Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
\cftsetindents

section0em2.5em \cftsetindentssubsection2.5em2.5em

Millicharged Condensates on Earth

Asher Berlina,b aberlin@fnal.gov    Roni Harnika,b roni@fnal.gov    Ying-Ying Lic,d yingyingli@ustc.edu.cn    Bin Xue binxu@pku.edu.cn aTheory Division, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory bSuperconducting Quantum Materials and Systems Center (SQMS), Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory cPeng Huanwu Center for Fundamental Theory, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China dInterdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China eSchool of Physics and State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Abstract

We demonstrate that long-ranged terrestrial electric fields can be used to exclude or discover ultralight bosonic particles with extremely small charge, beyond that probed by astrophysics. Bound condensates of scalar millicharged particles can be rapidly produced near electrostatic generators or in the atmosphere. If such particles directly couple to the photon, they quickly short out such electrical activity. Instead, for interactions mediated by a kinetically-mixed dark photon, the effects of this condensate are suppressed depending on the size of the kinetic mixing, but may still be directly detected with precision electromagnetic sensors. Analogous condensates can also develop in other theories involving new long-ranged forces, such as those coupled to baryon and lepton number.

preprint: FERMILAB-PUB-24-0002-SQMS-T, USTC-ICTS/PCFT-24-08preprint: FERMILAB-PUB-24-0002-SQMS-Tpreprint: USTC-ICTS/PCFT-24-08

I Introduction

It has long been understood Heisenberg and Euler (1936); Sauter (1932); Schwinger (1951) that strong electromagnetic fields drastically modify the structure of the vacuum. This gives rise to various nonlinear corrections to Maxwell’s theory, which among their predictions include the spontaneous production of electron pairs in the presence of an electric field above the critical value Ecrme2/e1012MV/msimilar-tosubscript𝐸crsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑒2𝑒similar-tosuperscript1012MVmE_{\text{cr}}\sim m_{e}^{2}/e\sim 10^{12}\ \text{MV}/\text{m}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT cr end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_e ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 12 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT MV / m, the so-called Schwinger effect Schwinger (1951). Despite its strong theoretical footing, this process has never been observed, due to the difficulty in experimentally realizing such large fields.

In this work, we show that 𝒪(1)𝒪1\mathcal{O}{(1)}caligraphic_O ( 1 ) modifications to electromagnetic observables can occur at much lower field strengths if there exist bosonic millicharged particles (mCPs) χ±superscript𝜒plus-or-minus\chi^{\pm}italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with mass mχsubscript𝑚𝜒m_{\chi}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and electric charge qχ1much-less-thansubscript𝑞𝜒1q_{\chi}\ll 1italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ 1 much smaller than that of the electron. In this case, long-ranged electric potentials can be quickly shorted-out by the exponential Bose-enhanced growth of a bound millicharged condensate. As we show below, the growth of such a condensate is possible for qχ(eEL2)1greater-than-or-equivalent-tosubscript𝑞𝜒superscript𝑒𝐸superscript𝐿21q_{\chi}\gtrsim(eEL^{2})^{-1}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≳ ( italic_e italic_E italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and occurs within a time tLlog(1/qχ)similar-to𝑡𝐿1subscript𝑞𝜒t\sim L\,\log{(1/q_{\chi})}italic_t ∼ italic_L roman_log ( 1 / italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), where E𝐸Eitalic_E is the strength of the electric field and L𝐿Litalic_L is its coherence length. While discharging of sources via mCP pair-production was investigated previously in Refs. Li and Voloshin (2014); Hook and Huang (2017); Korwar and Thalapillil (2019), the possibility of an enhanced bosonic population was not considered.

The strongest electric fields, as found in, e.g., superconducting cavities or ferroelectric materials, are either generated on short timescales or across small distances. Thus, although they can lead to mCP pair-production Gies et al. (2006); Berlin and Hook (2020), they are not ideal for seeding the growth of Bose condensates. This is better suited for long-ranged quasistatic electric fields, which arise from, e.g., atmospheric electricity Feynman et al. (1963). Indeed, Earth’s fair-weather electric field E102V/msimilar-tosubscript𝐸direct-sumsuperscript102VmE_{\oplus}\sim 10^{2}\ \text{V}/\text{m}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊕ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT V / m spans a distance of 102kmsimilar-toabsentsuperscript102km\sim 10^{2}\ \text{km}∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT km from the crust to the ionosphere. However, the presence of Earth’s much larger magnetic field B102Esimilar-tosubscript𝐵direct-sumsuperscript102subscript𝐸direct-sumB_{\oplus}\sim 10^{2}\,E_{\oplus}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊕ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊕ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT typically hampers bosonic pair-production (we discuss an exception to this in Sec. IV). Thus, in this work, we focus predominantly on large Van de Graaff generators and on the electrical activity in thunderstorms, since these produce approximately quasistatic and long-ranged fields E1MV/msimilar-to𝐸1MVmE\sim 1\ \text{MV}/\text{m}italic_E ∼ 1 MV / m and E102kV/msimilar-to𝐸superscript102kVmE\sim 10^{2}\ \text{kV}/\text{m}italic_E ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT kV / m much greater than Bsubscript𝐵direct-sumB_{\oplus}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊕ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT across distances of L1msimilar-to𝐿1mL\sim 1\ \text{m}italic_L ∼ 1 m and L1kmsimilar-to𝐿1kmL\sim 1\ \text{km}italic_L ∼ 1 km, respectively Van de Graaff et al. (1933); Herb (1959); Thu (1986). In this case, such electric fields could be quickly discharged by the production of a bound condensate of scalar mCPs, as shown schematically in Fig. 1.

The remainder of this work is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we discuss the production of an mCP Bose condensate. In Sec. III, we investigate its consequences on large Van de Graaff generators, such as the one in use at the Boston Museum of Science, finding that its successful operation excludes the existence of ultralight bosonic mCPs that couple directly to the photon with charge qχ1014greater-than-or-equivalent-tosubscript𝑞𝜒superscript1014q_{\chi}\gtrsim 10^{-14}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≳ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 14 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. In Sec. IV, we discuss how the generation of condensates in Earth’s atmosphere is possible for much smaller couplings, qχ1018greater-than-or-equivalent-tosubscript𝑞𝜒superscript1018q_{\chi}\gtrsim 10^{-18}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≳ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 18 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. In Sec. V, we discuss direct detection of millicharged condensates and show how modifications to our findings can arise due to model-dependent considerations, such as when mCP interactions are mediated by an ultralight kinetically-mixed dark photon. Finally, we conclude in Sec. VI and discuss directions for future work, such as analogous effects in theories incorporating new long-ranged forces coupled to baryon and lepton number.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: A sketch of the setup (top) and the electrostatic potential (bottom). An object is electrostatically charged, generating a strong Coulomb field around it. Light scalar millicharged particles, if they exist as degrees of freedom, will be Schwinger pair-produced in the strong E𝐸Eitalic_E-field. One sign of millicharges is expelled due to Coulomb repulsion, while the other remains electrostatically bound. The bound population will then Bose-enhance further pair-production, leading to a runaway behavior and the formation of a condensate, which ultimately screens the electric field.

II Millicharged Bose Condensates

In this section, we discuss the process of mCP Schwinger production. For more detailed reviews, see, e.g., Refs. Kim and Page (2002, 2006, 2007); Hebenstreit (2011, 2011); Hebenstreit et al. (2011); Ruffini et al. (2010); Kim (2019). In most of this work, we treat the mCPs as genuinely charged under electromagnetism; in Secs. IV and V, we discuss modifications when such interactions instead arise indirectly from a kinetically-mixed dark photon. Here, we also ignore additional processes which may dominate over the Schwinger effect, such as electromagnetic cascades that are triggered by energetic charged particles or photons (see, e.g., Ref. Arvanitaki et al. (2021)). Our approach is thus conservative, as the effect of such additional reactions is to increase the mCP production rate.

When the energy gained by a virtual particle-antiparticle dipole in an electric field exceeds that of its rest mass, the field is said to be supercritical and pair-production is possible. This is often discussed within the context of charged fermions. In the presence of supercritical Coulomb fields, the bound state energy levels are embedded in the Dirac sea continuum of negative-energy states. It is thus energetically favorable for a particle in the continuum to transition to such a bound state, leaving behind an antiparticle hole. At the particle-level, this corresponds to pair-production, in which particles of one charge escape away to infinity, while the species of opposite charge remain localized near the interaction region, screening the source of the potential. Such pair-production marks the transition to the new charged ground state of the theory, which is stabilized by the Pauli principle.

A similar story also applies to the production of charged scalars, which will be the focus of this work. However, in this case the neutral vacuum evolves towards a highly-occupied Bose condensate that is stabilized by Coulomb interactions and is of sufficient charge to screen the total electric field to be subcritical Klein and Rafelski (1978); Greiner et al. (2012); Rafelski et al. (1978). The initially supercritical neutral vacuum is therefore unstable against decay to the new subcritical charged vacuum. In this section, we show that if there exist ultralight millicharged bosons, the transition to this subcritical state typically occurs within a tiny fraction of a second, corresponding to the generation of a millicharged condensate that can short-out the largest terrestrial electric fields, thus leading to observable consequences.

II.1 Requirements for Production

The requirements for Schwinger pair-production can be derived heuristically from basic kinematic arguments. The vacuum is populated by virtual mCP pairs separated by distances of (mχ2+pχ2)1/2similar-toabsentsuperscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝜒2superscriptsubscript𝑝𝜒212\sim(m_{\chi}^{2}+p_{\chi}^{2})^{-1/2}∼ ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where pχsubscript𝑝𝜒p_{\chi}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the mCP momentum. Pair-production is exponentially suppressed unless a background electric field that is coherent over a distance L𝐿Litalic_L can accelerate this virtual pair to be on-shell, i.e., eqχEd(mχ2+pχ2)1/2greater-than-or-equivalent-to𝑒subscript𝑞𝜒𝐸𝑑superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝜒2superscriptsubscript𝑝𝜒212eq_{\chi}E\,d\gtrsim(m_{\chi}^{2}+p_{\chi}^{2})^{1/2}italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E italic_d ≳ ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where we have defined the distance accessible to this virtual pair as

dmin[L,(mχ2+pχ2)1/2].similar-to𝑑𝐿superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝜒2superscriptsubscript𝑝𝜒212d\sim\min\big{[}L\,,\,(m_{\chi}^{2}+p_{\chi}^{2})^{-1/2}\big{]}\leavevmode% \nobreak\ .italic_d ∼ roman_min [ italic_L , ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] . (1)

Thus, the weakest requirement on the electric field occurs for pχmχmuch-less-thansubscript𝑝𝜒subscript𝑚𝜒p_{\chi}\ll m_{\chi}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. From this we infer that the critical field for mCP Schwinger production is

Ecrmχeqχmax(mχ,L1),similar-tosubscript𝐸crsubscript𝑚𝜒𝑒subscript𝑞𝜒subscript𝑚𝜒superscript𝐿1E_{\text{cr}}\sim\frac{m_{\chi}}{eq_{\chi}}\,\max\big{(}m_{\chi}\,,\,L^{-1}% \big{)}\leavevmode\nobreak\ ,italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT cr end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG roman_max ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , (2)

where pair-production is exponentially suppressed for EEcrmuch-less-than𝐸subscript𝐸crE\ll E_{\text{cr}}italic_E ≪ italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT cr end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This agrees with detailed studies of the Schwinger effect in inhomogenous electric fields Kim and Page (2007); Hebenstreit (2011, 2011); Hebenstreit et al. (2011); Ruffini et al. (2010); Kim (2019).

Note that for EEcrmuch-greater-than𝐸subscript𝐸crE\gg E_{\text{cr}}italic_E ≫ italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT cr end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the above kinematic constraints are satisfied even for pχmχmuch-greater-thansubscript𝑝𝜒subscript𝑚𝜒p_{\chi}\gg m_{\chi}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≫ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, corresponding to production of relativistic mCPs. In this case, we can drop the mass in the expressions above. Also, demanding that the mCP de Broglie wavelength fits inside the coherent electric field region pχL1greater-than-or-equivalent-tosubscript𝑝𝜒𝐿1p_{\chi}L\gtrsim 1italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L ≳ 1, we find that for supercritical fields mCPs are produced with a characteristic momentum in the range

L1pχeqχE.less-than-or-similar-tosuperscript𝐿1subscript𝑝𝜒less-than-or-similar-to𝑒subscript𝑞𝜒𝐸L^{-1}\lesssim p_{\chi}\lesssim\sqrt{eq_{\chi}E}\leavevmode\nobreak\ .italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≲ italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ square-root start_ARG italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E end_ARG . (3)

Self-consistency imposes that the upper limit is greater than the lower limit in Eq. (3), which is equivalent to qχ(eEL2)1greater-than-or-equivalent-tosubscript𝑞𝜒superscript𝑒𝐸superscript𝐿21q_{\chi}\gtrsim(eE\,L^{2})^{-1}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≳ ( italic_e italic_E italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. This, along with EEcrgreater-than-or-equivalent-to𝐸subscript𝐸crE\gtrsim E_{\text{cr}}italic_E ≳ italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT cr end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, form the basic requirements for the formation of an mCP condensate, which can be expressed as the following lower bound on the mCP charge,

qχ(eE)1max[mχ2,L2].greater-than-or-equivalent-tosubscript𝑞𝜒superscript𝑒𝐸1superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜒2superscript𝐿2q_{\chi}\gtrsim(eE)^{-1}\,\max\big{[}m_{\chi}^{2}\,,\,L^{-2}\big{]}\leavevmode% \nobreak\ .italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≳ ( italic_e italic_E ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_max [ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] . (4)

Note that the kinematic arguments leading to Eq. (4) can be equivalently rephrased as demanding that EEcrgreater-than-or-equivalent-to𝐸subscript𝐸crE\gtrsim E_{\text{cr}}italic_E ≳ italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT cr end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and that both the so-called “nucleation length” mχ/(eqχE)similar-toabsentsubscript𝑚𝜒𝑒subscript𝑞𝜒𝐸\sim m_{\chi}/(eq_{\chi}\,E)∼ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ( italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E ) of the virtual mCP pair and the de Broglie wavelength after accelerating through the electric field 1/(eqχEL)similar-toabsent1𝑒subscript𝑞𝜒𝐸𝐿\sim 1/(eq_{\chi}\,EL)∼ 1 / ( italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E italic_L ) are smaller than the characteristic scale L𝐿Litalic_L of spatial variations in the electric field (see, e.g., Ref. Arvanitaki et al. (2021) and references therein). Also note that Eq. (4) is simply the requirement that the interaction is in the strong coupling regime. To see this, consider an electric field generated by charge Q𝑄Qitalic_Q, E=eQ/(4πL2)𝐸𝑒𝑄4𝜋superscript𝐿2E=eQ/(4\pi L^{2})italic_E = italic_e italic_Q / ( 4 italic_π italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ), such that Eq. (4) requires Zeffα1greater-than-or-equivalent-tosubscript𝑍eff𝛼1Z_{\text{eff}}\,\alpha\gtrsim 1italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ≳ 1, where Zeff|Qqχ|subscript𝑍eff𝑄subscript𝑞𝜒Z_{\text{eff}}\equiv|Q\,q_{\chi}|italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ | italic_Q italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT |.

If a strong magnetic field BEgreater-than-or-equivalent-to𝐵𝐸B\gtrsim Eitalic_B ≳ italic_E is also present, the growth of the bosonic condensate is hindered Kim and Page (2006). This can be derived by a simple modification to the kinematic arguments above. In this case, the energy of a spin-0 particle is increased by the lowest-lying Landau level associated with its cyclotron motion, ωLeqχB/(mχ2+pχ2)1/2similar-tosubscript𝜔𝐿𝑒subscript𝑞𝜒𝐵superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝜒2superscriptsubscript𝑝𝜒212\omega_{L}\sim eq_{\chi}\,B/(m_{\chi}^{2}+p_{\chi}^{2})^{1/2}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B / ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Thus, pair-production also requires eqχEdωLgreater-than-or-equivalent-to𝑒subscript𝑞𝜒𝐸𝑑subscript𝜔𝐿eq_{\chi}E\,d\gtrsim\omega_{L}italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E italic_d ≳ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which imposes the additional constraint EBgreater-than-or-equivalent-to𝐸𝐵E\gtrsim Bitalic_E ≳ italic_B.

Thus, if both Eq. (4) and EBgreater-than-or-equivalent-to𝐸𝐵E\gtrsim Bitalic_E ≳ italic_B are satisfied, the vacuum decays to mCP pairs initially localized within a distance L𝐿Litalic_L of the electric source. As discussed below in Secs. II.2 and II.3, in this case the mCPs that possess an attractive interaction with the source remain electrically bound, seeding a condensate that grows in density exponentially.

II.2 Time Evolution of Bound States

At the microscopic level, the growth of the charged condensate corresponds to particle pair-production, after which only a single sign of charge becomes electrically bound. To remain bound near the source of the quasistatic supercritical potential, we impose that pχeqχELless-than-or-similar-tosubscript𝑝𝜒𝑒subscript𝑞𝜒𝐸𝐿p_{\chi}\lesssim eq_{\chi}\,ELitalic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E italic_L. Note that this is in fact already guaranteed from Eqs. (3) and (4). Thus, such mCPs with momenta in the full kinematic range of Eq. (3) remain localized near the source. The species of opposite charge is instead accelerated away to far distances, setting up a millicharge asymmetry.

As the phase space of the bound population continues to grow, it quickly exceeds that of the unbound mCPs and stimulates further pair-production at an exponential rate. Steady state is attained only once the stable ground state of the theory is reached, corresponding to when the charge of the bound population efficiently screens the electric source to be subcritical Klein and Rafelski (1978); Greiner et al. (2012); Rafelski et al. (1978).

Here, we show that this final configuration can be attained on microscopic timescales. Let us begin by reviewing the Schwinger production rate of charged scalar particles for supercritical electric fields EEcrmuch-greater-than𝐸subscript𝐸crE\gg E_{\text{cr}}italic_E ≫ italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT cr end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Approximating the momentum distribution as isotropic and flat up to a maximum momentum of pχeqχEless-than-or-similar-tosubscript𝑝𝜒𝑒subscript𝑞𝜒𝐸p_{\chi}\lesssim\sqrt{eq_{\chi}\,E}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ square-root start_ARG italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E end_ARG, the phase space density of a bound species evolves according to dfχ/dtΓχ(1+fχ)similar-to-or-equals𝑑subscript𝑓𝜒𝑑𝑡subscriptΓ𝜒1subscript𝑓𝜒df_{\chi}/dt\simeq\Gamma_{\chi}\,(1+f_{\chi})italic_d italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_d italic_t ≃ roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 + italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) Nishida (2021). The growth rate is given by

Γχ34πΔVVeqχE,similar-to-or-equalssubscriptΓ𝜒34𝜋Δ𝑉𝑉𝑒subscript𝑞𝜒𝐸\displaystyle\Gamma_{\chi}\simeq\frac{3}{4\pi}\,\frac{\Delta V}{V}\,\sqrt{eq_{% \chi}\,E}\leavevmode\nobreak\ ,roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG divide start_ARG roman_Δ italic_V end_ARG start_ARG italic_V end_ARG square-root start_ARG italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E end_ARG , (5)

where ΔV/V1Δ𝑉𝑉1\Delta V/V\leq 1roman_Δ italic_V / italic_V ≤ 1 is a geometric volume penalty to be discussed below Eq. (10). Integrating fχsubscript𝑓𝜒f_{\chi}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over momentum and taking fχ1much-less-thansubscript𝑓𝜒1f_{\chi}\ll 1italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ 1 and ΔV/V=1Δ𝑉𝑉1\Delta V/V=1roman_Δ italic_V / italic_V = 1 yields the standard form for the Schwinger rate Kim and Page (2006); Cohen and McGady (2008).

For mCPs χ𝜒\chiitalic_χ that remain electrically bound to the source, the phase space occupancy accumulates over time, leading to exponential growth within a time tΓχ1similar-to𝑡superscriptsubscriptΓ𝜒1t\sim\Gamma_{\chi}^{-1}italic_t ∼ roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT,

fχeΓχt1.similar-to-or-equalssubscript𝑓𝜒superscript𝑒subscriptΓ𝜒𝑡1f_{\chi}\simeq e^{\Gamma_{\chi}t}-1\leavevmode\nobreak\ .italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 . (6)

Instead, the oppositely-charged mCPs (denoted as χ¯¯𝜒\bar{\chi}over¯ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG) are unbound and quickly evacuated from the region. Thus, their phase space only grows within the time ΔtLsimilar-to-or-equalsΔ𝑡𝐿\Delta t\simeq Lroman_Δ italic_t ≃ italic_L it takes such particles to exit the region of the coherent electric field. The phase space of this population is therefore

fχ¯Γχt0t𝑑t(1+fχ(t)),similar-to-or-equalssubscript𝑓¯𝜒subscriptΓ𝜒superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑡0𝑡differential-dsuperscript𝑡1subscript𝑓𝜒superscript𝑡f_{\bar{\chi}}\simeq\Gamma_{\chi}\,\int_{t_{0}}^{t}dt^{\prime}\leavevmode% \nobreak\ \big{(}1+f_{\chi}(t^{\prime})\big{)}\leavevmode\nobreak\ ,italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 + italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) , (7)

where t0max(0,tL)subscript𝑡00𝑡𝐿t_{0}\equiv\max{(0,t-L)}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ roman_max ( 0 , italic_t - italic_L ). This can be evaluated using Eq. (6),

fχ¯eΓχteΓχt0.similar-to-or-equalssubscript𝑓¯𝜒superscript𝑒subscriptΓ𝜒𝑡superscript𝑒subscriptΓ𝜒subscript𝑡0f_{\bar{\chi}}\simeq e^{\Gamma_{\chi}t}-e^{\Gamma_{\chi}t_{0}}\leavevmode% \nobreak\ .italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (8)

Since we are interested in the charge density, we take the difference of Eqs. (6) and (8),

f±fχfχ¯eΓχt01.subscript𝑓plus-or-minussubscript𝑓𝜒subscript𝑓¯𝜒similar-to-or-equalssuperscript𝑒subscriptΓ𝜒subscript𝑡01f_{\pm}\equiv f_{\chi}-f_{\bar{\chi}}\simeq e^{\Gamma_{\chi}t_{0}}-1% \leavevmode\nobreak\ .italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 . (9)

Integrating Eq. (9) over momentum space and multiplying by the per-particle charge then yields the total charge density

ρ±eqχ(eqχE)3/26π2(eΓχt01).similar-to-or-equalssubscript𝜌plus-or-minus𝑒subscript𝑞𝜒superscript𝑒subscript𝑞𝜒𝐸326superscript𝜋2superscript𝑒subscriptΓ𝜒subscript𝑡01\rho_{\pm}\simeq\frac{eq_{\chi}\,(eq_{\chi}\,E)^{3/2}}{6\pi^{2}}\leavevmode% \nobreak\ \big{(}e^{\Gamma_{\chi}t_{0}}-1\big{)}\leavevmode\nobreak\ .italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ divide start_ARG italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 6 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 ) . (10)

Typically, the volume ΔVΔ𝑉\Delta Vroman_Δ italic_V over which pair-production can efficiently stimulate further production is much smaller than the total volume occupied by the bound mCPs. In this case, the e𝑒eitalic_e-fold rate is suppressed by the ratio ΔV/VΔ𝑉𝑉\Delta V/Vroman_Δ italic_V / italic_V, as in Eq. (5). For instance, bound mCPs produced in a supercritical Coulomb field are quickly accelerated to a momentum beyond the upper limit of Eq. (3) within a radial distance of 1/eqχEsimilar-to-or-equals1𝑒subscript𝑞𝜒𝐸\ell\simeq 1/\sqrt{eq_{\chi}E}roman_ℓ ≃ 1 / square-root start_ARG italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E end_ARG, suppressing the degree of phase space overlap. Hence, the only mCPs that can Bose-enhance further production of mCPs at a radius r𝑟ritalic_r are those produced within a narrow radial shell of thickness 2similar-toabsent2\sim 2\ell∼ 2 roman_ℓ centered at r𝑟ritalic_r. When this length scale is much smaller than the range L𝐿Litalic_L of the electric field, ΓχsubscriptΓ𝜒\Gamma_{\chi}roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is thus suppressed by this small volume contributing to Bose-enhanced production ΔV/V2/L2/eqχEL2similar-to-or-equalsΔ𝑉𝑉2𝐿similar-to-or-equals2𝑒subscript𝑞𝜒𝐸superscript𝐿2\Delta V/V\simeq 2\ell/L\simeq 2/\sqrt{eq_{\chi}EL^{2}}roman_Δ italic_V / italic_V ≃ 2 roman_ℓ / italic_L ≃ 2 / square-root start_ARG italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG. Using this in Eq. (5), we find that for charges satisfying Eq. (4) the growth rate is parametrically Γχ3/(2πL)similar-to-or-equalssubscriptΓ𝜒32𝜋𝐿\Gamma_{\chi}\simeq 3/(2\pi L)roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ 3 / ( 2 italic_π italic_L ), independent of the charge qχsubscript𝑞𝜒q_{\chi}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This is to be expected as the lower bound on the growth rate; after an mCP that is electrically bound to a quasistatic source traverses a full orbit, it returns to its initial phase space point, thus stimulating further production of mCPs within this same phase space region.

II.3 Klein-Gordon in a Coulomb Potential

Here, we verify these heuristic arguments by solving for the time-evolution of the mCP Klein-Gordon field in an attractive Coulomb-like potential (for related calculations, see, e.g., the various examples presented in Ref. Greiner (2000)). This is done by solving for the eigenfrequency ω𝜔\omegaitalic_ω, whose positive imaginary value indicates an instability to the theory and the exponential growth of the charged scalar field. This is therefore qualitatively similar to the process of superradiance Ternov et al. (1978); Zouros and Eardley (1979); Detweiler (1980); Arvanitaki et al. (2010); Arvanitaki and Dubovsky (2011), in which a spinning (and possibly charged Bekenstein (1973); Bosch et al. (2016)) black hole gives rise to rapid growth of a gravitationally bound bosonic cloud. However, in our case, an important difference arises in the fact that the trapping potential is set solely by electromagnetic interactions and thus does not decouple in the small mass limit.

The Klein-Gordon equation for a millicharged scalar field ϕχ(𝐱,t)=eiωtϕχ(𝐱)subscriptitalic-ϕ𝜒𝐱𝑡superscript𝑒𝑖𝜔𝑡subscriptitalic-ϕ𝜒𝐱\phi_{\chi}({\bf x},t)=e^{-i\omega t}\,\phi_{\chi}({\bf x})italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_x , italic_t ) = italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_i italic_ω italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_x ) coupled to an electrostatic potential V(𝐱)𝑉𝐱V({\bf x})italic_V ( bold_x ) is given by

[2mχ2+(ωV(𝐱))2]ϕχ(𝐱)=0.delimited-[]superscript2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜒2superscript𝜔𝑉𝐱2subscriptitalic-ϕ𝜒𝐱0\Big{[}\nabla^{2}-m_{\chi}^{2}+\big{(}\omega-V({\bf x})\big{)}^{2}\Big{]}\,% \phi_{\chi}({\bf x})=0\leavevmode\nobreak\ .[ ∇ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( italic_ω - italic_V ( bold_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_x ) = 0 . (11)

For a spherically-symmetric potential V(𝐱)=V(r)𝑉𝐱𝑉𝑟V({\bf x})=V(r)italic_V ( bold_x ) = italic_V ( italic_r ), the field can be factorized into radial and angular components ϕχ(𝐱)=(R(r)/r)Y(θ,ϕ)subscriptitalic-ϕ𝜒𝐱𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑌𝜃italic-ϕ\phi_{\chi}({\bf x})=(R(r)/r)\,Y(\theta,\phi)italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_x ) = ( italic_R ( italic_r ) / italic_r ) italic_Y ( italic_θ , italic_ϕ ), where Y(θ,ϕ)𝑌𝜃italic-ϕY(\theta,\phi)italic_Y ( italic_θ , italic_ϕ ) are the usual spherical harmonics. Using this in Eq. (11), the radial wavefunction satisfies

(d2dr2(+1)r2+k(r)2)R(r)=0,superscript𝑑2𝑑superscript𝑟21superscript𝑟2𝑘superscript𝑟2𝑅𝑟0\bigg{(}\frac{d^{2}}{dr^{2}}-\frac{\ell(\ell+1)}{r^{2}}+k(r)^{2}\bigg{)}\,R(r)% =0\leavevmode\nobreak\ ,( divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG roman_ℓ ( roman_ℓ + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + italic_k ( italic_r ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_R ( italic_r ) = 0 , (12)

where \ellroman_ℓ is the standard azimuthal quantum number and we defined k(r)2(ωV(r))2mχ2𝑘superscript𝑟2superscript𝜔𝑉𝑟2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜒2k(r)^{2}\equiv(\omega-V(r))^{2}-m_{\chi}^{2}italic_k ( italic_r ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≡ ( italic_ω - italic_V ( italic_r ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

As a representative toy model, we adopt an attractive potential energy of the form of a spherical shell of charge Q𝑄Qitalic_Q and radius L𝐿Litalic_L. In particular, we take

V(r)={Zeffα/r(rL)Zeffα/L(rL),𝑉𝑟casessubscript𝑍eff𝛼𝑟𝑟𝐿subscript𝑍eff𝛼𝐿𝑟𝐿V(r)=\begin{cases}-Z_{\text{eff}}\,\alpha/r&(r\geq L)\\ -Z_{\text{eff}}\,\alpha/L&(r\leq L)\leavevmode\nobreak\ ,\end{cases}italic_V ( italic_r ) = { start_ROW start_CELL - italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α / italic_r end_CELL start_CELL ( italic_r ≥ italic_L ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL - italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α / italic_L end_CELL start_CELL ( italic_r ≤ italic_L ) , end_CELL end_ROW (13)

where α𝛼\alphaitalic_α is the fine-structure constant and Zeff=|Qqχ|subscript𝑍eff𝑄subscript𝑞𝜒Z_{\text{eff}}=|Q\,q_{\chi}|italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = | italic_Q italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | is the product of the shell’s and scalar field’s charge (in units of the electric charge).

Outside of the shell (r>L𝑟𝐿r>Litalic_r > italic_L), V(r)𝑉𝑟V(r)italic_V ( italic_r ) is a standard Coulomb potential. In this case, Rout(r)=coutWλ,μ(βr)subscript𝑅out𝑟subscript𝑐outsubscript𝑊𝜆𝜇𝛽𝑟R_{\text{out}}(r)=c_{\text{out}}\,W_{\lambda,\mu}(\beta r)italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT out end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_r ) = italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT out end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_W start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ , italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_β italic_r ), where coutsubscript𝑐outc_{\text{out}}italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT out end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a normalization constant, β2(mχ2ω2)1/2𝛽2superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝜒2superscript𝜔212\beta\equiv 2(m_{\chi}^{2}-\omega^{2})^{1/2}italic_β ≡ 2 ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and Wλ,μsubscript𝑊𝜆𝜇W_{\lambda,\mu}italic_W start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ , italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a Whittaker function with the subscripts defined as Greiner (2000)

λ2Zeffαωβ,μ2(+12)2(Zeffα)2.\lambda\equiv\frac{2Z_{\text{eff}}\,\alpha\,\omega}{\beta}\leavevmode\nobreak% \ \leavevmode\nobreak\ ,\leavevmode\nobreak\ \leavevmode\nobreak\ \mu^{2}% \equiv\Big{(}\ell+\frac{1}{2}\Big{)}^{2}-(Z_{\text{eff}}\,\alpha)^{2}% \leavevmode\nobreak\ .italic_λ ≡ divide start_ARG 2 italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_ω end_ARG start_ARG italic_β end_ARG , italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≡ ( roman_ℓ + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (14)

Inside the shell (r<L𝑟𝐿r<Litalic_r < italic_L), V(r)𝑉𝑟V(r)italic_V ( italic_r ) is instead a constant. Solving Eq. (12) and neglecting solutions singular at the origin, we find Rin(r)=cinrj(kinr)subscript𝑅in𝑟subscript𝑐in𝑟subscript𝑗subscript𝑘in𝑟R_{\text{in}}(r)=c_{\text{in}}\,r\,j_{\ell}(k_{\text{in}}r)italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT in end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_r ) = italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT in end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ℓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT in end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r ), where cinsubscript𝑐inc_{\text{in}}italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT in end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a normalization constant, jsubscript𝑗j_{\ell}italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ℓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a spherical Bessel function, and kin2(ω+Zeffα/L)2mχ2superscriptsubscript𝑘in2superscript𝜔subscript𝑍eff𝛼𝐿2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜒2k_{\text{in}}^{2}\equiv(\omega+Z_{\text{eff}}\,\alpha/L)^{2}-m_{\chi}^{2}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT in end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≡ ( italic_ω + italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α / italic_L ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

The eigenfrequency ω𝜔\omegaitalic_ω is determined by matching the wavefunction and its first derivative at the shell boundary, which amounts to numerically solving Rout(L)/Rout(L)=Rin(L)/Rin(L)subscriptsuperscript𝑅out𝐿subscript𝑅out𝐿subscriptsuperscript𝑅in𝐿subscript𝑅in𝐿R^{\,\prime}_{\text{out}}(L)/R_{\text{out}}(L)=R^{\,\prime}_{\text{in}}(L)/R_{% \text{in}}(L)italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT out end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_L ) / italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT out end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_L ) = italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT in end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_L ) / italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT in end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_L ). For Zeffα1much-less-thansubscript𝑍eff𝛼1Z_{\text{eff}}\,\alpha\ll 1italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ≪ 1 and mχ1/(ZeffαL)much-less-thansubscript𝑚𝜒1subscript𝑍eff𝛼𝐿m_{\chi}\ll 1/(Z_{\text{eff}}\,\alpha\,L)italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ 1 / ( italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_L ), this yields Im(ω)=0Im𝜔0\text{Im}(\omega)=0Im ( italic_ω ) = 0 and the standard atomic energy levels, Re(ω)mχ(Zeffα)2/2n2similar-to-or-equalsRe𝜔subscript𝑚𝜒superscriptsubscript𝑍eff𝛼22superscript𝑛2\text{Re}(\omega)\simeq m_{\chi}-(Z_{\text{eff}}\,\alpha)^{2}/2n^{2}Re ( italic_ω ) ≃ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ( italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where n𝑛nitalic_n is a positive integer. Instead, for Zeffα1much-greater-thansubscript𝑍eff𝛼1Z_{\text{eff}}\,\alpha\gg 1italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ≫ 1 and mχ1/Lmuch-less-thansubscript𝑚𝜒1𝐿m_{\chi}\ll 1/Litalic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ 1 / italic_L, ω𝜔\omegaitalic_ω develops a positive imaginary component Γχ2Im(ω)>0subscriptΓ𝜒2Im𝜔0\Gamma_{\chi}\equiv 2\,\text{Im}(\omega)>0roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ 2 Im ( italic_ω ) > 0, corresponding to exponential growth. In particular, in this case we find that the growth rate for the =00\ell=0roman_ℓ = 0 state can be roughly approximated by

Γχ12L(1πnZeffα)similar-to-or-equalssubscriptΓ𝜒12𝐿1𝜋𝑛subscript𝑍eff𝛼\Gamma_{\chi}\simeq\frac{1}{2L}\,\Big{(}1-\frac{\pi n}{Z_{\text{eff}}\,\alpha}% \Big{)}roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_L end_ARG ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_π italic_n end_ARG start_ARG italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_ARG ) (15)

for Re(ω)(Zeffα+πn/2)/L<0similar-to-or-equalsRe𝜔subscript𝑍eff𝛼𝜋𝑛2𝐿0\text{Re}(\omega)\simeq(-Z_{\text{eff}}\,\alpha+\pi n/2)/L<0Re ( italic_ω ) ≃ ( - italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α + italic_π italic_n / 2 ) / italic_L < 0, where nZeffα/πless-than-or-similar-to𝑛subscript𝑍eff𝛼𝜋n\lesssim Z_{\text{eff}}\,\alpha/\piitalic_n ≲ italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT eff end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α / italic_π is a positive integer. This qualitatively agrees with the discussion in Sec. II.2.

Thus, the field and corresponding charge density ρ±subscript𝜌plus-or-minus\rho_{\pm}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT grow exponentially, set by the rate Γχ1/Lsimilar-tosubscriptΓ𝜒1𝐿\Gamma_{\chi}\sim 1/Lroman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 1 / italic_L, as in Eq. (10). This growth saturates when ρ±subscript𝜌plus-or-minus\rho_{\pm}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT screens the source, such that the total field is subcritical, i.e., once ρ±(t)E/Lsimilar-tosubscript𝜌plus-or-minus𝑡𝐸𝐿\rho_{\pm}(t)\sim E/Litalic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) ∼ italic_E / italic_L within a time tLlog(1/qχ)similar-to𝑡𝐿1subscript𝑞𝜒t\sim L\,\log{(1/q_{\chi})}italic_t ∼ italic_L roman_log ( 1 / italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ).111Equivalently, the growth saturates once the work done in accelerating the unbound mCPs drains the electric energy. To see this, note that ρ±E/Lsimilar-tosubscript𝜌plus-or-minus𝐸𝐿\rho_{\pm}\sim E/Litalic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_E / italic_L corresponds to a total of NχEL2/qχsimilar-tosubscript𝑁𝜒𝐸superscript𝐿2subscript𝑞𝜒N_{\chi}\sim E\,L^{2}/q_{\chi}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_E italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT produced pairs. The work done in ejecting the unbound mCPs is therefore NχqχELE2L3similar-tosubscript𝑁𝜒subscript𝑞𝜒𝐸𝐿superscript𝐸2superscript𝐿3N_{\chi}\,q_{\chi}\,E\,L\sim E^{2}\,L^{3}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E italic_L ∼ italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, comparable to the total energy stored in the initial electric field configuration. We expect this growth to hold even in the presence of additional mCP reactions, provided that they conserve charge (such as annihilations to photons or dark photons), since these do not alter the total charge density. Furthermore, we do not expect scattering between mCPs and the environment to significantly alter the growth of the condensate. This is because for the values of qχsubscript𝑞𝜒q_{\chi}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT considered here, the time after which an mCP is likely to upscatter off of terrestrial matter and become unbound is many orders of magnitude longer than the time Γχ1Lsimilar-tosuperscriptsubscriptΓ𝜒1𝐿\Gamma_{\chi}^{-1}\sim Lroman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ italic_L to grow the condensate by an additional e𝑒eitalic_e-fold.222Note that this is unlike black hole superradiance. In that case, the instability is only present for a comparatively narrow range of Re(ω)Re𝜔\text{Re}(\omega)Re ( italic_ω ), and the corresponding e𝑒eitalic_e-fold timescale Γχ1superscriptsubscriptΓ𝜒1\Gamma_{\chi}^{-1}roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is parametrically longer than the light-crossing time Arvanitaki and Dubovsky (2011). As a result, the development of the superradiant instability is more sensitive to non-linearities from gravitational and self-interaction effects.

The detailed spatial structure of this late-time steady state charge configuration is dictated parametrically by the momenta of mCPs and is stabilized by Coulomb self-interactions. For explicit studies along these lines, see, e.g., Refs. Klein and Rafelski (1978); Greiner et al. (2012); Rafelski et al. (1978). Here, we are mainly interested in the timescale of the transition to this final state. In the sections below, we consider several examples of quasistatic electric sources, which can be discharged by mCPs well within the time it takes the condensate to grow by 102similar-toabsentsuperscript102\sim 10^{2}∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT e𝑒eitalic_e-folds. Thus, the successful operation of these sources can be used to exclude the existence of ultralight bosonic mCPs directly charged under electromagnetism.

III Van de Graaff Generators

From Eq. (4), we see that devices that operate large, long-ranged, and approximately static electric potentials are ideal for enhancing the sensitivity. In this section, we focus on the largest air-insulated Van de Graaff generator, which is operated for public display at the Theater of Electricity at the Boston Museum of Science of Science .

This generator consists of two joined spheres, each of approximately 4.5m4.5m4.5\ \text{m}4.5 m in diameter and mounted on 7.5m7.5m7.5\ \text{m}7.5 m tall poles, producing an average voltage of 2MV2MV2\ \text{MV}2 MV at its surface. This implies that mCP pair-production can occur over a large volume, since the sourced electric field dominates over Earth’s magnetic field within the large viewing auditorium out to a distance of L10mgreater-than-or-equivalent-to𝐿10mL\gtrsim 10\ \text{m}italic_L ≳ 10 m. As representative conservative values, we therefore take E0.5MV/msimilar-to𝐸0.5MVmE\sim 0.5\ \text{MV}/\text{m}italic_E ∼ 0.5 MV / m and L5msimilar-to𝐿5mL\sim 5\ \text{m}italic_L ∼ 5 m. From Eq. (4), this implies that an mCP condensate quickly forms for mχ108eVmuch-less-thansubscript𝑚𝜒superscript108eVm_{\chi}\ll 10^{-8}\ \text{eV}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 8 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT eV and qχ1014greater-than-or-equivalent-tosubscript𝑞𝜒superscript1014q_{\chi}\gtrsim 10^{-14}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≳ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 14 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, shorting-out the generator well within the time of 1ssimilar-toabsent1s\sim 1\ \text{s}∼ 1 s it takes to charge and discharge the device on a nearby conductor. The resulting upper bound on the mCP charge is shown as the line labelled “Van de Graaff” in Fig. 2. Note that this is comparable to existing astrophysical limits derived from considerations of stellar evolution Davidson et al. (2000); Vogel and Redondo (2014); Fung et al. (2023).

IV Terrestrial Electricity

IV.1 Thunderstorms

Strong long-ranged electric fields are also present in Earth’s atmosphere. The largest of such electrical activity occurs in thunderstorms. In particular, balloon measurements show that thunderclouds maintain fields of E102kV/msimilar-to𝐸superscript102kVmE\sim 10^{2}\ \text{kV}/\text{m}italic_E ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT kV / m due to internal charge separation on length scales of L1kmsimilar-to𝐿1kmL\sim 1\ \text{km}italic_L ∼ 1 km, evolving on timescales of minutes Thu (1986). Hence, we can roughly model the electric charge configuration within a thundercloud as that of a km-scale parallel plate capacitor. Such a charge arrangement can lead to a bound condensate of mCPs, since near either charge overdensity in the thundercloud, an mCP experiences a local minimum/maximum in its electrostatic potential. Applying the results of Sec. II.1, we find that within a millisecond, a millicharged condensate would screen such electrical configurations for qχ1018greater-than-or-equivalent-tosubscript𝑞𝜒superscript1018q_{\chi}\gtrsim 10^{-18}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≳ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 18 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and mχ1010eVless-than-or-similar-tosubscript𝑚𝜒superscript1010eVm_{\chi}\lesssim 10^{-10}\ \text{eV}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 10 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT eV. The resulting bound is shown as the line labelled “thunderstorms” in Fig. 2.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: New limits on scalar millicharged particles, as a function of charge qχsubscript𝑞𝜒q_{\chi}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and mass mχsubscript𝑚𝜒m_{\chi}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, from the existence of long-ranged electric fields. These include electric fields generated by the air-insulated Van de Graaff generator at the Boston Museum of Science (solid red), thunderstorms (dashed dark blue), and the fair-weather atmosphere (dotted light blue), which would be shorted-out by the production of millicharged particles on microsecond, millisecond, and second timescales, respectively. The first two of these limits are valid for millicharged particles that directly couple to electromagnetism, or indirectly couple via an ultralight dark photon with 𝒪(1)𝒪1\mathcal{O}{(1)}caligraphic_O ( 1 ) kinetic mixing parameter, whereas the last of these limits solely applies to interactions mediated by 𝒪(1)𝒪1\mathcal{O}{(1)}caligraphic_O ( 1 ) kinetically-mixed dark photons with mass 1013eV1011eVsuperscript1013eVsuperscript1011eV10^{-13}\ \text{eV}-10^{-11}\ \text{eV}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 13 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT eV - 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT eV (see Secs. IV and V for additional details). Parameter space excluded from the consideration of stellar evolution is shown as the shaded gray region Davidson et al. (2000); Vogel and Redondo (2014); Fung et al. (2023). Also shown as a dotted gray line is the upper bound qχ(4π/e)(mχ/Λ)less-than-or-similar-tosubscript𝑞𝜒4𝜋𝑒subscript𝑚𝜒Λq_{\chi}\lesssim(4\pi/e)\,(m_{\chi}/\Lambda)italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ( 4 italic_π / italic_e ) ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_Λ ) as imposed by technical naturalness, assuming an ultraviolet cutoff of Λ=10TeVΛ10TeV\Lambda=10\ \text{TeV}roman_Λ = 10 TeV.

IV.2 Atmosphere

Atmospheric electric fields also exist during fair-weather conditions, although at much smaller strengths. This consists of a downward pointing field of E102V/msimilar-to𝐸superscript102VmE\sim 10^{2}\ \text{V}/\text{m}italic_E ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT V / m in the L50kmsimilar-to𝐿50kmL\sim 50\ \text{km}italic_L ∼ 50 km region spanning from the ionosphere to the crust Feynman et al. (1963). This voltage difference maintains equilibrium by the counteracting effects of the small global current of free ions and lightning strikes during thunderstorms, which alone would discharge or charge up the Earth on the scale of minutes, respectively.

Note that Earth’s magnetic field B0.5G10kV/msimilar-to𝐵0.5Gsimilar-to10kVmB\sim 0.5\ \text{G}\sim 10\ \text{kV}/\text{m}italic_B ∼ 0.5 G ∼ 10 kV / m near the surface is much larger than these fair-weather electric fields, which exponentially suppresses the growth of an mCP condensate directly charged under electromagnetism, as discussed in Sec. II.1. An exception to this arises, however, if the mCP interaction is mediated by an ultralight kinetically-mixed dark photon Asuperscript𝐴A^{\prime}italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, whose Compton wavelength 1/mAsimilar-toabsent1subscript𝑚superscript𝐴\sim 1/m_{A^{\prime}}∼ 1 / italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is much larger than the distance L𝐿Litalic_L between the crust and ionosphere and much shorter than the distance r3×103kmsimilar-to𝑟3superscript103kmr\sim 3\times 10^{3}\ \text{km}italic_r ∼ 3 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT km to the fluid outer core from which the magnetic field is sourced. In this case, the charge separation between the crust and ionosphere generates an atmospheric dark electric field EϵEsimilar-tosuperscript𝐸italic-ϵ𝐸E^{\prime}\sim\epsilon\,Eitalic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ italic_ϵ italic_E, and the core sources a dark magnetic field BϵB×emArsimilar-tosuperscript𝐵italic-ϵ𝐵superscript𝑒subscript𝑚superscript𝐴𝑟B^{\prime}\sim\epsilon\,B\times e^{-m_{A^{\prime}}\,r}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ italic_ϵ italic_B × italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where ϵ1less-than-or-similar-toitalic-ϵ1\epsilon\lesssim 1italic_ϵ ≲ 1 is the dark photon kinetic mixing parameter. Thus, for dark photon masses of 1013eVmA1011eVmuch-less-thansuperscript1013eVsubscript𝑚superscript𝐴much-less-thansuperscript1011eV10^{-13}\ \text{eV}\ll m_{A^{\prime}}\ll 10^{-11}\ \text{eV}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 13 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT eV ≪ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT eV, Esuperscript𝐸E^{\prime}italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is solely suppressed by ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ, whereas BEmuch-less-thansuperscript𝐵superscript𝐸B^{\prime}\ll E^{\prime}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≪ italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is additionally exponentially suppressed by the nonzero dark photon mass.

In this model-space, dark Schwinger production leads to an mCP condensate that instead screens Esuperscript𝐸E^{\prime}italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. As a result, the condensate possesses an effective visible charge density of ρ±ϵE/Lϵ2E/Lsimilar-tosubscript𝜌plus-or-minusitalic-ϵsuperscript𝐸𝐿similar-tosuperscriptitalic-ϵ2𝐸𝐿\rho_{\pm}\sim\epsilon\,E^{\prime}/L\sim\epsilon^{2}\,E/Litalic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_ϵ italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_L ∼ italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_E / italic_L on length scales smaller than 1/mAsimilar-toabsent1subscript𝑚superscript𝐴\sim 1/m_{A^{\prime}}∼ 1 / italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Therefore, instead of screening the visible electric field by an 𝒪(1)𝒪1\mathcal{O}{(1)}caligraphic_O ( 1 ) fraction, the mCP condensate reduces it by a factor of (1ϵ2)similar-toabsent1superscriptitalic-ϵ2\sim(1-\epsilon^{2})∼ ( 1 - italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ), provided that the effective visible charge of mCPs qχ=ϵe/esubscript𝑞𝜒italic-ϵsuperscript𝑒𝑒q_{\chi}=\epsilon\,e^{\prime}/eitalic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ϵ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_e satisfies Eq. (4), where esuperscript𝑒e^{\prime}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the Asuperscript𝐴A^{\prime}italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT gauge coupling. Note that compared to the expression provided in Eq. (5), in this case the e𝑒eitalic_e-fold rate is additionally suppressed by the relative size of the atmosphere and the radius of the Earth (50km/104km)102similar-toabsent50kmsuperscript104kmsimilar-tosuperscript102\sim(50\ \text{km}/10^{4}\ \text{km})\sim 10^{-2}∼ ( 50 km / 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT km ) ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, corresponding to the small probability that an mCP bound to the electric field of the Earth is within the region in which pair-production occurs.

This calculation shows that for kinetic mixing parameters close to their perturbative limit ϵ1similar-toitalic-ϵ1\epsilon\sim 1italic_ϵ ∼ 1, a dark photon mediated mCP condensate leads to observable effects that are similar to those for a condensate that is directly charged under normal electromagnetism. The resulting bound for ϵ1similar-toitalic-ϵ1\epsilon\sim 1italic_ϵ ∼ 1 is shown as the line labelled “atmosphere” in Fig. 2. Although the simplest models in this parameter space are already excluded by cosmological bounds on dark photons Mirizzi et al. (2009a, b); Kunze and Vázquez-Mozo (2015); Caputo et al. (2020a, b); Garcia et al. (2020), in certain models such limits can be relaxed considerably by in-medium effects Masso and Redondo (2006); DeRocco et al. (2020); Berlin et al. (2023).

V Detection of Effective mCPs

The previous section showed that the millicharged condensate completely screens the electric source if the interactions are mediated directly by the Standard Model photon or indirectly by an ultralight dark photon with 𝒪(1)𝒪1\mathcal{O}{(1)}caligraphic_O ( 1 ) kinetic mixing parameter ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ. Instead, when ϵ1much-less-thanitalic-ϵ1\epsilon\ll 1italic_ϵ ≪ 1, the sources discussed above are only screened at a fractional level of ϵ21much-less-thansuperscriptitalic-ϵ21\epsilon^{2}\ll 1italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≪ 1. In this case, although large voltage sources do not exclude the existence of ultralight bosonic mCPs, they can still lead to a large number density of such dark sector particles.

This ambient millicharge density near regions of large electrical activity leads to smaller effects that can nonetheless be detected by precision sensors of weak electromagnetic fields. As a representative example, let’s first consider the final e𝑒eitalic_e-fold growth of the condensate. During this stage, there is also a burst of unbound mCPs that are repelled from the voltage source, which leads to a visible electromagnetic current of j±ρ±ϵ2E/Lsimilar-tosubscript𝑗plus-or-minussubscript𝜌plus-or-minussimilar-tosuperscriptitalic-ϵ2𝐸𝐿j_{\pm}\sim\rho_{\pm}\sim\epsilon^{2}E/Litalic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_E / italic_L. This current, consisting of extremely feebly interacting mCPs can traverse into shielded environments, inducing signal magnetic fields of size Bχϵ2ER/Lsimilar-tosubscript𝐵𝜒superscriptitalic-ϵ2𝐸𝑅𝐿B_{\chi}\sim\epsilon^{2}E\,R/Litalic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_E italic_R / italic_L, where R𝑅Ritalic_R is the size of the shielded region. Note that for RL/10similar-to𝑅𝐿10R\sim L/10italic_R ∼ italic_L / 10 and E1MV/msimilar-to𝐸1MVmE\sim 1\ \text{MV}/\text{m}italic_E ∼ 1 MV / m, this gives Bχ1014Tgreater-than-or-equivalent-tosubscript𝐵𝜒superscript1014TB_{\chi}\gtrsim 10^{-14}\ \text{T}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≳ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 14 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT T for ϵ105greater-than-or-equivalent-toitalic-ϵsuperscript105\epsilon\gtrsim 10^{-5}italic_ϵ ≳ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, which is above the threshold sensitivity of existing SQUID magnetometers Anton et al. (2013).

It may also be possible to directly detect the asymptotic charge density of bound mCPs using the recently proposed “direct deflection” setup, as studied in Refs. Berlin et al. (2020); Berlin and Schutz (2022). In this case, mCP densities are detected by distorting their local flow with a region involving an oscillating electric field (note that in this case, this oscillating electric field is, in principle, distinct from the large quasistatic field responsible for the production of mCPs). This phase-space distortion leads to small oscillating electromagnetic fields, which can then be measured with a shielded resonant detector, such as an LC circuit.

In Ref. Berlin et al. (2020), it was found that a local dark matter density consisting of mCPs could be detected with such a setup for dark matter charges as small as qDM1014×(mDM/keV)similar-tosubscript𝑞DMsuperscript1014subscript𝑚DMkeVq_{{}_{\text{DM}}}\sim 10^{-14}\times(m_{{}_{\text{DM}}}/\text{keV})italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT DM end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 14 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT DM end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / keV ), where mDMsubscript𝑚DMm_{{}_{\text{DM}}}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT DM end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the dark matter mass. As discussed in Refs. Berlin et al. (2020); Berlin and Schutz (2022), we can recast the reach of a direct deflection experiment by equating the mCP-induced Debye masses in either case,

eqχρ±pχ(eqDM)2ρDM(mDMvDM)2,similar-to𝑒subscript𝑞𝜒subscript𝜌plus-or-minussubscript𝑝𝜒superscript𝑒subscript𝑞DM2subscript𝜌DMsuperscriptsubscript𝑚DMsubscript𝑣DM2\frac{eq_{\chi}\,\rho_{\pm}}{p_{\chi}}\sim\frac{(eq_{{}_{\text{DM}}})^{2}\,% \rho_{{}_{\text{DM}}}}{(m_{{}_{\text{DM}}}v_{{}_{\text{DM}}})^{2}}\leavevmode% \nobreak\ ,divide start_ARG italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∼ divide start_ARG ( italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT DM end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT DM end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT DM end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT DM end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (16)

where ρDM0.4GeV/cm3similar-to-or-equalssubscript𝜌DM0.4GeVsuperscriptcm3\rho_{{}_{\text{DM}}}\simeq 0.4\ \text{GeV}/\text{cm}^{3}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT DM end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ 0.4 GeV / cm start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and vDM103similar-tosubscript𝑣DMsuperscript103v_{{}_{\text{DM}}}\sim 10^{-3}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT DM end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are the local dark matter mass density and velocity, respectively. Taking ρ±ϵ2E/Lsimilar-tosubscript𝜌plus-or-minussuperscriptitalic-ϵ2𝐸𝐿\rho_{\pm}\sim\epsilon^{2}\,E/Litalic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_E / italic_L, pχeqχEsimilar-tosubscript𝑝𝜒𝑒subscript𝑞𝜒𝐸p_{\chi}\sim\sqrt{eq_{\chi}\,E}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ square-root start_ARG italic_e italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E end_ARG, and qχ(eEL2)1similar-tosubscript𝑞𝜒superscript𝑒𝐸superscript𝐿21q_{\chi}\sim(eE\,L^{2})^{-1}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ ( italic_e italic_E italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in Eq. (16), we find that this is sensitive to kinetic mixing parameters as small as ϵ1010×(L/10m)similar-toitalic-ϵsuperscript1010𝐿10m\epsilon\sim 10^{-10}\times(L/10\ \text{m})italic_ϵ ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 10 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × ( italic_L / 10 m ). Note that this is only a parametric estimate. A more detailed study, incorporating additional effects from, e.g., the detailed velocity distribution of pair-produced mCPs or quantum pressure, is left to future work.

VI Discussion

The existence of extremely light millicharged particles has been extensively tested by laboratory, astrophysics, and cosmology based observations. Thus, if such particles exist in nature, their coupling to electromagnetism is constrained to be many orders of magnitude smaller than that of standard charged particles. Regardless, as shown in this work, such particles may still give rise to drastic modifications to electromagnetic observables. In particular, a charged condensate of ultralight bosonic millicharges can quickly develop within microscopic timescales, shorting out long-ranged electric fields on Earth.

We have used this insight to place new bounds on such particles from the successful operation of large electrostatic generators in the lab and the existence of long-ranged electric sources in the atmosphere. If such particles directly couple to the photon, such bounds extend to couplings many orders of magnitude beyond that probed by astrophysics for millicharges lighter than 109eVsimilar-toabsentsuperscript109eV\sim 10^{-9}\ \text{eV}∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT eV.

These limits typically do not apply if the millicharges instead indirectly couple to the visible sector through an ultralight dark photon, since the effect may be suppressed by the small degree of kinetic mixing. However, even in this case, a large density of millicharges is generated, which may be directly detectable with precision electromagnetic detectors. We have discussed a few concrete examples along these lines involving magnetometers and resonant detectors.

In this study, we have implemented order of magnitude estimates when determining the growth time and overall charge of the generated condensate. In future work, it would be interesting to perform more detailed calculations to determine the phase space and spatial profile of these millicharged condensates, incorporating the particular electric field configurations arising from the various sources discussed here.

We also note that analogous Bose condensates may also develop in other theories, such as those incorporating new long-ranged forces coupled to baryon or lepton number. Here, we briefly outline this concept in the case of a new long-ranged U(1)BL𝑈subscript1𝐵𝐿U(1)_{B-L}italic_U ( 1 ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B - italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT force, postponing a more detailed investigation to future work. Static tests of the equivalence principle bound the corresponding coupling to Standard Model currents to be gSM105×(mp/MPl)less-than-or-similar-tosubscript𝑔SMsuperscript105subscript𝑚𝑝subscript𝑀Plg_{{}_{\text{SM}}}\lesssim 10^{-5}\times(m_{p}/M_{\text{Pl}})italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT SM end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT Pl end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), where mpsubscript𝑚𝑝m_{p}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the proton mass and MPlsubscript𝑀PlM_{\text{Pl}}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT Pl end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the Planck mass Wagner et al. (2012); Graham et al. (2016). For couplings saturating these bounds and if the mass of the BL𝐵𝐿B-Litalic_B - italic_L force-carrier is smaller than an inverse Earth radius R11014eVsimilar-tosuperscriptsubscript𝑅direct-sum1superscript1014eVR_{\oplus}^{-1}\sim 10^{-14}\ \text{eV}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊕ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 14 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT eV, the entire Earth contributes to a U(1)BL𝑈subscript1𝐵𝐿U(1)_{B-L}italic_U ( 1 ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B - italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT electric field of strength EBL0.1MV/msimilar-tosubscript𝐸𝐵𝐿0.1MVmE_{B-L}\sim 0.1\ \text{MV}/\text{m}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B - italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 0.1 MV / m. Furthermore, due to the small average velocity of terrestrial atoms, the U(1)BL𝑈subscript1𝐵𝐿U(1)_{B-L}italic_U ( 1 ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B - italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT magnetic field sourced by the Earth is suppressed in comparison, BBLEBLmuch-less-thansubscript𝐵𝐵𝐿subscript𝐸𝐵𝐿B_{B-L}\ll E_{B-L}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B - italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B - italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Thus, if there exist scalar particles χ𝜒\chiitalic_χ directly charged under this new gauge symmetry with, e.g., mass mχR11014eVless-than-or-similar-tosubscript𝑚𝜒superscriptsubscript𝑅direct-sum1similar-tosuperscript1014eVm_{\chi}\lesssim R_{\oplus}^{-1}\sim 10^{-14}\ \text{eV}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊕ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 14 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT eV and coupling gχ(EBLR2)11026greater-than-or-equivalent-tosubscript𝑔𝜒superscriptsubscript𝐸𝐵𝐿superscriptsubscript𝑅direct-sum21similar-tosuperscript1026g_{\chi}\gtrsim(E_{B-L}\,R_{\oplus}^{2})^{-1}\sim 10^{-26}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≳ ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B - italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊕ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 26 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, then a U(1)BL𝑈subscript1𝐵𝐿U(1)_{B-L}italic_U ( 1 ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B - italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT condensate quickly develops at an e𝑒eitalic_e-fold rate of Γχ100Hzsimilar-tosubscriptΓ𝜒100Hz\Gamma_{\chi}\sim 100\ \text{Hz}roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 100 Hz, shorting out Earth’s field to a subcritical value EBLmax(BBL,mχ2/gχ)less-than-or-similar-tosubscript𝐸𝐵𝐿subscript𝐵𝐵𝐿superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜒2subscript𝑔𝜒E_{B-L}\lesssim\max(B_{B-L}\,,\,m_{\chi}^{2}/g_{\chi})italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B - italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ roman_max ( italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B - italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ). This potentially has important implications for laboratory tests of new forces, which will be investigated in future work.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Masha Baryakhtar, Paddy Fox, Anson Hook, and Davide Racco for useful conversations, as well as Cristina Mondino, Katelin Schutz, and Ken Van Tilburg for valuable collaboration on ongoing related work. Fermilab is operated by the Fermi Research Alliance, LLC under Contract DE-AC02-07CH11359 with the U.S. Department of Energy. This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, National Quantum Information Science Research Centers, Superconducting Quantum Materials and Systems Center (SQMS) under contract number DE-AC02-07CH11359. This work was completed in part at the Perimeter Institute. Research at Perimeter Institute is supported in part by the Government of Canada through the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada and by the Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Colleges and Universities. Y.-Y. L is supported by the NSF of China through Grant No. 12305107, 12247103.

References