1 Introduction
A fundamental problem in differential geometry is to investigate
the intricate relationship between the geometry and topology
of Riemannian manifolds. From the perspective of submanifold
theory, there is a profound interplay between the intrinsic and
extrinsic geometries of a submanifold, significantly influencing
its topological properties. In particular, the intrinsic geometry,
governed by metrics and curvature tensors intrinsic to the
submanifold itself, interacts with the extrinsic geometry,
characterized by how the submanifold is embedded within a
higher-dimensional ambient space. This interaction can lead
to profound insights into the topological structure of the
submanifold.
One of the key questions in this area involves understanding
how intrinsic curvature invariants, such as the Ricci curvature
and scalar curvature, relate to extrinsic ones,
including the mean curvature and normal curvature.
These relationships often manifest through inequalities that
bind intrinsic quantities to extrinsic ones, providing
constraints that influence the topological classification
of the submanifolds.
In the case of surfaces
isometrically immersed into the complete simply connected
space form of constant curvature , such
a pointwise relation is Wintgenβs inequality
|
|
|
This inequality, first proved by Wintgen [Wi] for surfaces in
, provides an extrinsic upper bound for the Gaussian curvature
of the surface in terms of the length
of the mean curvature vector field and the normal curvature
of , which is related to the area of the curvature ellipse.
Furthermore, Wintgen demonstrated that equality holds
precisely at the points where the ellipse of curvature is a circle.
Guadalupe and Rodriguez [GR] extended Wintgenβs inequality
in the aforementioned form and straightforwardly derived an
inequality for compact surfaces. This inequality establishes a
relationship between the integral of and
the Euler-PoincarΓ© characteristic of the surface.
Wintgenβs inequality has been generalized to any
isometric immersion with arbitrary
dimension into space forms, resulting in what is known as the
DDVV (cf. [DDVV, GT, Lu]) inequality
|
|
|
This pointwise inequality provides an upper bound
for the normalized scalar curvature of in
terms of the length of the mean curvature vector field,
and of the normal scalar curvature of given by
, where is the
normal curvature tensor of . Submanifolds for which
the DDVV inequality holds as equality at every point are
termed Wintgen ideal submanifolds. These submanifolds
often exhibit highly symmetric structures, and their
classification remains an area of active research,
especially in higher dimensions (see [XLMW] and references therein).
In the case , these precisely correspond to superconformal surfaces,
which are surfaces with curvature ellipses becoming circles
at every point. However, in dimensions , the
classification of Wintgen ideal submanifolds remains an
intriguing yet challenging problem.
In this paper, we are interested in a type of partial scalar
curvatures essentially introduced by Wolfson in [Wo].
More precisely, let be a Riemannian
manifold and denote by
the eigenvalues of the normalized Ricci tensor at each point.
The -th scalar curvature of is defined
pointwise as
|
|
|
At any point, the -th scalar curvature interpolates between the
minimum of the normalized Ricci curvature for ,
and the normalized scalar curvature .
In fact, is the minimum of the average of the sum of
Ricci curvatures in orthonormal vectors,
and it is a continuous function on for every .
Using the DDVV inequality and its equality case (cf. [GT, Lu]),
one can show that for every -dimensional submanifold , ,
the following inequality holds
|
|
|
at every point of , where the equality holds precisely at the umbilical points.
The aim of the present paper is to derive topological obstructions for compact
-dimensional submanifolds based on universal
lower bounds of the -norms of certain functions involving
and .
These obstructions are expressed in terms of the Betti numbers.
For compact submanifolds into space forms with ,
we prove the following theorem that can be regarded as a generalization of the
result of Guadalupe-Rodriguez [GR] in the context of higher-dimensional
submanifolds. Throughout this paper, we assume all considered manifolds
to be connected without boundary and oriented, with -th
Betti number over an arbitrary coefficient
field .
Theorem 1.
Given integers and , there exists for every
a positive constant ,
depending only on and , such that if is a compact
Riemannian manifold that admits an isometric immersion into
with ,
then
|
|
|
for any coefficient field . Moreover, if
|
|
|
for some , then is either homeomorphic to
, or it is an Eells-Kuiper manifold.
In particular, is homeomorphic to if
|
|
|
We recall that an Eells-Kuiper manifold [EK] of dimension is a
compactification of by a sphere of dimension , where
, or . For , it is simply connected and has the integral
cohomology structure of the complex (), quaternionic (), or the
Cayley () projective plane.
We point out that the assumption in the above theorem is
essential, and the result does not hold in the case .
In fact, the involved integral vanishes for every compact
superconformal surface, and there exist an abundance of such
surfaces with arbitrary genus in any codimension .
Chen and Wei [CW] obtained a geometric rigidity result
for compact submanifolds ,
with parallel mean curvature vector field, in terms of the lowest
eigenvalue of the Ricci tensor. More precisely, for , they
proved that such a submanifold is totally umbilical if
the -norm of the nonnegative part of the function
is sufficiently pinched,
where is a constant satisfying
.
The following immediate consequence of Theorem 1
is the analogous topological rigidity result for submanifolds of
dimension , without imposing any assumption on
the mean curvature.
Corollary 2.
Let , be an isometric
immersion of a compact Riemannian manifold. If
|
|
|
then is homeomorphic to .
The following result is a consequence
of Theorem 1 that applies to Einstein submanifolds.
Corollary 3.
Let , be an isometric
immersion of a compact Einstein manifold with Ricci
curvature . Then
|
|
|
for any coefficient field . Moreover, if
|
|
|
then is either homeomorphic to , or it is an
Eells-Kuiper manifold. In particular, is homeomorphic to if
|
|
|
The above result demonstrates that Theorem 1 is also valid for
in the case of any Einstein submanifold, as for any
in this scenario. However, Theorem 1 doesnβt hold
for in general, in which case the involved integral vanishes for
Wintgen ideal submanifolds. We note that apart from superconformal
surfaces and totally umbilical submanifolds,
there are only a few known compact Wintgen ideal submanifolds
(cf. [DDVV, XLMW]) and all of them have dimension .
In Section 5, we provide counterexamples to Theorem 1 for
. In fact, we present a method to generate new compact
Wintgen ideal submanifolds with positive first Betti number,
which is an interesting result in its own right.
These Wintgen ideal submanifolds
are unit bundles of plane subbundles of the normal bundle of
appropriate compact minimal surfaces in even-dimensional
spheres. This class of minimal surfaces encompasses
pseudoholomorphic curves in the nearly KΓ€hler sphere
. This justifies the inclusion of the additional term in
the following result when considering the case .
Theorem 4.
Given integers and , there exists for every
a positive constant ,
depending only on and ,
such that if is a compact
Riemannian manifold that admits an isometric immersion
into , then
|
|
|
for any coefficient field . Moreover, if
|
|
|
for some , then is either homeomorphic
to , or it is an Eells-Kuiper manifold. In particular, is homeomorphic to if
|
|
|
It is worth noting that the integral in Theorem 4 is conformally
invariant, rendering Theorem 4 applicable to submanifolds
in any space form. Moreover, the above theorem may be regarded
as an enhancement of a topological result by Shiohama and Xu
[SX2] for submanifolds in any space form, where the case
is considered.
The paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, we prove
an auxiliary lemma that is essential for the proofs of our
results and may have potential applications in other contexts.
In Section 3, we derive algebraic inequalities
regarding symmetric bilinear forms, which are crucial
to our proofs. Additionally, we provide examples that
suggest Theorem 1 may not
hold in general for . In Section 4, we give the
detailed proofs of Theorems 1 and 4.
The final Section 5 is devoted to the construction of the
aforementioned new compact 3-dimensional Wintgen ideal
submanifolds with arbitrarily large first Betti number, providing
counterexamples to Theorem 1 for .
2 An auxiliary lemma
The aim of this section is to prove an algebraic lemma essential
to our results. In the following, let and be
finite-dimensional real vector spaces with dimensions
and respectively. Both spaces are equipped with
positive definite inner products, which, for convenience, we
denote by the same symbol . We
denote the space of all symmetric bilinear forms from to
by , and the space of all
self-adjoint endomorphisms of by .
Given , we associate
to each the formal shape operator
, defined by
|
|
|
The space is a complete metric
space with respect to the norm defined by
|
|
|
where and are
orthonormal bases of and , respectively.
A function is called
homogeneous of degree if
for every and
any . The following lemma,
that may be useful for other purposes,
is crucial for the proofs of our results.
Lemma 5.
Let be integers and .
Suppose that there is a map that assigns to
each pair of vector spaces of dimensions respectively,
and equipped with positive definite inner products, a nonnegative continuous
function
that is homogeneous of degree and satisfies the following conditions:
-
(i)
For any isometries and we have
|
|
|
-
(ii)
If for some ,
then the endomorphism has an eigenvalue of multiplicity
at least for every unit vector , the vanishing of which
implies that .
Then there exists a positive constant
, depending only on and , such
that the following inequality holds for any vector spaces and all
|
|
|
where the function is given by
|
|
|
and stands for the volume
element
of the unit -sphere in .
To simplify the proof of the above lemma, we first prove the following result.
Sublemma 6.
Let be a sequence in
and a sequence
of positive real numbers. Assume that the sequence
converges to some
with . Then .
Proof:
For every , since and
,
there exists an open subset
such that and
for all .
Let be any convergent sequence such that
for all , and set .
We claim that
|
|
|
(1) |
Since , by our assumption
has an eigenvalue with multiplicity at least .
We argue that . Using
that
and since , we obtain
(see [A]).
Assuming that , since its multiplicity is at least ,
it follows that and this
is a contradiction. Therefore and this implies
that .
Assuming now that , from
it
follows that
for large enough, and this contradicts the fact that
. Therefore, and
the second condition for yields that
.
We may choose convergent sequences
in
such that the vectors span
for all . Using the Gram-Schmidt process
we obtain sequences with
for each .
Then ,
where are convergent sequences for each
. Consequently, we have that
|
|
|
(2) |
Using (1), we obtain
|
|
|
From (2) and the above it follows that
and thus, .Β Β Β β
Proof of Lemma 5.
Let be vector spaces as in the statement of the lemma.
We first show that the set in nonempty. Indeed,
since the function is homogeneous of degree ,
it follows that for an arbitrary with
, we have that .
Let be a sequence in such that
|
|
|
We claim that the sequence is bounded.
Arguing indirectly, assume that there exists a subsequence, which by abuse of
notation is again denoted by , such that
.
Since implies that for all ,
we can consider the sequence , where .
Then is bounded with and, by passing to a
subsequence if necessary, we may assume that it converges to some
with .
From it follows that
.
Then, the continuity of yields that
and Sublemma 6 implies that .
This contradicts the fact that , and the proof of the claim follows.
Thus we may assume that converges to some
.
We argue that . Suppose to the contrary
that . Then, Sublemma 6 applied
to yields that .
Therefore for every .
On the other hand, since , the mean value
theorem implies that there exists
such that
|
|
|
Since the sequence is bounded, we may assume that
it converges to some . Then, by letting in
the above, we conclude that
which contradicts the fact that for every .
Thus, the function attains a positive minimum
on ,
which by condition depends only on and .
Therefore, for an arbitrary
with , since
,
it follows that .
Then, the homogeneity of implies the desired inequality.
Β Β Β
3 Algebraic preliminaries
Let and be real vector spaces of dimensions
and respectively, equipped with positive definite inner products.
The Kulkarni-Nomizu product of two bilinear forms
is the -tensor
defined by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using the inner product of , we
extend the Kulkarni-Nomizu product to bilinear forms
, as the -tensor
defined by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For any , we define the formal Ricci tensor as the map
given by
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
For any , we denote by
the eigenvalues of the self-adjoint operator
determined by
|
|
|
For each , we consider the functions
defined by
|
|
|
For , we set .
Clearly we have
|
|
|
Furthermore, we define the function
by
|
|
|
where and are orthonormal bases
of and , respectively.
Here, the tensor
is given by
|
|
|
being the commutator of .
For every , we set
and we denote by
the traceless part of . The form is called umbilical
if . It is clear that is umbilical if and only if
for every .
Lemma 7.
For every and any ,
the following hold:
-
(i)
The formal Ricci tensor is given by
|
|
|
for , where is an orthonormal basis of .
-
(ii)
The DDVV inequality is valid
|
|
|
Equality holds if and only if there exist orthonormal bases
of and of such that
|
|
|
and for , where
are real numbers.
Proof:
Part (i) follows by a straightforward computation.
For the second part, we choose an orthonormal basis of such that if .
Let be the traceless part of for .
Using part (i) and taking into account that , a direct computation yields that
|
|
|
(3) |
On the other hand, it follows easily that
|
|
|
(4) |
Therefore, the desired inequality is equivalent to
|
|
|
The last inequality, along with its equality case, has been proved in
[GT, Lu]. The remainder of the proof follows the same steps as the proof of
Corollary 1.2 in [GT], with replaced by
and replaced by .Β Β Β β
Proposition 8.
The following assertions hold for any vector spaces , any
and every :
-
(i)
If , then for every , the
following inequality holds:
|
|
|
(5) |
Equality holds for some if and only if
is umbilical.
-
(ii)
For every , the following inequality holds:
|
|
|
(6) |
Equality holds for some if and only if is umbilical.
Proof:
(i) Assume that . For every we have that
|
|
|
(7) |
and equality holds if and only if
.
The proof of (5) then follows from the DDVV inequality
in Lemma 7.
Assume now that for some , inequality (5)
holds as equality. From (7) it follows that all inequalities in
|
|
|
hold as equalities. This implies that all eigenvalues of
are equal and thus, ,
where ,
.
Moreover, the DDVV inequality holds as equality for .
Let and be orthonormal bases
of and , respectively, as in Lemma 7.
Using Lemma 7
and taking into account that ,
a straightforward computation yields that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since , the above
yield that . Therefore, we obtain that
,
and this implies that is umbilical. The converse is obvious.
(ii) The desired inequality follows immediately from the
DDVV inequality. If (6) holds as equality, then
|
|
|
By virtue of Lemma 7, the left hand side of
the above is nonnegative. Thus and
the DDVV inequality holds as equality for .
Now we choose the orthonormal bases of and as in Lemma
7. Then a direct computation yields that
. Since ,
it follows that . Then, as in the proof of part , we conclude that
is umbilical.Β Β Β β
Proposition 9.
Given integers and , the following assertions hold:
-
(i)
If , then for any and there exists a constant
depending only on and ,
such that the following inequality holds
|
|
|
for any vector spaces and all , where is the
function defined in Lemma 5.
-
(ii)
For every and there exists a constant
depending only on and ,
such that the following inequality holds
|
|
|
for any vector spaces and all .
Proof:
For each pair of vector spaces of dimensions , respectively,
, and , we consider
the function
given by
.
We claim that the function for any ,
, as well the function for any
fulfill the requirements
in Lemma 5.
First, we argue that is continuous. Let
be a sequence in with
and we
consider orthonormal bases and
of and , respectively. From Lemma 7(i) it follows that the Ricci tensors satisfy
, .
Therefore for
the associated self-adjoint operators. Then the ordered eigenvalues of
these operators satisfy
,
(see for instance [A, Theorem 1]).
Therefore,
|
|
|
Using the fact that
for any , we obtain
.
It is clear that .
Hence the above imply that
and thus the function is continuous.
We next show that is a homogeneous function of
degree . Lemma 7 yields that
|
|
|
This implies that
and the corresponding eigenvalues are related by
.
Therefore,
and thus
|
|
|
From Lemma 7(i) it follows that
for every . Then a straightforward computation shows that
is a
homogeneous function of degree .
The fact that the function satisfies condition
in Lemma 5 follows directly from its definition.
Moreover, Proposition 8 implies that
condition is fulfilled for . The proof now follows from Lemma 5.
Β Β Β β
The following example shows that the inequality in part of Proposition
9 fails for . In fact, this example shows that
.
Example 10.
Given and a sequence such that
, we define the sequence
, given by
, where
|
|
|
with respect to orthonormal bases and
of and , respectively,
with and .
Then, for any unit vector the
eigenvalues of are
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thus if , whereas
if .
Therefore, for every ,
where and
consequently,
|
|
|
(8) |
On the other hand, a straightforward computation using (3) and
(4)
yields that
|
|
|
From (8) and the above it follows that the quotient
|
|
|
tends to zero. Therefore, the function
is not bounded from below by a positive constant. Since
for every
, we conclude that this also
holds for the function
.
4 Proofs of the Results
Let be an isometric immersion of a
compact Riemannian manifold into the Euclidean space
equipped with the usual inner product .
We denote by the normal bundle of and by
its second fundamental form.
First, letβs recall some well-known facts about total curvature
and how Morse theory imposes constraints on the Betti numbers.
The unit normal bundle of is defined as the set
|
|
|
The generalized Gauss map
is given by . For each , we
consider the height function defined by
. Since has a
degenerate critical point if and only if is a critical value of
, by Sardβs theorem, there exists a subset
of measure zero such that is a Morse function for all
. We denote by
the number of critical points of of index for each
and set
for every . Following Kuiper [Kuiper], we define the
total curvature of index of by
|
|
|
where denotes the volume element of the sphere .
From the weak Morse inequalities [Milnor63, Theorem 5.2, p. 29],
we have
|
|
|
(9) |
where is the -th Betti number of
over an arbitrary coefficient field . By integrating over ,
we obtain
|
|
|
(10) |
There is a natural volume element on the unit normal
bundle . In fact, if is a -form on such
that its restriction to a fiber of the unit normal bundle at
is the volume element of the unit -sphere of the normal
space of at , then , where
is the volume element of .
Shiohama and Xu [SX, p. 381] refined a well-known integral formula due to Chern-Lashof [CL1, CL2], and proved that
|
|
|
(11) |
where is the subset of the unit normal bundle of
defined by
|
|
|
and the shape operator of with respect to ,
where .
Lemma 11.
Let , be an
isometric immersion of a compact Riemannian manifold
such that .
Then, for any coefficient field ,
the Betti numbers satisfy . In particular:
-
(i)
If for any , then is homeomorphic to .
-
(ii)
If , then is an Eells-Kuiper manifold.
Proof:
The assumption is equivalent to
|
|
|
This implies that there exists a unit vector such that the
height function is a Morse function satisfying
, or equivalently
|
|
|
(12) |
The above and (9) yield that
for every coefficient field .
(i) Suppose that
|
|
|
(13) |
We claim that the homology groups of over the integers satisfy
for any , which in view of (13),
is equivalent to the claim that has no torsion. Indeed,
if contains torsion for some , then
for some prime , which contradicts (13).
Hence is a homology sphere over the integers.
We now prove that is simply connected. This is clear if .
Assume that and suppose, to the contrary,
that the fundamental group is .
It follows from [AD, Proposition 4.5.7, p. 90] that .
Thus, (12) yields that and
for any . Then, by Morse theory, it follows that the
manifold has the homotopy type of a CW-complex with no cells
of dimension . In particular, there are no -cells,
and thus, by the cellular approximation theorem, the inclusion
of the -skeleton
induces isomorphism between the fundamental groups. Therefore,
is a free group on elements. Hence,
, which is a contradiction.
Thus, is a simply connected homology sphere over the
integers and therefore a homotopy sphere. By the (generalized)
PoincarΓ© conjecture (Smale , Freedman ,
Perelman ), is
homeomorphic to .
(ii) Assume that
From PoincarΓ© duality it follows that is even and the Betti
numbers are
|
|
|
Jointly with (9) and (12), the above implies that
|
|
|
(14) |
Since , it follows from [CE75, Lemma 4.11, p. 85]
that . Hence from (9), we obtain
|
|
|
(15) |
The Euler-PoincarΓ© characteristic of
is given by
|
|
|
On the other hand, using (14) and (15), from [Milnor63, Theorem 5.2, p. 29] we have
|
|
|
and thus . Taking into account (14) and
(15), this implies that the height function is a Morse function with
three critical points. Therefore, is an Eells-Kuiper manifold.
Β Β Β β
Proof of Theorem 1.
Let , be an isometric immersion
with second fundamental form , mean curvature and
shape operator with respect to , where .
Assume first that the ambient space is the Euclidean space ,
that is . Since
,
and , it follows from
Proposition 9 that
|
|
|
for all . Integrating over and using (11), we have
|
|
|
Thus, from the above and (10) we obtain
|
|
|
(16) |
where .
Now, assume that
|
|
|
Then it follows directly from that ,
and the proof follows from Lemma 11.
In particular, if
|
|
|
then and (10) implies that only the first case in Lemma 11 can occur.
Suppose now that . We consider the isometric immersion
given by , where is an umbilical
inclusion of the sphere of radius into . Clearly
and the normal curvature of is given by
. Then the proof follows from the above argument applied to with
.
Β Β Β
Proof of Corollary 2.
It follows immediately from Theorem 1 for .Β Β Β
Proof of Corollary 3.
Since is Einstein and , it has constant normalized Ricci
curvature equal to . Therefore, for every
. The proof follows immediately from Theorem
1.Β Β Β β
Proof of Theorem 4.
Let , be an isometric
immersion. We claim that the integral
|
|
|
is invariant under conformal changes of the metric
of . Indeed,
from (3) and (4) it follows that
|
|
|
(17) |
where is the traceless part of the second fundamental form of and its normal curvature tensor.
Consider the conformal change
of the metric of , where is a smooth function,
and let
be the isometric immersion induced by . Then, at corresponding points the
normal spaces of coincide and particularly, the second fundamental
forms and the mean curvature vector fields
are related by
|
|
|
where is the normal component of the gradient of is
with respect to the metric .
The above imply that and thus,
the traceless parts of the shape operators of associated to
a local orthonormal frame field of satisfy
.
Any orthonormal tangent frame field of
and any orthonormal normal frame field
of give rise to orthonormal frame fields
of
with and of with .
Therefore, a direct computation using (3) and (4) yields that
|
|
|
Now, by virtue of (17), the claim follows from the above equality and the fact that the
volume element of is .
Therefore, under a conformal change of the metric of (a part of) ,
we may assume without loss of generality that the ambient space is the
Euclidean space . Since , and , it follows from
Proposition 9 that
|
|
|
for all . Then the proof follows arguing as in the proof of
Theorem 1 with
.
Β Β Β