Progress toward a zero-magnetic-field environment for ultracold-atom experiments
Abstract
The minimization of the magnetic field plays a crucial role in ultracold gas research. For instance, the contact interaction dominates all the other energy scales in the zero magnetic field limit, giving rise to novel quantum phases of matter. However, lowering magnetic fields well below the mG level is often challenging in ultracold gas experiments. In this article, we apply Landau-Zener spectroscopy to characterize and reduce the magnetic field on an ultracold gas of sodium atoms to a few tens of G. The lowest magnetic field achieved here opens the way to observing novel phases of matter with ultracold spinor Bose gases.
I INTRODUCTION
Controlling magnetic fields is critical in many contexts involving fundamental and applied physics experiments and quantum technologies. Often, the performance of a measurement critically depends on the stability against fluctuations of the background magnetic field, as it happens in electron microscopy experiments [1, 2, 3], atom interferometry [4], nuclear magnetic resonance [5], atomic clock experiments [6, 7, 8], and ultracold gases experiments involving coherently-coupled condensate mixtures [9, 10].
In other contexts, such as zero-field nuclear magnetic resonance [11, 12], the constraint relates to the magnitude of the magnetic field, which generally should be minimized and, depending on the type of measurement, needs to be kept below the threshold values. Historically, the measurement of relatively small magnetic fields is achieved using SQUIDs in a cryogenic environment [13], exploiting atomic coherence in room temperature gas cells [14, 15, 16], or atomic spin-alignment [17], with applications in diverse fields, including biomedical imaging [18, 19], metal detection [20, 21], and material characterization [22]. Nowadays, a wide variety of experimental platforms and techniques are available, as described, for instance, in Ref. [23]. In the context of magnetometry, cold gases have been consistently employed as magnetic field sensors [24, 25], in various cases with micrometric scale spatial resolution [26, 27, 28, 29, 30] exploiting the enhanced sensitivity of spinor condensates to magnetic field inhomogeneities [31].
Finding a way to reduce the magnetic field, control it with high accuracy, and be able to measure such small values would pave the way for the investigation of new physical phenomena, such as the zero-magnetic-field physics of spinor condensates, i.e., condensates with a vector order parameter. Spinor condensates can develop different configurations, and their ground state depends on the strength of the interactions between the internal states and on the strength of the externally applied magnetic field, which removes the degeneracy between different spin states [32]. In the majority of the experiments, the magnetic field is typically large enough that the corresponding magnetic energy splitting between spin states dominates over the spin-dependent interaction energy. In such an experimental configuration, spinorial systems with a nonzero and fixed magnetization can be investigated [33]. The complementary case where the magnetization is set to zero and evolves in the absence of an external magnetic field is also very interesting and yet unexplored, and this work aims at creating the conditions to investigate it experimentally.
A regime where the two energies are comparable has been studied with dipolar chromium gases in the presence of magnetic fields of a few tenths of a mG, thanks to the large magnetic moment of chromium atoms [34].
In ultracold gases of alkali atoms, the contribution of the long-range magnetic dipole interaction is typically small [35], which makes the spin-dependent interaction dominated by the spin-dependent contact interactions. This further reduces the threshold magnetic field below which interesting and unobserved spinor phases are expected with respect to the chromium case [32, 36, 37, 38, 39]. Reducing the amplitude of the magnetic field may allow, for instance, for the observation of fragmentation in sodium condensates without manipulating the energy levels to establish the degeneracy among the Zeeman sublevels [39]. Besides, it is also relevant in the context of dipolar magnetic gases where the magnetic interaction becomes crucial and interesting phenomena can develop such as spontaneous circulation [40].
The strength of the magnetic field below which these novel phases appear is known, in the case of the zero spatial mode approximation [37, 38, 39], to be on the order of a few hundreds of G. However, this threshold is expected at even lower magnetic fields in the case of spatially extended condensates. Here, the experimental challenge relies on the difficulty of controlling the magnetic field stability at the G level and reaching and maintaining such small magnetic field values over the whole extension of the atomic sample both during a single experimental sequence and within different runs.
This work presents an experimental technique for minimizing the magnetic field at the 10-G level. Since it is technically difficult to integrate an external device in the vacuum chamber of ultracold atom experiments to characterize and minimize the field, developing an independent technique for the magnetic field characterization using the trapped atoms as sensors becomes necessary. In particular, we describe an application of Landau-Zener (LZ) spectroscopy [41] over an atomic gas of sodium. Reaching such a low field is possible thanks to the presence of a magnetic shield [42], which demonstrated its efficiency in stabilizing the field in several previous works [43, 44, 45, 46]. The results presented in the following open the way to studying the zero-magnetic-field ground state of an =1 system.
II Experimental platform
The experimental platform consists of a bosonic gas of 23Na atoms, trapped in the elongated optical trap potential generated by a single far-detuned infrared (1064 nm) laser beam, and therefore equal for all spin components. A thermal sample is loaded in the optical trap and presents a Gaussian spatial density distribution in all three directions. In the optical trap ( Hz, kHz,), the cloud has an elongated shape with a 1:100 aspect ratio, having the long axis along and the short axes along and .
The sample is prepared inside a magnetic shield, which guarantees the stability of the magnetic field at the level [47, 42]. Pairs of magnetic coils inside the innermost layer of the magnetic shield allow for the application of controllable magnetic fields in each of the three spatial directions. Figure 1 schematically represents the apparatus and shows the glass cell, coils, and magnetic shield. The applied magnetic field’s stability is ensured using high-stability current supplies [Stanford research system (SRS) LDC501 for the longitudinal field and Delta Elektronica ES 015-10 with 10:1 current dividers for transverse fields]. Ramping from positive to negative values of the longitudinal field within the same experimental run is achieved using two unipolar current supplies with opposite orientations arranged in parallel. A master SRS is set to the steady drive of 100 mA ( 245 mG), while a second SRS introduces a tunable current in the opposite direction.
III Measurement scheme
Spectroscopic methods are typical solutions to measure a magnetic field. They consist of interrogating an atomic two-level system with constant radiation at different frequencies for a given time and recording the resulting energy spectrum. In such measurements, the Fourier broadening does not represent a limitation at high magnetic fields when the Zeeman splitting ( kHz/G for atomic 23Na) is much larger than the resonance linewidth. Conversely, when approaching the G regime, techniques such as radio-frequency spectroscopy are difficult to apply, given the unresolved Zeeman structure, and the difficulty of defining the polarization of the radio-frequency or microwave coupling fields.
An alternative method to characterize the magnetic field around the null value relies on ramps of the magnetic field amplitude and directions, taking advantage of the adiabatic/diabatic dynamics of the atomic spin rotation. At low magnetic field, i.e., when the Larmor frequency is of the order or lower than the velocity of rotation of the magnetic field direction, LZ theory [48, 49, 50] applies, resulting in a powerful tool for the magnetic field characterization.
We developed two protocols based on LZ sweeps on the (taken as a quantization axis) component of the field. The first one aims to minimize the magnetic field in the transverse plane and is implemented by ramping (or sweeping) the field component from positive to negative finite values. The second protocol involves a ramp with a variable endpoint to find the minimum field along .
In the following, we will use the magnetic field nomenclature presented in Tab. 1.
Magnetic field modulus | |
() | Actual magnetic field components |
Transverse field | |
Longitudinal field | |
Field induced by the coil | |
Starting of the LZ ramps | |
Optimal from fit | |
Field set during condensation | |
Final value of longitudinal field protocol |
III.1 Energy levels and Landau-Zener theory
The hyperfine ground state of sodium has a total angular momentum with three magnetic sublevels defined as the projection of along the -axis. The energy of the three states can be estimated with high accuracy using the Breit-Rabi formula [51] once the magnetic field value is known, and, in the small field limit, a linear dependence on the field (first order Zeeman regime) is expected. Let us consider as the quantization axis and the magnetic field with a finite transverse component . If is linearly ramped with a slope , from large positive to large negative values passing across zero, the energy of the states as a function of time is the one shown in Fig. 2. At , the magnetic field is equal to , which introduces an avoided crossing between the states.
The time-dependent Hamiltonian of the system for the wavefunction reads, as in [52, 41],
(1) |
where is the Landé factor, is the Bohr magneton, and acts as a coupling between the states and defines the gap in the energy levels shown in \IfBeginWithfig:fig1eq:Eq. (1)\IfBeginWithfig:fig1fig:Fig. 1\IfBeginWithfig:fig1tab:Table 1\IfBeginWithfig:fig1appendix:Appendix 1\IfBeginWithfig:fig1sec:Section 1. Here is defined as the instant when . The parameter originates from the time derivative of the Larmor frequency at the energy levels crossing
(2) |
which relates the ramps with the variation of the Larmor precession of the atoms around the applied magnetic field.
While the atoms are initially prepared in the state at large (as compared to ) and positive values of , ramping in time may induce the transfer to different states according to the analytical model discussed in [41]. In the following, we apply the results of [52] as we measure the population distribution at long times after the inversion of :
(3) | ||||
(4) | ||||
(5) |
with
(6) |
being the LZ transfer probability. From Eq. (3) and Eq. (6), one finds that a complete diabatic transfer of the population from the to the state takes place when (large ramp speed or small gap ), while adiabaticity is preserved for small and large . This results from implementing the adiabatic condition to the spin dynamics in a rotating magnetic field. In other words, adiabaticity is fulfilled when the variation of the magnetic field direction is smaller than the Larmor frequency, i.e., . For instance, the probability of the transition to has a Gaussian distribution with RMS width
(7) |
which is the width used in the following.
III.2 Experimental protocols
III.2.1 Transverse field minimization
The goal is to find the optimal current values for each coil to compensate for the residual transverse magnetic field (which is not screened by the magnetic shield or due to the shield’s permanent magnetization).
The protocol to minimize the transverse field amplitude starts with a thermal atomic sample by setting the values of the currents in the coils for the transverse directions, generating the fields and . In the following, we discuss the two experimental schemes depicted in \IfBeginWithfig:fig3eq:Eq. (3)\IfBeginWithfig:fig3fig:Fig. 3\IfBeginWithfig:fig3tab:Table 3\IfBeginWithfig:fig3appendix:Appendix 3\IfBeginWithfig:fig3sec:Section 3.
Scheme A (red line) consists in changing from to with a linear ramp of variable duration . After this first ramp, is reduced to mG in 50 ms. Then, the sample is evaporatively cooled to Bose condensation by reducing the dipole trapping beam intensity. To image the spin state, after switching off the trapping potential, a vertical magnetic field gradient of 8 G/cm is applied to separate the three states in a Stern-Gerlach-like scheme. A simultaneous absorption image of the three states is made after a time-of-flight of 18 ms. Bose condensing the sample before imaging favors the spatial spin resolution of the Stern-Gerlach imaging, given the relatively small amount of the applied magnetic field gradient and ballistic expansion time.
To reduce the sensitivity to magnetic field inhomogeneities using an atomic sample with reduced spatial extension, in Scheme B (blue line) the order between LZ ramp and evaporation is reversed. The atomic sample is first cooled below the critical temperature for condensation at 130 mG, and then the field is decreased to to apply the LZ ramp from to . By doing so, the spatial extent of the condensed atomic sample is considerably smaller during the LZ ramp, suppressing the contributions from the magnetic field’s spatial inhomogeneities.
The ramp duration should be much longer than the coils time constant 0.5 ms, where and are the inductance and the resistance of the coils, respectively, and much shorter than the sample lifetime in the trap ( 1 s, 1 s). The value was chosen depending on the ramp duration, from a maximum of 1.5 mG to a minimum of 750 G, with ranging from a maximum of 3 G/s to a minimum of 3.75 mG/s.
The values and that best compensate for the residual transverse field are the ones giving the maximal transfer to the state. They are found through an iterative procedure, as sketched in \IfBeginWithfig:fig4eq:Eq. (4)\IfBeginWithfig:fig4fig:Fig. 4\IfBeginWithfig:fig4tab:Table 4\IfBeginWithfig:fig4appendix:Appendix 4\IfBeginWithfig:fig4sec:Section 4a. The first iteration is a scan in setting mG/s and . We obtain the value for which we observe maximum transfer in . Then, we set and we perform a scan in obtaining for which we have the maximal transfer of the population in the state . We repeat this procedure by slowing down the ramp in at each iteration. In this way, the distribution shrinks, increasing our sensitivity to determine the field value that best compensates for the residual one. The first iteration starts finding the value with a scan in at fixed , with a given ramp speed mG/s. Then, at fixed we perform a scan in obtaining .
Figure 4b presents the three hyperfine relative populations, , , , for three subsequent scans of the magnetic field , with decreasing value of and set to the value determined in the previous iteration step. The experimental data were fitted to Eq. (3-5) from which we extract the center , the maximum transfer , and the width of the transfer peak. At first, the center of the observed structures corresponds to and this allows us to determine to compensate any residual field along . The residual field in depends on the maximum in the transferred population as
(8) |
which is minimized after each scan (scan in are not shown in figure). As expected, slower ramps lead to smaller (as highlighted by the white windows, which always mark a region of 200 G), and consequently to increase the precision at which (and ) is determined.
III.2.2 Longitudinal field
The protocol presented in the previous section allows for minimizing the transverse magnetic field. The best-obtained values are then used as transverse fields setting and for the characterization of the residual longitudinal field .
Here, we introduce the procedure to characterize the residual longitudinal field . The gas is first evaporated to obtain a BEC at mG, then is ramped from a positive value down to a variable one with constant ramp G/s. As the Stern-Gerlach imaging is implemented at positive , we constrain the diabatic spin dynamics to the decreasing ramp on by raising the transverse field to a finite value after the end of the ramp, see Fig. 5. If , the LZ transfer does not take place since the ramp is interrupted before the zero crossing on hence leaving the atoms in . If , on the other hand, the transfer to takes place. An example of such a scan is given in Fig. 6 where the relative populations in the three states are represented as a function of the value . We verified that using a slower ramp does not affect the experimental result. The line in the plot is a fit based on the time dependent model reported in Ref.[41]. The extracted central position allows to determine . Note that the typical oscillations of the LZ process are not visible here due to the large population transfer, which suppresses interference process between different states.
IV RESULTS
From the fits of the experimental data, as the examples shown in Fig. 4, it is possible to extract both the width of the transfer peak and, from the contrast of the LZ population transfer, the residual transverse magnetic field . Figure 7a shows the measured width of the transfer peak as a function of for both protocols (red symbols for A and blue for B). Each point was obtained by averaging the widths from different experimental runs with the same ramp speed. The experimental values of the width are consistent with predicted from the LZ theory (dashed line in the figure).
For instance, the flattening behavior observed in Fig.7 around G, and G, both for thermal and condensed samples, suggests the possible role of magnetic field inhomogeneities, in particular along the long axis of the condensate. We add a magnetic field gradient along the axial direction of the sample to further reduce and , as shown by the filled dots in \IfBeginWithfig:fig7eq:Eq. (7)\IfBeginWithfig:fig7fig:Fig. 7\IfBeginWithfig:fig7tab:Table 7\IfBeginWithfig:fig7appendix:Appendix 7\IfBeginWithfig:fig7sec:Section 7a and \IfBeginWithfig:fig7eq:Eq. (7)\IfBeginWithfig:fig7fig:Fig. 7\IfBeginWithfig:fig7tab:Table 7\IfBeginWithfig:fig7appendix:Appendix 7\IfBeginWithfig:fig7sec:Section 7b.
From the maximum transmission probability obtained from the different scans, we can calculate by using Eq. (8) both for measurements without (empty symbols) and with (filled triangles) the gradient compensation, as shown in \IfBeginWithfig:fig7eq:Eq. (7)\IfBeginWithfig:fig7fig:Fig. 7\IfBeginWithfig:fig7tab:Table 7\IfBeginWithfig:fig7appendix:Appendix 7\IfBeginWithfig:fig7sec:Section 7b. The smallest width observed allows us to determine the minimal residual transverse field at G, a value that could be limited by the noise of the current supplies driving the compensation coils. Also, it is worth mentioning that the condition for the residual field compensation has generally been stable for several weeks. Still, we did observe jumps in the compensation field at the level of hundreds of G (a few events over six months of measurements), which we could not clearly attribute to technical circumstances.
The longitudinal field was minimized by following the protocol explained in Sec. III.2.2. is chosen as the center of the time-dependent model fitted to the data shown in Fig. 6, G.
By combining the minimal transverse and longitudinal field results, we estimate we can reach a minimal field modulus of G, which complies with the conditions for observing a nematic phase in an elongated 23Na condensate.
V CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK
In this paper, we present a technique to characterize and compensate magnetic fields at the level of 10 G in experiments with ultracold atomic gases. The method is based on monitoring the Zeeman populations in diabatic atomic spin rotation. The simulations based on the LZ dynamics for a three-level system reproduced the experimental data well. These results pave the way to studying the unexplored scenario of condensation in zero magnetic fields in extended spinor gases, when spin interactions may become dominant over all other contributions to the Hamiltonian.
For instance, the ground state of an F=1 spinor condensate, characterized by antiferromagnetic interactions, develops an order parameter with a nematic character, as observed in the single spatial mode approximation [37, 38], but its superfluid properties were not explored so far.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge funding from Provincia Autonoma di Trento, from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation Programme through the STAQS project of QuantERA II (Grant Agreements No. 101017733) and from the European Union - Next Generation EU through PNRR MUR project PE0000023-NQSTI. The work was also supported by the project DYNAMITE QUANTERA2-00056, funded by the Ministry of University and Research through the ERANET COFUND QuantERA II – 2021 call and co-funded by the European Union (Grant Agreements No. 101017733). This work was supported by Q@TN, the joint lab between the University of Trento, FBK - Fondazione Bruno Kessler, INFN - National Institute for Nuclear Physics and CNR - National Research Council.
References
- Mulvey [1962] T. Mulvey, Origins and historical development of the electron microscope, British Journal of Applied Physics 13, 197 (1962).
- Ruska [1987] E. Ruska, The development of the electron microscope and of electron microscopy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 627 (1987).
- Krivanek et al. [2008] O. Krivanek, G. Corbin, N. Dellby, B. Elston, R. Keyse, M. F. Murfitt, C. Own, Z. Szilagyi, and J. Woodruff, An electron microscope for the aberration-corrected era, Ultramicroscopy 108, 179 (2008).
- [4] E. Rasel, W. Schleich, and S. Wölk, eds., Atom interferometry and its applications (IOS, Amsterdam; SIF, Bologna 2019) pp. 345–392, Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, Course CXCVII, Varenna, 8-13 July 2016.
- Mansfield and Chapman [1987] P. Mansfield and B. Chapman, Multishield active magnetic screening of coil structures in NMR, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 72, 211 (1987).
- Clairon et al. [1991] A. Clairon, C. Salomon, S. Guellati, and W. D. Phillips, Ramsey resonance in a zacharias fountain, Europhysics Letters 16, 165 (1991).
- Gibble and Chu [1993] K. Gibble and S. Chu, Laser-cooled cs frequency standard and a measurement of the frequency shift due to ultracold collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1771 (1993).
- Ludlow et al. [2015] A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637 (2015).
- Nicklas et al. [2015] E. Nicklas, M. Karl, M. Höfer, A. Johnson, W. Muessel, H. Strobel, J. Tomkovič, T. Gasenzer, and M. K. Oberthaler, Observation of scaling in the dynamics of a strongly quenched quantum gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 245301 (2015).
- Cominotti et al. [2024] R. Cominotti, C. Rogora, A. Zenesini, G. Lamporesi, and G. Ferrari, Ultracold atomic spin mixtures in ultrastable magnetic field environments, Europhysics Letters 146, 45001 (2024).
- Ledbetter et al. [2008] M. P. Ledbetter, I. M. Savukov, D. Budker, V. Shah, S. Knappe, J. Kitching, D. J. Michalak, S. Xu, and A. Pines, Zero-field remote detection of nmr with a microfabricated atomic magnetometer, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 2286 (2008).
- Tayler et al. [2017] M. C. D. Tayler, T. Theis, T. F. Sjolander, J. W. Blanchard, A. Kentner, S. Pustelny, A. Pines, and D. Budker, Invited Review Article: Instrumentation for nuclear magnetic resonance in zero and ultralow magnetic field, Review of Scientific Instruments 88, 091101 (2017).
- Romani et al. [1982] G. L. Romani, S. J. Williamson, and L. Kaufman, Biomagnetic instrumentation, Review of Scientific Instruments 53, 1815 (1982).
- Dupont-Roc et al. [1969] J. Dupont-Roc, S. Haroche, and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Detection of very weak magnetic fields () by zero-field level crossing resonances, Physics Letters A 28, 638 (1969).
- Budker et al. [2002] D. Budker, W. Gawlik, D. F. Kimball, S. M. Rochester, V. V. Yashchuk, and A. Weis, Resonant nonlinear magneto-optical effects in atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 1153 (2002).
- Budker and Romalis [2007] D. Budker and M. Romalis, Optical magnetometry, Nature Physics 3, 227 (2007).
- Meraki et al. [2023] A. Meraki, L. Elson, N. Ho, A. Akbar, M. Koźbiał, J. Kołodyński, and K. Jensen, Zero-field optical magnetometer based on spin alignment, Phys. Rev. A 108, 062610 (2023).
- Brookes et al. [2022] M. Brookes, J. Leggett, M. Rea, R. Hill, N. Holmes, E. Boto, and R. Bowtell, Magnetoencephalography with optically pumped magnetometers (OPM-MEG): the next generation of functional neuroimaging, Trends Neuroscience 8, 621 (2022).
- Sander et al. [2012] T. Sander, J. Preusser, R. Mhaskar, J. Kitching, L. Trahms, and S. Knappe, Magnetoencephalography with a chip-scale atomic magnetometer, Biomed Opt Express 3, 981 (2012).
- Bevington et al. [2019] P. Bevington, R. Gartman, and W. Chalupczak, Enhanced material defect imaging with a radio-frequency atomic magnetometer, Journal of Applied Physics 125, 094503 (2019).
- Rushton et al. [2022] L. Rushton, T. Pyragius, A. Meraki, L. Elson, and K. Jensen, Unshielded portable optically pumped magnetometer for the remote detection of conductive objects using eddy current measurements, Review of Scientific Instruments 93, 125103 (2022).
- Romalis and Dang [2011] M. V. Romalis and H. B. Dang, Atomic magnetometers for materials characterization, Materials Today 14, 258 (2011).
- Mitchell and Palacios Alvarez [2020] M. W. Mitchell and S. Palacios Alvarez, Colloquium: Quantum limits to the energy resolution of magnetic field sensors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 021001 (2020).
- Isayama et al. [1999] T. Isayama, Y. Takahashi, N. Tanaka, K. Toyoda, K. Ishikawa, and T. Yabuzaki, Observation of larmor spin precession of laser-cooled rb atoms via paramagnetic faraday rotation, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4836 (1999).
- Cohen et al. [2019] Y. Cohen, K. Jadeja, S. Sula, M. Venturelli, C. Deans, L. Marmugi, and F. Renzoni, A cold atom radio-frequency magnetometer, Applied Physics Letters 114, 073505 (2019).
- Higbie et al. [2005] J. M. Higbie, L. E. Sadler, S. Inouye, A. P. Chikkatur, S. R. Leslie, K. L. Moore, V. Savalli, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Direct nondestructive imaging of magnetization in a spin-1 bose-einstein gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 050401 (2005).
- Wildermuth et al. [2006] S. Wildermuth, S. Hofferberth, I. Lesanovsky, S. Groth, P. Krüger, J. Schmiedmayer, and I. Bar-Joseph, Sensing electric and magnetic fields with Bose-Einstein condensates, Applied Physics Letters 88, 264103 (2006).
- Vengalattore et al. [2007] M. Vengalattore, J. M. Higbie, S. R. Leslie, J. Guzman, L. E. Sadler, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, High-resolution magnetometry with a spinor bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 200801 (2007).
- Elíasson et al. [2019] O. Elíasson, R. Heck, J. S. Laustsen, M. Napolitano, R. Müller, M. G. Bason, J. J. Arlt, and J. F. Sherson, Spatially-selective in situ magnetometry of ultracold atomic clouds, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 52, 075003 (2019).
- Yang et al. [2020] F. Yang, S. F. Taylor, S. D. Edkins, J. C. Palmstrom, I. R. Fisher, and B. L. Lev, Nematic transitions in iron pnictide superconductors imaged with a quantum gas, Nature Physics 16, 514 (2020).
- Witkowski et al. [2013] M. Witkowski, R. Gartman, B. Nagórny, M. Piotrowski, M. Płodzień, K. Sacha, J. Szczepkowski, J. Zachorowski, M. Zawada, and W. Gawlik, Matter-wave interference versus spontaneous pattern formation in spinor bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 88, 025602 (2013).
- Stamper-Kurn and Ueda [2013] D. M. Stamper-Kurn and M. Ueda, Spinor Bose gases: Symmetries, magnetism, and quantum dynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1191 (2013).
- Chomaz et al. [2022] L. Chomaz, I. Ferrier-Barbut, F. Ferlaino, B. Laburthe-Tolra, B. L. Lev, and T. Pfau, Dipolar physics: a review of experiments with magnetic quantum gases, Reports on Progress in Physics 86, 026401 (2022).
- Pasquiou et al. [2011] B. Pasquiou, E. Maréchal, G. Bismut, P. Pedri, L. Vernac, O. Gorceix, and B. Laburthe-Tolra, Spontaneous Demagnetization of a Dipolar Spinor Bose Gas in an Ultralow Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 255303 (2011).
- Fattori et al. [2008] M. Fattori, G. Roati, B. Deissler, C. D’Errico, M. Zaccanti, M. Jona-Lasinio, L. Santos, M. Inguscio, and G. Modugno, Magnetic dipolar interaction in a bose-einstein condensate atomic interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 190405 (2008).
- Jiménez-García et al. [2019] K. Jiménez-García, A. Invernizzi, B. Evrard, C. Frapolli, J. Dalibard, and F. Gerbier, Spontaneous formation and relaxation of spin domains in antiferromagnetic spin-1 condensates, Nature Communication 10, 1422 (2019).
- Hamley et al. [2012] C. D. Hamley, C. S. Gerving, T. M. Hoang, E. M. Bookjans, and M. S. Chapman, Spin-nematic squeezed vacuum in a quantum gas, Nature Physics 8, 305 (2012).
- Zibold et al. [2016] T. Zibold, V. Corre, C. Frapolli, A. Invernizzi, J. Dalibard, and F. Gerbier, Spin-nematic order in antiferromagnetic spinor condensates, Phys. Rev. A 93, 023614 (2016).
- Evrard et al. [2021] B. Evrard, A. Qu, J. Dalibard, and F. Gerbier, Observation of fragmentation of a spinor bose-einstein condensate, Science 373, 1340 (2021).
- Kawaguchi et al. [2006] Y. Kawaguchi, H. Saito, and M. Ueda, Spontaneous circulation in ground-state spinor dipolar bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 130404 (2006).
- Band and Avishai [2019] Y. B. Band and Y. Avishai, Three-level Landau-Zener dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 99, 032112 (2019).
- Farolfi et al. [2019] A. Farolfi, D. Trypogeorgos, G. Colzi, E. Fava, G. Lamporesi, and G. Ferrari, Design and characterization of a compact magnetic shield for ultracold atomic gas experiments, Review of Scientific Instruments 90, 115114 (2019).
- Farolfi et al. [2021a] A. Farolfi, A. Zenesini, D. Trypogeorgos, C. Mordini, A. Gallemí, A. Roy, A. Recati, G. Lamporesi, and G. Ferrari, Quantum-torque-induced breaking of magnetic interfaces in ultracold gases, Nat. Phys. 17, 1359 (2021a).
- Farolfi et al. [2021b] A. Farolfi, A. Zenesini, R. Cominotti, D. Trypogeorgos, A. Recati, G. Lamporesi, and G. Ferrari, Manipulation of an elongated internal Josephson junction of bosonic atoms, Phys. Rev. A 104, 023326 (2021b).
- Cominotti et al. [2023] R. Cominotti, A. Berti, C. Dulin, C. Rogora, G. Lamporesi, I. Carusotto, A. Recati, A. Zenesini, and G. Ferrari, Ferromagnetism in an Extended Coherently Coupled Atomic Superfluid, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021037 (2023).
- Zenesini et al. [2024] A. Zenesini, A. Berti, R. Cominotti, C. Rogora, I. G. Moss, T. P. Billam, I. Carusotto, G. Lamporesi, A. Recati, and G. Ferrari, False vacuum decay via bubble formation in ferromagnetic superfluids, Nature Physics 20, 558 (2024).
- Colzi et al. [2018] G. Colzi, E. Fava, M. Barbiero, C. Mordini, G. Lamporesi, and G. Ferrari, Production of large Bose-Einstein condensates in a magnetic-shield-compatible hybrid trap, Phys. Rev. A 97, 053625 (2018).
- Landau [1932] L. Landau, Zur theorie der energieubertragung ii, Zeitschrift fur Physik (Sowjetunion) 2, 46 (1932).
- Zener [1932] C. Zener, Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A137, 696–702 (1932).
- Kofman et al. [2023] P. O. Kofman, O. V. Ivakhnenko, S. N. Shevchenko, and F. Nori, Majorana’s approach to nonadiabatic transitions validates the adiabatic-impulse approximation, Scientific Reports 13, 5053 (2023).
- Breit and Rabi [1931] G. Breit and I. I. Rabi, Measurement of nuclear spin, Phys. Rev. 38, 2082 (1931).
- Carroll and Hioe [1986] C. E. Carroll and F. T. Hioe, Transition probabilities for the three-level landau-zener model, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 19, 2061 (1986).