Blackening S-folds
Adolfo Guarino , Anik Rudra , Colin Sterckx and Mario Trigiante
a Departamento de Física, Universidad de Oviedo,
Avda. Federico García Lorca 18, 33007 Oviedo, Spain.
b Instituto Universitario de Ciencias y Tecnologías Espaciales de Asturias (ICTEA),
Calle de la Independencia 13, 33004 Oviedo, Spain.
c School of Physics and Mandelstam Institute for Theoretical Physics,
University of the Witwatersrand, Wits, 2050, South Africa.
d INFN, Sezione di Padova,
Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, Italy.
e Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24,
I-10129 Turin, Italy and INFN, Sezione di Torino, Italy.
adolfo.guarino@uniovi.es , anikrudra23@gmail.com colin.sterckx@pd.infn.it , mario.trigiante@polito.it
Contents
1 Introduction and motivation
The study of four-dimensional (4D) supersymmetric black holes (BHs) and their embeddings in string theory and M-theory provides an exciting road to address fundamental questions in quantum gravity. Within the context of ten-dimensional (10D) and eleven-dimensional (11D) supergravities – the low-energy limits of string theory and M-theory, respectively – a particularly simple example of black hole, the so-called universal black hole [1, 2], has captured much of attention in recent years. Its simplicity as a 4D solution, together with its various embeddings in string/M-theory, have made the universal black hole a central object of study also in light of the AdS/CFT correspondence [3].
Let us first introduce the universal black hole that will play a central role in this work. It is a black hole of Reissner–Nordström type, extremal (zero temperature) and, importantly, it asymptotes to an AdS4 geometry with radius at infinity (). The 4D spacetime metric is given by
(1.1) |
with
(1.2) |
and where is the metric on a Riemann surface of genus describing the horizon at radial distance . The geometry (1.1)-(1.2) is supported by a Maxwell field with field strength
(1.3) |
endowing the BH with a constant magnetic charge being set by supersymmetry. In the near-horizon region , the geometry becomes with fixed ratios
(1.4) |
between the relevant length scales. Finally, the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy of the universal AdS4 BH is given by111 where is the radius of a Riemann surface of genus .
(1.5) |
The universal AdS4 BH we have just introduced can be framed within the context of minimal , supergravity with the graviphoton being associated with the abelian gauge group . In its simplest realisation, it describes a (BPS) supersymmetric solution of pure supergravity in presence of a cosmological constant . The bosonic part of the Lagrangian reads
(1.6) |
where supersymmetry fixes the radius of the asymptotic AdS4 region and the mass of the single (complex) gravitino in the theory as . Via the AdS/CFT correspondence, the universal AdS4 black hole is dual to a universal renormalisation group (RG) flow across dimensions. This is a supersymmetric flow connecting a three-dimensional SCFT3 dual to the AdS4 vacuum at (UV) to a one-dimensional superconformal quantum mechanics dual to the AdS2 factor of the near-horizon geometry at (IR). The RG flow is triggered by the action of a topological twist in the SCFT3 along its exact superconformal R-symmetry. The precise identification of the SCFT3 depends on the string/M-theory embedding of the universal AdS4 black hole. Placing the SCFT3 on and computing the topologically twisted index of [4] at large (which counts the number of supersymmetric ground states), the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy (1.5) is expected to be recovered in any string/M-theory embedding of the universal AdS4 BH.
The above story actually generalises to a much larger class of quarter-BPS AdS4 black holes in supergravity coupled to matter fieds. This was first established in the impressive work [5] (and its extension [6]) in the context of M-theory. The chosen supergravity model was the so-called STU-model [7]. This model describes the -invariant sector of the maximal supergravity [8] that arises from the dimensional reduction of 11D supergravity on the seven-sphere [9]. Unlike for the minimal setup discussed before, the STU-model couples the supergravity multiplet to abelian vector multiplets and hypermultiplets, i.e. . The three vector multiplets add three abelian vectors and three complex scalars to the (bosonic) Lagrangian of the minimal model (1.6). Also the cosmological constant in (1.6) gets replaced by a non-trivial scalar potential . The larger gauge group of the STU-model then allows for a generalisation of the universal AdS4 BH in (1.1)-(1.3) to include three additional (magnetic [5] and electric [6]) charges associated with the vectors in the vector multiplets, as well as non-trivial profiles for the scalars [10]. Lastly, the AdS4 vacuum chosen in [5, 6] to describe the asymptotic region () of the black holes was the maximally supersymmetric222 within the STU-model. Freund–Rubin background of 11D supergravity [11] AdS/CFT dual to the ABJM [12] SCFT3. Then the explicit computations carried out in [5, 6] using localisation techniques showed a perfect matching between the topologically twisted index of ABJM on at large and the gravitational entropy of this multi-charge class of AdS4 black holes with running scalars in the STU-model. Finally, the universal AdS4 BH in (1.1)-(1.3) is recovered as the simplest solution with (constant) vanishing scalars and non-zero magnetic charge along the exact superconformal R-symmetry of the ABJM theory.
A holographic counting of black hole microstates has also been performed in the context of massive type IIA strings [13, 14]. The relevant supergravity model is the extended STU-model of [15]. This model describes a -invariant sector of the maximal supergravity [16] that arises from the dimensional reduction of massive type IIA supergravity on the six-sphere [17]. The extended STU-model couples the supergravity multiplet to abelian vector multiplets, as in the previous M-theory case, but also to hypermultiplet, i.e. . The need to include the (universal) hypermultiplet stems from the fact that, upon dimensional reduction to four dimension, the ten-dimensional dilaton lies in such a hypermultiplet. The abelian gauge group of the extended STU-model in the massive IIA context turns out to be featuring a non-compact generator. The universal AdS4 black hole was presented in [18]. Its asymptotic () region approaches the background of massive IIA supergravity with symmetry dual to a super-Chern–Simons-matter theory at level (given by the Romans mass parameter [19]) and simple gauge group [20]. Constructing explicitly the non-universal multi-charge black holes with running scalars becomes much more complicated in the presence of hypermultiplets. However, although such BH solutions have not been constructed yet, a careful analysis of the horizon data was enough to carry out a holographic counting of BH microstates in [13, 14] along the lines of the M-theory case.
In this work we continue the above program and present, amongst other solutions, the universal AdS4 black hole in the context of type IIB strings. The paper is summarised as follows. In Section 2 we construct the extended STU-model of relevance in the type IIB context. We obtain it as a -invariant sector of the maximal supergravity that arises from the reduction of type IIB supergravity on including an duality twist along the [21]. We reformulate the model as an supergravity coupled to matter multiplets with an abelian gauge group . In Section 3 we first carry out an exhaustive classification of solutions suitable to describe the near-horizon geometry of black holes. Then we present the universal AdS4 black hole that asymptotes any solution in the two-parameter -family of S-fold backgrounds of type IIB supergravity dual to the conformal manifold of S-fold CFT3’s [22]. In Section 4, fetching techniques from the Exceptional Field Theory (ExFT) of [23], we present the uplift of the universal AdS4 black holes that asymptote the S-fold with symmetry at [24], as well as the S-fold with symmetry at [21]333See [25] for a judicious rewriting of the S-fold of [21] closer to the nomenclature used in this work.. As a byproduct, we also discuss some higher-dimensional aspects of an unexpected two-parameter family of -BPS solutions that uplift to -BPS S-fold backgrounds of type IIB supergravity, with , and feature parametrically-controlled scale separation. In Section 5 we conclude and discuss some future directions. Two appendices are included at the end with technical aspects of the supergravity construction as well as with a set of first-order BPS equations in matter-coupled supergravity.
2 An STU-model from type IIB on
Our starting point is the maximal () supergravity in four dimensions (4D) with gauge group
(2.1) |
Labeling the fundamental representation of by an index , the bosonic sector of the theory consists of the metric (spin-) field , electric and magnetic vector (spin-) fields, and spin- fields serving as coordinates in the scalar geometry described by the coset space
(2.2) |
As stated in the introduction, this maximal supergravity has been shown to accommodate a rich structure of solutions [26, 27, 24, 28] that uplift to non-geometric S-fold backgrounds of type IIB supergravity [21, 27, 29, 24, 30, 31, 25] (see [32] for an overview).
All the couplings in the Lagrangian of a maximal supergravity in 4D are encoded in an object called the embedding tensor [33]. Such a tensor specifies how the (local) gauge group G of the supergravity, also known as the gauging, is embedded into the (global) duality group of the ungauged theory. More concretely, the embedding tensor carries fundamental indices of and is subject to a set of linear constraints so that lives in the irreducible representation (irrep) of . In addition, in order to define a consistent gauged supergravity, the embedding tensor must obey a set of quadratic constraints (all the details can be found in [33], see also [34, 35] for reviews). We frame this work within the gauged maximal supergravity with a gauging of the dyonic type investigated in [21]. Using the group-theoretical branching rule under , which translates into an index splitting of the form , the embedding tensor of the theory has components
(2.3) |
given in terms of the two symmetric matrices
(2.4) |
The constants and denote the gauge coupling and an electromagnetic parameter in the maximal supergravity, respectively [21].
2.1 invariant sector: STU model
Up to our knowledge, all the known solutions in the maximal supergravity (including the flows of [36, 37]) were constructed within an Einstein-scalar setup, namely, vector fields were always set to zero. In this work we will be interested in charged black holes, so both electric and magnetic vector fields will generically be turned on. In order to have a simple supergravity model where to search for charged solutions we will mod-out the maximal supergravity by a specific group. As we show in Appendix A, this particular gives rise to the most general supergravity model capturing the entire -family of AdS4 vacua of the maximal theory as solutions. In the basis, the group is generated by
(2.5) |
together with the identity element and . Therefore, we will construct the invariant sector of the maximal supergravity by retaining those fields that are invariant under the action of (2.5).
The vectors in the maximal theory that are invariant under the action generated by (2.5) are
(2.6) |
together with their magnetic duals. They span the gauge group
(2.7) |
where each factor is respectively generated by the generators444We use the conventions in the appendix of [38] regarding the generators of in the basis (see eqs - therein). These split into the generators of , which are of the form with , and the completion to given by generators of the form .
(2.8) |
The scalar geometry of the invariant sector we are interested in is identified with
(2.9) |
and is encoded in the following coset representative. The factor describes a special Kähler (SK) geometry, involves the following generators
(2.10) |
and has a coset representative
(2.11) |
with . The factor describes a quaternionic Kähler (QK) geometry, involves the following generators
(2.12) |
together with
(2.13) |
and has a coset representative
(2.14) |
with and . Finally, the coset representatives in (2.11) and (2.14) can be used to introduce a scalar-dependent matrix
(2.15) |
As we will show in a moment, this invariant sector of the maximal theory can be reformulated as an supergravity coupled to vector multiplets and hypermultiplets.
2.2 reformulation of the STU-model
Let us present the reformulation of the invariant model described above as an supergravity coupled to vector multiplets and hypermultiplets. The Lagrangian is given by
(2.16) |
The scalar fields in the vector multiplets and hypermultiplets – we respectively denote them () and () – span the factorised scalar geometry previously identified, namely,
(2.17) |
While the scalars in the vector multiplets are not charged under the gauge group (2.7), the covariant derivatives of the scalars in the hypermultiplets are given by
(2.18) |
with and . These covariant derivatives depend on the embedding tensor and the Killing vectors specifying the gauging of in (2.7).
The two-form field strengths for the (electric) vector fields entering (2.16), with , read
(2.19) |
and generically involve two-form tensor fields as dictated by the embedding tensor . The two-forms , as well as the magnetic vectors , do not carry independent dynamics but enter the topological term in (2.16). We have explicitly verified that the full Lagrangian in (2.16) matches the one computed directly in the maximal theory using the formulation of [33].
2.2.1 Vector multiplets
We will parameterise the three complex scalars in the vector multiplets as
(2.20) |
They describe the special Kähler geometry in terms of a set of holomorphic sections
(2.21) |
The Kähler potential associated with is given by in terms of the symplectic product of vectors
(2.22) |
defined using the antisymmetric invariant matrix of . We take the holomorphic sections to be
(2.23) |
which satisfy for a prepotential function
(2.24) |
The Kähler potential gives rise to a Kähler metric of the form
(2.25) |
The kinetic terms and generalised theta angles for the dynamical vectors in the Lagrangian (2.16) are encoded in the matrix
(2.26) |
An explicit computation yields
(2.27) |
in terms of and where we have introduced the quantities
(2.28) |
Defining and , we can introduce a symmetric, real and negative-definite scalar matrix
(2.29) |
which will be used later on when describing the attractor equations in (3.11). This matrix satisfies the relations and , where is a redefined (non-holomorphic) set of sections with Kähler covariant derivatives given by .
2.2.2 Hypermultiplets
The four hypermultiplets contain sixteen real scalars serving as coordinates in the quaternionic Kähler geometry . The geometry is given by
(2.30) |
with and where we have introduced the notation , with , to describe the scalars parameterising the Heisenberg fiber of the QK geometry.
The matrix depends on the complex scalars , with , parameterising the special Kähler manifold of the c-map. More specifically, it has the structure given in (2.29), namely,
(2.31) |
with the building blocks
(2.32) |
and
(2.33) |
As a result, the complex scalars span a scalar geometry with metric
(2.34) |
The geometry can be described in terms of a cubic prepotential [39], a set of sections with and , and a Kähler potential from which the metric (2.34) follows.
2.2.3 Embedding tensor, scalar potential and topological term
The STU-model incorporates a gauging of specified by an embedding tensor of the form
(2.35) |
and involves four Killing vectors () of the QK geometry (2.30). The non-compact and factors associated with the and isometries are dyonically gauged by the combinations of vectors and , respectively. The compact factor in the gauge group associated with the isometry is electrically gauged by . Lastly, the compact factor in the gauge group associated with the isometry is electrically gauged by . The dictionary between these vectors and the ones of the maximal theory in (2.6) reads
(2.36) |
and similarly for the magnetic ones. From a ten-dimensional perspective, the two compact isometries descend from the isometries of the internal S5 in the type IIB reduction. Lastly, the electric field-strengths (2.19) entering the Lagrangian (2.16)
(2.37) |
where and are two-form potentials whose role will be clarified later on when discussing the topological term in (2.16).
Scalar potential
In order to compute the scalar potential in (2.16) and the covariant derivatives of the hyperscalars in (2.18), we must identify the four Killing vectors entering the gauging. The first Killing vector is given by
(2.38) |
and has a prepotential
(2.39) |
whereas the second, third and fourth Killing vectors are
(2.40) |
The three Killing vectors in (2.40) can be expressed in a very compact form in terms of the sections in the SK basis of the QK geometry. Following [40] they can be expressed as
(2.41) |
in terms of the electric section components and the three -matrices
(2.42) |
and
(2.43) |
The associated prepotentials are also constructed directly from the -matrices in (2.42) and (2.43) as
(2.44) |
Equipped with the above data it is straightforward to construct the scalar potential in (2.16) for the STU-model using the symplectically covariant expression [41, 42]
(2.45) |
with and , and where we have introduced symplectic Killing vectors and moment maps in order to maintain symplectic covariance [43].
Topological term
The topological term in (2.16) reads
(2.46) |
where the two-form potentials and (previously introduced in (2.37)) are associated with the two non-compact isometries and that are gauged dyonically by the embedding tensor (2.35). These two-form potentials do not carry an independent dynamics as they are dual to scalar currents by virtue of the equations of motion of the magnetic vectors. For example, the equation of motion of yields the duality relation
(2.47) |
The equation of motion of then sets a duality relation between and a different scalar current.
3 Supersymmetric solutions
In this section we present some analytic and supersymmetric solutions of the model without and with vector fields.
3.1 AdS4 solutions (S-folds)
The vanishing of all fermionic supersymmetry variations translates into the conditions [44]
(3.1) |
where is the gravitino mass matrix expressed in terms of Pauli matrices and . The three conditions in (3.1) follow from the vanishing of the hyperini, gaugini and gravitini supersymmetry variations, respectively.
The algebraic system (3.1) can be solved in full generality. It gives maximally symmetric AdS4 solutions with radius
(3.2) |
preserving supersymmetry. The locus in the scalar field space is given by
(3.3) |
together with
(3.4) |
This solution is spanned by five moduli . The gauge symmetries are spanned by the vectors
(3.5) |
This allows us to fix . With this gauge fixing, and a final redefinition of the scalar fields of the form
(3.6) |
one finds a mapping between our moduli fields and the ones in [22]. Within the STU-model, the spectrum of scalar fluctuations around these AdS4 vacua shows a dependence on the two moduli fields 555When further truncating to the S2T-model, the mass spectrum turns out to be independent of ..
The two moduli fields parameterise flat directions of the scalar potential which, via the AdS4/CFT3 correspondence, are dual to marginal operators spanning a conformal manifold of S-fold CFT3’s [22]. At generic values of the corresponding vacuum preserves supersymmetry and residual symmetry both within the STU-model and also in the maximal theory. However there are two special cases:
- •
-
•
Case : this AdS4 vacuum features supersymmetry and a residual symmetry enhancement in the maximal theory. Its uplift to an S-fold solution of type IIB supergravity was presented in [24]. Note that all the scalars in (3.4) spanning the Heisenberg fiber of the QK geometry (2.30) are zero in this solution.
We will focus on these two special AdS4 S-fold solutions later on when presenting the type IIB uplift of the universal AdS4 black hole that asymptotes S-fold solutions at infinity.
3.2 solutions
Let us now consider non-maximally symmetric solutions. In particular, let us investigate solutions of the form with a spacetime metric given by
(3.7) |
where and are the AdS2 and the radii, respectively. The ansatz for the vector and tensor fields supporting the geometry is given by
(3.8) |
where () for a spherical (hyperbolic) geometry . Lastly, the scalars and are taken to be constant functions.
It will prove convenient to introduce a vector of charges of the form
(3.9) |
with
(3.10) |
so that depends on the constant vector charges as well as on the - components of the tensor fields in (3.8). As in [43], we can choose the temporal gauge which, when combined with the last equation in (B.3), implies that in the BPS equations (B.2). Therefore, must also be constant functions and the tensor fields can be gauged away by virtue of the additional tensor gauge symmetry given by a one-form gauge parameter [33].
The existence of quarter-BPS solutions with the above ansatz requires a set of algebraic equations, known as the attractor equations, given by [43]
(3.11) |
defined in terms of a central charge , the scalar matrix in (2.29) and . The phase is associated with the complex function
(3.12) |
which depends on the central charge and a superpotential . The attractor equations (3.11) must be supplemented with a charge quantisation condition
(3.13) |
and a set of compatibility constraints of the form
(3.14) |
where . The second equation in (3.14) is automatically satisfied by the temporal gauge fixing condition . We refer the reader to [43] for a detailed derivation of the attractor equations (3.11)-(3.14) and, more generally, for a derivation of the first-order BPS equations collected in Appendix B from which (3.11)-(3.14) follow.
In order to solve the attractor equations we apply the following strategy. We first solve the third equation in (3.11), namely, and then complete the solution by solving the remaining equations in (3.11)-(3.14). The equation implies
(3.15) |
together with
(3.16) |
Therefore, there are two different branches of solutions: the first one has with being restricted by (3.15). the second one has with being restricted by (3.15). It is also instructive to look at the first equation in (3.14) together with the charge quantisation condition in (3.13). When combined with (3.15) they give the four conditions
(3.17) |
which connect with the discussion below (2.35). Recalling that the non-compact and factors in the gauge group are dyonically gauged by and , respectively, the first and second conditions in (3.17) set the non-compact (magnetic) charges to zero. On the other hand, the combinations of -generators666We denote by a generator of .
(3.18) |
are respectively gauged by
(3.19) |
Then the third condition in (3.17) sets the charge of the solution, whereas the fourth condition in (3.17) forbids a charge whenever .
A detailed study of the full set of attractor equations in (3.11)-(3.14) gives two classes of solutions with being (locally) a hyperboloid . The first class has the scalars fixed at their values (3.3)-(3.4) in the AdS4 S-folds, thus generically having . As we will show, this class of solutions describes the horizon of the universal AdS4 black hole that asymptotes to the -family of S-folds in Section 3.1. The second class of solutions has and comes along with two arbitrary (real) parameters. Upon tuning of the parameters we will show the existence of a regimen in which scale separation between the AdS2 and the factors of the geometry occurs.
3.2.1 Universal BH that asymptotes to the -family of S-folds
The first class of solutions to the attractor equations (3.11)-(3.14) generically has . The scalars are set to their values (3.3)-(3.4) at the -family of AdS4 S-folds. The charges as well as the and radii get also fixed to the values
(3.20) |
Then, provided , it follows that so that the horizon geometry is (locally) a two-dimensional hyperboloid . The phase in (3.11) gets also fixed to where the sign is correlated with the ones in (3.20). Note that the linear combinations of non-compact vectors and entering the gauge connection have no magnetic charge, namely,
(3.21) |
On the contrary, the electric dual combinations
(3.22) |
are fixed to non-zero values but they are associated with linear combinations of vectors not entering the gauge connection.
The above class of solutions of the attractor equations can be seen as the near-horizon geometry of the universal black hole that asymptotes to the -family of S-folds. The metric of this universal AdS4 black hole is given by (1.1)-(1.2) with the hyperbolic horizon being located at . The vectors supporting the black hole take the form (3.8) where the charges and the horizon data are given in (3.20). Finally, the gravitational entropy density computed from the horizon data (3.20) reads
(3.23) |
which agrees with (1.5) provided (3.2) and, consistently, turns out to be independent of the AdS4 moduli spanning the conformal manifold of S-fold CFT’s. As a check of the results, we have explicitly verified that the above universal black hole with constant scalars given in (3.3)-(3.4) solves the set of first-order BPS equations presented in Appendix B.
3.2.2 A two-parameter family of solutions
The second class of solutions to the attractor equations (3.11)-(3.14) fixes the scalars in the Heisenberg fiber of the QK geometry to zero, namely,
(3.24) |
as well as the radius to
(3.25) |
Taking again sets and is locally described by a hyperboloid . However, unlike for the universal black hole horizon in (3.20), the charges are not completely fixed. This time one finds that
(3.26) |
which again implies that the solutions have zero (magnetic) charge under the non-compact vector fields and entering the gauge connection. Nonetheless, the electric dual combinations and remain arbitrary in this class of solutions in contrast to what happened in (3.22). These two non-zero charges can be used to introduce a single non-zero complex charge
(3.27) |
in terms of which the second class of solutions is specified by the relations
(3.28) |
together with
(3.29) |
Three things are worth noticing. First, the conditions and require . Second, the relations (3.28) and (3.29) possess an exchange symmetry . Third, the horizon data in (3.20) for the universal black hole that asymptotes to the S-fold at is recovered at .
Finally, from (3.25) and (3.29), one observes that it is possible to introduce a hierarchy between the and factors in the spacetime geometry upon tuning of the free (complex) parameter . More concretely,
(3.30) |
Parameterising the solution of the first relation in (3.28) as requires for both and . Then one finds that
(3.31) |
and a hierarchy is achieved whenever or . However, having scale separation between AdS2 and in the four-dimensional solution by no means implies that scale separation also occurs in the corresponding ten-dimensional background. We will address this question in the next section when investigating the type IIB uplift of this second class of solutions.
4 Type IIB uplift
With the advent of Exceptional Field Theory (ExFT) [45] and Generalised Geometry [46, 47], a systematic procedure has been established to uplift maximal gauged supergravities (with a higher-dimensional origin) to string/M-theory [48, 49, 50]. The procedure, known as generalised Scherk–Schwarz (SS) reduction, is a generalisation of the ordinary SS twisted reduction of [51] that uses the exceptional symmetry, with , of the (ungauged) maximal supergravity in dimensions as a guiding principle.
The type IIB uplift of the maximal gauged supergravity is encoded in an generalised twist matrix and an scaling function . They depend on the six coordinates of the internal space which are in turn embedded in a larger -dimensional generalised geometry with coordinates transforming in the fundamental representation of the . The explicit form of and was given in [21]. Using this data, the field content of the maximal supergravity (r.h.s of (4.1))777The field content of the STU-model in Section 2 is embedded into maximal supergravity as follows. The scalar-dependent matrix is given in (2.15). The vectors are identified in (2.36). Lastly, we do not need to consider the two-form and as they can be gauge fixed to zero (see discussion below (3.10)). Consequently, the scalar currents sourcing them, see e.g. (2.47), do vanish for the specific scalar VEV’s and vector charges in the solutions we will uplift. and the one the -ExFT [23] (l.h.s of (4.1)) are related by a generalised SS ansatz of the form
(4.1) |
The last step in the uplift procedure requires to use the dictionary between the fields of -ExFT and those of ten-dimensional type IIB supergravity put forward in [52].888In this section we set without loss of generality. One can verify that the type IIB uplift following from the generalised SS ansatz in (4.1) is indeed insensitive to these parameters.
Employing the above procedure, the maximal supergravity in 4D has been shown to describe the dimensional reduction of type IIB supergravity on . Importantly, the reduction turns out to be non-geometric: it incorporates a non-trivial S-duality twist of the type IIB fields when looping along the specified by an twist matrix999We hope not to create confusion between the S-duality SL(2) fundamental index in (4.2), the coordinate along the in (4.9), and the adjoint index in (4.1).
(4.2) |
As a consequence of the S-duality twist, the entire dependence of the type IIB axion-dilaton matrix and two-form potentials on the coordinate along the is through the twist matrix (4.2), namely,
(4.3) |
with and being independent of . The S-duality twist in (4.2) induces a non-trivial hyperbolic monodromy
(4.4) |
that can be brought into a generic hyperbolic monodromy of the form
(4.5) |
provided the period becomes -dependent [21]. This renders both the S-folds and the solutions presented in this work full-fledged solutions in type IIB string theory.
In this section we will present the type IIB uplift of the universal black hole of Section 3.2.1 for two particular asymptotics: the S-fold with symmetry at and the S-fold with symmetry at . The most general universal BH asymptoting the -family of AdS4 solutions can be straightforwardly uplifted using the same procedure. However, in the absence of a simple uplift even for the AdS4 solutions at generic values of , we will refrain from presenting the lengthy output in this work. Finally, we will also present the type IIB uplift of the solutions in Section 3.2.2 particularised to the case . We will show that these solutions uplift to supersymmetric S-fold backgrounds with that admit parametrically-controlled scale separation, and discuss how the supergravity approximation breaks down in the limit of infinite scale separation.
4.1 Uplift of the universal BH that asymptotes to the S-fold
We use the conventions and coordinates of [32] to describe the internal geometry. The is parameterised by a periodic coordinate of period whereas the is understood as two 2-spheres and with polar and azimuthal angles , with , fibered over an interval .
The ten-dimensional type IIB metric receives a contribution from the four-dimensional vector in (3.19) associated with the R-symmetry in (3.18). This vector then becomes the Kaluza–Klein (KK) vector in the dimensional reduction, namely,
(4.6) |
where we have substituted the value of at the universal BH solution (3.20). One then sees that the R-symmetry is geometrically realised as the Killing vector in . The ten-dimensional metric then reads
(4.7) |
where the external spacetime metric is that of the universal BH in (1.1)-(1.2) and where
(4.8) |
The metric on the internal space is given by
(4.9) |
with
(4.10) |
and the non-singular warping factor reads
(4.11) |
As for the type IIB S-fold backgrounds, the dependence on the coordinate of the type IIB fields transforming under S-duality is encoded in the SL twist matrix in (4.2). The type IIB axion-dilaton matrix is given by
(4.12) |
in terms of the -independent matrix
(4.13) |
The twisted two-form gauge potentials get contributions from the scalars, as well as from the KK and non-compact vectors in 4D. They are given by
(4.14) |
with
(4.15) |
The self-dual five-form flux of type IIB is -independent and only gets contributions from the KK vector and the scalars. It reads
(4.16) |
where . The first line is the Hodge dual of the second one, and the third and fourth lines are the Hodge dual of the fifth and sixth ones. The solution preserves a symmetry associated with shifts of the azimuthal angles on the two -spheres. Lastly, we have verified that the uplift presented here solves the equations of motion of type IIB supergravity in the Einstein’s frame.
4.2 Uplift of the universal BH that asymptotes to the S-fold
We use once again the conventions and coordinates of [32]. The continues being parameterised by whereas the is now understood as a three-sphere fibered over a two-sphere . The coordinates on are the three angles , and . On the we use polar and azimuthal angles and .101010We use “upper letters” to distinguish the internal angles and from the external spacetime coordinates and on the hyperboloid . Lastly, in order to make symmetries more manifest, we also introduce a set of left-invariant forms on defined as
(4.17) |
As in the previous case, the ten-dimensional type IIB metric receives a contribution from the four-dimensional vector in (3.19) associated with the R-symmetry in (3.18). This vector becomes again the KK vector upon the identification
(4.18) |
so that the R-symmetry is geometrically realised as the vector on . Following (4.8), this leads us to introduce a “covariantised” version of in (4.17), namely,
(4.19) |
With the above definitions, the ten-dimensional metric reads
(4.20) |
where the external metric is again the universal BH metric in (1.1)-(1.2). The metric on the internal is now given by
(4.21) |
with
(4.22) |
The non-singular warping factor reads
(4.23) |
The type IIB axion-dilaton has the twisted structure in (4.3) and it is specified by the -independent (untwisted) matrix
(4.24) |
The twisted two-form gauge potentials get again contributions from the scalars and from the KK and non-compact vectors in 4D. They are given by
(4.25) |
Finally, the self-dual five-form only receives contributions from the scalars and the KK vector in 4D. It takes the form
(4.26) | ||||
As in the previous case, we have arranged the different terms so that the first and second lines are the Hodge duals of each other. Moreover, the contributions of the third and fourth lines are dual to the contributions of the last two lines. The solution preserves an symmetry where is realised as rotations in the -plane. Lastly, we have also checked explicitly that the above ten-dimensional solution solves the equations of motion of type IIB supergravity in the Einstein’s frame.
4.3 Uplift of the AdS solutions and scale separation
After having uplifted two examples of the universal BH, we present the type IIB uplift of the solutions in Section 3.2.2. Our goal is to establish whether or not the scale separation between AdS2 and pointed out in (3.31) actually extends to a scale-separated AdS2 vacuum in ten dimensions within the regime of validity of supergravity. To this end it will be sufficient to determine the 10D metric and the axion-dilaton matrix.
A properly scale-separated AdS2 vacuum requires it not to be fibered over the rest of the geometry. In other words, the KK vector should not have components along the AdS2 coordinates yielding a ten-dimensional type IIB background of the form with . For the solutions in Section 3.2.2, this occurs whenever in (3.31), namely, along the -family of solutions parameterised by
(4.27) |
with . We will focus on the uplift of this -family of solutions for which (3.31) simplifies to
(4.28) |
The AdS2 radius is therefore parametrically smaller than the radius by a factor . As we will see in a moment, the two limiting values are equivalent since they are related by a discrete symmetry exchanging the roles of and in the solution. Also, the near-horizon geometry of the universal BH asymptoting the S-fold in the previous section is recovered at .
Let us investigate the uplift of the -family of solutions in Section 3.2.2 with . We start by introducing a set of internal embedding coordinates , with , adapted to the three commuting isometries describing a maximal subgroup inside the isometry group of . These embedding coordinates are parametrically given by
(4.29) |
in terms of coordinates , with , that have ranges and so that . The ten-dimensional geometry can be written in terms of two functions
(4.30) |
that only depend on the coordinates and the parameter . Being independent of the three angles , the functions (4.30) specify an internal geometry that features a symmetry.
The ten-dimensional type IIB metric takes a contribution from the KK vector which is identified with
(4.31) |
This KK vector is independent of the parameter so the R-symmetry is geometrically realised as the Killing vector in any member of the -family of solutions. The ten-dimensional metric takes the form
(4.32) |
where and with and given in (3.7) with the radii in (4.28). The warping factor entering (4.32) reads
(4.33) |
and the metric on takes the form
(4.34) |
The uplift of the type IIB axion-dilaton yields
(4.35) |
in terms of the -twist matrix in (4.2) and the rotation matrix along the -plane
(4.36) |
Note the symmetry under the exchange followed by . This makes it sufficient to explore the range . Finally, from the ten-dimensional metric in (4.32) and (4.34), we can read off the relevant scales involved in the solution. These are
(4.37) |
where denotes the period of the coordinate on the internal . The period is independent of the scaling parameter and is determined by the integer specifying the monodromy in (4.5). The apparent shrinking of when can be reinterpreted as a change of units by virtue of the trombone symmetry of type IIB supergravity. We always assume scales to be larger than (e.g. ) for the supergravity approximation to be reliable. As a result, we conclude that the parametrically-controlled scale separation holds in ten dimensions.
SUGRA and EFT approximations in the limit
In the limit of large scale separation, i.e. , one must check whether the supergravity (SUGRA) approximation is still a valid approximation. Otherwise, various corrections to the solution, e.g., higher-derivative corrections, should be taken into account. The SUGRA regime corresponds to the first order expansion in both and , where is the string coupling and corresponds to any tensor built from the curvature. In other words, we must verify that and . From the axion-dilaton matrix (4.35), we observe that the relevant ratio determining in the parameterisation of (4.3) remains finite in the scale-separated limit . More concretely,
(4.38) |
However the curvature corrections become large in the limit of infinite separation . The ten-dimensional Ricci tensor diverges in this limit signaling a breaking of the SUGRA approximation. Therefore, we cannot trust our solution in this limit.
On the other hand, any two-dimensional effective field theory (EFT) description of this solution should also break down in the limit . From the internal geometry in (4.34), we expect a tower of light KK modes to appear in this limit. The reason why is the following. Since KK masses must be computed in units of the AdS2 radius in (4.37), the order of magnitude of such KK masses is given by
(4.39) |
where denotes a characteristic length in the internal space. For the circle in the internal geometry we find a regular behaviour
(4.40) |
when . However, the internal becomes singular when and we expect a tower of light modes with masses
(4.41) |
coming from the KK modes propagating along the directions. This would cause the breaking of a standard two-dimensional EFT description.
5 Summary and final remarks
In this work we have embedded the universal AdS4 black hole solution of [1, 2] into type IIB supergravity. We have done it by first constructing such a black hole as a solution of the STU-model describing a invariant sector of the maximal supergravity in 4D and then, by employing techniques from exceptional field theory (in particular from the -ExFT), uplifting it to ten-dimensional type IIB supergravity. From a 4D perspective, the universal BH is quarter-BPS (it preserves two real supercharges) and can asymptote any of the -family of AdS4 solutions dual to the conformal manifold of S-fold CFT3’s [22]. However, for the sake of clarity, we have presented the type IIB ten-dimensional uplift only for two particular asymptotics: the S-fold with symmetry at and the S-fold with symmetry at .
In addition to the universal AdS4 black hole, we have also presented a two-parameter -family of solutions which are also quarter-BPS within the STU-model. However, these horizon-like solutions cannot be extended to a full-fledged universal BH, namely, they do not describe the near-horizon geometry of a universal BH. The reason for this is that the scalars are fixed by the attractor equations (3.11)-(3.14) to constant values that do not extremise the scalar potential. Upon uplift to ten dimensions, it turns out that the choice decouples from the rest of the geometry and yields a -family of supersymmetric S-fold backgrounds with . These can be interpreted as AdS2 supersymmetric S-folds in type IIB supergravity. To our knowledge, these are the first examples of such solutions. We observe that the parameter allows for a parametrically-controlled scale separation between and although the limit of infinite separation becomes pathological. The opposite limit recovers the ten-dimensional near-horizon geometry of the universal BH that asymptotes to the S-fold with symmetry.
The universal BH that asymptotes to the S-fold with symmetry plays a central role in the above story as it sits at the intersection between the two classes of solutions we have presented. On the one hand, it is the universal BH that asymptotes to the AdS4 vacuum located at in the conformal manifold of S-fold CFT3’s. On the other hand, its near-horizon region describes the solution at . This raises the issue of whether non-universal black holes with running scalars exist that connect an solution with at the horizon (IR) with an AdS4 vacuum with at infinity (UV). Such non-universal black holes must have running hyperscalars , thus making their analytic study more difficult. Still, a numerical exploration following the strategy in [18] could be performed. The BPS equations in the Appendix B can be solved numerically starting from the desired horizon solution with and perturbing it with irrelevant deformations describing how the solutions arrive at the geometry in the IR. Upon tuning of the deformation parameters, an AdS4 black hole (if it exists at all) could be numerically reconstructed. However, we expect the generic AdS2 flow constructed in this way to approach the four-dimensional incarnation of the D3-brane solution at (UV), in analogy with the AdS3 flows constructed in [37] or the Mkw3 flows (dual to RG-flows) constructed in [36]. From a holographic perspective, one such generic flows would describe a supersymmetric flow across dimensions which is triggered by the action of a topological twist and that connects (an anisotropic deformation of) placed on in the UV (with an -monodromy acting along ) to a supersymmetric quantum mechanics in the IR. We leave this dual field theory analysis for future investigation.
On the other hand, the -family of solutions we have presented turned out to accommodate a parametrically-controlled scale separation. It would be interesting to understand in more general terms which gauged supergravities admit scale-separated AdS2 solutions as solutions of the attractor equations (3.11). For example, do they require the gauging of non-compact groups or some specific matter content? It would also be interesting to investigate under what circumstances these scale-separated AdS2 solutions are compatible with the supergravity approximation and, if so, if they admit a two-dimensional effective field theory description. If still applicable in two dimensions, the distance conjecture of [53] may provide some obstruction to the existence of a SUGRA/2d EFT description of such solutions. In its original formulation, this conjecture predicts a breaking of any EFT description when a scalar field VEV is sent to infinite distance in moduli space. This breaking would be reflected in the appearance of a light tower of KK or winding modes whose mass goes as . Several generalisations involving parameters which are not scalar VEV’s (like black hole charges [54] or cosmological constants [55]) require to extend the notion of distance beyond the geodesic distance on the scalar moduli space. Our -family of solutions places us in a similar situation, namely, that of a space of solutions of an EFT, the type IIB supergravity. Since is not a modulus of a scalar potential, this analysis calls for an appropriate notion of distance along the lines of [56, 57]. If such a generalised notion of distance admits points at infinity, it would be interesting to investigate whether and how the EFT/SUGRA approximations break down when approaching those points. One possibility could be to explicitly compute the spectrum of KK excitations from a two-dimensional perspective using KK spectrometry techniques [58] suitably extended/adapted to the -ExFT [59, 60]. We leave this and related issues for (your?) future investigation.
Acknowledgements
The work of AG is supported by the Spanish national grant MCIU-22-PID2021-123021NB-I00. The research of AR is supported by NRF-TWAS doctoral Grant MND190415430760, UID 121811 and the Rodrigues J MITP Grant. AR and MT wish to thank Kevin Goldstein for useful discussions. The work of C.S. has been supported by an INFN postdoctoral fellowship, Bando 24736.
Appendix A Systematics of truncations
Here we discuss consistent truncations to models which capture the AdS4 vacuum. The couplings of the maximal theory expanded about this solution are encoded in the -tensor evaluated on the corresponding point in the moduli space. If is an invariance of this -tensor, it is a symmetry of the effective theory at and therefore, restricting to the singlet sector of defines a consistent truncation featuring as a vacuum. Clearly, contains the compact symmetry of the vacuum. In fact, it also contains a discrete extension thereof.
The -tensor at is described by the complex fermion-shift and their complex conjugates, computed in the same point. We shall consider the basis in which is diagonal. We split correspondingly the R-symmetry indices into , labelling the broken supersymmetries and , labelling the four preserved ones. In this basis, the non-vanishing entries of the two tensors read [61]:111111In eqs. (A), we use the convention that the indices , with no subscript, on the right-hand sides run from to and coincide with , or with , if the same letter on the left-hand side occurs with subscript 1 or 2, respectively.
(A.1) |
From inspection of the explicit forms of the two complex tensors, one finds that the most general element of leaving them invariant has the form:
(A.2) |
where
(A.3) |
and
Therefore, if , , while if , and . The group can therefore be a subgroup of and not just of the residual gauge symmetry. When , we can write in the form:
(A.4) |
where
is any with determinant . We can fix, with no loss of generality, .
We look for consistent truncations to supergravities which are singlet sectors of a suitable , highlighting the relevant choices for .
We start considering .
The eight gravitinos transform, with respect to in the
(A.5) |
If or , the decomposition of the supercharges under features no -singlet and the truncation is . If diagonal of the two subgroups of , then we have at least two -singlets among the gravitinos and the truncation is at least , since, under we have the following branching:
(A.6) |
If the resulting truncation has 1 vector and two quaternionic multiplets. The scalar manifold is:
(A.7) |
The complex scalar in the vector multiplet is described by a -model. Within this truncation the vacuum is , since there is just one singlet among the preserved supersymmetries. Choosing to be a non-abelian (discrete) subgroup of may enlarge the truncation to one with two vector multiplets defining a model and a quaternionic Kähler manifold which is still the c-map of the special Kähler one, namely . The vacuum is still . We can instead consider to be a dihedral group , of order , in , generated by a rotation by about the 3rd axis within the and a reflection in a plane containing the 3rd axis. The resulting truncation is still the above model, where now the vacuum is . The two preserved supersymmetries are one of the singlets in (A.6) and one of the directions in one of the two (3rd axis). If , the Dihedral group is isomorphic to , generated by the matrices in (2.5), and the truncation enlarges to the model considered in this paper, with scalar manifold:
(A.8) |
The matrix forms of in the of , in the basis in which is diagonal, are:
(A.9) |
From the above expressions, it is apparent that the resulting leaves only the two gravitinos along directions 7,8, invariant. These also belong to the massless supergravity multiplet at the vacuum. Therefore, in this model, the vacuum is . Note that inverting the sign of does not alter the truncation, whose supersymmetries are, however, embedded in the ones differently (along directions 3,4). Within this truncation the vacuum appears as .
Appendix B First-order BPS equations
Within the context of supergravity coupled to vector multiplets and hypermultiplets, a set of first-order BPS equations was derived in [43] using an ansatz for the spacetime metric of the form
(B.1) |
and a vector/tensor ansatz of the form (3.8). The set of BPS equations reads
(B.2) |
where the prime denotes a radial derivative and is the U(1) Kähler connection in . The system (B.2) must be supplemented with the charge quantisation condition in (3.13) and a set of additional constraints
(B.3) |
We refer to [43] for more details about the derivation of the BPS equations and the additional constraints.
References
- [1] L. J. Romans, Supersymmetric, cold and lukewarm black holes in cosmological Einstein-Maxwell theory, Nucl. Phys. B383 (1992) 395–415, [hep-th/9203018].
- [2] M. M. Caldarelli and D. Klemm, Supersymmetry of Anti-de Sitter black holes, Nucl. Phys. B545 (1999) 434–460, [hep-th/9808097].
- [3] J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113–1133, [hep-th/9711200].
- [4] F. Benini and A. Zaffaroni, A topologically twisted index for three-dimensional supersymmetric theories, JHEP 07 (2015) 127, [1504.03698].
- [5] F. Benini, K. Hristov and A. Zaffaroni, Black hole microstates in AdS4 from supersymmetric localization, JHEP 05 (2016) 054, [1511.04085].
- [6] F. Benini, K. Hristov and A. Zaffaroni, Exact microstate counting for dyonic black holes in AdS4, Phys. Lett. B 771 (2017) 462–466, [1608.07294].
- [7] M. Cvetic, M. J. Duff, P. Hoxha, J. T. Liu, H. Lu, J. X. Lu et al., Embedding AdS black holes in ten-dimensions and eleven-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B558 (1999) 96–126, [hep-th/9903214].
- [8] B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, N=8 Supergravity, Nucl.Phys. B208 (1982) 323.
- [9] B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, The Consistency of the Truncation in Supergravity, Nucl.Phys. B281 (1987) 211.
- [10] S. L. Cacciatori and D. Klemm, Supersymmetric AdS(4) black holes and attractors, JHEP 01 (2010) 085, [0911.4926].
- [11] P. G. Freund and M. A. Rubin, Dynamics of Dimensional Reduction, Phys.Lett. B97 (1980) 233–235.
- [12] O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena, N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals, JHEP 10 (2008) 091, [0806.1218].
- [13] S. M. Hosseini, K. Hristov and A. Passias, Holographic microstate counting for AdS4 black holes in massive IIA supergravity, JHEP 10 (2017) 190, [1707.06884].
- [14] F. Benini, H. Khachatryan and E. Milan, Black hole entropy in massive Type IIA, Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 035004, [1707.06886].
- [15] A. Guarino, BPS black hole horizons from massive IIA, JHEP 08 (2017) 100, [1706.01823].
- [16] A. Guarino and O. Varela, Dyonic ISO(7) supergravity and the duality hierarchy, JHEP 02 (2016) 079, [1508.04432].
- [17] A. Guarino and O. Varela, Consistent truncation of massive IIA on S6, JHEP 12 (2015) 020, [1509.02526].
- [18] A. Guarino and J. Tarrio, BPS black holes from massive IIA on S6, JHEP 09 (2017) 141, [1703.10833].
- [19] L. Romans, Massive N=2a Supergravity in Ten-Dimensions, Phys.Lett. B169 (1986) 374.
- [20] A. Guarino, D. L. Jafferis and O. Varela, The string origin of dyonic N=8 supergravity and its simple Chern-Simons duals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 091601, [1504.08009].
- [21] G. Inverso, H. Samtleben and M. Trigiante, Type II supergravity origin of dyonic gaugings, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 066020, [1612.05123].
- [22] N. Bobev, F. F. Gautason and J. van Muiden, The holographic conformal manifold of 3d = 2 S-fold SCFTs, JHEP 07 (2021) 221, [2104.00977].
- [23] O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, Exceptional Field Theory II: E7(7), Phys.Rev. D89 (2014) 066017, [1312.4542].
- [24] A. Guarino, C. Sterckx and M. Trigiante, supersymmetric S-folds, JHEP 04 (2020) 050, [2002.03692].
- [25] A. Giambrone, A. Guarino, E. Malek, H. Samtleben, C. Sterckx and M. Trigiante, Holographic evidence for nonsupersymmetric conformal manifolds, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 066018, [2112.11966].
- [26] G. Dall’Agata and G. Inverso, On the Vacua of N = 8 Gauged Supergravity in 4 Dimensions, Nucl.Phys. B859 (2012) 70–95, [1112.3345].
- [27] A. Guarino and C. Sterckx, S-folds and (non-)supersymmetric Janus solutions, JHEP 12 (2019) 113, [1907.04177].
- [28] A. Guarino and C. Sterckx, Flat deformations of type IIB S-folds, JHEP 11 (2021) 171, [2109.06032].
- [29] N. Bobev, F. F. Gautason, K. Pilch, M. Suh and J. Van Muiden, Janus and J-fold Solutions from Sasaki-Einstein Manifolds, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 081901, [1907.11132].
- [30] N. Bobev, F. F. Gautason, K. Pilch, M. Suh and J. van Muiden, Holographic interfaces in = 4 SYM: Janus and J-folds, JHEP 05 (2020) 134, [2003.09154].
- [31] A. Giambrone, E. Malek, H. Samtleben and M. Trigiante, Global properties of the conformal manifold for S-fold backgrounds, JHEP 06 (2021) 111, [2103.10797].
- [32] A. Guarino and C. Sterckx, Type IIB S-folds: flat deformations, holography and stability, PoS CORFU2021 (2022) 163, [2204.09993].
- [33] B. de Wit, H. Samtleben and M. Trigiante, The Maximal D=4 supergravities, JHEP 0706 (2007) 049, [0705.2101].
- [34] H. Samtleben, Lectures on Gauged Supergravity and Flux Compactifications, Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 214002, [0808.4076].
- [35] M. Trigiante, Gauged Supergravities, Phys. Rept. 680 (2017) 1–175, [1609.09745].
- [36] A. Guarino and C. Sterckx, S-folds and holographic RG flows on the D3-brane, JHEP 06 (2021) 051, [2103.12652].
- [37] A. Guarino and M. Suh, S-folds and AdS3 flows from the D3-brane, JHEP 11 (2022) 134, [2207.14015].
- [38] A. Guarino, CSOc superpotentials, Nucl. Phys. B900 (2015) 501–516, [1508.05055].
- [39] B. de Wit and A. Van Proeyen, Special geometry, cubic polynomials and homogeneous quaternionic spaces, Commun. Math. Phys. 149 (1992) 307–334, [hep-th/9112027].
- [40] H. Erbin and N. Halmagyi, Abelian hypermultiplet gaugings and BPS vacua in =2 supergravity, JHEP 05 (2015) 122, [1409.6310].
- [41] J. Michelson, Compactifications of type IIB strings to four-dimensions with nontrivial classical potential, Nucl.Phys. B495 (1997) 127–148, [hep-th/9610151].
- [42] B. de Wit, H. Samtleben and M. Trigiante, Magnetic charges in local field theory, JHEP 0509 (2005) 016, [hep-th/0507289].
- [43] D. Klemm, N. Petri and M. Rabbiosi, Symplectically invariant flow equations for , gauged supergravity with hypermultiplets, JHEP 04 (2016) 008, [1602.01334].
- [44] J. Louis, P. Smyth and H. Triendl, Supersymmetric Vacua in N=2 Supergravity, JHEP 1208 (2012) 039, [1204.3893].
- [45] O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, Exceptional Form of D=11 Supergravity, Phys.Rev.Lett. 111 (2013) 231601, [1308.1673].
- [46] A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable and D. Waldram, generalised geometry, connections and M theory, JHEP 02 (2014) 054, [1112.3989].
- [47] A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable and D. Waldram, Supergravity as Generalised Geometry II: and M theory, JHEP 03 (2014) 019, [1212.1586].
- [48] K. Lee, C. Strickland-Constable and D. Waldram, Spheres, generalised parallelisability and consistent truncations, 1401.3360.
- [49] O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, Consistent Kaluza-Klein Truncations via Exceptional Field Theory, JHEP 1501 (2015) 131, [1410.8145].
- [50] G. Inverso, Generalised Scherk-Schwarz reductions from gauged supergravity, JHEP 12 (2017) 124, [1708.02589].
- [51] J. Scherk and J. H. Schwarz, How to Get Masses from Extra Dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 153 (1979) 61–88.
- [52] A. Baguet, O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, Consistent Type IIB Reductions to Maximal 5D Supergravity, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 065004, [1506.01385].
- [53] H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, On the geometry of the string landscape and the swampland, Nuclear Physics B (Mar., 2007) 21 33.
- [54] Q. Bonnefoy, L. Ciambelli, D. Lüst and S. Lüst, Infinite black hole entropies at infinite distances and tower of states, Nuclear Physics B 958 (Sept., 2020) 115112.
- [55] D. Lüst, E. Palti and C. Vafa, Ads and the swampland, Physics Letters B 797 (Oct., 2019) 134867.
- [56] Y. Li, E. Palti and N. Petri, Towards AdS distances in string theory, JHEP 08 (2023) 210, [2306.02026].
- [57] E. Palti and N. Petri, A positive metric over DGKT vacua, JHEP 06 (2024) 019, [2405.01084].
- [58] E. Malek and H. Samtleben, Kaluza-Klein Spectrometry from Exceptional Field Theory, Phys. Rev. D 102, 106016 (2020) 102 (nov, 2020) 106016, [2009.03347].
- [59] G. Bossard, F. Ciceri, G. Inverso, A. Kleinschmidt and H. Samtleben, E9 exceptional field theory. Part I. The potential, JHEP 03 (2019) 089, [1811.04088].
- [60] G. Bossard, F. Ciceri, G. Inverso, A. Kleinschmidt and H. Samtleben, E9 exceptional field theory. Part II. The complete dynamics, JHEP 05 (2021) 107, [2103.12118].
- [61] A. Gallerati, H. Samtleben and M. Trigiante, The supersymmetric AdS vacua in maximal supergravity, JHEP 12 (2014) 174, [1410.0711].