Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Extraordinary Quality Factors in Dual-Band Polarization-Insensitive QuasiBound States in the Continuum

Maryam Ghahremani ghahremani.maryam@ut.ac.ir Photonics Research Laboratory, Center of Excellence on Applied Electromagnetic Systems, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran    Carlos J. Zapata-Rodríguez carlos.zapata@uv.es Department of Optics and Optometry and Vision Sciences, Faculty of Physics, University of Valencia, Dr. Moliner 50, Burjassot 46100, Spain
(June 19, 2024)
Abstract

In this study, we investigate a novel “dimerized” dielectric metasurface featuring dual-mode resonances governed by symmetry-protected bound states in the continuum (BICs). The metasurface design offers advantages such as insensitivity to incident light polarization and exceptionally high quality factors exceeding 105 for low and moderate structural deviations from the monoatomic array. By introducing mastered perturbations in the metasurface via the Brillouin zone folding method, without reducing symmetry, we explore the behavior of symmetry-protected BIC states and their polarization-independent responses. Through numerical simulations and analysis, we demonstrate the superiority of Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factors for specific BIC-based resonances, leading to precise control over interaction behaviors and light engineering in both near and far fields. Our findings contribute to the understanding of BIC resonance interactions and offer insights into the design of high-performance sensing applications and meta-devices with enhanced functionalities.

I

II Introduction

Metasurfaces consisting of two-dimensional arrays of meta-atoms with a thickness of less than the wavelength are the focus of current research activities for their exceptional ability to effectively manipulate and control light-matter interactions in an ultra-narrow spectral window [1, 2, 3, 4]. This characteristic stems from a resonant effect, which are mostly controlled by the geometry of the unit cells. Thus, metasurfaces are capable of generating a variety of unique electromagnetic responses. These include anapole mode [5, 6, 7], Fano resonance [8, 9, 10], and electromagnetically-induced transparency [11, 12, 13]. The unique capabilities of metasurfaces have led to planar optical meta-components with a wide range of applications across both microwave and optical frequencies in the fields of imaging and lensing [14, 15, 16, 17], holography [18, 19, 20], structural color printing [21, 22, 23], energy harvesting [24, 25, 26], and perfect absorbers [27, 28, 29], among others. Importantly, the recent development of all-dielectric metasurfaces especially benefit from highly efficient transmission applications [30, 31, 32]. Unlike their plasmonic counterparts, all-dielectric metasurfaces, in addition to their compatibility with standard complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) foundries, do not suffer from substantial material losses and can thus support Mie-type electric and magnetic resonances with extremely-high quality (Q𝑄Qitalic_Q) factors.

In recent years, a new design paradigm to achieve high-Q𝑄Qitalic_Q resonances has been recognized which is based on the physics of bound states in the continuum (BICs). The existence of such peculiar resonant states was initially demonstrated by Neumann and Wigner [33] in the context of quantum mechanics; however, many photonic structures, such as dielectric photonic crystals (PhCs), have been widely discussed for optical BICs in the last decade [34, 35, 36, 37, 38]. In PhC slabs, an optical BIC state (also referred as trapped modes) corresponds to an eigenmode that is ideally guided, i.e., completely decoupled from the outgoing waves, despite the fact that it occurs above the light line in the dispersion diagram ω=ω(k)𝜔𝜔𝑘\omega=\omega(\vec{k})italic_ω = italic_ω ( over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG ) with a resonance frequency ω𝜔\omegaitalic_ω and k𝑘\vec{k}over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG the in-plane wave-vector [39]. In principle, the eigenmodes existing above the light line should be leaky, i.e., it expects them to decay as they propagate owing to radiative leakage. The absence of radiation, the fact that the state is bound (perfectly localized), in lossless infinite structures provides infinite Q𝑄Qitalic_Q-factor resonances with zero linewidth which are not observable in the far-field spectra due to the lack of radiative channels. Therefore, the ideal BIC states cannot be manifested in real practical cases and are rather mathematical concepts. In real non-ideal structures, BIC modes can be converted into a resonant condition, the so-called quasi-bound states in the continuum (Q-BIC), due to technological imperfections, surface roughness, material dissipative losses, or finite size of the device.

The optical BIC modes are classified in several different categories, one of which is referred as the symmetry-protected BIC (SP-BIC) existed at the ΓΓ\Gammaroman_Γ-point of the first Brillouin zone (FBZ) in PhCs. The SP-BIC state emerges from the symmetry mismatch between the modal field profile and the external outgoing wave. In dielectric PhC slabs, an ideal SP-BIC state can be transformed into a leaky resonance through introducing a slight perturbation that breaks the metasurface unit-cell configuration symmetry. Using an appropriate structural symmetry reduction allows field distribution of the SP-BIC mode is perturbed and transformed to a Q-BIC mode that can couple to the symmetric profile of normally-incident plane waves propagating as the radiation channel. Through manipulating the introduced asymmetry in the unit cell, one can effectively control and engineer radiative losses from Q-BIC in periodic structures [40] to attain the desired high-Q𝑄Qitalic_Q states. This mechanism of transition from SP-BICs to Q-BICs can offer a novel route to achieve ultrahigh Q𝑄Qitalic_Q-factor resonances with greatly enhanced electromagnetic near-fields in the metasurface plane which makes it exceptionally important for the applications in refractive index sensors [41] and non-linear optics [42, 43].

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) Schematics of the metasurface. (b) Spectral transmittance under x𝑥xitalic_x-polarized normal incidence within the region of interest for diferent radii Risubscript𝑅𝑖R_{i}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of the inner hole.

Resonances governed by SP-BIC states commonly exhibit sensitivity to the polarization of the incident light because the in-plane or out-of-plane asymmetry required for their excitation always damages the C4v rotational symmetry or mirror symmetry of the structures. To meet the challenge of designing metasurfaces with polarization-independent responses have gained considerable attention in recent years due to the flexible practical applications. In this regard, it was proposed to utilize cluster-based modifications of metasurfaces where ordinary particles are grouped together to form a unit super-cell (cluster) [44]. To excite optical trapped modes, design of the cluster forming the two-dimensional lattice can be realized in patterns based on either the equidistantly-spaced particles with perturbations in geometry or refractive index, or using the single-size non-perturbed particles with specific displacements toward the super-cell center. To characterize fundamental properties of such metasurfaces, group-theoretical methods solely based upon the symmetries of their unit clusters are employed. The particles within the super-cell can be arranged in accordance with the symmetry groups C4v, C2v, C4, C2 and Cs studied in [45, 46]. Among them, the symmetry perturbation methods maintaining maximal symmetry group C4v is more encouraging. For most of the previously reported such super-cell-based metasurfaces, to achieve the high-Q𝑄Qitalic_Q-factor resonances close to 106 or more, which are quite promising particularly for refractive index sensing applications, requires setting a very small asymmetry parameter in the range of 0.005 or less. In this case, practical realizations of the designs are rather rare and sometimes impossible. As the perturbation parameter becomes large, the Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factors of Q-BICs decrease significantly. Therefore, a long-standing question that remains unresolved is: how to achieve ultrahigh-Q𝑄Qitalic_Q Q-BICs when the perturbation parameter varies within a large range?

In this paper, we propose a “dimerized” dielectric metasurface with dual-mode resonances governed by SP-BIC states which offer two main advantages. First, they are insensitive to the normally-incident light with any state of polarization mapped onto the Poincaré sphere. Second, they represent Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factors of more than 106 for the asymmetry parameter about α=0.05𝛼0.05\alpha=0.05italic_α = 0.05, which is at least 10 times larger than the previously reported designs. Such large values of the asymmetric differences avoids limitations of current fabrication process technology. From the study of the photonic band structure, we theoretically investigate the result of Brillouin zone folding and relocation of the BIC states when we introduce a perturbation into the metasurface structure through thoroughly perforating a concentric hole in half of the nanodisks. Upon this feature, the eigenmodes of the unperturbed lattice existed in the guided region zone are brought into the continuum to form Q-BIC states. We consider that the metasurface under study is composed of silicon (Si) nanodisk resonators ordered in a square lattice and supporting C4v high-symmetry features, subsequently providing extremely-high Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factors. Our proposed metasurface with simpler fabrication process and in a fully symmetric arrangement may facilitate design and realization of ultrahigh-performance sensing applications.

III Device design and numerical simulations

Figure 1(a) shows the schematics of the metasurface that is the object of our analysis. This metasurface is based on the controlled perturbation upon a square array of silicon disks with lattice constant Psuperscript𝑃P^{\prime}italic_P start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The dielectric disks have a radius Rdsubscript𝑅𝑑R_{d}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and a height H𝐻Hitalic_H, lying on a SiO2 substrate and being cladded by an optical adhesive, both occupying a semi-infinite space for simplicity. If not mentioned explicitly, we will consider Rd=165subscript𝑅𝑑165R_{d}=165italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 165 nm and H=160𝐻160H=160italic_H = 160 nm in our simulations. Moreover, the index of refraction of Si and SiO2 is here taken from Ref. [47], which are valid within the near-infrared window of our interest ranging from 1100110011001100 nm and 1300130013001300 nm. The optical adhesive layer is here considered of refractive index nad=1.33subscript𝑛ad1.33n_{\text{ad}}=1.33italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ad end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.33. Next a disturbance is introduced in our primary periodic structure by etching a concentric hole of radius Risubscript𝑅𝑖R_{i}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in intersperced Si disks, as depicted in Fig. 1(a). This procedure retains the C4v in-plane symmetry of the original metasurface, thus enabling an optically isotropic response [45, 48]. In addition, the topology of such a disturbance enables the generation of extremely-narrow resonances when illuminated by an x𝑥xitalic_x-polarized plane wave, as shown in Fig. 1(b) for Ri>0subscript𝑅𝑖0R_{i}>0italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0. Our purpose is focused on illustrating how the strategy here followed drives a strong control over the Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factors of specific Q-BIC-based resonances found in the transmission response. On this subject, in addition, it remains challenging to demonstrate high-Q𝑄Qitalic_Q Q-BICs in experiments because ultra-small structural perturbations are demanding to fabricate with state-of-the-art techniques, and because inevitable fabrication imperfections introduce scattering losses. [49, 50, 51].

In Fig. 1(b) we show the transmittance of the metasurface when injecting a x𝑥xitalic_x-polarized plane wave under normal incidence conditions within the spectral region comprised between 1100110011001100 nm and 1300130013001300 nm. The numerical simulations were performed using the commercial software COMSOL Multiphysics, which is a solver of the Maxwell’s equations based on the finite element method [52]. In virtue of the C4v symmetry of our structure, the results are replicated by y𝑦yitalic_y-polarized plane waves. The unperturbed metasurface characterized by Ri=0subscript𝑅𝑖0R_{i}=0italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 nm demonstrates a flat response revealing a near-unity transmittance in the spectrum of interest. However, a disturbance in the original periodic distribution of the arrays introduces the signature of a pair of Q-BICs, where transmittance drastically drops within a very narrow spectral band. This fact is a manifestation that symmetry-protected BICs cannot be observed through prescribed electromagnetic signals because of its nonradiative intrinsic features with vanishing resonance linewidths. In the case of Ri=40subscript𝑅𝑖40R_{i}=40italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 40 nm, both Q-BICs are revealed by corresponding minima in transmission, and therefore maxima in reflection, centered at 1181118111811181 nm and 1250125012501250 nm; from here on they will be coined as Q-BIC I and Q-BIC II, respectively. When increasing the radius of the centered hole by Ri=80subscript𝑅𝑖80R_{i}=80italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 80 nm, Q-BIC I is redshifted however minimizing the degradation of the sharp peak-and-trough (Fano) profile associated with this resonance. On the contrary, Q-BIC II keeps the central frequency of the sharp resonance however increasing the curve width notably. Moreover, when the inner radius Risubscript𝑅𝑖R_{i}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT increases up to 120 nm, Q-BIC I is still resilient upon a resonance degradation, in opossition to the case of Q-BIC II. This unique characteristic of Q-BIC I, which in addition is polarization independent, constitutes the main result of our study.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Dependence of the quality factor and central wavelength on the asymmetry parameter α𝛼\alphaitalic_α for: (a) Q-BIC I and (b) Q-BIC II.

The Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factor can be estimated through the transmission spectrum. More especifically, the Fano model well fits the spectral features of the transmittance as [10, 53, 54],

T(ω)=T0+A0[q+2(ωω0)/γ]21+[2(ωω0)/γ]2,𝑇𝜔subscript𝑇0subscript𝐴0superscriptdelimited-[]𝑞2𝜔subscript𝜔0𝛾21superscriptdelimited-[]2𝜔subscript𝜔0𝛾2T(\omega)=T_{0}+A_{0}\frac{[q+2(\omega-\omega_{0})/\gamma]^{2}}{1+[2(\omega-% \omega_{0})/\gamma]^{2}},italic_T ( italic_ω ) = italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG [ italic_q + 2 ( italic_ω - italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) / italic_γ ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 1 + [ 2 ( italic_ω - italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) / italic_γ ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (1)

where ω0subscript𝜔0\omega_{0}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the resonant frequency, γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ is the resonance linewidth, T0subscript𝑇0T_{0}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the transmission offset, A0subscript𝐴0A_{0}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the continuum-discrete coupling constant, and q𝑞qitalic_q is the Breit-Wigner-Fano parameter determining asymmetry of the resonance profile. By estimating the values ω0subscript𝜔0\omega_{0}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ through a curve fitting, the Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factor is determined using the expression [55]

Q=ω02γ.𝑄subscript𝜔02𝛾Q=\frac{\omega_{0}}{2\gamma}.italic_Q = divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_γ end_ARG . (2)

Especifically for Q-BIC I and Q-BIC II, their corresponding Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factors reach 1.7×1041.7superscript1041.7\times 10^{4}1.7 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and 3.0×1033.0superscript1033.0\times 10^{3}3.0 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for Ri=40subscript𝑅𝑖40R_{i}=40italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 40 nm, respectively, however droping to 3.4×1033.4superscript1033.4\times 10^{3}3.4 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and 3.4×1023.4superscript1023.4\times 10^{2}3.4 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT when Ri=80subscript𝑅𝑖80R_{i}=80italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 80 nm. In fact, the resulting peak positions and linewidths correspond exactly to the real and imaginary parts of the eigenmode frequencies [40], as we will corroborate down this lines.

A convenient procedure at this point lies on representing the Q𝑄Qitalic_Q-factor variation in terms of the so-called asymmetry parameter α𝛼\alphaitalic_α, which can be defined for our structure by

α=RiRd.𝛼subscript𝑅𝑖subscript𝑅𝑑\alpha=\frac{R_{i}}{R_{d}}.italic_α = divide start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG . (3)

Note that α=0𝛼0\alpha=0italic_α = 0 is the minimum value of the asymmetry parameter that corresponds to the undisturbed lattice, a case providing a Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factor ideally tending to infinity. Otherwise α1𝛼1\alpha\leq 1italic_α ≤ 1 is always satisfied. In particular, α6×102𝛼6superscript102\alpha\approx 6\times 10^{-2}italic_α ≈ 6 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT if Ri=10subscript𝑅𝑖10R_{i}=10italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 10 nm, which is a value highlighted in Fig. 2, the latter illustrating the variation of the Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factor in terms of α𝛼\alphaitalic_α for Q-BIC I and Q-BIC II. Note that an alternate definition α=ΔS/S𝛼Δ𝑆𝑆\alpha={\Delta S}/{S}italic_α = roman_Δ italic_S / italic_S can be found elsewhere [40, 56], where ΔS=πRi2Δ𝑆𝜋superscriptsubscript𝑅𝑖2\Delta S=\pi R_{i}^{2}roman_Δ italic_S = italic_π italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and S=πRd2𝑆𝜋superscriptsubscript𝑅𝑑2S=\pi R_{d}^{2}italic_S = italic_π italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are the areas of the centered hole and the nanodisk, respectively. This fact will be taken into account in our comparative (see Table 1). Our results endorse the well-known inverse square dependence of the Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factor upon the asymmetry parameter α𝛼\alphaitalic_α, namely [40]

Q=Q0α2,𝑄subscript𝑄0superscript𝛼2Q=\frac{Q_{0}}{\alpha^{2}},italic_Q = divide start_ARG italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (4)

where Q0subscript𝑄0Q_{0}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a constant determined by the metasurface design. Equation (4) is an accurate approach for low values of the asymmetry parameter, typically α<0.1𝛼0.1\alpha<0.1italic_α < 0.1. An extraordinary Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factor is then related to ultrahigh values of the constant Q0subscript𝑄0Q_{0}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which in certainly governed by the symmetry of the array up to a certain degree. Provided Ri=10subscript𝑅𝑖10R_{i}=10italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 10 nm, leading to a value of α=0.06𝛼0.06\alpha=0.06italic_α = 0.06, the Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factor of Q-BIC I reaches 1.92×1061.92superscript1061.92\times 10^{6}1.92 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and Q-BIC II reduces to Q=4.85×105𝑄4.85superscript105Q=4.85\times 10^{5}italic_Q = 4.85 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Moreover, the Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factor of Q-BIC I is always higher that Q-BIC II by at least one order of magnitude for values of α<0.9𝛼0.9\alpha<0.9italic_α < 0.9, demonstrating a high degree of resiliance upon the introduction of the specific disturbance in the photonic structure here analyzed. Although the Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factor for the Q-BIC II resonance is lower than that of Q-BIC I, it is still considerably high for a polarization independent design. This can be verified by comparing the Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factor of analogous BIC-based proposals, as shown in Table 1. The Q𝑄Qitalic_Q-factor decreases much more slowly for Q-BIC I and is maintained above 104superscript10410^{4}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT because, as will be shown below, its eigenfield profile is weakly perturbed by the hole shape.

Table 1: Comparison of Q𝑄Qitalic_Q-factor between previous works based on multiple metasurfaces (MS) and the present study.
Resonant Structure α𝛼\alphaitalic_α Q𝑄Qitalic_Q-Factor111Calculated λ𝜆\lambdaitalic_λ (nm) Ref.
Dual Q-BICs on a rhomboidal MS 0.01 103superscript10310^{3}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1055 [57]
Permittivity-asymmetric all-dielectric MS 0.01 5×1035superscript1035\times 10^{3}5 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1145 [58]
Permittivity-asymmetric membrane MS 0.01 104superscript10410^{4}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1550 [59]
Si nanodisk tetramer MS 0.02 3×1043superscript1043\times 10^{4}3 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1555 [60]
Amorphous-silicon (a-Si) cuboids tetramer 0.01 105superscript10510^{5}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1265 [53]
Dielectric cubic tetramer MS 0.02 105superscript10510^{5}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1210 [61]
Tetrameric silicon nanoboxes 0.02 3×1053superscript1053\times 10^{5}3 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1300 [41]
Our work 0.06 2×1052superscript1052\times 10^{5}2 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1180
Refer to caption
Figure 3: (a) Top: First Brillouin zone in the kxsubscript𝑘𝑥k_{x}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-kysubscript𝑘𝑦k_{y}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT plane of the undisturbed and dimerized square lattice, whose area contours are given by a purple dashed line and a solid green line, respectively. Bottom: Brillouin zones of the metasurfaces. (b) Band diagram of TE-like and TM-like polarized Bloch modes for the full-disk structure (Ri=0subscript𝑅𝑖0R_{i}=0italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 nm). (c)-(d) Electromagnetic fields for selected Bloch frequencies at Msuperscript𝑀M^{\prime}italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

IV Analysis and discussion

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (a) Band structure for polarized TE and TM Bloch modes for the dimerized array of meta-atoms for Ri=40subscript𝑅𝑖40R_{i}=40italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 40 nm. (b) and (c) Electromagnetic fields for selected Bloch frequencies.
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Multipolar decomposition for the (a-b) Q-BIC I and the (e-f) Q-BIC II for the dimerized nanostructure at Ri=40subscript𝑅𝑖40R_{i}=40italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 40 nm. Detailed analysis of toroidal dipole components (for Q-BIC I) and magnetic quadrupole components (for Q-BIC II) are given in (b) and (f), respectively. Resonant electromagnetic fields around the centered holey disk of Q-BIC I (c-d) and Q-BIC II (g-h) with a natural wavelength of 1179117911791179 nm and 1249124912491249 nm, respectively.
Refer to caption
Figure 6: (a) Metasurface response to different linear polarization states at Ri=40subscript𝑅𝑖40R_{i}=40italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 40 nm, showing in-plane magnetic and electric field distributions for TM-like and TE-like modes at an incident angle of φ=45𝜑superscript45\varphi=45^{\circ}italic_φ = 45 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT degrees. Transmission spectrum and field profiles of the metasurface under right-handed (RH) (b) and left-handed (LH) (c) circularly polarized (CP) light.

The disturbance executed upon the “monoatomic” dielectric metasurface reveals a process of dimerization in the periodic structure since the unit cell (or super-cell) now includes an unperturbed disk and a holey disk. As a result, the lattice is reconfigured with a larger period P>P𝑃superscript𝑃P>P^{\prime}italic_P > italic_P start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT but still conserving its square lattice symmetry, as depicted in Fig. 3(a). In our calculations, we set a holey disk at the center of the super-cell, and neighboring full disks evenly contribute by one quart each one as they are located at the super-cell corners. Inherently, such spatial distribution manifests the dimerization of the super-cell and, in addition, explicitly retains the original C4v symmetry of the photonic lattice. Note that an alternate super-cell taking the holey disks at the corners and a full Si particle set at the center will also provide the desired results. Figure 3(a) also shows the FBZ within the kxsubscript𝑘𝑥k_{x}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-kysubscript𝑘𝑦k_{y}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Fourier plane of the square array of undisturbed Si disks (α=0𝛼0\alpha=0italic_α = 0) with boundary Bloch frequencies located at points ΓΓ\Gammaroman_Γ, Xsuperscript𝑋X^{\prime}italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and Msuperscript𝑀M^{\prime}italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Held within such a spectral window, the FBZ of the dimerized metasurfaces is in addition represented by the characteristic points ΓΓ\Gammaroman_Γ, X𝑋Xitalic_X and M𝑀Mitalic_M. Note that the spatial frequency set at Msuperscript𝑀M^{\prime}italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is outside the FBZ of the dimerized arrangement and, through the procedure of the Brillouin zone folding, is here translated to the point ΓΓ\Gammaroman_Γ. This fact is also revealed by the inversion symmetry of the energy dispersion surfaces within the FBZ, however not illustrated in Fig. 3(b), leading to eigenvalues that are equivalent in the shaded areas by time-reversal symmetry. This mechanism ultimately enables to open a radiative channel for Bloch modes of the dimerized structure associated with the spatial frequency Msuperscript𝑀M^{\prime}italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, a property that cannot be found in the full-disk lattice, and which is the origin of the symmetry-protected Q-BICs [45, 46].

The band diagram for the disk lattice of period Psuperscript𝑃P^{\prime}italic_P start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is shown in Fig. 3(b). Numerical simulations are again performed by employing the COMSOL Multiphysics software following the procedure used in some of our previous studies [62, 63] and elsewhere [64, 65, 66, 67]. Bloch modes are classified according to their polarization characteristics. For instance, the TEx1superscriptsubscriptabsent1𝑥{}_{1}^{x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mode exhibits strong Hzsubscript𝐻𝑧H_{z}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Exsubscript𝐸𝑥E_{x}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT components but negligible Eysubscript𝐸𝑦E_{y}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Ezsubscript𝐸𝑧E_{z}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Hxsubscript𝐻𝑥H_{x}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and Hysubscript𝐻𝑦H_{y}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT components, and the TMy1superscriptsubscriptabsent1𝑦{}_{1}^{y}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mode has strong Ezsubscript𝐸𝑧E_{z}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Hysubscript𝐻𝑦H_{y}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT components and negligible Hxsubscript𝐻𝑥H_{x}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Hzsubscript𝐻𝑧H_{z}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Exsubscript𝐸𝑥E_{x}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and Eysubscript𝐸𝑦E_{y}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT components [48]. Since Ri=0subscript𝑅𝑖0R_{i}=0italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 nm, modes typified by the Bloch wavevector k𝑘\vec{k}over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG set at Msuperscript𝑀M^{\prime}italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in the Fourier plane thus exhibit an exponential decay at increasing values of the spatial coordinate |z|𝑧|z|| italic_z |, provided its modulus |k|𝑘|\vec{k}|| over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG | were higher than the wavenumber of the surrounding medium. In other words, these Bloch modes are perfectly localized below the light line. Somehow, they become trapped modes that are recently coined as BICs. In our design, we find two modes of this kind, which are coined as BIC I and BIC II in Fig. 3 (b); in fact they are set at wavelengths λ=1.19μ𝜆1.19𝜇\lambda=1.19\ \muitalic_λ = 1.19 italic_μm and λ=1.26μ𝜆1.26𝜇\lambda=1.26\ \muitalic_λ = 1.26 italic_μm, respectively. Note that BIC-I is in fact a degenerate TMx1superscriptsubscriptabsent1𝑥{}_{1}^{x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-TMy1superscriptsubscriptabsent1𝑦{}_{1}^{y}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mode, whereas BIC-II is a degenerate TEx1superscriptsubscriptabsent1𝑥{}_{1}^{x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-TEy1superscriptsubscriptabsent1𝑦{}_{1}^{y}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mode. From a fundamental point of view, this is a direct consequency that the symmetry group C4v is associated with our photonic structure [45, 46]. The spatial distribution of the electromagnetic fields for the above-mentioned Bloch modes at the x𝑥xitalic_x-y𝑦yitalic_y midplane of the cylindrical resonators are depicted in Fig. 3(c) and (d). The orthogonality of each degenerate modal doublet under investigation is apparent from their remarkably similar field distributions, which are rotated by 90 degrees relative to one another. The field flow (represented by arrows) indicates that the electric field magnitude is equal in neighboring atoms of the unit cell, but oriented in opposite directions. Consequently, the induced currents are fully compensated and cannot couple to the continuum. In fact, this is the reason these type of dark modes are also called as symmetry-protected BICs. Let us conclude that the latter argument can alternatively be supported by a vanishing coupling strength of the two BICs with a given normally-incident plane wave by verifying γe=0subscript𝛾𝑒0\gamma_{e}=0italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0, where the coupling coefficient [46, 68]

γeA(Einc×Hmode+Emode×Hinc)z^dxdy,proportional-tosubscript𝛾𝑒subscriptdouble-integral𝐴superscriptsubscript𝐸incsubscript𝐻modesubscript𝐸modesuperscriptsubscript𝐻inc^𝑧d𝑥d𝑦\gamma_{e}\propto\iint_{A}(\vec{E}_{\text{inc}}^{*}\times\vec{H}_{\text{mode}}% +\vec{E}_{\text{mode}}\times\vec{H}_{\text{inc}}^{*})\cdot\hat{z}\text{d}x% \text{d}y,italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∝ ∬ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_E end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT inc end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × over→ start_ARG italic_H end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT mode end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + over→ start_ARG italic_E end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT mode end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × over→ start_ARG italic_H end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT inc end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ⋅ over^ start_ARG italic_z end_ARG d italic_x d italic_y , (5)

where A𝐴Aitalic_A is the area of a unit cell. Note that subscripts “inc” and “mode” set in the electric and magnetic complex fields refer to the incident and trapped mode, respectively, and z^^𝑧\hat{z}over^ start_ARG italic_z end_ARG is the unit vector in the plane perpendicular to the metasurface.

Next we analyze the band diagram for the holey-disk nanostructure of lattice constant P𝑃Pitalic_P that is shown in Fig. 4(a). Considering a square array of Si disks with Ri=40subscript𝑅𝑖40R_{i}=40italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 40 nm, modes with spatial frequencies at Msuperscript𝑀M^{\prime}italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are then shifted at the ΓΓ\Gammaroman_Γ point within the FBZ, potentially opening a leakage channel through far field radiation. For TM-like and TE-like polarization, we now find a couple of quasi BICs, coined as Q-BIC I and Q-BIC II, respectively, which are found at λ=1.17μ𝜆1.17𝜇\lambda=1.17\ \muitalic_λ = 1.17 italic_μm and λ=1.25μ𝜆1.25𝜇\lambda=1.25\ \muitalic_λ = 1.25 italic_μm. Again, in virtue of the retained C4v symmetry of the photonic structure, both Q-BICs are degenerate modes. In these cases, however, the eigenfrequencies have a non-vanishing imaginary part leading to a finite Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factor. The spatial distribution of the electromagnetic fields for the above-mentioned Bloch modes are depicted in Fig. 4(b) and (c). It is straighforward to recognize that the field patterns are similar to those shown in Fig. 3(c) and (d). On the other hand, the coupling coefficient γesubscript𝛾𝑒\gamma_{e}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to our Q-BICs, as defined in Eq. (5), will no longer vanish.

In order to get further insights about the radiation signature of the Q-BICs, we provide an analysis that is derived from the far-field multipolar decomposition and near-field electromagnetic distribution of an isolated super-cell, which enables uncovering the main contributions of different multipoles on Q-BIC I and Q-BIC II resonances. The mathematical treatment here accepted for the evaluation of the scatterered power under the multipolar analysis is given as follows: we computed the scattering cross-section spectra of the Cartesian multipoles in free space by means of the analytical approach [69, 70, 71, 72]:

σscasubscript𝜎scaabsent\displaystyle\sigma_{\mathrm{sca}}\approxitalic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_sca end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≈ k046πϵ02|Einc|2|P+ik0cT|2+k04μ06πϵ0|Einc|2|M|2superscriptsubscript𝑘046𝜋superscriptsubscriptitalic-ϵ02superscriptsubscript𝐸inc2superscript𝑃𝑖subscript𝑘0𝑐𝑇2superscriptsubscript𝑘04subscript𝜇06𝜋subscriptitalic-ϵ0superscriptsubscript𝐸inc2superscript𝑀2\displaystyle\frac{k_{0}^{4}}{6\pi\epsilon_{0}^{2}|\vec{E}_{\mathrm{inc}}|^{2}% }\left|\vec{P}+\frac{ik_{0}}{c}\vec{T}\right|^{2}+\frac{k_{0}^{4}\mu_{0}}{6\pi% \epsilon_{0}|\vec{E}_{\mathrm{inc}}|^{2}}\left|\vec{M}\right|^{2}divide start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 6 italic_π italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | over→ start_ARG italic_E end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_inc end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG | over→ start_ARG italic_P end_ARG + divide start_ARG italic_i italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_c end_ARG over→ start_ARG italic_T end_ARG | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 6 italic_π italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | over→ start_ARG italic_E end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_inc end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG | over→ start_ARG italic_M end_ARG | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
+k06720πϵ02|Einc|2αβ|Qαβ(e)|2superscriptsubscript𝑘06720𝜋superscriptsubscriptitalic-ϵ02superscriptsubscript𝐸inc2subscript𝛼𝛽superscriptsubscriptsuperscript𝑄𝑒𝛼𝛽2\displaystyle+\frac{k_{0}^{6}}{720\pi\epsilon_{0}^{2}|\vec{E}_{\mathrm{inc}}|^% {2}}\sum_{\alpha\beta}\left|Q^{(e)}_{\alpha\beta}\right|^{2}+ divide start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 720 italic_π italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | over→ start_ARG italic_E end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_inc end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_e ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
+k06μ080πϵ0|Einc|2αβ|Qαβ(m)|2,superscriptsubscript𝑘06subscript𝜇080𝜋subscriptitalic-ϵ0superscriptsubscript𝐸inc2subscript𝛼𝛽superscriptsubscriptsuperscript𝑄𝑚𝛼𝛽2\displaystyle+\frac{k_{0}^{6}\mu_{0}}{80\pi\epsilon_{0}|\vec{E}_{\mathrm{inc}}% |^{2}}\sum_{\alpha\beta}\left|Q^{(m)}_{\alpha\beta}\right|^{2},+ divide start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 80 italic_π italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | over→ start_ARG italic_E end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_inc end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_m ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (6)

where ϵ0subscriptitalic-ϵ0\epsilon_{0}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, μ0subscript𝜇0\mu_{0}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and c𝑐citalic_c refers to electric permittivity, magnetic permeability and speed of light in free space, respectively, Eincsubscript𝐸inc\vec{E}_{\mathrm{inc}}over→ start_ARG italic_E end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_inc end_POSTSUBSCRIPT stands for the incident electric field and α,β=x,y,zformulae-sequence𝛼𝛽𝑥𝑦𝑧\alpha,\beta=x,y,zitalic_α , italic_β = italic_x , italic_y , italic_z. The terms

P𝑃\displaystyle\vec{P}over→ start_ARG italic_P end_ARG =iωΩjdv,absent𝑖𝜔subscriptΩ𝑗d𝑣\displaystyle=\frac{i}{\omega}\int_{\Omega}\vec{j}\text{d}v,= divide start_ARG italic_i end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ω end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_j end_ARG d italic_v , (7a)
M𝑀\displaystyle\vec{M}over→ start_ARG italic_M end_ARG =12Ωr×jdv,absent12subscriptΩ𝑟𝑗d𝑣\displaystyle=\frac{1}{2}\int_{\Omega}\vec{r}\times\vec{j}\text{d}v,= divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ω end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG × over→ start_ARG italic_j end_ARG d italic_v , (7b)
T𝑇\displaystyle\vec{T}over→ start_ARG italic_T end_ARG =110Ω[2r2j(rj)r]dv,absent110subscriptΩdelimited-[]2superscript𝑟2𝑗𝑟𝑗𝑟d𝑣\displaystyle=-\frac{1}{10}\int_{\Omega}\left[2r^{2}\vec{j}-(\vec{r}\cdot\vec{% j})\vec{r}\right]\text{d}v,= - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 10 end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ω end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 2 italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_j end_ARG - ( over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG ⋅ over→ start_ARG italic_j end_ARG ) over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG ] d italic_v , (7c)
Qαβ(e)superscriptsubscript𝑄𝛼𝛽𝑒\displaystyle Q_{\alpha\beta}^{(e)}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_e ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =3iωΩ[rαjβ+jαrβ23(rj)δαβ]dv,absent3𝑖𝜔subscriptΩdelimited-[]subscript𝑟𝛼subscript𝑗𝛽subscript𝑗𝛼subscript𝑟𝛽23𝑟𝑗subscript𝛿𝛼𝛽d𝑣\displaystyle=\frac{3i}{\omega}\int_{\Omega}\left[{r}_{\alpha}{j}_{\beta}+{j}_% {\alpha}{r}_{\beta}-\frac{2}{3}(\vec{r}\cdot\vec{j})\delta_{\alpha\beta}\right% ]\text{d}v,= divide start_ARG 3 italic_i end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ω end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ( over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG ⋅ over→ start_ARG italic_j end_ARG ) italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] d italic_v , (7d)
Qαβ(m)superscriptsubscript𝑄𝛼𝛽𝑚\displaystyle Q_{\alpha\beta}^{(m)}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_m ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =13Ω[(r×j)αrβ+rα(r×j)β,]dv,\displaystyle=\frac{1}{3}\int_{\Omega}\left[(\vec{r}\times\vec{j})_{\alpha}{r}% _{\beta}+{r}_{\alpha}(\vec{r}\times\vec{j})_{\beta},\right]\text{d}v,= divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ω end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ ( over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG × over→ start_ARG italic_j end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG × over→ start_ARG italic_j end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ] d italic_v , (7e)

are the moments of electric dipole (ED), magnetic dipole (MD), toroidal dipole (TD), electric quadrupole (EQ), and magnetic quadrupole (MQ), respectively, which are evaluated within the scatterer body ΩΩ\Omegaroman_Ω through the induced displacement-related current density, j(r)=iωϵ0[ϵ(r)1]E(r)𝑗𝑟𝑖𝜔subscriptitalic-ϵ0delimited-[]italic-ϵ𝑟1𝐸𝑟\vec{j}(\vec{r})=-i\omega\epsilon_{0}\left[\epsilon(\vec{r})-1\right]\vec{E}(% \vec{r})over→ start_ARG italic_j end_ARG ( over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG ) = - italic_i italic_ω italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_ϵ ( over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG ) - 1 ] over→ start_ARG italic_E end_ARG ( over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG ), which is proportional to the electric field. The complex-vector electric field within the super-cell is directlly taken from the same numerical simulations used for the evaluation of transmittance, which were previously discussed in Fig. 1.

We apply the multipolar analysis to the scattered power by a diatomic unit-cell with Ri=40subscript𝑅𝑖40R_{i}=40italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 40 nm provided the metasurface is illuminated by a y𝑦yitalic_y-polarized plane wave. At the peak reflectance of Q-BIC I, occurring at a wavelength of 1179117911791179 nm, the toroidal dipole components are dominant and, by a lesser significance, the magnetic dipole components, as shown in Fig. 5(a). To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the contributions made by the TD response, we perform calculations to decompose the TD components along different directions, shown in Fig. 5(b). This analysis reveals that that TDx is governing the far-field scattering of the dimerized “molecule” constituting the super-cell. The near-field distributions of the resonance at the central cross-sections of the y𝑦yitalic_y-z𝑧zitalic_z and x𝑥xitalic_x-y𝑦yitalic_y planes, as depicted in Fig. 5(c) and 5(d), respectively, provide confirmation of the observed behavior. In the y𝑦yitalic_y-z𝑧zitalic_z plane, the formation of a closed loop by the electric dipoles, predominantly dominated by the z𝑧zitalic_z components, signifies the generation of a transverse electric TD resonance oscillating along the x𝑥xitalic_x-direction [73, 74]. Furthermore, the circular configuration of the electric dipoles surrounding the center of the nanodisks, as shown in Fig. 5(d), demonstrates the excitation of a MD oscillating in the same direction as the electric TD. As expected, it is evident the high degree of similarity between the magnetic field distribution at resonance with the TMx1superscriptsubscriptabsent1𝑥{}_{1}^{x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT eigenmode of the metasurface given in Fig. 4(b). On the contrary, the behaviour of Q-BIC II is different. At the resonant wavelength 1249124912491249 nm, the dominant contribution to the scattered field comes from the magnetic quadrupolar term, as shown in Fig. 5(e). Furthermore, the term MQyz is dominant, as revealed in Fig. 5(f). Figure 5(g) displays the magnetic field distribution in the x𝑥xitalic_x-z𝑧zitalic_z plane, primarily influenced by the z𝑧zitalic_z-component, providing strong evidence for the excitation of a dominant magnetic quadrupole mode. The closed loops observed in the figure indicate displacement currents oriented perpendicular to the plane, characteristic of the quadrupolar nature of the magnetic field. Figure 5(h) complements this discussion by illustrating the distribution of these displacement currents in the x𝑥xitalic_x-y𝑦yitalic_y plane. Finally, the substantial correlation between the electric field distribution of the scattered near-field shown in Fig. 5(h) and that of the TEy1superscriptsubscriptabsent1𝑦{}_{1}^{y}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT eigenmode of the metasurface given in Fig. 4(c) is perceptible.

The analysis given above is based on a specific direction of polarization of the impinging plane wave. While not shown graphically, the differences found between bringing into action an incident optical signal with y𝑦yitalic_y polarization, as discussed above, and x𝑥xitalic_x polarization come down to a rotation of the electromagnetic fields by 90 degrees. This is a characteristic feature of metasurfaces with geometries that belong to the symmetry group C4v [45, 46], revealing the modal degeneracy of the Q-BICs excited in this sort of photonic structures. Obviously, the Cartesian components of the multipole expansion undergo a cyclic permutation under polarization rotation, but the overall contribution is maintained fixed. This fact further supports the polarization-independent behaviour of the metasurface. Figure 6(a) shows the transmission spectra by changing the polarization angle φ𝜑\varphiitalic_φ with respect to the x𝑥xitalic_x axis at Ri=40subscript𝑅𝑖40R_{i}=40italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 40 nm, evidencing an invariant response. We conclude by expanding our discussion about the polarization independence of Q-BIC I and Q-BIC II. Figure 6(a) also depicts the in-plane distributions of magnetic and electric fields for both TM-like and TE-like resonant modes at an incident angle φ=45𝜑superscript45\varphi=45^{\circ}italic_φ = 45 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. In Fig. 6(b) and (c), the transmission spectrum and field profiles of the metasurface are illustrated for right-handed (RH) and left-handed (LH) circularly polarized (CP) light, respectively. Notably, one can realize that the transmission spectrum exhibits identical profiles across all polarization states. Furthermore, the observed electric and magnetic near-fields align with those of the BIC eigenmodes, definitively characterizing the resonance.

V Concluding remarks

We discussed a novel “dimerized”, highly-symmetric, dielectric metasurface with dual-mode resonances governed by symmetry-protected BICs. Particularly, we analyze the effect of the Brillouin zone folding on the existence of BICs and reveal polarization-independent response of the quasi-BIC states in addition exhibiting extraordinary Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factors, which are supported by the resulting “diatomic” dielectric metasurfaces. This metasurface is insensitive to normally incident light with any polarization state and offers higher Q𝑄Qitalic_Q factors than other similar proposals. Our procedure involves perturbing the metasurface structure by introducing a concentric hole in half of the nanodisks, maintaining the C4v symmetry group of the structure and leading to the formation of Q-BIC states. The numerical simulations showcase the metasurface transmittance under different conditions. This study references related works on all-dielectric near-infrared photonics and extended Q-BICs with non-reduced symmetry in NIR dielectric metasurfaces. The efficient design provided by the method here described is competitive with that of most of the existing methods and are sufficient for most applications including nonlinear optics and structural colors, to name a few. We particularly suggest the potential for ultrahigh-performance sensing applications with simpler fabrication processes.

Disclosures. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability. Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

  • Sautter et al. [2015] J. Sautter, I. Staude, M. Decker, E. Rusak, D. N. Neshev, I. Brener, and Y. S. Kivshar, Active tuning of all-dielectric metasurfaces, ACS Nano 9, 4308 (2015).
  • Genevet et al. [2017] P. Genevet, F. Capasso, F. Aieta, M. Khorasaninejad, and R. Devlin, Recent advances in planar optics: from plasmonic to dielectric metasurfaces, Optica 4, 139 (2017).
  • Hsiao et al. [2017] H.-H. Hsiao, C. H. Chu, and D. P. Tsai, Fundamentals and applications of metasurfaces, Small Methods 1, 1600064 (2017).
  • Li et al. [2018] A. Li, S. Singh, and D. Sievenpiper, Metasurfaces and their applications, Nanophotonics 7, 989 (2018).
  • Algorri et al. [2018] J. F. Algorri, D. C. Zografopoulos, A. Ferraro, B. García-Cámara, R. Vergaz, R. Beccherelli, and J. M. Sánchez-Pena, Anapole modes in hollow nanocuboid dielectric metasurfaces for refractometric sensing, Nanomaterials 9, 30 (2018).
  • Baryshnikova et al. [2019] K. V. Baryshnikova, D. A. Smirnova, B. S. Luk’yanchuk, and Y. S. Kivshar, Optical anapoles: concepts and applications, Adv. Opt. Mater. 7, 1801350 (2019).
  • Ghahremani et al. [2021] M. Ghahremani, M. K. Habil, and C. J. Zapata-Rodriguez, Anapole-assisted giant electric field enhancement for surface-enhanced coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy, Sci. Rep. 11, 10639 (2021).
  • Cong et al. [2015] L. Cong, M. Manjappa, N. Xu, I. Al-Naib, W. Zhang, and R. Singh, Fano resonances in terahertz metasurfaces: a figure of merit optimization, Adv. Opt. Mater. 3, 1537 (2015).
  • Campione et al. [2016] S. Campione, S. Liu, L. I. Basilio, L. K. Warne, W. L. Langston, T. S. Luk, J. R. Wendt, J. L. Reno, G. A. Keeler, I. Brener, et al., Broken symmetry dielectric resonators for high quality factor Fano metasurfaces, ACS Photonics 3, 2362 (2016).
  • Limonov et al. [2017] M. F. Limonov, M. V. Rybin, A. N. Poddubny, and Y. S. Kivshar, Fano resonances in photonics, Nat. Photonics 11, 543 (2017).
  • Yang et al. [2014] Y. Yang, I. I. Kravchenko, D. P. Briggs, and J. Valentine, All-dielectric metasurface analogue of electromagnetically induced transparency, Nat. Commun. 5, 5753 (2014).
  • Yahiaoui et al. [2018] R. Yahiaoui, J. A. Burrow, S. M. Mekonen, A. Sarangan, J. Mathews, I. Agha, and T. A. Searles, Electromagnetically induced transparency control in terahertz metasurfaces based on bright-bright mode coupling, Phys. Rev. B 97, 155403 (2018).
  • Diao et al. [2019] J. Diao, B. Han, J. Yin, X. Li, T. Lang, and Z. Hong, Analogue of electromagnetically induced transparency in an S-shaped all-dielectric metasurface, IEEE Photonics J. 11, 1 (2019).
  • Hashemi et al. [2016] M. Hashemi, A. Moazami, M. Naserpour, and C. J. Zapata-Rodríguez, A broadband multifocal metalens in the terahertz frequency range, Opt. Commun. 370, 306 (2016).
  • Khorasaninejad and Capasso [2017] M. Khorasaninejad and F. Capasso, Metalenses: versatile multifunctional photonic components, Science 358, eaam8100 (2017).
  • Shanei et al. [2017] M. M. Shanei, M. Hashemi, D. Fathi, and C. J. Zapata-Rodríguez, Dielectric metalenses with engineered point spread function, Appl. Opt. 56, 8917 (2017).
  • Shrestha et al. [2018] S. Shrestha, A. C. Overvig, M. Lu, A. Stein, and N. Yu, Broadband achromatic dielectric metalenses, Light Sci. Appl. 7, 85 (2018).
  • Ni et al. [2013] X. Ni, S. Ishii, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, Ultra-thin, planar, Babinet-inverted plasmonic metalenses, Light Sci. Appl. 2, e72 (2013).
  • Zheng et al. [2015] G. Zheng, H. Mühlenbernd, M. Kenney, G. Li, T. Zentgraf, and S. Zhang, Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 308 (2015).
  • Wen et al. [2015] D. Wen, F. Yue, G. Li, G. Zheng, K. Chan, S. Chen, M. Chen, K. F. Li, P. W. H. Wong, K. W. Cheah, et al., Helicity multiplexed broadband metasurface holograms, Nat. Commun. 6, 8241 (2015).
  • Cheng et al. [2015] F. Cheng, J. Gao, T. S. Luk, and X. Yang, Structural color printing based on plasmonic metasurfaces of perfect light absorption, Sci. Rep. 5, 11045 (2015).
  • Sun et al. [2017] S. Sun, Z. Zhou, C. Zhang, Y. Gao, Z. Duan, S. Xiao, and Q. Song, All-dielectric full-color printing with TiO2 metasurfaces, ACS Nano 11, 4445 (2017).
  • Yang et al. [2020] W. Yang, S. Xiao, Q. Song, Y. Liu, Y. Wu, S. Wang, J. Yu, J. Han, and D.-P. Tsai, All-dielectric metasurface for high-performance structural color, Nat. Commun. 11, 1864 (2020).
  • Zhang et al. [2017] X. Zhang, H. Liu, and L. Li, Tri-band miniaturized wide-angle and polarization-insensitive metasurface for ambient energy harvesting, Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 (2017).
  • Ghaderi et al. [2018] B. Ghaderi, V. Nayyeri, M. Soleimani, and O. M. Ramahi, Pixelated metasurface for dual-band and multi-polarization electromagnetic energy harvesting, Sci. Rep. 8, 13227 (2018).
  • Li et al. [2020] L. Li, X. Zhang, C. Song, and Y. Huang, Progress, challenges, and perspective on metasurfaces for ambient radio frequency energy harvesting, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 (2020).
  • Akselrod et al. [2015] G. M. Akselrod, J. Huang, T. B. Hoang, P. T. Bowen, L. Su, D. R. Smith, and M. H. Mikkelsen, Large-area metasurface perfect absorbers from visible to near-infrared, Adv. Mater. 27, 8028 (2015).
  • Raad et al. [2020] S. H. Raad, Z. Atlasbaf, and C. J. Zapata-Rodríguez, Broadband absorption using all-graphene grating-coupled nanoparticles on a reflector, Sci. Rep. 10, 19060 (2020).
  • Karimi Habil et al. [2022] M. Karimi Habil, M. Ghahremani, and C. J. Zapata-Rodríguez, Multi-octave metasurface-based refractory superabsorber enhanced by a tapered unit-cell structure, Sci. Rep. 12, 17066 (2022).
  • Jahani and Jacob [2016] S. Jahani and Z. Jacob, All-dielectric metamaterials, Nat. nanotechnol. 11, 23 (2016).
  • Kamali et al. [2018] S. M. Kamali, E. Arbabi, A. Arbabi, and A. Faraon, A review of dielectric optical metasurfaces for wavefront control, Nanophotonics 7, 1041 (2018).
  • Koshelev and Kivshar [2021] K. Koshelev and Y. Kivshar, Dielectric resonant metaphotonics, ACS Photonics 8, 102 (2021).
  • von Neumann and Wigner [1993] J. von Neumann and E. P. Wigner, Über merkwürdige diskrete eigenwerte, The Collected Works of Eugene Paul Wigner: Part A: The Scientific Papers , 291 (1993).
  • Li et al. [2019] S. Li, C. Zhou, T. Liu, and S. Xiao, Symmetry-protected bound states in the continuum supported by all-dielectric metasurfaces, Phys. Rev. A 100, 063803 (2019).
  • Meng et al. [2022] B. Meng, J. Wang, C. Zhou, and L. Huang, Bound states in the continuum supported by silicon oligomer metasurfaces, Opt. Lett. 47, 1549 (2022).
  • Mohamed et al. [2022] S. Mohamed, J. Wang, H. Rekola, J. Heikkinen, B. Asamoah, L. Shi, and T. K. Hakala, Controlling topology and polarization state of lasing photonic bound states in continuum, Laser Photonics Rev. 16, 2100574 (2022).
  • Xiao et al. [2022a] X. Xiao, Y. Lu, J. Jiang, and Y. Chen, Manipulation of optical bound states in the continuum in a metal-dielectric hybrid nanostructure, Photonics Res. 10, 2526 (2022a).
  • Máñez-Espina et al. [2024] L. M. Máñez-Espina, I. Faniayeu, V. Asadchy, and A. Díaz-Rubio, Extreme nonreciprocity in metasurfaces based on bound states in the continuum, Adv. Opt. Mater. 12, 2301455 (2024).
  • Hsu et al. [2013] C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, S.-L. Chua, S. G. Johnson, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Bloch surface eigenstates within the radiation continuum, Light: Sci. Appl. 2, e84 (2013).
  • Koshelev et al. [2018] K. Koshelev, S. Lepeshov, M. Liu, A. Bogdanov, and Y. Kivshar, Asymmetric metasurfaces with high-Q resonances governed by bound states in the continuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 193903 (2018).
  • Gao et al. [2023] J.-Y. Gao, J. Liu, H.-M. Yang, H.-S. Liu, G. Zeng, and B. Huang, Anisotropic medium sensing controlled by bound states in the continuum in polarization-independent metasurfaces, Opt. Express 31, 44703 (2023).
  • Liu et al. [2019] Z. Liu, Y. Xu, Y. Lin, J. Xiang, T. Feng, Q. Cao, J. Li, S. Lan, and J. Liu, High-Q quasibound states in the continuum for nonlinear metasurfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 253901 (2019).
  • Koshelev et al. [2019] K. Koshelev, Y. Tang, K. Li, D.-Y. Choi, G. Li, and Y. Kivshar, Nonlinear metasurfaces governed by bound states in the continuum, ACS Photonics 6, 1639 (2019).
  • Chen et al. [2023] Y. Chen, G. Guo, S. Liu, S. Yin, W. Huang, and W. Zhang, Quasi-bound states in the continuum induced by supercell coupling, Opt. Express 31, 18807 (2023).
  • Yu et al. [2019] P. Yu, A. S. Kupriianov, V. Dmitriev, and V. R. Tuz, All-dielectric metasurfaces with trapped modes: Group-theoretical description, J. Appl. Phys. 125 (2019).
  • Overvig et al. [2020] A. C. Overvig, S. C. Malek, M. J. Carter, S. Shrestha, and N. Yu, Selection rules for quasibound states in the continuum, Phys. Rev. B 102, 035434 (2020).
  • Palik and Ghosh [1999] E. D. Palik and G. Ghosh, The Electronic Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids (Academic, New York, 1999).
  • Vaity et al. [2022] P. Vaity, H. Gupta, A. Kala, S. Dutta Gupta, Y. S. Kivshar, V. R. Tuz, and V. G. Achanta, Polarization-independent quasibound states in the continuum, Adv. Photonics Res. 3, 2100144 (2022).
  • Lee et al. [2021] S. Lee, J. Song, and S. Kim, Graphene perfect absorber with loss adaptive Q-factor control function enabled by quasi-bound states in the continuum, Sci. Rep. 11, 22819 (2021).
  • Gao et al. [2022] Y. Gao, L. Xu, and X. Shen, Q-factor mediated quasi-BIC resonances coupling in asymmetric dimer lattices, Opt. Express 30, 46680 (2022).
  • Zhang et al. [2023] J. Zhang, Y. Ruan, Z.-D. Hu, J. Wu, and J. Wang, An enhanced high Q-factor resonance of quasi-bound states in the continuum with all-dielectric metasurface based on multilayer film structures, IEEE Sens. J. 23, 2070 (2023).
  • [52] https://www.comsol.com/multiphysics/finite-element-method.
  • Cai et al. [2021] Y. Cai, Y. Huang, K. Zhu, and H. Wu, Symmetric metasurface with dual band polarization-independent high-Q resonances governed by symmetry-protected BIC, Opt. Lett. 46, 4049 (2021).
  • Fan et al. [2022] H. Fan, J. Li, C. Liu, Y. Sun, Y. Wang, X. Wang, T. Wu, H. Ye, and Y. Liu, Polarization-independent tetramer metasurface with multi-Fano resonances based on symmetry-protected bound states in the continuum, Opt. Commun. 525, 128864 (2022).
  • Wang et al. [2023] W. Wang, Y. K. Srivastava, T. C. Tan, Z. Wang, and R. Singh, Brillouin zone folding driven bound states in the continuum, Nat. Commun. 14, 2811 (2023).
  • Wang et al. [2020a] X. Wang, J. Duan, W. Chen, C. Zhou, T. Liu, and S. Xiao, Controlling light absorption of graphene at critical coupling through magnetic dipole quasi-bound states in the continuum resonance, Phys. Rev. B 102, 155432 (2020a).
  • Qin et al. [2024] M. Qin, G. Wei, H. Xu, R. Ma, H. Li, W. Gao, J. Liu, and F. Wu, Polarization-insensitive and polarization-controlled dual-band third-harmonic generation in silicon metasurfaces driven by quasi-bound states in the continuum, Appl. Phys. Lett. 124 (2024).
  • Yu et al. [2022] S. Yu, Y. Wang, Z. Gao, H. Li, S. Song, J. Yu, and T. Zhao, Dual-band polarization-insensitive toroidal dipole quasi-bound states in the continuum in a permittivity-asymmetric all-dielectric meta-surface, Opt. express 30, 4084 (2022).
  • Zhou et al. [2024] Q. Zhou, W. Yao, C. Jing, H. Wu, H. Huang, P. Jiang, H. Wen, and A. Zhou, Dual-band polarization-insensitive bound states in the continuum in a permittivity-asymmetric membrane metasurface, Opt. Laser Technol. 170, 110172 (2024).
  • Xiao et al. [2022b] S. Xiao, M. Qin, J. Duan, and T. Liu, Robust enhancement of high-harmonic generation from all-dielectric metasurfaces enabled by polarization-insensitive bound states in the continuum, Opt. express 30, 32590 (2022b).
  • Feng et al. [2023] J. Feng, X. Wang, J. Cheng, and M. Zeng, Polarization-independent bound state in the continuum without the help of rotational symmetry, Opt. Lett. 48, 4829 (2023).
  • Ghahremani and Shahabadi [2023] M. Ghahremani and M. Shahabadi, Accurate characterization of complex bloch modes in optical chain waveguides using real-valued computations, Sci. Rep. 13, 22115 (2023).
  • Ghahremani and Zapata-Rodriguez [2024] M. Ghahremani and C. J. Zapata-Rodriguez, Metamaterial-induced-transparency engineering through quasi-bound states in the continuum by using dielectric cross-shaped trimers, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.12200  (2024).
  • Han et al. [2019] S. Han, L. Cong, Y. K. Srivastava, B. Qiang, M. V. Rybin, A. Kumar, R. Jain, W. X. Lim, V. G. Achanta, S. S. Prabhu, et al., All-dielectric active terahertz photonics driven by bound states in the continuum, Adv. Mater. 31, 1901921 (2019).
  • Han et al. [2021] S. Han, P. Pitchappa, W. Wang, Y. K. Srivastava, M. V. Rybin, and R. Singh, Extended bound states in the continuum with symmetry-broken terahertz dielectric metasurfaces, Adv. Opt. Mater. 9, 2002001 (2021).
  • Chai et al. [2021] R. Chai, W. Liu, Z. Li, H. Cheng, J. Tian, and S. Chen, Multiband quasibound states in the continuum engineered by space-group-invariant metasurfaces, Phys. Rev. B 104, 075149 (2021).
  • You et al. [2023] S. You, M. Zhou, L. Xu, D. Chen, M. Fan, J. Huang, W. Ma, S. Luo, M. Rahmani, C. Zhou, et al., Quasi-bound states in the continuum with a stable resonance wavelength in dimer dielectric metasurfaces, Nanophotonics 12, 2051 (2023).
  • Algorri et al. [2022] J. Algorri, F. Dell’Olio, P. Roldán-Varona, L. Rodríguez-Cobo, J. López-Higuera, J. Sánchez-Pena, V. Dmitriev, and D. Zografopoulos, Analogue of electromagnetically induced transparency in square slotted silicon metasurfaces supporting bound states in the continuum, Opt. Express 30, 4615 (2022).
  • Tian et al. [2016] J. Tian, Q. Li, Y. Yang, and M. Qiu, Tailoring unidirectional angular radiation through multipolar interference in a single-element subwavelength all-dielectric stair-like nanoantenna, Nanoscale 8, 4047 (2016).
  • Terekhov et al. [2017] P. D. Terekhov, K. V. Baryshnikova, Y. A. Artemyev, A. Karabchevsky, A. S. Shalin, and A. B. Evlyukhin, Multipolar response of nonspherical silicon nanoparticles in the visible and near-infrared spectral ranges, Phys. Rev. B 96, 035443 (2017).
  • Zenin et al. [2017] V. A. Zenin, A. B. Evlyukhin, S. M. Novikov, Y. Yang, R. Malureanu, A. V. Lavrinenko, B. N. Chichkov, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, Direct amplitude-phase near-field observation of higher-order anapole states, Nano Lett. 17, 7152 (2017).
  • Babicheva and Evlyukhin [2021] V. E. Babicheva and A. B. Evlyukhin, Multipole lattice effects in high refractive index metasurfaces, J. Appl. Phys. 129 (2021).
  • Jeong et al. [2020] J. Jeong, M. D. Goldflam, S. Campione, J. L. Briscoe, P. P. Vabishchevich, J. Nogan, M. B. Sinclair, T. S. Luk, and I. Brener, High quality factor toroidal resonances in dielectric metasurfaces, ACS Photonics 7, 1699 (2020).
  • Wang et al. [2020b] X. Wang, S. Li, and C. Zhou, Polarization-independent toroidal dipole resonances driven by symmetry-protected bic in ultraviolet region, Opt. Express 28, 11983 (2020b).