Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Variational approach to nonlinear pulse evolution in stock derivative markets

Christopher Gaafele christopher.gaafele@studentmail.biust.ac.bw Department of Physics and Astronomy, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Private Mail Bag 16 Palapye, Botswana
(June 2024)
Abstract

The Ivancevic option pricing model is studied via variational approach. Both the Gaussiananstz𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑧Gaussiananstzitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n italic_a italic_n italic_s italic_t italic_z and the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h ansatz are used, and each has a unique results from one another. But in terms of existance of soliton solutions they both agree that hot market temperatures support the existance of soliton solutions.

I Introduction

Since the discovery of the Nonlinear Schrodinger equation (NLS) like option pricing model in 2010, it has drawn much interest theoretically in various soliton phenomena in the financial world. Variuos techniques such as the generalized Kudryashov method (GKM) demiray2022new , adomian decomposition method (ADM) and spectral boundry approximation (SBA) method adama2022exact , improved physics-informed neural network (IPINN) bai2022application , the method of Lie symmetries obaidullah2023analytical , the Elsaki-Adomian decomposition method gonz2015solving , projected differential transform method (PDTM) edeki2017analytical , He’s frecuency amplitude formulation gonzalez2017solving , qhomotopyanalysistransformmethod𝑞𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑝𝑦𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑑q-homotopyanalysistransformmethoditalic_q - italic_h italic_o italic_m italic_o italic_t italic_o italic_p italic_y italic_a italic_n italic_a italic_l italic_y italic_s italic_i italic_s italic_t italic_r italic_a italic_n italic_s italic_f italic_o italic_r italic_m italic_m italic_e italic_t italic_h italic_o italic_d (q𝑞qitalic_q-HATM) veeresha2022analysis and modulational instability (MI) analysis  chen2022soliton  gaafele2024modulational among others raheel2023research  wroblewski2023quantum .

Variational approach (VA) has also been a versatile method for nonlinear like models for different branches of physics including optics anderson1983variational  malomed1997pulse  malomed2002variational and in Bose-Einstein condesates sabari2013variational  wamba2008variational  wamba2014dynamical . In most studies this analysis has the same results as MI and other method that are used for the NLS like models, in terms of soliton dynamics and stability. Unlike MI VA is suitable in discribing soliton pulse propagation. VA can either use Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n ansatz nicolin2008nonlinear or sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h ansatz malomed2002variational among others since they are localize and assumes the shape of a soliton. Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n ansatz with its mathematical simplicity its advantageous because of its analytical solvability and also gives a unique propagation characteristics. They tend to spread more uniformly. sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h ansatz are unique in VA since they give a soliton solution that is stable and can propagate for longer distances and gives better approximation to the soliton solution. sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h pulses naturally account for strong nonlinear effects such as self-phase modulation, self-steepening, and the formation of dispersive waves, which are crucial in nonlinear optics and pulse shaping. Sech𝑆𝑒𝑐Sechitalic_S italic_e italic_c italic_h pulses are effective in managing dispersion, maintaining their shape over longer distances even in the presence of significant dispersion rusin2019variational malomed2002variational curilef2013tsallis rossi2015non lott2009numerical . In this paper both the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h and the Gaussian ansatz will be used in VA in the Ivancevic option pricing model (IOPM) due to the uniqueness of the results they produce.

The IOPM is the NLS like model used in asset derivative markets alternative approach to the traditional Black-Scholes (BS) model for pricing options. Developed by Vladimir Ivancevic, this model incorporates elements of both classical mechanics and financial mathematics ivancevic2010adaptive . It uses a Hamiltonian formalism to describe the dynamics of the underlying asset price and employs a different stochastic process than the standard geometric Brownian motion used in the Black-Scholes model. The model incorporates nonlinear dynamics, which can better capture the real-world behavior of financial markets, including features such as volatility clustering and heavy tails in the distribution of returns. Ivancevic’s approach sometimes draws analogies from quantum mechanics, using path integrals to represent the probabilities of different price paths kleinert2009path . This can provide a more flexible and accurate representation of price movements over time. The Black-Scholes equation is a linear partial differential equation, while the Ivancevic model often results in nonlinear equations due to its more complex stochastic processes. The IOPM can easily incorporate quantum neural computations ivancevic2009quantum .

The remaining section are as follows: Section II will focus on the Ivancevic option pricing model. Section III will focus on the variational calculation of the model using both the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h and the Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n ansatz. Section V shows direct simulation of the ansatz for different conditions. Section IV gives the discussion of the results and the paper is concluded by Section VI.

II The Ivancevic Option Pricing Model

The IOPM is a quantum probability equation given by

iψt+12σ22ψs2+β|ψ|2ψ=0,𝑖𝜓𝑡12superscript𝜎2superscript2𝜓superscript𝑠2𝛽superscript𝜓2𝜓0i\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t}+\frac{1}{2}\sigma^{2}\frac{\partial^{2}\psi}{% \partial s^{2}}+\beta|\psi|^{2}\psi=0,italic_i divide start_ARG ∂ italic_ψ end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_t end_ARG + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ψ end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + italic_β | italic_ψ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ψ = 0 , (1)

where ψ(s,t)𝜓𝑠𝑡\psi(s,t)italic_ψ ( italic_s , italic_t ) is the probability distribution function (PDF) for the option price at time t𝑡titalic_t for the stock/asset price s𝑠sitalic_s, σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ is the volatility, β𝛽\betaitalic_β is the Landau coefficient which is the adaptive market heat potential. Both σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ and β𝛽\betaitalic_β are assumed to be constants. The adaptive market heat potential can be related to the market temperature and it obeys the Boltzmann distribution. It depends on the set of adjustable parameters {wi}subscript𝑤𝑖\{w_{i}\}{ italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } which are refereed to as synaptic weight vector components ivancevic2010adaptive .

III A variational formulation of the IOPM

III.1 Gaussian Ansatz

It can be shown that from the IOPM Eq.(1) that the Lagrangian density is given by

=i2(ψψtψψt)+12σ2|ψs|212β|ψ|4.𝑖2𝜓superscript𝜓𝑡superscript𝜓𝜓𝑡12superscript𝜎2superscript𝜓𝑠212𝛽superscript𝜓4\mathcal{L}=\frac{i}{2}\left(\psi\frac{\partial\psi^{*}}{\partial t}-\psi^{*}% \frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t}\right)+\frac{1}{2}\sigma^{2}\left|\frac{% \partial\psi}{\partial s}\right|^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\beta|\psi|^{4}.caligraphic_L = divide start_ARG italic_i end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( italic_ψ divide start_ARG ∂ italic_ψ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_t end_ARG - italic_ψ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG ∂ italic_ψ end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_t end_ARG ) + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | divide start_ARG ∂ italic_ψ end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_s end_ARG | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_β | italic_ψ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (2)

We assume the Gaussian ansatz

ψ(s,t)=A(t)exp(s22w2(t)+ib(t)s2).𝜓𝑠𝑡𝐴𝑡superscript𝑠22superscript𝑤2𝑡𝑖𝑏𝑡superscript𝑠2\psi(s,t)=A(t)\exp\left(-\frac{s^{2}}{2w^{2}(t)}+ib(t)s^{2}\right).italic_ψ ( italic_s , italic_t ) = italic_A ( italic_t ) roman_exp ( - divide start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_t ) end_ARG + italic_i italic_b ( italic_t ) italic_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) . (3)

By substituting Eq.(3) into Eq.(2) and using L=𝑑s𝐿differential-d𝑠L=\int\mathcal{L}dsitalic_L = ∫ caligraphic_L italic_d italic_s we get the effective lagrangian Leffsubscript𝐿𝑒𝑓𝑓L_{eff}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT from the dispersion and interaction terms

Leff=14σ2A2wπ+2σ2b2A2w3πβ42A4wπ.subscript𝐿𝑒𝑓𝑓14superscript𝜎2superscript𝐴2𝑤𝜋2superscript𝜎2superscript𝑏2superscript𝐴2superscript𝑤3𝜋𝛽42superscript𝐴4𝑤𝜋L_{eff}=\frac{1}{4}\sigma^{2}A^{2}w\sqrt{\pi}+2\sigma^{2}b^{2}A^{2}w^{3}\sqrt{% \pi}-\frac{\beta}{4\sqrt{2}}A^{4}w\sqrt{\pi}.italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w square-root start_ARG italic_π end_ARG + 2 italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_π end_ARG - divide start_ARG italic_β end_ARG start_ARG 4 square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w square-root start_ARG italic_π end_ARG . (4)

which will be used to derive the equation of motions for the variational parameters.

III.2 Variational equations

The equations of motions are derived using the Euler-Lagrange equation of motion ddtLq˙iLqi𝑑𝑑𝑡𝐿subscript˙𝑞𝑖𝐿subscript𝑞𝑖\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot{q}_{i}}-\frac{\partial L}{\partial q% _{i}}divide start_ARG italic_d end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG divide start_ARG ∂ italic_L end_ARG start_ARG ∂ over˙ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG ∂ italic_L end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG.

For q=w𝑞𝑤q=witalic_q = italic_w we get

Leffw=σ2A2π4+6σ2b2A2w2πβ42A4π,subscript𝐿𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑤superscript𝜎2superscript𝐴2𝜋46superscript𝜎2superscript𝑏2superscript𝐴2superscript𝑤2𝜋𝛽42superscript𝐴4𝜋\frac{\partial L_{eff}}{\partial w}=\frac{\sigma^{2}A^{2}\sqrt{\pi}}{4}+6% \sigma^{2}b^{2}A^{2}w^{2}\sqrt{\pi}-\frac{\beta}{4\sqrt{2}}A^{4}\sqrt{\pi},divide start_ARG ∂ italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_w end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_π end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG + 6 italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_π end_ARG - divide start_ARG italic_β end_ARG start_ARG 4 square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_π end_ARG , (5)

using Newton’s second law of motion, 2wt2=veffwsuperscript2𝑤superscript𝑡2subscript𝑣𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑤\frac{\partial^{2}w}{\partial t^{2}}=-\frac{\partial v_{eff}}{\partial w}divide start_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = - divide start_ARG ∂ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_w end_ARGwe have

2wt2=σ2A22w+6σ2b2A2w2β22A4w,superscript2𝑤superscript𝑡2superscript𝜎2superscript𝐴22𝑤6superscript𝜎2superscript𝑏2superscript𝐴2superscript𝑤2𝛽22superscript𝐴4𝑤\frac{\partial^{2}w}{\partial t^{2}}=\frac{\sigma^{2}A^{2}}{2}w+6\sigma^{2}b^{% 2}A^{2}w^{2}-\frac{\beta}{2\sqrt{2}}A^{4}w,divide start_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_w + 6 italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_β end_ARG start_ARG 2 square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w , (6)

integrating we get

veff=σ2A24w22σ2b2A2w3+βA442w2,subscript𝑣𝑒𝑓𝑓superscript𝜎2superscript𝐴24superscript𝑤22superscript𝜎2superscript𝑏2superscript𝐴2superscript𝑤3𝛽superscript𝐴442superscript𝑤2v_{eff}=-\frac{\sigma^{2}A^{2}}{4}w^{2}-2\sigma^{2}b^{2}A^{2}w^{3}+\frac{\beta A% ^{4}}{4\sqrt{2}}w^{2},italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_β italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (7)

we can plug the efficient potential in the energy equation to get.

E=12(dwdt)2σ2A24w22σ2b2A2w3+βA442w2,𝐸12superscript𝑑𝑤𝑑𝑡2superscript𝜎2superscript𝐴24superscript𝑤22superscript𝜎2superscript𝑏2superscript𝐴2superscript𝑤3𝛽superscript𝐴442superscript𝑤2E=-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{dw}{dt}\right)^{2}-\frac{\sigma^{2}A^{2}}{4}w^{2}-2% \sigma^{2}b^{2}A^{2}w^{3}+\frac{\beta A^{4}}{4\sqrt{2}}w^{2},italic_E = - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_d italic_w end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_β italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (8)

which is anologous to that of a particle moving in a potential well.

For q=b𝑞𝑏q=bitalic_q = italic_b we get

dwdt=16σ2bw,𝑑𝑤𝑑𝑡16superscript𝜎2𝑏𝑤\frac{dw}{dt}=16\sigma^{2}bw,divide start_ARG italic_d italic_w end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG = 16 italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b italic_w , (9)

Which is substituted to the whole lagrangian L𝐿Litalic_L with kinetic terms π2w3A2bt𝜋2superscript𝑤3superscript𝐴2𝑏𝑡\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}w^{3}A^{2}\frac{\partial b}{\partial t}divide start_ARG square-root start_ARG italic_π end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG ∂ italic_b end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_t end_ARG. Which gives

b=32σ3A2w±128σ2+A4w4(1βA2σ22)σwA2,𝑏plus-or-minus32superscript𝜎3superscript𝐴2𝑤128superscript𝜎2superscript𝐴4𝑤41𝛽superscript𝐴2superscript𝜎22𝜎𝑤superscript𝐴2b=-\frac{32\sigma^{3}}{A^{2}w}\pm\frac{\sqrt{128\sigma^{2}+\frac{A^{4}w}{4}% \left(1-\frac{\beta A^{2}}{\sigma^{2}\sqrt{2}}\right)}}{\sigma wA^{2}},italic_b = - divide start_ARG 32 italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w end_ARG ± divide start_ARG square-root start_ARG 128 italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_β italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG ) end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_σ italic_w italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (10)

the frequency chirp equation, which can be determined once the width is known. For positive width, the frequency chirp can be complex given that β>σ242A6w(128σ2+A4w4)>0𝛽superscript𝜎242superscript𝐴6𝑤128superscript𝜎2superscript𝐴4𝑤40\beta>\frac{\sigma^{2}4\sqrt{2}}{A^{6}w}\left(128\sigma^{2}+\frac{A^{4}w}{4}% \right)>0italic_β > divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w end_ARG ( 128 italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG ) > 0. That is for this shape to be stable b𝑏bitalic_b has to be complex and it is complex for hot market temperatures. Otherwise it disintegrates into plane waves. Which has the same results as that from MIdauxois2006physics and other methods of solving the NLS equation. Note that for 0<β<σ22A20𝛽superscript𝜎22superscript𝐴20<\beta<\frac{\sigma^{2}\sqrt{2}}{A^{2}}0 < italic_β < divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG the soliton solution is unstable even though the market is at hot temperatures.

III.3 Sech Ansatz

In this section we assume the sech ansatz.

ψ(s,t)=A(t)sech(sw(t))exp(ib(t)s2),𝜓𝑠𝑡𝐴𝑡𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑠𝑤𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑖𝑏𝑡superscript𝑠2\psi(s,t)=A(t)sech\left(\frac{s}{w(t)}\right)exp\left(ib(t)s^{2}\right),italic_ψ ( italic_s , italic_t ) = italic_A ( italic_t ) italic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h ( divide start_ARG italic_s end_ARG start_ARG italic_w ( italic_t ) end_ARG ) italic_e italic_x italic_p ( italic_i italic_b ( italic_t ) italic_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , (11)

By substituting Eq.(11) into Eq.(2) we get

Leff=σ2A26w+23σ2b2A2w3βA43w,subscript𝐿𝑒𝑓𝑓superscript𝜎2superscript𝐴26𝑤23superscript𝜎2superscript𝑏2superscript𝐴2superscript𝑤3𝛽superscript𝐴43𝑤L_{eff}=\frac{\sigma^{2}A^{2}}{6w}+\frac{2}{3}\sigma^{2}b^{2}A^{2}w^{3}-\frac{% \beta A^{4}}{3w},italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 6 italic_w end_ARG + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_β italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 3 italic_w end_ARG , (12)

by using the same approach as in sectionIII.1.

III.4 Variational equations

The equations of motions are derived using the Euler-Lagrange equation of motion ddtLq˙iLqi𝑑𝑑𝑡𝐿subscript˙𝑞𝑖𝐿subscript𝑞𝑖\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot{q}_{i}}-\frac{\partial L}{\partial q% _{i}}divide start_ARG italic_d end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG divide start_ARG ∂ italic_L end_ARG start_ARG ∂ over˙ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG ∂ italic_L end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG.

For q=w𝑞𝑤q=witalic_q = italic_w we get

Lw=σ2A26w2+83σ2b2A2w2+β3wA4,𝐿𝑤superscript𝜎2superscript𝐴26superscript𝑤283superscript𝜎2superscript𝑏2superscript𝐴2superscript𝑤2𝛽3𝑤superscript𝐴4\frac{\partial L}{\partial w}=-\frac{\sigma^{2}A^{2}}{6w^{2}}+\frac{8}{3}% \sigma^{2}b^{2}A^{2}w^{2}+\frac{\beta}{3w}A^{4},divide start_ARG ∂ italic_L end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_w end_ARG = - divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 6 italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG 8 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_β end_ARG start_ARG 3 italic_w end_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (13)

Using Newton’s second law of motion 2wt2=veffwsuperscript2𝑤superscript𝑡2subscript𝑣𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑤\frac{\partial^{2}w}{\partial t^{2}}=-\frac{\partial v_{eff}}{\partial w}divide start_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = - divide start_ARG ∂ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_w end_ARG we get

d2wdt2=σ2A26w283σ2b2A2w2β3w2A4,superscript𝑑2𝑤𝑑superscript𝑡2superscript𝜎2superscript𝐴26superscript𝑤283superscript𝜎2superscript𝑏2superscript𝐴2superscript𝑤2𝛽3superscript𝑤2superscript𝐴4\frac{d^{2}w}{dt^{2}}=\frac{\sigma^{2}A^{2}}{6w^{2}}-\frac{8}{3}\sigma^{2}b^{2% }A^{2}w^{2}-\frac{\beta}{3w^{2}}A^{4},divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 6 italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG 8 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_β end_ARG start_ARG 3 italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (14)

intergrating we get

veff=σ2A26w+23σ2b2A2w3+β3wA4,subscript𝑣𝑒𝑓𝑓superscript𝜎2superscript𝐴26𝑤23superscript𝜎2superscript𝑏2superscript𝐴2superscript𝑤3𝛽3𝑤superscript𝐴4v_{eff}=\frac{\sigma^{2}A^{2}}{6w}+\frac{2}{3}\sigma^{2}b^{2}A^{2}w^{3}+\frac{% \beta}{3w}A^{4},italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 6 italic_w end_ARG + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_β end_ARG start_ARG 3 italic_w end_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (15)

the energy of the system

E=+12(dwdt)2+σ2A26w+23σ2b2A2w3+β3wA4,𝐸12superscript𝑑𝑤𝑑𝑡2superscript𝜎2superscript𝐴26𝑤23superscript𝜎2superscript𝑏2superscript𝐴2superscript𝑤3𝛽3𝑤superscript𝐴4E=+\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{dw}{dt}\right)^{2}+\frac{\sigma^{2}A^{2}}{6w}+\frac{% 2}{3}\sigma^{2}b^{2}A^{2}w^{3}+\frac{\beta}{3w}A^{4},italic_E = + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_d italic_w end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 6 italic_w end_ARG + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_β end_ARG start_ARG 3 italic_w end_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (16)

Which is similar to the equation describing a particle moving in a potential well.

For q=b𝑞𝑏q=bitalic_q = italic_b we get

dwdt=8πσ2bw3,𝑑𝑤𝑑𝑡8𝜋superscript𝜎2𝑏superscript𝑤3\frac{dw}{dt}=\frac{8}{\pi}\sigma^{2}bw^{3},divide start_ARG italic_d italic_w end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG = divide start_ARG 8 end_ARG start_ARG italic_π end_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (17)

Which is substituted to the whole lagrangian L𝐿Litalic_L with kinetic term π6wA2bt𝜋6𝑤superscript𝐴2𝑏𝑡\frac{\pi}{6}wA^{2}\frac{\partial b}{\partial t}divide start_ARG italic_π end_ARG start_ARG 6 end_ARG italic_w italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG ∂ italic_b end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_t end_ARG. Which gives

b=±1+2A2β6w4(32πσ2w3+23),𝑏plus-or-minus12superscript𝐴2𝛽6superscript𝑤432𝜋superscript𝜎2superscript𝑤323b=\pm\sqrt{-\frac{1+2A^{2}\beta}{6w^{4}\left(\frac{32}{\pi}\sigma^{2}w^{3}+% \frac{2}{3}\right)}},italic_b = ± square-root start_ARG - divide start_ARG 1 + 2 italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_β end_ARG start_ARG 6 italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG 32 end_ARG start_ARG italic_π end_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ) end_ARG end_ARG , (18)

the frequency chirp equation, which can be determined once the width is known. For positive width, the frequency chirp can be complex given that β>12A2𝛽12superscript𝐴2\beta>\frac{1}{2A^{2}}italic_β > divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG. Which is similar to the results above. In order for the shape given by the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h function to be stable b𝑏bitalic_b has to be complex, and it is complex for hot market temperatures. Which has the same results as that from MIdauxois2006physics and other methods of solving the NLS equation. It is important to note that for 12A2>β>012superscript𝐴2𝛽0\frac{1}{2A^{2}}>\beta>0divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG > italic_β > 0 the soliton solution of this type is unstable even though the market is at a hot temperature.

IV Discussion

In this section, the Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n and sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h ansatz are compared and discussed. Figure(1) shows the plots of the imaginary part of the frequency chirp Im(b)s,g𝐼𝑚subscript𝑏𝑠𝑔Im(b)_{s,g}italic_I italic_m ( italic_b ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. One can observe that, the plots are nonzero for β>0𝛽0\beta>0italic_β > 0, which is the case for hot market temperatures. These graphs shows that the stability of the Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n ansatz is higher than that of the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h. It is important to note that the imaginary conditions of Eq.(18) does not make the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h ansatz stable only but the Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n part of the ansatz also to be stable, also the Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n part of the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h ansatz is not divided by the width w𝑤witalic_w which makes only the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h part affected by the width as shown by figure(2). The effect of the width for both the Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n and the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h is inversely proportional to the chirp b𝑏bitalic_b and the gain of the chirp Im(b)𝐼𝑚𝑏Im(b)italic_I italic_m ( italic_b ) as shown by figure(2). The same relationship is observed for the volatility σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ and Im(b)𝐼𝑚𝑏Im(b)italic_I italic_m ( italic_b ) for both the Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n and sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h as shown by figure(3).

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The panels shows the stability of the Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n and the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h ansatz with respect to the adaptive market heat potential β𝛽\betaitalic_β, for A=10𝐴10A=10italic_A = 10, w=1𝑤1w=1italic_w = 1, σ=0.5𝜎0.5\sigma=0.5italic_σ = 0.5
Refer to caption
Figure 2: The panels shows the stability of the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h ansatz (right) and the Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n ansatz (left) with respect to the adaptive market heat potential β𝛽\betaitalic_β, for A=10𝐴10A=10italic_A = 10, σ=0.2𝜎0.2\sigma=0.2italic_σ = 0.2 with varying width w𝑤witalic_w
Refer to caption
Figure 3: The panels shows the stability of the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h ansatz (right) and the Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n ansatz (left) with respect to the adaptive market heat potential β𝛽\betaitalic_β, for A=10𝐴10A=10italic_A = 10, w=2𝑤2w=2italic_w = 2 with varying volatility σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ

V Numerical Simulation

In this section, direct numerical simulations for the IOPM are discussed. The forth-order Runger-Kutta method is used. The simulation employs a discrete scheme of time with discrete time steps of Δt=1/4000Δ𝑡14000\Delta t=1/4000roman_Δ italic_t = 1 / 4000.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: The panels shows the evolution of the Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n ansatz for w=2𝑤2w=2italic_w = 2, σ=0.2𝜎0.2\sigma=0.2italic_σ = 0.2 and β=10𝛽10\beta=10italic_β = 10 with the ansatz at initial time t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 and at time t=9𝑡9t=9italic_t = 9.
Refer to caption
Figure 5: The panels shows the evolution of the Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n ansatz for w=2𝑤2w=2italic_w = 2, σ=0.8𝜎0.8\sigma=0.8italic_σ = 0.8 and β=10𝛽10\beta=10italic_β = 10 with the ansatz at initial time t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 and at time t=9𝑡9t=9italic_t = 9.
Refer to caption
Figure 6: The panels shows the evolution of the Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n ansatz for w=8𝑤8w=8italic_w = 8, σ=0.2𝜎0.2\sigma=0.2italic_σ = 0.2 and β=10𝛽10\beta=10italic_β = 10 with the ansatz at initial time t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 and at time t=9𝑡9t=9italic_t = 9.
Refer to caption
Figure 7: The panels shows the evolution of the Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n ansatz for w=8𝑤8w=8italic_w = 8, σ=0.8𝜎0.8\sigma=0.8italic_σ = 0.8 and β=10𝛽10\beta=10italic_β = 10 with the ansatz at initial time t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 and at time t=9𝑡9t=9italic_t = 9.
Refer to caption
Figure 8: The panels shows the evolution of the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h ansatz for w=2𝑤2w=2italic_w = 2, σ=0.2𝜎0.2\sigma=0.2italic_σ = 0.2 and β=10𝛽10\beta=10italic_β = 10 with the ansatz at initial time t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 and at time t=9𝑡9t=9italic_t = 9.
Refer to caption
Figure 9: The panels shows the evolution of the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h ansatz for w=2𝑤2w=2italic_w = 2, σ=0.8𝜎0.8\sigma=0.8italic_σ = 0.8 and β=10𝛽10\beta=10italic_β = 10 with the ansatz at initial time t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 and at time t=9𝑡9t=9italic_t = 9.
Refer to caption
Figure 10: The panels shows the evolution of the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h ansatz for w=8𝑤8w=8italic_w = 8, σ=0.2𝜎0.2\sigma=0.2italic_σ = 0.2 and β=10𝛽10\beta=10italic_β = 10 with the ansatz at initial time t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 and at time t=9𝑡9t=9italic_t = 9.
Refer to caption
Figure 11: The panels shows the evolution of the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h ansatz for w=8𝑤8w=8italic_w = 8, σ=0.8𝜎0.8\sigma=0.8italic_σ = 0.8 and β=10𝛽10\beta=10italic_β = 10 with the ansatz at initial time t=0𝑡0t=0italic_t = 0 and at time t=9𝑡9t=9italic_t = 9.

The direct numerical simulation as shown by Figure(4) to Figure(11), shows that for both the Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n and sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h ansats the ansatz keep their relative shape for hot market temperatures, even thought the shape does not keep a smooth shape at a later time.

VI Conclusion

I was able to reproduce the conditions for the stability of the solitons solutions using both the sech𝑠𝑒𝑐sechitalic_s italic_e italic_c italic_h and the Gaussian𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛Gaussianitalic_G italic_a italic_u italic_s italic_s italic_i italic_a italic_n ansatz and they both agree with the literature. That is soliton solutions only exists for hot market temperatures, but for cold market temperatures solitons disintegrates into plane waves.

References

  • (1) Ş. T. Demiray and E. Ceren, “New solutions for iopm and (3+ 1)-dimensional nlwe in liquid with gas bubbles,” Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 2425–2436, 2022.
  • (2) K. Adama, P. Daouda, M. L. Justin, and Y. Pare, “Exact analytical solution of ivancevic options pricing model (iopm) or schrodinger’s equation via adm and sba methods,” Asian Research Journal of Mathematics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 50–61, 2022.
  • (3) Y. Bai, T. Chaolu, and S. Bilige, “The application of improved physics-informed neural network (ipinn) method in finance,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 3655–3667, 2022.
  • (4) U. Obaidullah and S. Jamal, “Analytical solutions of the nonlinear ivancevic options pricing model,” International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 245–259, 2023.
  • (5) O. Gonz et al., “Solving the ivancevic option pricing model using the elsaki-adomian decomposition method,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 515–525, 2015.
  • (6) S. Edeki, O. Ugbebor, and O. González-Gaxiola, “Analytical solutions of the ivancevic option pricing model with a nonzero adaptive market potential,” International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 187–198, 2017.
  • (7) O. González-Gaxiola, S. Edeki, O. Ugbebor, and J. R. de Ch’avez, “Solving the ivancevic pricing model using the he’s frecuency amplitude formulation,” European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 631–637, 2017.
  • (8) P. Veeresha and D. Kumar, “Analysis and dynamics of the ivancevic option pricing model with a novel fractional calculus approach,” Waves in Random and Complex Media, pp. 1–18, 2022.
  • (9) Q. Chen, H. M. Baskonus, W. Gao, and E. Ilhan, “Soliton theory and modulation instability analysis: The ivancevic option pricing model in economy,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 7843–7851, 2022.
  • (10) C. Gaafele, E. B. Madimabe, K. Ndebele, P. Otlaadisa, B. Mozola, T. Matabana, K. Seamolo, and P. Pilane, “Modulational instability of the coupled nonlinear volatility and option price model,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19887, 2024.
  • (11) M. Raheel, K. K. Ali, A. Zafar, A. Bekir, O. A. Arqub, and M. Abukhaled, “Research article exploring the analytical solutions to the economical model via three different methods,” 2023.
  • (12) M. Wróblewski and A. Myślinski, “Quantum dynamics approach for non-linear black-scholes option pricing,” Authorea Preprints, 2023.
  • (13) D. Anderson, “Variational approach to nonlinear pulse propagation in optical fibers,” Physical review A, vol. 27, no. 6, p. 3135, 1983.
  • (14) B. A. Malomed, “Pulse propagation in a nonlinear optical fiber with periodically modulated dispersion: variational approach,” Optics communications, vol. 136, no. 3-4, pp. 313–319, 1997.
  • (15) ——, “Variational methods in nonlinear fiber optics and related fields,” in Progress in optics.   Elsevier, 2002, vol. 43, pp. 71–193.
  • (16) S. Sabari, E. Wamba, K. Porsezian, A. Mohamadou, and T. Kofané, “A variational approach to the modulational-oscillatory instability of bose–einstein condensates in an optical potential,” Physics Letters A, vol. 377, no. 37, pp. 2408–2415, 2013.
  • (17) E. Wamba, A. Mohamadou, and T. C. Kofané, “A variational approach to the modulational instability of a bose–einstein condensate in a parabolic trap,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 41, no. 22, p. 225403, 2008.
  • (18) E. Wamba, S. Sabari, K. Porsezian, A. Mohamadou, and T. Kofané, “Dynamical instability of a bose-einstein condensate with higher-order interactions in an optical potential through a variational approach,” Physical Review E, vol. 89, no. 5, p. 052917, 2014.
  • (19) A. I. Nicolin and R. Carretero-González, “Nonlinear dynamics of bose-condensed gases by means of a q-gaussian variational approach,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 387, no. 24, pp. 6032–6044, 2008.
  • (20) R. Rusin, R. Kusdiantara, and H. Susanto, “Variational approximations of soliton dynamics in the ablowitz-musslimani nonlinear schrödinger equation,” Physics Letters A, vol. 383, no. 17, pp. 2039–2045, 2019.
  • (21) S. Curilef, A. Plastino, and A. Plastino, “Tsallis’ maximum entropy ansatz leading to exact analytical time dependent wave packet solutions of a nonlinear schrödinger equation,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 392, no. 11, pp. 2631–2642, 2013.
  • (22) J. Rossi, R. Carretero-González, and P. Kevrekidis, “Non-conservative variational approximation for nonlinear schrödinger equations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.07040, 2015.
  • (23) D. A. Lott, A. Henriquez, B. J. Sturdevant, and A. Biswas, “A numerical study of optical soliton-like structures resulting from the nonlinear schrödinger’s equation with square-root law nonlinearity,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 207, no. 2, pp. 319–326, 2009.
  • (24) V. G. Ivancevic, “Adaptive-wave alternative for the black-scholes option pricing model,” Cognitive Computation, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17–30, 2010.
  • (25) H. Kleinert, Path integrals in quantum mechanics, statistics, polymer physics, and financial markets.   World scientific, 2009.
  • (26) V. G. Ivancevic, “Quantum neural computation for option price modelling,” arXiv preprint arXiv:0903.0680, 2009.
  • (27) T. Dauxois and M. Peyrard, Physics of solitons.   Cambridge University Press, 2006.