνkexp(hνkT)1.𝐽𝑇𝜈𝑘𝜈𝑘𝑇1J(T)=\frac{\frac{h\nu}{k}}{\exp\left(\frac{h\nu}{kT}\right)-1}.italic_J ( italic_T ) = divide start_ARG divide start_ARG italic_h italic_ν end_ARG start_ARG italic_k end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG roman_exp ( divide start_ARG italic_h italic_ν end_ARG start_ARG italic_k italic_T end_ARG ) - 1 end_ARG . (2)

The upper limit of the integrated intensity (in K km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) was calculated from the following equation:

Wu=σδVΔVδV,subscript𝑊𝑢𝜎𝛿𝑉Δ𝑉𝛿𝑉W_{u}=\sigma\delta V\sqrt{\frac{\Delta V}{\delta V}},italic_W start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_σ italic_δ italic_V square-root start_ARG divide start_ARG roman_Δ italic_V end_ARG start_ARG italic_δ italic_V end_ARG end_ARG , (3)

where σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ is the rms𝑟𝑚𝑠rmsitalic_r italic_m italic_s noise level of the spectra at the channel width of δV𝛿𝑉\delta Vitalic_δ italic_V (Table 4), and ΔVΔ𝑉\Delta Vroman_Δ italic_V is the velocity width of a target. For the calculations, we adopted the parameters from Table 5. The partition function Q𝑄Qitalic_Q was evaluated using the values reported in the CDMS database. We fit the CDMS data to the function of Q𝑄Qitalic_Q(T𝑇Titalic_T) = a𝑎aitalic_a×\times×Tbsuperscript𝑇𝑏T^{b}italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where a𝑎aitalic_a and b𝑏bitalic_b are fitting parameters. For C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN, (a𝑎aitalic_a, b𝑏bitalic_b)=(7.2158, 1.4995). For C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN, (a𝑎aitalic_a, b𝑏bitalic_b)=(0.95923, 2.0865). The derived upper limits are presented in Table 5.

Refer to caption
Figure 9: C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN transitions. The vertical dotted lines indicate the velocity of the three velocity components (-2, 2.8, and 9.9 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT). The red lines indicate the 3 σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ noise level.
Refer to caption
Figure 10: C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN transitions. The vertical dotted lines indicate the velocity of the three velocity components (-2, 2.8, and 9.9 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT). The red lines indicate the 3 σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ noise level.
Table 5: Upper limits for N𝑁Nitalic_N(C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN) and N𝑁Nitalic_N(C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN).
Velocity components
-2 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2.8 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 9.9 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT
N𝑁Nitalic_N(C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN) (cm22{}^{-2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) <<<3.5×\times×101414{}^{14}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 14 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT <<<1.9×\times×101515{}^{15}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT <<<2.0×\times×101515{}^{15}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT
N𝑁Nitalic_N(C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN) (cm22{}^{-2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) <<<2.4×\times×101414{}^{14}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 14 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT <<<5.2×\times×101414{}^{14}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 14 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT <<<5.4×\times×101414{}^{14}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 14 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT
θSsubscript𝜃𝑆\theta_{S}italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) 0.15 0.13 0.12
ΔVΔ𝑉\Delta Vroman_Δ italic_V (km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) 2 5 4
Temperature (K) 80 80 80
101010The identification of the three velocity components is based on the methanol analysis described in Vastel et al. (2022).

Appendix C Spectroscopic parameters for the non-detected transitions

Table 6: Spectroscopic parameters for some non-detected transitions we used to compute upper limits.
Frequency Quantum numbers Eupsubscript𝐸𝑢𝑝E_{up}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Aulsubscript𝐴𝑢𝑙A_{ul}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT gupsubscript𝑔𝑢𝑝g_{up}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Original beam, PA𝑃𝐴PAitalic_P italic_A rms𝑟𝑚𝑠rmsitalic_r italic_m italic_sa𝑎aitalic_aa𝑎aitalic_aa𝑎aitalic_aThe rms𝑟𝑚𝑠rmsitalic_r italic_m italic_s is computed from the spectra extracted within 0.82′′×0.77′′superscript0.82′′superscript0.77′′0.82^{\prime\prime}\times 0.77^{\prime\prime}0.82 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × 0.77 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. δV𝛿𝑉\delta Vitalic_δ italic_V
(MHz) (J,Ka,Kc,vt𝐽subscript𝐾𝑎subscript𝐾𝑐subscript𝑣𝑡J,K_{a},K_{c},v_{t}italic_J , italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) (K) (s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) (×′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}\times^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT × start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT,{}^{\circ}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) (K) (km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT)
CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCHOb𝑏bitalic_bb𝑏bitalic_bb𝑏bitalic_bThe spectroscopic parameters for CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCHO (Kleiner et al. 1996) comes from JPL (TAG=44003) with Aulul{}_{\mathrm{ul}}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT roman_ul end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT larger than 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT.
232980.5688 52,3,2232{}_{2,3,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 3 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 41,3,2132{}_{1,3,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 3 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 23.03 1.34 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 22 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234469.2610 33,1,1311{}_{3,1,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 1 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 32,2,1221{}_{2,2,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 2 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 25.84 2.08 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 14 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234241.5647 33,0,2302{}_{3,0,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 0 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 32,1,2212{}_{2,1,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 1 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 25.94 2.08 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 14 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
247432.9970 62,5,1251{}_{2,5,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 5 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 51,4,2142{}_{1,4,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 4 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 28.46 2.48 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 26 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
234437.9503 43,2,1321{}_{3,2,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 2 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 42,3,1231{}_{2,3,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 3 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 29.53 2.92 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 18 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234198.3312 43,1,2312{}_{3,1,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 1 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 42,2,2222{}_{2,2,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 2 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 29.64 2.91 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 18 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234396.7456 53,3,1331{}_{3,3,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 3 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 52,4,1241{}_{2,4,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 4 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 34.16 3.30 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 22 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234091.1815 53,2,2322{}_{3,2,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 2 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 52,3,2232{}_{2,3,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 3 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 34.26 3.29 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 22 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234385.7553 63,4,1341{}_{3,4,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 4 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 62,5,1251{}_{2,5,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 5 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 39.71 3.40 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 26 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
233845.3823 63,3,2332{}_{3,3,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 3 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 62,4,2242{}_{2,4,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 4 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 39.81 3.38 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 26 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234486.2127 73,5,1351{}_{3,5,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 5 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 72,6,1261{}_{2,6,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 6 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 46.19 3.26 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 30 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234144.5136 73,4,0340{}_{3,4,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 4 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 72,5,0250{}_{2,5,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 5 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 46.29 3.80 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 30 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
233341.7003 73,4,2342{}_{3,4,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 4 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 72,5,2252{}_{2,5,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 5 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 46.29 3.22 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 30 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
233124.9632 83,5,0350{}_{3,5,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 5 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 82,6,0260{}_{2,6,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 6 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 53.69 3.88 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 34 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
247142.155 140,14,00140{}_{0,14,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0 , 14 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 131,13,01130{}_{1,13,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 13 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 95.68 6.64 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 58 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
247341.3322 140,14,20142{}_{0,14,2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0 , 14 , 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 131,13,11131{}_{1,13,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 13 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 95.76 6.63 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 58 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
246330.7304 153,13,03130{}_{3,13,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 13 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 152,14,02140{}_{2,14,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 14 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 131.49 4.89 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 62 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
234401.4565 182,17,12171{}_{2,17,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 17 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 181,18,11181{}_{1,18,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 18 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 166.47 2.71 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 74 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
245939.644 192,18,02180{}_{2,18,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 18 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 191,19,01190{}_{1,19,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 19 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 183.86 3.04 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 78 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
233048.5159 122,11,42114{}_{2,11,4}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 11 , 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 112,10,42104{}_{2,10,4}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 10 , 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 285.13 4.15 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 50 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
NH22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCHOc𝑐citalic_cc𝑐citalic_cc𝑐citalic_cThe spectroscopic parameters for NH22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCHO (Kryvda et al. 2009) comes from CDMS (TAG=45512) with Aulul{}_{\mathrm{ul}}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT roman_ul end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT larger than 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT.
247390.719 120,12012{}_{0,12}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0 , 12 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 110,11011{}_{0,11}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0 , 11 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 78.12 1.10 1033{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 25 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
260189.0898 122,10210{}_{2,10}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 10 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 112,929{}_{2,9}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 9 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 92.35 1.25 1033{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 25 0.44 ×\times× 0.37, -83 0.1071 0.14
233896.577 113,939{}_{3,9}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 9 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 103,838{}_{3,8}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 8 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 94.11 8.62 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 23 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
234315.498 113,838{}_{3,8}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 8 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 103,737{}_{3,7}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 7 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 94.16 8.67 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 23 0.38 ×\times× 0.34, 70 0.115 0.63
CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTO1313{}^{13}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 13 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTCHOd𝑑ditalic_dd𝑑ditalic_dd𝑑ditalic_dThe spectroscopic parameters for CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTO1313{}^{13}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 13 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTCHO (Carvajal et al. 2010) comes from CDMS (TAG=61515) with Aulul{}_{\mathrm{ul}}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT roman_ul end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT larger than 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT.
246787.916 231,23,11231{}_{1,23,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 23 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 221,22,11221{}_{1,22,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 22 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 144.64 2.31 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 94 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
246788.142 230,23,10231{}_{0,23,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0 , 23 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 220,22,10221{}_{0,22,1}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0 , 22 , 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 144.64 2.31 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 94 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
246788.838 231,23,01230{}_{1,23,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 23 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 221,22,01220{}_{1,22,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 , 22 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 144.62 2.31 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 94 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
246789.063 230,23,00230{}_{0,23,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0 , 23 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT – 220,22,00220{}_{0,22,0}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0 , 22 , 0 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 144.62 2.31 1044{}^{-4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 94 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN
246268.7369 272,25225{}_{2,25}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 25 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT–262,24224{}_{2,24}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 24 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 169.80 1.26 1033{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 55 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
246421.9174 282,27227{}_{2,27}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 27 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT–262,26226{}_{2,26}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 , 26 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 177.26 1.26 1033{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 57 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
246548.6987 273,24324{}_{3,24}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 24 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT-263,23323{}_{3,23}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 23 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 174.065 1.25 1033{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 55 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
C22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCN
247087.0333 263,24324{}_{3,24}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 24 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT–253,23323{}_{3,23}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 , 23 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 179.49 3.33 1033{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 159 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
247171.5135 256,20620{}_{6,20}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 6 , 20 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT–265,21521{}_{5,21}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 , 21 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 225.85 3.17 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 153 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
247181.6118 256,19619{}_{6,19}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 6 , 19 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT–265,22522{}_{5,22}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 , 22 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 225.85 3.17 1055{}^{-5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 153 0.46 ×\times× 0.39, -80 0.0373 1.19
111111



Refer to caption
Figure 11: Potential CH33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTO1313{}^{13}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 13 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTCHO transitions at 246.78 GHz whose spectroscopic parameters are listed in Table 4. The dashed lines correspond to the results of the best-fit Gaussian components obtained from the high spectral resolution methanol transitions at -2 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, 2.8 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT and 9.9 km s11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT (Vastel et al. 2022). The red line corresponds to the modelled transitions as described in Sect. 5. The shaded area corresponds to the filled histogram above and below the baseline.