Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

A simple model of magnetic universe without singularity associated
with a quadratic equation of state

Pierre-Henri Chavanis Laboratoire de Physique Théorique, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, France
Abstract

A model of magnetic universe based on nonlinear electrodynamics has been introduced by Kruglov [Phys. Rev. D 92, 123523 (2015)]. This model describes an early inflation era followed by a radiation era. We show that this model is related to the model of universe based on a quadratic equation of state introduced in our previous paper [P.H. Chavanis, Universe 1, 357 (2015)]. This correspondance may provide a more fundamental justification of our equation of state. It may arise from quantum corrections to linear electrodynamics when the electromagnetic field becomes very high. We discuss two quantitatively different models of early universe. In Model I, the primordial density of the universe is identified with the Planck density. At t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0, the universe had the characteristics of a Planck black hole (“planckion” particle). During the inflation, which takes place on a Planck timescale, the size of the universe evolves from the Planck length to a size comparable to the Compton wavelength of the neutrino. If we interpret the radius of the universe at the end of the inflation (neutrino’s Compton wavelength) as a minimum length related to quantum gravity and use Zeldovich’s first formula of the vacuum energy, we obtain the correct value of the cosmological constant. In Model II, the primordial density of the universe is identified with the electron density as a consequence of nonlinear electrodynamics. At t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0, the universe had the characteristics of an electron. This can be viewed as a refinement of the “primeval atom” of Lemaître. During the inflation, which takes place on a gravitoelectronic timescale, the size of the universe evolves from the electron’s classical radius to a size comparable to the size of a dark energy star of the stellar mass. If we interpret the radius of the universe at the begining of the inflation (electron’s classical radius) as a minimum length related to quantum gravity and use Zeldovich’s second formula of the vacuum energy, we obtain the correct value of the cosmological constant. This provides an accurate form of Eddington’s relation between the cosmological constant and the mass of the electron. We use these arguments to show that the present universe contains about 1080superscript108010^{80}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 80 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT protons (Eddington’s number). We also introduce a nonlinear electromagnetic Lagrangian that describes simultaneously the early inflation, the radiation era, and the dark energy era. It may account for a form of “generalized radiation” that is present from the begining to the end of the cosmic evolution. Baryonic and dark matter are treated as independent noninteracting species. The dark energy era is due to the electromagnetic vacuum energy (zero-point radiation). In this approach, both the early inflation and the late acceleration of the universe (dark energy) arise as a consequence of nonlinear electrodynamics. This leads to a simple model of magnetic universe without singularity (aioniotic universe).

I Introduction

In a series of papers chavanisAIP ; jgrav ; cosmopoly1 ; cosmopoly2 ; cosmopoly3 ; universe ; stiff ; mlbec ; chavanisIOP ; vacuumon , we have developed a simple model of universe based on a generalized equation of state of the form

P/c2=αρ+kρ1+1/n,𝑃superscript𝑐2𝛼𝜌𝑘superscript𝜌11𝑛P/c^{2}=\alpha\rho+k\rho^{1+1/n},italic_P / italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_α italic_ρ + italic_k italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + 1 / italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (1)

where P𝑃Pitalic_P is the pressure and ρc2𝜌superscript𝑐2\rho c^{2}italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the energy density. This is the sum of a linear equation of state and a polytropic equation of state. When n>0𝑛0n>0italic_n > 0 this equation of state describes the early universe. When k<0𝑘0k<0italic_k < 0 the energy density interpolates between a phase of primordial inflation (de Sitter) where the scale factor increases exponentially rapidly with time and an α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-era where the scale factor increases algebraically. For α=1/3𝛼13\alpha=1/3italic_α = 1 / 3, this period corresponds to the radiation era. When n<0𝑛0n<0italic_n < 0 this equation of state describes the late universe. When k<0𝑘0k<0italic_k < 0 the energy density interpolates between an α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-era where the scale factor increases algebraically with time and a phase of late acceleration (de Sitter) where the scale factor increases exponentially rapidly.111The case k>0𝑘0k>0italic_k > 0 has been treated in cosmopoly1 ; cosmopoly2 and leads to singular or peculiar models of universe that we do not consider here. The case of a phantom evolution where the density of the universe increases as the universe expands has been treated in cosmopoly3 . We do not consider this case here neither.

We have also introduced the quadratic equation of state chavanisAIP ; jgrav ; cosmopoly1 ; cosmopoly2 ; cosmopoly3 ; universe ; stiff ; mlbec ; chavanisIOP ; vacuumon

P=(α+1)ρ2ρPc2+αρc2(α+1)ρΛc2,𝑃𝛼1superscript𝜌2subscript𝜌𝑃superscript𝑐2𝛼𝜌superscript𝑐2𝛼1subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P=-(\alpha+1)\frac{\rho^{2}}{\rho_{P}}c^{2}+\alpha\rho c^{2}-(\alpha+1)\rho_{% \Lambda}c^{2},italic_P = - ( italic_α + 1 ) divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_α italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_α + 1 ) italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (2)

which provides a simple model of nonsingular universe presenting an early inflation, an α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-era, and a late acceleration (dark energy era). The density starts at early times with the Planck density ρP=c5/G2=5.16×1099gm3subscript𝜌𝑃superscript𝑐5superscript𝐺2Planck-constant-over-2-pi5.16superscript1099gsuperscriptm3\rho_{P}=c^{5}/G^{2}\hbar=5.16\times 10^{99}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ = 5.16 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 99 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, decreases during the α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-era, and tends to the cosmological density ρΛ=Λc2/8πG=5.96×1024gm3subscript𝜌ΛΛsuperscript𝑐28𝜋𝐺5.96superscript1024gsuperscriptm3\rho_{\Lambda}=\Lambda c^{2}/8\pi G=5.96\times 10^{-24}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_Λ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 8 italic_π italic_G = 5.96 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 24 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT at late times (see Fig. 16 in universe ).222The empirical value of the cosmological constant is Λ=1.11×1052m2Λ1.11superscript1052superscriptm2\Lambda=1.11\times 10^{-52}\,{\rm m^{-2}}roman_Λ = 1.11 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 52 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Accordingly, the universe experiences a first period of exponential acceleration (early inflation), decelerates (when α>1/3𝛼13\alpha>-1/3italic_α > - 1 / 3), and finally experiences a second period of exponential acceleration (late inflation), the one that we observe at present. The two de Sitter eras are bridged by an α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-era. Therefore, this equation of state unifies the inflation in the early universe and the dark energy in the late universe. We argued that the equation of state (2) with α=1/3𝛼13\alpha=1/3italic_α = 1 / 3 describes a form of “generalized radiation”. In order to obtain the complete evolution of the universe we have to introduce, in addition to this generalized radiation, baryonic and dark matter, and possibly other components, treated as independent noninteracting species. The resulting cosmological model turns out to be equivalent to the ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM model except that it replaces the big bang singularity by a non singular (de Sitter) inflation era with a “graceful” exit. A summary of our main results is given in the introduction of vacuumon .

A weakness of our model, however, is that the equation of state (2) is introduced in a rather ad hoc manner, without a “microscopic” derivation. Recently, we came accross the very interesting papers of Kruglov kruglov2015a ; kruglov2015 ; kruglov2020 who introduced a similar model (valid in the early universe) from the viewpoint of “magnetic cosmology” based on nonlinear electrodynamics. Following previous authors novello1 ; novello2 ; cgcl ; novello3 ; vollick ; novello4 ; garcia he argued that electromagnetic fields play an important role in cosmology and that the evolution of the early universe is fueled by a stochastic magnetic field due to plasma fluctuations. In this sense, electromagnetic fields are the source of gravitational fields. When electromagnetic fields are very strong during the early evolution of the universe one must use nonlinear electrodynamics. This may take into account quantum gravity corrections to linear electrodynamics.333In addition, quantum mechanics could be a “classical” process arising from the stochastic fluctuations of the electromagnetic field (zero-point radiation) as suggested by the theory of stochastic electrodynamics pena . The use of nonlinear electrodynamics can remove the big bang singularity. Instead of prescribing an equation of state as we did, Kruglov kruglov2015a ; kruglov2015 ; kruglov2020 (see also ovgun ; benaoum1 ; benaoum2 ) introduced a nonlinear electromagnetic Lagrangian – a sort of generalized Born-Infeld born1933 ; borninfeld Lagrangian – that produces a phase of early inflation followed by a radiation era.444This Lagrangian is also introduced in an ad hoc manner. However, since it is connected to a physical mechanism – nonlinear electrodynamics – this gives the hope to derive this model (or more general ones) from “microscopic” considerations. This is, however, beyond the scope of the present paper. In the present paper, we show that his nonlinear electromagnetic Lagrangian leads precisely to the equation of state (1) introduced in chavanisAIP ; jgrav ; cosmopoly1 ; cosmopoly2 ; cosmopoly3 ; universe ; stiff ; mlbec ; chavanisIOP ; vacuumon . We also consider the inverse problem and explain how one can construct more general electromagnetic Lagrangians by prescribing an equation of state such as Eq. (1). We stress, however, that some electromagnetic constraints reduce the possible type of equations of state and select the indices n=±1𝑛plus-or-minus1n=\pm 1italic_n = ± 1 among the whole polytropic family, leading in a natural manner to Eq. (2).

We discuss two quantitatively different models regarding the early inflation.

In Model I, the density of the primordial universe is identified with the Planck density ρP=5.16×1099gm3subscript𝜌𝑃5.16superscript1099gsuperscriptm3\rho_{P}=5.16\times 10^{99}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5.16 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 99 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (or a fraction of it). During the inflation, which takes place on a Planck timescale tP=5.39×1044ssubscript𝑡𝑃5.39superscript1044st_{P}=5.39\times 10^{-44}\,{\rm s}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5.39 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 44 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s, the size of the universe increases by 30303030 orders of magnitude. It evolves from the Planck length lP=1.62×1035msubscript𝑙𝑃1.62superscript1035ml_{P}=1.62\times 10^{-35}\,{\rm m}italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.62 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 35 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m to a size equal to the Compton wavelength of the neutrino rν=3.91×105msubscript𝑟𝜈3.91superscript105mr_{\nu}=3.91\times 10^{-5}\,{\rm m}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3.91 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m with mass mν=5.04×103eV/c2subscript𝑚𝜈5.04superscript103eVsuperscriptc2m_{\nu}=5.04\times 10^{-3}\,{\rm eV/c^{2}}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5.04 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_eV / roman_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. This creates 1090superscript109010^{90}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 90 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT particles of the Planck mass MP=(c/G)1/2=2.18×105g=1.22×1019GeV/c2subscript𝑀𝑃superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi𝑐𝐺122.18superscript105g1.22superscript1019GeVsuperscriptc2M_{P}=(\hbar c/G)^{1/2}=2.18\times 10^{-5}\,{\rm g}=1.22\times 10^{19}\,{\rm GeV% /c^{2}}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( roman_ℏ italic_c / italic_G ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 2.18 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g = 1.22 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 19 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_GeV / roman_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT during the inflation. This implies that, after the radiation era, the mass of the universe is equal to 1062MPsuperscript1062subscript𝑀𝑃10^{62}M_{P}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 62 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. If we interpret the radius of the universe at the end of the inflation (neutrino’s Compton wavelength) as a minimum length related to quantum gravity in the sense of Amelino-Camelia gacnature and use Zeldovich’s first formula of the vacuum energy zeldovich ; zeldovichA , we obtain the correct value of the cosmological constant ouf :

Λ=Grν4c3=Gcmν43=1.11×1052m2.Λ𝐺Planck-constant-over-2-pisuperscriptsubscript𝑟𝜈4superscript𝑐3𝐺𝑐superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜈4superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi31.11superscript1052superscriptm2\Lambda=\frac{G\hbar}{r_{\nu}^{4}c^{3}}=\frac{Gcm_{\nu}^{4}}{\hbar^{3}}=1.11% \times 10^{-52}\,{\rm m^{-2}}.roman_Λ = divide start_ARG italic_G roman_ℏ end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_G italic_c italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = 1.11 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 52 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (3)

In Model II, the density of the primordial universe is identified with the electron density ρe=4.07×1016gm3subscript𝜌𝑒4.07superscript1016gsuperscriptm3\rho_{e}=4.07\times 10^{16}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4.07 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 16 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as a consequence of nonlinear electrodynamics. During the inflation, which takes place on a gravitoelectronic timescale te=0.0192ssuperscriptsubscript𝑡𝑒0.0192st_{e}^{*}=0.0192\,{\rm s}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.0192 roman_s, the size of the universe increase by 30303030 orders of magnitude. It evolves from the electron’s classical radius re=2.82×1015msubscript𝑟𝑒2.82superscript1015mr_{e}=2.82\times 10^{-15}\,{\rm m}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2.82 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m to a size of the order of the radius R~2=7.07×1015msubscript~𝑅27.07superscript1015m{\tilde{R}}_{2}=7.07\times 10^{15}\,{\rm m}over~ start_ARG italic_R end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 7.07 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m of a dark energy star of the stellar mass. This creates 1090superscript109010^{90}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 90 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT particles of the electron mass me=9.11×1028g=0.511MeV/c2subscript𝑚𝑒9.11superscript1028g0.511MeVsuperscriptc2m_{e}=9.11\times 10^{-28}\,{\rm g}=0.511\,{\rm MeV/c^{2}}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 9.11 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 28 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g = 0.511 roman_MeV / roman_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT during the inflation. This implies that, after the radiation era, the universe is made of 1083superscript108310^{83}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 83 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT electrons or 1080superscript108010^{80}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 80 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT protons (Eddington’s number). If we interpret the radius of the universe at the begining of the inflation (electron’s classical radius) as a minimum length related to quantum gravity in the sense of Karolyhazy karolyhazy and use Zeldovich’s second formula of the vacuum energy zeldovich ; zeldovichA , we obtain the correct value of the cosmological constant ouf :

Λ=G2me6α64=G22re6c6=1.36×1052m2,Λsuperscript𝐺2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑒6superscript𝛼6superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi4superscript𝐺2superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2superscriptsubscript𝑟𝑒6superscript𝑐61.36superscript1052superscriptm2\Lambda=\frac{G^{2}m_{e}^{6}}{\alpha^{6}\hbar^{4}}=\frac{G^{2}\hbar^{2}}{r_{e}% ^{6}c^{6}}=1.36\times 10^{-52}\,{\rm m^{-2}},roman_Λ = divide start_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = 1.36 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 52 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (4)

where α=e2/(c)1/137𝛼superscript𝑒2Planck-constant-over-2-pi𝑐similar-to-or-equals1137\alpha=e^{2}/(\hbar c)\simeq 1/137italic_α = italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / ( roman_ℏ italic_c ) ≃ 1 / 137 is the fine-structure constant. This provides a justification of Eddington’s accurate relation eddington1931lambda ; ouf . We note that there is no free parameter in this relation.

At the primordial time t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 the universe had the characteristics of a Planck black hole (“planckion” particle) in Model I and the characteristics of an electron in Model II. However, it is unstable and explodes, leading to a phase of cosmological expansion. This can be viewed as a refinement of the “primeval atom” of Lemaître lemaitreNewton .

Finally, we introduce a nonlinear electromagnetic Lagrangian associated with the quadratic equation of state (2) that describes simultaneously the early inflation, the radiation era, and the dark energy era. The dark energy era is due to the electromagnetic vacuum energy (zero-point radiation). We suggest that nonlinear electrodynamics must also be used when the magnetic field is very low. Therefore, in our approach, both the early inflation and the late acceleration of the universe (dark energy) arise as a consequence of nonlinear electrodynamics. It may account for a form of “generalized radiation” that is present from the begining to the end of the cosmic evolution. This leads to a simple model of magnetic universe without singularity (aioniotic universe).

The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we recall the basic equations of nonlinear electrodynamics and gravitation (general relativity). In Sec. III, we recall the basic equations of cosmology and consider the case where the evolution of the universe is due to a stochastic electromagnetic field. In Sec. IV, we recall the basic equations of nonlinear electrostatics. In Sec. V, we consider the case of a purely magnetic universe. In Sec. VI, we consider the nonlinear electrodynamics associated with a generalized polytropic equation of state and explain why the polytropic indices n=±1𝑛plus-or-minus1n=\pm 1italic_n = ± 1 and the equation of state parameter α=1/3𝛼13\alpha=1/3italic_α = 1 / 3 are naturally selected by electrodynamics. In Secs. VII and VIII, we discuss the evolution of the early and late universe in the context of nonlinear electrodynamics. In Sec. IX, we introduce a nonlinear Lagrangian associated with a generalized form of radiation that accounts both for the early inflation and for the late acceleration of the universe (dark energy). In Sec. X, we include baryonic and dark matter as additional species and describe the complete evolution of the universe. In Sec. XI, we study the electric field produced by a pointlike charge (electron) in the context of nonlinear electrodynamics. In Sec. XII, we point out interesting heuristic connections between nonlinear electrodynamics, quantum gravity, vacuum energy and dark energy.

II Nonlinear electrodynamics and gravitation

In this section, we recall the basic equations of (nonlinear) electrodynamics and general relativity llchamps ; weinbergbook .

II.1 The total action

The geometry of spacetime in general relativity is specified by the metric tensor gμνsubscript𝑔𝜇𝜈g_{\mu\nu}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT which gives the spacetime interval ds𝑑𝑠dsitalic_d italic_s between two infinitesimally separated events, that is555The gμνsubscript𝑔𝜇𝜈g_{\mu\nu}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT may also be viewed as gravitational potentials since the effect of gravity is to modify the curvature of spacetime.

ds2=gμνdxμdxν.𝑑superscript𝑠2subscript𝑔𝜇𝜈𝑑superscript𝑥𝜇𝑑superscript𝑥𝜈ds^{2}=g_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu}.italic_d italic_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (5)

Here and below the Greek indices μ,ν𝜇𝜈\mu,\nuitalic_μ , italic_ν etc run over the spacetime coordinates (ranging from 00 to 3333) while the Latin indices i,j𝑖𝑗i,jitalic_i , italic_j etc run only over the space coordinates (ranging from 1111 to 3333). We assume summation over repeated indices.

We first discuss the Maxwell equations in a general curved spacetime and then focus on Friedmann-Lemaître-Roberston-Walker (FLRW) models of cosmology. Electrodynamics in curved spacetime is most conveniently formulated by giving the action for the electromagnetic fields and their interaction with charged particles. For the sake of generality, we also include the contribution of a perfect fluid (or matter field). The total action of the system, which is the sum of the Einstein-Hilbert action of general relativity +++ the action of the perfect fluid +++ the action of the electromagnetic field +++ the action describing the interaction between the charges and the electromagnetic field can be written as

S=c416πGRgd4x+mgd4x+()gd4xAμJμgd4x,𝑆superscript𝑐416𝜋𝐺𝑅𝑔superscript𝑑4𝑥subscript𝑚𝑔superscript𝑑4𝑥𝑔superscript𝑑4𝑥subscript𝐴𝜇superscript𝐽𝜇𝑔superscript𝑑4𝑥S=\frac{c^{4}}{16\pi G}\int R\sqrt{-g}\,d^{4}x+\int\mathcal{L}_{m}\sqrt{-g}\,d% ^{4}x+\int\mathcal{L}({\cal F})\sqrt{-g}\,d^{4}x-\int A_{\mu}J^{\mu}\sqrt{-g}% \,d^{4}x,italic_S = divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 16 italic_π italic_G end_ARG ∫ italic_R square-root start_ARG - italic_g end_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x + ∫ caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG - italic_g end_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x + ∫ caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ) square-root start_ARG - italic_g end_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x - ∫ italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG - italic_g end_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x , (6)

where R𝑅Ritalic_R is the Ricci curvature scalar, g=det(gμν)𝑔detsubscript𝑔𝜇𝜈g={\rm det}(g_{\mu\nu})italic_g = roman_det ( italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) is the determinant of the metric tensor, Aμ=(U/c,𝐀)superscript𝐴𝜇𝑈𝑐𝐀A^{\mu}=(U/c,{\bf A})italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( italic_U / italic_c , bold_A ) is the electromagnetic quadripotential, and Jμsuperscript𝐽𝜇J^{\mu}italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the quadricurrent density. We have assumed that the Lagrangian density ()\mathcal{L}({\cal F})caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ) of the electromagnetic field is an arbitrary function of the electromagnetic invariant

=14μ0FμνFμν,14subscript𝜇0subscript𝐹𝜇𝜈superscript𝐹𝜇𝜈{\cal F}=\frac{1}{4\mu_{0}}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu},caligraphic_F = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (7)

where Fμν=μAννAμsubscript𝐹𝜇𝜈subscript𝜇subscript𝐴𝜈subscript𝜈subscript𝐴𝜇F_{\mu\nu}=\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the Faraday or electromagnetic field strength tensor (one can replace the covariant derivative Dμsubscript𝐷𝜇D_{\mu}italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT by the partial derivative μsubscript𝜇\partial_{\mu}∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in this equation). In the above equation, μ0subscript𝜇0\mu_{0}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT denotes the magnetic permeability in vacuum. The electric permittivity in vacuum is denoted by ϵ0subscriptitalic-ϵ0\epsilon_{0}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. They are related by μ0ϵ0=1/c2subscript𝜇0subscriptitalic-ϵ01superscript𝑐2\mu_{0}\epsilon_{0}=1/c^{2}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Ordinary (linear) Maxwell electrodynamics corresponds to the Lagrangian

Maxwell=.subscriptMaxwell{\cal L}_{\rm Maxwell}=-{\cal F}.caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Maxwell end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - caligraphic_F . (8)

II.2 The Einstein equations

The Einstein equations of the gravitational field can be derived from the principle of least action δS=δ(Sg+SM)=0𝛿𝑆𝛿subscript𝑆𝑔subscript𝑆𝑀0\delta S=\delta(S_{g}+S_{M})=0italic_δ italic_S = italic_δ ( italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = 0, where Sgsubscript𝑆𝑔S_{g}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and SMsubscript𝑆𝑀S_{M}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the actions of the gravitational field and all sources of mass-energy (including the electromagnetic field), by performing variations with respect to the metric gμνsubscript𝑔𝜇𝜈g_{\mu\nu}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This yields

Rμν12gμνR=8πGc4Tμν,subscript𝑅𝜇𝜈12subscript𝑔𝜇𝜈𝑅8𝜋𝐺superscript𝑐4subscript𝑇𝜇𝜈R_{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}R=\frac{8\pi G}{c^{4}}T_{\mu\nu},italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R = divide start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_G end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (9)

where Rμνsubscript𝑅𝜇𝜈R_{\mu\nu}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the Ricci tensor measuring the curvature of spacetime, R=Rμμ=gμνRμν𝑅superscriptsubscript𝑅𝜇𝜇superscript𝑔𝜇𝜈subscript𝑅𝜇𝜈R=R_{\mu}^{\mu}=g^{\mu\nu}R_{\mu\nu}italic_R = italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the scalar curvature of spacetime, and Tμνsubscript𝑇𝜇𝜈T_{\mu\nu}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the energy-momentum tensor of the matter (or electromagnetic field) given by

Tμν=2g(g)gμν=2gμνgμν.subscript𝑇𝜇𝜈2𝑔𝑔superscript𝑔𝜇𝜈2superscript𝑔𝜇𝜈subscript𝑔𝜇𝜈T_{\mu\nu}=\frac{2}{\sqrt{-g}}\frac{\partial(\sqrt{-g}{\cal L})}{\partial g^{% \mu\nu}}=2\frac{\partial{\cal L}}{\partial g^{\mu\nu}}-g_{\mu\nu}{\cal L}.italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG - italic_g end_ARG end_ARG divide start_ARG ∂ ( square-root start_ARG - italic_g end_ARG caligraphic_L ) end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = 2 divide start_ARG ∂ caligraphic_L end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG - italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_L . (10)

From this formulation, the energy-momentum tensor (10) is automatically symmetric. For a macroscopic body, the energy-momentum tensor can be written as

Tμν=(ρc2+P)uμuνPgμν,subscript𝑇𝜇𝜈𝜌superscript𝑐2𝑃subscript𝑢𝜇subscript𝑢𝜈𝑃subscript𝑔𝜇𝜈T_{\mu\nu}=(\rho c^{2}+P)u_{\mu}u_{\nu}-Pg_{\mu\nu},italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_P ) italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_P italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (11)

where ρc2𝜌superscript𝑐2\rho c^{2}italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the energy density, P𝑃Pitalic_P is the pressure and uμsuperscript𝑢𝜇u^{\mu}italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the quadrivelocity such that uμuμ=1subscript𝑢𝜇superscript𝑢𝜇1u_{\mu}u^{\mu}=1italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1 (for a fluid at rest T00=ρc2subscript𝑇00𝜌superscript𝑐2T_{00}=\rho c^{2}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 00 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and Txx=Tyy=Tzz=Psubscript𝑇𝑥𝑥subscript𝑇𝑦𝑦subscript𝑇𝑧𝑧𝑃T_{xx}=T_{yy}=T_{zz}=Pitalic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_P).

The conservation of energy and momentum is expressed by

DνTμν=0,subscript𝐷𝜈superscript𝑇𝜇𝜈0D_{\nu}T^{\mu\nu}=0,italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0 , (12)

where Dν=1gνgsubscript𝐷𝜈1𝑔subscript𝜈𝑔D_{\nu}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}}\partial_{\nu}\sqrt{-g}italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG - italic_g end_ARG end_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG - italic_g end_ARG is the covariant derivative in a curved spacetime. According to this equation, the divergence of the left hand side of Eq. (9) must be zero. This is actually the case because of the contracted Bianchi identities. As a result, the conservation of energy and momentum is contained in the Einstein equations (9). The equations of the gravitational field contain the equations for the matter which produces this field. However, for a complete determination of the distribution and motion of the matter (or electromagnetic field) one must still supplement to the Einstein equations the equation of state of the matter (or electromagnetic field), i.e., an equation relating the pressure P𝑃Pitalic_P to the energy density ρc2𝜌superscript𝑐2\rho c^{2}italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. This equation must be given along with the gravitational field equations.

II.3 The nonlinear Maxwell equations

The fundamental equations of electromagnetism are the Maxwell equations. In a curved spacetime the first pair of Maxwell equations reads (one can replace the covariant derivative Dμsubscript𝐷𝜇D_{\mu}italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT by the partial derivative μsubscript𝜇\partial_{\mu}∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in this equation)

λFμν+νFλμ+μFνλ=0.subscript𝜆subscript𝐹𝜇𝜈subscript𝜈subscript𝐹𝜆𝜇subscript𝜇subscript𝐹𝜈𝜆0\partial_{\lambda}F_{\mu\nu}+\partial_{\nu}F_{\lambda\mu}+\partial_{\mu}F_{\nu% \lambda}=0.∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 . (13)

The field equations determining the second pair of Maxwell equations can be obtained from the principe of least action δS=0𝛿𝑆0\delta S=0italic_δ italic_S = 0 by varying the electromagnetic potential Aμsubscript𝐴𝜇A_{\mu}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This yields

Dν[()Fμν]=μ0Jμ.subscript𝐷𝜈delimited-[]superscriptsuperscript𝐹𝜇𝜈subscript𝜇0superscript𝐽𝜇D_{\nu}\left[{\cal L}^{\prime}({\cal F})F^{\mu\nu}\right]=\mu_{0}J^{\mu}.italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) italic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] = italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (14)

Equations (13) and (14) form the (nonlinear) Maxwell equations. We see that only the second pair of Maxwell equations is affected by a possible nonlinearity of the Lagrangian.

The conservation of charge is expressed by the equation of continuity

DμJμ=0.subscript𝐷𝜇superscript𝐽𝜇0D_{\mu}J^{\mu}=0.italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0 . (15)

According to this equation, the divergence of the left hand side of Eq. (14) must be zero. This is actually the case because of the antisymmetry of the Faraday tensor. The conservation of charge is therefore included in the Maxwell equations.

II.4 Electromagnetic energy-momentum tensor

The electromagnetic energy-momentum tensor associated with the Lagrangian (){\cal L}({\cal F})caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ) is

Tμν=1μ0()FμαFνα()gμν.subscript𝑇𝜇𝜈1subscript𝜇0superscriptsubscript𝐹𝜇𝛼subscriptsuperscript𝐹𝛼𝜈subscript𝑔𝜇𝜈T_{\mu\nu}=-\frac{1}{\mu_{0}}{\cal L}^{\prime}({\cal F})F_{\mu\alpha}F^{\alpha% }_{\,\,\,\nu}-{\cal L}({\cal F})g_{\mu\nu}.italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ) italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (16)

We note that

Tμμ=4()4().superscriptsubscript𝑇𝜇𝜇4superscript4T_{\mu}^{\mu}=4{\cal F}{\cal L}^{\prime}({\cal F})-4{\cal L}({\cal F}).italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 4 caligraphic_F caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) - 4 caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ) . (17)

In linear electrodynamics (Maxwell=subscriptMaxwell{\cal L}_{\rm Maxwell}=-{\cal F}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Maxwell end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - caligraphic_F) the energy-momentum tensor of the electromagnetic field has the property that T=Tμμ=0𝑇superscriptsubscript𝑇𝜇𝜇0T=T_{\mu}^{\mu}=0italic_T = italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0. With the identity R=(8πG/c4)T𝑅8𝜋𝐺superscript𝑐4𝑇R=-(8\pi G/c^{4})Titalic_R = - ( 8 italic_π italic_G / italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_T obtained from the Einstein equations (9) it follows that in the presence of an electromagnetic field without any masses the scalar curvature of spacetime is zero: R=0𝑅0R=0italic_R = 0. On the other hand, the identity T=ρc23P𝑇𝜌superscript𝑐23𝑃T=\rho c^{2}-3Pitalic_T = italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 italic_P obtained from Eq. (11) implies that P=ρc2/3𝑃𝜌superscript𝑐23P=\rho c^{2}/3italic_P = italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 3. These relations are no more true for a nonlinear electrodynamics.

III Basic equations of cosmology

In this section, we recapitulate the basic equations of cosmology weinbergbook and consider the case where the universe is filled with a stochastic electromagnetic field.

III.1 Friedmann equations

If we consider an expanding homogeneous and isotropic cosmological spacetime (background) with a uniform curvature, the line element is given by the Friedmann-Lemaître-Roberston-Walker (FLRW) metric

ds2=c2dt2a(t)2[dr21kr2+r2(dθ2+sin2θdϕ2)],𝑑superscript𝑠2superscript𝑐2𝑑superscript𝑡2𝑎superscript𝑡2delimited-[]𝑑superscript𝑟21𝑘superscript𝑟2superscript𝑟2𝑑superscript𝜃2superscript2𝜃𝑑superscriptitalic-ϕ2\displaystyle ds^{2}=c^{2}dt^{2}-a(t)^{2}\left[\frac{dr^{2}}{1-kr^{2}}+r^{2}\,% (d\theta^{2}+\sin^{2}\theta\,d\phi^{2})\right],italic_d italic_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_a ( italic_t ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ divide start_ARG italic_d italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 1 - italic_k italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_d italic_θ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + roman_sin start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ italic_d italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] , (18)

where a(t)𝑎𝑡a(t)italic_a ( italic_t ) represents the radius of curvature of the 3333-dimensional space, or the scale factor. By an abuse of language, we shall sometimes call it the “radius of the universe”. On the other hand, k𝑘kitalic_k determines the curvature of space. The universe is closed if k>0𝑘0k>0italic_k > 0, flat if k=0𝑘0k=0italic_k = 0, or open if k<0𝑘0k<0italic_k < 0.

If the universe is isotropic and homogeneous at all points in conformity with the line element (18), and contains a uniform perfect fluid of energy density ρ(t)c2𝜌𝑡superscript𝑐2\rho(t)c^{2}italic_ρ ( italic_t ) italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and isotropic pressure P(t)𝑃𝑡P(t)italic_P ( italic_t ), the energy-momentum tensor Tμνsubscript𝑇𝜇𝜈T_{\mu\nu}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is given by Eq. (11) and we have

T00=ρc2,T11=T22=T33=P.formulae-sequencesubscriptsuperscript𝑇00𝜌superscript𝑐2subscriptsuperscript𝑇11subscriptsuperscript𝑇22subscriptsuperscript𝑇33𝑃\displaystyle T^{0}_{0}=\rho c^{2},\qquad T^{1}_{1}=T^{2}_{2}=T^{3}_{3}=-P.italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - italic_P . (19)

The Einstein equations

Rνμ12gνμRΛgνμ=8πGc2Tνμsubscriptsuperscript𝑅𝜇𝜈12subscriptsuperscript𝑔𝜇𝜈𝑅Λsubscriptsuperscript𝑔𝜇𝜈8𝜋𝐺superscript𝑐2subscriptsuperscript𝑇𝜇𝜈\displaystyle R^{\mu}_{\nu}-\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu}_{\nu}R-\Lambda g^{\mu}_{\nu}=-% \frac{8\pi G}{c^{2}}T^{\mu}_{\nu}italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R - roman_Λ italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - divide start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_G end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (20)

relate the geometrical structure of spacetime (gμνsubscript𝑔𝜇𝜈g_{\mu\nu}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) to the material content of the universe (Tμνsubscript𝑇𝜇𝜈T_{\mu\nu}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) including the electromagnetic field. For the sake of generality, we have included the cosmological constant ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ in the Einstein equations (20). Given Eqs. (18) and (19), the Einstein equations reduce to

8πGρ+Λ=3a˙2+kc2a2,8πGc2PΛ=2aa¨+a˙2+kc2a2,formulae-sequence8𝜋𝐺𝜌Λ3superscript˙𝑎2𝑘superscript𝑐2superscript𝑎28𝜋𝐺superscript𝑐2𝑃Λ2𝑎¨𝑎superscript˙𝑎2𝑘superscript𝑐2superscript𝑎2\displaystyle 8\pi G\rho+\Lambda=3\frac{{\dot{a}}^{2}+kc^{2}}{a^{2}},\qquad% \frac{8\pi G}{c^{2}}P-\Lambda=-\frac{2a\ddot{a}+{\dot{a}}^{2}+kc^{2}}{a^{2}},8 italic_π italic_G italic_ρ + roman_Λ = 3 divide start_ARG over˙ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_k italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , divide start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_G end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG italic_P - roman_Λ = - divide start_ARG 2 italic_a over¨ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG + over˙ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_k italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (21)

where dots denote differentiation with respect to time. These are the well-known Friedmann friedmann1 ; friedmann2 cosmological equations. The Friedmann equations are usually written under the form

H2=8πG3ρkc2a2+Λ3,superscript𝐻28𝜋𝐺3𝜌𝑘superscript𝑐2superscript𝑎2Λ3H^{2}=\frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho-\frac{kc^{2}}{a^{2}}+\frac{\Lambda}{3},italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_G end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ - divide start_ARG italic_k italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG , (22)
2H˙+3H2=8πGc2Pkc2a2+Λ,2˙𝐻3superscript𝐻28𝜋𝐺superscript𝑐2𝑃𝑘superscript𝑐2superscript𝑎2Λ2\dot{H}+3H^{2}=-\frac{8\pi G}{c^{2}}P-\frac{kc^{2}}{a^{2}}+\Lambda,2 over˙ start_ARG italic_H end_ARG + 3 italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - divide start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_G end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG italic_P - divide start_ARG italic_k italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + roman_Λ , (23)

where H=a˙/a𝐻˙𝑎𝑎H=\dot{a}/aitalic_H = over˙ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG / italic_a is the Hubble parameter. From these equations, one can derive the acceleration equation

a¨a=4πG3(ρ+3Pc2)+Λ3.¨𝑎𝑎4𝜋𝐺3𝜌3𝑃superscript𝑐2Λ3\frac{\ddot{a}}{a}=-\frac{4\pi G}{3}\left(\rho+\frac{3P}{c^{2}}\right)+\frac{% \Lambda}{3}.divide start_ARG over¨ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_a end_ARG = - divide start_ARG 4 italic_π italic_G end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ( italic_ρ + divide start_ARG 3 italic_P end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) + divide start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG . (24)

The deceleration parameter is defined by

q=a¨aa˙2.𝑞¨𝑎𝑎superscript˙𝑎2q=-\frac{{\ddot{a}}a}{{\dot{a}}^{2}}.italic_q = - divide start_ARG over¨ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_ARG over˙ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (25)

The universe is decelerating when q>0𝑞0q>0italic_q > 0 and accelerating when q<0𝑞0q<0italic_q < 0.

III.2 Energy conservation equation

Combining Eqs. (22) and (23), we obtain the energy conservation equation

dρdt+3H(ρ+Pc2)=0.𝑑𝜌𝑑𝑡3𝐻𝜌𝑃superscript𝑐20\frac{d\rho}{dt}+3H\left(\rho+\frac{P}{c^{2}}\right)=0.divide start_ARG italic_d italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG + 3 italic_H ( italic_ρ + divide start_ARG italic_P end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) = 0 . (26)

This equation can be directly derived from the relation (12) which is included in the Einstein equations through the contracted Bianchi identities. It can be written under the form

dρ+3daa(ρ+P/c2)=0.𝑑𝜌3𝑑𝑎𝑎𝜌𝑃superscript𝑐20d\rho+3\frac{da}{a}(\rho+P/c^{2})=0.italic_d italic_ρ + 3 divide start_ARG italic_d italic_a end_ARG start_ARG italic_a end_ARG ( italic_ρ + italic_P / italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) = 0 . (27)

For a given barotropic equation of state P=P(ρ)𝑃𝑃𝜌P=P(\rho)italic_P = italic_P ( italic_ρ ), we can solve Eq. (27) to obtain

lna=13dρρ+P(ρ)/c2.𝑎13𝑑𝜌𝜌𝑃𝜌superscript𝑐2\ln a=-\frac{1}{3}\int\frac{d\rho}{\rho+P(\rho)/c^{2}}.roman_ln italic_a = - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ∫ divide start_ARG italic_d italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ + italic_P ( italic_ρ ) / italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (28)

This equation determines the relation ρ(a)𝜌𝑎\rho(a)italic_ρ ( italic_a ) between the energy density and the scale factor. We can then solve the Friedmann equation (22) with ρ=ρ(a)𝜌𝜌𝑎\rho=\rho(a)italic_ρ = italic_ρ ( italic_a ) to obtain the temporal evolution of the scale factor a(t)𝑎𝑡a(t)italic_a ( italic_t ).

The energy conservation equation (27) can be rewritten as

d(ρc2a3)=Pd(a3).𝑑𝜌superscript𝑐2superscript𝑎3𝑃𝑑superscript𝑎3{d}(\rho c^{2}a^{3})=-P{d(a^{3})}.italic_d ( italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) = - italic_P italic_d ( italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) . (29)

Introducing the volume Va3proportional-to𝑉superscript𝑎3V\propto a^{3}italic_V ∝ italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and the energy E=ρc2V𝐸𝜌superscript𝑐2𝑉E=\rho c^{2}Vitalic_E = italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_V, Eq. (29) becomes dE=PdV𝑑𝐸𝑃𝑑𝑉dE=-PdVitalic_d italic_E = - italic_P italic_d italic_V. It can be interpreted as the first principle of thermodynamics for an adiabatic evolution of the universe dS=0𝑑𝑆0dS=0italic_d italic_S = 0 lemaitre1927 ; lemaitre1931 ; cosmopoly1 .

The equation of state parameter is defined by

w=Pρc2.𝑤𝑃𝜌superscript𝑐2w=\frac{P}{\rho c^{2}}.italic_w = divide start_ARG italic_P end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (30)

According to Eq. (26) the energy density decreases with the scale factor when w>1𝑤1w>-1italic_w > - 1 (null dominant energy condition) and increases with the scale factor when w<1𝑤1w<-1italic_w < - 1. When w=1𝑤1w=-1italic_w = - 1 the energy density is constant. The case where the energy density increases with the scale factor corresponds to a phantom universe caldwell ; cosmopoly3 .

Remark: It is possible to develop a useful mechanical analogy to study the Friedmann equation (22). Indeed, it can be cast in the suggestive form

E=12a˙2+V(a),𝐸12superscript˙𝑎2𝑉𝑎E=\frac{1}{2}{\dot{a}}^{2}+V(a),italic_E = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG over˙ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_V ( italic_a ) , (31)

where

E=12kc2,V(a)=4πG3ρ(a)a2Λ6a2.formulae-sequence𝐸12𝑘superscript𝑐2𝑉𝑎4𝜋𝐺3𝜌𝑎superscript𝑎2Λ6superscript𝑎2E=-\frac{1}{2}kc^{2},\qquad V(a)=-\frac{4\pi G}{3}\rho(a)a^{2}-\frac{\Lambda}{% 6}a^{2}.italic_E = - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_k italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_V ( italic_a ) = - divide start_ARG 4 italic_π italic_G end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ ( italic_a ) italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG start_ARG 6 end_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (32)

Eq. (31) has the structure of the first integral of motion for a particle of unit mass in a potential V(a)𝑉𝑎V(a)italic_V ( italic_a ). In that case, E𝐸Eitalic_E represents its conserved energy. The Friedmann equation (22) then has the solution

t=da2[EV(a)]𝑡𝑑𝑎2delimited-[]𝐸𝑉𝑎t=\int\frac{da}{\sqrt{2[E-V(a)]}}italic_t = ∫ divide start_ARG italic_d italic_a end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG 2 [ italic_E - italic_V ( italic_a ) ] end_ARG end_ARG (33)

determining a(t)𝑎𝑡a(t)italic_a ( italic_t ) in reversed form.

III.3 Flat universe

In this paper, we consider a flat universe (k=0𝑘0k=0italic_k = 0) in agreement with the inflation paradigm guthinflation and the observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) planck2014 ; planck2016 . On the other hand, we set the cosmological constant equal to zero (Λ=0Λ0\Lambda=0roman_Λ = 0) because dark energy will be taken into account in the nonlinear electrodynamics. The Friedmann equations (22) and (23) then reduce to the form

H2=(a˙a)2=8πG3ρ,superscript𝐻2superscript˙𝑎𝑎28𝜋𝐺3𝜌H^{2}=\left(\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\right)^{2}=\frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho,italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG over˙ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_a end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_G end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ , (34)
2H˙+3H2=8πGc2P.2˙𝐻3superscript𝐻28𝜋𝐺superscript𝑐2𝑃2\dot{H}+3H^{2}=-\frac{8\pi G}{c^{2}}P.2 over˙ start_ARG italic_H end_ARG + 3 italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - divide start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_G end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG italic_P . (35)

The acceleration equation (24) becomes

a¨a=4πG3(ρ+3Pc2).¨𝑎𝑎4𝜋𝐺3𝜌3𝑃superscript𝑐2\frac{\ddot{a}}{a}=-\frac{4\pi G}{3}\left(\rho+\frac{3P}{c^{2}}\right).divide start_ARG over¨ start_ARG italic_a end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_a end_ARG = - divide start_ARG 4 italic_π italic_G end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ( italic_ρ + divide start_ARG 3 italic_P end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) . (36)

Using Eqs. (34) and (36) we see that the deceleration parameter (25) is related to the equation of state parameter (30) by

q=1+3w2.𝑞13𝑤2q=\frac{1+3w}{2}.italic_q = divide start_ARG 1 + 3 italic_w end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG . (37)

The universe is decelerating when w>1/3𝑤13w>-1/3italic_w > - 1 / 3 (strong energy condition) and accelerating when w<1/3𝑤13w<-1/3italic_w < - 1 / 3; when w=1/3𝑤13w=-1/3italic_w = - 1 / 3 the scale factor increases linearly with time cosmopoly1 .

III.4 Tolman-Ehrenfest averaging procedure

Let us study some general properties of nonlinear electrodynamics in cosmology novello1 ; novello2 ; cgcl ; novello3 ; vollick ; novello4 ; garcia ; kruglov2015a ; kruglov2015 ; kruglov2020 . We assume that the universe is filled with electromagnetic radiation. The electromagnetic field that is of cosmological interest is the cosmic microwave background (CMB). It can be considered as a random field of short coherent radiation wavelength as compared to the cosmological horizon scales. Due to the isotropy of the spatial sections of the FLRW model, an average procedure is needed for compatibility reason if the electromagnetic field is to act as a source of gravity. Using the usual Tolman-Ehrenfest te procedure, we assume that the averaged electromagnetic field obeys the equations

E¯i=0,B¯i=0,EiBj¯=0,formulae-sequencesubscript¯𝐸𝑖0formulae-sequencesubscript¯𝐵𝑖0¯subscript𝐸𝑖subscript𝐵𝑗0\overline{E}_{i}=0,\quad\overline{B}_{i}=0,\quad\overline{E_{i}B_{j}}=0,over¯ start_ARG italic_E end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 , over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 , over¯ start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 0 , (38)
EiEj¯=13E2δij,BiBj¯=13B2δij,formulae-sequence¯subscript𝐸𝑖subscript𝐸𝑗13superscript𝐸2subscript𝛿𝑖𝑗¯subscript𝐵𝑖subscript𝐵𝑗13superscript𝐵2subscript𝛿𝑖𝑗\overline{E_{i}E_{j}}=\frac{1}{3}E^{2}\delta_{ij},\quad\overline{B_{i}B_{j}}=% \frac{1}{3}B^{2}\delta_{ij},over¯ start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , over¯ start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (39)

where X¯¯𝑋\overline{X}over¯ start_ARG italic_X end_ARG denotes an average over a volume that is large compared to the radiation wavelength but small compared to the curvature of spacetime. In the following, we omit the averaging bars for notational simplicity.

With these conditions, the average value of the energy-momentum tensor of the electromagnetic field associated with the Lagrangian density (){\cal L}({\cal F})caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ) [see Eq. (16)] can be written in the form of the energy-momentum tensor for a perfect fluid [see Eq. (11)]. The energy density and the pressure of the radiation are given by novello2 ; novello3

ρc2=()E2(),𝜌superscript𝑐2superscript𝐸2superscript\rho c^{2}=-{\cal L}({\cal F})-E^{2}{\cal L}^{\prime}({\cal F}),italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ) - italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) , (40)
P=()+E22B23(),𝑃superscript𝐸22superscript𝐵23superscriptP={\cal L}({\cal F})+\frac{E^{2}-2B^{2}}{3}{\cal L}^{\prime}({\cal F}),italic_P = caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ) + divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) , (41)

where E2superscript𝐸2E^{2}italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and B2superscript𝐵2B^{2}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are the averaged electric and magnetic fields squared, respectively. For convenience we have rescaled 𝐄𝐄{\bf E}bold_E by 1/(ϵ0)1/21superscriptsubscriptitalic-ϵ0121/(\epsilon_{0})^{1/2}1 / ( italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and 𝐁𝐁{\bf B}bold_B by (μ0)1/2superscriptsubscript𝜇012(\mu_{0})^{1/2}( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The electromagnetic invariant takes the form

=14FμνFμν=B2E22.14subscript𝐹𝜇𝜈superscript𝐹𝜇𝜈superscript𝐵2superscript𝐸22{\cal F}=\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}=\frac{B^{2}-E^{2}}{2}.caligraphic_F = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG . (42)

For Maxwell’s linear electrodynamics described by the Lagrangian (8) the foregoing equations reduce to

ρc2=12(E2+B2),P=16(E2+B2),formulae-sequence𝜌superscript𝑐212superscript𝐸2superscript𝐵2𝑃16superscript𝐸2superscript𝐵2\rho c^{2}=\frac{1}{2}(E^{2}+B^{2}),\qquad P=\frac{1}{6}(E^{2}+B^{2}),italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , italic_P = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 6 end_ARG ( italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , (43)

returning the usual equation of state of radiation

P=13ρc2.𝑃13𝜌superscript𝑐2P=\frac{1}{3}\rho c^{2}.italic_P = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (44)

IV Electrostatics

In electrostatics, in the absence of magnetic field (𝐁=𝟎𝐁0{\bf B}={\bf 0}bold_B = bold_0) and if we can neglect the expansion of the universe (a=1𝑎1a=1italic_a = 1), the nonlinear Maxwell equations can be written as

×𝐄=0𝐄0\nabla\times{\bf E}=0∇ × bold_E = 0 (45)

and

[()𝐄]=ρe,delimited-[]superscript𝐄subscript𝜌𝑒\nabla\cdot\left[{\cal L}^{\prime}({\cal F}){\bf E}\right]=-\rho_{e},∇ ⋅ [ caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) bold_E ] = - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (46)

where ρesubscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{e}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the charge density and

=12E2.12superscript𝐸2{\cal F}=-\frac{1}{2}E^{2}.caligraphic_F = - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (47)

The electric field 𝐄𝐄{\bf E}bold_E is expressed in terms of the scalar potential U𝑈Uitalic_U by the relation

𝐄=U.𝐄𝑈{\bf E}=-\nabla U.bold_E = - ∇ italic_U . (48)

Substituting Eq. (48) into Eq. (46), we get

[()U]=ρe.delimited-[]superscript𝑈subscript𝜌𝑒\nabla\cdot\left[{\cal L}^{\prime}({\cal F})\nabla U\right]=\rho_{e}.∇ ⋅ [ caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) ∇ italic_U ] = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (49)

In particular, in vacuum (ρe=0subscript𝜌𝑒0\rho_{e}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0), the electric potential satisfies the equation

[()U]=0.delimited-[]superscript𝑈0\nabla\cdot\left[{\cal L}^{\prime}({\cal F})\nabla U\right]=0.∇ ⋅ [ caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) ∇ italic_U ] = 0 . (50)

For Maxwell’s linear electrodynamics, Eqs. (49) and (50) reduce to the usual Poisson and Laplace equations ΔU=ρeΔ𝑈subscript𝜌𝑒\Delta U=-\rho_{e}roman_Δ italic_U = - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and ΔU=0Δ𝑈0\Delta U=0roman_Δ italic_U = 0, respectively.

Using the Gauss law (46), the electric field produced by a point charge [ρe=4πeδ(𝐫)subscript𝜌𝑒4𝜋𝑒𝛿𝐫\rho_{e}=\sqrt{4\pi}e\delta({\bf r})italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG italic_e italic_δ ( bold_r )] satisfies the equation

[()𝐄]=4πeδ(𝐫).delimited-[]superscript𝐄4𝜋𝑒𝛿𝐫-\nabla\cdot\left[{\cal L}^{\prime}({\cal F}){\bf E}\right]=\sqrt{4\pi}e\delta% ({\bf r}).- ∇ ⋅ [ caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) bold_E ] = square-root start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG italic_e italic_δ ( bold_r ) . (51)

Its solution is

()E(r)=e4πr2.superscript𝐸𝑟𝑒4𝜋superscript𝑟2-{\cal L}^{\prime}({\cal F})E(r)=\frac{e}{\sqrt{4\pi}r^{2}}.- caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) italic_E ( italic_r ) = divide start_ARG italic_e end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (52)

For Maxwell’s linear electrodynamics, we recover the Coulomb law E(r)=e/(4πr2)𝐸𝑟𝑒4𝜋superscript𝑟2E(r)=e/(\sqrt{4\pi}r^{2})italic_E ( italic_r ) = italic_e / ( square-root start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ).

Finally, using Eq. (47), the electric energy density and the pressure [see Eqs. (40) and (41)] can be written as

ρc2=()+2(),𝜌superscript𝑐22superscript\rho c^{2}=-{\cal L}({\cal F})+2{\cal F}{\cal L}^{\prime}({\cal F}),italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ) + 2 caligraphic_F caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) , (53)
P=()23().𝑃23superscriptP={\cal L}({\cal F})-\frac{2}{3}{\cal F}{\cal L}^{\prime}({\cal F}).italic_P = caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ) - divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG caligraphic_F caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) . (54)

For a given Lagrangian (){\cal L}({\cal F})caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ), these equations define the equation of state P(ρ)𝑃𝜌P(\rho)italic_P ( italic_ρ ) in parametric form with parameter =E2/2<0superscript𝐸220{\cal F}=-E^{2}/2<0caligraphic_F = - italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 < 0. For Maxwell’s linear electrodynamics, we get ρc2=E2/2𝜌superscript𝑐2superscript𝐸22\rho c^{2}=E^{2}/2italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 and P=E2/6𝑃superscript𝐸26P=E^{2}/6italic_P = italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 6 leading to P=ρc2/3𝑃𝜌superscript𝑐23P=\rho c^{2}/3italic_P = italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 3.

V Magnetic universe

We assume that the universe is filled with a magnetic fluid. We suppose that the magnetic field of nonlinear electrodynamics is the main source of gravity. We consider the case E=0𝐸0E=0italic_E = 0 and B0𝐵0B\neq 0italic_B ≠ 0 because only the magnetic field is important in cosmology. Indeed, the electric field is screened by the charged primordial plasma, while the magnetic field lines are frozen lemoine . This leads to the concept of “magnetic universe” novello3 ; novello4 . In this model, the cosmic dynamics is fueled by the magnetic fluid alone.

In a purely magnetic universe (E=0𝐸0{E}={0}italic_E = 0), the energy density and the pressure are given by [see Eqs. (40) and (41)]

ρc2=(),𝜌superscript𝑐2\rho c^{2}=-{\cal L}({\cal F}),italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ) , (55)
P=()43()𝑃43superscriptP={\cal L}({\cal F})-\frac{4}{3}{\cal F}{\cal L}^{\prime}({\cal F})italic_P = caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ) - divide start_ARG 4 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG caligraphic_F caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) (56)

with

=B22.superscript𝐵22{\cal F}=\frac{B^{2}}{2}.caligraphic_F = divide start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG . (57)

For a given Lagrangian (){\cal L}({\cal F})caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ), these equations define the equation of state P(ρ)𝑃𝜌P(\rho)italic_P ( italic_ρ ) in parametric form with parameter =B2/2>0superscript𝐵220{\cal F}=B^{2}/2>0caligraphic_F = italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 > 0. Conversely, for a given equation of state P(ρ)𝑃𝜌P(\rho)italic_P ( italic_ρ ), we can obtain the Lagrangian (){\cal L}({\cal F})caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ) as follows. Combining Eqs. (55) and (56), we find that

P/c2=ρ+43dρdln.𝑃superscript𝑐2𝜌43𝑑𝜌𝑑P/c^{2}=-\rho+\frac{4}{3}\frac{d\rho}{d\ln{\cal F}}.italic_P / italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - italic_ρ + divide start_ARG 4 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_d italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_d roman_ln caligraphic_F end_ARG . (58)

For a given equation of state P=P(ρ)𝑃𝑃𝜌P=P(\rho)italic_P = italic_P ( italic_ρ ), Eq. (58) is a just first order differential equation. Its solution is

ln=43dρP(ρ)/c2+ρ,43𝑑𝜌𝑃𝜌superscript𝑐2𝜌\ln{\cal F}=\frac{4}{3}\int\frac{d\rho}{P(\rho)/c^{2}+\rho},roman_ln caligraphic_F = divide start_ARG 4 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ∫ divide start_ARG italic_d italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_P ( italic_ρ ) / italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ end_ARG , (59)

which determines =(ρ)𝜌{\cal F}={\cal F}(\rho)caligraphic_F = caligraphic_F ( italic_ρ ). If this relation can be inverted, the electromagnetic Lagrangian is given by ()=ρ()c2𝜌superscript𝑐2{\cal L}({\cal F})=-\rho({\cal F})c^{2}caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ) = - italic_ρ ( caligraphic_F ) italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

It is also possible to derive the electromagnetic Lagrangian from the equation of state (or the converse) in a more direct manner by using a simple identity and exploiting the results obtained in cosmology. Combining Eq. (58) with the energy conservation equation (27) we get

d=4daa.𝑑4𝑑𝑎𝑎\frac{d{\cal F}}{\cal F}=-4\frac{da}{a}.divide start_ARG italic_d caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG = - 4 divide start_ARG italic_d italic_a end_ARG start_ARG italic_a end_ARG . (60)

Integrating this relation, we obtain the important identity (see, e.g. kim )

=0a4i.e.B=B0a2,{\cal F}=\frac{{\cal F}_{0}}{a^{4}}\quad{\rm i.e.}\quad B=\frac{B_{0}}{a^{2}},caligraphic_F = divide start_ARG caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG roman_i . roman_e . italic_B = divide start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (61)

where B0subscript𝐵0B_{0}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the present value of the magnetic field and 0=B02/2subscript0superscriptsubscript𝐵022{\cal F}_{0}=B_{0}^{2}/2caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2. Therefore, there exists a simple general relation [Eq. (61)] between the electromagnetic invariant {\cal F}caligraphic_F and the scale factor a𝑎aitalic_a. This identity is useful because, in cosmology, we are used to prescribing an equation of state P=P(ρ)𝑃𝑃𝜌P=P(\rho)italic_P = italic_P ( italic_ρ ) and, from the energy conservation equation (27), derive the relation ρ(a)c2𝜌𝑎superscript𝑐2\rho(a)c^{2}italic_ρ ( italic_a ) italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT between the energy density and the scale factor a𝑎aitalic_a. Many equations of state have been introduced and studied in cosmology. To each of these models, if we know ρ(a)c2𝜌𝑎superscript𝑐2\rho(a)c^{2}italic_ρ ( italic_a ) italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT explicitly, then using Eqs. (55) and (61), we can immediately associate an electromagnetic Lagrangian by simply writing

()=ρ[(0/)1/4]c2.𝜌delimited-[]superscriptsubscript014superscript𝑐2{\cal L}({\cal F})=-\rho[({\cal F}_{0}/{\cal F})^{1/4}]c^{2}.caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ) = - italic_ρ [ ( caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / caligraphic_F ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (62)

Therefore, we can produce a great number of electromagnetic Lagrangians associated with cosmological models. Some examples will be given below. Conversely, for a given electromagnetic Lagrangian (){\cal L}({\cal F})caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ), we can immediately write down the relation ρ(a)c2𝜌𝑎superscript𝑐2\rho(a)c^{2}italic_ρ ( italic_a ) italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT between the energy density and the scale factor a𝑎aitalic_a without any calculation. Indeed, using Eqs. (55) and (61), we have

ρ(a)c2=(0/a4).𝜌𝑎superscript𝑐2subscript0superscript𝑎4\rho(a)c^{2}=-{\cal L}({\cal F}_{0}/a^{4}).italic_ρ ( italic_a ) italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) . (63)

Similarly, using Eqs. (56) and (61), the evolution of the pressure with the scale factor is immediately given by

P(a)=(0/a4)43(0/a4)(0/a4).𝑃𝑎subscript0superscript𝑎443subscript0superscript𝑎4superscriptsubscript0superscript𝑎4P(a)={\cal L}({\cal F}_{0}/a^{4})-\frac{4}{3}({\cal F}_{0}/a^{4}){\cal L}^{% \prime}({\cal F}_{0}/a^{4}).italic_P ( italic_a ) = caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - divide start_ARG 4 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ( caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) . (64)

Equations (63) and (64) define the equation of state P(ρ)𝑃𝜌P(\rho)italic_P ( italic_ρ ) in parametric form with parameter a𝑎aitalic_a.

Remark: For Maxwell’s linear electrodynamics, representing normal radiation,666We call it normal radiation in order to distinguish it from the generalized radiation introduced in Sec. IX. we have

=,ρradc2=,Prad=13,Prad=13ρradc2.formulae-sequenceformulae-sequencesubscript𝜌radsuperscript𝑐2formulae-sequencesubscript𝑃rad13subscript𝑃rad13subscript𝜌radsuperscript𝑐2{\cal L}=-{\cal F},\quad\rho_{\rm rad}c^{2}={\cal F},\quad P_{\rm rad}=\frac{1% }{3}{\cal F},\quad P_{\rm rad}=\frac{1}{3}\rho_{\rm rad}c^{2}.caligraphic_L = - caligraphic_F , italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = caligraphic_F , italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG caligraphic_F , italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (65)

Since

ρradc2==0a4,subscript𝜌radsuperscript𝑐2subscript0superscript𝑎4\rho_{\rm rad}c^{2}={\cal F}=\frac{{\cal F}_{0}}{a^{4}},italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = caligraphic_F = divide start_ARG caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (66)

we find that

0=ρrad,0c2=Ωrad,0ρ0c2,subscript0subscript𝜌rad0superscript𝑐2subscriptΩrad0subscript𝜌0superscript𝑐2{\cal F}_{0}=\rho_{\rm rad,0}c^{2}=\Omega_{\rm rad,0}\rho_{0}c^{2},caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (67)

where ρrad,0c2subscript𝜌rad0superscript𝑐2\rho_{\rm rad,0}c^{2}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the present energy density of normal radiation and Ωrad,0=ρrad,0/ρ0subscriptΩrad0subscript𝜌rad0subscript𝜌0\Omega_{\rm rad,0}=\rho_{\rm rad,0}/\rho_{0}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the present proportion of normal radiation (ρ0c2subscript𝜌0superscript𝑐2\rho_{0}c^{2}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the present energy density of the universe). Therefore, 0subscript0{\cal F}_{0}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT represents the present energy density of normal radiation and B0=20subscript𝐵02subscript0B_{0}=\sqrt{2{\cal F}_{0}}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG 2 caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG the present magnetic field. The dimensional magnetic field is

Bdim=μ0B.subscript𝐵dimsubscript𝜇0𝐵B_{\rm dim}=\sqrt{\mu_{0}}B.italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_dim end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_B . (68)

The vacuum permeability has the value μ0=1.25663706212×109ms2T2g1subscript𝜇01.25663706212superscript109msuperscripts2superscriptT2superscriptg1\mu_{0}=1.25663706212\times 10^{-9}\,{\rm m\,s^{2}\,T^{2}\,g^{-1}}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.25663706212 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. From the observations we have Ωrad,0=9.23765×105subscriptΩrad09.23765superscript105\Omega_{\rm rad,0}=9.23765\times 10^{-5}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 9.23765 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ρ0=8.62×1024gm3subscript𝜌08.62superscript1024gsuperscriptm3\rho_{0}=8.62\times 10^{-24}{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 8.62 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 24 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. This gives B0=4.23×1010Tsubscript𝐵04.23superscript1010TB_{0}=4.23\times 10^{-10}\,{\rm T}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4.23 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 10 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_T. More generally, we have the relations

ρradc2=B22==ρrad,0c2a4.subscript𝜌radsuperscript𝑐2superscript𝐵22subscript𝜌rad0superscript𝑐2superscript𝑎4\rho_{\rm rad}c^{2}=\frac{B^{2}}{2}={\cal F}=\frac{\rho_{\rm rad,0}c^{2}}{a^{4% }}.italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG = caligraphic_F = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (69)

These relations have been established during the normal radiation era but, because of the a4superscript𝑎4a^{-4}italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT law from Eq. (61) which coincides with the a4superscript𝑎4a^{-4}italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT law of normal radiation cosmopoly1 , they are actually valid for all times, even when ρρrad𝜌subscript𝜌rad\rho\neq\rho_{\rm rad}italic_ρ ≠ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. In other words, =B2/2superscript𝐵22{\cal F}=B^{2}/2caligraphic_F = italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 always represents the energy density of the normal radiation, even when the normal radiation is subdominant.

VI Nonlinear electrodynamics corresponding to a generalized polytropic equation of state P/c2=αρ+kρ1+1/n𝑃superscript𝑐2𝛼𝜌𝑘superscript𝜌11𝑛P/c^{2}=\alpha\rho+k\rho^{1+1/n}italic_P / italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_α italic_ρ + italic_k italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + 1 / italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in cosmology

VI.1 Generalized polytropic equation of state and the corresponding Lagrangian

We consider an equation of state of the form

P/c2=αρ+kρ1+1/n,𝑃superscript𝑐2𝛼𝜌𝑘superscript𝜌11𝑛P/c^{2}=\alpha\rho+k\rho^{1+1/n},italic_P / italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_α italic_ρ + italic_k italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + 1 / italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (70)

where ρc2𝜌superscript𝑐2\rho c^{2}italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the energy density. This is the sum of a linear equation of state and a polytropic equation of state. This equation of state has been used in cosmology to describe the evolution of the early and late universe cosmopoly1 ; cosmopoly2 ; cosmopoly3 . Solving the energy conservation equation (27) with the equation of state (70), we obtain777Following cosmopoly1 ; cosmopoly2 we consider the case where the energy density decreases with the scale factor. The case of a phantom evolution where the energy density increases with the scale factor is considered in cosmopoly3 .

ρ=ρ[(aa)[3(1+α)]/n1]n,𝜌subscript𝜌superscriptdelimited-[]minus-or-plussuperscript𝑎subscript𝑎delimited-[]31𝛼𝑛1𝑛\rho=\frac{\rho_{*}}{\left[\left(\frac{a}{a_{*}}\right)^{[3(1+\alpha)]/n}\mp 1% \right]^{n}},italic_ρ = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG [ ( divide start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) ] / italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∓ 1 ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (71)

where asubscript𝑎a_{*}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is an integration constant and ρ=[(α+1)/|k|]nsubscript𝜌superscriptdelimited-[]𝛼1𝑘𝑛\rho_{*}=[(\alpha+1)/|k|]^{n}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ ( italic_α + 1 ) / | italic_k | ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The upper sign corresponds to k>0𝑘0k>0italic_k > 0 and the lower sign corresponds to k<0𝑘0k<0italic_k < 0. The equation of state (70) can be rewritten as

P/c2=αρ±(α+1)ρ(ρρ)1/n.𝑃superscript𝑐2plus-or-minus𝛼𝜌𝛼1𝜌superscript𝜌subscript𝜌1𝑛P/c^{2}=\alpha\rho\pm(\alpha+1)\rho\left(\frac{\rho}{\rho_{*}}\right)^{1/n}.italic_P / italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_α italic_ρ ± ( italic_α + 1 ) italic_ρ ( divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (72)

Using ρc2=𝜌superscript𝑐2\rho c^{2}=-{\cal L}italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - caligraphic_L [see Eq. (55)] and =0/a4subscript0superscript𝑎4{\cal F}={\cal F}_{0}/a^{4}caligraphic_F = caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [see Eq. (61)] yielding /=(a/a)4subscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑎𝑎4{\cal F}/{\cal F}_{*}=(a_{*}/a)^{4}caligraphic_F / caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with =0/a4subscriptsubscript0superscriptsubscript𝑎4{\cal F}_{*}={\cal F}_{0}/a_{*}^{4}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, we find that the Lagrangian associated with the equation of state (72) in cosmology reads

=ρc2[()[3(1+α)]/(4n)1]n.subscript𝜌superscript𝑐2superscriptdelimited-[]minus-or-plussuperscriptsubscriptdelimited-[]31𝛼4𝑛1𝑛{\cal L}=\frac{-\rho_{*}c^{2}}{\left[\left(\frac{{\cal F}_{*}}{{\cal F}}\right% )^{[3(1+\alpha)]/(4n)}\mp 1\right]^{n}}.caligraphic_L = divide start_ARG - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG [ ( divide start_ARG caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) ] / ( 4 italic_n ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∓ 1 ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (73)

VI.2 Conditions of validity

It is important to note that the electromagnetic invariant {\cal F}caligraphic_F has not a constant sign depending whether the electric or magnetic field dominates. If the magnetic field dominates, we have =B2/2>0superscript𝐵220{\cal F}=B^{2}/2>0caligraphic_F = italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 > 0 while =E2/2<0superscript𝐸220{\cal F}=-E^{2}/2<0caligraphic_F = - italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 < 0 when the electric field dominates. The Lagrangian (73) has been derived in a cosmological context where the magnetic field dominates. In that case, {\cal F}caligraphic_F and subscript{\cal F}_{*}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are positive. Now, the same Lagrangian should also describe the case where the electric field dominates. But in that case {\cal F}caligraphic_F is negative while subscript{\cal F}_{*}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT has the same value as before, being a positive constant. Therefore, />0subscript0{\cal F}/{\cal F}_{*}>0caligraphic_F / caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0 in the magnetic regime while /<0subscript0{\cal F}/{\cal F}_{*}<0caligraphic_F / caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < 0 in the electric regime. If we want to describe the two situations with the same Lagrangian, and since the Lagrangian (73) involves a power-law (/)[3(1+α)]/(4n)superscriptsubscriptdelimited-[]31𝛼4𝑛\left({{\cal F}_{*}}/{{\cal F}}\right)^{[3(1+\alpha)]/(4n)}( caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / caligraphic_F ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) ] / ( 4 italic_n ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, it is necessary that [3(1+α)]/4ndelimited-[]31𝛼4𝑛[3(1+\alpha)]/4n[ 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) ] / 4 italic_n be an integer.888Of course, we could put an absolute value |/|[3(1+α)]/(4n)superscriptsubscriptdelimited-[]31𝛼4𝑛|{\cal F}_{*}/{\cal F}|^{[3(1+\alpha)]/(4n)}| caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / caligraphic_F | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) ] / ( 4 italic_n ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in Eq. (73) but we find this procedure a bit artificial and prefer selecting models where no absolute value arises. For simplicity, we shall require that

3(1+α)4n=±1.31𝛼4𝑛plus-or-minus1\frac{3(1+\alpha)}{4n}=\pm 1.divide start_ARG 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_n end_ARG = ± 1 . (74)

On the other hand, in order to recover the Maxwell Lagrangian Maxwell=subscriptMaxwell{\cal L}_{\rm Maxwell}=-{\cal F}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Maxwell end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - caligraphic_F when (/)[3(1+α)]/(4n)1much-less-thansuperscriptsubscriptdelimited-[]31𝛼4𝑛1({{\cal F}}/{{\cal F}_{*}})^{[3(1+\alpha)]/(4n)}\ll 1( caligraphic_F / caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) ] / ( 4 italic_n ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≪ 1 (correspondence principle), we need

α=13and=ρc2.formulae-sequence𝛼13andsubscriptsubscript𝜌superscript𝑐2\alpha=\frac{1}{3}\qquad{\rm and}\qquad{\cal F}_{*}=\rho_{*}c^{2}.italic_α = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG roman_and caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (75)

The two conditions (74) and (75) imply

n=±1.𝑛plus-or-minus1n=\pm 1.italic_n = ± 1 . (76)

Interestingly, we recover the two canonical models considered in cosmopoly1 ; cosmopoly2 ; cosmopoly3 :

(i) The model α=1/3𝛼13\alpha=1/3italic_α = 1 / 3 and n=1𝑛1n=1italic_n = 1 corresponds to

P/c2=13ρ±43ρ2ρ,=1.formulae-sequence𝑃superscript𝑐2plus-or-minus13𝜌43superscript𝜌2subscript𝜌minus-or-plus1subscriptP/c^{2}=\frac{1}{3}\rho\pm\frac{4}{3}\frac{\rho^{2}}{\rho_{*}},\qquad{\cal L}=% \frac{-{\cal F}}{1\mp\frac{{\cal F}}{{\cal F}_{*}}}.italic_P / italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ ± divide start_ARG 4 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG , caligraphic_L = divide start_ARG - caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG 1 ∓ divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG . (77)

It describes the early universe. In practice we shall consider the lower sign (k<0𝑘0k<0italic_k < 0) corresponding to a nonsingular (inflationary) early universe cosmopoly1 . Interestingly, the Lagrangian from Eq. (77) coincides with the one introduced by Kruglov kruglov2015a ; kruglov2015 from other arguments.

(ii) The model α=1/3𝛼13\alpha=1/3italic_α = 1 / 3 and n=1𝑛1n=-1italic_n = - 1 corresponds to

P/c2=13ρ±43ρ,=±.formulae-sequence𝑃superscript𝑐2plus-or-minus13𝜌43subscript𝜌plus-or-minussubscriptP/c^{2}=\frac{1}{3}\rho\pm\frac{4}{3}\rho_{*},\qquad{\cal L}=-{\cal F}\pm{\cal F% }_{*}.italic_P / italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ ± divide start_ARG 4 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , caligraphic_L = - caligraphic_F ± caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (78)

It describes the late universe. In practice we shall consider the lower sign (k<0𝑘0k<0italic_k < 0) corresponding to a nonsingular (inflationary) late universe cosmopoly2 .

Remark: More generally, in the foregoing discussion, 1/n1𝑛1/n1 / italic_n could be any positive or negative integer. However, by considering a polytropic equation of state with an arbitrary index n𝑛nitalic_n, we have shown in vacuumon that the values n=±1𝑛plus-or-minus1n=\pm 1italic_n = ± 1 are selected by an extremum principle: they turn out to minimize the mass of the real SF associated with the generalized polytropic equation of state (70). This may give them a special status, in addition to the argument of simplicity invoked above.

VII Nonlinear electrodynamics based on the Lagrangian =/(1+/I)1subscript𝐼{\cal L}=-{\cal F}/(1+{\cal F}/{\cal F}_{I})caligraphic_L = - caligraphic_F / ( 1 + caligraphic_F / caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ): Cosmology in the early universe

In the early universe, we consider a nonlinear electrodynamics based on the Lagrangian

=1+I,1subscript𝐼{\cal L}=\frac{-{\cal F}}{1+\frac{{\cal F}}{{\cal F}_{I}}},caligraphic_L = divide start_ARG - caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG 1 + divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG , (79)

where I=ρIc2subscript𝐼subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2{\cal F}_{I}=\rho_{I}c^{2}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. We shall discuss later the value of the characteristic density ρIsubscript𝜌𝐼\rho_{I}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT appearing in Eq. (79). From Eqs. (55) and (56) we find that the energy density and the pressure are given by

ρc2=1+ρIc2,𝜌superscript𝑐21subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2\rho c^{2}=\frac{{\cal F}}{1+\frac{{\cal F}}{\rho_{I}c^{2}}},italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG 1 + divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG , (80)
P=(13ρIc2)(1+ρIc2)2.𝑃13subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2superscript1subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐22P=\frac{{\cal F}\left(\frac{1}{3}-\frac{\cal F}{\rho_{I}c^{2}}\right)}{\left(1% +\frac{{\cal F}}{\rho_{I}c^{2}}\right)^{2}}.italic_P = divide start_ARG caligraphic_F ( divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG - divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (81)

Eliminating {\cal F}caligraphic_F between these two expressions we obtain the quadratic equation of state

P=4ρ2c23ρI+13ρc2.𝑃4superscript𝜌2superscript𝑐23subscript𝜌𝐼13𝜌superscript𝑐2P=-\frac{4\rho^{2}c^{2}}{3\rho_{I}}+\frac{1}{3}\rho c^{2}.italic_P = - divide start_ARG 4 italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 3 italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (82)

This equation of state has been studied in cosmopoly1 ; universe to model the early universe. Below, we recall its main properties.

VII.1 Generalized polytropic equation of state

For the sake of generality, we consider a generalized polytropic equation of state of the form

P=(α+1)ρIc2(ρρI)1+1/n+αρc2𝑃𝛼1subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2superscript𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼11𝑛𝛼𝜌superscript𝑐2P=-(\alpha+1)\rho_{I}c^{2}\left(\frac{\rho}{\rho_{I}}\right)^{1+{1}/{n}}+% \alpha\rho c^{2}italic_P = - ( italic_α + 1 ) italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + 1 / italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_α italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (83)

with n>0𝑛0n>0italic_n > 0 and 1<α11𝛼1-1<\alpha\leq 1- 1 < italic_α ≤ 1 cosmopoly1 ; universe , even if we shall finally take α=1/3𝛼13\alpha=1/3italic_α = 1 / 3 and n=1𝑛1n=1italic_n = 1 for the reasons explained in Sec. VI.2. For ρρImuch-less-than𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼\rho\ll\rho_{I}italic_ρ ≪ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we obtain the linear equation of state Pαρc2similar-to𝑃𝛼𝜌superscript𝑐2P\sim\alpha\rho c^{2}italic_P ∼ italic_α italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. For ρρI𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼\rho\rightarrow\rho_{I}italic_ρ → italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we get PρIc2𝑃subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2P\rightarrow-\rho_{I}c^{2}italic_P → - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT corresponding to the equation of state of vacuum energy.

VII.2 Evolution of the density, pressure and scale factor

Solving the energy conservation equation (27) with the equation of state (83) we find that the energy density evolves with the scale factor as

ρ=ρI[1+(a/a1)3(1+α)n]n,𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼superscriptdelimited-[]1superscript𝑎subscript𝑎131𝛼𝑛𝑛\rho=\frac{\rho_{I}}{\left[1+(a/a_{1})^{\frac{3(1+\alpha)}{n}}\right]^{n}},italic_ρ = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG [ 1 + ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (84)

where a1subscript𝑎1a_{1}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a constant of integration. The pressure depends on the scale factor as

PρIc2=α(a/a1)3(α+1)n1[(a/a1)3(α+1)n+1]n+1.𝑃subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2𝛼superscript𝑎subscript𝑎13𝛼1𝑛1superscriptdelimited-[]superscript𝑎subscript𝑎13𝛼1𝑛1𝑛1\frac{P}{\rho_{I}c^{2}}=\frac{\alpha(a/a_{1})^{\frac{3(\alpha+1)}{n}}-1}{\left% [(a/a_{1})^{\frac{3(\alpha+1)}{n}}+1\right]^{n+1}}.divide start_ARG italic_P end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_α ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_ARG start_ARG [ ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (85)

For aa1much-less-than𝑎subscript𝑎1a\ll a_{1}italic_a ≪ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the energy density is approximately constant

ρρI,similar-to-or-equals𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼\rho\simeq\rho_{I},italic_ρ ≃ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (86)

and the pressure tends to PρIc2𝑃subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2P\rightarrow-\rho_{I}c^{2}italic_P → - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT corresponding to vacuum energy. The Hubble parameter is constant, with value H=(8π/3)1/2tI1𝐻superscript8𝜋312superscriptsubscript𝑡𝐼1H=(8\pi/3)^{1/2}t_{I}^{-1}italic_H = ( 8 italic_π / 3 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where tI=1/(GρI)1/2subscript𝑡𝐼1superscript𝐺subscript𝜌𝐼12t_{I}=1/(G\rho_{I})^{1/2}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / ( italic_G italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is a characteristic time associated with ρIsubscript𝜌𝐼\rho_{I}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This leads to a phase of early inflation during which the scale factor increases exponentially rapidly with time as e(8π/3)1/2t/tIsuperscript𝑒superscript8𝜋312𝑡subscript𝑡𝐼e^{(8\pi/3)^{1/2}t/t_{I}}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 8 italic_π / 3 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t / italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (early de Sitter era).

For aa1much-greater-than𝑎subscript𝑎1a\gg a_{1}italic_a ≫ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the energy density decreases algebraically as

ρρIa13(1+α)a3(1+α).similar-to𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼superscriptsubscript𝑎131𝛼superscript𝑎31𝛼\rho\sim\frac{\rho_{I}a_{1}^{3(1+\alpha)}}{a^{3(1+\alpha)}}.italic_ρ ∼ divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (87)

In that case, it behaves as an α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-fluid with a linear equation of state Pαρc2similar-to𝑃𝛼𝜌superscript𝑐2P\sim\alpha\rho c^{2}italic_P ∼ italic_α italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. This leads to an α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-era during which the scale factor increases algebraically rapidly with time as t2/[3(1+α)]superscript𝑡2delimited-[]31𝛼t^{2/[3(1+\alpha)]}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 / [ 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) ] end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and the density decreases as t2superscript𝑡2t^{-2}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The expansion of the universe is decelerating if α>1/3𝛼13\alpha>-1/3italic_α > - 1 / 3 and accelerating if α<1/3𝛼13\alpha<-1/3italic_α < - 1 / 3. We can write the energy density of the α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-fluid as

ρα=Ωα,0ρ0a3(1+α),subscript𝜌𝛼subscriptΩ𝛼0subscript𝜌0superscript𝑎31𝛼\rho_{\alpha}=\frac{\Omega_{\alpha,0}\rho_{0}}{a^{3(1+\alpha)}},italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (88)

where ρ0c2subscript𝜌0superscript𝑐2\rho_{0}c^{2}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the present energy density of the universe and Ωα,0subscriptΩ𝛼0\Omega_{\alpha,0}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the present fraction of the α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-fluid (e.g. radiation when α=1/3𝛼13\alpha=1/3italic_α = 1 / 3). Comparing Eq. (87) with Eq. (88) and introducing the convenient notation ΩI,0=ρI/ρ0subscriptΩ𝐼0subscript𝜌𝐼subscript𝜌0\Omega_{I,0}=\rho_{I}/\rho_{0}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we get

a1=(Ωα,0ΩI,0)13(1+α).subscript𝑎1superscriptsubscriptΩ𝛼0subscriptΩ𝐼0131𝛼a_{1}=\left(\frac{\Omega_{\alpha,0}}{\Omega_{I,0}}\right)^{\frac{1}{3(1+\alpha% )}}.italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (89)

This relation determines the constant a1subscript𝑎1a_{1}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (we note that its value is independent of n𝑛nitalic_n). We can then rewrite Eq. (84) as

ρρ0=Ωα,0[a3(α+1)n+(Ωα,0ΩI,0)1/n]n.𝜌subscript𝜌0subscriptΩ𝛼0superscriptdelimited-[]superscript𝑎3𝛼1𝑛superscriptsubscriptΩ𝛼0subscriptΩ𝐼01𝑛𝑛\frac{\rho}{\rho_{0}}=\frac{\Omega_{\alpha,0}}{\left[a^{\frac{3(\alpha+1)}{n}}% +\left(\frac{\Omega_{\alpha,0}}{\Omega_{I,0}}\right)^{1/n}\right]^{n}}.divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG [ italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (90)

The equation of state (83) thus describes the smooth transition between a phase of inflation and an α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-era in the early universe. The characteristic scale a1subscript𝑎1a_{1}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT marks the transition between the vacuum energy (de Sitter) era and the α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-era. At a=a1𝑎subscript𝑎1a=a_{1}italic_a = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we have ρ1=ρI/2nsubscript𝜌1subscript𝜌𝐼superscript2𝑛\rho_{1}=\rho_{I}/2^{n}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and P1=[(α1)/2n+1]ρIc2subscript𝑃1delimited-[]𝛼1superscript2𝑛1subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2P_{1}=[(\alpha-1)/2^{n+1}]\rho_{I}c^{2}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ ( italic_α - 1 ) / 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The equation of state (83) is studied in detail in cosmopoly1 ; universe . The energy density decreases monotonically from ρIsubscript𝜌𝐼\rho_{I}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to 00. When α0𝛼0\alpha\geq 0italic_α ≥ 0, the pressure increases from P=ρIc2𝑃subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2P=-\rho_{I}c^{2}italic_P = - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT to a maximum positive value Pe/(ρIc2)=αn+1nn/[(α+1)n(n+1)n+1]subscript𝑃𝑒subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2superscript𝛼𝑛1superscript𝑛𝑛delimited-[]superscript𝛼1𝑛superscript𝑛1𝑛1P_{e}/(\rho_{I}c^{2})=\alpha^{n+1}n^{n}/[(\alpha+1)^{n}(n+1)^{n+1}]italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) = italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / [ ( italic_α + 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_n + 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] at ae/a1=[(α+n+1)/(nα)]n/[3(α+1)]subscript𝑎𝑒subscript𝑎1superscriptdelimited-[]𝛼𝑛1𝑛𝛼𝑛delimited-[]3𝛼1a_{e}/a_{1}=[(\alpha+n+1)/(n\alpha)]^{n/[3(\alpha+1)]}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ ( italic_α + italic_n + 1 ) / ( italic_n italic_α ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n / [ 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) ] end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ρe/ρI=[αn/(α+1)(n+1)]nsubscript𝜌𝑒subscript𝜌𝐼superscriptdelimited-[]𝛼𝑛𝛼1𝑛1𝑛\rho_{e}/\rho_{I}=[\alpha n/(\alpha+1)(n+1)]^{n}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ italic_α italic_n / ( italic_α + 1 ) ( italic_n + 1 ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT then decreases to zero. The pressure vanishes when aw/a1=(1/α)n/[3(α+1)]subscript𝑎𝑤subscript𝑎1superscript1𝛼𝑛delimited-[]3𝛼1a_{w}/a_{1}=(1/\alpha)^{n/[3(\alpha+1)]}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( 1 / italic_α ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n / [ 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) ] end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ρw/ρI=[α/(α+1)]nsubscript𝜌𝑤subscript𝜌𝐼superscriptdelimited-[]𝛼𝛼1𝑛\rho_{w}/\rho_{I}=[\alpha/(\alpha+1)]^{n}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ italic_α / ( italic_α + 1 ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. When α<0𝛼0\alpha<0italic_α < 0, the pressure monotonically increases from P=ρIc2𝑃subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2P=-\rho_{I}c^{2}italic_P = - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT to zero. It is always negative. In this model, there is no initial singularity (no big bang). The universe exists from the infinite past and the scale factor tends to zero when t𝑡t\rightarrow-\inftyitalic_t → - ∞. The temporal evolution of the scale factor a(t)𝑎𝑡a(t)italic_a ( italic_t ) can be obtained analytically (in reversed form) in terms of hypergeometric functions [see Eq. (61) in cosmopoly1 ]. The evolution of the temperature is discussed in cosmopoly1 . We refer to Figs. 2, 4, 8 and 10 of cosmopoly1 for an illustration of the previous results.

VII.3 Equation of state parameter, deceleration parameter and squared speed of sound

The equation of state parameter w=P/(ρc2)𝑤𝑃𝜌superscript𝑐2w=P/(\rho c^{2})italic_w = italic_P / ( italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) is given by

w=(α+1)(ρρI)1/n+α.𝑤𝛼1superscript𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼1𝑛𝛼w=-(\alpha+1)\left(\frac{\rho}{\rho_{I}}\right)^{1/n}+\alpha.italic_w = - ( italic_α + 1 ) ( divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_α . (91)

Using Eq. (84) we get

w=α(a/a1)3(α+1)n1(a/a1)3(α+1)n+1.𝑤𝛼superscript𝑎subscript𝑎13𝛼1𝑛1superscript𝑎subscript𝑎13𝛼1𝑛1w=\frac{\alpha(a/a_{1})^{\frac{3(\alpha+1)}{n}}-1}{(a/a_{1})^{\frac{3(\alpha+1% )}{n}}+1}.italic_w = divide start_ARG italic_α ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 end_ARG . (92)

The pressure vanishes (w=0𝑤0w=0italic_w = 0) when aw/a1=(1/α)n/[3(α+1)]subscript𝑎𝑤subscript𝑎1superscript1𝛼𝑛delimited-[]3𝛼1a_{w}/a_{1}=(1/\alpha)^{n/[3(\alpha+1)]}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( 1 / italic_α ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n / [ 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) ] end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ρw/ρI=[α/(α+1)]nsubscript𝜌𝑤subscript𝜌𝐼superscriptdelimited-[]𝛼𝛼1𝑛\rho_{w}/\rho_{I}=[\alpha/(\alpha+1)]^{n}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ italic_α / ( italic_α + 1 ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (when α0𝛼0\alpha\geq 0italic_α ≥ 0).

The deceleration parameter [see Eq. (37)] is given by

q=1+3α232(α+1)(ρρI)1/n.𝑞13𝛼232𝛼1superscript𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼1𝑛q=\frac{1+3\alpha}{2}-\frac{3}{2}(\alpha+1)\left(\frac{\rho}{\rho_{I}}\right)^% {1/n}.italic_q = divide start_ARG 1 + 3 italic_α end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG - divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( italic_α + 1 ) ( divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (93)

Using Eq. (84) we get

q=(1+3α)(a/a1)3(α+1)n22[(a/a1)3(α+1)n+1].𝑞13𝛼superscript𝑎subscript𝑎13𝛼1𝑛22delimited-[]superscript𝑎subscript𝑎13𝛼1𝑛1q=\frac{(1+3\alpha)(a/a_{1})^{\frac{3(\alpha+1)}{n}}-2}{2\left[(a/a_{1})^{% \frac{3(\alpha+1)}{n}}+1\right]}.italic_q = divide start_ARG ( 1 + 3 italic_α ) ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_ARG start_ARG 2 [ ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 ] end_ARG . (94)

The universe is accelerating (q<0𝑞0q<0italic_q < 0) when a<ac𝑎subscript𝑎𝑐a<a_{c}italic_a < italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and decelerating (q>0𝑞0q>0italic_q > 0) when a>ac𝑎subscript𝑎𝑐a>a_{c}italic_a > italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with ac/a1=[2/(1+3α)]n/[3(α+1)]subscript𝑎𝑐subscript𝑎1superscriptdelimited-[]213𝛼𝑛delimited-[]3𝛼1a_{c}/a_{1}=[2/(1+3\alpha)]^{n/[3(\alpha+1)]}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ 2 / ( 1 + 3 italic_α ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n / [ 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) ] end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ρc/ρI=(1+3α)n/[3(α+1)]nsubscript𝜌𝑐subscript𝜌𝐼superscript13𝛼𝑛superscriptdelimited-[]3𝛼1𝑛\rho_{c}/\rho_{I}=(1+3\alpha)^{n}/[3(\alpha+1)]^{n}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( 1 + 3 italic_α ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / [ 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (provided that α>1/3𝛼13\alpha>-1/3italic_α > - 1 / 3). Therefore, acsubscript𝑎𝑐a_{c}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT marks the end of the early inflation.

The squared speed of sound cs2=dP/dρsuperscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠2𝑑𝑃𝑑𝜌c_{s}^{2}=dP/d\rhoitalic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_d italic_P / italic_d italic_ρ is given by

cs2c2=(α+1)(1+1n)(ρρI)1/n+α.superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠2superscript𝑐2𝛼111𝑛superscript𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼1𝑛𝛼\frac{c_{s}^{2}}{c^{2}}=-(\alpha+1)\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)\left(\frac{\rho}% {\rho_{I}}\right)^{1/n}+\alpha.divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = - ( italic_α + 1 ) ( 1 + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_n end_ARG ) ( divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_α . (95)

Using Eq. (84) we get

cs2c2=α(a/a1)3(α+1)nα+n+1n(a/a1)3(α+1)n+1.superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠2superscript𝑐2𝛼superscript𝑎subscript𝑎13𝛼1𝑛𝛼𝑛1𝑛superscript𝑎subscript𝑎13𝛼1𝑛1\frac{c_{s}^{2}}{c^{2}}=\frac{\alpha(a/a_{1})^{\frac{3(\alpha+1)}{n}}-\frac{% \alpha+n+1}{n}}{(a/a_{1})^{\frac{3(\alpha+1)}{n}}+1}.divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_α ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_α + italic_n + 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 end_ARG . (96)

When α0𝛼0\alpha\geq 0italic_α ≥ 0, the speed of sound is imaginary (cs2<0superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠20c_{s}^{2}<0italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < 0) when a<ae𝑎subscript𝑎𝑒a<a_{e}italic_a < italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and real (cs2>0superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠20c_{s}^{2}>0italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 0) when a>ae𝑎subscript𝑎𝑒a>a_{e}italic_a > italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with ae/a1=[(α+n+1)/(nα)]n/[3(α+1)]subscript𝑎𝑒subscript𝑎1superscriptdelimited-[]𝛼𝑛1𝑛𝛼𝑛delimited-[]3𝛼1a_{e}/a_{1}=[(\alpha+n+1)/(n\alpha)]^{n/[3(\alpha+1)]}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ ( italic_α + italic_n + 1 ) / ( italic_n italic_α ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n / [ 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) ] end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ρe/ρI=[αn/(α+1)(n+1)]nsubscript𝜌𝑒subscript𝜌𝐼superscriptdelimited-[]𝛼𝑛𝛼1𝑛1𝑛\rho_{e}/\rho_{I}=[\alpha n/(\alpha+1)(n+1)]^{n}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ italic_α italic_n / ( italic_α + 1 ) ( italic_n + 1 ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (this is the point where the pressure reaches its maximum value Pesubscript𝑃𝑒P_{e}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT so that cs2=dP/dρ=0superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠2𝑑𝑃𝑑𝜌0c_{s}^{2}=dP/d\rho=0italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_d italic_P / italic_d italic_ρ = 0). When α<0𝛼0\alpha<0italic_α < 0, the speed of sound is always imaginary (cs2<0superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠20c_{s}^{2}<0italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < 0). When it is real, the speed of sound is always less than the speed of light.

As the universe expands from a=0𝑎0a=0italic_a = 0 to a=+𝑎a=+\inftyitalic_a = + ∞, the equation of state parameter w𝑤witalic_w increases from 11-1- 1 to α𝛼\alphaitalic_α, the deceleration parameter q𝑞qitalic_q increases from 11-1- 1 to (1+3α)/213𝛼2(1+3\alpha)/2( 1 + 3 italic_α ) / 2 and the ratio (cs/c)2superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠𝑐2(c_{s}/c)^{2}( italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_c ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT increases from (α+n+1)/n𝛼𝑛1𝑛-(\alpha+n+1)/n- ( italic_α + italic_n + 1 ) / italic_n to α𝛼\alphaitalic_α (see Fig. 6 in cosmopoly1 ).

VII.4 Application to the radiation

In this section, we specifically apply the preceding results to the case n=1𝑛1n=1italic_n = 1 and α=1/3𝛼13\alpha=1/3italic_α = 1 / 3 (radiation). This corresponds to the equation of state (82). For ρρImuch-less-than𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼\rho\ll\rho_{I}italic_ρ ≪ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we recover the equation of state of radiation Pρc2/3similar-to𝑃𝜌superscript𝑐23P\sim\rho c^{2}/3italic_P ∼ italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 3. For ρρI𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼\rho\rightarrow\rho_{I}italic_ρ → italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we get PρIc2𝑃subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2P\rightarrow-\rho_{I}c^{2}italic_P → - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT corresponding to vacuum energy. The energy density and the pressure evolve with the scale factor as

ρ=ρI1+(a/a1)4,PρIc2=13(a/a1)41[(a/a1)4+1]2.formulae-sequence𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼1superscript𝑎subscript𝑎14𝑃subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐213superscript𝑎subscript𝑎141superscriptdelimited-[]superscript𝑎subscript𝑎1412\rho=\frac{\rho_{I}}{1+(a/a_{1})^{4}},\qquad\frac{P}{\rho_{I}c^{2}}=\frac{% \frac{1}{3}(a/a_{1})^{4}-1}{\left[(a/a_{1})^{4}+1\right]^{2}}.italic_ρ = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 1 + ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , divide start_ARG italic_P end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_ARG start_ARG [ ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (97)

For aa1much-less-than𝑎subscript𝑎1a\ll a_{1}italic_a ≪ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the energy density is approximately constant with value ρρIsimilar-to-or-equals𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼\rho\simeq\rho_{I}italic_ρ ≃ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and the pressure tends to PρIc2𝑃subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2P\rightarrow-\rho_{I}c^{2}italic_P → - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (vacuum energy). This leads to a phase of early inflation during which the scale factor increases exponentially rapidly with time as e(8π/3)1/2t/tIsuperscript𝑒superscript8𝜋312𝑡subscript𝑡𝐼e^{(8\pi/3)^{1/2}t/t_{I}}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 8 italic_π / 3 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t / italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (early de Sitter era). For aa1much-greater-than𝑎subscript𝑎1a\gg a_{1}italic_a ≫ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the energy density decreases algebraically as

ρρIa14a4,similar-to𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼superscriptsubscript𝑎14superscript𝑎4\rho\sim\frac{\rho_{I}a_{1}^{4}}{a^{4}},italic_ρ ∼ divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (98)

corresponding to the radiation with a linear equation of state Pρc2/3similar-to𝑃𝜌superscript𝑐23P\sim\rho c^{2}/3italic_P ∼ italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 3. During the radiation era, the scale factor increases algebraically rapidly with time as t1/2superscript𝑡12t^{1/2}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and the density decreases as t2superscript𝑡2t^{-2}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The expansion of the universe is decelerating. We can write the energy density of radiation as

ρrad=Ωrad,0ρ0a4,subscript𝜌radsubscriptΩrad0subscript𝜌0superscript𝑎4\rho_{\rm rad}=\frac{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}\rho_{0}}{a^{4}},italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (99)

where ρ0c2subscript𝜌0superscript𝑐2\rho_{0}c^{2}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the present energy density of the universe and Ωrad,0subscriptΩrad0\Omega_{\rm rad,0}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the present fraction of radiation.

The equation of state (82) describes the smooth transition between a phase of inflation and the radiation era in the early universe. The transition between the vacuum energy (de Sitter) era and the radiation era takes place at

a1=(Ωrad,0ΩI,0)1/4.subscript𝑎1superscriptsubscriptΩrad0subscriptΩ𝐼014a_{1}=\left(\frac{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}}{\Omega_{I,0}}\right)^{1/4}.italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (100)

At a=a1𝑎subscript𝑎1a=a_{1}italic_a = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we have ρ1=ρI/2subscript𝜌1subscript𝜌𝐼2\rho_{1}=\rho_{I}/2italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 2 and P1=ρIc2/6subscript𝑃1subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐26P_{1}=-\rho_{I}c^{2}/6italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 6. The equation of state (82) is studied in detail in cosmopoly1 ; universe . The energy density decreases monotonically from ρIsubscript𝜌𝐼\rho_{I}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to 00. The pressure increases from P=ρIc2𝑃subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2P=-\rho_{I}c^{2}italic_P = - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT to a maximum positive value Pe/(ρIc2)=1/48subscript𝑃𝑒subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2148P_{e}/(\rho_{I}c^{2})=1/48italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) = 1 / 48 at ae/a1=71/4subscript𝑎𝑒subscript𝑎1superscript714a_{e}/a_{1}=7^{1/4}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 7 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ρe/ρI=1/8subscript𝜌𝑒subscript𝜌𝐼18\rho_{e}/\rho_{I}=1/8italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / 8 then decreases to zero. The pressure vanishes when aw/a1=31/4subscript𝑎𝑤subscript𝑎1superscript314a_{w}/a_{1}=3^{1/4}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ρw/ρI=1/4subscript𝜌𝑤subscript𝜌𝐼14\rho_{w}/\rho_{I}=1/4italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / 4. There is no initial singularity (no big bang). The universe exists from the infinite past and the scale factor tends to zero when t𝑡t\rightarrow-\inftyitalic_t → - ∞. The temporal evolution of the scale factor a(t)𝑎𝑡a(t)italic_a ( italic_t ) is given analytically (in reversed form) by chavanisAIP ; jgrav ; cosmopoly1 ; universe ; chavanisIOP ; vacuumon :

(a/a1)4+1ln(1+(a/a1)4+1(a/a1)2)=2(8π3)1/2ttI+C.superscript𝑎subscript𝑎1411superscript𝑎subscript𝑎141superscript𝑎subscript𝑎122superscript8𝜋312𝑡subscript𝑡𝐼𝐶\sqrt{(a/a_{1})^{4}+1}-\ln\left(\frac{1+\sqrt{(a/a_{1})^{4}+1}}{(a/a_{1})^{2}}% \right)=2\left(\frac{8\pi}{3}\right)^{1/2}\frac{t}{t_{I}}+C.square-root start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 end_ARG - roman_ln ( divide start_ARG 1 + square-root start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) = 2 ( divide start_ARG 8 italic_π end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_t end_ARG start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG + italic_C . (101)

The constant is given by C1ln2+2lnϵsimilar-to-or-equals𝐶122italic-ϵC\simeq 1-\ln 2+2\ln\epsilonitalic_C ≃ 1 - roman_ln 2 + 2 roman_ln italic_ϵ, where ϵa(t=0)/a11italic-ϵ𝑎𝑡0subscript𝑎1much-less-than1\epsilon\equiv a(t=0)/a_{1}\ll 1italic_ϵ ≡ italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ 1. The value of ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ will be determined in Sec. VII.5. The evolution of the temperature is discussed in chavanisAIP ; jgrav ; cosmopoly1 ; chavanisIOP . We refer to Figs. 11-17 of cosmopoly1 for an illustration of these results.

The equation of state parameter w=P/(ρc2)𝑤𝑃𝜌superscript𝑐2w=P/(\rho c^{2})italic_w = italic_P / ( italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) is given by

w=4ρ3ρI+13=13(a/a1)41(a/a1)4+1.𝑤4𝜌3subscript𝜌𝐼1313superscript𝑎subscript𝑎141superscript𝑎subscript𝑎141w=-\frac{4\rho}{3\rho_{I}}+\frac{1}{3}=\frac{\frac{1}{3}(a/a_{1})^{4}-1}{(a/a_% {1})^{4}+1}.italic_w = - divide start_ARG 4 italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG 3 italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG = divide start_ARG divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 end_ARG . (102)

The pressure vanishes when aw/a1=31/4subscript𝑎𝑤subscript𝑎1superscript314a_{w}/a_{1}=3^{1/4}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ρw/ρI=1/4subscript𝜌𝑤subscript𝜌𝐼14\rho_{w}/\rho_{I}=1/4italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / 4.

The deceleration parameter is given by

q=12ρρI=(a/a1)41(a/a1)4+1.𝑞12𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑎subscript𝑎141superscript𝑎subscript𝑎141q=1-\frac{2\rho}{\rho_{I}}=\frac{(a/a_{1})^{4}-1}{(a/a_{1})^{4}+1}.italic_q = 1 - divide start_ARG 2 italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 end_ARG . (103)

The universe is accelerating when a<ac𝑎subscript𝑎𝑐a<a_{c}italic_a < italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and decelerating when a>ac𝑎subscript𝑎𝑐a>a_{c}italic_a > italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with ac/a1=1subscript𝑎𝑐subscript𝑎11a_{c}/a_{1}=1italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 and ρc/ρI=1/2subscript𝜌𝑐subscript𝜌𝐼12\rho_{c}/\rho_{I}=1/2italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / 2. Therefore, acsubscript𝑎𝑐a_{c}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT marks the end of the early inflation. We note that ac=a1subscript𝑎𝑐subscript𝑎1a_{c}=a_{1}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

The squared speed of sound cs2=dP/dρsuperscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠2𝑑𝑃𝑑𝜌c_{s}^{2}=dP/d\rhoitalic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_d italic_P / italic_d italic_ρ is given by

cs2c2=8ρ3ρI+13=13(a/a1)473(a/a1)4+1.superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠2superscript𝑐28𝜌3subscript𝜌𝐼1313superscript𝑎subscript𝑎1473superscript𝑎subscript𝑎141\frac{c_{s}^{2}}{c^{2}}=-\frac{8\rho}{3\rho_{I}}+\frac{1}{3}=\frac{\frac{1}{3}% (a/a_{1})^{4}-\frac{7}{3}}{(a/a_{1})^{4}+1}.divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = - divide start_ARG 8 italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG 3 italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG = divide start_ARG divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 7 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 end_ARG . (104)

The speed of sound is imaginary (cs2<0superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠20c_{s}^{2}<0italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < 0) when a<ae𝑎subscript𝑎𝑒a<a_{e}italic_a < italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and real (cs2>0superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠20c_{s}^{2}>0italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 0) when a>ae𝑎subscript𝑎𝑒a>a_{e}italic_a > italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with ae/a1=71/4subscript𝑎𝑒subscript𝑎1superscript714a_{e}/a_{1}=7^{1/4}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 7 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ρe/ρI=1/8subscript𝜌𝑒subscript𝜌𝐼18\rho_{e}/\rho_{I}=1/8italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / 8 (this is the point where the pressure reaches its maximum value Pesubscript𝑃𝑒P_{e}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT so that cs2=dP/dρ=0superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠2𝑑𝑃𝑑𝜌0c_{s}^{2}=dP/d\rho=0italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_d italic_P / italic_d italic_ρ = 0). When it is real, the speed of sound is always less than the speed of light.

As the universe expands from a=0𝑎0a=0italic_a = 0 to a=+𝑎a=+\inftyitalic_a = + ∞, the equation of state parameter w𝑤witalic_w increases from 11-1- 1 to 1/3131/31 / 3, the deceleration parameter q𝑞qitalic_q increases from 11-1- 1 to 1111 and the ratio (cs/c)2superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠𝑐2(c_{s}/c)^{2}( italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_c ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT increases from 7/373-7/3- 7 / 3 to 1/3131/31 / 3 (see Fig. 6 of cosmopoly1 ).

Remark: The foregoing results can be directly obtained from the Lagrangian (79). We have the relation

=B22=ρIc2(a/a1)4,superscript𝐵22subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2superscript𝑎subscript𝑎14{\cal F}=\frac{B^{2}}{2}=\frac{\rho_{I}c^{2}}{(a/a_{1})^{4}},caligraphic_F = divide start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (105)

which can be obtained by comparing Eq. (97) with Eqs. (80) and (81) or by comparing Eq. (98) with Eq. (69) in the radiation era. The results can be therefore expressed in terms of /ρIc2subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2{\cal F}/\rho_{I}c^{2}caligraphic_F / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT or B2/2ρIc2superscript𝐵22subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2B^{2}/2\rho_{I}c^{2}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT instead of a/a1𝑎subscript𝑎1a/a_{1}italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT by using Eq. (105). Applying Eq. (105) at the present epoch (a=1𝑎1a=1italic_a = 1) we find that

a1=(0ρIc2)1/4,subscript𝑎1superscriptsubscript0subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐214a_{1}=\left(\frac{{\cal F}_{0}}{\rho_{I}c^{2}}\right)^{1/4},italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (106)

which is the same as Eq. (100) according to Eq. (67).

VII.5 e𝑒eitalic_e-folding number and duration of the inflation

The e𝑒eitalic_e-folding number before inflation ends is defined by

N=ln(aca),𝑁subscript𝑎𝑐𝑎N=\ln\left(\frac{a_{c}}{a}\right),italic_N = roman_ln ( divide start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a end_ARG ) , (107)

where acsubscript𝑎𝑐a_{c}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the scale factor at the end of the inflation. It corresponds to q=0𝑞0q=0italic_q = 0 or w=1/3𝑤13w=-1/3italic_w = - 1 / 3. In this section, we take n=1𝑛1n=1italic_n = 1 and α=1/3𝛼13\alpha=1/3italic_α = 1 / 3 (radiation) for the reasons given in Sec. VI.2. In that case, using the results of Sec. VII.3, we have ρc=ρI/2subscript𝜌𝑐subscript𝜌𝐼2\rho_{c}={\rho_{I}}/{2}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 2 and ac=a1subscript𝑎𝑐subscript𝑎1a_{c}=a_{1}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, where a1subscript𝑎1a_{1}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is given by Eq. (100). The scale factor acsubscript𝑎𝑐a_{c}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at the end of the inflation coincides with the scale factor a1subscript𝑎1a_{1}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT marking the transition between the inflation era and the radiation era. To determine a1subscript𝑎1a_{1}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT we must specify the value of ρIsubscript𝜌𝐼\rho_{I}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. At that point we can have two positions:

(i) Model I: If we follow the arguments given in our previous papers cosmopoly1 ; universe , we would identify ρIsubscript𝜌𝐼\rho_{I}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with the Planck density ρP=c5/G2=5.16×1099gm3subscript𝜌𝑃superscript𝑐5superscript𝐺2Planck-constant-over-2-pi5.16superscript1099gsuperscriptm3\rho_{P}=c^{5}/G^{2}\hbar=5.16\times 10^{99}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ = 5.16 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 99 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (or a fraction of the Planck density). In other words, we assume that the maximum density of the universe (corresponding to the early inflation era) is the Planck density. In that case, taking ρ0=8.62×1024gm3subscript𝜌08.62superscript1024gsuperscriptm3\rho_{0}=8.62\times 10^{-24}{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 8.62 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 24 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for the present density of the universe, we get ΩP,0=5.98×10122subscriptΩ𝑃05.98superscript10122\Omega_{P,0}=5.98\times 10^{122}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5.98 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 122 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT leading to

a1=1.98×1032.subscript𝑎11.98superscript1032a_{1}=1.98\times 10^{-32}.italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.98 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 32 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (108)

On the other hand, we have argued in cosmopoly1 ; universe (see also Appendix E) that

ϵa(t=0)a1=1.71×1030.italic-ϵ𝑎𝑡0subscript𝑎11.71superscript1030\epsilon\equiv\frac{a(t=0)}{a_{1}}=1.71\times 10^{-30}.italic_ϵ ≡ divide start_ARG italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 1.71 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 30 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (109)

Therefore, a(t=0)=3.39×1062𝑎𝑡03.39superscript1062a(t=0)=3.39\times 10^{-62}italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) = 3.39 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 62 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. From the above results, we obtain vacuumon

N0=ln[aca(t=0)]=ln[a1a(t=0)]=ln(1ϵ)=68.5.subscript𝑁0subscript𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑡0subscript𝑎1𝑎𝑡01italic-ϵ68.5N_{0}=\ln\left[\frac{a_{c}}{a(t=0)}\right]=\ln\left[\frac{a_{1}}{a(t=0)}\right% ]=\ln\left(\frac{1}{\epsilon}\right)=68.5.italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_ln [ divide start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) end_ARG ] = roman_ln [ divide start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) end_ARG ] = roman_ln ( divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_ϵ end_ARG ) = 68.5 . (110)

This value is consistent with the value N65similar-to-or-equals𝑁65N\simeq 65italic_N ≃ 65 deduced from the observations in order to solve the horizon and flatness problems liddlelyth . On the other hand, the duration tcsubscript𝑡𝑐t_{c}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of the inflation can be evaluated by substituting a=ac=a1𝑎subscript𝑎𝑐subscript𝑎1a=a_{c}=a_{1}italic_a = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT into Eq. (101) giving

2ln(1+2)=2(8π3)1/2tctP+C,2122superscript8𝜋312subscript𝑡𝑐subscript𝑡𝑃𝐶\sqrt{2}-\ln(1+\sqrt{2})=2\left(\frac{8\pi}{3}\right)^{1/2}\frac{t_{c}}{t_{P}}% +C,square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG - roman_ln ( 1 + square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG ) = 2 ( divide start_ARG 8 italic_π end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG + italic_C , (111)

where C=1ln(2)+2lnϵ=137𝐶122italic-ϵ137C=1-\ln(2)+2\ln\epsilon=-137italic_C = 1 - roman_ln ( 2 ) + 2 roman_ln italic_ϵ = - 137 and tP=1/(GρP)1/2=(G/c5)1/2=5.39×1044ssubscript𝑡𝑃1superscript𝐺subscript𝜌𝑃12superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi𝐺superscript𝑐5125.39superscript1044st_{P}=1/(G\rho_{P})^{1/2}=(\hbar G/c^{5})^{1/2}=5.39\times 10^{-44}\,{\rm s}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / ( italic_G italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( roman_ℏ italic_G / italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 5.39 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 44 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s is the Planck time. This gives tc=23.8tP=1.28×1042ssubscript𝑡𝑐23.8subscript𝑡𝑃1.28superscript1042st_{c}=23.8\,t_{P}=1.28\times 10^{-42}\,{\rm s}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 23.8 italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.28 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 42 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s. Therefore, in model I, the duration of the early inflation is of the order of the Planck time tPsubscript𝑡𝑃t_{P}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

(ii) Model II: If we follow the arguments based on nonlinear electrodynamics given by Kruglov kruglov2015a and in Sec. XI, we should identify ρIsubscript𝜌𝐼\rho_{I}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with the electron density ρe=me/re3=4.07×1016gm3subscript𝜌𝑒subscript𝑚𝑒superscriptsubscript𝑟𝑒34.07superscript1016gsuperscriptm3\rho_{e}={m_{e}}/{r_{e}^{3}}=4.07\times 10^{16}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 4.07 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 16 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (a more precise value would be ρ=0.0307ρe=1.25×1015gm3subscript𝜌0.0307subscript𝜌𝑒1.25superscript1015gsuperscriptm3\rho_{*}=0.0307\rho_{e}=1.25\times 10^{15}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.0307 italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.25 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT but it is convenient for the discussion to take ρesubscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{e}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT). In other words, the maximum density of the universe (corresponding to the early inflation era) is connected to the electron density, not to the Planck density. In that case, we get Ωe,0=4.72×1039subscriptΩ𝑒04.72superscript1039\Omega_{e,0}=4.72\times 10^{39}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4.72 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 39 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT leading to

a1=1.18×1011.subscript𝑎11.18superscript1011a_{1}=1.18\times 10^{-11}.italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.18 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (112)

On the other hand, Kruglov kruglov2020 takes ϵa(t=0)/a1=6.5×1028italic-ϵ𝑎𝑡0subscript𝑎16.5superscript1028\epsilon\equiv{a(t=0)}/{a_{1}}=6.5\times 10^{-28}italic_ϵ ≡ italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 6.5 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 28 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. This value is consistent with Eq. (109). As discussed in Appendix E, it is convenient to determine a(t=0)𝑎𝑡0a(t=0)italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) in model II such that ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ has the value given by Eq. (109). This gives a(t=0)=2.10×1041𝑎𝑡02.10superscript1041a(t=0)=2.10\times 10^{-41}italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) = 2.10 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 41 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. In this manner, N0subscript𝑁0N_{0}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT has the same value N0=68.5subscript𝑁068.5N_{0}=68.5italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 68.5 in the two models and this simplifies the comparison. Repeating the arguments given after Eq. (110), we find that the duration tcsubscript𝑡𝑐t_{c}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of the early inflation in model II is given by tc=23.8te=0.457ssubscript𝑡𝑐23.8superscriptsubscript𝑡𝑒0.457st_{c}=23.8\,t_{e}^{*}=0.457\,{\rm s}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 23.8 italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.457 roman_s, where te=1/Gρe=0.0192ssuperscriptsubscript𝑡𝑒1𝐺subscript𝜌𝑒0.0192st_{e}^{*}=1/\sqrt{G\rho_{e}}=0.0192\,{\rm s}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1 / square-root start_ARG italic_G italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 0.0192 roman_s is a timescale constructed with the density of the electron (instead of the Planck density).999With the value ϵa(t=0)/a1=6.5×1028italic-ϵ𝑎𝑡0subscript𝑎16.5superscript1028\epsilon\equiv{a(t=0)}/{a_{1}}=6.5\times 10^{-28}italic_ϵ ≡ italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 6.5 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 28 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, Kruglov kruglov2020 finds that the inflation lasts approximately 2222 s with the reasonable e𝑒eitalic_e-folding number N63similar-to-or-equals𝑁63N\simeq 63italic_N ≃ 63. It corresponds to the dynamical time of a self-gravitating system of density ρesubscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{e}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT btnew . We shall call it the gravitoelectronic time. In model II, the duration of the early inflation is of the order of tesuperscriptsubscript𝑡𝑒t_{e}^{*}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

In conclusion, in model II based on nonlinear electrodynamics where ρIρesimilar-tosubscript𝜌𝐼subscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{I}\sim\rho_{e}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the inflation is much longer (1ssimilar-toabsent1s\sim 1\,{\rm s}∼ 1 roman_s) than in model I where ρIρPsimilar-tosubscript𝜌𝐼subscript𝜌𝑃\rho_{I}\sim\rho_{P}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT giving tc1.28×1042ssimilar-tosubscript𝑡𝑐1.28superscript1042st_{c}\sim 1.28\times 10^{-42}\,{\rm s}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 1.28 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 42 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s. This is because ρe1080ρPρPsimilar-tosubscript𝜌𝑒superscript1080subscript𝜌𝑃much-less-thansubscript𝜌𝑃\rho_{e}\sim 10^{-80}\rho_{P}\ll\rho_{P}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 80 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ouf . It would be interesting to know if cosmological constraints on the duration of the inflation (or on the density of the primordial universe) are able to discriminate between the two models.

Remark: We can have a more direct estimate of the duration of the inflation by applying the very accurate approximate formula aa(t=0)e(8π/3)1/2t/tIsimilar-to-or-equals𝑎𝑎𝑡0superscript𝑒superscript8𝜋312𝑡subscript𝑡𝐼a\simeq a(t=0)e^{(8\pi/3)^{1/2}t/t_{I}}italic_a ≃ italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 8 italic_π / 3 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t / italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT at a=a1=ac𝑎subscript𝑎1subscript𝑎𝑐a=a_{1}=a_{c}italic_a = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT cosmopoly1 ; universe , giving

tc=(38π)1/2ln(1ϵ)tI23.7tI.subscript𝑡𝑐superscript38𝜋121italic-ϵsubscript𝑡𝐼similar-to-or-equals23.7subscript𝑡𝐼t_{c}=\left(\frac{3}{8\pi}\right)^{1/2}\ln\left(\frac{1}{\epsilon}\right)t_{I}% \simeq 23.7\,t_{I}.italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_π end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ln ( divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_ϵ end_ARG ) italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ 23.7 italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (113)

VIII Nonlinear electrodynamics based on the Lagrangian =ΛsubscriptΛ{\cal L}=-{\cal F}-{\cal F}_{\Lambda}caligraphic_L = - caligraphic_F - caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT: Cosmology in the late universe

In the late universe, we consider a nonlinear electrodynamics based on the Lagrangian

=Λ,subscriptΛ{\cal L}=-{\cal F}-{\cal F}_{\Lambda},caligraphic_L = - caligraphic_F - caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (114)

where Λ=ρΛc2subscriptΛsubscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2{\cal F}_{\Lambda}=\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. We suggest that DE corresponds to the zero-point radiation energy that manifests itself as a constant term in the electromagnetic Lagrangian. We identify this constant with the cosmological density ρΛ=Λc2/8πG=5.96×1024gm3subscript𝜌ΛΛsuperscript𝑐28𝜋𝐺5.96superscript1024gsuperscriptm3\rho_{\Lambda}=\Lambda c^{2}/8\pi G=5.96\times 10^{-24}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_Λ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 8 italic_π italic_G = 5.96 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 24 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. In this model, the late acceleration of the universe is due to the electromagnetic energy of point zero. From Eqs. (55) and (56) we find that the energy density and the pressure are given by

ρc2=+ρΛc2,𝜌superscript𝑐2subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2\rho c^{2}={\cal F}+\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2},italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = caligraphic_F + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (115)
P=13ρΛc2.𝑃13subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P=\frac{1}{3}{\cal F}-\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}.italic_P = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG caligraphic_F - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (116)

Eliminating {\cal F}caligraphic_F between these two expressions we obtain the affine equation of state

P=13ρc243ρΛc2.𝑃13𝜌superscript𝑐243subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P=\frac{1}{3}\rho c^{2}-\frac{4}{3}\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}.italic_P = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 4 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (117)

This equation of state has been studied in cosmopoly2 ; universe to model the late universe. Below, we recall its main properties.

VIII.1 Generalized polytropic equation of state

For the sake of generality, we consider a generalized polytropic equation of state of the form

P=αρc2(α+1)ρΛc2(ρρI)11/|n|𝑃𝛼𝜌superscript𝑐2𝛼1subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2superscript𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼11𝑛P=\alpha\rho c^{2}-(\alpha+1)\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}\left(\frac{\rho}{\rho_{I}}% \right)^{1-{1}/{|n|}}italic_P = italic_α italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_α + 1 ) italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 - 1 / | italic_n | end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (118)

with n<0𝑛0n<0italic_n < 0 and 1<α11𝛼1-1<\alpha\leq 1- 1 < italic_α ≤ 1 cosmopoly2 ; universe , even if we shall finally take α=1/3𝛼13\alpha=1/3italic_α = 1 / 3 and n=1𝑛1n=-1italic_n = - 1 for the reasons explained in Sec. VI.2. For ρρΛmuch-greater-than𝜌subscript𝜌Λ\rho\gg\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ ≫ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we obtain the linear equation of state Pαρc2similar-to𝑃𝛼𝜌superscript𝑐2P\sim\alpha\rho c^{2}italic_P ∼ italic_α italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. For ρρΛ𝜌subscript𝜌Λ\rho\rightarrow\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ → italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we get PρΛc2𝑃subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P\rightarrow-\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}italic_P → - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT corresponding to the equation of state of dark energy.

Remark: The equation of state (118) in the late universe can be viewed as the “symmetric” version of the equation of state (83) in the early universe. The symmetrical structure of the equation of state in the early (n>0𝑛0n>0italic_n > 0) and late (n<0𝑛0n<0italic_n < 0) universe is developed in chavanisAIP ; cosmopoly1 ; cosmopoly2 .

VIII.2 Evolution of the density, pressure and scale factor

Solving the energy conservation equation (27) with the equation of state (118) we find that the energy density evolves with the scale factor as

ρ=ρΛ[1+1(a/a2)3(1+α)|n|]|n|,𝜌subscript𝜌Λsuperscriptdelimited-[]11superscript𝑎subscript𝑎231𝛼𝑛𝑛\rho=\rho_{\Lambda}\left[1+\frac{1}{(a/a_{2})^{\frac{3(1+\alpha)}{|n|}}}\right% ]^{|n|},italic_ρ = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 1 + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) end_ARG start_ARG | italic_n | end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | italic_n | end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (119)

where a2subscript𝑎2a_{2}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a constant of integration. The pressure depends on the scale factor as

PρΛc2=[α(a/a2)3(α+1)|n|1][1(a/a2)3(α+1)|n|+1]|n|1.𝑃subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2delimited-[]𝛼superscript𝑎subscript𝑎23𝛼1𝑛1superscriptdelimited-[]1superscript𝑎subscript𝑎23𝛼1𝑛1𝑛1\frac{P}{\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}}=\left[\frac{\alpha}{(a/a_{2})^{\frac{3(\alpha+1)% }{|n|}}}-1\right]\left[\frac{1}{(a/a_{2})^{\frac{3(\alpha+1)}{|n|}}}+1\right]^% {|n|-1}.divide start_ARG italic_P end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = [ divide start_ARG italic_α end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG | italic_n | end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG - 1 ] [ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG | italic_n | end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + 1 ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | italic_n | - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (120)

For aa2much-greater-than𝑎subscript𝑎2a\gg a_{2}italic_a ≫ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the energy density is approximately constant

ρρΛ,similar-to-or-equals𝜌subscript𝜌Λ\rho\simeq\rho_{\Lambda},italic_ρ ≃ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (121)

and the pressure tends to PρΛc2𝑃subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P\rightarrow-\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}italic_P → - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT corresponding to DE. Here, ρΛsubscript𝜌Λ\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is unambiguously associated with the cosmological density ρΛsubscript𝜌Λ\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The Hubble parameter is constant, with value H=(8π/3)1/2tΛ1𝐻superscript8𝜋312superscriptsubscript𝑡Λ1H=(8\pi/3)^{1/2}t_{\Lambda}^{-1}italic_H = ( 8 italic_π / 3 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where tΛ=1/(GρΛ)1/2=(8π/Λc2)1/2=1.59×1018ssubscript𝑡Λ1superscript𝐺subscript𝜌Λ12superscript8𝜋Λsuperscript𝑐2121.59superscript1018st_{\Lambda}=1/(G\rho_{\Lambda})^{1/2}=(8\pi/\Lambda c^{2})^{1/2}=1.59\times 10% ^{18}\,{\rm s}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / ( italic_G italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( 8 italic_π / roman_Λ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1.59 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 18 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s is a characteristic time (cosmological time) associated with ρΛsubscript𝜌Λ\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This leads to a phase of late accelerating expansion (or late inflation) during which the scale factor increases exponentially rapidly with time as e(8π/3)1/2t/tΛsuperscript𝑒superscript8𝜋312𝑡subscript𝑡Λe^{(8\pi/3)^{1/2}t/t_{\Lambda}}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 8 italic_π / 3 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t / italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (late de Sitter era).

For aa2much-less-than𝑎subscript𝑎2a\ll a_{2}italic_a ≪ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the energy density decreases algebraically as

ρρΛa23(1+α)a3(1+α).similar-to𝜌subscript𝜌Λsuperscriptsubscript𝑎231𝛼superscript𝑎31𝛼\rho\sim\frac{\rho_{\Lambda}a_{2}^{3(1+\alpha)}}{a^{3(1+\alpha)}}.italic_ρ ∼ divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (122)

In that case, it behaves as an α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-fluid with a linear equation of state Pαρc2similar-to𝑃𝛼𝜌superscript𝑐2P\sim\alpha\rho c^{2}italic_P ∼ italic_α italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. This leads to an α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-era during which the scale factor increases algebraically rapidly with time as t2/[3(1+α)]superscript𝑡2delimited-[]31𝛼t^{2/[3(1+\alpha)]}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 / [ 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) ] end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and the density decreases as t2superscript𝑡2t^{-2}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The expansion of the universe is decelerating if α>1/3𝛼13\alpha>-1/3italic_α > - 1 / 3 and accelerating if α<1/3𝛼13\alpha<-1/3italic_α < - 1 / 3. We can write the energy density of the α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-fluid as

ρα=Ωα,0ρ0a3(1+α),subscript𝜌𝛼subscriptΩ𝛼0subscript𝜌0superscript𝑎31𝛼\rho_{\alpha}=\frac{\Omega_{\alpha,0}\rho_{0}}{a^{3(1+\alpha)}},italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (123)

where ρ0c2subscript𝜌0superscript𝑐2\rho_{0}c^{2}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the present energy density of the universe and Ωα,0subscriptΩ𝛼0\Omega_{\alpha,0}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the present fraction of the α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-fluid (e.g. radiation when α=1/3𝛼13\alpha=1/3italic_α = 1 / 3). Comparing Eq. (122) with Eq. (123) and introducing the present fraction of DE ΩΛ,0=ρΛ/ρ0subscriptΩΛ0subscript𝜌Λsubscript𝜌0\Omega_{\Lambda,0}=\rho_{\Lambda}/\rho_{0}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we get

a2=(Ωα,0ΩΛ,0)13(1+α).subscript𝑎2superscriptsubscriptΩ𝛼0subscriptΩΛ0131𝛼a_{2}=\left(\frac{\Omega_{\alpha,0}}{\Omega_{\Lambda,0}}\right)^{\frac{1}{3(1+% \alpha)}}.italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (124)

This relation determines the constant a2subscript𝑎2a_{2}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (we note that its value is independent of n𝑛nitalic_n). We have the relation a2=a1(ρI/ρΛ)13(1+α)subscript𝑎2subscript𝑎1superscriptsubscript𝜌𝐼subscript𝜌Λ131𝛼a_{2}=a_{1}\left({\rho_{I}}/{\rho_{\Lambda}}\right)^{\frac{1}{3(1+\alpha)}}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 ( 1 + italic_α ) end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. We can then rewrite Eq. (119) as

ρρ0=Ωα,0[1a3(α+1)|n|+(ΩΛ,0Ωα,0)1/|n|]|n|.𝜌subscript𝜌0subscriptΩ𝛼0superscriptdelimited-[]1superscript𝑎3𝛼1𝑛superscriptsubscriptΩΛ0subscriptΩ𝛼01𝑛𝑛\frac{\rho}{\rho_{0}}=\Omega_{\alpha,0}\left[\frac{1}{a^{\frac{3(\alpha+1)}{|n% |}}}+\left(\frac{\Omega_{\Lambda,0}}{\Omega_{\alpha,0}}\right)^{1/|n|}\right]^% {|n|}.divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG | italic_n | end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / | italic_n | end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | italic_n | end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (125)

The equation of state (118) thus describes the smooth transition between an α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-era and a phase of accelerating expansion (DE or inflation) in the late universe. The characteristic scale a2subscript𝑎2a_{2}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT marks the transition between the α𝛼\alphaitalic_α-era and the dark energy (de Sitter) era. At a=a2𝑎subscript𝑎2a=a_{2}italic_a = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we have ρ2=2|n|ρΛsubscript𝜌2superscript2𝑛subscript𝜌Λ\rho_{2}=2^{|n|}\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | italic_n | end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and P2=(α1)2|n|1ρΛc2subscript𝑃2𝛼1superscript2𝑛1subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P_{2}=(\alpha-1)2^{|n|-1}\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( italic_α - 1 ) 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | italic_n | - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The equation of state (118) is studied in detail in cosmopoly2 ; universe . The energy density decreases monotonically from ++\infty+ ∞ to ρΛsubscript𝜌Λ\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The evolution of the pressure depends on the sign of α𝛼\alphaitalic_α. When α>0𝛼0\alpha>0italic_α > 0, the pressure decreases from ++\infty+ ∞ to P=ρΛc2𝑃subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P=-\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}italic_P = - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. It vanishes when aw/a2=α|n|/[3(α+1)]subscriptsuperscript𝑎𝑤subscript𝑎2superscript𝛼𝑛delimited-[]3𝛼1a^{\prime}_{w}/a_{2}=\alpha^{|n|/[3(\alpha+1)]}italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | italic_n | / [ 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) ] end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ρw/ρΛ=[(α+1)/α]|n|subscriptsuperscript𝜌𝑤subscript𝜌Λsuperscriptdelimited-[]𝛼1𝛼𝑛\rho^{\prime}_{w}/\rho_{\Lambda}=[(\alpha+1)/\alpha]^{|n|}italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ ( italic_α + 1 ) / italic_α ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | italic_n | end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. When α<0𝛼0\alpha<0italic_α < 0, the pressure increases from -\infty- ∞ to P=ρΛc2𝑃subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P=-\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}italic_P = - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. When α=0𝛼0\alpha=0italic_α = 0, the evolution of the pressure depends on the value of |n|𝑛|n|| italic_n |. When |n|>1𝑛1|n|>1| italic_n | > 1 the pressure increases from -\infty- ∞ to P=ρΛc2𝑃subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P=-\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}italic_P = - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, when |n|=1𝑛1|n|=1| italic_n | = 1 the pressure is constant P=ρΛc2𝑃subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P=-\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}italic_P = - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and when |n|<1𝑛1|n|<1| italic_n | < 1 the pressure decreases from zero to P=ρΛc2𝑃subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P=-\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}italic_P = - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The pressure may present an extremum Pe/(ρΛc2)=α|n|+1(|n|)|n|/[(α+1)|n|(|n|+1)|n|+1]subscriptsuperscript𝑃𝑒subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2superscript𝛼𝑛1superscript𝑛𝑛delimited-[]superscript𝛼1𝑛superscript𝑛1𝑛1P^{\prime}_{e}/(\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2})=\alpha^{-|n|+1}(-|n|)^{-|n|}/[(\alpha+1)^% {-|n|}(-|n|+1)^{-|n|+1}]italic_P start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) = italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | italic_n | + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( - | italic_n | ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | italic_n | end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / [ ( italic_α + 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | italic_n | end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( - | italic_n | + 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | italic_n | + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] at the point ae/a2=[(α|n|+1)/(|n|α)]|n|/[3(α+1)]subscriptsuperscript𝑎𝑒subscript𝑎2superscriptdelimited-[]𝛼𝑛1𝑛𝛼𝑛delimited-[]3𝛼1a^{\prime}_{e}/a_{2}=[-(\alpha-|n|+1)/(|n|\alpha)]^{-|n|/[3(\alpha+1)]}italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ - ( italic_α - | italic_n | + 1 ) / ( | italic_n | italic_α ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | italic_n | / [ 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) ] end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ρe/ρΛ=[α|n|/((α+1)(|n|+1))]|n|subscriptsuperscript𝜌𝑒subscript𝜌Λsuperscriptdelimited-[]𝛼𝑛𝛼1𝑛1𝑛\rho^{\prime}_{e}/\rho_{\Lambda}=[-\alpha|n|/((\alpha+1)(-|n|+1))]^{-|n|}italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ - italic_α | italic_n | / ( ( italic_α + 1 ) ( - | italic_n | + 1 ) ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | italic_n | end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Its conditions of existence are detailed in cosmopoly2 . We refer to Figs. 1 and 2 of cosmopoly2 for an illustration of the previous results.

Remark: The temporal evolution of the scale factor a(t)𝑎𝑡a(t)italic_a ( italic_t ) is given in cosmopoly2 assuming that the late universe is described by a single fluid with the equation of state (118). However, in general, there are other fluids that also contribute to the density of the universe and therefore change the temporal evolution of the scale factor (see below). This is why we have not given its expression here.

VIII.3 Equation of state parameter and squared speed of sound

The equation of state parameter w=P/(ρc2)𝑤𝑃𝜌superscript𝑐2w=P/(\rho c^{2})italic_w = italic_P / ( italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) is given by

w=α(α+1)(ρΛρ)1/|n|.𝑤𝛼𝛼1superscriptsubscript𝜌Λ𝜌1𝑛w=\alpha-(\alpha+1)\left(\frac{\rho_{\Lambda}}{\rho}\right)^{1/|n|}.italic_w = italic_α - ( italic_α + 1 ) ( divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / | italic_n | end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (126)

Using Eq. (119) we get

w=α(a2/a)3(α+1)|n|1(a2/a)3(α+1)|n|+1.𝑤𝛼superscriptsubscript𝑎2𝑎3𝛼1𝑛1superscriptsubscript𝑎2𝑎3𝛼1𝑛1w=\frac{\alpha(a_{2}/a)^{\frac{3(\alpha+1)}{|n|}}-1}{(a_{2}/a)^{\frac{3(\alpha% +1)}{|n|}}+1}.italic_w = divide start_ARG italic_α ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG | italic_n | end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG | italic_n | end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 end_ARG . (127)

The pressure vanishes (w=0𝑤0w=0italic_w = 0) when aw/a2=α|n|/[3(α+1)]subscriptsuperscript𝑎𝑤subscript𝑎2superscript𝛼𝑛delimited-[]3𝛼1a^{\prime}_{w}/a_{2}=\alpha^{|n|/[3(\alpha+1)]}italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | italic_n | / [ 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) ] end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ρw/ρΛ=[(α+1)/α]|n|subscriptsuperscript𝜌𝑤subscript𝜌Λsuperscriptdelimited-[]𝛼1𝛼𝑛\rho^{\prime}_{w}/\rho_{\Lambda}=[(\alpha+1)/\alpha]^{|n|}italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ ( italic_α + 1 ) / italic_α ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | italic_n | end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (assuming α>0𝛼0\alpha>0italic_α > 0).

The squared speed of sound cs2=dP/dρsuperscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠2𝑑𝑃𝑑𝜌c_{s}^{2}=dP/d\rhoitalic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_d italic_P / italic_d italic_ρ is given by

cs2c2=(α+1)(11|n|)(ρΛρ)1/|n|+α.superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠2superscript𝑐2𝛼111𝑛superscriptsubscript𝜌Λ𝜌1𝑛𝛼\frac{c_{s}^{2}}{c^{2}}=-(\alpha+1)\left(1-\frac{1}{|n|}\right)\left(\frac{% \rho_{\Lambda}}{\rho}\right)^{1/|n|}+\alpha.divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = - ( italic_α + 1 ) ( 1 - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG | italic_n | end_ARG ) ( divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / | italic_n | end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_α . (128)

Using Eq. (119) we get

cs2c2=α(a2/a)3(α+1)|n|+α|n|+1|n|(a2/a)3(α+1)|n|+1.superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠2superscript𝑐2𝛼superscriptsubscript𝑎2𝑎3𝛼1𝑛𝛼𝑛1𝑛superscriptsubscript𝑎2𝑎3𝛼1𝑛1\frac{c_{s}^{2}}{c^{2}}=\frac{\alpha(a_{2}/a)^{\frac{3(\alpha+1)}{|n|}}+\frac{% \alpha-|n|+1}{|n|}}{(a_{2}/a)^{\frac{3(\alpha+1)}{|n|}}+1}.divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_α ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG | italic_n | end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_α - | italic_n | + 1 end_ARG start_ARG | italic_n | end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG | italic_n | end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 end_ARG . (129)

The speed of sound may vanish at the point ae/a2=[(α|n|+1)/(|n|α)]|n|/[3(α+1)]subscriptsuperscript𝑎𝑒subscript𝑎2superscriptdelimited-[]𝛼𝑛1𝑛𝛼𝑛delimited-[]3𝛼1a^{\prime}_{e}/a_{2}=[-(\alpha-|n|+1)/(|n|\alpha)]^{-|n|/[3(\alpha+1)]}italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ - ( italic_α - | italic_n | + 1 ) / ( | italic_n | italic_α ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | italic_n | / [ 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) ] end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ρe/ρΛ=[α|n|/((α+1)(|n|+1))]|n|subscriptsuperscript𝜌𝑒subscript𝜌Λsuperscriptdelimited-[]𝛼𝑛𝛼1𝑛1𝑛\rho^{\prime}_{e}/\rho_{\Lambda}=[-\alpha|n|/((\alpha+1)(-|n|+1))]^{-|n|}italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ - italic_α | italic_n | / ( ( italic_α + 1 ) ( - | italic_n | + 1 ) ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | italic_n | end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. This is the point where the pressure is extremum. The speed of sound may equal the speed of light at the point as/a2=[(α2|n|+1)/(|n|(1α))]|n|/[3(α+1)]subscriptsuperscript𝑎𝑠subscript𝑎2superscriptdelimited-[]𝛼2𝑛1𝑛1𝛼𝑛delimited-[]3𝛼1a^{\prime}_{s}/a_{2}=[(\alpha-2|n|+1)/(|n|(1-\alpha))]^{-|n|/[3(\alpha+1)]}italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ ( italic_α - 2 | italic_n | + 1 ) / ( | italic_n | ( 1 - italic_α ) ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | italic_n | / [ 3 ( italic_α + 1 ) ] end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ρs/ρΛ=[(1α)|n|/((α+1)(|n|+1))]|n|subscriptsuperscript𝜌𝑠subscript𝜌Λsuperscriptdelimited-[]1𝛼𝑛𝛼1𝑛1𝑛\rho^{\prime}_{s}/\rho_{\Lambda}=[(1-\alpha)|n|/((\alpha+1)(-|n|+1))]^{-|n|}italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ ( 1 - italic_α ) | italic_n | / ( ( italic_α + 1 ) ( - | italic_n | + 1 ) ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | italic_n | end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The conditions of existence of these two points are detailed in cosmopoly2 .

As the universe expands from a=0𝑎0a=0italic_a = 0 to a=+𝑎a=+\inftyitalic_a = + ∞, the equation of state parameter w𝑤witalic_w evolves from α𝛼\alphaitalic_α to 11-1- 1 and the squared speed of sound cs2/c2superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠2superscript𝑐2c_{s}^{2}/c^{2}italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT evolves from α𝛼\alphaitalic_α to (α|n|+1)/|n|𝛼𝑛1𝑛(\alpha-|n|+1)/|n|( italic_α - | italic_n | + 1 ) / | italic_n | (see Fig. 5 of cosmopoly2 for an illustration).

Remark: For the reason explained previously we have not given the deceleration parameter because its value may be affected by other fluids.

VIII.4 Application to the radiation

In this section, we specifically apply the preceding results to the case n=1𝑛1n=-1italic_n = - 1 and α=1/3𝛼13\alpha=1/3italic_α = 1 / 3 (radiation). This corresponds to the equation of state (117). It can be viewed as the “symmetric” version of the equation of state (82) in the early universe chavanisAIP ; cosmopoly1 ; cosmopoly2 . For ρρΛmuch-greater-than𝜌subscript𝜌Λ\rho\gg\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ ≫ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we recover the linear equation of state of radiation Pρc2/3similar-to𝑃𝜌superscript𝑐23P\sim\rho c^{2}/3italic_P ∼ italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 3. For ρρΛ𝜌subscript𝜌Λ\rho\rightarrow\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ → italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we get PρΛc2𝑃subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P\rightarrow-\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}italic_P → - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT corresponding to dark energy. The energy density and the pressure evolve with the scale factor as

ρ=ρΛ[1+1(a/a2)4],PρΛc2=13(a/a2)41.formulae-sequence𝜌subscript𝜌Λdelimited-[]11superscript𝑎subscript𝑎24𝑃subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐213superscript𝑎subscript𝑎241\rho=\rho_{\Lambda}\left[1+\frac{1}{(a/a_{2})^{4}}\right],\qquad\frac{P}{\rho_% {\Lambda}c^{2}}=\frac{1}{3(a/a_{2})^{4}}-1.italic_ρ = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 1 + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ] , divide start_ARG italic_P end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG - 1 . (130)

For aa2much-greater-than𝑎subscript𝑎2a\gg a_{2}italic_a ≫ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the energy density is approximately constant with value ρρΛsimilar-to-or-equals𝜌subscript𝜌Λ\rho\simeq\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ ≃ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and the pressure tends to PρΛc2𝑃subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P\rightarrow-\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}italic_P → - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT corresponding to DE. This leads to a phase of late accelerating expansion (or late inflation) during which the scale factor increases exponentially rapidly with time as e(8π/3)1/2t/tΛsuperscript𝑒superscript8𝜋312𝑡subscript𝑡Λe^{(8\pi/3)^{1/2}t/t_{\Lambda}}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 8 italic_π / 3 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t / italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (late de Sitter era). For aa2much-less-than𝑎subscript𝑎2a\ll a_{2}italic_a ≪ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the energy density decreases algebraically as

ρρΛa24a4,similar-to𝜌subscript𝜌Λsuperscriptsubscript𝑎24superscript𝑎4\rho\sim\frac{\rho_{\Lambda}a_{2}^{4}}{a^{4}},italic_ρ ∼ divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (131)

corresponding to the radiation with a linear equation of state Pρc2/3similar-to𝑃𝜌superscript𝑐23P\sim\rho c^{2}/3italic_P ∼ italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 3. During the radiation era, the scale factor increases algebraically rapidly with time as t1/2superscript𝑡12t^{1/2}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and the density decreases as t2superscript𝑡2t^{-2}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The expansion of the universe is decelerating. We can write the energy density of the radiation as

ρrad=Ωrad,0ρ0a4,subscript𝜌radsubscriptΩrad0subscript𝜌0superscript𝑎4\rho_{\rm rad}=\frac{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}\rho_{0}}{a^{4}},italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (132)

where ρ0c2subscript𝜌0superscript𝑐2\rho_{0}c^{2}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the present energy density of the universe and Ωrad,0subscriptΩrad0\Omega_{\rm rad,0}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the present fraction of radiation.

The equation of state (117) describes the smooth transition between the radiation era and a phase of accelerating expansion (DE or inflation) in the late universe. The transition between the radiation era and the the dark energy (de Sitter) era takes place at

a2=(Ωrad,0ΩΛ,0)1/4.subscript𝑎2superscriptsubscriptΩrad0subscriptΩΛ014a_{2}=\left(\frac{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}}{\Omega_{\Lambda,0}}\right)^{1/4}.italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (133)

At a=a2𝑎subscript𝑎2a=a_{2}italic_a = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we have ρ2=2ρΛsubscript𝜌22subscript𝜌Λ\rho_{2}=2\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and P2=(2/3)ρΛc2subscript𝑃223subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P_{2}=-(2/3)\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - ( 2 / 3 ) italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The equation of state (118) is studied in detail in cosmopoly2 ; universe . The energy density decreases monotonically from ++\infty+ ∞ to ρΛsubscript𝜌Λ\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The pressure decreases monotonically from ++\infty+ ∞ to P=ρΛc2𝑃subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P=-\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}italic_P = - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. It vanishes when aw/a2=1/81subscriptsuperscript𝑎𝑤subscript𝑎2181a^{\prime}_{w}/a_{2}=1/81italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / 81 and ρw/ρΛ=4subscriptsuperscript𝜌𝑤subscript𝜌Λ4\rho^{\prime}_{w}/\rho_{\Lambda}=4italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4.

The equation of state parameter w=P/(ρc2)𝑤𝑃𝜌superscript𝑐2w=P/(\rho c^{2})italic_w = italic_P / ( italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) is given by

w=134ρΛ3ρ=13(a2/a)41(a2/a)4+1.𝑤134subscript𝜌Λ3𝜌13superscriptsubscript𝑎2𝑎41superscriptsubscript𝑎2𝑎41w=\frac{1}{3}-\frac{4\rho_{\Lambda}}{3\rho}=\frac{\frac{1}{3}(a_{2}/a)^{4}-1}{% (a_{2}/a)^{4}+1}.italic_w = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG - divide start_ARG 4 italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 3 italic_ρ end_ARG = divide start_ARG divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 end_ARG . (134)

The pressure vanishes when aw/a2=1/81subscriptsuperscript𝑎𝑤subscript𝑎2181a^{\prime}_{w}/a_{2}=1/81italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / 81 and ρw/ρΛ=4subscriptsuperscript𝜌𝑤subscript𝜌Λ4\rho^{\prime}_{w}/\rho_{\Lambda}=4italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4. As the universe expands from a=0𝑎0a=0italic_a = 0 to a=+𝑎a=+\inftyitalic_a = + ∞, the equation of state parameter w𝑤witalic_w decreases from 1/3131/31 / 3 to 11-1- 1.

The squared speed of sound cs2=dP/dρsuperscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠2𝑑𝑃𝑑𝜌c_{s}^{2}=dP/d\rhoitalic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_d italic_P / italic_d italic_ρ is given by

cs2c2=13.superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑠2superscript𝑐213\frac{c_{s}^{2}}{c^{2}}=\frac{1}{3}.divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG . (135)

The speed of sound is constant and equal to cs/c=1/3subscript𝑐𝑠𝑐13{c_{s}}/{c}=1/\sqrt{3}italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_c = 1 / square-root start_ARG 3 end_ARG. The speed of sound is less than the speed of light.

We will see in Sec. IX that ρ𝜌\rhoitalic_ρ given by Eq. (130) represents the density of generalized radiation in the late universe. For aa2much-less-than𝑎subscript𝑎2a\ll a_{2}italic_a ≪ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT it corresponds to the ordinary radiation. For aeqaa2much-less-thansubscript𝑎eq𝑎much-less-thansubscript𝑎2a_{\rm eq}\ll a\ll a_{2}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_a ≪ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (where aeqsubscript𝑎eqa_{\rm eq}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the value of the scale factor at radiation-matter equality) it is subdominant with respect to baryonic and dark matter viewed as different species. This is why we have not given the temporal evolution of the scale factor a(t)𝑎𝑡a(t)italic_a ( italic_t ) nor the deceleration parameter q(t)𝑞𝑡q(t)italic_q ( italic_t ) in this period because we have to take into account the contribution of matter. This is done in Sec. X where we present the complete model. By contrast, for a1aaeqmuch-less-thansubscript𝑎1𝑎much-less-thansubscript𝑎eqa_{1}\ll a\ll a_{\rm eq}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_a ≪ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT we are in the radiation era and for aa2much-greater-than𝑎subscriptsuperscript𝑎2a\gg a^{\prime}_{2}italic_a ≫ italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT we are in the dark energy era where the asymptotic results for a(t)𝑎𝑡a(t)italic_a ( italic_t ) given above are valid. In these limits, the deceleration parameter is given by Eq. (37).

Remark: The foregoing results can be directly obtained from the Lagrangian (114). We have the relation

=B22=ρΛc2(a/a2)4,superscript𝐵22subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2superscript𝑎subscript𝑎24{\cal F}=\frac{B^{2}}{2}=\frac{\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}}{(a/a_{2})^{4}},caligraphic_F = divide start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (136)

which can be obtained by comparing Eq. (130) with Eqs. (115) and (116) or by comparing Eq. (131) with Eq. (69) in the radiation era. The results can be therefore expressed in terms of /ρΛc2subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2{\cal F}/\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}caligraphic_F / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT or B2/2ρΛc2superscript𝐵22subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2B^{2}/2\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT instead of a/a2𝑎subscript𝑎2a/a_{2}italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT by using Eq. (136). Applying Eq. (136) at the present epoch (a=1𝑎1a=1italic_a = 1) we find that

a2=(0ρΛc2)1/4,subscript𝑎2superscriptsubscript0subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐214a_{2}=\left(\frac{{\cal F}_{0}}{\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}}\right)^{1/4},italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (137)

which is the same as Eq. (133) according to Eq. (67).

IX The Lagrangian of the generalized radiation

In Sec. VII we have considered a nonlinear electrodynamics based on a Lagrangian of the form

=1+ρIc21subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2{\cal L}=\frac{-{\cal F}}{1+\frac{{\cal F}}{\rho_{I}c^{2}}}caligraphic_L = divide start_ARG - caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG 1 + divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG (138)

with ρI=ρPsubscript𝜌𝐼subscript𝜌𝑃\rho_{I}=\rho_{P}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (model I) or ρI=ρesubscript𝜌𝐼subscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{I}=\rho_{e}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (model II). We have shown that this Lagrangian could describe the evolution of the early universe. In Sec. VIII we have considered a nonlinear electrodynamics based on a Lagrangian of the form

=ρΛc2.subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2{\cal L}=-{\cal F}-\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}.caligraphic_L = - caligraphic_F - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (139)

We have shown that this Lagrangian could describe the evolution of the late universe. We now want to connect these two Lagrangians in order to describe the complete evolution of the universe (see Sec. X). We see that there is a common period corresponding to I=ρIc2much-less-thansubscript𝐼subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2{\cal F}\ll{\cal F}_{I}=\rho_{I}c^{2}caligraphic_F ≪ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in the early universe and Λ=ρΛc2much-greater-thansubscriptΛsubscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2{\cal F}\gg{\cal F}_{\Lambda}=\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}caligraphic_F ≫ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in the late universe. In this common period, corresponding to the normal radiation era, the Lagrangians (138) and (139) reduce to Maxwell’s linear electrodynamics characterized by the Lagrangian

=.{\cal L}=-{\cal F}.caligraphic_L = - caligraphic_F . (140)

The Lagrangian of the nonlinear electrodynamics valid during the whole evolution of the universe is therefore

=1+ρIc2ρΛc2.1subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2{\cal L}=\frac{-{\cal F}}{1+\frac{{\cal F}}{\rho_{I}c^{2}}}-\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}.caligraphic_L = divide start_ARG - caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG 1 + divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (141)

In the early universe, it reduces to Eq. (138) and in the late universe it reduces to Eq. (139). In the intermediate period (radiation era), it returns the ordinary Maxwell electrodynamics (140).

From Eqs. (55) and (56) we find that the energy density and the pressure are given by

ρc2=1+ρIc2+ρΛc2,𝜌superscript𝑐21subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2\rho c^{2}=\frac{{\cal F}}{1+\frac{{\cal F}}{\rho_{I}c^{2}}}+\rho_{\Lambda}c^{% 2},italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG 1 + divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (142)
P=(13ρIc2)(1+ρIc2)2ρΛc2.𝑃13subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2superscript1subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐22subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P=\frac{{\cal F}\left(\frac{1}{3}-\frac{\cal F}{\rho_{I}c^{2}}\right)}{\left(1% +\frac{{\cal F}}{\rho_{I}c^{2}}\right)^{2}}-\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}.italic_P = divide start_ARG caligraphic_F ( divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG - divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (143)

Eliminating {\cal F}caligraphic_F between these two expressions we obtain in excellent approximation the quadratic equation of state101010To obtain this equation we have used the fact that ρP/ρΛ101201similar-tosubscript𝜌𝑃subscript𝜌Λsuperscript10120much-greater-than1\rho_{P}/\rho_{\Lambda}\sim 10^{120}\gg 1italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 120 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≫ 1 and ρe/ρΛ10401similar-tosubscript𝜌𝑒subscript𝜌Λsuperscript1040much-greater-than1\rho_{e}/\rho_{\Lambda}\sim 10^{40}\gg 1italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 40 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≫ 1. Since these dimensionless numbers are huge ouf , the approximation is quasi perfect.

P=4ρ23ρIc2+13ρc243ρΛc2.𝑃4superscript𝜌23subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐213𝜌superscript𝑐243subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2P=-\frac{4\rho^{2}}{3\rho_{I}}c^{2}+\frac{1}{3}\rho c^{2}-\frac{4}{3}\rho_{% \Lambda}c^{2}.italic_P = - divide start_ARG 4 italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 3 italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 4 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (144)

This equation of state (see Fig. 1) was introduced and studied in chavanisAIP ; jgrav ; cosmopoly1 ; cosmopoly2 ; cosmopoly3 ; universe ; stiff ; mlbec ; chavanisIOP ; vacuumon . In the early universe, we recover the quadratic equation of state (82) associated with the Lagrangian (138) and in the late universe we recover the affine equation of state (117) associated with the Lagrangian (139). In the intermediate period, we recover the linear equation of state P=13ρc2𝑃13𝜌superscript𝑐2P=\frac{1}{3}\rho c^{2}italic_P = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT of the ordinary radiation associated with Maxwell’s electrodynamics. Following the interpretation given in our previous works chavanisAIP ; jgrav ; cosmopoly1 ; cosmopoly2 ; cosmopoly3 ; universe ; stiff ; mlbec ; chavanisIOP ; vacuumon , the equation of state (144) describes a form of generalized radiation which is responsible for the early inflation, the normal radiation era and the present and late acceleration (dark energy) of the universe. In the present paper, we have connected this “generalized radiation” to a form of nonlinear electrodynamics. Solving the energy conservation equation (27) with the equation of state (144) we obtain in excellent approximation (see footnote 10) the following relation between the density of the generalized radiation and the scale factor chavanisAIP ; jgrav ; cosmopoly1 ; cosmopoly2 ; cosmopoly3 ; universe ; stiff ; mlbec ; chavanisIOP ; vacuumon :

ρRad=ρI1+(a/a1)4+ρΛ.subscript𝜌Radsubscript𝜌𝐼1superscript𝑎subscript𝑎14subscript𝜌Λ\rho_{\rm Rad}=\frac{\rho_{I}}{1+\left({a}/{a_{1}}\right)^{4}}+\rho_{\Lambda}.italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 1 + ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (145)

This is also the exact relation obtained from the Lagrangian (141) with Eq. (105) and (142). In the early universe, we recover the results of Sec. VII.4. In the late universe we recover the results of Sec. VIII.4. We stress that ρRadρradsubscript𝜌Radsubscript𝜌rad\rho_{\rm Rad}\neq\rho_{\rm rad}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≠ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in general. It is only in the intermediate period corresponding to Maxwell’s linear electrodynamics that the energy density of the generalized radiation ρRadsubscript𝜌Rad\rho_{\rm Rad}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT reduces to the energy density of the normal radiation ρradsubscript𝜌rad\rho_{\rm rad}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Equation of state of the generalized radiation [see Eq. (144)] associated with the Lagrangian (141). The pressure P𝑃Pitalic_P and the energy density ρc2𝜌superscript𝑐2\rho c^{2}italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are normalized by ρIc2subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2\rho_{I}c^{2}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

Remark: It is possible to find the exact relation ρRad(a)subscript𝜌Rad𝑎\rho_{\rm Rad}(a)italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_a ) determined by the equation of state (144). It is given in Appendix C of universe . Then, using Eqs. (55) and (105) we can obtain the exact Lagrangian (){\cal L}({\cal F})caligraphic_L ( caligraphic_F ) corresponding to the equation of state (144). Conversely, eliminating {\cal F}caligraphic_F between Eqs. (142) and (143) it is possible to obtain the exact equation of state corresponding to the Lagrangian (141). This equation of state exactly leads to the relation ρRad(a)subscript𝜌Rad𝑎\rho_{\rm Rad}(a)italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_a ) from Eq. (145). However, the approximate expressions given above are so accurate (see footnote 10) that this refinement is not necessary.

X Complete evolution of the universe

The Lagrangian (141) describes the generalized radiation. It accounts for the early inflation, the radiation era and the late acceleration of the universe. Baryonic matter and dark matter must be treated independently, as additional components. As a result, the total Lagrangian describing the mass-energy content of the universe is

=Rad+matter,subscriptRadsubscriptmatter\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}_{\rm Rad}+\mathcal{L}_{\rm matter},caligraphic_L = caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_matter end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (146)

where RadsubscriptRad\mathcal{L}_{\rm Rad}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the Lagrangian of the generalized radiation111111It is possible that there exist different forms of radiation. For example, a complex SF with a repulsive |φ|4superscript𝜑4|\varphi|^{4}| italic_φ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT self-interaction can behave like radiation becas . In that case, we should describe each form of radiation by a specific Lagrangian. However, for simplicity, we shall regroup all forms of radiation in the Lagrangian (141). and matter=b+dmsubscriptmattersubscriptbsubscriptdm\mathcal{L}_{\rm matter}={\cal L}_{\rm b}+{\cal L}_{\rm dm}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_matter end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_dm end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the Lagrangian of the baryonic and dark matter. The energy density of the generalized radiation is given by Eq. (145) with a1=(ρrad,0/ρI)1/4subscript𝑎1superscriptsubscript𝜌rad0subscript𝜌𝐼14a_{1}=(\rho_{\rm rad,0}/\rho_{I})^{1/4}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [see Eq. (100)]. If we assume for simplicity that baryonic matter and dark matter are pressureless (Pb=Pdm=0subscript𝑃bsubscript𝑃dm0P_{\rm b}=P_{\rm dm}=0italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_dm end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0),121212We could also consider a more general equation of state of the form P=αρc2𝑃𝛼𝜌superscript𝑐2P=\alpha\rho c^{2}italic_P = italic_α italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with α0similar-to-or-equals𝛼0\alpha\simeq 0italic_α ≃ 0 cosmopoly2 ; universe ; vacuumon . we find that their densities evolve with the scale factor as

ρb=ρb,0a3,ρdm=ρdm,0a3.formulae-sequencesubscript𝜌bsubscript𝜌b0superscript𝑎3subscript𝜌dmsubscript𝜌dm0superscript𝑎3\rho_{\rm b}=\frac{\rho_{\rm b,0}}{a^{3}},\qquad\rho_{\rm dm}=\frac{\rho_{\rm dm% ,0}}{a^{3}}.italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_b , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_dm end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_dm , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (147)

Therefore, the total energy density of the universe is

ρ=ρI1+(a/a1)4+ρb,0a3+ρdm,0a3+ρΛ.𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼1superscript𝑎subscript𝑎14subscript𝜌b0superscript𝑎3subscript𝜌dm0superscript𝑎3subscript𝜌Λ\rho=\frac{\rho_{I}}{1+({a}/{a_{1}})^{4}}+\frac{\rho_{\rm b,0}}{a^{3}}+\frac{% \rho_{\rm dm,0}}{a^{3}}+\rho_{\Lambda}.italic_ρ = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 1 + ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_b , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_dm , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (148)

It can be rewritten as

ρ=ρI1+ρIa4ρrad,0+ρb,0a3+ρdm,0a3+ρΛ.𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼1subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑎4subscript𝜌rad0subscript𝜌b0superscript𝑎3subscript𝜌dm0superscript𝑎3subscript𝜌Λ\rho=\frac{\rho_{I}}{1+\frac{\rho_{I}a^{4}}{\rho_{\rm rad,0}}}+\frac{\rho_{\rm b% ,0}}{a^{3}}+\frac{\rho_{\rm dm,0}}{a^{3}}+\rho_{\Lambda}.italic_ρ = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 1 + divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG + divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_b , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_dm , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (149)

This model can account for the whole evolution of the universe from the early inflation to its late accelerating expansion. It exhibits two de Sitter eras connected by a radiation era and a matter era. We detail these different periods below.

Remark: In this model there is no past singularity (no big bang) nor future singularity (no little or big rip).131313We have assumed a non-phantom evolution. See Ref. cosmopoly3 for cosmological models presenting a singular or peculiar late evolution (phantom models). The universe exists eternally in the past and in the future. The scale factor tends to zero when t𝑡t\rightarrow-\inftyitalic_t → - ∞ and to infinity when t+𝑡t\rightarrow+\inftyitalic_t → + ∞. It has been called the “aioniotic” universe cosmopoly1 ; cosmopoly2 .

X.1 Early universe: inflation + radiation

In the inflation + radiation era (early universe), the energy density of the universe is given by

ρ=ρI1+(a/a1)4𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼1superscript𝑎subscript𝑎14\rho=\frac{\rho_{I}}{1+({a}/{a_{1}})^{4}}italic_ρ = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 1 + ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG (150)

with a1=(Ωrad,0/ΩP,0)1/4=1.98×1032subscript𝑎1superscriptsubscriptΩrad0subscriptΩ𝑃0141.98superscript1032a_{1}=(\Omega_{\rm rad,0}/\Omega_{P,0})^{1/4}=1.98\times 10^{-32}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1.98 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 32 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT if ρI=ρPsubscript𝜌𝐼subscript𝜌𝑃\rho_{I}=\rho_{P}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and a1=(Ωrad,0/Ωe,0)1/4=1.18×1011subscript𝑎1superscriptsubscriptΩrad0subscriptΩ𝑒0141.18superscript1011a_{1}=(\Omega_{\rm rad,0}/\Omega_{e,0})^{1/4}=1.18\times 10^{-11}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1.18 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT if ρI=ρesubscript𝜌𝐼subscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{I}=\rho_{e}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. It can be rewritten as

ρ=ρI1+ρIa4ρrad,0.𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼1subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑎4subscript𝜌rad0\rho=\frac{\rho_{I}}{1+\frac{\rho_{I}a^{4}}{\rho_{\rm rad,0}}}.italic_ρ = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 1 + divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG . (151)

We recover the results detailed in Sec. VII. When aa1much-less-than𝑎subscript𝑎1a\ll a_{1}italic_a ≪ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we are in the inflation era. The density is approximately constant ρρIsimilar-to-or-equals𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼\rho\simeq\rho_{I}italic_ρ ≃ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This leads to a phase of early accelerating expansion (or early inflation) where the scale factor increases exponentially rapidly with time as e(8π/3)1/2t/tIsuperscript𝑒superscript8𝜋312𝑡subscript𝑡𝐼e^{(8\pi/3)^{1/2}t/t_{I}}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 8 italic_π / 3 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t / italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (early de Sitter era). The universe is accelerating. The transition between the radiation era and the matter era takes place at aeq=Ωrad,0/Ωm,0=3.00×104subscript𝑎eqsubscriptΩrad0subscriptΩm03.00superscript104a_{\rm eq}=\Omega_{\rm rad,0}/\Omega_{\rm m,0}=3.00\times 10^{-4}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3.00 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (see Sec. X.2). When a1aaeqmuch-less-thansubscript𝑎1𝑎much-less-thansubscript𝑎eqa_{1}\ll a\ll a_{\rm eq}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_a ≪ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we are in the ordinary radiation era described by the linear equation of state Prad=ρc2/3subscript𝑃rad𝜌superscript𝑐23P_{\rm rad}=\rho c^{2}/3italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 3. The density decreases algebraically as ρ=ρrad,0/a4𝜌subscript𝜌rad0superscript𝑎4\rho=\rho_{\rm rad,0}/a^{4}italic_ρ = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The scale factor increases algebraically with time as t1/2superscript𝑡12t^{1/2}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and the density decreases as t2superscript𝑡2t^{-2}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The universe is decelerating. We thus have a transition between a phase of accelerating expansion (vacuum energy/de Sitter) in the early universe and a phase of decelerating expansion in the radiation era. The transition takes place at aa1similar-to-or-equals𝑎subscript𝑎1a\simeq a_{1}italic_a ≃ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This transition between the inflation era and the radiation era is studied in detail in cosmopoly1 ; universe . The temporal evolution of the scale factor a(t)𝑎𝑡a(t)italic_a ( italic_t ) is given analytically (in reversed form) by

(a/a1)4+1ln(1+(a/a1)4+1(a/a1)2)=2(8π3)1/2ttI+Csuperscript𝑎subscript𝑎1411superscript𝑎subscript𝑎141superscript𝑎subscript𝑎122superscript8𝜋312𝑡subscript𝑡𝐼𝐶\sqrt{(a/a_{1})^{4}+1}-\ln\left(\frac{1+\sqrt{(a/a_{1})^{4}+1}}{(a/a_{1})^{2}}% \right)=2\left(\frac{8\pi}{3}\right)^{1/2}\frac{t}{t_{I}}+Csquare-root start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 end_ARG - roman_ln ( divide start_ARG 1 + square-root start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) = 2 ( divide start_ARG 8 italic_π end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_t end_ARG start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG + italic_C (152)

with C1ln2+2lnϵsimilar-to-or-equals𝐶122italic-ϵC\simeq 1-\ln 2+2\ln\epsilonitalic_C ≃ 1 - roman_ln 2 + 2 roman_ln italic_ϵ, where ϵ=a(t=0)/a1=1.71×1030italic-ϵ𝑎𝑡0subscript𝑎11.71superscript1030\epsilon=a(t=0)/a_{1}=1.71\times 10^{-30}italic_ϵ = italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.71 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 30 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (see Sec. VII.5). In the inflation era (aa1much-less-than𝑎subscript𝑎1a\ll a_{1}italic_a ≪ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT):

aa(t=0)e(8π/3)1/2t/tI,ρρI.formulae-sequencesimilar-to𝑎𝑎𝑡0superscript𝑒superscript8𝜋312𝑡subscript𝑡𝐼similar-to-or-equals𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼a\sim a(t=0)e^{(8\pi/3)^{1/2}t/t_{I}},\qquad\rho\simeq\rho_{I}.italic_a ∼ italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 8 italic_π / 3 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t / italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_ρ ≃ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (153)

In the radiation era (a1aaeqmuch-less-thansubscript𝑎1𝑎much-less-thansubscript𝑎eqa_{1}\ll a\ll a_{\rm eq}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_a ≪ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT):

a(2Ωrad,0H0t)1/2,ρρ01(2H0t)2,formulae-sequencesimilar-to𝑎superscript2subscriptΩrad0subscript𝐻0𝑡12similar-to𝜌subscript𝜌01superscript2subscript𝐻0𝑡2a\sim\left(2\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}}H_{0}t\right)^{1/2},\qquad\frac{\rho}{% \rho_{0}}\sim\frac{1}{\left(2H_{0}t\right)^{2}},italic_a ∼ ( 2 square-root start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∼ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (154)

where H0=(8πGρ0/3)1/2=2.195×1018s1subscript𝐻0superscript8𝜋𝐺subscript𝜌03122.195superscript1018superscripts1H_{0}=(8\pi G\rho_{0}/3)^{1/2}=2.195\times 10^{-18}\,{\rm s}^{-1}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( 8 italic_π italic_G italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 3 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 2.195 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 18 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the present value of the Hubble parameter.

X.2 Intermediate universe: radiation + matter

In the radiation + matter era (intermediate universe), the energy density of the universe evolves with the scale factor as

ρ=ρrad,0a4+ρm,0a3.𝜌subscript𝜌rad0superscript𝑎4subscript𝜌m0superscript𝑎3\rho=\frac{\rho_{\rm rad,0}}{a^{4}}+\frac{\rho_{\rm m,0}}{a^{3}}.italic_ρ = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (155)

If we normalize the density by its present value, we get

ρρ0=Ωrad,0a4+Ωm,0a3.𝜌subscript𝜌0subscriptΩrad0superscript𝑎4subscriptΩm0superscript𝑎3\frac{\rho}{\rho_{0}}=\frac{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}}{a^{4}}+\frac{\Omega_{\rm m,0}}% {a^{3}}.divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (156)

When aaeqmuch-less-than𝑎subscript𝑎eqa\ll a_{\rm eq}italic_a ≪ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we are in the ordinary radiation era described by a linear equation of state Prad=ρc2/3subscript𝑃rad𝜌superscript𝑐23P_{\rm rad}=\rho c^{2}/3italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 3. The density decreases algebraically as ρ=ρrad,0/a4𝜌subscript𝜌rad0superscript𝑎4\rho=\rho_{\rm rad,0}/a^{4}italic_ρ = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The scale factor increases algebraically with time as t1/2superscript𝑡12t^{1/2}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and the density decreases as t2superscript𝑡2t^{-2}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The universe is decelerating. When aaeqmuch-greater-than𝑎subscript𝑎eqa\gg a_{\rm eq}italic_a ≫ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we are in the matter era (Einstein-de Sitter) with a vanishing pressure Pm=0subscript𝑃m0P_{\rm m}=0italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0. The density decreases algebraically as ρ=ρm,0/a3𝜌subscript𝜌m0superscript𝑎3\rho=\rho_{\rm m,0}/a^{3}italic_ρ = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The scale factor increases algebraically with time as t2/3superscript𝑡23t^{2/3}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and the density decreases as t2superscript𝑡2t^{-2}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The universe is decelerating. We thus have a transition between two phases of decelerating expansion (radiation and matter). The transition takes place at aaeqsimilar-to-or-equals𝑎subscript𝑎eqa\simeq a_{\rm eq}italic_a ≃ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with

aeq=Ωrad,0Ωm,0=3.00×104.subscript𝑎eqsubscriptΩrad0subscriptΩm03.00superscript104a_{\rm eq}=\frac{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}}{\Omega_{\rm m,0}}=3.00\times 10^{-4}.italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 3.00 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (157)

We have taken Ωrad,0=9.23765×105subscriptΩrad09.23765superscript105\Omega_{\rm rad,0}=9.23765\times 10^{-5}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 9.23765 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and Ωm,0=0.3075subscriptΩm00.3075\Omega_{\rm m,0}=0.3075roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.3075. This transition between the radiation era and the matter era is studied in detail in stiff . The temporal evolution of the scale factor is given analytically (in reversed form) by

H0t=231(Ωm,0)1/2(2Ωrad,0Ωm,0a)Ωrad,0Ωm,0+a+43(Ωrad,0)3/2(Ωm,0)2.subscript𝐻0𝑡231superscriptsubscriptΩm0122subscriptΩrad0subscriptΩm0𝑎subscriptΩrad0subscriptΩm0𝑎43superscriptsubscriptΩrad032superscriptsubscriptΩm02\displaystyle H_{0}t=-\frac{2}{3}\frac{1}{(\Omega_{\rm m,0})^{1/2}}\left(\frac% {2\Omega_{\rm rad,0}}{\Omega_{\rm m,0}}-a\right)\sqrt{\frac{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}% }{\Omega_{\rm m,0}}+a}+\frac{4}{3}\frac{(\Omega_{\rm rad,0})^{3/2}}{(\Omega_{% \rm m,0})^{2}}.italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = - divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG 2 roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG - italic_a ) square-root start_ARG divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG + italic_a end_ARG + divide start_ARG 4 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG divide start_ARG ( roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (158)

It can also be written as

a33Ωrad,0Ωm,0a2=94Ωm,0H02t26Ωrad,03/2Ωm,0H0t.superscript𝑎33subscriptΩrad0subscriptΩm0superscript𝑎294subscriptΩm0superscriptsubscript𝐻02superscript𝑡26superscriptsubscriptΩrad032subscriptΩm0subscript𝐻0𝑡a^{3}-3\frac{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}}{\Omega_{\rm m,0}}a^{2}=\frac{9}{4}\Omega_{\rm m% ,0}H_{0}^{2}t^{2}-6\frac{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}^{3/2}}{\Omega_{\rm m,0}}H_{0}t.italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 9 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 6 divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t . (159)

This is a cubic equation for a𝑎aitalic_a which can be solved by standard methods. However, in order to plot the curve a(t)𝑎𝑡a(t)italic_a ( italic_t ), it is simpler to compute t(a)𝑡𝑎t(a)italic_t ( italic_a ) and represent a𝑎aitalic_a versus t𝑡titalic_t. In the radiation era we recover Eq. (154) and in the matter era we recover Eq. (165) given below.

X.3 Late universe: matter + dark energy (ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM)

In the matter + dark energy era (late universe), the energy density is given by

ρ=ρm,0a3+ρΛ.𝜌subscript𝜌m0superscript𝑎3subscript𝜌Λ\rho=\frac{\rho_{\rm m,0}}{a^{3}}+\rho_{\Lambda}.italic_ρ = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (160)

If we normalize the density by its present value, we get

ρρ0=Ωm,0a3+ΩΛ,0.𝜌subscript𝜌0subscriptΩm0superscript𝑎3subscriptΩΛ0\frac{\rho}{\rho_{0}}=\frac{\Omega_{\rm m,0}}{a^{3}}+\Omega_{\Lambda,0}.divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (161)

We recover the ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM model. We note that, in the present model, dark energy comes from the generalized radiation associated with nonlinear electrodynamics. It arises from the constant term in the Lagrangian (141) taking into account the electromagnetic energy of point zero. Introducing a2=(Ωm,0/ΩΛ,0)1/3=0.7634subscriptsuperscript𝑎2superscriptsubscriptΩm0subscriptΩΛ0130.7634a^{\prime}_{2}=(\Omega_{\rm m,0}/\Omega_{\Lambda,0})^{1/3}=0.7634italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.7634 (we have taken Ωm,0=0.3075subscriptΩm00.3075\Omega_{\rm m,0}=0.3075roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.3075 and ΩΛ,0=0.6911subscriptΩΛ00.6911\Omega_{\Lambda,0}=0.6911roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.6911), the relation between the energy density and the scale factor can be rewritten as

ρρΛ=1(a/a2)3+1.𝜌subscript𝜌Λ1superscript𝑎subscriptsuperscript𝑎231\frac{\rho}{\rho_{\Lambda}}=\frac{1}{(a/a^{\prime}_{2})^{3}}+1.divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + 1 . (162)

When aeqaa2much-less-thansubscript𝑎eq𝑎much-less-thansubscriptsuperscript𝑎2a_{\rm eq}\ll a\ll a^{\prime}_{2}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_a ≪ italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we are in the matter era (Einstein-de Sitter) with a vanishing pressure Pm=0subscript𝑃m0P_{\rm m}=0italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0. The density decreases algebraically as ρ=ρm,0/a3𝜌subscript𝜌m0superscript𝑎3\rho=\rho_{\rm m,0}/a^{3}italic_ρ = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The scale factor increases algebraically with time as t2/3superscript𝑡23t^{2/3}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and the density decreases as t2superscript𝑡2t^{-2}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The universe is decelerating. When aa2much-greater-than𝑎subscriptsuperscript𝑎2a\gg a^{\prime}_{2}italic_a ≫ italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we are in the dark energy era. The density is approximately constant ρρΛsimilar-to-or-equals𝜌subscript𝜌Λ\rho\simeq\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ ≃ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, equal to the cosmological density. This leads to a phase of late accelerating expansion (or late inflation) where the scale factor increases exponentially rapidly with time as e(8π/3)1/2t/tΛsuperscript𝑒superscript8𝜋312𝑡subscript𝑡Λe^{(8\pi/3)^{1/2}t/t_{\Lambda}}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 8 italic_π / 3 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t / italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (late de Sitter era). The universe is accelerating. We thus have a transition between a phase of decelerating expansion in the matter era (Einstein-de Sitter) and a phase of accelerating expansion (vacuum energy/de Sitter) in the late universe. The transition takes place at aa2similar-to-or-equals𝑎subscriptsuperscript𝑎2a\simeq a^{\prime}_{2}italic_a ≃ italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This transition between the matter era and the dark energy era is studied in detail in cosmopoly2 ; universe . The temporal evolution of the scale factor a(t)𝑎𝑡a(t)italic_a ( italic_t ) and density ρ(t)𝜌𝑡\rho(t)italic_ρ ( italic_t ) is given analytically by

aa2=sinh2/3[32(8π3)1/2ttΛ],ρρΛ=1tanh2[32(8π3)1/2ttΛ],formulae-sequence𝑎subscriptsuperscript𝑎2superscript2332superscript8𝜋312𝑡subscript𝑡Λ𝜌subscript𝜌Λ1superscript232superscript8𝜋312𝑡subscript𝑡Λ\frac{a}{a^{\prime}_{2}}=\sinh^{{2}/{3}}\left[\frac{3}{2}\left(\frac{8\pi}{3}% \right)^{1/2}\frac{t}{t_{\Lambda}}\right],\qquad\frac{\rho}{\rho_{\Lambda}}=% \frac{1}{\tanh^{2}\left[\frac{3}{2}\left(\frac{8\pi}{3}\right)^{1/2}\frac{t}{t% _{\Lambda}}\right]},divide start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = roman_sinh start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( divide start_ARG 8 italic_π end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_t end_ARG start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ] , divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG roman_tanh start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( divide start_ARG 8 italic_π end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_t end_ARG start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ] end_ARG , (163)

with tΛ=1/GρΛ=(8π/Λc2)1/2=1.59×1018ssubscript𝑡Λ1𝐺subscript𝜌Λsuperscript8𝜋Λsuperscript𝑐2121.59superscript1018st_{\Lambda}=1/\sqrt{G\rho_{\Lambda}}=(8\pi/\Lambda c^{2})^{1/2}=1.59\times 10^% {18}\,{\rm s}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / square-root start_ARG italic_G italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = ( 8 italic_π / roman_Λ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1.59 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 18 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s (cosmological time). It can also be written as

a=(Ωm,0ΩΛ,0)1/3sinh2/3(32ΩΛ,0H0t),ρρ0=ΩΛ,0tanh2(32ΩΛ,0H0t).formulae-sequence𝑎superscriptsubscriptΩ𝑚0subscriptΩΛ013superscript2332subscriptΩΛ0subscript𝐻0𝑡𝜌subscript𝜌0subscriptΩΛ0superscript232subscriptΩΛ0subscript𝐻0𝑡a=\left(\frac{\Omega_{m,0}}{\Omega_{\Lambda,0}}\right)^{1/3}\sinh^{{2}/{3}}% \left(\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{\Omega_{\Lambda,0}}H_{0}t\right),\qquad\frac{\rho}{\rho% _{0}}=\frac{\Omega_{\Lambda,0}}{\tanh^{2}\left(\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{\Omega_{% \Lambda,0}}H_{0}t\right)}.italic_a = ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_sinh start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG square-root start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ) , divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_tanh start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG square-root start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ) end_ARG . (164)

In the matter era (aeqaa2much-less-thansubscript𝑎eq𝑎much-less-thansubscriptsuperscript𝑎2a_{\rm eq}\ll a\ll a^{\prime}_{2}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_a ≪ italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT):

a(32Ωm,0H0t)2/3,ρρ01(32H0t)2.formulae-sequencesimilar-to𝑎superscript32subscriptΩ𝑚0subscript𝐻0𝑡23similar-to𝜌subscript𝜌01superscript32subscript𝐻0𝑡2a\sim\left(\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{\Omega_{m,0}}H_{0}t\right)^{2/3},\qquad\frac{\rho}% {\rho_{0}}\sim\frac{1}{\left(\frac{3}{2}H_{0}t\right)^{2}}.italic_a ∼ ( divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG square-root start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∼ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (165)

In the dark energy era (aa2much-greater-than𝑎subscriptsuperscript𝑎2a\gg a^{\prime}_{2}italic_a ≫ italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT):

a(Ωm,04ΩΛ,0)1/3eΩΛ,0H0t,ρρΛ.formulae-sequencesimilar-to𝑎superscriptsubscriptΩ𝑚04subscriptΩΛ013superscript𝑒subscriptΩΛ0subscript𝐻0𝑡similar-to-or-equals𝜌subscript𝜌Λa\sim\left(\frac{\Omega_{m,0}}{4\Omega_{\Lambda,0}}\right)^{1/3}e^{\sqrt{% \Omega_{\Lambda,0}}H_{0}t},\qquad\rho\simeq\rho_{\Lambda}.italic_a ∼ ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_ρ ≃ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (166)

X.4 Numerical applications

In order to describe quantitatively the physical evolution of the universe from the early inflation to the late acceleration that we observe today we use the “radius of the universe” R(t)=a(t)RΛ𝑅𝑡𝑎𝑡subscript𝑅ΛR(t)=a(t)R_{\Lambda}italic_R ( italic_t ) = italic_a ( italic_t ) italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with RΛ=ctΛ=(8π/Λ)1/2=4.77×1026msubscript𝑅Λ𝑐subscript𝑡Λsuperscript8𝜋Λ124.77superscript1026mR_{\Lambda}=ct_{\Lambda}=(8\pi/\Lambda)^{1/2}=4.77\times 10^{26}\,{\rm m}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_c italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( 8 italic_π / roman_Λ ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 4.77 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 26 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m defined in Appendix B. We also use the results of Appendix E. We consider the two models of Sec. VII.5 which differ from each other only in the early universe. The temporal evolution of the radius and density of the universe in the two models are represented in Figs. 2 and 3.

Model I: In the first model, the density of the primordial universe (maximum density) is equal to the Planck density ρI=ρP=5.16×1099gm3subscript𝜌𝐼subscript𝜌𝑃5.16superscript1099gsuperscriptm3\rho_{I}=\rho_{P}=5.16\times 10^{99}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5.16 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 99 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. In that model, the universe starts at t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 (begining of the inflation) with a size equal to the Planck length R(t=0)=lP=1.62×1035m𝑅𝑡0subscript𝑙𝑃1.62superscript1035mR(t=0)=l_{P}=1.62\times 10^{-35}\,{\rm m}italic_R ( italic_t = 0 ) = italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.62 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 35 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m (i.e. a(t=0)=3.39×1062𝑎𝑡03.39superscript1062a(t=0)=3.39\times 10^{-62}italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) = 3.39 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 62 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) and reaches a size Rc=R1λΛ=3.91×105msubscript𝑅𝑐subscript𝑅1similar-tosuperscriptsubscript𝜆Λ3.91superscript105mR_{c}=R_{1}\sim\lambda_{\Lambda}^{*}=3.91\times 10^{-5}\,{\rm m}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 3.91 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m of the order of the neutrino’s Compton wavelength (i.e. a1=ac=1.98×1032subscript𝑎1subscript𝑎𝑐1.98superscript1032a_{1}=a_{c}=1.98\times 10^{-32}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.98 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 32 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) at the end of the inflation which occurs on a timescale t1=tc=23.8tPsubscript𝑡1subscript𝑡𝑐23.8subscript𝑡𝑃t_{1}=t_{c}=23.8\,t_{P}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 23.8 italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of the order of a few Planck times tP=5.39×1044ssubscript𝑡𝑃5.39superscript1044st_{P}=5.39\times 10^{-44}\,{\rm s}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5.39 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 44 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s. The e𝑒eitalic_e-folding number is N0=68.5subscript𝑁068.5N_{0}=68.5italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 68.5 (the size of the universe increases by a factor 1/ϵ1030similar-to1italic-ϵsuperscript10301/\epsilon\sim 10^{30}1 / italic_ϵ ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 30 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT during the inflation). At t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 the density and the magnetic field are ρ(t=0)ρPsimilar-to-or-equals𝜌𝑡0subscript𝜌𝑃\rho(t=0)\simeq\rho_{P}italic_ρ ( italic_t = 0 ) ≃ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and B(t=0)=3.69×10113T𝐵𝑡03.69superscript10113TB(t=0)=3.69\times 10^{113}\,{\rm T}italic_B ( italic_t = 0 ) = 3.69 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 113 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_T. At t=t1=tc𝑡subscript𝑡1subscript𝑡𝑐t=t_{1}=t_{c}italic_t = italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT the density and the magnetic field are ρ1=ρc=ρP/2subscript𝜌1subscript𝜌𝑐subscript𝜌𝑃2\rho_{1}=\rho_{c}=\rho_{P}/2italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 2 and B1=Bc=1.08×1054Tsubscript𝐵1subscript𝐵𝑐1.08superscript1054TB_{1}=B_{c}=1.08\times 10^{54}\,{\rm T}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.08 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 54 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_T.141414We have used Eqs. (68), (69) and (105) to compute the magnetic field. We also note that the mass of the universe at t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 is equal to the Planck mass MP=ρPlP3=2.18×105gsubscript𝑀𝑃subscript𝜌𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑙𝑃32.18superscript105gM_{P}=\rho_{P}l_{P}^{3}=2.18\times 10^{-5}\,{\rm g}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 2.18 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g (the primordial universe has the same characteristics as a Planck black hole or a planckion particle) while its mass at the end of the inflation is ρPRc31090MPsimilar-tosubscript𝜌𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑅𝑐3superscript1090subscript𝑀𝑃\rho_{P}R_{c}^{3}\sim 10^{90}M_{P}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 90 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This suggests that 1090superscript109010^{90}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 90 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT particles of mass MPsubscript𝑀𝑃M_{P}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT have been created during the inflation, implying that, after the radiation era, the mass of the universe is equal to 1062MPsuperscript1062subscript𝑀𝑃10^{62}M_{P}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 62 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (see Appendix B).

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Temporal evolution of the radius of the universe in logarithmic scales in Model I (black) and Model II (red). The universe exists at all times in the past and in the future. There is no singularity (aioniotic universe). The early universe undergoes a phase of exponential inflation. During the early inflation, the scale factor increases by 30similar-toabsent30\sim 30∼ 30 orders of magnitude in 1042ssimilar-toabsentsuperscript1042s\sim 10^{-42}\,{\rm s}∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 42 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s (Model I) or in 1ssimilar-toabsent1s\sim 1\,{\rm s}∼ 1 roman_s (Model II). This is followed by the radiation era (at1/2proportional-to𝑎superscript𝑡12a\propto t^{1/2}italic_a ∝ italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT), by the matter era (at2/3proportional-to𝑎superscript𝑡23a\propto t^{2/3}italic_a ∝ italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT), and by the dark energy era responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe observed at present. The universe exhibits two types of inflation: An early inflation corresponding to the Planck density ρPsubscript𝜌𝑃\rho_{P}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (Model I) or to the electron density (Model II) and a late inflation corresponding to the cosmological density ρΛsubscript𝜌Λ\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (dark energy or cosmological constant). The evolution of the early and late universe is remarkably symmetric. In our model it is described by two polytropic equations of state with index n=1𝑛1n=1italic_n = 1 and n=1𝑛1n=-1italic_n = - 1, respectively. The dashed line corresponds to the ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM model which presents a big bang singularity at t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0. We have also represented the location of the present universe that is just at the transition between the matter era and the dark energy era (cosmic coincidence).
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Temporal evolution of the density of the universe in logarithmic scales in Model I (black) and Model II (red). The density goes from a maximum value ρmaxsubscript𝜌max\rho_{\rm max}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT equal to the Planck density ρPsubscript𝜌𝑃\rho_{P}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (Model I) or to the electron density ρesubscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{e}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (Model II) to a minimum value ρmin=ρΛsubscript𝜌minsubscript𝜌Λ\rho_{\rm min}=\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT equal to the cosmological density. These two bounds, which are fixed by fundamental constants of physics, are responsible for the early and late inflation of the universe. In between, the density decreases as t2superscript𝑡2t^{-2}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The dashed line corresponds to the ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM model with a big bang singularity at t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0.

Model II: In the second model, the density of the primordial universe (maximum density) is equal to the electron density ρI=ρe=4.07×1016gm3subscript𝜌𝐼subscript𝜌𝑒4.07superscript1016gsuperscriptm3\rho_{I}=\rho_{e}=4.07\times 10^{16}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4.07 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 16 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. This value is justified by applying the nonlinear electrodynamics with the Lagrangian from Eq. (79) to the electron (see Sec. XI). In that model, the universe starts at t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 (begining of the inflation) with a size of the order of the electron radius R(t=0)re=2.82×1015msimilar-to𝑅𝑡0subscript𝑟𝑒2.82superscript1015mR(t=0)\sim r_{e}=2.82\times 10^{-15}\,{\rm m}italic_R ( italic_t = 0 ) ∼ italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2.82 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m (i.e. a(t=0)5.91×1042similar-to𝑎𝑡05.91superscript1042a(t=0)\sim 5.91\times 10^{-42}italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) ∼ 5.91 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 42 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) and reaches a size Rc=R1R~2=7.07×1015msubscript𝑅𝑐subscript𝑅1similar-tosubscript~𝑅27.07superscript1015mR_{c}=R_{1}\sim{\tilde{R}}_{2}=7.07\times 10^{15}\,{\rm m}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ over~ start_ARG italic_R end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 7.07 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m of the order of the radius of a dark energy star of the stellar mass (i.e. a1=ac=1.18×1011subscript𝑎1subscript𝑎𝑐1.18superscript1011a_{1}=a_{c}=1.18\times 10^{-11}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.18 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) at the end of the inflation which occurs on a timescale t1=tc=23.8tesubscript𝑡1subscript𝑡𝑐23.8superscriptsubscript𝑡𝑒t_{1}=t_{c}=23.8\,t_{e}^{*}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 23.8 italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT of the order of a few gravitoelectronic times te=0.0192ssuperscriptsubscript𝑡𝑒0.0192st_{e}^{*}=0.0192\,{\rm s}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.0192 roman_s. The e𝑒eitalic_e-folding number is N0=68.5subscript𝑁068.5N_{0}=68.5italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 68.5 (the size of the universe increases by a factor 1/ϵ1030similar-to1italic-ϵsuperscript10301/\epsilon\sim 10^{30}1 / italic_ϵ ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 30 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT during the inflation). At t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 the density and the magnetic field are ρ(t=0)ρesimilar-to-or-equals𝜌𝑡0subscript𝜌𝑒\rho(t=0)\simeq\rho_{e}italic_ρ ( italic_t = 0 ) ≃ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and B(t=0)=1.04×1072T𝐵𝑡01.04superscript1072TB(t=0)=1.04\times 10^{72}\,{\rm T}italic_B ( italic_t = 0 ) = 1.04 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 72 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_T. At t1=tcsubscript𝑡1subscript𝑡𝑐t_{1}=t_{c}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT the density and the magnetic field are ρ1=ρc=ρe/2subscript𝜌1subscript𝜌𝑐subscript𝜌𝑒2\rho_{1}=\rho_{c}=\rho_{e}/2italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 2 and Bc=3.03×1012Tsubscript𝐵𝑐3.03superscript1012TB_{c}=3.03\times 10^{12}\,{\rm T}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3.03 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 12 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_T (see footnote 14). We also note that the mass of the universe at t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 is equal to the electron mass me=ρere3=9.11×1028gsubscript𝑚𝑒subscript𝜌𝑒superscriptsubscript𝑟𝑒39.11superscript1028gm_{e}=\rho_{e}r_{e}^{3}=9.11\times 10^{-28}\,{\rm g}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 9.11 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 28 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g (the primordial universe has the same characteristics as an electron) while its mass at the end of the inflation is ρeRc31090mesimilar-tosubscript𝜌𝑒superscriptsubscript𝑅𝑐3superscript1090subscript𝑚𝑒\rho_{e}R_{c}^{3}\sim 10^{90}m_{e}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 90 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This suggests that 1090superscript109010^{90}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 90 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT particles of mass mesubscript𝑚𝑒m_{e}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT have been created during the inflation, implying that, after the radiation era, the universe is made of 1083superscript108310^{83}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 83 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT electrons or 1080superscript108010^{80}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 80 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT protons, which is Eddington’s number (see Appendix B).

After the inflation, the evolution of the universe is the same in the two models. The universe undergoes a radiation era, then enters in the matter era at teq=5.25×104yrssubscript𝑡eq5.25superscript104yrst_{\rm eq}=5.25\times 10^{4}\,{\rm yrs}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5.25 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_yrs (i.e. aeq=3.00×104subscript𝑎eq3.00superscript104a_{\rm eq}=3.00\times 10^{-4}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3.00 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) and in the dark energy era at t2=10.2Gyrssuperscriptsubscript𝑡210.2Gyrst_{2}^{\prime}=10.2\,{\rm Gyrs}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 10.2 roman_Gyrs (i.e. a2=0.7634subscriptsuperscript𝑎20.7634a^{\prime}_{2}=0.7634italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.7634). The age of the universe is t0=0.956H01=13.8Gyrssubscript𝑡00.956superscriptsubscript𝐻0113.8Gyrst_{0}=0.956\,H_{0}^{-1}=13.8\,{\rm Gyrs}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.956 italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 13.8 roman_Gyrs (i.e. a0=1subscript𝑎01a_{0}=1italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1). Its size and density are R0=RΛ=4.77×1026msubscript𝑅0subscript𝑅Λ4.77superscript1026mR_{0}=R_{\Lambda}=4.77\times 10^{26}\,{\rm m}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4.77 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 26 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m and ρ0=8.62×1024gm3subscript𝜌08.62superscript1024gsuperscriptm3\rho_{0}=8.62\times 10^{-24}{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 8.62 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 24 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The present magnetic field is B0=4.23×1010Tsubscript𝐵04.23superscript1010TB_{0}=4.23\times 10^{-10}\,{\rm T}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4.23 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 10 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_T (see Sec. V).

XI Nonlinear electrodynamics based on the Lagrangian =/(1+/)1subscript{\cal L}=-{\cal F}/(1+{\cal F}/{\cal F}_{*})caligraphic_L = - caligraphic_F / ( 1 + caligraphic_F / caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ): Electrostatics

In this section, we apply the nonlinear electrodynamics considered previously to the electron in the spirit of the Born-Infeld born1933 ; borninfeld theory. A similar approach has been developed by Kruglov kruglov2015a . We consider a purely electrostatic situation. We compute the electric field created by a pointlike charge 4πe4𝜋𝑒\sqrt{4\pi}esquare-root start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG italic_e and determine the total electric energy that it carries. We then identify this electric energy with the mass-energy of the electron and obtain an estimate of its classical radius and density.

We consider a nonlinear electrodynamics based on the Lagrangian

=1+.1subscript{\cal L}=\frac{-{\cal F}}{1+\frac{{\cal F}}{{\cal F}_{*}}}.caligraphic_L = divide start_ARG - caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG 1 + divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG . (167)

This is the Lagrangian (141) of the generalized radiation without the constant term (vacuum energy) that yields an infinite total energy. We leave the constant =ρc2subscriptsubscript𝜌superscript𝑐2{\cal F}_{*}=\rho_{*}c^{2}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT undetermined for the moment. It will be determined at the end by applying this model to the electron. The linear (Maxwell) electrodynamics is recovered in the limit +subscript{\cal F}_{*}\rightarrow+\inftycaligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT → + ∞. According to Eqs. (40), (41) and (167), the general expressions of the energy density and pressure are

ρc2=1++E2(1+)2,𝜌superscript𝑐21subscriptsuperscript𝐸2superscript1subscript2\rho c^{2}=\frac{{\cal F}}{1+\frac{{\cal F}}{{\cal F}_{*}}}+\frac{E^{2}}{\left% (1+\frac{{\cal F}}{{\cal F}_{*}}\right)^{2}},italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG 1 + divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG + divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (168)
P=1+E22B231(1+)2.𝑃1subscriptsuperscript𝐸22superscript𝐵231superscript1subscript2P=-\frac{{\cal F}}{1+\frac{{\cal F}}{{\cal F}_{*}}}-\frac{E^{2}-2B^{2}}{3}% \frac{1}{\left(1+\frac{{\cal F}}{{\cal F}_{*}}\right)^{2}}.italic_P = - divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG 1 + divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG - divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (169)

XI.1 Electric field

In electrostatics, using Eq. (47), the Lagrangian (167) takes the form

=E22(1E22).superscript𝐸221superscript𝐸22subscript{\cal L}=\frac{E^{2}}{2\left(1-\frac{E^{2}}{2{\cal F}_{*}}\right)}.caligraphic_L = divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) end_ARG . (170)

According to Eqs. (52) and Eq. (167) the electric field created by a pointlike charge 4πe4𝜋𝑒\sqrt{4\pi}esquare-root start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG italic_e is given by

E(r)[1E2(r)2]2=e4πr2.𝐸𝑟superscriptdelimited-[]1superscript𝐸2𝑟2subscript2𝑒4𝜋superscript𝑟2\frac{E(r)}{\left[1-\frac{E^{2}(r)}{2{\cal F}_{*}}\right]^{2}}=\frac{e}{\sqrt{% 4\pi}r^{2}}.divide start_ARG italic_E ( italic_r ) end_ARG start_ARG [ 1 - divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r ) end_ARG start_ARG 2 caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_e end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (171)

In this nonlinear electrodynamics, the electric field is finite at the origin r=0𝑟0r=0italic_r = 0 (unlike in Maxwell’s electrodynamics) with the maximum value E(0)=E=2𝐸0subscript𝐸2subscriptE(0)=E_{*}=\sqrt{2{\cal F}_{*}}italic_E ( 0 ) = italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG 2 caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG. It decreases monotonically with the distance. At small distances (rrmuch-less-than𝑟subscript𝑟r\ll r_{*}italic_r ≪ italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) it decreases as E(r)/2=1r/2r+𝐸𝑟2subscript1𝑟2subscript𝑟E(r)/\sqrt{2{\cal F}_{*}}=1-r/2r_{*}+...italic_E ( italic_r ) / square-root start_ARG 2 caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 1 - italic_r / 2 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + …,151515By contrast, in the Born-Infeld born1933 ; borninfeld model the electric field decreases as E(r)/2=112(r/r)4+𝐸𝑟2subscript112superscript𝑟subscript𝑟4E(r)/\sqrt{2{\cal F}_{*}}=1-\frac{1}{2}(r/r_{*})^{4}+...italic_E ( italic_r ) / square-root start_ARG 2 caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 1 - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( italic_r / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + …. where

r=(e8π)1/2subscript𝑟superscript𝑒8𝜋subscript12r_{*}=\left(\frac{e}{\sqrt{8\pi{\cal F}_{*}}}\right)^{1/2}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG italic_e end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG 8 italic_π caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (172)

is a characteristic radius determined by the finite value of subscript{\cal F_{*}}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in the nonlinear electrodynamics based on Eq. (167). It can be interpreted as the radius of the electron in this model. It reduces to zero in Maxwell’s electrodynanics +subscript{\cal F_{*}}\rightarrow+\inftycaligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT → + ∞. At large distances (rrmuch-greater-than𝑟subscript𝑟r\gg r_{*}italic_r ≫ italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) we recover the Coulomb law E(r)e/(4πr2)similar-to𝐸𝑟𝑒4𝜋superscript𝑟2E(r)\sim e/(\sqrt{4\pi}r^{2})italic_E ( italic_r ) ∼ italic_e / ( square-root start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ). The electric field is plotted as a function of r𝑟ritalic_r in Fig. 4.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Electric field E𝐸Eitalic_E (normalized by 22subscript\sqrt{2{\cal F}_{*}}square-root start_ARG 2 caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG) as a function of the distance r𝑟ritalic_r (normalized by rsubscript𝑟r_{*}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT).

Remark: Conversely, Eq. (172) can be written as

=ρc2=e28πr4.subscriptsubscript𝜌superscript𝑐2superscript𝑒28𝜋superscriptsubscript𝑟4{\cal F}_{*}=\rho_{*}c^{2}=\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi r_{*}^{4}}.caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (173)

Remark: Let us call ρesuperscriptsubscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{e}^{*}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT the extended charge density in the usual (Maxwell) electrodynamics that produces the same electric field as above. It can be determined by the usual Gauss law

𝐄=ρe,𝐄superscriptsubscript𝜌𝑒\nabla\cdot{\bf E}=\rho_{e}^{*},∇ ⋅ bold_E = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (174)

where E(r)𝐸𝑟E(r)italic_E ( italic_r ) is given by Eq. (171). Using the Gauss theorem, we have E(r)=Q(r)/(4πr2)𝐸𝑟𝑄𝑟4𝜋superscript𝑟2E(r)=Q(r)/(4\pi r^{2})italic_E ( italic_r ) = italic_Q ( italic_r ) / ( 4 italic_π italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) where Q(r)=0rρe(r)4πr2𝑑r𝑄𝑟superscriptsubscript0𝑟superscriptsubscript𝜌𝑒superscript𝑟4𝜋superscriptsuperscript𝑟2differential-dsuperscript𝑟Q(r)=\int_{0}^{r}\rho_{e}^{*}(r^{\prime})4\pi{r^{\prime}}^{2}\,dr^{\prime}italic_Q ( italic_r ) = ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) 4 italic_π italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the charge contained within the sphere of radius r𝑟ritalic_r. Since E(r)e/(4πr2)similar-to𝐸𝑟𝑒4𝜋superscript𝑟2E(r)\sim e/(\sqrt{4\pi}r^{2})italic_E ( italic_r ) ∼ italic_e / ( square-root start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) for r+𝑟r\rightarrow+\inftyitalic_r → + ∞, we have Q=limr+E(r)4πr2=4πe𝑄subscript𝑟𝐸𝑟4𝜋superscript𝑟24𝜋𝑒Q=\lim_{r\rightarrow+\infty}E(r)4\pi r^{2}=\sqrt{4\pi}eitalic_Q = roman_lim start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r → + ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E ( italic_r ) 4 italic_π italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG italic_e. Therefore, the total charge Q𝑄Qitalic_Q associated with the extended distribution ρesuperscriptsubscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{e}^{*}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in linear electrodynamics coincides with the charge 4πe4𝜋𝑒\sqrt{4\pi}esquare-root start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG italic_e of the singular point-charge in nonlinear electrodynamics. This is a general result that was first made in connection to the Born-Infeld model born1933 ; borninfeld .

XI.2 Energy density and pressure

The energy density and the pressure are given by Eqs. (53) and (54) with Eq. (167) yielding

ρc2=E2(r)[1+E2(r)2]2[1E2(r)2]2,𝜌superscript𝑐2superscript𝐸2𝑟delimited-[]1superscript𝐸2𝑟2subscript2superscriptdelimited-[]1superscript𝐸2𝑟2subscript2\rho c^{2}=\frac{E^{2}(r)\left[1+\frac{E^{2}(r)}{2{\cal F}_{*}}\right]}{2\left% [1-\frac{E^{2}(r)}{2{\cal F}_{*}}\right]^{2}},italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r ) [ 1 + divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r ) end_ARG start_ARG 2 caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ] end_ARG start_ARG 2 [ 1 - divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r ) end_ARG start_ARG 2 caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (175)
P=E2(r)[13E2(r)2]6[1E2(r)2]2.𝑃superscript𝐸2𝑟delimited-[]13superscript𝐸2𝑟2subscript6superscriptdelimited-[]1superscript𝐸2𝑟2subscript2P=\frac{E^{2}(r)\left[1-\frac{3E^{2}(r)}{2{\cal F}_{*}}\right]}{6\left[1-\frac% {E^{2}(r)}{2{\cal F}_{*}}\right]^{2}}.italic_P = divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r ) [ 1 - divide start_ARG 3 italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r ) end_ARG start_ARG 2 caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ] end_ARG start_ARG 6 [ 1 - divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r ) end_ARG start_ARG 2 caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (176)

The energy density and the pressure diverge at the origin r=0𝑟0r=0italic_r = 0 as ρ/ρ2(r/r)2similar-to𝜌subscript𝜌2superscriptsubscript𝑟𝑟2\rho/\rho_{*}\sim 2(r_{*}/r)^{2}italic_ρ / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 2 ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and P/ρc2(2/3)(r/r)2similar-to𝑃subscript𝜌superscript𝑐223superscriptsubscript𝑟𝑟2P/\rho_{*}c^{2}\sim-(2/3)(r_{*}/r)^{2}italic_P / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ - ( 2 / 3 ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT respectively (this is the same behavior as in the Born-Infeld born1933 ; borninfeld model). The energy density starts from ++\infty+ ∞ at r=0𝑟0r=0italic_r = 0 and decreases to 0+superscript00^{+}0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as ρ/ρ(r/r)4similar-to𝜌subscript𝜌superscriptsubscript𝑟𝑟4\rho/\rho_{*}\sim(r_{*}/r)^{4}italic_ρ / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for r+𝑟r\rightarrow+\inftyitalic_r → + ∞. The pressure starts from -\infty- ∞ at r=0𝑟0r=0italic_r = 0, increases, vanishes at r0/r=2/33/4subscript𝑟0subscript𝑟2superscript334r_{0}/r_{*}=2/3^{3/4}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 / 3 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (corresponding to E0/2=1/3subscript𝐸02subscript13E_{0}/\sqrt{2{\cal F}_{*}}=1/\sqrt{3}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / square-root start_ARG 2 caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 1 / square-root start_ARG 3 end_ARG and ρ0/ρ=1subscript𝜌0subscript𝜌1\rho_{0}/\rho_{*}=1italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1), becomes positive, reaches a maximum Pmax/ρc2=1/24subscript𝑃maxsubscript𝜌superscript𝑐2124P_{\rm max}/\rho_{*}c^{2}=1/24italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1 / 24 at rm/r=4/53/4subscript𝑟𝑚subscript𝑟4superscript534r_{m}/r_{*}=4/5^{3/4}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4 / 5 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (corresponding to Em/2=1/5subscript𝐸𝑚2subscript15E_{m}/\sqrt{2{\cal F}_{*}}=1/\sqrt{5}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / square-root start_ARG 2 caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 1 / square-root start_ARG 5 end_ARG and ρm/ρ=3/8subscript𝜌𝑚subscript𝜌38\rho_{m}/\rho_{*}=3/8italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3 / 8) and decreases to 0+superscript00^{+}0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as P/ρc2(1/3)(r/r)4similar-to𝑃subscript𝜌superscript𝑐213superscriptsubscript𝑟𝑟4P/\rho_{*}c^{2}\sim(1/3)(r_{*}/r)^{4}italic_P / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ ( 1 / 3 ) ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for r+𝑟r\rightarrow+\inftyitalic_r → + ∞. The energy density and the pressure are plotted as a function of r𝑟ritalic_r in Fig. 5.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Energy density ρc2𝜌superscript𝑐2\rho c^{2}italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (normalized by ρc2subscript𝜌superscript𝑐2\rho_{*}c^{2}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) and pressure P𝑃Pitalic_P (normalized by ρc2subscript𝜌superscript𝑐2\rho_{*}c^{2}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) as a function of the distance r𝑟ritalic_r (normalized by rsubscript𝑟r_{*}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT).

XI.3 Equation of state

Eliminating the electric field E(r)𝐸𝑟E(r)italic_E ( italic_r ) between Eqs. (175) and (176) we obtain the equation of state

Pρc2=16(12ρρ+1+8ρρ).𝑃subscript𝜌superscript𝑐21612𝜌subscript𝜌18𝜌subscript𝜌\frac{P}{\rho_{*}c^{2}}=\frac{1}{6}\left(-1-2\frac{\rho}{\rho_{*}}+\sqrt{1+8% \frac{\rho}{\rho_{*}}}\right).divide start_ARG italic_P end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 6 end_ARG ( - 1 - 2 divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG + square-root start_ARG 1 + 8 divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG ) . (177)

For small energy densities ρc20𝜌superscript𝑐20\rho c^{2}\rightarrow 0italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → 0 (large distances) we recover the usual equation of state of the radiation

P13ρc2,similar-to𝑃13𝜌superscript𝑐2P\sim\frac{1}{3}\rho c^{2},italic_P ∼ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (178)

corresponding to Maxwell’s linear electrodynamics. For large energy densities ρc2+𝜌superscript𝑐2\rho c^{2}\rightarrow+\inftyitalic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → + ∞ (short distances) we obtain the equation of state

P13ρc2.similar-to𝑃13𝜌superscript𝑐2P\sim-\frac{1}{3}\rho c^{2}.italic_P ∼ - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (179)

This is a linear equation of state of the form P=αρc2𝑃𝛼𝜌superscript𝑐2P=\alpha\rho c^{2}italic_P = italic_α italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with α=1/3𝛼13\alpha=-1/3italic_α = - 1 / 3. The same equation of state is obtained in the Born-Infeld born1933 ; borninfeld model at high densities (both for the electric field of the electron and for the magnetic universe).161616Interestingly, this equation of state occurs in cosmology in relation to the Milne model of the universe milne . This is also the equation of state of a gas of cosmic string. Therefore, it may describe a cosmic stringlike era (see, e.g., becas ). We note that the pressure in the core (r<r0𝑟subscript𝑟0r<r_{0}italic_r < italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) is negative. If we view the electron as an extended charge of typical radius rsubscript𝑟r_{*}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (see below), a negative pressure is necessary to counteract the ordinary electrostatic repulsion and ensure its cohesion. This is similar to the Poincaré stress poincare1905 ; poincareE introduced in the Abraham-Lorentz abraham ; lorentz electromagnetic model of the electron to stabilize the particle (see Appendix F of massmaxrel ). The equation of state (177) is plotted in Fig. 6. We note that this “electric” equation of state differs from the “magnetic” equation of state (82) even though the electromagnetic Lagrangian is the same.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Pressure P𝑃Pitalic_P (normalized by ρc2subscript𝜌superscript𝑐2\rho_{*}c^{2}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) as a function of the energy density ρ𝜌\rhoitalic_ρ (normalized by ρsubscript𝜌\rho_{*}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT). This is the electrostatic equation of state associated with the Lagrangian (167).

XI.4 Classical radius of the electron and value of =ρc2subscriptsubscript𝜌superscript𝑐2{\cal F}_{*}=\rho_{*}c^{2}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT

The electric energy density ρ(r)c2𝜌𝑟superscript𝑐2\rho(r)c^{2}italic_ρ ( italic_r ) italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT diverges at the origin r=0𝑟0r=0italic_r = 0 as r2superscript𝑟2r^{-2}italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. However, the total electric energy

=0+ρ(r)c24πr2𝑑rsuperscriptsubscript0𝜌𝑟superscript𝑐24𝜋superscript𝑟2differential-d𝑟{\cal E}=\int_{0}^{+\infty}\rho(r)c^{2}4\pi r^{2}\,drcaligraphic_E = ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ρ ( italic_r ) italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 italic_π italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_r (180)

is finite. This is like in the Born-Infeld born1933 ; borninfeld model. Following Born born1933 we shall identify the electrostatic energy with the mass of the electron via the relation171717This relation has a long history in physics even before Einstein’s theory of relativity (see Appendix F of massmaxrel ). It appeared in relation to the Abraham-Lorentz model of the electron where it was believed that the mass of a particle had an electromagnetic origin thomson1881 . The Born-Infeld born1933 ; borninfeld theory of the electron can be considered as a revival of the old idea of the electromagnetic origin of mass; namely, that the electron is a singularity in the electromagnetic field and that its mass is purely electromagnetic. By contrast, it is not possible to identify =mec2subscript𝑚𝑒superscript𝑐2{\cal E}=m_{e}c^{2}caligraphic_E = italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in Maxwell’s electrodynamics because the electromagnetic energy {\cal E}caligraphic_E is infinite whereas mesubscript𝑚𝑒m_{e}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is finite.

=mec2.subscript𝑚𝑒superscript𝑐2{\cal E}=m_{e}c^{2}.caligraphic_E = italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (181)

This relation gives an electromagnetic origin to the mass of the electron and allows one to determine subscript{\cal F}_{*}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (or ρsubscript𝜌\rho_{*}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT or rsubscript𝑟r_{*}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT). Using Eq. (171), (172), (175) and (180) we find that the electrostatic energy of the electron is

=e2r01(1+y2)(3y2+1)4y𝑑y=1615e2r,superscript𝑒2subscript𝑟superscriptsubscript011superscript𝑦23superscript𝑦214𝑦differential-d𝑦1615superscript𝑒2subscript𝑟{\cal E}=\frac{e^{2}}{r_{*}}\int_{0}^{1}\frac{(1+y^{2})(3y^{2}+1)}{4\sqrt{y}}% \,dy=\frac{16}{15}\,\frac{e^{2}}{r_{*}},caligraphic_E = divide start_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG ( 1 + italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( 3 italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG 4 square-root start_ARG italic_y end_ARG end_ARG italic_d italic_y = divide start_ARG 16 end_ARG start_ARG 15 end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG , (182)

where y=E/2𝑦𝐸2subscripty=E/\sqrt{2{\cal F}_{*}}italic_y = italic_E / square-root start_ARG 2 caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG. Together with Eq. (181) this gives

mec2=1615e2r.subscript𝑚𝑒superscript𝑐21615superscript𝑒2subscript𝑟m_{e}c^{2}=\frac{16}{15}\,\frac{e^{2}}{r_{*}}.italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 16 end_ARG start_ARG 15 end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG . (183)

Comparing Eq. (183) with Eq. (230) we get

r=1615re=3.00×1015m,subscript𝑟1615subscript𝑟𝑒3.00superscript1015mr_{*}=\frac{16}{15}r_{e}=3.00\times 10^{-15}\,{\rm m},italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 16 end_ARG start_ARG 15 end_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3.00 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m , (184)

which may be interpreted as the electron radius in the present model (it turns out that rsubscript𝑟r_{*}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is very close to resubscript𝑟𝑒r_{e}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT since 16/151.07similar-to-or-equals16151.0716/15\simeq 1.0716 / 15 ≃ 1.07). In this sense, the present model (similarly to the Born-Infeld born1933 ; borninfeld model) justifies the relation from Eq. (230) defining the classical radius of the electron. In the present model (as in the Born-Infeld born1933 ; borninfeld electrodynamics), the electron has a finite effective radius because the electric field and the electrostatic energy of a point charge are finite. This is basically due to the finite value of subscript{\cal F}_{*}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in the Lagrangian. According to Eqs. (230), (173) and (184) we have

=e28πr4=18π(1615)4e2re4=18π(1615)4mec2re3.subscriptsuperscript𝑒28𝜋superscriptsubscript𝑟418𝜋superscript16154superscript𝑒2superscriptsubscript𝑟𝑒418𝜋superscript16154subscript𝑚𝑒superscript𝑐2superscriptsubscript𝑟𝑒3{\cal F}_{*}=\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi r_{*}^{4}}=\frac{1}{8\pi(\frac{16}{15})^{4}}% \frac{e^{2}}{r_{e}^{4}}=\frac{1}{8\pi(\frac{16}{15})^{4}}\frac{m_{e}c^{2}}{r_{% e}^{3}}.caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_π ( divide start_ARG 16 end_ARG start_ARG 15 end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_π ( divide start_ARG 16 end_ARG start_ARG 15 end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (185)

Using Eqs. (75) and (234), this gives

ρ=18π(1615)4mere3=18π(1615)4ρe=1.25×1015gm3.subscript𝜌18𝜋superscript16154subscript𝑚𝑒superscriptsubscript𝑟𝑒318𝜋superscript16154subscript𝜌𝑒1.25superscript1015gsuperscriptm3\rho_{*}=\frac{1}{8\pi(\frac{16}{15})^{4}}\frac{m_{e}}{r_{e}^{3}}=\frac{1}{8% \pi(\frac{16}{15})^{4}}\rho_{e}=1.25\times 10^{15}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}.italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_π ( divide start_ARG 16 end_ARG start_ARG 15 end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_π ( divide start_ARG 16 end_ARG start_ARG 15 end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.25 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (186)

Therefore, as could have been expected, we find that ρsubscript𝜌\rho_{*}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is of the order of the density of the electron ρesubscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{e}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (up to a factor 0.03070.03070.03070.0307). This is much smaller than the Planck density ρPsubscript𝜌𝑃\rho_{P}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. These densities differ by 80808080 orders of magnitude (see Appendix C).

Remark: We must, however, point out a difficulty with this model. If we assume that subscript{\cal F}_{*}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a universal constant and if we apply the same argument to the proton (which has a charge opposite to that of the electron) we would find the same radius and the same mass as the electron, which is obviously incorrect. This suggests that the mass of the proton has not an electromagnetic origin, even in a context of nonlinear electrodynamics.

XI.5 Heisenberg-Euler Lagrangian

Following Kruglov kruglov2020 we can compare the previous Lagrangian model at the weak field limit with the Heisenberg-Euler he Lagrangian, which is the QED Lagrangian with one loop correction. The Heisenberg-Euler Lagrangian reads

HE+λ2+similar-to-or-equalssubscriptHE𝜆superscript2{\cal L}_{\rm HE}\simeq-{\cal F}+\lambda{\cal F}^{2}+...caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_HE end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ - caligraphic_F + italic_λ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + … (187)

with

λ=8α2453me4c5,𝜆8superscript𝛼245superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi3superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑒4superscript𝑐5\lambda=\frac{8\alpha^{2}}{45}\frac{\hbar^{3}}{m_{e}^{4}c^{5}},italic_λ = divide start_ARG 8 italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 45 end_ARG divide start_ARG roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (188)

where α=e2/c𝛼superscript𝑒2Planck-constant-over-2-pi𝑐\alpha=e^{2}/\hbar citalic_α = italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / roman_ℏ italic_c is the fine-structure constant. When /1much-less-thansubscript1{{\cal F}}/{{\cal F}_{*}}\ll 1caligraphic_F / caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ 1, we can expand Eq. (167) to first order and we obtain

+2.similar-to-or-equalssuperscript2subscript{\cal L}\simeq-{\cal F}+\frac{{\cal F}^{2}}{{\cal F}_{*}}.caligraphic_L ≃ - caligraphic_F + divide start_ARG caligraphic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG . (189)

Comparing this expression with the Heisenberg-Euler Lagrangian (187) we get

=458α2me4c53.subscript458superscript𝛼2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑒4superscript𝑐5superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi3{\cal F}_{*}=\frac{45}{8\alpha^{2}}\frac{m_{e}^{4}c^{5}}{\hbar^{3}}.caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 45 end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (190)

Recalling that =ρc2subscriptsubscript𝜌superscript𝑐2{\cal F}_{*}=\rho_{*}c^{2}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [see Eq. (75)] we find that

ρ=458α2me4c33=458αρe=1.67×1015gm3,subscript𝜌458superscript𝛼2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑒4superscript𝑐3superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi3458𝛼subscript𝜌𝑒1.67superscript1015gsuperscriptm3\rho_{*}=\frac{45}{8\alpha^{2}}\frac{m_{e}^{4}c^{3}}{\hbar^{3}}=\frac{45}{8}% \alpha\rho_{e}=1.67\times 10^{15}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}},italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 45 end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 45 end_ARG start_ARG 8 end_ARG italic_α italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.67 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (191)

where ρesubscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{e}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the electron density from Eq. (235). Therefore, this argument confirms that ρsubscript𝜌\rho_{*}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is of the order of the electronic density (up to a factor 0.04100.04100.04100.0410). The comparison between Eqs. (186) and (191) gives α=1/[45π(16/15)4]=1/183𝛼1delimited-[]45𝜋superscript161541183\alpha=1/[45\pi(16/15)^{4}]=1/183italic_α = 1 / [ 45 italic_π ( 16 / 15 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] = 1 / 183.

XI.6 Fundamental length

In the present model of nonlinear electrodynamics, the electric field created by a point like charge (electron) is nonsingular at the origin and the electrostatic energy is finite even though the central energy density diverges. On the other hand, the mass of a charged particle like the electron has a purely electromagnetic nature as in the Abraham-Lorentz model abraham ; lorentz . If we identify the electromagnetic energy {\cal E}caligraphic_E with the mass-energy mec2subscript𝑚𝑒superscript𝑐2m_{e}c^{2}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT of the electron we can define the classical radius resubscript𝑟𝑒r_{e}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of the electron and its density ρesubscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{e}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

These results are similar to the Born-Infeld born1933 ; borninfeld electrodynamics and very different from Maxwell’s electrodynamics where the electric field created by a point like charge is singular at the origin and the electrostatic energy is infinite. In that case, the electron has a vanishing radius and an infinite density. Therefore, its mass (which is finite) cannot have an electromagnetic origin.

The regularization of the divergences (infinities) is due to the finite value of subscript{\cal F}_{*}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT which plays a role similar to the speed of light c𝑐citalic_c in the theory of relativity (this analogy is at the basis of the Born-Infeld born1933 ; borninfeld model who adopted a Lagrangian of nonlinear electrodynamics similar to the Lagrangian of a relativistic particle). The finiteness of subscript{\cal F}_{*}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT prevents the electric field to be larger than E(0)=E=2𝐸0subscript𝐸2subscriptE(0)=E_{*}=\sqrt{2{\cal F}_{*}}italic_E ( 0 ) = italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG 2 caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG. It gives an upper bound on the possible electric field. Similarly, the finiteness of the speed of light c𝑐citalic_c imposes v<c𝑣𝑐v<citalic_v < italic_c in relativistic mechanics. When +subscript{\cal F}_{*}\rightarrow+\inftycaligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT → + ∞ we recover Maxwell’s electrodynamics. Similarly, when c+𝑐c\rightarrow+\inftyitalic_c → + ∞, we recover Newton’s mechanics.

If we assume that the nonlinear Lagrangian (167) applies both to the magnetic universe like in Sec. VII and to the electron like in the present section we come to the conclusion that ρIsubscript𝜌𝐼\rho_{I}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Sec. VII should be identified to the electron density ρesubscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{e}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, not to the Planck density ρPsubscript𝜌𝑃\rho_{P}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This argument selects Model II with respect to Model I in Sec. VII.5. Therefore, in this model, the primordial density of the universe (maximum density) is equal to the electron density, not to the Planck density. This implies (see Sec. VII.5) that the duration of the inflation (1ssimilar-toabsent1s\sim 1\,{\rm s}∼ 1 roman_s) is much longer than usually believed (1042ssimilar-toabsentsuperscript1042s\sim 10^{-42}\,{\rm s}∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 42 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s).

Following Kruglov kruglov2015a , one can interprete the quantity rresimilar-tosubscript𝑟subscript𝑟𝑒r_{*}\sim r_{e}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as a fundamental length due to quantum gravity effects. Indeed, for strong electromagnetic fields, nonlinear electrodynamics may arise from possible quantum gravity corrections to linear electrodynamics. This is how a new parameter rsubscript𝑟r_{*}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with the dimension of a length is introduced in the model [see Eq. (172)]. We can substantiate this claim with the following arguments. We have already mentioned that resubscript𝑟𝑒r_{e}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT represents in Model II the initial size of the universe at time t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 (see Appendix E and Sec. X.4). On the other hand, we will show in Sec. XII that the electron classical radius determines the correct value of the cosmological constant (vacuum energy) through Zeldovich’s second formula zeldovich ; zeldovichA . This justifies the Eddington formula relating the cosmological constant to the radius (or to the mass) of the electron and the other fundamental constants of physics eddington1931lambda ; ouf . The electron radius can also be interpreted as a minimum scale in quantum gravity in the sense of Karolyhazy karolyhazy . All these arguments suggest that resubscript𝑟𝑒r_{e}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT should be interpreted as a fundamental minimum length. Since this minimum length is much larger than the Planck length (relPmuch-greater-thansubscript𝑟𝑒subscript𝑙𝑃r_{e}\gg l_{P}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≫ italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) this shows that quantum gravity is not a Planck scale phenomenon. This is very different from the results obtained in Model I where the initial size of the universe at t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 is the Planck length lPsubscript𝑙𝑃l_{P}italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

XII Heuristic connections between nonlinear electrodynamics, quantum gravity, vacuum energy and dark energy

In this section we relate the two cosmological models discussed in Sec. VII.5 to the two models of vacuum energy introduced by Zeldovich zeldovich ; zeldovichA and to the two models of minimum length introduced in quantum gravity by Karolyhazy karolyhazy and Amelino-Camelia gacnature . We show striking heuristic connections between these apparently disconnected topics.

XII.1 Model I

Lemaître lemaitre1934 was the first to understand that the effect of the cosmological constant ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ is equivalent to that of a fluid with a constant density ρΛ=Λc2/8πGsubscript𝜌ΛΛsuperscript𝑐28𝜋𝐺\rho_{\Lambda}=\Lambda c^{2}/8\pi Gitalic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_Λ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 8 italic_π italic_G described by an equation of state P=ρc2𝑃𝜌superscript𝑐2P=-\rho c^{2}italic_P = - italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. He interpreted ρΛc2subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as the vacuum energy density. However, he did not connect his interpretation with the zero-point energy, nor relate it to quantum mechanics. The origin of the vacuum energy was first discussed by Zeldovich zeldovich ; zeldovichA and Sakharov sakharov in relation to quantum field theory. When one tries to compute the vacuum energy density ρΛsubscript𝜌Λ\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT from first principles, one encounters a severe problem of divergence at small scales (UV divergence). However, following the seminal study of Zeldovich zeldovichA , several procedures have been devised to deal with these divergences (see martin for a review). Zeldovich zeldovich ; zeldovichA introduced two models of vacuum energy, each depending on a fundamental mass scale m𝑚mitalic_m. In his first model, the regularized, finite, energy density of the vacuum which leads to the equation of state of vacuum P=ρc2𝑃𝜌superscript𝑐2P=-\rho c^{2}italic_P = - italic_ρ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as a consequence of relativistic Lorentz invariance reads181818The energy density of vacuum fluctuations can be related to the Casimir effect casimir and is given qualitatively by ρΛc2(e2/r)/r3c/r4similar-tosubscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2superscript𝑒2𝑟superscript𝑟3similar-toPlanck-constant-over-2-pi𝑐superscript𝑟4\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}\sim(e^{2}/r)/r^{3}\sim\hbar c/r^{4}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ ( italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_r ) / italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ roman_ℏ italic_c / italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT where e2/rsuperscript𝑒2𝑟e^{2}/ritalic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_r is the electrostatic energy and we have used e2csimilar-tosuperscript𝑒2Planck-constant-over-2-pi𝑐e^{2}\sim\hbar citalic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ roman_ℏ italic_c in order of magnitude ouf .

ρΛc2m4c53cλC4,similar-tosubscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2superscript𝑚4superscript𝑐5superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi3similar-toPlanck-constant-over-2-pi𝑐superscriptsubscript𝜆𝐶4\displaystyle\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}\sim\frac{m^{4}c^{5}}{\hbar^{3}}\sim\frac{% \hbar c}{\lambda_{C}^{4}},italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∼ divide start_ARG roman_ℏ italic_c end_ARG start_ARG italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (192)

where we have introduced the Compton wavelength λC=/mcsubscript𝜆𝐶Planck-constant-over-2-pi𝑚𝑐\lambda_{C}={\hbar}/{mc}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_ℏ / italic_m italic_c of the elementary particle of mass m𝑚mitalic_m. It represents the relevant small scale cut-off λminsubscript𝜆min\lambda_{\rm min}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Zeldovich’s model I. The expression (192) of the vacuum energy density is commonly adopted in the literature martin . We note that this expression of the vacuum energy density does not involve the gravitational constant G𝐺Gitalic_G. This may unveil a problem with this approach if vacuum energy arises from quantum gravity (see below). In his original paper, Zeldovich zeldovichA used Eq. (192) with the proton mass and obtained a discrepency of 40404040 orders of magnitude with the empirical cosmological density. If we use the Planck mass and the Planck length in Eq. (192), we find that ρΛρPsimilar-tosubscript𝜌Λsubscript𝜌𝑃\rho_{\Lambda}\sim\rho_{P}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, yielding a discrepency of 120120120120 orders of magnitude with the empirical value. This is the usual formulation of the cosmological constant problem weinbergcosmo . Alternatively, if we adopt the measured value of the cosmological constant and reverse the relation from Eq. (192) we get

mΛ=(Λ3Gc)1/4=mΛMP=5.04×103eV/c2,superscriptsubscript𝑚ΛsuperscriptΛsuperscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi3𝐺𝑐14subscript𝑚Λsubscript𝑀𝑃5.04superscript103eVsuperscriptc2m_{\Lambda}^{*}=\left(\frac{\Lambda\hbar^{3}}{Gc}\right)^{1/4}=\sqrt{m_{% \Lambda}M_{P}}=5.04\times 10^{-3}\,{\rm eV/c^{2}},italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG roman_Λ roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_G italic_c end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.04 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_eV / roman_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (193)
λΛ=(GΛc3)1/4=RΛlP=3.91×105m,superscriptsubscript𝜆Λsuperscript𝐺Planck-constant-over-2-piΛsuperscript𝑐314superscriptsubscript𝑅Λsubscript𝑙𝑃3.91superscript105m\lambda_{\Lambda}^{*}=\left(\frac{G\hbar}{\Lambda c^{3}}\right)^{1/4}=\sqrt{R_% {\Lambda}^{*}l_{P}}=3.91\times 10^{-5}\,{\rm m},italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG italic_G roman_ℏ end_ARG start_ARG roman_Λ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 3.91 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m , (194)

where mΛ=Λ/c=2.08×1033eV/c2subscript𝑚ΛPlanck-constant-over-2-piΛ𝑐2.08superscript1033eVsuperscriptc2m_{\Lambda}=\hbar\sqrt{\Lambda}/c=2.08\times 10^{-33}\,{\rm eV/c^{2}}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_ℏ square-root start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG / italic_c = 2.08 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 33 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_eV / roman_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the cosmon mass and RΛ=1/Λ=9.49×1025msuperscriptsubscript𝑅Λ1Λ9.49superscript1025mR_{\Lambda}^{*}=1/\sqrt{\Lambda}=9.49\times 10^{25}\,{\rm m}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1 / square-root start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG = 9.49 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 25 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m is the cosmological length ouf . In Ref. ouf we arrived at the mass and length scales (193) and (194) by different considerations and we identified them with the mass and Compton wavelength of the neutrino. We conclude therefore that the mass m𝑚mitalic_m and the length λCsubscript𝜆𝐶\lambda_{C}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT leading to the observed value of the cosmological constant in Zeldovich’s model I correspond to the mass and Compton wavelength of the neutrino.

Some authors have tried to determine the limit on the measurability of spacetime distances in quantum gravity or the minimum uncertainty of spacetime geodesics gacnature . It arises when taking into account the quantum properties of the devices used for measurement. According to Amelino-Camelia gacnature the minimum uncertainty of the measure of the length of an object of size l𝑙litalic_l due to quantum fluctuations is given by

δl(llP)1/2.similar-to𝛿𝑙superscript𝑙subscript𝑙𝑃12\delta l\sim(ll_{P})^{1/2}.italic_δ italic_l ∼ ( italic_l italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (195)

When applied to the Universe as a whole (lRΛsimilar-to𝑙superscriptsubscript𝑅Λl\sim R_{\Lambda}^{*}italic_l ∼ italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) this gives

λmin=RΛlP=3.91×105m,subscript𝜆minsuperscriptsubscript𝑅Λsubscript𝑙𝑃3.91superscript105m\lambda_{\rm min}=\sqrt{R_{\Lambda}^{*}l_{P}}=3.91\times 10^{-5}\,{\rm m},italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 3.91 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m , (196)

which corresponds to Eq. (194). This minimum length is larger than the Planck length lP=1.62×1035msubscript𝑙𝑃1.62superscript1035ml_{P}=1.62\times 10^{-35}\,{\rm m}italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.62 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 35 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m showing that quantum gravity is not a Planck scale phenomenon.

In Model I of Sec. VII.5 we have identified the primordial (maximum) density of the universe with the Planck density ρPsubscript𝜌𝑃\rho_{P}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Then, we have shown that the universe starts with a size R(0)=lP𝑅0subscript𝑙𝑃R(0)=l_{P}italic_R ( 0 ) = italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT equal to the Planck length at t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 and reaches a size R1=λΛsubscript𝑅1superscriptsubscript𝜆ΛR_{1}=\lambda_{\Lambda}^{*}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT equal to the neutrino’s Compton wavelength at the end of the inflation of duration tc=23.8tPsubscript𝑡𝑐23.8subscript𝑡𝑃t_{c}=23.8\,t_{P}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 23.8 italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (see Sec. VII.5, Sec. X.4 and Appendix E).

Combining the above results, we conclude that the minimum length λminsubscript𝜆min\lambda_{\rm min}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Zeldovich’s model I leading to the correct value of the cosmological constant corresponds to:

(i) the Compton wavelength of the neutrino [Eq. (194)].

(ii) the limit on the measurability of spacetime distances [Eq. (196)] in quantum gravity according to Amelino-Camelia gacnature .191919This lengthscale can also be related to the radius of a fifth extra dimension dlb .

(iii) The radius of the universe at the end of the inflation in model I of Sec. VII.5 [Eq. (251)]. This radius defines an effective or physical “minimum” length λΛ=3.91×105msuperscriptsubscript𝜆Λ3.91superscript105m\lambda_{\Lambda}^{*}=3.91\times 10^{-5}\,{\rm m}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 3.91 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m which could replace the Planck length lP=1.62×1035msubscript𝑙𝑃1.62superscript1035ml_{P}=1.62\times 10^{-35}\,{\rm m}italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.62 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 35 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m and yield the correct value of the vacuum energy density when substituted into Eq. (192).

In conclusion, if we identify λminsubscript𝜆min\lambda_{\rm min}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to the Compton wavelength of the neutrino in Zeldovich’s model I, we can express the Compton wavelength λΛsuperscriptsubscript𝜆Λ\lambda_{\Lambda}^{*}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and the mass mΛsuperscriptsubscript𝑚Λm_{\Lambda}^{*}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT of the neutrino as a function of the cosmological constant [see Eqs. (193) and (194)]. Conversely, assuming that the neutrino has these characteristic parameters, we can explain the measured value of ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ [see Eq. (3)].

XII.2 Model II

By considering the gravitational interaction energy between virtual pairs of the quantum electrodynamic vacuum, Zeldovich zeldovich ; zeldovichA obtained another formula for the vacuum energy density202020He wrote the vacuum energy density under the form ρΛc2Gm2λC×1λC3.similar-tosubscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2𝐺superscript𝑚2subscript𝜆𝐶1superscriptsubscript𝜆𝐶3\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}\sim\frac{Gm^{2}}{\lambda_{C}}\times\frac{1}{\lambda_{C}^{3% }}.italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ divide start_ARG italic_G italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG × divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (197) This expression assumes that the vacuum contains virtual pairs of particles with effective density n1/λC3similar-to𝑛1superscriptsubscript𝜆𝐶3n\sim 1/\lambda_{C}^{3}italic_n ∼ 1 / italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and that these pairs have a gravitational energy of interaction Gm2/λC𝐺superscript𝑚2subscript𝜆𝐶Gm^{2}/\lambda_{C}italic_G italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

ρΛc2Gm6c44G2c2λC6,similar-tosubscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2𝐺superscript𝑚6superscript𝑐4superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi4similar-to𝐺superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2superscript𝑐2superscriptsubscript𝜆𝐶6\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}\sim\frac{Gm^{6}c^{4}}{\hbar^{4}}\sim\frac{G\hbar^{2}}{c^{2% }\lambda_{C}^{6}},italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ divide start_ARG italic_G italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∼ divide start_ARG italic_G roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (198)

where we have introduced the Compton wavelength λC=/mcsubscript𝜆𝐶Planck-constant-over-2-pi𝑚𝑐\lambda_{C}={\hbar}/{mc}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_ℏ / italic_m italic_c of the particle of mass m𝑚mitalic_m. It represents the relevant minimum length λminsubscript𝜆min\lambda_{\rm min}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Zeldovich’s model II. We note that this expression of the vacuum density explicitly involves the gravitational constant G𝐺Gitalic_G. Therefore, it may be related to a theory of quantum gravity. In his original papers, Zeldovich zeldovich ; zeldovichA used Eq. (198) with the proton mass and obtained a discrepency of 7777 orders of magnitude with the empirical cosmological density. If we use the Planck mass and the Planck length in Eq. (198), we find that ρΛρPsimilar-tosubscript𝜌Λsubscript𝜌𝑃\rho_{\Lambda}\sim\rho_{P}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, yielding a discrepency of 120120120120 orders of magnitude with the empirical value (cosmological constant problem). Alternatively, if we adopt the measured value of the cosmological constant and reverse the relation from Eq. (198) we get

me(Λ4G2)1/6(mΛMP2)1/3=6.77×107eV/c2,similar-tosubscript𝑚𝑒superscriptΛsuperscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi4superscript𝐺216similar-tosuperscriptsubscript𝑚Λsuperscriptsubscript𝑀𝑃2136.77superscript107eVsuperscriptc2m_{e}\sim\left(\frac{\Lambda\hbar^{4}}{G^{2}}\right)^{1/6}\sim(m_{\Lambda}M_{P% }^{2})^{1/3}=6.77\times 10^{7}\,{\rm eV/c^{2}},italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ ( divide start_ARG roman_Λ roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 6.77 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 7 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_eV / roman_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (199)
λe(G22Λc6)1/6(RΛlP2)1/3=2.92×1015m.similar-tosubscript𝜆𝑒superscriptsuperscript𝐺2superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2Λsuperscript𝑐616similar-tosuperscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑅Λsuperscriptsubscript𝑙𝑃2132.92superscript1015m\lambda_{e}\sim\left(\frac{G^{2}\hbar^{2}}{\Lambda c^{6}}\right)^{1/6}\sim(R_{% \Lambda}^{*}l_{P}^{2})^{1/3}=2.92\times 10^{-15}\,{\rm m}.italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ ( divide start_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Λ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ ( italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 2.92 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m . (200)

In Ref. ouf we arrived at the mass and length scales (199) and (200) by different considerations and we identified them with the mass and Compton wavelength of the electron (in order of magnitude). Actually, we obtained accurate expressions of the electron mass and electron Compton wavelength under the form preouf1 ; preouf2 ; ouf

meα(Λ4G2)1/6,λe=reα1α(G22Λc6)1/6,formulae-sequencesimilar-to-or-equalssubscript𝑚𝑒𝛼superscriptΛsuperscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi4superscript𝐺216subscript𝜆𝑒subscript𝑟𝑒𝛼similar-to-or-equals1𝛼superscriptsuperscript𝐺2superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2Λsuperscript𝑐616m_{e}\simeq\alpha\left(\frac{\Lambda\hbar^{4}}{G^{2}}\right)^{1/6},\qquad% \lambda_{e}=\frac{r_{e}}{\alpha}\simeq\frac{1}{\alpha}\left(\frac{G^{2}\hbar^{% 2}}{\Lambda c^{6}}\right)^{1/6},italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ italic_α ( divide start_ARG roman_Λ roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_α end_ARG ≃ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_α end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Λ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (201)

where α=e2/(c)1/137𝛼superscript𝑒2Planck-constant-over-2-pi𝑐similar-to-or-equals1137\alpha=e^{2}/(\hbar c)\simeq 1/137italic_α = italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / ( roman_ℏ italic_c ) ≃ 1 / 137 is the fine-structure constant (see Appendix C). We see that Eq. (200) corresponds more closely to the classical electron radius resubscript𝑟𝑒r_{e}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT than to the electron Compton wavelength λesubscript𝜆𝑒\lambda_{e}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (we note that the classical electron radius does not depend explicitly on α𝛼\alphaitalic_α). The formula (201) provides an accurate form of the Eddington formula eddington1931lambda ; ouf relating the mass of the electron to the cosmological constant (or the converse).212121It would be desirable to know if this formula is exact or just a good approximate relation (possibly the leading term in an expansion in powers of α𝛼\alphaitalic_α). It can be written meα(mΛMP2)1/3similar-to-or-equalssubscript𝑚𝑒𝛼superscriptsubscript𝑚Λsuperscriptsubscript𝑀𝑃213m_{e}\simeq\alpha(m_{\Lambda}M_{P}^{2})^{1/3}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ italic_α ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and re=αλe(RΛlP2)1/3subscript𝑟𝑒𝛼subscript𝜆𝑒similar-to-or-equalssuperscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑅Λsuperscriptsubscript𝑙𝑃213r_{e}=\alpha\lambda_{e}\simeq(R_{\Lambda}^{*}l_{P}^{2})^{1/3}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_α italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ ( italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. We conclude therefore that the mass m𝑚mitalic_m and the length λCsubscript𝜆𝐶\lambda_{C}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT leading to the observed value of the cosmological constant in Zeldovich’s model II correspond to the typical mass and typical Compton wavelength of the electron (more precisely to me/αsubscript𝑚𝑒𝛼m_{e}/\alphaitalic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_α and αλe=re𝛼subscript𝜆𝑒subscript𝑟𝑒\alpha\lambda_{e}=r_{e}italic_α italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT).

Another formula has been obtained for the minimum uncertainty in the measure of the length of an object of size l𝑙litalic_l due to quantum fluctuations. According to Karolyhazy karolyhazy it is given by

δl(llP2)1/3.similar-to𝛿𝑙superscript𝑙superscriptsubscript𝑙𝑃213\delta l\sim(ll_{P}^{2})^{1/3}.italic_δ italic_l ∼ ( italic_l italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (202)

This is the condition that the device used to make the measurement does not turn into a black hole. This expression was later related to the holographic principle and to the theory of quantum information. The minimum total uncertainty in the measurement of a length equal to the size of the universe (lRΛsimilar-to𝑙superscriptsubscript𝑅Λl\sim R_{\Lambda}^{*}italic_l ∼ italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT), which is a consequence of combining the principles of quantum mechanics and general relativity, is given by

λmin=(RΛlP2)1/3=2.92×1015m,subscript𝜆minsuperscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑅Λsuperscriptsubscript𝑙𝑃2132.92superscript1015m\lambda_{\rm min}=(R_{\Lambda}^{*}l_{P}^{2})^{1/3}=2.92\times 10^{-15}\,{\rm m},italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 2.92 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m , (203)

which corresponds to Eq. (200). This minimum length is larger than the Planck length lP=1.62×1035msubscript𝑙𝑃1.62superscript1035ml_{P}=1.62\times 10^{-35}\,{\rm m}italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.62 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 35 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m showing that quantum gravity is not a Planck scale phenomenon.

In Model II of Sec. VII.5 we have identified the primordial (maximum) density of the universe with the electron density ρesubscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{e}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This was justified by applying the same Lagrangian (79) of nonlinear electrodynamics both to the magnetic universe (see Sec. VII.5) and to the electron (see Sec. XI). Then, we have shown that the universe starts with a size R(0)=re𝑅0subscript𝑟𝑒R(0)=r_{e}italic_R ( 0 ) = italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT equal to the classical radius of the electron at t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 and reaches a size R1=R~2subscript𝑅1subscript~𝑅2R_{1}={\tilde{R}}_{2}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = over~ start_ARG italic_R end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of the order of the radius of a dark energy star of the stellar mass at the end of the inflation of duration tc=23.8tesubscript𝑡𝑐23.8superscriptsubscript𝑡𝑒t_{c}=23.8\,t_{e}^{*}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 23.8 italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (see Sec. VII.5, Sec. X.4 and Appendix E).

Combining the above results, we conclude that the minimum length λminsubscript𝜆min\lambda_{\rm min}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Zeldovich’s model II leading to the correct value of the cosmological constant corresponds to:

(i) the classical radius of the electron [Eqs. (200) and (201)].

(ii) the limit on the measurability of spacetime distances [Eq. (203)] in quantum gravity according to Karolyhazy karolyhazy .

(iii) The radius of the universe at the begining of the inflation in model II of Sec. VII.5 [Eq. (265)]. This radius defines an absolute “minimum” length re=2.82×1015msubscript𝑟𝑒2.82superscript1015mr_{e}=2.82\times 10^{-15}\,{\rm m}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2.82 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m which could replace the Planck length lP=1.62×1035msubscript𝑙𝑃1.62superscript1035ml_{P}=1.62\times 10^{-35}\,{\rm m}italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.62 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 35 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m and yield the correct value of the vacuum energy density when substituted into Eq. (198).

In conclusion, if we identify λminsubscript𝜆min\lambda_{\rm min}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to the classical radius of the electron in Zeldovich’s model II, we can express the radius resubscript𝑟𝑒r_{e}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the Compton wavelength λesubscript𝜆𝑒\lambda_{e}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the mass mesubscript𝑚𝑒m_{e}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of the electron as a function of the cosmological constant [see Eqs. (199)-(201)] and we justify the mysterious Eddington relation eddington1931lambda ; ouf . Conversely, we can express the cosmological constant in terms of resubscript𝑟𝑒r_{e}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, λesubscript𝜆𝑒\lambda_{e}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT or mesubscript𝑚𝑒m_{e}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and, by using the empirical value of the mass of the electron, we can explain the measured value of ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ [see Eq. (4)]. The physical reason to identify λminsubscript𝜆min\lambda_{\rm min}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to the classical radius of the electron is that it corresponds to the initial radius of the universe at t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 according to the model of nonlinear electrodynamics based on the Lagrangian (79) provided that this model applies both to the early magnetic universe and to the electron.

XIII Conclusion

In this paper we have discussed the connection between the model of magnetic universe based on nonlinear electrodynamics introduced by Kruglov kruglov2015a ; kruglov2015 ; kruglov2020 and our model of universe based on a quadratic (or polytropic) equation of state chavanisAIP ; jgrav ; cosmopoly1 ; cosmopoly2 ; cosmopoly3 ; universe ; stiff ; mlbec ; chavanisIOP ; vacuumon . These models both predict a period of early inflation followed by a radiation era. These models are essentially equivalent since the equation of state introduced in chavanisAIP ; jgrav ; cosmopoly1 ; cosmopoly2 ; cosmopoly3 ; universe ; stiff ; mlbec ; chavanisIOP ; vacuumon can be deduced from the nonlinear electromagnetic Lagrangian introduced in kruglov2015a ; kruglov2015 ; kruglov2020 and vice versa. However, nonlinear electrodynamics might give a physical interpretation to our quadratic equation of state. It may arise from possible quantum gravity corrections to linear electrodynamics.

We have also generalized the nonlinear electromagnetic Lagrangian (79) by including a zero-point energy [see Eq. (141)] so that it describes a form of “generalized radiation” chavanisAIP ; jgrav ; cosmopoly1 ; cosmopoly2 ; cosmopoly3 ; universe ; stiff ; mlbec ; chavanisIOP ; vacuumon that accounts simultaneously for the early inflation, the ordinary radiation, and the dark energy. Baryonic matter and dark matter are added as independent species. This leads to a complete model of universe (see Sec. X). This model essentially coincides with the ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM model but it includes a period of early inflation. The density decreases from a maximum density ρIsubscript𝜌𝐼\rho_{I}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT equal to the Planck density ρPsubscript𝜌𝑃\rho_{P}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT or to the electron density ρesubscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{e}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT up to a minimum density ρΛsubscript𝜌Λ\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT equal to the cosmological density (see Fig. 3). In this sense, it connects two de Sitter eras of accelerating expansion separated by a radiation era and a matter era of decelerated expansion (see Fig. 2).222222In this paper, we have considered a model similar to the ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM model where the dark energy density is constant (n=1𝑛1n=-1italic_n = - 1) but, following cosmopoly2 ; cosmopoly3 , we could consider more general models where the dark energy density varies with time (see Secs. VI and VIII with n<0𝑛0n<0italic_n < 0 and n1𝑛1n\neq-1italic_n ≠ - 1). There is, however, a difficulty with such models when interpreted in terms of nonlinear electrodynamics as pointed out in Sec. VI.2.

By applying the nonlinear electrodynamics to the electron in the spirit of the Born-Infeld model born1933 ; borninfeld , following Kruglov kruglov2015a , we have obtained an extended model of electron and justified the fact that the electron may have a finite radius and a finite density like in the Abraham-Lorentz model abraham ; lorentz . Indeed, in this model, the electric field is nonsingular at the origin and the electric energy is finite.232323When the Lagrangian (167) is applied to the electron, we find that the electric field E(r)𝐸𝑟E(r)italic_E ( italic_r ) is finite at r=0𝑟0r=0italic_r = 0. By contrast, in cosmology, the magnetic field B1/a2similar-to𝐵1superscript𝑎2B\sim 1/a^{2}italic_B ∼ 1 / italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT diverges when a0𝑎0a\rightarrow 0italic_a → 0. By identifying the electrostatic energy with the mass of the electron we can obtain the electron radius and the electron density. This determines the fundamental density ρsubscript𝜌\rho_{*}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, or the fundamental length rsubscript𝑟r_{*}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in the nonlinear electromagnetic Lagrangian (see Sec. XI). Then, by applying the same nonlinear electromagnetic Lagrangian to cosmology we have shown that the initial density of the universe is equal to the electron density ρesubscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{e}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, its initial radius is equal to the electron radius resubscript𝑟𝑒r_{e}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and its initial mass is equal to the electron mass mesubscript𝑚𝑒m_{e}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. We have then interpreted the radius of the electron as a fundamental minimum length and we have mentioned the connection with the result of Karolyhazy karolyhazy in quantum gravity. By introducing this minimum length in the second Zeldovich zeldovich ; zeldovichA formula of vacuum energy [see Eq. (198)] we have obtained a refined Eddington relation between the cosmological constant and the mass of the electron [see Eq. (4)]. This relation provides the exact (or almost exact) value of the cosmological constant. We have thus justified the Eddington relation eddington1931lambda ; ouf and the value of the cosmological constant from nonlinear electrodynamics. This is a true prediction of the cosmological constant without free parameter since the mass of the electron is experimentally known. We have also shown that this cosmological model produces 1083superscript108310^{83}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 83 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT electrons or 1080superscript108010^{80}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 80 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT protons in the present universe, which is precisely the Eddington number eddington1931lambda ; ouf .

We have considered another model in which the initial density of the universe is equal to the Planck density ρPsubscript𝜌𝑃\rho_{P}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, its initial radius is equal to the Planck length lPsubscript𝑙𝑃l_{P}italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and its initial mass is equal to the Planck mass MPsubscript𝑀𝑃M_{P}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. We have shown that the radius of the universe at the end of the inflation is equal to the Compton wavelength of the neutrino rνsubscript𝑟𝜈r_{\nu}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT introduced in ouf . We have then interpreted this radius as an effective fundamental minimum length and we have mentioned the connection with the result of Amelino-Camelia gacnature in quantum gravity. Then, by introducing this minimum length in the first Zeldovich zeldovich ; zeldovichA formula of vacuum energy [see Eq. (192)] we have obtained the correct value of the cosmological constant [see Eq. (3)]. However, this is not a true prediction of ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ since the mass of the neutrino is not firmly known. Indeed, in ouf it has been precisely determined in terms of the cosmological constant.

In the two models of inflation described above the e𝑒eitalic_e-folding number is the same, N0=68.5subscript𝑁068.5N_{0}=68.5italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 68.5, corresponding to an increase of the size of the universe by 30303030 orders of magnitude between the begining and the end of the inflation. However, the duration of the inflation is very different. In Model I (where the initial density is equal to the Planck density ρP=5.16×1099gm3subscript𝜌𝑃5.16superscript1099gsuperscriptm3\rho_{P}=5.16\times 10^{99}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5.16 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 99 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) the size of the universe increases from the Planck length lP=1.62×1035msubscript𝑙𝑃1.62superscript1035ml_{P}=1.62\times 10^{-35}\,{\rm m}italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.62 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 35 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m to the Compton wavelength of the neutrino rν=3.91×105msubscript𝑟𝜈3.91superscript105mr_{\nu}=3.91\times 10^{-5}\,{\rm m}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3.91 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m on a timescale tc=23.8tP=1.28×1042ssubscript𝑡𝑐23.8subscript𝑡𝑃1.28superscript1042st_{c}=23.8\,t_{P}=1.28\times 10^{-42}\,{\rm s}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 23.8 italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.28 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 42 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s. In Model II (where the initial density is equal to the electron density ρe=4.07×1016gm3subscript𝜌𝑒4.07superscript1016gsuperscriptm3\rho_{e}=4.07\times 10^{16}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4.07 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 16 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) the size of the universe increases from the classical electron radius re=2.82×1015msubscript𝑟𝑒2.82superscript1015mr_{e}=2.82\times 10^{-15}\,{\rm m}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2.82 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m to the radius R~2=7.07×1015msubscript~𝑅27.07superscript1015m{\tilde{R}}_{2}=7.07\times 10^{15}\,{\rm m}over~ start_ARG italic_R end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 7.07 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m of a dark energy star of the stellar mass on a timescale tc=23.8te=0.457ssubscript𝑡𝑐23.8superscriptsubscript𝑡𝑒0.457st_{c}=23.8\,t_{e}^{*}=0.457\,{\rm s}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 23.8 italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.457 roman_s. We also note that the fundamental minimum length, which gives the correct value of the cosmological constant when introduced in the Zeldovich formula of vacuum energy, is different in the two models. In Model I it corresponds to the Compton wavelength of the neutrino which is equal to the size of the universe at the end of the inflation and in Model II it corresponds to the classical radius of the electron which is equal to the size of the universe at the begining of the inflation. In the two cases, the fundamental minimum length is much larger than the Planck length suggesting that quantum gravity is not a Planck scale phenomenon. It would be interesting to know if observations favor one model over the other.

Appendix A The logotropic model

In a series of papers epjp ; lettre ; jcap ; preouf1 ; action ; logosf ; preouf2 we have developed a model of unified dark matter and dark energy based on the logotropic equation of state

P=Aln(ρρP),𝑃𝐴𝜌subscript𝜌𝑃\displaystyle P=A\ln\left(\frac{\rho}{\rho_{P}}\right),italic_P = italic_A roman_ln ( divide start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) , (204)

where A𝐴Aitalic_A is a new fundamental constant of physics and ρP=c5/G2=5.16×1099gm3subscript𝜌𝑃superscript𝑐5superscript𝐺2Planck-constant-over-2-pi5.16superscript1099gsuperscriptm3\rho_{P}=c^{5}/G^{2}\hbar=5.16\times 10^{99}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ = 5.16 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 99 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the Planck density. The constant A𝐴Aitalic_A can be interpreted as a sort of “logotropic temperature” in a generalized thermodynamical framework epjp ; lettre ; jcap . This model leads to dark matter halos with a density profile that is flat at the center (thereby solving the core-cusp problem of the CDM model) and that decreases at large distances as

ρ(A8πG)1/21r.similar-to𝜌superscript𝐴8𝜋𝐺121𝑟\displaystyle\rho\sim\left(\frac{A}{8\pi G}\right)^{1/2}\frac{1}{r}.italic_ρ ∼ ( divide start_ARG italic_A end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_G end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_r end_ARG . (205)

At even larger distances the density falls like r2superscript𝑟2r^{-2}italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (isothermal profile) or like r3superscript𝑟3r^{-3}italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (NFW and Burkert profiles), or even more rapidly in order to have a finite mass. This confinement may result from an incomplete relaxation preouf2 ; logosf . The logotropic model implies that the dark matter halos (“small” scales) have a universal surface density given by

Σ0=ρ0rh=5.85(A4πG)1/2,subscriptΣ0subscript𝜌0subscript𝑟5.85superscript𝐴4𝜋𝐺12\displaystyle\Sigma_{0}=\rho_{0}r_{h}=5.85\,\left(\frac{A}{4\pi G}\right)^{1/2},roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5.85 ( divide start_ARG italic_A end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_π italic_G end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (206)

where the prefactor is deduced from the theory (here ρ0subscript𝜌0\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the central density and rhsubscript𝑟r_{h}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the halo radius where the central density is divided by 4444). By applying the logotropic equation of state (204) to the universe as a whole (“large” scales) we found that the universal constant A𝐴Aitalic_A is related to the present value of the dark energy density ρΛρde,0=5.96×1024gm3subscript𝜌Λsubscript𝜌de05.96superscript1024gsuperscriptm3\rho_{\Lambda}\equiv\rho_{\rm de,0}=5.96\times 10^{-24}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_de , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5.96 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 24 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT by

A/c2=ρΛln(ρPρΛ)=2.10×1026gm3.𝐴superscript𝑐2subscript𝜌Λsubscript𝜌𝑃subscript𝜌Λ2.10superscript1026gsuperscriptm3\displaystyle{A}/{c^{2}}=\frac{\rho_{\Lambda}}{\ln\left(\frac{\rho_{P}}{\rho_{% \Lambda}}\right)}=2.10\times 10^{-26}\,{\rm g}\,{\rm m}^{-3}.italic_A / italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_ln ( divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) end_ARG = 2.10 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 26 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (207)

Using ρΛ=Λc2/8πGsubscript𝜌ΛΛsuperscript𝑐28𝜋𝐺\rho_{\Lambda}=\Lambda c^{2}/8\pi Gitalic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_Λ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 8 italic_π italic_G with Λ=1.11×1052m2Λ1.11superscript1052superscriptm2\Lambda=1.11\times 10^{-52}\,{\rm m^{-2}}roman_Λ = 1.11 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 52 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, we can rewrite the foregoing equation as

A=1.40×104c4ΛG.𝐴1.40superscript104superscript𝑐4Λ𝐺\displaystyle A=1.40\times 10^{-4}\,\frac{c^{4}\Lambda}{G}.italic_A = 1.40 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Λ end_ARG start_ARG italic_G end_ARG . (208)

This allows us to express the universal surface density of dark matter halos in terms of the cosmological constant ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ of the ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM model by

Σ0=0.01955c2ΛG=133M/pc2.subscriptΣ00.01955superscript𝑐2Λ𝐺133subscript𝑀direct-productsuperscriptpc2\displaystyle\Sigma_{0}=0.01955\,\frac{c^{2}\sqrt{\Lambda}}{G}=133\,M_{\odot}/% {\rm pc}^{2}.roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.01955 divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_G end_ARG = 133 italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_pc start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (209)

This value turns out to be in good agreement with the observational value Σ0obs=14152+83M/pc2superscriptsubscriptΣ0obssuperscriptsubscript1415283subscript𝑀direct-productsuperscriptpc2\Sigma_{0}^{\rm obs}=141_{-52}^{+83}\,M_{\odot}/{\rm pc}^{2}roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_obs end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 141 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 52 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 83 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_pc start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT donato . The average surface density of dark matter halos is Σ=Mh/(πrh2)=0.474Σ0=63.1M/pc2delimited-⟨⟩Σsubscript𝑀𝜋superscriptsubscript𝑟20.474subscriptΣ063.1subscript𝑀direct-productsuperscriptpc2\langle\Sigma\rangle=M_{h}/(\pi r_{h}^{2})=0.474\,\Sigma_{0}=63.1\,M_{\odot}/{% \rm pc}^{2}⟨ roman_Σ ⟩ = italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ( italic_π italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) = 0.474 roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 63.1 italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_pc start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT where the prefactor in the second equality is deduced from the theory. It is in good agreement with the observational value Σobs=0.51Σ0obs=7227+42M/pc2subscriptdelimited-⟨⟩Σobs0.51superscriptsubscriptΣ0obssuperscriptsubscript722742subscript𝑀direct-productsuperscriptpc2\langle\Sigma\rangle_{\rm obs}=0.51\,\Sigma_{0}^{\rm obs}=72_{-27}^{+42}\,M_{% \odot}/{\rm pc}^{2}⟨ roman_Σ ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_obs end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.51 roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_obs end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 72 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 27 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 42 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_pc start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT gentile . The logotropic model therefore implies a universal gravitational acceleration

g=GMhrh2=πGΣ=1.49GΣ0.𝑔𝐺subscript𝑀superscriptsubscript𝑟2𝜋𝐺delimited-⟨⟩Σ1.49𝐺subscriptΣ0\displaystyle g=\frac{GM_{h}}{r_{h}^{2}}=\pi G\langle\Sigma\rangle=1.49\,G% \Sigma_{0}.italic_g = divide start_ARG italic_G italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = italic_π italic_G ⟨ roman_Σ ⟩ = 1.49 italic_G roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (210)

Using Eq. (209) the universal gravitational acceleration can be expressed in terms of the cosmological constant as

g=0.0291c2Λ=2.76×1011ms2.𝑔0.0291superscript𝑐2Λ2.76superscript1011msuperscripts2\displaystyle g=0.0291\,c^{2}\sqrt{\Lambda}=2.76\times 10^{-11}\,{\rm m\,s^{-2% }}.italic_g = 0.0291 italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG = 2.76 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (211)

This value is in good agreement with the observational value gobs=πGΣobs=3.21.2+1.8×1011m/s2subscript𝑔obs𝜋𝐺subscriptdelimited-⟨⟩Σobssuperscriptsubscript3.21.21.8superscript1011msuperscripts2g_{\rm obs}=\pi G\langle\Sigma\rangle_{\rm obs}=3.2_{-1.2}^{+1.8}\times 10^{-1% 1}\,{\rm m/s^{2}}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_obs end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_π italic_G ⟨ roman_Σ ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_obs end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3.2 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1.2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1.8 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m / roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT gentile .

Using the foregoing relations, the asymptotic behavior of the logotropic density can be rewritten as

ρ0.121Σ0r0.0811gGr0.00236c2ΛGr.similar-to𝜌0.121subscriptΣ0𝑟similar-to0.0811𝑔𝐺𝑟similar-to0.00236superscript𝑐2Λ𝐺𝑟\displaystyle\rho\sim 0.121\,\frac{\Sigma_{0}}{r}\sim 0.0811\,\frac{g}{Gr}\sim 0% .00236\,\frac{c^{2}\sqrt{\Lambda}}{Gr}.italic_ρ ∼ 0.121 divide start_ARG roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r end_ARG ∼ 0.0811 divide start_ARG italic_g end_ARG start_ARG italic_G italic_r end_ARG ∼ 0.00236 divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_G italic_r end_ARG . (212)

As noted in logosf this r1superscript𝑟1r^{-1}italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT behavior is similar to the density cusp in the NFW model ρ=ρsrs/[r(1+r/rs)2]ρsrs/r𝜌subscript𝜌𝑠subscript𝑟𝑠delimited-[]𝑟superscript1𝑟subscript𝑟𝑠2similar-tosubscript𝜌𝑠subscript𝑟𝑠𝑟\rho=\rho_{s}r_{s}/[r(1+r/r_{s})^{2}]\sim\rho_{s}r_{s}/ritalic_ρ = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / [ italic_r ( 1 + italic_r / italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] ∼ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_r. We find that

ρsrs=0.121Σ0=0.0811gG=0.00236c2ΛG=16.0M/pc2.subscript𝜌𝑠subscript𝑟𝑠0.121subscriptΣ00.0811𝑔𝐺0.00236superscript𝑐2Λ𝐺16.0subscript𝑀direct-productsuperscriptpc2\displaystyle\rho_{s}r_{s}=0.121\,\Sigma_{0}=0.0811\,\frac{g}{G}=0.00236\,% \frac{c^{2}\sqrt{\Lambda}}{G}=16.0\,M_{\odot}/{\rm pc}^{2}.italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.121 roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.0811 divide start_ARG italic_g end_ARG start_ARG italic_G end_ARG = 0.00236 divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_G end_ARG = 16.0 italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_pc start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (213)

We also noticed preouf1 ; preouf2 that the surface density Σ0=133M/pc2subscriptΣ0133subscript𝑀direct-productsuperscriptpc2\Sigma_{0}=133\,M_{\odot}/{\rm pc}^{2}roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 133 italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_pc start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT of dark matter halos (and the surface density of the universe ΣΛ=c2Λ/G=6800M/pc2subscriptΣΛsuperscript𝑐2Λ𝐺6800subscript𝑀direct-productsuperscriptpc2\Sigma_{\Lambda}=c^{2}\sqrt{\Lambda}/G=6800\,M_{\odot}/{\rm pc}^{2}roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG / italic_G = 6800 italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_pc start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) is of the same order as the surface density of the electron

Σe=mere2=54.9M/pc2.subscriptΣ𝑒subscript𝑚𝑒superscriptsubscript𝑟𝑒254.9subscript𝑀direct-productsuperscriptpc2\displaystyle\Sigma_{e}=\frac{m_{e}}{r_{e}^{2}}=54.9\,M_{\odot}/{\rm pc^{2}}.roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = 54.9 italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_pc start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (214)

Using the accurate Eddington relation (238) we find that

Σeαc2ΛGαΣΛ0.373Σ0.similar-to-or-equalssubscriptΣ𝑒𝛼superscript𝑐2Λ𝐺similar-to-or-equals𝛼subscriptΣΛsimilar-to-or-equals0.373subscriptΣ0\displaystyle\Sigma_{e}\simeq\alpha\frac{c^{2}\sqrt{\Lambda}}{G}\simeq\alpha% \Sigma_{\Lambda}\simeq 0.373\,\Sigma_{0}.roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ italic_α divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_G end_ARG ≃ italic_α roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ 0.373 roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (215)

This relation may be interpreted in terms of the holographic principle preouf1 ; ouf .

The circular velocity at the halo radius is

vh2=GMhrh.superscriptsubscript𝑣2𝐺subscript𝑀subscript𝑟\displaystyle v_{h}^{2}=\frac{GM_{h}}{r_{h}}.italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_G italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG . (216)

Combining the foregoing relations, we find that

vh4Mh=Gg=πΣG2=1.49Σ0G2.superscriptsubscript𝑣4subscript𝑀𝐺𝑔𝜋delimited-⟨⟩Σsuperscript𝐺21.49subscriptΣ0superscript𝐺2\displaystyle\frac{v_{h}^{4}}{M_{h}}=Gg=\pi\langle\Sigma\rangle G^{2}=1.49\,% \Sigma_{0}G^{2}.divide start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = italic_G italic_g = italic_π ⟨ roman_Σ ⟩ italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1.49 roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (217)

This relation is connected to the Tully-Fisher relation tf ; tfmcgaugh which involves the baryon mass Mbsubscript𝑀𝑏M_{b}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT instead of the DM halo mass Mhsubscript𝑀M_{h}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Introducing the baryon fraction fb=Mb/Mh0.17subscript𝑓𝑏subscript𝑀𝑏subscript𝑀similar-to0.17f_{b}=M_{b}/M_{h}\sim 0.17italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 0.17, we obtain (Mb/vh4)th=fb/(1.49Σ0G2)=46.4Mkm4s4superscriptsubscript𝑀bsuperscriptsubscript𝑣4thsubscript𝑓𝑏1.49subscriptΣ0superscript𝐺246.4subscript𝑀direct-productsuperscriptkm4superscripts4(M_{\rm b}/v_{h}^{4})^{\rm th}=f_{b}/(1.49\,\Sigma_{0}G^{2})=46.4\,M_{\odot}{% \rm km}^{-4}{\rm s}^{4}( italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_th end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ( 1.49 roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) = 46.4 italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_km start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT which is close to the observed value (Mb/vh4)obs=47±6Mkm4s4superscriptsubscript𝑀bsuperscriptsubscript𝑣4obsplus-or-minus476subscript𝑀direct-productsuperscriptkm4superscripts4(M_{\rm b}/v_{h}^{4})^{\rm obs}=47\pm 6\,M_{\odot}{\rm km}^{-4}{\rm s}^{4}( italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_obs end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 47 ± 6 italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_km start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mcgaugh .

More generally, the rotation curve is given by

v2(r)=GM(r)r.superscript𝑣2𝑟𝐺𝑀𝑟𝑟\displaystyle v^{2}(r)=\frac{GM(r)}{r}.italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r ) = divide start_ARG italic_G italic_M ( italic_r ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_r end_ARG . (218)

For r+𝑟r\rightarrow+\inftyitalic_r → + ∞, we have

M(r)2π(A8πG)1/2r20.760Σ0r20.510gr2G0.0148c2Λr2Gsimilar-to𝑀𝑟2𝜋superscript𝐴8𝜋𝐺12superscript𝑟2similar-to0.760subscriptΣ0superscript𝑟2similar-to0.510𝑔superscript𝑟2𝐺similar-to0.0148superscript𝑐2Λsuperscript𝑟2𝐺\displaystyle M(r)\sim 2\pi\left(\frac{A}{8\pi G}\right)^{1/2}r^{2}\sim 0.760% \,\Sigma_{0}r^{2}\sim 0.510\,\frac{gr^{2}}{G}\sim 0.0148\,\frac{c^{2}\sqrt{% \Lambda}r^{2}}{G}italic_M ( italic_r ) ∼ 2 italic_π ( divide start_ARG italic_A end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_G end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 0.760 roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 0.510 divide start_ARG italic_g italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_G end_ARG ∼ 0.0148 divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_G end_ARG (219)

and

v2(r)2πG(A8πG)1/2r0.760GΣ0r0.510gr0.0148c2Λr.similar-tosuperscript𝑣2𝑟2𝜋𝐺superscript𝐴8𝜋𝐺12𝑟similar-to0.760𝐺subscriptΣ0𝑟similar-to0.510𝑔𝑟similar-to0.0148superscript𝑐2Λ𝑟\displaystyle v^{2}(r)\sim 2\pi G\left(\frac{A}{8\pi G}\right)^{1/2}r\sim 0.76% 0\,G\Sigma_{0}r\sim 0.510\,gr\sim 0.0148\,c^{2}\sqrt{\Lambda}r.italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r ) ∼ 2 italic_π italic_G ( divide start_ARG italic_A end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_G end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r ∼ 0.760 italic_G roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r ∼ 0.510 italic_g italic_r ∼ 0.0148 italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG italic_r . (220)

Asymptotically, the gravitational acceleration (the gravitational force F(r)=mg(r)𝐹𝑟𝑚𝑔𝑟F(r)=mg(r)italic_F ( italic_r ) = italic_m italic_g ( italic_r ) by unit of mass) produced by the logotropic distribution tends to a constant

g(r)=dΦdr=GM(r)r20.510g=g.𝑔𝑟𝑑Φ𝑑𝑟𝐺𝑀𝑟superscript𝑟20.510𝑔subscript𝑔\displaystyle g(r)=\frac{d\Phi}{dr}=\frac{GM(r)}{r^{2}}\rightarrow 0.510\,g=g_% {\infty}.italic_g ( italic_r ) = divide start_ARG italic_d roman_Φ end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_r end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_G italic_M ( italic_r ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG → 0.510 italic_g = italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (221)

The gravitational potential behaves as Φ(r)grsimilar-toΦ𝑟subscript𝑔𝑟\Phi(r)\sim g_{\infty}rroman_Φ ( italic_r ) ∼ italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r. We find M(r)/M101(r/pc)2similar-to𝑀𝑟subscript𝑀direct-product101superscript𝑟pc2M(r)/M_{\odot}\sim 101\,(r/{\rm pc})^{2}italic_M ( italic_r ) / italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 101 ( italic_r / roman_pc ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, log(vkms1)=1.32+12log(rkpc)𝑣kmsuperscripts11.3212𝑟kpc\log(\frac{v}{\rm km\,s^{-1}})=1.32+\frac{1}{2}\log(\frac{r}{\rm kpc})roman_log ( divide start_ARG italic_v end_ARG start_ARG roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) = 1.32 + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG roman_log ( divide start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_ARG roman_kpc end_ARG ) and g=1.41×1011ms2subscript𝑔1.41superscript1011msuperscripts2g_{\infty}=1.41\times 10^{-11}\,{\rm m\,s^{-2}}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.41 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT to be compared with the observational expressions M(r)obs/M=200120+200(r/pc)2𝑀superscript𝑟obssubscript𝑀direct-productsuperscriptsubscript200120200superscript𝑟pc2M(r)^{\rm obs}/M_{\odot}=200_{-120}^{+200}\,(r/{\rm pc})^{2}italic_M ( italic_r ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_obs end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 200 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 120 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 200 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r / roman_pc ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, log(vobskms1)=1.470.19+0.15+0.5log(rkpc)subscript𝑣obskmsuperscripts1superscriptsubscript1.470.190.150.5𝑟kpc\log(\frac{v_{\rm obs}}{\rm km\,s^{-1}})=1.47_{-0.19}^{+0.15}+0.5\log(\frac{r}% {\rm kpc})roman_log ( divide start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_obs end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) = 1.47 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 0.19 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 0.15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 0.5 roman_log ( divide start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_ARG roman_kpc end_ARG ) and gobs=32+3×1011ms2superscriptsubscript𝑔obssuperscriptsubscript323superscript1011msuperscripts2g_{\infty}^{\rm obs}=3_{-2}^{+3}\times 10^{-11}\,{\rm m\,s^{-2}}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_obs end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 3 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT walker .

When the logotropic model is applied in a cosmological framework, the evolution of the density of the generalized radiation is given by epjp ; lettre ; jcap ; preouf1 ; action ; logosf ; preouf2

ρRad=ρI1+(aa1)4+ρΛ(1+3Blna),subscript𝜌Radsubscript𝜌𝐼1superscript𝑎subscript𝑎14subscript𝜌Λ13𝐵𝑎\displaystyle\rho_{\rm Rad}=\frac{\rho_{I}}{1+\left(\frac{a}{a_{1}}\right)^{4}% }+\rho_{\Lambda}(1+3B\ln a),italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 1 + ( divide start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 + 3 italic_B roman_ln italic_a ) , (222)

where B=A/(ρΛc2)=1/ln(ρP/ρΛ)=3.53×103𝐵𝐴subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐21subscript𝜌𝑃subscript𝜌Λ3.53superscript103B=A/(\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2})=1/\ln(\rho_{P}/\rho_{\Lambda})=3.53\times 10^{-3}italic_B = italic_A / ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) = 1 / roman_ln ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = 3.53 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. In the logotropic model, the density of dark energy increases slowly (logarithmically) with the scale factor. This corresponds to a phantom caldwell ; cosmopoly3 behavior leading to a little rip littlerip (the energy density and the scale factor become infinite in infinite time). The model of Sec. IX, where the dark energy density is constant, is recovered for B=0𝐵0B=0italic_B = 0. Using Eqs. (55) and (61) the nonlinear electromagnetic Lagrangian inspired by the logotropic model is

=1+ρIc2ρΛc234BρΛc2ln().1subscript𝜌𝐼superscript𝑐2subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐234𝐵subscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐2subscript\displaystyle{\cal L}=\frac{-{\cal F}}{1+\frac{{\cal F}}{\rho_{I}c^{2}}}-\rho_% {\Lambda}c^{2}-\frac{3}{4}B\rho_{\Lambda}c^{2}\ln\left(\frac{{\cal F}_{*}}{% \cal F}\right).caligraphic_L = divide start_ARG - caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG 1 + divide start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG italic_B italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ln ( divide start_ARG caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG ) . (223)

Remark: The above results can be expressed in terms of the present value of the Hubble parameter H0=(8πGρ0/3)1/2=2.195×1018s1subscript𝐻0superscript8𝜋𝐺subscript𝜌03122.195superscript1018superscripts1H_{0}=(8\pi G\rho_{0}/3)^{1/2}=2.195\times 10^{-18}\,{\rm s}^{-1}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( 8 italic_π italic_G italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 3 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 2.195 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 18 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT instead of the cosmological constant by using the relation ρΛ=ΩΛ,0ρ0subscript𝜌ΛsubscriptΩΛ0subscript𝜌0\rho_{\Lambda}=\Omega_{\Lambda,0}\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with ΩΛ,0=0.6911subscriptΩΛ00.6911\Omega_{\Lambda,0}=0.6911roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.6911 giving

Λc2=3ΩΛ,0H02=2.07H02.Λsuperscript𝑐23subscriptΩΛ0superscriptsubscript𝐻022.07superscriptsubscript𝐻02\displaystyle\Lambda c^{2}=3\Omega_{\Lambda,0}H_{0}^{2}=2.07\,H_{0}^{2}.roman_Λ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 3 roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 2.07 italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (224)

For example, the universal surface density can be written as Σ0=0.02815H0c/GsubscriptΣ00.02815subscript𝐻0𝑐𝐺\Sigma_{0}=0.02815H_{0}c/Groman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.02815 italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c / italic_G and the universal gravitational acceleration can be written as g=0.0419H0c𝑔0.0419subscript𝐻0𝑐g=0.0419\,H_{0}citalic_g = 0.0419 italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c. This relation explains why the fundamental constant a0=g/fbsubscript𝑎0𝑔subscript𝑓𝑏a_{0}=g/f_{b}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_g / italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT that appears in the MOND (modification of Newtonian dynamics) theory mond is of order a0H0c/4=1.65×1010m/s2similar-to-or-equalssubscript𝑎0subscript𝐻0𝑐41.65superscript1010msuperscripts2a_{0}\simeq H_{0}c/4=1.65\times 10^{-10}\,{\rm m/s^{2}}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c / 4 = 1.65 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 10 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m / roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in good agreement with the observational value a0obs=(1.3±0.3)×1010m/s2superscriptsubscript𝑎0obsplus-or-minus1.30.3superscript1010msuperscripts2a_{0}^{\rm obs}=(1.3\pm 0.3)\times 10^{-10}\,{\rm m/s^{2}}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_obs end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( 1.3 ± 0.3 ) × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 10 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m / roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Note, however, that our model is completely different from the MOND theory.

Appendix B The mass of the universe

B.1 Cosmological scales

The empirical value of the cosmological constant deduced from the observation of the accelerated expansion of the universe is Λ=1.11×1052m2Λ1.11superscript1052superscriptm2\Lambda=1.11\times 10^{-52}\,{\rm m^{-2}}roman_Λ = 1.11 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 52 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. By using general arguments based on physical considerations and dimensional analysis, we can introduce cosmological scales. The cosmological density ρΛ=Λc2/G=1.50×1022gm3superscriptsubscript𝜌ΛΛsuperscript𝑐2𝐺1.50superscript1022gsuperscriptm3\rho_{\Lambda}^{*}=\Lambda c^{2}/G=1.50\times 10^{-22}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = roman_Λ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_G = 1.50 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 22 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is of the order of the density of the universe, the cosmological time tΛ=1/(GρΛ)1/2=1/(cΛ)=3.16×1017ssuperscriptsubscript𝑡Λ1superscript𝐺superscriptsubscript𝜌Λ121𝑐Λ3.16superscript1017st_{\Lambda}^{*}=1/(G\rho_{\Lambda}^{*})^{1/2}=1/(c\sqrt{\Lambda})=3.16\times 1% 0^{17}\,{\rm s}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1 / ( italic_G italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1 / ( italic_c square-root start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG ) = 3.16 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 17 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s is of the order of the age of the universe, the cosmological length RΛ=ctΛ=1/Λ=9.49×1025msuperscriptsubscript𝑅Λ𝑐superscriptsubscript𝑡Λ1Λ9.49superscript1025mR_{\Lambda}^{*}=ct_{\Lambda}^{*}=1/\sqrt{\Lambda}=9.49\times 10^{25}\,{\rm m}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_c italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1 / square-root start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG = 9.49 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 25 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m is of the order of the size of the visible universe (the distance travelled by a photon on a timescale tΛsuperscriptsubscript𝑡Λt_{\Lambda}^{*}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT), and the cosmological mass MΛ=ρΛRΛ3=c2/(GΛ)=1.28×1056gsuperscriptsubscript𝑀Λsuperscriptsubscript𝜌Λsuperscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑅Λ3superscript𝑐2𝐺Λ1.28superscript1056gM_{\Lambda}^{*}=\rho_{\Lambda}^{*}{R_{\Lambda}^{*}}^{3}=c^{2}/(G\sqrt{\Lambda}% )=1.28\times 10^{56}\,{\rm g}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / ( italic_G square-root start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG ) = 1.28 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 56 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g is of the order of the mass of the universe.242424These quantities are just orders of magnitude. They are given without any prefactor, and this is why they have been written with the symbol * (we have ρΛ=8πρΛsuperscriptsubscript𝜌Λ8𝜋subscript𝜌Λ\rho_{\Lambda}^{*}=8\pi\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 8 italic_π italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, tΛ=tΛ/8πsuperscriptsubscript𝑡Λsubscript𝑡Λ8𝜋t_{\Lambda}^{*}=t_{\Lambda}/\sqrt{8\pi}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / square-root start_ARG 8 italic_π end_ARG, RΛ=RΛ/8πsuperscriptsubscript𝑅Λsubscript𝑅Λ8𝜋R_{\Lambda}^{*}=R_{\Lambda}/\sqrt{8\pi}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / square-root start_ARG 8 italic_π end_ARG, and MΛ=MΛ/8πsuperscriptsubscript𝑀Λsubscript𝑀Λ8𝜋M_{\Lambda}^{*}=M_{\Lambda}/\sqrt{8\pi}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / square-root start_ARG 8 italic_π end_ARG). These relations can be derived from the Friedmann equations by using the fact that the present density of the universe is of the order of the cosmological density on account of the cosmic coincidence ouf . In astronomical units, tΛ=10.0Gyrssuperscriptsubscript𝑡Λ10.0Gyrst_{\Lambda}^{*}=10.0\,{\rm Gyrs}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 10.0 roman_Gyrs, RΛ=3.07Gpcsuperscriptsubscript𝑅Λ3.07GpcR_{\Lambda}^{*}=3.07\,{\rm Gpc}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 3.07 roman_Gpc and MΛ=6.42×1022Msuperscriptsubscript𝑀Λ6.42superscript1022subscript𝑀direct-productM_{\Lambda}^{*}=6.42\times 10^{22}\,M_{\odot}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 6.42 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 22 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The typical number of electrons in the universe is NeMΛ/me1083similar-tosubscript𝑁𝑒superscriptsubscript𝑀Λsubscript𝑚𝑒similar-tosuperscript1083N_{e}\sim{M_{\Lambda}^{*}}/{m_{e}}\sim 10^{83}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 83 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and the typical number of protons (Eddington’s number) is NpMΛ/mp1080similar-tosubscript𝑁𝑝superscriptsubscript𝑀Λsubscript𝑚𝑝similar-tosuperscript1080N_{p}\sim{M_{\Lambda}^{*}}/{m_{p}}\sim 10^{80}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 80 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.252525These estimates assume that the Universe is made only of electrons or protons, which is of course not correct. We should also take into account dark matter and dark energy. But, because of the cosmic coincidence, the density of baryonic matter, dark matter and dark energy is of the same order of magnitude at present so our estimates are meaningful. These quantities play an important role in the theory of large numbers ouf .

B.2 Evolution of the mass of the universe during the different epochs

We define the radius and the mass of the of the universe at time t𝑡titalic_t by

R(t)=a(t)RΛ,M(t)=ρ(t)R(t)3.formulae-sequence𝑅𝑡𝑎𝑡subscript𝑅Λ𝑀𝑡𝜌𝑡𝑅superscript𝑡3\displaystyle R(t)=a(t)R_{\Lambda},\qquad M(t)=\rho(t)R(t)^{3}.italic_R ( italic_t ) = italic_a ( italic_t ) italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_M ( italic_t ) = italic_ρ ( italic_t ) italic_R ( italic_t ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (225)

During the inflation era, the density of the universe is constant (ρ=ρI𝜌subscript𝜌𝐼\rho=\rho_{I}italic_ρ = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) and the mass of the universe increases as

M(t)=ρIR(t)3.𝑀𝑡subscript𝜌𝐼𝑅superscript𝑡3\displaystyle M(t)=\rho_{I}R(t)^{3}.italic_M ( italic_t ) = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R ( italic_t ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (226)

During the radiation era, the density of the universe decreases as ρR4similar-to𝜌superscript𝑅4\rho\sim R^{-4}italic_ρ ∼ italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and the mass of the universe decreases as

M(t)1R(t).similar-to𝑀𝑡1𝑅𝑡\displaystyle M(t)\sim\frac{1}{R(t)}.italic_M ( italic_t ) ∼ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_R ( italic_t ) end_ARG . (227)

During the matter era, the density of the universe decreases as ρR3similar-to𝜌superscript𝑅3\rho\sim R^{-3}italic_ρ ∼ italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and the mass of the universe is constant

M(t)=cst.𝑀𝑡cst\displaystyle M(t)={\rm cst}.italic_M ( italic_t ) = roman_cst . (228)

During the dark energy era, the density of the universe is constant (ρ=ρΛ𝜌subscript𝜌Λ\rho=\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) and the mass of the universe increases as

M(t)=ρΛR(t)3.𝑀𝑡subscript𝜌Λ𝑅superscript𝑡3\displaystyle M(t)=\rho_{\Lambda}R(t)^{3}.italic_M ( italic_t ) = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R ( italic_t ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (229)

The evolution of the mass of the universe as a function of the radius in Models I and II of Sec. VII.5 is plotted in Fig. 7.

Refer to caption
Figure 7: Evolution of the mass of the universe as a function of the radius in Model I (black) and Model II (red).

B.3 Model II

In Model II, the initial density of the universe is equal to the density of the electron: ρI=ρesubscript𝜌𝐼subscript𝜌𝑒\rho_{I}=\rho_{e}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The initial radius of the universe is equal to the radius of the electron (R(0)=re𝑅0subscript𝑟𝑒R(0)=r_{e}italic_R ( 0 ) = italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) and its initial mass is equal to the mass mesubscript𝑚𝑒m_{e}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of the electron (see Appendix E). At t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0, the primordial universe has the same characteristics as the electron but it is “unstable” and “explodes”. This picture can be viewed as a refinement of the “primeval atom” of Lemaître lemaitreNewton . Let us follow its expansion accross the ages. Between the begining and the end of the inflation, its radius increases by 30303030 orders of magnitude (see Appendix E). Therefore, at the end of the inflation, its radius is R11030resimilar-tosubscript𝑅1superscript1030subscript𝑟𝑒R_{1}\sim 10^{30}r_{e}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 30 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and its volume is R131090re3similar-tosuperscriptsubscript𝑅13superscript1090superscriptsubscript𝑟𝑒3R_{1}^{3}\sim 10^{90}r_{e}^{3}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 90 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Since its density is constant (ρρesimilar-to𝜌subscript𝜌𝑒\rho\sim\rho_{e}italic_ρ ∼ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) its mass at the end of the inflation (or at the begining of the radiation era) is M11090mesimilar-tosubscript𝑀1superscript1090subscript𝑚𝑒M_{1}\sim 10^{90}m_{e}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 90 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Between the end of the inflation (or the begining of the radiation era) and the time of radiation-matter equality, the radius of the universe passes from R1subscript𝑅1R_{1}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to Req=aeqRΛsubscript𝑅eqsubscript𝑎eqsubscript𝑅ΛR_{\rm eq}=a_{\rm eq}R_{\Lambda}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Using Eqs. (112) and (157), we find that Req/R1=aeq/a1107subscript𝑅eqsubscript𝑅1subscript𝑎eqsubscript𝑎1similar-tosuperscript107R_{\rm eq}/R_{1}=a_{\rm eq}/a_{1}\sim 10^{7}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 7 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Therefore, its radius increases by 7777 orders of magnitude. Using Eq. (227), we find that its mass at the time of radiation-matter equality is Meq107M11083mesimilar-tosubscript𝑀eqsuperscript107subscript𝑀1similar-tosuperscript1083subscript𝑚𝑒M_{\rm eq}\sim 10^{-7}M_{1}\sim 10^{83}m_{e}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 7 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 83 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

This mass remains constant during the matter era (see Eq. (228)) and may be identified with the present mass of the universe: MΛ1083mesimilar-tosubscript𝑀Λsuperscript1083subscript𝑚𝑒M_{\Lambda}\sim 10^{83}m_{e}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 83 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This shows that the mass of the universe is equal to Ne1083similar-tosubscript𝑁𝑒superscript1083N_{e}\sim 10^{83}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 83 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT electrons of mass mesubscript𝑚𝑒m_{e}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Since mp/me=1836subscript𝑚𝑝subscript𝑚𝑒1836m_{p}/m_{e}=1836italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1836, we find that the mass of the universe is equal to Np1080similar-tosubscript𝑁𝑝superscript1080N_{p}\sim 10^{80}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 80 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT protons of mass mpsubscript𝑚𝑝m_{p}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This justifies the Eddington number eddington1931lambda ; ouf . These results are in good agreement with the observations.

B.4 Model I

In Model I, the initial density of the universe is equal to the Planck density: ρI=ρPsubscript𝜌𝐼subscript𝜌𝑃\rho_{I}=\rho_{P}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The initial radius of the universe is equal to the Planck length (R(0)=lP𝑅0subscript𝑙𝑃R(0)=l_{P}italic_R ( 0 ) = italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) and its initial mass is equal to the Planck mass MPsubscript𝑀𝑃M_{P}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (see Appendix E). At t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0, the primordial universe has the same characteristics as a Planck black hole (or a “planckion” particle) but it is “unstable” and “explodes”. Let us follow its expansion accross the ages. Between the begining and the end of the inflation, its radius increases by 30303030 orders of magnitude (see Appendix E). Therefore, at the end of the inflation, its radius is R11030lPsimilar-tosubscript𝑅1superscript1030subscript𝑙𝑃R_{1}\sim 10^{30}l_{P}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 30 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which is of the order of the Compton wavelength of the neutrino, and its volume is R131090lP3similar-tosuperscriptsubscript𝑅13superscript1090superscriptsubscript𝑙𝑃3R_{1}^{3}\sim 10^{90}l_{P}^{3}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 90 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Since its density is constant (ρρPsimilar-to𝜌subscript𝜌𝑃\rho\sim\rho_{P}italic_ρ ∼ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) its mass at the end of the inflation (or at the begining of the radiation era) is M11090MPsimilar-tosubscript𝑀1superscript1090subscript𝑀𝑃M_{1}\sim 10^{90}M_{P}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 90 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Between the end of the inflation (or the begining of the radiation era) and the time of radiation-matter equality, the radius of the universe passes from R1subscript𝑅1R_{1}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to Req=aeqRΛsubscript𝑅eqsubscript𝑎eqsubscript𝑅ΛR_{\rm eq}=a_{\rm eq}R_{\Lambda}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Using Eqs. (108) and (157), we find that Req/R1=aeq/a11028subscript𝑅eqsubscript𝑅1subscript𝑎eqsubscript𝑎1similar-tosuperscript1028R_{\rm eq}/R_{1}=a_{\rm eq}/a_{1}\sim 10^{28}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 28 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Therefore, its radius increases by 28282828 orders of magnitude. Using Eq. (227), we find that its mass at the time of radiation-matter equality is Meq1028M11062MPsimilar-tosubscript𝑀eqsuperscript1028subscript𝑀1similar-tosuperscript1062subscript𝑀𝑃M_{\rm eq}\sim 10^{-28}M_{1}\sim 10^{62}M_{P}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_eq end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 28 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 62 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

This mass remains constant during the matter era (see Eq. (228)) and may be identified with the present mass of the universe: MΛ1062MPsimilar-tosubscript𝑀Λsuperscript1062subscript𝑀𝑃M_{\Lambda}\sim 10^{62}M_{P}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 62 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This shows that the mass of the universe is equal to NP1062similar-tosubscript𝑁𝑃superscript1062N_{P}\sim 10^{62}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 62 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT particles of mass MPsubscript𝑀𝑃M_{P}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Although this result is quantitatively correct, no such particles of mass MPsubscript𝑀𝑃M_{P}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT exist in abundance in the universe. Therefore, this picture is not in agreement with the observations. This suggests that Model II may be more relevant than Model I.

Appendix C The electron

The classical radius resubscript𝑟𝑒r_{e}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of the electron is defined through the relation

E=mec2=e2re.𝐸subscript𝑚𝑒superscript𝑐2superscript𝑒2subscript𝑟𝑒\displaystyle E=m_{e}c^{2}=\frac{e^{2}}{r_{e}}.italic_E = italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG . (230)

This equation expresses the equality (in order of magnitude) between the rest-mass energy of the electron and its electrostatic energy, assuming that the electron has a certain size. This is a convenient manner to define the “radius” of the electron. This relation first appeared in the Abraham-Lorentz abraham ; lorentz model of the extended electron with an electromagnetic mass and later in the Born-Infeld born1933 ; borninfeld theory of nonlinear electrodynamics (see Appendix F of massmaxrel for a short review of these old theories). Recalling the value of the charge of the electron e=4.80×1013g1/2m3/2s1𝑒4.80superscript1013superscriptg12superscriptm32superscripts1e=4.80\times 10^{-13}\,{\rm g^{1/2}\,m^{3/2}\,s^{-1}}italic_e = 4.80 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 13 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and its mass me=9.11×1028g=0.511MeV/c2subscript𝑚𝑒9.11superscript1028g0.511MeVsuperscriptc2m_{e}=9.11\times 10^{-28}\,{\rm g}=0.511\,{\rm MeV/c^{2}}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 9.11 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 28 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g = 0.511 roman_MeV / roman_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, we obtain

re=e2mec2=2.82×1015m.subscript𝑟𝑒superscript𝑒2subscript𝑚𝑒superscript𝑐22.82superscript1015m\displaystyle r_{e}=\frac{e^{2}}{m_{e}c^{2}}=2.82\times 10^{-15}\,{\rm m}.italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = 2.82 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m . (231)

The Compton wavelength of the electron is λe=/(mec)=3.86×1013msubscript𝜆𝑒Planck-constant-over-2-pisubscript𝑚𝑒𝑐3.86superscript1013m\lambda_{e}=\hbar/(m_{e}c)=3.86\times 10^{-13}\,{\rm m}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_ℏ / ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c ) = 3.86 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 13 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m. It is related to the classical radius of the electron by

λe=reα137re,subscript𝜆𝑒subscript𝑟𝑒𝛼similar-to-or-equals137subscript𝑟𝑒\displaystyle\lambda_{e}=\frac{r_{e}}{\alpha}\simeq 137\,r_{e},italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_α end_ARG ≃ 137 italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (232)

where

α=e2c11377.30×103𝛼superscript𝑒2Planck-constant-over-2-pi𝑐similar-to-or-equals1137similar-to-or-equals7.30superscript103\displaystyle\alpha=\frac{e^{2}}{\hbar c}\simeq\frac{1}{137}\simeq 7.30\times 1% 0^{-3}italic_α = divide start_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_ℏ italic_c end_ARG ≃ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 137 end_ARG ≃ 7.30 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (233)

is Sommerfeld’s fine-structure constant.262626Since quantum effects enter at a distance of the order λesubscript𝜆𝑒\lambda_{e}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT which is much larger than resubscript𝑟𝑒r_{e}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, a purely classical electromagnetic model of the electron is not relevant. The typical electron density is

ρe=mere3=4.07×1016gm3.subscript𝜌𝑒subscript𝑚𝑒superscriptsubscript𝑟𝑒34.07superscript1016gsuperscriptm3\displaystyle\rho_{e}=\frac{m_{e}}{r_{e}^{3}}=4.07\times 10^{16}\,{\rm g\,m^{-% 3}}.italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = 4.07 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 16 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (234)

It can also be written as

ρe=me4c6e6=me4c3α33subscript𝜌𝑒superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑒4superscript𝑐6superscript𝑒6superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑒4superscript𝑐3superscript𝛼3superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi3\displaystyle\rho_{e}=\frac{m_{e}^{4}c^{6}}{e^{6}}=\frac{m_{e}^{4}c^{3}}{% \alpha^{3}\hbar^{3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG (235)

or as

ρe=αcre4.subscript𝜌𝑒𝛼Planck-constant-over-2-pi𝑐superscriptsubscript𝑟𝑒4\rho_{e}=\frac{\alpha\hbar}{cr_{e}^{4}}.italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_α roman_ℏ end_ARG start_ARG italic_c italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (236)

The characteristic (dynamical) time associated with the electron is

te=(mere3e2)1/2=e2mec3=rec=9.40×1024s.subscript𝑡𝑒superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑒superscriptsubscript𝑟𝑒3superscript𝑒212superscript𝑒2subscript𝑚𝑒superscript𝑐3subscript𝑟𝑒𝑐9.40superscript1024s\displaystyle t_{e}=\left(\frac{m_{e}r_{e}^{3}}{e^{2}}\right)^{1/2}=\frac{e^{2% }}{m_{e}c^{3}}=\frac{r_{e}}{c}=9.40\times 10^{-24}\,{\rm s}.italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_c end_ARG = 9.40 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 24 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_s . (237)

This is the time it takes for a light wave to travel accross the “size” of an electron. This timescale first appeared in the Abraham-Lorentz abraham ; lorentz theory of the extended electron when they tried to calculate the recoil force on an accelerated charged particle caused by the particle emitting electromagnetic radiation. It can be written as te=α/(mec2)subscript𝑡𝑒𝛼Planck-constant-over-2-pisubscript𝑚𝑒superscript𝑐2t_{e}=\alpha\hbar/(m_{e}c^{2})italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_α roman_ℏ / ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ). It is connected to the flight time in the relativistic extension of Nelson’s stochastic quantum mechanics nelson developed by Lehr and Park lp . This is what Caldirola chronon called the “chronon”, which is a sort of “quantum of time”. This is also the unit of time provided by the atomic constants that Dirac used in his cosmological theory based on a large number hypothesis dirac1 ; dirac2 ; ouf .

In ouf we have obtained an accurate formula that relates the mass of the electron to the cosmological constant:

meα(Λ4G2)1/6.similar-to-or-equalssubscript𝑚𝑒𝛼superscriptΛsuperscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi4superscript𝐺216m_{e}\simeq\alpha\left(\frac{\Lambda\hbar^{4}}{G^{2}}\right)^{1/6}.italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ italic_α ( divide start_ARG roman_Λ roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (238)

This equation can be viewed as an accurate form of Eddington formula eddington1931lambda ; ouf . The classical radius of the electron is then given in good approximation by

re(G22Λc6)1/6.similar-to-or-equalssubscript𝑟𝑒superscriptsuperscript𝐺2superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2Λsuperscript𝑐616r_{e}\simeq\left(\frac{G^{2}\hbar^{2}}{\Lambda c^{6}}\right)^{1/6}.italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ ( divide start_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Λ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (239)

With the empirical value Λ=1.11×1052m2Λ1.11superscript1052superscriptm2\Lambda=1.11\times 10^{-52}\,{\rm m^{-2}}roman_Λ = 1.11 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 52 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT of the cosmological constant deduced from the observations of the accelerated expansion of the universe we obtain the approximate value 8.80×1028g8.80superscript1028g8.80\times 10^{-28}\,{\rm g}8.80 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 28 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g for the mass of the electron which is very close to the measured value me=9.11×1028gsubscript𝑚𝑒9.11superscript1028gm_{e}=9.11\times 10^{-28}\,{\rm g}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 9.11 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 28 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g (similarly we get 2.92×1015m2.92superscript1015m2.92\times 10^{-15}\,{\rm m}2.92 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m for the classical radius of the electron which is very close to re=2.82×1015msubscript𝑟𝑒2.82superscript1015mr_{e}=2.82\times 10^{-15}\,{\rm m}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2.82 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m). Using Eq. (238) we find that

λe1α(G22Λc6)1/6,ρeα(Λ2c9G4)1/3,te(G22Λc12)1/6.formulae-sequencesimilar-to-or-equalssubscript𝜆𝑒1𝛼superscriptsuperscript𝐺2superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2Λsuperscript𝑐616formulae-sequencesimilar-to-or-equalssubscript𝜌𝑒𝛼superscriptsuperscriptΛ2superscript𝑐9superscript𝐺4Planck-constant-over-2-pi13similar-to-or-equalssubscript𝑡𝑒superscriptsuperscript𝐺2superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2Λsuperscript𝑐1216\lambda_{e}\simeq\frac{1}{\alpha}\left(\frac{G^{2}\hbar^{2}}{\Lambda c^{6}}% \right)^{1/6},\qquad\rho_{e}\simeq\alpha\left(\frac{\Lambda^{2}c^{9}}{G^{4}% \hbar}\right)^{1/3},\qquad t_{e}\simeq\left(\frac{G^{2}\hbar^{2}}{\Lambda c^{1% 2}}\right)^{1/6}.italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_α end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Λ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ italic_α ( divide start_ARG roman_Λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ ( divide start_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Λ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 12 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (240)

In ouf we have developed the theory of large numbers pioneered by Weyl, Eddington and Dirac. We have introduced the “largest large number” ouf

χ=ρPρΛ=c3GΛ=3.44×1012110120,𝜒subscript𝜌𝑃superscriptsubscript𝜌Λsuperscript𝑐3𝐺Planck-constant-over-2-piΛ3.44superscript10121similar-tosuperscript10120\displaystyle\chi=\frac{\rho_{P}}{\rho_{\Lambda}^{*}}=\frac{c^{3}}{G\hbar% \Lambda}=3.44\times 10^{121}\sim 10^{120},italic_χ = divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_G roman_ℏ roman_Λ end_ARG = 3.44 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 121 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 120 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (241)

which is the ratio between the Planck density and the cosmological density. In terms of this number, we have

meMPχ1/61020,relPχ1/61020,ρeρPχ2/31080,tetPχ1/61020.formulae-sequencesimilar-tosubscript𝑚𝑒subscript𝑀𝑃superscript𝜒16similar-tosuperscript1020similar-tosubscript𝑟𝑒subscript𝑙𝑃superscript𝜒16similar-tosuperscript1020similar-tosubscript𝜌𝑒subscript𝜌𝑃superscript𝜒23similar-tosuperscript1080similar-tosubscript𝑡𝑒subscript𝑡𝑃superscript𝜒16similar-tosuperscript1020\frac{m_{e}}{M_{P}}\sim\chi^{-1/6}\sim 10^{-20},\quad\frac{r_{e}}{l_{P}}\sim% \chi^{1/6}\sim 10^{20},\quad\frac{\rho_{e}}{\rho_{P}}\sim\chi^{-2/3}\sim 10^{-% 80},\quad\frac{t_{e}}{t_{P}}\sim\chi^{1/6}\sim 10^{20}.divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∼ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 20 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , divide start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∼ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 20 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∼ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 80 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , divide start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∼ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 20 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (242)

Remark: If we assume that Eqs. (238) and (239) are exact (see footnote 21), then the “theoretical” values of the cosmological constant and of the “largest large number” are

Λth=G2me6α64=1.36×1052m2,χth=(cα2Gme2)3=2.81×10121.formulae-sequencesubscriptΛthsuperscript𝐺2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑒6superscript𝛼6superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi41.36superscript1052superscriptm2subscript𝜒thsuperscript𝑐Planck-constant-over-2-pisuperscript𝛼2𝐺superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑒232.81superscript10121\Lambda_{\rm th}=\frac{G^{2}m_{e}^{6}}{\alpha^{6}\hbar^{4}}=1.36\times 10^{-52% }\,{\rm m^{-2}},\qquad\chi_{\rm th}=\left(\frac{c\hbar\alpha^{2}}{Gm_{e}^{2}}% \right)^{3}=2.81\times 10^{121}.roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_th end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = 1.36 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 52 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_th end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG italic_c roman_ℏ italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_G italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 2.81 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 121 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (243)

Appendix D The neutrino

In ouf we have suggested that the mass of the neutrino is related to the cosmological constant by the relation

mΛ=(Λ3Gc)1/4=5.04×103eV/c2.superscriptsubscript𝑚ΛsuperscriptΛsuperscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi3𝐺𝑐145.04superscript103eVsuperscriptc2m_{\Lambda}^{*}=\left(\frac{\Lambda\hbar^{3}}{Gc}\right)^{1/4}=5.04\times 10^{% -3}\,{\rm eV/c^{2}}.italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG roman_Λ roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_G italic_c end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 5.04 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_eV / roman_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (244)

The Compton wavelength λC=/mcsubscript𝜆𝐶Planck-constant-over-2-pi𝑚𝑐\lambda_{C}=\hbar/mcitalic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_ℏ / italic_m italic_c of the neutrino is then given by

λΛ=(GΛc3)1/4=3.91×105m.superscriptsubscript𝜆Λsuperscript𝐺Planck-constant-over-2-piΛsuperscript𝑐3143.91superscript105m\lambda_{\Lambda}^{*}=\left(\frac{G\hbar}{\Lambda c^{3}}\right)^{1/4}=3.91% \times 10^{-5}\,{\rm m}.italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG italic_G roman_ℏ end_ARG start_ARG roman_Λ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 3.91 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m . (245)

To make the numerical applications we have used the empirical value Λ=1.11×1052m2Λ1.11superscript1052superscriptm2\Lambda=1.11\times 10^{-52}\,{\rm m^{-2}}roman_Λ = 1.11 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 52 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT of the cosmological constant. In terms of the “largest large number” defined by Eq. (241) we have

mΛMPχ1/41030,λΛlPχ1/41030.formulae-sequencesimilar-tosuperscriptsubscript𝑚Λsubscript𝑀𝑃superscript𝜒14similar-tosuperscript1030similar-tosuperscriptsubscript𝜆Λsubscript𝑙𝑃superscript𝜒14similar-tosuperscript1030\frac{m_{\Lambda}^{*}}{M_{P}}\sim\chi^{-1/4}\sim 10^{-30},\quad\frac{\lambda_{% \Lambda}^{*}}{l_{P}}\sim\chi^{1/4}\sim 10^{30}.divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∼ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 30 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , divide start_ARG italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∼ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 30 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (246)

Remark: Eliminating the cosmological constant between Eqs. (238) and (244) we obtain the following relation

me6(mΛ)4=α6MP2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑒6superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚Λ4superscript𝛼6superscriptsubscript𝑀𝑃2\frac{m_{e}^{6}}{(m_{\Lambda}^{*})^{4}}=\alpha^{6}M_{P}^{2}divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (247)

between the mass of the neutrino and the mass of the electron. This allows us to determine the “exact” value of the neutrino mass, independently of the uncertainty on the value of the cosmological constant. We find (mΛ)th=5.30×103eV/c2subscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚Λth5.30superscript103eVsuperscriptc2(m_{\Lambda}^{*})_{\rm th}=5.30\times 10^{-3}\,{\rm eV/c^{2}}( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_th end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5.30 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_eV / roman_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

Appendix E Transition between the inflation era and the radiation era

As discussed in Sec. VII the transition between the inflation era and the radiation era corresponds to a value of the scale factor a1subscript𝑎1a_{1}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT given by Eq. (100).272727Basically, this relation can be obtained as follows. The density of radiation evolves with the scale factor as ρrad=ρrad,0/a4subscript𝜌radsubscript𝜌rad0superscript𝑎4\rho_{\rm rad}=\rho_{\rm rad,0}/a^{4}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Owing to the fact that ρradρIsimilar-tosubscript𝜌radsubscript𝜌𝐼\rho_{\rm rad}\sim\rho_{I}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at the end of the inflation, we get a1(ρrad,0/ρI)1/4similar-tosubscript𝑎1superscriptsubscript𝜌rad0subscript𝜌𝐼14a_{1}\sim(\rho_{\rm rad,0}/\rho_{I})^{1/4}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. If we make the additional rough approximation ρrad,0ρΛsimilar-tosubscript𝜌rad0subscript𝜌Λ\rho_{\rm rad,0}\sim\rho_{\Lambda}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT on account of the cosmic coincidence we obtain a1(ρΛ/ρI)1/4similar-tosubscript𝑎1superscriptsubscript𝜌Λsubscript𝜌𝐼14a_{1}\sim(\rho_{\Lambda}/\rho_{I})^{1/4}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in order of magnitude. We want to determine the quantity

ϵ=a(t=0)a1,italic-ϵ𝑎𝑡0subscript𝑎1\epsilon=\frac{a(t=0)}{a_{1}},italic_ϵ = divide start_ARG italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG , (248)

where a(t=0)𝑎𝑡0a(t=0)italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) is the value of the scale factor at the “initial” time t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0.282828This time corresponds to the moment of the big bang singularity (ρ=𝜌\rho=\inftyitalic_ρ = ∞ and a=0𝑎0a=0italic_a = 0) in the case of a purely radiative early universe. We recall that the scale factor a𝑎aitalic_a is dimensionless and normalized such that a=1𝑎1a=1italic_a = 1 at the present epoch. In order to have dimensional lengthscales, we introduce the cosmological length RΛ=ctΛ=c/GρΛ=(8π/Λ)1/2=4.77×1026msubscript𝑅Λ𝑐subscript𝑡Λ𝑐𝐺subscript𝜌Λsuperscript8𝜋Λ124.77superscript1026mR_{\Lambda}=ct_{\Lambda}=c/\sqrt{G\rho_{\Lambda}}=(8\pi/\Lambda)^{1/2}=4.77% \times 10^{26}\,{\rm m}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_c italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_c / square-root start_ARG italic_G italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = ( 8 italic_π / roman_Λ ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 4.77 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 26 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m as a reference ouf . It is of the order of the present radius of the visible universe on account of the cosmic coincidence. We then define the “radius of the universe” by R(t)=a(t)RΛ𝑅𝑡𝑎𝑡subscript𝑅ΛR(t)=a(t)R_{\Lambda}italic_R ( italic_t ) = italic_a ( italic_t ) italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

(i) Model I: We first assume that the initial density of the universe (upper bound) is of the order of the Planck density: ρI=ρP=c5/G2=5.16×1099gm3subscript𝜌𝐼subscript𝜌𝑃superscript𝑐5superscript𝐺2Planck-constant-over-2-pi5.16superscript1099gsuperscriptm3\rho_{I}=\rho_{P}=c^{5}/G^{2}\hbar=5.16\times 10^{99}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ = 5.16 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 99 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. According to Eq. (100) we have

a1=(Ωrad,0ΩΛ,0)1/4(ρΛρP)1/4=1.98×1032χ1/41030,subscript𝑎1superscriptsubscriptΩrad0subscriptΩΛ014superscriptsubscript𝜌Λsubscript𝜌𝑃141.98superscript1032similar-tosuperscript𝜒14similar-tosuperscript1030a_{1}=\left(\frac{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}}{\Omega_{\Lambda,0}}\right)^{1/4}\left(% \frac{\rho_{\Lambda}}{\rho_{P}}\right)^{1/4}=1.98\times 10^{-32}\sim\chi^{-1/4% }\sim 10^{-30},italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1.98 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 32 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 30 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (249)

where χ𝜒\chiitalic_χ is the “largest large number” defined by Eq. (241). Therefore, the radius of the universe at the end of the inflation (i.e. at the transition between the inflation era and the radiation era) is

R1=a1RΛ=(Ωrad,0ΩΛ,0)1/4(8πGΛc3)1/4=9.42×106m.subscript𝑅1subscript𝑎1subscript𝑅ΛsuperscriptsubscriptΩrad0subscriptΩΛ014superscript8𝜋𝐺Planck-constant-over-2-piΛsuperscript𝑐3149.42superscript106mR_{1}=a_{1}R_{\Lambda}=\left(\frac{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}}{\Omega_{\Lambda,0}}% \right)^{1/4}\left(\frac{8\pi G\hbar}{\Lambda c^{3}}\right)^{1/4}=9.42\times 1% 0^{-6}\,{\rm m}.italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_G roman_ℏ end_ARG start_ARG roman_Λ italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 9.42 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m . (250)

Comparing Eq. (250) with Eq. (245) we see that the radius of the universe at the end of the inflation is of the order of the Compton wavelength of the neutrino:

R1λΛ.similar-tosubscript𝑅1superscriptsubscript𝜆ΛR_{1}\sim\lambda_{\Lambda}^{*}.italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (251)

On the other hand, it is natural to identify R(0)𝑅0R(0)italic_R ( 0 ) with the Planck length:

R(0)=lP=ctP=(Gc3)1/2=1.62×1035m.𝑅0subscript𝑙𝑃𝑐subscript𝑡𝑃superscript𝐺Planck-constant-over-2-pisuperscript𝑐3121.62superscript1035mR(0)=l_{P}=ct_{P}=\left(\frac{G\hbar}{c^{3}}\right)^{1/2}=1.62\times 10^{-35}% \,{\rm m}.italic_R ( 0 ) = italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_c italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG italic_G roman_ℏ end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1.62 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 35 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m . (252)

Therefore

a(t=0)=R(0)RΛ=lPRΛ=(GΛ8πc3)1/2=3.39×1062χ1/2,𝑎𝑡0𝑅0subscript𝑅Λsubscript𝑙𝑃subscript𝑅Λsuperscript𝐺Planck-constant-over-2-piΛ8𝜋superscript𝑐3123.39superscript1062similar-tosuperscript𝜒12a(t=0)=\frac{R(0)}{R_{\Lambda}}=\frac{l_{P}}{R_{\Lambda}}=\left(\frac{G\hbar% \Lambda}{8\pi c^{3}}\right)^{1/2}=3.39\times 10^{-62}\sim\chi^{-1/2},italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) = divide start_ARG italic_R ( 0 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = ( divide start_ARG italic_G roman_ℏ roman_Λ end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 3.39 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 62 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (253)

where we have used

lPRΛ=tPtΛ=(ρΛρP)1/2=(18πχ)1/2χ1/21060subscript𝑙𝑃subscript𝑅Λsubscript𝑡𝑃subscript𝑡Λsuperscriptsubscript𝜌Λsubscript𝜌𝑃12superscript18𝜋𝜒12similar-tosuperscript𝜒12similar-tosuperscript1060\frac{l_{P}}{R_{\Lambda}}=\frac{t_{P}}{t_{\Lambda}}=\left(\frac{\rho_{\Lambda}% }{\rho_{P}}\right)^{1/2}=\left(\frac{1}{8\pi\chi}\right)^{1/2}\sim\chi^{-1/2}% \sim 10^{-60}divide start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = ( divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_π italic_χ end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 60 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (254)

to get the last estimates. We then get

ϵ=R(0)R1=lPR1=lPa1RΛ.italic-ϵ𝑅0subscript𝑅1subscript𝑙𝑃subscript𝑅1subscript𝑙𝑃subscript𝑎1subscript𝑅Λ\epsilon=\frac{R(0)}{R_{1}}=\frac{l_{P}}{R_{1}}=\frac{l_{P}}{a_{1}R_{\Lambda}}.italic_ϵ = divide start_ARG italic_R ( 0 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG . (255)

Using Eq. (249), we can write Eq. (255) as

ϵ=(ΩΛ,0Ωrad,0)1/4(ρPρΛ)1/4lPRΛ.italic-ϵsuperscriptsubscriptΩΛ0subscriptΩrad014superscriptsubscript𝜌𝑃subscript𝜌Λ14subscript𝑙𝑃subscript𝑅Λ\epsilon=\left(\frac{\Omega_{\Lambda,0}}{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}}\right)^{1/4}\left% (\frac{\rho_{P}}{\rho_{\Lambda}}\right)^{1/4}\frac{l_{P}}{R_{\Lambda}}.italic_ϵ = ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG . (256)

Substituting Eqs. (241) and (254) into Eq. (256) we obtain

ϵ=(ΩΛ,0Ωrad,0)1/4(8πχ)1/4=1.71×1030χ1/41030.italic-ϵsuperscriptsubscriptΩΛ0subscriptΩrad014superscript8𝜋𝜒141.71superscript1030similar-tosuperscript𝜒14similar-tosuperscript1030\epsilon=\left(\frac{\Omega_{\Lambda,0}}{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}}\right)^{1/4}(8\pi% \chi)^{-1/4}=1.71\times 10^{-30}\sim\chi^{-1/4}\sim 10^{-30}.italic_ϵ = ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 8 italic_π italic_χ ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1.71 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 30 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 30 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (257)

The increase in size of the universe during the inflation is

R1lP=1ϵ=(Ωrad,0ΩΛ,0)1/4(8πχ)1/4=5.83×1029χ1/41030.subscript𝑅1subscript𝑙𝑃1italic-ϵsuperscriptsubscriptΩrad0subscriptΩΛ014superscript8𝜋𝜒145.83superscript1029similar-tosuperscript𝜒14similar-tosuperscript1030\frac{R_{1}}{l_{P}}=\frac{1}{\epsilon}=\left(\frac{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}}{\Omega_% {\Lambda,0}}\right)^{1/4}(8\pi\chi)^{1/4}=5.83\times 10^{29}\sim\chi^{1/4}\sim 1% 0^{30}.divide start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_ϵ end_ARG = ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 8 italic_π italic_χ ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 5.83 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 29 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 30 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (258)

Therefore, during the inflation, the size of the universe increases by about 30303030 orders of magnitude. We note that the value of ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ gives an e𝑒eitalic_e-folding number N0=68.5subscript𝑁068.5N_{0}=68.5italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 68.5 which is fully consistent with the observations (see Sec. VII.5). This value has been obtained by assuming R(0)=lP𝑅0subscript𝑙𝑃R(0)=l_{P}italic_R ( 0 ) = italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Conversely, assuming N6070similar-to-or-equals𝑁6070N\simeq 60-70italic_N ≃ 60 - 70 from the observations implies that R(0)lPsimilar-to𝑅0subscript𝑙𝑃R(0)\sim l_{P}italic_R ( 0 ) ∼ italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

(ii) Model II: We now assume that the initial density of the universe is of the order of the density of the electron: ρI=ρe=4.07×1016gm3subscript𝜌𝐼subscript𝜌𝑒4.07superscript1016gsuperscriptm3\rho_{I}=\rho_{e}=4.07\times 10^{16}\,{\rm g\,m^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4.07 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 16 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_g roman_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. According to Eq. (100) we have

a1=(Ωrad,0ΩΛ,0)1/4(ρΛρe)1/4=1.18×1011χ1/121010,subscript𝑎1superscriptsubscriptΩrad0subscriptΩΛ014superscriptsubscript𝜌Λsubscript𝜌𝑒141.18superscript1011similar-tosuperscript𝜒112similar-tosuperscript1010a_{1}=\left(\frac{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}}{\Omega_{\Lambda,0}}\right)^{1/4}\left(% \frac{\rho_{\Lambda}}{\rho_{e}}\right)^{1/4}=1.18\times 10^{-11}\sim\chi^{-1/1% 2}\sim 10^{-10},italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1.18 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 12 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 10 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (259)

where we have used Eqs. (241) and (242) to get the last estimates. Therefore, the radius of the universe at the end of the inflation (i.e. at the transition between the inflation era and the radiation era) is

R1=a1RΛ1α1/4(Ωrad,0ΩΛ,0)1/4(512π3Gc3Λ5)1/12=5.82×1015m,subscript𝑅1subscript𝑎1subscript𝑅Λsimilar-to-or-equals1superscript𝛼14superscriptsubscriptΩrad0subscriptΩΛ014superscript512superscript𝜋3𝐺Planck-constant-over-2-pisuperscript𝑐3superscriptΛ51125.82superscript1015mR_{1}=a_{1}R_{\Lambda}\simeq\frac{1}{\alpha^{1/4}}\left(\frac{\Omega_{\rm rad,% 0}}{\Omega_{\Lambda,0}}\right)^{1/4}\left(\frac{512\pi^{3}G\hbar}{c^{3}\Lambda% ^{5}}\right)^{1/12}=5.82\times 10^{15}\,{\rm m},italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG 512 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_G roman_ℏ end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 12 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 5.82 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m , (260)

where we have used Eq. (240). In Ref. ouf we have introduced the lengthscale

R~2=(Gc3Λ5)1/12=χ5/12lP=7.07×1015msubscript~𝑅2superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi𝐺superscript𝑐3superscriptΛ5112superscript𝜒512subscript𝑙𝑃7.07superscript1015m{\tilde{R}}_{2}=\left(\frac{\hbar G}{c^{3}\Lambda^{5}}\right)^{1/12}=\chi^{5/1% 2}\,l_{P}=7.07\times 10^{15}\,{\rm m}over~ start_ARG italic_R end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( divide start_ARG roman_ℏ italic_G end_ARG start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 12 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 / 12 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 7.07 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m (261)

that we have interpreted as being the radius of a dark energy star of the stellar mass. Therefore, we see that the radius of the universe at the end of the inflation is of the order of the radius of a dark energy star of the stellar mass:

R1R~2.similar-tosubscript𝑅1subscript~𝑅2R_{1}\sim{\tilde{R}}_{2}.italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ over~ start_ARG italic_R end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (262)

We note that this radius is gigantic as compared to the Compton wavelength of the neutrino obtained when we take ρI=ρPsubscript𝜌𝐼subscript𝜌𝑃\rho_{I}=\rho_{P}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [see Eqs. (245) and (251)]. They differ by 20202020 orders of magnitude (χ1/61020similar-tosuperscript𝜒16superscript1020\chi^{1/6}\sim 10^{20}italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 20 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT). On the other hand, we shall determine R(0)𝑅0R(0)italic_R ( 0 ) in order to get the same value of ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ as above (see Sec. VII.5). First, we note that

ϵ=R(0)R1=R(0)a1RΛ=(ΩΛ,0Ωrad,0)1/4(ρeρΛ)1/4R(0)RΛ,italic-ϵ𝑅0subscript𝑅1𝑅0subscript𝑎1subscript𝑅ΛsuperscriptsubscriptΩΛ0subscriptΩrad014superscriptsubscript𝜌𝑒subscript𝜌Λ14𝑅0subscript𝑅Λ\epsilon=\frac{R(0)}{R_{1}}=\frac{R(0)}{a_{1}R_{\Lambda}}=\left(\frac{\Omega_{% \Lambda,0}}{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}}\right)^{1/4}\left(\frac{\rho_{e}}{\rho_{% \Lambda}}\right)^{1/4}\frac{R(0)}{R_{\Lambda}},italic_ϵ = divide start_ARG italic_R ( 0 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_R ( 0 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_R ( 0 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG , (263)

where we have used Eq. (259). Equating Eqs. (263) and (256) we find that

R(0)=(ρPρe)1/4lP.𝑅0superscriptsubscript𝜌𝑃subscript𝜌𝑒14subscript𝑙𝑃R(0)=\left(\frac{\rho_{P}}{\rho_{e}}\right)^{1/4}l_{P}.italic_R ( 0 ) = ( divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (264)

Using Eq. (236), we get

R(0)=reα1/4=9.65×1015m.𝑅0subscript𝑟𝑒superscript𝛼149.65superscript1015mR(0)=\frac{r_{e}}{\alpha^{1/4}}=9.65\times 10^{-15}\,{\rm m}.italic_R ( 0 ) = divide start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = 9.65 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_m . (265)

In this model, the initial radius of the universe is of the order of the size of the electron instead of being of the order of the Planck length [see Eq. (252)]. This ensures that ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ is given by Eq. (257) in agreement with the observations (the size of the universe increases by about 30303030 orders of magnitude during the inflation). Conversely, assuming that the initial radius of the universe is of the order of the size of the electron, we find that ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ is given by Eq. (257). Finally, we find that

a(t=0)=R(0)RΛ=1α1/4reRΛ=2.10×1041χ1/31040,𝑎𝑡0𝑅0subscript𝑅Λ1superscript𝛼14subscript𝑟𝑒subscript𝑅Λ2.10superscript1041similar-tosuperscript𝜒13similar-tosuperscript1040a(t=0)=\frac{R(0)}{R_{\Lambda}}=\frac{1}{\alpha^{1/4}}\frac{r_{e}}{R_{\Lambda}% }=2.10\times 10^{-41}\sim\chi^{-1/3}\sim 10^{-40},italic_a ( italic_t = 0 ) = divide start_ARG italic_R ( 0 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 2.10 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 41 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 40 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (266)

where we have used Eqs. (242) and (254) to get the last estimates. The increase in size of the universe during the inflation is

R1R(0)=α1/4R1re=1ϵ=(Ωrad,0ΩΛ,0)1/4(8πχ)1/4=5.83×1029χ1/41030.subscript𝑅1𝑅0superscript𝛼14subscript𝑅1subscript𝑟𝑒1italic-ϵsuperscriptsubscriptΩrad0subscriptΩΛ014superscript8𝜋𝜒145.83superscript1029similar-tosuperscript𝜒14similar-tosuperscript1030\frac{R_{1}}{R(0)}=\frac{\alpha^{1/4}R_{1}}{r_{e}}=\frac{1}{\epsilon}=\left(% \frac{\Omega_{\rm rad,0}}{\Omega_{\Lambda,0}}\right)^{1/4}(8\pi\chi)^{1/4}=5.8% 3\times 10^{29}\sim\chi^{1/4}\sim 10^{30}.divide start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_R ( 0 ) end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_ϵ end_ARG = ( divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rad , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 8 italic_π italic_χ ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 5.83 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 29 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 30 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (267)

References

References

  • (1) P.H. Chavanis, AIP Conference Proceedings 1548, 75 (2013)
  • (2) P.H. Chavanis, Journal of Gravity 2013, 682451 (2013)
  • (3) P.H. Chavanis, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 129, 38 (2014)
  • (4) P.H. Chavanis, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 129, 222 (2014)
  • (5) P.H. Chavanis, arXiv:1208.1185
  • (6) P.H. Chavanis, Universe 1, 357 (2015)
  • (7) P.H. Chavanis, Phys. Rev. D 92, 103004 (2015)
  • (8) P.H. Chavanis, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130, 181 (2015)
  • (9) P.H. Chavanis, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1030, 012009 (2018)
  • (10) P.H. Chavanis, Universe 8, 92 (2022)
  • (11) S.I. Kruglov, Ann. Phys. 353, 299 (2015)
  • (12) S.I. Kruglov, Phys. Rev. D 92, 123523 (2015)
  • (13) S.I. Kruglov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35, 2050168 (2020)
  • (14) V.A. De Lorenci, R. Klippert, M. Novello, J.M. Salim, Phys. Rev. D 65, 063501 (2002)
  • (15) M. Novello, S.E. Perez Bergliaffa, J.M. Salim, Phys. Rev. D 69, 127301 (2004)
  • (16) C.S. Camara, M.R. de Garcia Maia, J.C. Carvalho, J.A.S. Lima, Phys. Rev. D 69, 123504 (2004)
  • (17) M. Novello, E. Goulart, J.M. Salim, S.E. Perez Bergliaffa, Class. Quantum Grav. 24, 3021 (2007)
  • (18) D.N. Vollick, Phys. Rev. D 78, 063524 (2008)
  • (19) M. Novello, J.M. Salim, A.N. Araújo, Phys. Rev. D 85, 023528 (2012)
  • (20) R. García-Salcedo, T. Gonzalez, I. Quiros, Phys. Rev. D 89, 084047 (2014)
  • (21) L. de la Peña, A.M. Cetto, A.V. Hernández, The Emerging Quantum. The Physics Behind Quantum Mechanics (Springer, 2015)
  • (22) A. Övgün, G. Leon, J. Magaña, K. Jusufi, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 462 (2018)
  • (23) H.B. Benaoum, A. Övgün, Class. Quantum Grav. 38 135019 (2021)
  • (24) H.B. Benaoum, G. Leon, A. Övgün, H. Quevedo, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 367 (2023)
  • (25) M. Born, Proc. Roy. Soc. 143, 410 (1933)
  • (26) M. Born, L. Infeld, Proc. Roy. Soc. 144, 425 (1934)
  • (27) G. Amelino-Camelia, Nature 398, 216 (1999)
  • (28) Ya. B. Zel’dovich, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. 6, 316 (1967)
  • (29) Ya. B. Zel’dovich, Sov. Phys. Uspek. 11, 381 (1968)
  • (30) P.H. Chavanis, Phys. Dark Univ. 44, 101420 (2024)
  • (31) F. Karolyhazy, Nuovo Cimento A 42, 390 (1966)
  • (32) A.S. Eddington, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 133, 605 (1931)
  • (33) G. Lemaître, L’expansion de l’espace, Revue des questions scientifiques 20, 391 (1931)
  • (34) L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz The Classical Theory of Fields, Pergamon Press (1951)
  • (35) S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology (John Wiley, 2002)
  • (36) Friedmann A. 1922, Z. Physik, 10, 377
  • (37) Friedmann A. 1924, Z. Physik, 21, 326
  • (38) G. Lemaître, Ann. Soc. Sci. Bruxelle 47, 49 (1927)
  • (39) G. Lemaître, Monthly Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 91, 483 (1931)
  • (40) R.R. Caldwell, Phys. Lett. B 545, 23 (2002)
  • (41) A.H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981)
  • (42) Planck Collaboration, Astron. Astrophys. 571, 66 (2014)
  • (43) Planck Collaboration, Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016)
  • (44) R. Tolman, P. Ehrenfest, Phys. Rev. 36, 1791 (1930)
  • (45) D. Lemoine, M. Lemoine, Phys. Rev. D 52, 1955 (1995)
  • (46) E.J. Kim, A.V. Olinto, R. Rosner, Astrophys. J. 468, 28 (1996)
  • (47) A.R. Liddle, H. Lyth, Cosmological Inflation and Large-Scale Structure (Cambridge University Press, 2000)
  • (48) J. Binney, S. Tremaine, Galactic Dynamics (Princeton Series in Astrophysics, 2008)
  • (49) A. Suárez, P.H. Chavanis, Phys. Rev. D 95, 063515 (2017)
  • (50) E.A. Milne, Zeit. für Astrophy. 6, 1 (1933)
  • (51) H. Poincaré, Comptes Rendus 140, 1504 (1905)
  • (52) H. Poincaré, Rend. Circ. Matem. Palermo 21 129 (1906)
  • (53) M. Abraham, Theorie der Elektrizitat (Teubner, Leipzig, 1905)
  • (54) H.A. Lorentz The Theory of Electrons (Teubner, Leipzig, 1909)
  • (55) P.H. Chavanis, Phys. Rev. D 107, 103503 (2023)
  • (56) J.J. Thomson, Phil. Mag. 11, 229 (1881)
  • (57) W. Heisenberg, E. Euler, Z. Physik 98, 714 (1936)
  • (58) G. Lemaître, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 20, 12 (1934)
  • (59) A.D. Sakharov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 177, 70 (1967)
  • (60) J. Martin, Comptes Rendus Physique 13, 566 (2012)
  • (61) H.B.G. Casimir, Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet. 51, 793 (1948)
  • (62) S. Weinberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 1 (1989)
  • (63) A. Dupays, B. Lamine, A. Blanchard, Astron. Astrophys. 554, A60 (2013)
  • (64) P.H. Chavanis, Phys. Dark Univ. 24, 100271 (2019)
  • (65) P.H. Chavanis, Phys. Dark Univ. 37, 101098 (2022)
  • (66) P.H. Chavanis, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130, 130 (2015)
  • (67) P.H. Chavanis, Phys. Lett. B 758, 59 (2016)
  • (68) P.H. Chavanis, S. Kumar, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 5, 018 (2017)
  • (69) P.H. Chavanis, Astronomy 1, 126 (2022)
  • (70) P.H. Chavanis, Phys. Rev. D 106, 063525 (2022)
  • (71) F. Donato et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 397, 1169 (2009)
  • (72) G. Gentile, B. Famaey, H. Zhao, P. Salucci, Nature 461, 627 (2009)
  • (73) R.B. Tully, J.R. Fisher, Astron. Astrophys. 54, 661 (1977)
  • (74) S.S. McGaugh, J.M. Schombert, G.D. Bothun, W.J.G. de Blok, Astrophys. J. 533, L99 (2000)
  • (75) S.S. McGaugh, Astron. J. 143, 40 (2012)
  • (76) M.G. Walker, S.S. McGaugh, M. Mateo, E.W. Olszewski, R. Kuzio de Naray, Astrophys. J. 717, L87 (2010)
  • (77) P.H. Frampton, K.J. Ludwick, R.J. Scherrer, Phys. Rev. D 84, 063003 (2011)
  • (78) M. Milgrom, Astrophys. J. 270, 365 (1983)
  • (79) E. Nelson, Phys. Rev. 150, 1079 (1966)
  • (80) W.J. Lehr, J.L. Park, J. Math. Phys. 18, 1235 (1977)
  • (81) P. Caldirola, Nuovo Cimento 45, 549 (1978)
  • (82) P.A.M. Dirac, Nature 139, 323 (1937)
  • (83) P.A.M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 165, 199 (1938)