Optimizing 5G-Advanced Networks for Time-critical Applications: The Role of L4S

One key advantage of L4S is its ability to effectively address latency issues. With the assistance of intermediate network nodes, users can seamlessly engage in real-time interaction, and enjoy a smoother and more immersive experience.

L4S reduces packet loss issues caused by congestion by utilizing packet marking instead of dropping. By reducing the probability of packet loss, L4S further minimizes the delay introduced by packet retransmission.

L4S strives to optimize data throughput without compromising latency. This means that L4S ensures a higher rate of service while maintaining low latency.

In conclusion, L4S provides significant advantages in terms of reduced latency, low packet loss, and optimized throughput, thus enhancing the overall performance and user satisfaction in various real-time applications and services.

Delay-sensitive traffic, such as XR video transmission, often utilizes sensitive flow control strategies that are easily preempted by aggressive flows, resulting in starvation. To mitigate this issue, L4S mandates the implementation of two independent queues in network devices, each with its own AQM policy to separate L4S traffic from classic traffic. This dual-queue mechanism effectively safeguards L4S flows from bandwidth competition, thereby ensuring low latency[10].

L4S redefines the usage of two unused bits in the IP header, known as ECN bits. In L4S, ECN plays two key roles. First, the ECN flag helps network nodes distinguish whether the traffic belongs to classic flows or L4S flows. When a network node detects the L4S ECN codepoint in the IP header is ECT(0) (the value of ECN bits is 10) or Not-ECT (the value of ECN bits is 00), it considers the flow as a classic flow. When it detects an L4S ECN codepoint of ECT(1) (the value of ECN bits is 01), it identifies it as an L4S flow. L4S network nodes use separate queues to schedule traffic for classic flows and L4S flows. Second, when the L4S maintains a relatively short queue length, the ECN codepoint of the packet remains ECT(1). However, when the queue length increases and congestion is imminent, the ECN codepoint of packets is probabilistically marked as CE (the value of ECN bits is 11). L4S AQM immediately responds to queue buildup with an extremely low threshold and simply marks packets that cannot be transmitted in time [11]. The probability of marking is related to the queue length. Upon receiving the marked packets, the receiver transmits ECN information to the sender in feedback packets, assisting with the sender’s rate control.

The congestion control algorithm utilized by L4S is known as Prague Congestion Control, which is a so-called ”scalable” congestion control algorithm that uses ECN marking [6]. Based on this congestion control algorithm, the sender can control the application rate with minimal or even no latency or loss, in order to match the network capacity.

The operational mechanism of L4S is displayed in Fig. 1. In the absence of the L4S mechanism (left side of Fig. 1), devices lack cooperation, leading to competitive resource acquisition where each sender adopts aggressive end-to-end congestion control strategies. End-to-end congestion control algorithms typically employ metrics such as packet loss, RTT, and delay gradient to regulate the congestion window. However, the presence of Bufferbloat leads to excessive delay, jitter, or packet loss resulting. Network nodes transmit packets using a best-effort approach, resulting in network congestion and a long-tail distribution of delays. Consequently, this degradation results in latency and overall network performance decline.

With the introduction of the L4S mechanism (right side of Fig. 1), the queue isolation mechanism and ECN-based marking strategy are employed. Firstly, the queue isolation mechanism facilitates the separate transmission of L4S flows and aggressive classic flows, ensuring that L4S flows are not affected by the large queues generated by classic flows. Secondly, the ECN-based marking strategy marks the IP header to CE and provides feedback from the receiver to the sender. This enables the sender to react promptly as the queue shows initial signs of congestion, reducing the bitrate and alleviating queue congestion. Based on intelligent queue management, L4S allows the buffer size to match the network bandwidth, fundamentally solving the impacts caused by large buffers. Furthermore, ECN utilizes marking instead of packet loss as a strategy, preventing L4S flows from experiencing the latency impact brought by retransmissions.

As mentioned above, through mechanisms like Queue Isolation, ECN-Based Marking Strategy, and Scalable Congestion Control, L4S ensures efficient bandwidth utilization and responsive congestion control for time-critical applications such as XR video transmission. The Queue Isolation mechanism protects delay-sensitive traffic from aggressive flows by utilizing independent queues with their own management policies. Additionally, the ECN-Based Marking Strategy allows for traffic differentiation and prompt reaction to congestion signs.

However, the implementation of the L4S also results in increased complexity for the system. Firstly, modifications to existing routing devices are necessary to equip them with queue isolation and ECN marking capabilities. It may complicate the queue management in routers. In addition, the complexity is not confined to hardware alone but also extends to the intricacies of protocol design. The L4S approach needs a joint optimization between the congestion control at the sender and the ECN marking strategies at routing nodes. Consequently, as compared to traditional transmission mechanisms, L4S must consider broader factors to ensure system stability across various aspects, presenting a substantial challenge to L4S system optimization.

XR applications demand high-bandwidth, low-latency communication for transmitting multimodal data and delivering real-time immersive experiences. To fulfil the user experience demands of XR services, the network should provide a minimum bandwidth of 1 Gbps and low-latency services with no more than 20 ms. L4S technology is well-suited for meeting the communication needs of XR applications. Through network resource scheduling and congestion control, L4S technology can provide higher data transmission throughput while ensuring low latency and low loss, thereby supporting real-time interaction and high-quality experiences in XR applications.

Cloud gaming, based on cloud computing and streaming media technology, relies on real-time game streaming via the internet. To deliver a good user experience and high-performance gaming, low latency and high bandwidth services are essential. L4S technology can offer low-latency communication services, minimizing the delay between users and games, and providing a real-time and smooth gaming experience.

Low latency and low loss communication are crucial for real-time decision-making and control in autonomous vehicle systems. L4S can improve the performance of vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communication, ensuring rapid and reliable data exchange. For low-latency data requirements such as sensor data, traffic information, and navigation commands, L4S reduces network transmission delay, enhancing the responsiveness of autonomous driving systems. Moreover, L4S uses marking instead of packet loss mechanisms to reduce the loss of critical data and enhance the reliability of information transmission in autonomous driving systems. Additionally, L4S enhances network throughput by providing adaptive congestion control and bandwidth allocation mechanisms to support the transmission of multiple data streams.

Edge computing typically needs to provide applications with services that have low latency and are energy-efficient. The use of L4S technology in edge computing not only provides a guarantee for low-latency transmission for edge computing services, supporting the integrity of time-sensitive data, but also enables the determination of transmission priorities according to application demands. By integrating information such as the distribution of node energy consumption, L4S can further optimize edge services that are aware of both delay and energy by expanding the ECN marking scheme, enhancing the overall service quality of the dynamic application placement that is sensitive to latency and energy awareness.

In digital twin systems, it is necessary for the digital twin to stay synchronized with objects in the real world. Therefore, data must be collected quickly and transmitted in real time to the virtual model for updates and analysis. The low-latency transmission provided by L4S technology ensures synchronization between the physical system and the virtual model, which is crucial for precise control and real-time prediction.

In order to maintain the consistency of the blockchain, nodes need to continuously synchronize data. L4S can enhance the communication performance within the blockchain network, ensuring fast and reliable data transmission. For example, when conducting cryptocurrency transactions, executing smart contracts, and other operations, L4S technology can improve the responsiveness of the blockchain system by reducing network transmission delay. Additionally, L4S enhances the transmission reliability of information in the blockchain system by using a marking rather than a packet loss mechanism to reduce the loss of important data.

In summary, L4S technology is essential for facilitating high-quality XR communication, cloud gaming, autonomous vehicle systems and other applications, through its ability to provide low-latency, low-loss, and scalable data transmission solutions. Furthermore, L4S also has considerable implications for a wide range of applications including real-time multimedia streaming, remote medical services, telemedicine, and IoT applications, which will not be elaborated here.

Considering the variability in radio conditions and traffic patterns, it is essential to develop effective algorithms that can swiftly detect congestion in both the gNB and UE by employing predictive techniques for channel and traffic conditions. Additionally, it is also important to ensure that these algorithms can work efficiently under different network topologies and conditions.

When the queue length exceeds a certain threshold, ECN starts marking. Generally speaking, setting a smaller threshold can lead to lower transmission latency [9]. However, different applications usually have different delay requirements. Therefore, how to set the ECN marking threshold according to different delay requirements of applications remains a significant challenge. In addition, it is also necessary to explore the optimal ECN marking probability and marking strategies under different congestion conditions in the uplink and downlink. Analyzing the trade-offs between direct marking in the IP PDU header by UE/gNB and the delayed marking through UPF is also crucial for the adoption of L4S technology in 5G.

Design L4S-based congestion control algorithms that collaborate with ECN marking strategies. These congestion control algorithms must effectively utilize congestion signals, such as ECN, to ensure timely rate adaptation without causing unnecessary rate reductions or triggering congestion in the network.

With the assistance of L4S, further optimize the transmission of delay-critical services through methods such as resource allocation. For example, by dynamically adjusting the link transmission rate, resource reservation, network slicing, etc., to ensure the experience of L4S users without excessively impacting other flows.

Assessing the implications of UE mobility on L4S performance, and understanding how to maintain consistent ECN marking and congestion detection while supporting handovers between gNBs.

Research based on the aforementioned topics can facilitate the better adaptation of L4S technology to 5G-Advanced networks, thereby further enhancing the quality of experience for real-time applications.