Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Effects of plasma nonuniformity on zero frequency zonal structure generation by drift Alfvén wave instabilities in toroidal plasmas

Zhiyong Qiu1,2, Guangyu Wei3, Liu Chen2,3,4, and Ruirui Ma2,5 1 Key laboratory of frontier physics in controlled nuclear fusion and Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, P.R.C
2 Center for Nonlinear Plasma Science and ENEA, C. R. Frascati, Italy
3 Institute for Fusion Theory and Simulation, School of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, P.R.C
4 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine CA 92697-4575, U.S.A.
5 Southwest Institute of Physics, P.O. Box 432, Chengdu 610041, P.R.C
Abstract

Effects of plasma nonuniformity on zero frequency zonal structure (ZFZS) excitation by drift Alfvén wave (DAW) instabilities in toroidal plasmas are investigated using nonlinear gyrokinetic theory. The governing equations describing nonlinear interactions among ZFZS and DAWs are derived, with the contribution of DAWs self-beating and radial modulation accounted for on the same footing. The obtained equations are then used to derive the nonlinear dispersion relation, which is then applied to investigate ZFZS generation in several scenarios. In particular, it is found that, the condition for zonal flow excitation by kinetic ballooning mode (KBM) could be sensitive to plasma parameters, and more detailed investigation is needed to understand KBM nonlinear saturation, crucial for bulk plasma transport in future reactors.

pacs:
52.30.Gz, 52.35.Bj,52.35.Fp, 52.35.Mw

I Introduction

Shear Alfvén waves (SAWs) are fundamental electromagnetic oscillations in magnetized plasmas Alfvén (1942). In magnetically confined fusion devices such as tokamaks, SAW instabilities driven unstable by energetic particles (EPs) including fusion alpha-particles could cause significant redistribution and transport loss of EPs, which can lead to degradation of the confinement of both EPs and thermal components in future reactors Fasoli et al. (2007); Chen and Zonca (2016). Thus, in-depth understanding of SAW related physics, including linear excitation, nonlinear evolution, and saturation, is crucial for understanding of fusion reactor performance. Among various channels for SAW instability nonlinear saturation, nonlinear excitation of zonal field structures (ZFS) is an important route Hasegawa et al. (1979); Lin et al. (1998); Chen et al. (2000); Rosenbluth and Hinton (1998); Diamond et al. (2005); Chen and Zonca (2012); Qiu et al. (2023), and has drawn research interest by both analytical theory Chen et al. (2001); Chen and Zonca (2012); Qiu et al. (2016a, b) and large-scale simulations Todo et al. (2010); Biancalani et al. (2021); Cheng et al. (2017); Dong et al. (2019); Chen et al. (2018) in the past decade.

Zonal field structures (ZFS) correspond to radial corrugations of plasma equilibrium, and are characterized by toroidally symmetric and usually poloidally symmetric structures in toroidal plasmas. ZFS are linearly stable to expansion free energy, and can be nonlinearly excited by microscopic drift wave (DW) turbulences including drift Alfvén waves (DAWs), and in this process, scatter DW/DAW into linearly stable short radial wavelength regime. Spontaneous excitation of zero-frequency zonal structure (ZFZS) by toroidal Alfvén eigenmode (TAE) Cheng et al. (1985) was initially investigated in Ref. Chen and Zonca (2012) using modulational instability methodology, where the contribution of zonal current (ZC) and zonal flow (ZF) were accounted for on the same footing. It was found that, for typical plasma parameters, ZF generation is possible as the pure Alfvénic state is broken, i.e., the nonlinear Reynolds and Maxwell stresses don’t exactly cancel each other, by toroidicity; and ZC generation is preferred with a much lower threshold condition, and can be estimated by |δBr/B0|O(104)similar-to𝛿subscript𝐵𝑟subscript𝐵0𝑂superscript104|\delta B_{r}/B_{0}|\sim O(10^{-4})| italic_δ italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | ∼ italic_O ( 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ), comparable to typical electromagnetic fluctuation level in present day tokamak experiments Heidbrink et al. (2007). Here, δBr𝛿subscript𝐵𝑟\delta B_{r}italic_δ italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the perturbed magnetic field associated with the primary TAE, and B0subscript𝐵0B_{0}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the equilibrium on-axis toroidal magnetic field. The ZFZS growth rate is approximately proportional to the amplitude of the pump TAE as the nonlinear drive overcomes the threshold due to frequency mismatch.

It was further found that, in the presence of resonant EP drive to TAE, ZF can be excited by TAE even when TAE amplitude is small, with the ZF growth rate being approximately twice of instaneous TAE growth rate Qiu et al. (2016b). This thresholdless “forced driven” (also called “passive excitation” in some literatures) process was shown to be dominated by the contribution of EPs to the curvature coupling term, and was observed by simulations of Alfvén instability nonlinear dynamics using both hybrid code Todo et al. (2010) and particle-in-cell codes Chen et al. (2018); Biancalani et al. (2021). A unified theory containing both the “forced driven” process and the spontaneous excitation was presented in Ref. 21, which shows that these two processes occur as the corresponding nonlinear contribution of EPs or thermal plasmas take over the nonlinear coupling. It is also found that, the forced-driven process can also occur as plasma nonuniformity associated with diamagnetic drift is accounted for, with the generated ZF amplitude being proportional to the local diamagnetic frequency Chen et al. (2023); Fang et al. (2024). In the following discussion, we will term the “forced driven” as “beat driven” based on recent advances of understanding Chen et al. (2024).

The above analysis and the obtained understanding, using TAE as a paradigm, can be applied to other SAW instabilities, with proper understanding of their respective properties. For example, it is shown in Ref. Qiu et al. (2016a) that, ZFZS can be excited by beta-induced Alfvén eigenmode (BAE) Heidbrink et al. (1993); Zonca et al. (1996); Zhang and Lin (2013); Cheng et al. (2017), with ZF dominating due to vanishing kBk_{\parallel B}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Here, kBk_{\parallel B}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the parallel wavenumber of BAE. The theory of Ref. Qiu et al. (2016a) may represent a series of low frequency Alfvén modes (LFAMs) Zonca et al. (1996); Chen and Zonca (2017); Heidbrink et al. (2021); Ma et al. (2022) that can be excited by both EPs and thermal plasmas in different spatiotemporal scales, with plasma nonuniformity expected to play important roles with their frequencies comparable to diamagnetic frequency ωsubscript𝜔\omega_{*}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT due to plasma nonuniformity. In this work, we will extend the theory of ZFZS generation to nonuniform plasma, motivated by the recent discovery that, system nonuniformity can both qualitatively and quantitatively affect the parametric decay of kinetic Alfvén waves (KAW) due to the diamagnetic effects Chen et al. (2022a). Here, for nonuniformity, we mean the plasma profile associated with ωsubscript𝜔\omega_{*}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, as the previous analysis labelled “uniform”, is intrinsically nonuniform due to, e.g., toroidicity of magnetic geometry. The following analysis, using general WKB representation, can be applied to DAWs of a broad frequency range, from TAE down to kinetic ballooning mode (KBM) frequency range Zonca et al. (1999); Kim et al. (1993), and is expected to be crucial for KBM with ωωsimilar-to𝜔subscript𝜔\omega\sim\omega_{*}italic_ω ∼ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and higher toroidal mode numbers with kρiO(1)less-than-or-similar-tosubscript𝑘perpendicular-tosubscript𝜌𝑖𝑂1k_{\perp}\rho_{i}\lesssim O(1)italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ italic_O ( 1 ). Here, ω𝜔\omegaitalic_ω is the mode frequency, ωsubscript𝜔\omega_{*}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the characteristic ion diamagnetic frequency due to profile nonuniformity, ksubscript𝑘perpendicular-tok_{\perp}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the perpendicular wavenumber, and ρisubscript𝜌𝑖\rho_{i}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the ion Larmor radius. The present work, is thus, of particular importance to future reactor scale tokamaks with thermal to magnetic pressure ratio significantly higher than present day machines, and KBM is expected to be crucial for thermal plasma transport, while there is still ongoing debate on effects of ZFS in saturating KBM Dong et al. (2019); Ishizawa et al. (2019); Ren et al. (2022). The analysis, however, is general, and can be applied to other DAW instabilities, e.g., TAE, though the effects of system nonuniformity are expected to be less important for TAE, in that |ω/ω|1much-less-thansubscript𝜔𝜔1|\omega_{*}/\omega|\ll 1| italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω | ≪ 1 for typical scenarios.

The rest of the manuscript is organized as follows. In Sec. II, the theoretical model and governing equations are introduced, which are then used in Sec. III to derive the modulational dispersion relation for ZFZS generation by DAWs. The obtained nonlinear dispersion relation, is applied to study the effects of plasma nonuniformity on ZFZS generation in Sec. IV. Finally, summary and discussion are presented in Sec. V.

II Theoretical model

For the nonlinear excitation of ZFZS by DAW instabilities in nonuniform plasmas, the analysis follows closely that of Ref. Chen and Zonca (2012), using the methodology of modulational instability. The ballooning representation is adopted for the pump DAW and its lower/upper sidebands due to ZFZS modulation:

δϕ0𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ0\displaystyle\delta\phi_{0}italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== A0ei(n0ϕm^0θω0t)jeijθΦ0(xj)+c.c.,formulae-sequencesubscript𝐴0superscript𝑒𝑖subscript𝑛0italic-ϕsubscript^𝑚0𝜃subscript𝜔0𝑡subscript𝑗superscript𝑒𝑖𝑗𝜃subscriptΦ0𝑥𝑗𝑐𝑐\displaystyle A_{0}e^{i(n_{0}\phi-\hat{m}_{0}\theta-\omega_{0}t)}\sum_{j}e^{-% ij\theta}\Phi_{0}(x-j)+c.c.,italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i ( italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϕ - over^ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ - italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_i italic_j italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x - italic_j ) + italic_c . italic_c . ,
δϕ±𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕplus-or-minus\displaystyle\delta\phi_{\pm}italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== A±e±i(n0ϕm^0θω0t)ei(kZrωZt)subscript𝐴plus-or-minussuperscript𝑒plus-or-minus𝑖subscript𝑛0italic-ϕsubscript^𝑚0𝜃subscript𝜔0𝑡superscript𝑒𝑖subscript𝑘𝑍𝑟subscript𝜔𝑍𝑡\displaystyle A_{\pm}e^{\pm i(n_{0}\phi-\hat{m}_{0}\theta-\omega_{0}t)}e^{i(k_% {Z}r-\omega_{Z}t)}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± italic_i ( italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϕ - over^ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ - italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i ( italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r - italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
×jeijθΦ0(xj)+c.c.,\displaystyle\times\sum_{j}e^{\mp ij\theta}\Phi_{0}(x-j)+c.c.,× ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∓ italic_i italic_j italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x - italic_j ) + italic_c . italic_c . ,

while ZFZS potential can be taken as

δϕZ=AZei(kZrωZt).𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑍subscript𝐴𝑍superscript𝑒𝑖subscript𝑘𝑍𝑟subscript𝜔𝑍𝑡\displaystyle\delta\phi_{Z}=A_{Z}e^{i(k_{Z}r-\omega_{Z}t)}.italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i ( italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r - italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .

In the above expressions, A𝐴Aitalic_A is the mode envelope amplitude, n𝑛nitalic_n is the toroidal mode number, m^^𝑚\hat{m}over^ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG is the reference poloidal mode number, m=m^+j𝑚^𝑚𝑗m=\hat{m}+jitalic_m = over^ start_ARG italic_m end_ARG + italic_j is the poloidal mode number, Φ0(xj)subscriptΦ0𝑥𝑗\Phi_{0}(x-j)roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x - italic_j ) is the parallel mode structure, subscripts “00”, “±plus-or-minus\pm±” and “Z𝑍Zitalic_Z” represent pump DAW, its upper/lower sidebands and ZFZS, and frequency/wave number matching conditions for nonlinear mode coupling are applied.

The analysis follows closely the standard modulational instability approach, where the nonlinear ZFZS and DAW sidebands equations are derived, which then couple and yield the nonlinear modulational instability dispersion relation for ZFZS excitation. While “modulational instability” is used, the process can go beyond spontaneous excitation by modulational instability, and beat-driven process can also be included in the general equations Qiu et al. (2017); Chen et al. (2024). The perturbed distribution function, δfs𝛿subscript𝑓𝑠\delta f_{s}italic_δ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with s=e,i𝑠𝑒𝑖s=e,iitalic_s = italic_e , italic_i, obeys the nonlinear gyrokinetic equation Frieman and Chen (1982):

δfs=(eT)sδϕF0s+exp(𝝆s)δHs,𝛿subscript𝑓𝑠subscript𝑒𝑇𝑠𝛿italic-ϕsubscript𝐹0𝑠subscript𝝆𝑠𝛿subscript𝐻𝑠\displaystyle\delta f_{s}=-\left(\frac{e}{T}\right)_{s}\delta\phi F_{0s}+\exp(% -\bm{\rho}_{s}\cdot\nabla)\delta H_{s},italic_δ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - ( divide start_ARG italic_e end_ARG start_ARG italic_T end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_exp ( - bold_italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ ∇ ) italic_δ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (1)

with the nonadiabatic particle response δHs𝛿subscript𝐻𝑠\delta H_{s}italic_δ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT derived from nonlinear gyrokinetic equation Frieman and Chen (1982)

(t+vl+𝐯d)δHssubscript𝑡subscript𝑣parallel-tosubscript𝑙subscript𝐯𝑑𝛿subscript𝐻𝑠\displaystyle\left(\partial_{t}+v_{\parallel}\partial_{l}+\mathbf{v}_{d}\cdot% \nabla\right)\delta H_{s}( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ ∇ ) italic_δ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== i(eT)s(ωωt)F0sJkδLk𝑖subscript𝑒𝑇𝑠𝜔subscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡subscript𝐹0𝑠subscript𝐽𝑘𝛿subscript𝐿𝑘\displaystyle-i\left(\frac{e}{T}\right)_{s}\left(\omega-\omega^{t}_{*}\right)F% _{0s}J_{k}\delta L_{k}- italic_i ( divide start_ARG italic_e end_ARG start_ARG italic_T end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω - italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (2)
Λk′′kJkδLkδHk′′.subscriptsuperscriptΛsuperscript𝑘superscript𝑘′′subscript𝐽superscript𝑘𝛿subscript𝐿superscript𝑘𝛿subscript𝐻superscript𝑘′′\displaystyle-\Lambda^{k^{\prime}}_{k^{\prime\prime}}J_{k^{\prime}}\delta L_{k% ^{\prime}}\delta H_{k^{\prime\prime}}.- roman_Λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .

Here, l𝑙litalic_l is the arc length along the equilibrium magnetic field line, 𝐯d𝐛^×[(v2/2)lnB0+v2𝐛^𝐛^]subscript𝐯𝑑^𝐛delimited-[]subscriptsuperscript𝑣2perpendicular-to2subscript𝐵0subscriptsuperscript𝑣2parallel-to^𝐛^𝐛\mathbf{v}_{d}\equiv\mathbf{\hat{b}}\times[(v^{2}_{\perp}/2)\nabla\ln B_{0}+v^% {2}_{\parallel}\mathbf{\hat{b}}\cdot\nabla\mathbf{\hat{b}}]bold_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ over^ start_ARG bold_b end_ARG × [ ( italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 2 ) ∇ roman_ln italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG bold_b end_ARG ⋅ ∇ over^ start_ARG bold_b end_ARG ] is the magnetic drift velocity, 𝐛^𝐁0/B0^𝐛subscript𝐁0subscript𝐵0\mathbf{\hat{b}}\equiv\mathbf{B}_{0}/B_{0}over^ start_ARG bold_b end_ARG ≡ bold_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the unit vector along the equilibrium magnetic field line, JkJ0(kρi)subscript𝐽𝑘subscript𝐽0subscript𝑘perpendicular-tosubscript𝜌𝑖J_{k}\equiv J_{0}(k_{\perp}\rho_{i})italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) is Bessel function of zero index accounting for finite Larmor radius (FLR) effects, δLkδϕ(kv/ω)δψ𝛿subscript𝐿𝑘𝛿italic-ϕsubscript𝑘parallel-tosubscript𝑣parallel-to𝜔𝛿𝜓\delta L_{k}\equiv\delta\phi-(k_{\parallel}v_{\parallel}/\omega)\delta\psiitalic_δ italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ italic_δ italic_ϕ - ( italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω ) italic_δ italic_ψ with δψωδA/(ck)𝛿𝜓𝜔𝛿subscript𝐴parallel-to𝑐subscript𝑘parallel-to\delta\psi\equiv\omega\delta A_{\parallel}/(ck_{\parallel})italic_δ italic_ψ ≡ italic_ω italic_δ italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ( italic_c italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) and δψ=δϕ𝛿𝜓𝛿italic-ϕ\delta\psi=\delta\phiitalic_δ italic_ψ = italic_δ italic_ϕ corresponding to vanishing parallel electric field δE𝛿subscript𝐸parallel-to\delta E_{\parallel}italic_δ italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in the ideal MHD condition, ωt=ω[1+η(v2/vth23/2)]subscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡subscript𝜔delimited-[]1𝜂superscript𝑣2subscriptsuperscript𝑣2𝑡32\omega^{t}_{*}=\omega_{*}[1+\eta(v^{2}/v^{2}_{th}-3/2)]italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 1 + italic_η ( italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 3 / 2 ) ] is the diamagnetic drift frequency associated with plasma nonuniformity with ω=ckθT/(qBLn)subscript𝜔𝑐subscript𝑘𝜃𝑇𝑞𝐵subscript𝐿𝑛\omega_{*}=-ck_{\theta}T/(qBL_{n})italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - italic_c italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T / ( italic_q italic_B italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), η=Ln/LT𝜂subscript𝐿𝑛subscript𝐿𝑇\eta=L_{n}/L_{T}italic_η = italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Lnsubscript𝐿𝑛L_{n}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and LTsubscript𝐿𝑇L_{T}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the scale lengths of density and temperature nonuniformity, respectively, and Λk′′k(c/B0)𝐛^𝐤′′×𝐤subscriptsuperscriptΛsuperscript𝑘superscript𝑘′′𝑐subscript𝐵0^𝐛superscript𝐤′′superscript𝐤\Lambda^{k^{\prime}}_{k^{\prime\prime}}\equiv(c/B_{0})\mathbf{\hat{b}}\cdot% \mathbf{k^{\prime\prime}}\times\mathbf{k^{\prime}}roman_Λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ ( italic_c / italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) over^ start_ARG bold_b end_ARG ⋅ bold_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × bold_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT denotes the perpendicular nonlinearity with the matching condition 𝐤=𝐤+𝐤′′𝐤superscript𝐤superscript𝐤′′\mathbf{k}=\mathbf{k}^{\prime}+\mathbf{k}^{\prime\prime}bold_k = bold_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + bold_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

The governing field equations, in the β1much-less-than𝛽1\beta\ll 1italic_β ≪ 1 limit with magnetic compression being negligible, can be derived from the quasi-neutrality condition

n0e2Ti(1+TiTe)=s=e,iesJkδHk,subscript𝑛0superscript𝑒2subscript𝑇𝑖1subscript𝑇𝑖subscript𝑇𝑒subscript𝑠𝑒𝑖delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑒𝑠subscript𝐽𝑘𝛿subscript𝐻𝑘\displaystyle\frac{n_{0}e^{2}}{T_{i}}\left(1+\frac{T_{i}}{T_{e}}\right)=\sum_{% s=e,i}\left\langle e_{s}J_{k}\delta H_{k}\right\rangle,divide start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( 1 + divide start_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s = italic_e , italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ italic_e start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ , (3)

and nonlinear gyrokinetic vorticity equation Chen et al. (2001); Chen and Hasegawa (1991)

c24πωk2Blk2Blδψk+n0e2Ti(1ωiω)(1Γ0)δϕksuperscript𝑐24𝜋subscriptsuperscript𝜔2𝑘𝐵𝑙subscriptsuperscript𝑘2perpendicular-to𝐵𝑙𝛿subscript𝜓𝑘subscript𝑛0superscript𝑒2subscript𝑇𝑖1subscript𝜔absent𝑖𝜔1subscriptΓ0𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑘\displaystyle\frac{c^{2}}{4\pi\omega^{2}_{k}}B\frac{\partial}{\partial l}\frac% {k^{2}_{\perp}}{B}\frac{\partial}{\partial l}\delta\psi_{k}+\frac{n_{0}e^{2}}{% T_{i}}\left(1-\frac{\omega_{*i}}{\omega}\right)(1-\Gamma_{0})\delta\phi_{k}divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_π italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_B divide start_ARG ∂ end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_l end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_B end_ARG divide start_ARG ∂ end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_l end_ARG italic_δ italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) ( 1 - roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (4)
e2TiωiωηiF0J02(v2vth232)δϕksuperscript𝑒2subscript𝑇𝑖subscript𝜔absent𝑖𝜔subscript𝜂𝑖delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝐹0subscriptsuperscript𝐽20superscript𝑣2subscriptsuperscript𝑣2𝑡32𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑘\displaystyle-\frac{e^{2}}{T_{i}}\frac{\omega_{*i}}{\omega}\eta_{i}\left% \langle F_{0}J^{2}_{0}\left(\frac{v^{2}}{v^{2}_{th}}-\frac{3}{2}\right)\right% \rangle\delta\phi_{k}- divide start_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ) ⟩ italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
s=e,iqωkJkωdδHkssubscript𝑠𝑒𝑖subscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑞subscript𝜔𝑘subscript𝐽𝑘subscript𝜔𝑑𝛿subscript𝐻𝑘𝑠\displaystyle-\sum_{s=e,i}\left\langle\frac{q}{\omega_{k}}J_{k}\omega_{d}% \delta H_{k}\right\rangle_{s}- ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s = italic_e , italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ divide start_ARG italic_q end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=\displaystyle== iωkΛk′′k[c24πk′′2lδψklδψk′′ωkωk′′\displaystyle-\frac{i}{\omega_{k}}\Lambda^{k^{\prime}}_{k^{\prime\prime}}\left% [\frac{c^{2}}{4\pi}k^{\prime\prime 2}_{\perp}\frac{\partial_{l}\delta\psi_{k^{% \prime}}\partial_{l}\delta\psi_{k^{\prime\prime}}}{\omega_{k^{\prime}}\omega_{% k^{\prime\prime}}}\right.- divide start_ARG italic_i end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG roman_Λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG
+e(JkJkJk′′)δLkδHk′′].\displaystyle\left.+\left\langle e(J_{k}J_{k^{\prime}}-J_{k^{\prime\prime}})% \delta L_{k^{\prime}}\delta H_{k^{\prime\prime}}\right\rangle\right].+ ⟨ italic_e ( italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_δ italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ ] .

The terms on the left hand side of equation (4) are the field line bending, inertial, and curvature coupling terms, with the SAW dispersion relation being straightforwardly obtained from the balance of the former two, while the curvature coupling term plays crucial role in the low frequency SAW spectrum including KBM Kim et al. (1993); Zonca et al. (1999). The terms on the right hand side correspond to nonlinear Maxwell stress (MX) and gyrokinetic Reynolds stress (RS), respectively. In the following analysis, electron force balance equation, i.e., nonlinear Ohm’s law, is sometimes used alternatively to simplify the analysis.

III General equation for ZFZS generation

The zonal current equation can be derived from the parallel component of the electron force balance equation,

δE+𝐛^δ𝐮×δ𝐁=0,𝛿subscript𝐸parallel-to^𝐛𝛿subscript𝐮perpendicular-to𝛿subscript𝐁perpendicular-to0\displaystyle\delta E_{\parallel}+\mathbf{\hat{b}}\cdot\mathbf{\delta u}_{% \perp}\times\mathbf{\delta B}_{\perp}=0,italic_δ italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + over^ start_ARG bold_b end_ARG ⋅ italic_δ bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × italic_δ bold_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 , (5)

describing ZC generation due to dynamo effects. Here, noting δ𝐮δϕ×𝐛^/B0𝛿subscript𝐮perpendicular-to𝛿italic-ϕ^𝐛subscript𝐵0\mathbf{\delta u}_{\perp}\equiv\nabla\delta\phi\times\mathbf{\hat{b}}/B_{0}italic_δ bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ ∇ italic_δ italic_ϕ × over^ start_ARG bold_b end_ARG / italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and δ𝐁=×δA𝐛^𝛿subscript𝐁perpendicular-to𝛿subscript𝐴parallel-to^𝐛\mathbf{\delta B}_{\perp}=\nabla\times\delta A_{\parallel}\mathbf{\hat{b}}italic_δ bold_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∇ × italic_δ italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG bold_b end_ARG, and that for ZFZS with n/m=0/0𝑛𝑚00n/m=0/0italic_n / italic_m = 0 / 0 and thus δEZ=tδAZ\delta E_{\parallel Z}=-\partial_{t}\delta A_{\parallel Z}italic_δ italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, one has, for ZC generation due to pump DAW and its upper/lower sidebands coupling,

iωZδAZ\displaystyle i\omega_{Z}\delta A_{\parallel Z}italic_i italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== cB0kZkθ0k0[(σω0ωZσ0ω0)δϕ0δϕ\displaystyle\frac{c}{B_{0}}k_{Z}k_{\theta 0}k_{\parallel 0}\left[\left(\frac{% \sigma_{*-}}{\omega_{0}-\omega_{Z}}-\frac{\sigma_{*0}}{\omega_{0}}\right)% \delta\phi_{0}\delta\phi_{-}\right.divide start_ARG italic_c end_ARG start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ ( divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (6)
(σ+ω0+ωZσ0ω0)δϕ0δϕ+],\displaystyle\left.-\left(\frac{\sigma_{*+}}{\omega_{0}+\omega_{Z}}-\frac{% \sigma_{*0}}{\omega_{0}}\right)\delta\phi_{0^{*}}\delta\phi_{+}\right],- ( divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] ,

with the expression of σk=δψk/δϕksubscript𝜎absent𝑘𝛿subscript𝜓𝑘𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑘\sigma_{*k}=\delta\psi_{k}/\delta\phi_{k}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_δ italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT given by

σk1+ττΓk+τ(F0/n0)J02(ωit/ω)k(1ωe/ω)k,subscript𝜎absent𝑘1𝜏𝜏subscriptΓ𝑘𝜏subscriptdelimited-⟨⟩subscript𝐹0subscript𝑛0subscriptsuperscript𝐽20subscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡absent𝑖𝜔𝑘subscript1subscript𝜔absent𝑒𝜔𝑘\displaystyle\sigma_{*k}\equiv\frac{1+\tau-\tau\Gamma_{k}+\tau\langle(F_{0}/n_% {0})J^{2}_{0}(\omega^{t}_{*i}/\omega)\rangle_{k}}{(1-\omega_{*e}/\omega)_{k}},italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ divide start_ARG 1 + italic_τ - italic_τ roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_τ ⟨ ( italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω ) ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 - italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG , (7)

and again, σk=1subscript𝜎absent𝑘1\sigma_{*k}=1italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 corresponding to ideal MHD condition.

Noting σ±=σ0(ω0±ωZ,kZ)subscript𝜎absentplus-or-minussubscript𝜎absent0plus-or-minussubscript𝜔0subscript𝜔𝑍subscript𝑘𝑍\sigma_{*\pm}=\sigma_{*0}(\omega_{0}\pm\omega_{Z},k_{Z})italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), one has

σ±ω0±ωZσ0ω0=±ω0(σ0ω0)ωZ+122kr2(σ0ω0)kZ2.subscript𝜎absentplus-or-minusplus-or-minussubscript𝜔0subscript𝜔𝑍subscript𝜎absent0subscript𝜔0plus-or-minussubscript𝜔0subscript𝜎absent0subscript𝜔0subscript𝜔𝑍12superscript2subscriptsuperscript𝑘2𝑟subscript𝜎absent0subscript𝜔0subscriptsuperscript𝑘2𝑍\displaystyle\frac{\sigma_{*\pm}}{\omega_{0}\pm\omega_{Z}}-\frac{\sigma_{*0}}{% \omega_{0}}=\pm\frac{\partial}{\partial\omega_{0}}\left(\frac{\sigma_{*0}}{% \omega_{0}}\right)\omega_{Z}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial k^{2}_{r}% }\left(\frac{\sigma_{*0}}{\omega_{0}}\right)k^{2}_{Z}.divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = ± divide start_ARG ∂ end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG divide start_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (8)

Defining δAZ=ck0δψZ/ω0\delta A_{\parallel Z}=ck_{\parallel 0}\delta\psi_{Z}/\omega_{0}italic_δ italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_c italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT using the frequency and parallel wavenumber of the pump DAW, one has

δψZ𝛿subscript𝜓𝑍\displaystyle\delta\psi_{Z}italic_δ italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== iBkZkθ0ω0[ω0(σ0ω0)(δϕδϕ0+δϕ+δϕ0)\displaystyle\frac{i}{B}k_{Z}k_{\theta 0}\omega_{0}\left[\frac{\partial}{% \partial\omega_{0}}\left(\frac{\sigma_{*0}}{\omega_{0}}\right)(\delta\phi_{-}% \delta\phi_{0}+\delta\phi_{+}\delta\phi_{0^{*}})\right.divide start_ARG italic_i end_ARG start_ARG italic_B end_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ divide start_ARG ∂ end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) ( italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (9)
12ωZ2kr2(σ0ω0)kZ2(δϕδϕ0δϕ+δϕ0)].\displaystyle\left.-\frac{1}{2\omega_{Z}}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial k^{2}_{r% }}\left(\frac{\sigma_{*0}}{\omega_{0}}\right)k^{2}_{Z}(\delta\phi_{-}\delta% \phi_{0}-\delta\phi_{+}\delta\phi_{0^{*}})\right].- divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ] .

The first term on the right hand side of equation (9) comes from the frequency difference between the DAW sideband to that of the pump, and corresponds to the “beat-driven” of ZC that has been extensively studied Chen and Zonca (2012). The second term, on the other hand, comes from plasma nonuniformity and kinetic effects, will contribute to “spontaneous excitation” of ZC, and is not accounted for in previous publications, focusing on TAE frequency where ωsubscript𝜔\omega_{*}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT effects can be neglected due to the |ω/ω|1much-less-thansubscript𝜔𝜔1|\omega_{*}/\omega|\ll 1| italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω | ≪ 1 ordering typical of TAE Chen and Zonca (2012); Chen et al. (2022b).

The ZF equation can be derived from the nonlinear vorticity equation, by substituting the particle responses to DAWs into RS, and one obtains:

χiZδϕZ=ickZkθ0B0ωZ(αδϕ0δϕα+δϕ0δϕ+),subscript𝜒𝑖𝑍𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑍𝑖𝑐subscript𝑘𝑍subscript𝑘𝜃0subscript𝐵0subscript𝜔𝑍subscript𝛼𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ0𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕsubscript𝛼𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕsuperscript0𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ\displaystyle\chi_{iZ}\delta\phi_{Z}=-i\frac{ck_{Z}k_{\theta 0}}{B_{0}\omega_{% Z}}\left(\alpha_{-}\delta\phi_{0}\delta\phi_{-}-\alpha_{+}\delta\phi_{0^{*}}% \delta\phi_{+}\right),italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - italic_i divide start_ARG italic_c italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) , (10)

with

χiZ1ΓZTin0e2δϕZs=e,iqωJZωdδHZ¯subscript𝜒𝑖𝑍1subscriptΓ𝑍subscript𝑇𝑖subscript𝑛0superscript𝑒2𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑍subscript𝑠𝑒𝑖delimited-⟨⟩¯𝑞𝜔subscript𝐽𝑍subscript𝜔𝑑𝛿subscript𝐻𝑍\displaystyle\chi_{iZ}\equiv 1-\Gamma_{Z}-\frac{T_{i}}{n_{0}e^{2}\delta\phi_{Z% }}\sum_{s=e,i}\left\langle\overline{\frac{q}{\omega}J_{Z}\omega_{d}\delta H_{Z% }}\right\rangleitalic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ 1 - roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s = italic_e , italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ over¯ start_ARG divide start_ARG italic_q end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩ (11)

being the neoclassical inertial enhancement dominated by trapped particle contribution Rosenbluth and Hinton (1998), and

α±=subscript𝛼plus-or-minusabsent\displaystyle\alpha_{\pm}=italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = (JZJ±J0J±2)F0n0(1ωitω)±delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝐽𝑍subscript𝐽plus-or-minussubscript𝐽0subscriptsuperscript𝐽2plus-or-minussubscript𝐹0subscript𝑛0subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡absent𝑖𝜔plus-or-minus\displaystyle\left\langle(J_{Z}J_{\pm}J_{0}-J^{2}_{\pm})\frac{F_{0}}{n_{0}}% \left(1-\frac{\omega^{t}_{*i}}{\omega}\right)_{\pm}\right\rangle⟨ ( italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ (12)
\displaystyle-- (JZJ±J0J02)F0n0(1ωitω)0delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝐽𝑍subscript𝐽plus-or-minussubscript𝐽0subscriptsuperscript𝐽20subscript𝐹0subscript𝑛0subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡absent𝑖𝜔0\displaystyle\left\langle(J_{Z}J_{\pm}J_{0}-J^{2}_{0})\frac{F_{0}}{n_{0}}\left% (1-\frac{\omega^{t}_{*i}}{\omega}\right)_{0}\right\rangle⟨ ( italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩
\displaystyle-- c24π(k±2k02)k±k0σ0σ±ω0ω±.\displaystyle\frac{c^{2}}{4\pi}(k^{2}_{\perp\pm}-k^{2}_{\perp 0})\frac{k_{% \parallel\pm}k_{\parallel 0}\sigma_{*0}\sigma_{*\pm}}{\omega_{0}\omega_{\pm}}.divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG ( italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) divide start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG .

In deriving equation (10), the linear particle response to DAW has been used Chen et al. (2022b), i.e.,

δHAiL𝛿subscriptsuperscript𝐻𝐿𝐴𝑖\displaystyle\delta H^{L}_{Ai}italic_δ italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== eTi(1ωitω)AJAFMiδϕA,𝑒subscript𝑇𝑖subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡absent𝑖𝜔𝐴subscript𝐽𝐴subscript𝐹𝑀𝑖𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ𝐴\displaystyle\frac{e}{T_{i}}\left(1-\frac{\omega^{t}_{*i}}{\omega}\right)_{A}J% _{A}F_{Mi}\delta\phi_{A},divide start_ARG italic_e end_ARG start_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ,
δHAeL𝛿subscriptsuperscript𝐻𝐿𝐴𝑒\displaystyle\delta H^{L}_{Ae}italic_δ italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== eTe(1ωetω)AFMeδψA.𝑒subscript𝑇𝑒subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡absent𝑒𝜔𝐴subscript𝐹𝑀𝑒𝛿subscript𝜓𝐴\displaystyle-\frac{e}{T_{e}}\left(1-\frac{\omega^{t}_{*e}}{\omega}\right)_{A}% F_{Me}\delta\psi_{A}.- divide start_ARG italic_e end_ARG start_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .

Here, the superscript “L” denotes linear response, and the subscript “A” denotes DAW, which can be used for both the pump DAW and its lower/upper sidebands.

In the long wavelength |kρi|1much-less-thansubscript𝑘perpendicular-tosubscript𝜌𝑖1|k_{\perp}\rho_{i}|\ll 1| italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | ≪ 1 and uniform plasma |ωit/ω|1much-less-thansubscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡absent𝑖𝜔1|\omega^{t}_{*i}/\omega|\ll 1| italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω | ≪ 1 limit, equation (10) recovers the results of Ref. 9, with α±subscript𝛼plus-or-minus\alpha_{\pm}italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT denoting MX and RS competition, and χiZ1.6bZq2/ϵsimilar-to-or-equalssubscript𝜒𝑖𝑍1.6subscript𝑏𝑍superscript𝑞2italic-ϵ\chi_{iZ}\simeq 1.6b_{Z}q^{2}/\sqrt{\epsilon}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ 1.6 italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / square-root start_ARG italic_ϵ end_ARG with bZkZ2ρi2subscript𝑏𝑍subscriptsuperscript𝑘2𝑍subscriptsuperscript𝜌2𝑖b_{Z}\equiv k^{2}_{Z}\rho^{2}_{i}italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

The governing equations describing the DAW upper sideband generation due to pump DAW and ZFZS coupling, can be derived from the quasi-neutrality condition and the nonlinear vorticity equation. The governing equations for the DAW lower sideband generation, can be derived similarly. The nonlinear electron response to δϕ+𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ\delta\phi_{+}italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, can be derived from the nonlinear gyrokinetic equation. Noting the k+veω+k_{\parallel+}v_{e}\gg\omega_{+}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≫ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ordering, one has,

δHe+NLickZkθ0B0ω0eTeF0δψ0[δϕZ(1ωetω)0δψZ],similar-to-or-equals𝛿subscriptsuperscript𝐻𝑁𝐿limit-from𝑒𝑖𝑐subscript𝑘𝑍subscript𝑘𝜃0subscript𝐵0subscript𝜔0𝑒subscript𝑇𝑒subscript𝐹0𝛿subscript𝜓0delimited-[]𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑍subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡absent𝑒𝜔0𝛿subscript𝜓𝑍\displaystyle\delta H^{NL}_{e+}\simeq i\frac{ck_{Z}k_{\theta 0}}{B_{0}\omega_{% 0}}\frac{e}{T_{e}}F_{0}\delta\psi_{0}\left[\delta\phi_{Z}-\left(1-\frac{\omega% ^{t}_{*e}}{\omega}\right)_{0}\delta\psi_{Z}\right],italic_δ italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N italic_L end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ italic_i divide start_ARG italic_c italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_e end_ARG start_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] , (13)

with the superscript “NL” denoting nonlinear particle response. The nonlinear ion response to δϕ+𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ\delta\phi_{+}italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, on the other hand, can be derived noting the ωωkvi,ωdformulae-sequencesimilar-to𝜔subscript𝜔much-greater-thansubscript𝑘parallel-tosubscript𝑣𝑖subscript𝜔𝑑\omega\sim\omega_{*}\gg k_{\parallel}v_{i},\omega_{d}italic_ω ∼ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≫ italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ordering, and one obtains

δHi+NLickZkθ0B0ω+J0JZeTF0(ωitω)0δϕ0δϕZ.similar-to-or-equals𝛿subscriptsuperscript𝐻𝑁𝐿limit-from𝑖𝑖𝑐subscript𝑘𝑍subscript𝑘𝜃0subscript𝐵0subscript𝜔subscript𝐽0subscript𝐽𝑍𝑒𝑇subscript𝐹0subscriptsubscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡absent𝑖𝜔0𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ0𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑍\displaystyle\delta H^{NL}_{i+}\simeq-i\frac{ck_{Z}k_{\theta 0}}{B_{0}\omega_{% +}}J_{0}J_{Z}\frac{e}{T}F_{0}\left(\frac{\omega^{t}_{*i}}{\omega}\right)_{0}% \delta\phi_{0}\delta\phi_{Z}.italic_δ italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N italic_L end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ - italic_i divide start_ARG italic_c italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_e end_ARG start_ARG italic_T end_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (14)

Substituting the derived particle responses into the quasi-neutrality condition, one obtains

δψ+𝛿subscript𝜓\displaystyle\delta\psi_{+}italic_δ italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== σ+δϕ+subscript𝜎absent𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ\displaystyle\sigma_{*+}\delta\phi_{+}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (15)
+\displaystyle++ i(c/B0)kZkθ0ω0(1ωe/ω)+δϕ0[σ0(1ωeω)0δψZ\displaystyle\frac{i(c/B_{0})k_{Z}k_{\theta 0}}{\omega_{0}(1-\omega_{*e}/% \omega)_{+}}\delta\phi_{0}\left[-\sigma_{*0}\left(1-\frac{\omega_{*e}}{\omega}% \right)_{0}\delta\psi_{Z}\right.divide start_ARG italic_i ( italic_c / italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 - italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ - italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
+\displaystyle++ (σ0+τF0n0J0JZJ+(ωitω)0)δϕZ].\displaystyle\left.\left(\sigma_{*0}+\tau\left\langle\frac{F_{0}}{n_{0}}J_{0}J% _{Z}J_{+}\left(\frac{\omega^{t}_{*i}}{\omega}\right)_{0}\right\rangle\right)% \delta\phi_{Z}\right].( italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_τ ⟨ divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ ) italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] .

The other equation can be derived from vorticity equation. Substituting the linear ion response to ZFZS and pump DAW into RS, we have

b+[k+2VA2ω+2δψ++1Γ+b+(1ωiω)+δϕ+\displaystyle b_{+}\left[-\frac{k^{2}_{\parallel+}V^{2}_{A}}{\omega^{2}_{+}}% \delta\psi_{+}+\frac{1-\Gamma_{+}}{b_{+}}\left(1-\frac{\omega_{*i}}{\omega}% \right)_{+}\delta\phi_{+}\right.italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ - divide start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_δ italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 1 - roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
\displaystyle-- ηiωiω+b+F0n0J+2(v2vth232)δϕ++Tieb+F0n0J+ωdω+δH+iL]\displaystyle\left.\frac{\eta_{i}\omega_{*i}}{\omega_{+}b_{+}}\left\langle% \frac{F_{0}}{n_{0}}J^{2}_{+}\left(\frac{v^{2}}{v^{2}_{th}}-\frac{3}{2}\right)% \right\rangle\delta\phi_{+}+\frac{T_{i}}{eb_{+}}\left\langle\frac{F_{0}}{n_{0}% }J_{+}\frac{\omega_{d}}{\omega_{+}}\delta H^{L}_{+i}\right\rangle\right]divide start_ARG italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟨ divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ) ⟩ italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_e italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟨ divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_δ italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ ]
similar-to-or-equals\displaystyle\simeq icB0ω+kZkθ0{(bZb0)k02VA2ω02δϕ0δψZ\displaystyle-i\frac{c}{B_{0}\omega_{+}}k_{Z}k_{\theta 0}\left\{-(b_{Z}-b_{0})% \frac{k^{2}_{\parallel 0}V^{2}_{A}}{\omega^{2}_{0}}\delta\phi_{0}\delta\psi_{Z% }\right.- italic_i divide start_ARG italic_c end_ARG start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT { - ( italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) divide start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
+\displaystyle++ [Γ0ΓZ+(J+JZJ0J02)(ωitω)0F0n0]δϕZδϕ0}.\displaystyle\left.\left[\Gamma_{0}-\Gamma_{Z}+\left\langle(J_{+}J_{Z}J_{0}-J^% {2}_{0})\left(\frac{\omega^{t}_{*i}}{\omega}\right)_{0}\frac{F_{0}}{n_{0}}% \right\rangle\right]\delta\phi_{Z}\delta\phi_{0}\right\}.[ roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ⟨ ( italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩ ] italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } .

Substituting equation (15) into (LABEL:eq:sideband_vorticity), one obtains, the equation describing δϕ+𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ\delta\phi_{+}italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT evolution due to δϕ0𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ0\delta\phi_{0}italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and δϕZ𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑍\delta\phi_{Z}italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT coupling

b+ϵA+δϕ+ickZkθ0B0ω+(β+δϕZ+γ+δψZ)δϕ0,similar-to-or-equalssubscript𝑏subscriptitalic-ϵlimit-from𝐴𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑖𝑐subscript𝑘𝑍subscript𝑘𝜃0subscript𝐵0subscript𝜔subscript𝛽𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑍subscript𝛾𝛿subscript𝜓𝑍𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ0\displaystyle b_{+}\epsilon_{A+}\delta\phi_{+}\simeq-i\frac{ck_{Z}k_{\theta 0}% }{B_{0}\omega_{+}}\left(\beta_{+}\delta\phi_{Z}+\gamma_{+}\delta\psi_{Z}\right% )\delta\phi_{0},italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ - italic_i divide start_ARG italic_c italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (17)

with

ϵA+k+2VA2ω+2σ++Tieb+δϕ+F0n0J+ωdω+δH+iL\displaystyle\epsilon_{A+}\equiv-\frac{k^{2}_{\parallel+}V^{2}_{A}}{\omega^{2}% _{+}}\sigma_{*+}+\frac{T_{i}}{eb_{+}\delta\phi_{+}}\left\langle\frac{F_{0}}{n_% {0}}J_{+}\frac{\omega_{d}}{\omega_{+}}\delta H^{L}_{+i}\right\rangleitalic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ - divide start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_e italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟨ divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_δ italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩
+1Γ+b+(1ωiω)++ηiωiω+b+F0n0J+2(v2vth232)1subscriptΓsubscript𝑏subscript1subscript𝜔absent𝑖𝜔subscript𝜂𝑖subscript𝜔absent𝑖subscript𝜔subscript𝑏delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝐹0subscript𝑛0subscriptsuperscript𝐽2superscript𝑣2subscriptsuperscript𝑣2𝑡32\displaystyle+\frac{1-\Gamma_{+}}{b_{+}}\left(1-\frac{\omega_{*i}}{\omega}% \right)_{+}+\frac{\eta_{i}\omega_{*i}}{\omega_{+}b_{+}}\left\langle\frac{F_{0}% }{n_{0}}J^{2}_{+}\left(\frac{v^{2}}{v^{2}_{th}}-\frac{3}{2}\right)\right\rangle+ divide start_ARG 1 - roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟨ divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ) ⟩

being the DAW upper sideband dispersion relation in the WKB limit,

β+subscript𝛽\displaystyle\beta_{+}italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== Γ0ΓZ+(J+JZJ0J02)(ωitω)0F0n0subscriptΓ0subscriptΓ𝑍delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝐽subscript𝐽𝑍subscript𝐽0subscriptsuperscript𝐽20subscriptsubscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡absent𝑖𝜔0subscript𝐹0subscript𝑛0\displaystyle\Gamma_{0}-\Gamma_{Z}+\left\langle(J_{+}J_{Z}J_{0}-J^{2}_{0})% \left(\frac{\omega^{t}_{*i}}{\omega}\right)_{0}\frac{F_{0}}{n_{0}}\right\rangleroman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ⟨ ( italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩
\displaystyle-- k+2VA2b+ω+(ωωe)+(σ0+τJ+J0JZ(ωitω)0F0n0),\displaystyle\frac{k^{2}_{\parallel+}V^{2}_{A}b_{+}}{\omega_{+}(\omega-\omega_% {*e})_{+}}\left(\sigma_{*0}+\tau\left\langle J_{+}J_{0}J_{Z}\left(\frac{\omega% ^{t}_{*i}}{\omega}\right)_{0}\frac{F_{0}}{n_{0}}\right\rangle\right),divide start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω - italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_τ ⟨ italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩ ) ,

and

γ+[k02VA2ω02(bZb0)k02VA2ω+2b+]σ0.\displaystyle\gamma_{+}\equiv-\left[\frac{k^{2}_{\parallel 0}V^{2}_{A}}{\omega% ^{2}_{0}}(b_{Z}-b_{0})-\frac{k^{2}_{\parallel 0}V^{2}_{A}}{\omega^{2}_{+}}b_{+% }\right]\sigma_{*0}.italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ - [ divide start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) - divide start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (18)

Here, the terms proportional to b+subscript𝑏b_{+}italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are from the parallel electric field through equation (15), while the rest are from the generalized gyrokinetic RS and MX.

The lower sideband equation can be derived similarly as

bϵAδϕsubscript𝑏subscriptitalic-ϵlimit-from𝐴𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ\displaystyle b_{-}\epsilon_{A-}\delta\phi_{-}italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== ickZkθ0B0|ω|(βδϕZ+γδψZ)δϕ0,𝑖𝑐subscript𝑘𝑍subscript𝑘𝜃0subscript𝐵0subscript𝜔subscript𝛽𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑍subscript𝛾𝛿subscript𝜓𝑍𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕsuperscript0\displaystyle-i\frac{ck_{Z}k_{\theta 0}}{B_{0}|\omega_{-}|}\left(\beta_{-}% \delta\phi_{Z}+\gamma_{-}\delta\psi_{Z}\right)\delta\phi_{0^{*}},- italic_i divide start_ARG italic_c italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | end_ARG ( italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (19)

with βsubscript𝛽\beta_{-}italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and γsubscript𝛾\gamma_{-}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT defined similarly to β+subscript𝛽\beta_{+}italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and γ+subscript𝛾\gamma_{+}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

IV Modulational dispersion relation for ZFZS generation by DAW

The nonlinear dispersion relation for ZFZS excitation by DAW, can be derived from equations (9), (10), (17) and (19). Noting the major difference between β+subscript𝛽\beta_{+}italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and βsubscript𝛽\beta_{-}italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and γ+subscript𝛾\gamma_{+}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and γsubscript𝛾\gamma_{-}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are multiplied by a k02k^{2}_{\parallel 0}italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT factor, which vanishes for low frequency range where effects associated with plasma nonuniformities could be important, we can safely take γ^γ+=γ^𝛾subscript𝛾subscript𝛾\hat{\gamma}\equiv\gamma_{+}=\gamma_{-}over^ start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG ≡ italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and β^β+=β^𝛽subscript𝛽subscript𝛽\hat{\beta}\equiv\beta_{+}=\beta_{-}over^ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG ≡ italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT from now on. Taking (10)×β^/χiZ+(9))×γ^(\ref{eq:ZF})\times\hat{\beta}/\chi_{iZ}+(\ref{eq:ZC}))\times\hat{\gamma}( ) × over^ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG / italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ( ) ) × over^ start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG, and substituting δϕ±𝛿subscriptitalic-ϕplus-or-minus\delta\phi_{\pm}italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT from equations (17) and (19), one obtains

(cB0kZkθ0)2|δϕ0|2b+[γ^ω0(σ0ω0)(1ϵA+1ϵA+)\displaystyle\left(\frac{c}{B_{0}}k_{Z}k_{\theta 0}\right)^{2}\frac{|\delta% \phi_{0}|^{2}}{b_{+}}\left[\hat{\gamma}\frac{\partial}{\partial\omega_{0}}% \left(\frac{\sigma_{*0}}{\omega_{0}}\right)\left(\frac{1}{\epsilon_{A-}}+\frac% {1}{\epsilon_{A+}}\right)\right.( divide start_ARG italic_c end_ARG start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG | italic_δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG [ over^ start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG divide start_ARG ∂ end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) ( divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) (20)
+\displaystyle++ γ^kZ22ωZ2kr2(σ0ω0)(1ϵA+1ϵA)^𝛾subscriptsuperscript𝑘2𝑍2subscript𝜔𝑍superscript2subscriptsuperscript𝑘2𝑟subscript𝜎absent0subscript𝜔01subscriptitalic-ϵlimit-from𝐴1subscriptitalic-ϵlimit-from𝐴\displaystyle\left.\frac{\hat{\gamma}k^{2}_{Z}}{2\omega_{Z}}\frac{\partial^{2}% }{\partial k^{2}_{r}}\left(\frac{\sigma_{*0}}{\omega_{0}}\right)\left(\frac{1}% {\epsilon_{A+}}-\frac{1}{\epsilon_{A-}}\right)\right.divide start_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) ( divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG )
+\displaystyle++ β^ωZω0χiZ(α+ϵA+αϵA)]=1.\displaystyle\left.\frac{\hat{\beta}}{\omega_{Z}\omega_{0}\chi_{iZ}}\left(% \frac{\alpha_{+}}{\epsilon_{A+}}-\frac{\alpha_{-}}{\epsilon_{A-}}\right)\right% ]=1.divide start_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) ] = 1 .

Equation (20) is the desired modulational dispersion relation for ZFZS generation by DAW, with the effects of system nonuniformity and kinetic effects such as finite orbit width and FLR effects systematically accounted for. It also includes the contribution of beat-driven and spontaneous excitation on the same footing, which is reflected in, e.g., equation (9) for zonal current and equation (10) for zonal flow noting the dependence of “α±subscript𝛼plus-or-minus\alpha_{\pm}italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT” on ωZsubscript𝜔𝑍\omega_{Z}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and kZsubscript𝑘𝑍k_{Z}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Equation (20) is general and needs numerical solution for proper understanding of the ZFZS generation by DAW. It can, however, be analyzed in various limits, by using of the knowledge from previous works.

IV.1 Uniform plasma limit with k02VA2/ω021k^{2}_{\parallel 0}V^{2}_{A}/\omega^{2}_{0}\simeq 1italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ 1

We start from the TAE frequency mode in the uniform plasma (ω=0subscript𝜔0\omega_{*}=0italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0) ideal MHD (σ0=1subscript𝜎absent01\sigma_{*0}=1italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1) limit. Noting |ωZ||ω0|much-less-thansubscript𝜔𝑍subscript𝜔0|\omega_{Z}|\ll|\omega_{0}|| italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | ≪ | italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | and k02VA2ω02k^{2}_{\parallel 0}V^{2}_{A}\simeq\omega^{2}_{0}italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to the leading order, one has α+=αbZ(1k02VA2/ω02)\alpha_{+}=\alpha_{-}\simeq b_{Z}(1-k^{2}_{\parallel 0}V^{2}_{A}/\omega^{2}_{0})italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 - italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), γ^2b0similar-to-or-equals^𝛾2subscript𝑏0\hat{\gamma}\simeq 2b_{0}over^ start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG ≃ 2 italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and β^2b0similar-to-or-equals^𝛽2subscript𝑏0\hat{\beta}\simeq-2b_{0}over^ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG ≃ - 2 italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. We further note ϵA±(ϵA0/ω0)(±ωZ+ΔT)subscriptitalic-ϵlimit-from𝐴plus-or-minussubscriptitalic-ϵ𝐴0subscript𝜔0plus-or-minussubscript𝜔𝑍subscriptΔ𝑇\epsilon_{A\pm}\equiv(\partial\epsilon_{A0}/\partial\omega_{0})(\pm\omega_{Z}+% \Delta_{T})italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ ( ∂ italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ∂ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( ± italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), with ΔT(2ϵA0/kr2)kZ2/(2ϵA0/ω0)subscriptΔ𝑇superscript2subscriptitalic-ϵ𝐴0subscriptsuperscript𝑘2𝑟subscriptsuperscript𝑘2𝑍2subscriptitalic-ϵ𝐴0subscript𝜔0\Delta_{T}\equiv(\partial^{2}\epsilon_{A0}/\partial k^{2}_{r})k^{2}_{Z}/(2% \partial\epsilon_{A0}/\partial\omega_{0})roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ ( ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ∂ italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ( 2 ∂ italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ∂ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) being frequency mismatch and ωZ=iγZsubscript𝜔𝑍𝑖subscript𝛾𝑍\omega_{Z}=i\gamma_{Z}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_i italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with γZsubscript𝛾𝑍\gamma_{Z}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT being the nonlinear growth rate of ZFZS, we then obtain

γZ2=ΔT2subscriptsuperscript𝛾2𝑍subscriptsuperscriptΔ2𝑇\displaystyle\gamma^{2}_{Z}=-\Delta^{2}_{T}italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - roman_Δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT +\displaystyle++ (cB0kZkθ0)22b0|A0|2b+ω0(ϵA0/ω0)superscript𝑐subscript𝐵0subscript𝑘𝑍subscript𝑘𝜃022subscript𝑏0superscriptsubscript𝐴02subscript𝑏subscript𝜔0subscriptitalic-ϵ𝐴0subscript𝜔0\displaystyle\left(\frac{c}{B_{0}}k_{Z}k_{\theta 0}\right)^{2}\frac{2b_{0}|A_{% 0}|^{2}}{b_{+}\omega_{0}(\partial\epsilon_{A0}/\partial\omega_{0})}( divide start_ARG italic_c end_ARG start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 2 italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ∂ italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ∂ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG (21)
×\displaystyle\times× [ΔTω0+4(1k02VA2/ω02)χ^iZ].\displaystyle\left[\frac{\Delta_{T}}{\omega_{0}}+\frac{4(1-k^{2}_{\parallel 0}% V^{2}_{A}/\omega^{2}_{0})}{\hat{\chi}_{iZ}}\right].[ divide start_ARG roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG 4 ( 1 - italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG start_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ] .

Equation (21) recovers the result of Ref. Chen and Zonca (2012), describing ZFZS generation as the nonlinear drive overcomes the threshold due to frequency mismatch, with the two terms in the square brackets representing the contribution from ZC and ZF, respectively. It can be seen that, the contribution of ZF is limited by two factors, i.e., neoclassical shielding (χ^iZχiZ/bZ1.6q2/ϵ1subscript^𝜒𝑖𝑍subscript𝜒𝑖𝑍subscript𝑏𝑍similar-to-or-equals1.6superscript𝑞2italic-ϵmuch-greater-than1\hat{\chi}_{iZ}\equiv\chi_{iZ}/b_{Z}\simeq 1.6q^{2}/\sqrt{\epsilon}\gg 1over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ 1.6 italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / square-root start_ARG italic_ϵ end_ARG ≫ 1) as well as RS & MX cancellation with 1k02VA2/ω02O(ϵ)1-k^{2}_{\parallel 0}V^{2}_{A}/\omega^{2}_{0}\sim O(\epsilon)1 - italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_O ( italic_ϵ ), rendering ZC generation preferred with much lower threshold for modes in the TAE frequency range with ω02k02VA2\omega^{2}_{0}\simeq k^{2}_{\parallel 0}V^{2}_{A}italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT if ΔT/ω0>0subscriptΔ𝑇subscript𝜔00\Delta_{T}/\omega_{0}>0roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0. On the other hand, if ΔT/ω0<0subscriptΔ𝑇subscript𝜔00\Delta_{T}/\omega_{0}<0roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < 0, ZFZS generation is still possible, given the pump TAE is excited in the upper half of the toroidicity induced SAW continuum gap, and the frequency mismatch is small enough. It, however, requires a relatively higher pump TAE amplitude to overcome the threshold due to frequency mismatch. The physics picture is extensively discussed in Ref. Chen and Zonca (2012) on ZFZS excitation by TAE, and interested readers may refer to the original publication for more details.

IV.2 Nonuniform plasma with predominant ZC generation

If we consider the general case with χ^iZ1much-greater-thansubscript^𝜒𝑖𝑍1\hat{\chi}_{iZ}\gg 1over^ start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≫ 1 and ZC generation (proportional to γ^^𝛾\hat{\gamma}over^ start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG in equation (20)) is dominant, the modulational dispersion relation can be written as

γZ2subscriptsuperscript𝛾2𝑍\displaystyle\gamma^{2}_{Z}italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== ΔT2+2(cB0kZkθ0)2γ^|A0|2b+(ϵA0/ω0)subscriptsuperscriptΔ2𝑇2superscript𝑐subscript𝐵0subscript𝑘𝑍subscript𝑘𝜃02^𝛾superscriptsubscript𝐴02subscript𝑏subscriptitalic-ϵ𝐴0subscript𝜔0\displaystyle-\Delta^{2}_{T}+2\left(\frac{c}{B_{0}}k_{Z}k_{\theta 0}\right)^{2% }\frac{\hat{\gamma}|A_{0}|^{2}}{b_{+}(\partial\epsilon_{A0}/\partial\omega_{0})}- roman_Δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 ( divide start_ARG italic_c end_ARG start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG | italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ∂ italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ∂ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG (22)
×\displaystyle\times× [ω0(σ0ω0)ΔT122kr2(σ0ω0)kZ2].delimited-[]subscript𝜔0subscript𝜎absent0subscript𝜔0subscriptΔ𝑇12superscript2subscriptsuperscript𝑘2𝑟subscript𝜎absent0subscript𝜔0subscriptsuperscript𝑘2𝑍\displaystyle\left[\frac{\partial}{\partial\omega_{0}}\left(\frac{\sigma_{*0}}% {\omega_{0}}\right)\Delta_{T}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial k^{2}_{r% }}\left(\frac{\sigma_{*0}}{\omega_{0}}\right)k^{2}_{Z}\right].[ divide start_ARG ∂ end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG divide start_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] .

Noting the expression of ϵAsubscriptitalic-ϵ𝐴\epsilon_{A}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, one has,

2kr2(σ0ω0)superscript2subscriptsuperscript𝑘2𝑟subscript𝜎absent0subscript𝜔0\displaystyle\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial k^{2}_{r}}\left(\frac{\sigma_{*0}}{% \omega_{0}}\right)divide start_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) similar-to-or-equals\displaystyle\simeq ω0k02VA22ϵA0kr2,\displaystyle-\frac{\omega_{0}}{k^{2}_{\parallel 0}V^{2}_{A}}\frac{\partial^{2% }\epsilon_{A0}}{\partial k^{2}_{r}},- divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ,
ω0(σ0ω0)subscript𝜔0subscript𝜎absent0subscript𝜔0\displaystyle\frac{\partial}{\partial\omega_{0}}\left(\frac{\sigma_{*0}}{% \omega_{0}}\right)divide start_ARG ∂ end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) similar-to-or-equals\displaystyle\simeq σ0ω02ω0k02VA2ϵA0ω0.\displaystyle\frac{\sigma_{*0}}{\omega^{2}_{0}}-\frac{\omega_{0}}{k^{2}_{% \parallel 0}V^{2}_{A}}\frac{\partial\epsilon_{A0}}{\partial\omega_{0}}.divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG ∂ italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG .

On the other hand, γ^2b0σ0similar-to-or-equals^𝛾2subscript𝑏0subscript𝜎absent0\hat{\gamma}\simeq 2b_{0}\sigma_{*0}over^ start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG ≃ 2 italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and we have

γZ2=ΔT2subscriptsuperscript𝛾2𝑍subscriptsuperscriptΔ2𝑇\displaystyle\gamma^{2}_{Z}=-\Delta^{2}_{T}italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - roman_Δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT +\displaystyle++ 4(cB0kZkθ0)2b0b+ΔTσ02|A0|2ω02(ϵA0/ω0),4superscript𝑐subscript𝐵0subscript𝑘𝑍subscript𝑘𝜃02subscript𝑏0subscript𝑏subscriptΔ𝑇subscriptsuperscript𝜎2absent0superscriptsubscript𝐴02subscriptsuperscript𝜔20subscriptitalic-ϵ𝐴0subscript𝜔0\displaystyle 4\left(\frac{c}{B_{0}}k_{Z}k_{\theta 0}\right)^{2}\frac{b_{0}}{b% _{+}}\frac{\Delta_{T}\sigma^{2}_{*0}|A_{0}|^{2}}{\omega^{2}_{0}(\partial% \epsilon_{A0}/\partial\omega_{0})},4 ( divide start_ARG italic_c end_ARG start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ∂ italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ∂ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG , (23)

i.e., compared to the uniform plasma case (neglecting contribution of ωsubscript𝜔\omega_{*}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) with predominant ZC generation, the nonlinear drive is quantitatively enhanced by σ02subscriptsuperscript𝜎2absent0\sigma^{2}_{*0}italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, while the qualitative picture is not altered.

IV.3 ZF generation by DAW with k02VA2ω02k^{2}_{\parallel 0}V^{2}_{A}\ll\omega^{2}_{0}italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

An important parameter regime for plasma nonuniformity to play crucial role to SAW instability is the low frequency range with mode frequency comparable to the diamagnetic and/or ion transit frequency range Zonca et al. (1996); Chen and Zonca (2017); Ma et al. (2022), where the modes are characterized by ω02k02VA2\omega^{2}_{0}\gg k^{2}_{\parallel 0}V^{2}_{A}italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≫ italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. It is shown for the BAE case that, ZF generation dominates due to vanishing k2VA2/ω2subscriptsuperscript𝑘2parallel-tosubscriptsuperscript𝑉2𝐴superscript𝜔2k^{2}_{\parallel}V^{2}_{A}/\omega^{2}italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT such that the pure SAW state is broken due to RS dominance over MX Qiu et al. (2016a). To analyze this parameter regime, we take k0=0k_{\parallel 0}=0italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 limit in equation (20) and focus on the effects associated with plasma nonuniformity. In this parameter regime, we have γ^=0^𝛾0\hat{\gamma}=0over^ start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG = 0,

β±subscript𝛽plus-or-minus\displaystyle\beta_{\pm}italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== Γ0ΓZ+F0n0(J±J0JZJ02)(ωitω)0,subscriptΓ0subscriptΓ𝑍delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝐹0subscript𝑛0subscript𝐽plus-or-minussubscript𝐽0subscript𝐽𝑍subscriptsuperscript𝐽20subscriptsubscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡absent𝑖𝜔0\displaystyle\Gamma_{0}-\Gamma_{Z}+\left\langle\frac{F_{0}}{n_{0}}\left(J_{\pm% }J_{0}J_{Z}-J^{2}_{0}\right)\left(\frac{\omega^{t}_{*i}}{\omega}\right)_{0}% \right\rangle,roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ⟨ divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ , (24)
α±subscript𝛼plus-or-minus\displaystyle\alpha_{\pm}italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== (JZJ0J±J±2)F0n0(1ωitω)±delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝐽𝑍subscript𝐽0subscript𝐽plus-or-minussubscriptsuperscript𝐽2plus-or-minussubscript𝐹0subscript𝑛0subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡absent𝑖𝜔plus-or-minus\displaystyle\left\langle\left(J_{Z}J_{0}J_{\pm}-J^{2}_{\pm}\right)\frac{F_{0}% }{n_{0}}\left(1-\frac{\omega^{t}_{*i}}{\omega}\right)_{\pm}\right\rangle⟨ ( italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ (25)
(JZJ0J±J02)F0n0(1ωitω)0,delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝐽𝑍subscript𝐽0subscript𝐽plus-or-minussubscriptsuperscript𝐽20subscript𝐹0subscript𝑛0subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡absent𝑖𝜔0\displaystyle-\left\langle\left(J_{Z}J_{0}J_{\pm}-J^{2}_{0}\right)\frac{F_{0}}% {n_{0}}\left(1-\frac{\omega^{t}_{*i}}{\omega}\right)_{0}\right\rangle,- ⟨ ( italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ ,

the modulational dispersion relation, equation (20), then becomes:

(cB0kZkθ0)|A0|2β^b+ωZω0χiZ[α+ϵA+αϵA]=1.𝑐subscript𝐵0subscript𝑘𝑍subscript𝑘𝜃0superscriptsubscript𝐴02^𝛽subscript𝑏subscript𝜔𝑍subscript𝜔0subscript𝜒𝑖𝑍delimited-[]subscript𝛼subscriptitalic-ϵlimit-from𝐴subscript𝛼subscriptitalic-ϵlimit-from𝐴1\displaystyle\left(\frac{c}{B_{0}}k_{Z}k_{\theta 0}\right)\frac{|A_{0}|^{2}% \hat{\beta}}{b_{+}\omega_{Z}\omega_{0}\chi_{iZ}}\left[\frac{\alpha_{+}}{% \epsilon_{A+}}-\frac{\alpha_{-}}{\epsilon_{A-}}\right]=1.( divide start_ARG italic_c end_ARG start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) divide start_ARG | italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG [ divide start_ARG italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ] = 1 . (26)

Noting again, ϵ±=(ϵA0/ω0)(±ωZ+Δ)subscriptitalic-ϵplus-or-minussubscriptitalic-ϵ𝐴0subscript𝜔0plus-or-minussubscript𝜔𝑍Δ\epsilon_{\pm}=(\partial\epsilon_{A0}/\partial\omega_{0})(\pm\omega_{Z}+\Delta)italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( ∂ italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ∂ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( ± italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Δ ), and

α++αsubscript𝛼subscript𝛼\displaystyle\alpha_{+}+\alpha_{-}italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT similar-to-or-equals\displaystyle\simeq 2ωZω0(JZJ0JZJ+2)F0n0ωi0tω0,2subscript𝜔𝑍subscript𝜔0delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝐽𝑍subscript𝐽0subscript𝐽𝑍subscriptsuperscript𝐽2subscript𝐹0subscript𝑛0subscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡absent𝑖0subscript𝜔0\displaystyle\frac{2\omega_{Z}}{\omega_{0}}\left\langle\left(J_{Z}J_{0}J_{Z}-J% ^{2}_{+}\right)\frac{F_{0}}{n_{0}}\frac{\omega^{t}_{*i0}}{\omega_{0}}\right\rangle,divide start_ARG 2 italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟨ ( italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩ , (27)
α+αsubscript𝛼subscript𝛼\displaystyle\alpha_{+}-\alpha_{-}italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT similar-to-or-equals\displaystyle\simeq 2(J+2J02)F0n0(1ωitω)0,2delimited-⟨⟩subscriptsuperscript𝐽2subscriptsuperscript𝐽20subscript𝐹0subscript𝑛0subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡absent𝑖𝜔0\displaystyle-2\left\langle\left(J^{2}_{+}-J^{2}_{0}\right)\frac{F_{0}}{n_{0}}% \left(1-\frac{\omega^{t}_{*i}}{\omega}\right)_{0}\right\rangle,- 2 ⟨ ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ , (28)

we then have

γZ2subscriptsuperscript𝛾2𝑍\displaystyle\gamma^{2}_{Z}italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== Δ2+(cB0kZkθ)2|A0|2β^b+ω0χiZ2ϵA0/ω0superscriptΔ2superscript𝑐subscript𝐵0subscript𝑘𝑍subscript𝑘𝜃2superscriptsubscript𝐴02^𝛽subscript𝑏subscript𝜔0subscript𝜒𝑖𝑍2subscriptitalic-ϵ𝐴0subscript𝜔0\displaystyle-\Delta^{2}+\left(\frac{c}{B_{0}}k_{Z}k_{\theta}\right)^{2}\frac{% |A_{0}|^{2}\hat{\beta}}{b_{+}\omega_{0}\chi_{iZ}}\frac{2}{\partial\epsilon_{A0% }/\partial\omega_{0}}- roman_Δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( divide start_ARG italic_c end_ARG start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG | italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ∂ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG (29)
×\displaystyle\times× [iΔTγZ(J+JZJ0J+2)(ωitω)0F0n0\displaystyle\left[-i\frac{\Delta_{T}}{\gamma_{Z}}\left\langle(J_{+}J_{Z}J_{0}% -J^{2}_{+})\left(\frac{\omega^{t}_{*i}}{\omega}\right)_{0}\frac{F_{0}}{n_{0}}% \right\rangle\right.[ - italic_i divide start_ARG roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟨ ( italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩
+(J+2J02)(1ωitω)0F0n0].\displaystyle\left.+\left\langle(J^{2}_{+}-J^{2}_{0})\left(1-\frac{\omega^{t}_% {*i}}{\omega}\right)_{0}\frac{F_{0}}{n_{0}}\right\rangle\right].+ ⟨ ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩ ] .
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 1: Dependence of ZFZS growth rate on parameters A𝐴Aitalic_A and B𝐵Bitalic_B. Here, the maximum value of the real part of γZsubscript𝛾𝑍\gamma_{Z}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is plotted. In Fig. 1b, the region in black corresponds to ZFZS marginally stable, while the region in white correspond to ZFZS unstable. The boundary between the white and back regions is determined by B2/4=A3/27superscript𝐵24superscript𝐴327B^{2}/4=A^{3}/27italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 4 = italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 27.

Equation (29) is derived in the k0=0k_{\parallel 0}=0italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 limit, with the two terms in the square bracket corresponding to ZF generation by DAW self-beating and radial envelope modulation, and can be used for studying the condition for ZF generation by KBM. 111It is noteworthy that, the KBM dispersion relation and polarization can be sensitive to plasma parameters including ωsubscript𝜔\omega_{*}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and η=Ln/LT𝜂subscript𝐿𝑛subscript𝐿𝑇\eta=L_{n}/L_{T}italic_η = italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. KBMs may have finite ksubscript𝑘parallel-tok_{\parallel}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in certain parameter regimes, as carefully investigated in Ref. 30. In this sense, the investigation here can be more straightforwardly applied to BAEs. However, in this work we will still take the |kVA/ω|1much-less-thansubscript𝑘parallel-tosubscript𝑉𝐴𝜔1|k_{\parallel}V_{A}/\omega|\ll 1| italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_ω | ≪ 1 limit for KBM, while leaving the more detailed analysis for a separate publication. It is worth noting that, in the uniform plasma limit, it will recover the results of ZF excitation by BAE Qiu et al. (2016a). Equation (29) can be re-written as

γZ3+AγZ+iB=0,subscriptsuperscript𝛾3𝑍𝐴subscript𝛾𝑍𝑖𝐵0\displaystyle\gamma^{3}_{Z}+A\gamma_{Z}+iB=0,italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_A italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_i italic_B = 0 , (30)

with the coefficients given by

A𝐴\displaystyle Aitalic_A \displaystyle\equiv Δ2(cB0kZkθ)2|A0|2β^b+ω0χiZ2ϵA0/ω0superscriptΔ2superscript𝑐subscript𝐵0subscript𝑘𝑍subscript𝑘𝜃2superscriptsubscript𝐴02^𝛽subscript𝑏subscript𝜔0subscript𝜒𝑖𝑍2subscriptitalic-ϵ𝐴0subscript𝜔0\displaystyle\Delta^{2}-\left(\frac{c}{B_{0}}k_{Z}k_{\theta}\right)^{2}\frac{|% A_{0}|^{2}\hat{\beta}}{b_{+}\omega_{0}\chi_{iZ}}\frac{2}{\partial\epsilon_{A0}% /\partial\omega_{0}}roman_Δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( divide start_ARG italic_c end_ARG start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG | italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ∂ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG
×(J+2J02)(1ωitω)0F0n0,absentdelimited-⟨⟩subscriptsuperscript𝐽2subscriptsuperscript𝐽20subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡absent𝑖𝜔0subscript𝐹0subscript𝑛0\displaystyle\hskip 20.00003pt\times\left\langle(J^{2}_{+}-J^{2}_{0})\left(1-% \frac{\omega^{t}_{*i}}{\omega}\right)_{0}\frac{F_{0}}{n_{0}}\right\rangle,× ⟨ ( italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩ ,
B𝐵\displaystyle Bitalic_B \displaystyle\equiv (cB0kZkθ)2|A0|2β^b+ω0χiZ2ϵA0/ω0superscript𝑐subscript𝐵0subscript𝑘𝑍subscript𝑘𝜃2superscriptsubscript𝐴02^𝛽subscript𝑏subscript𝜔0subscript𝜒𝑖𝑍2subscriptitalic-ϵ𝐴0subscript𝜔0\displaystyle\left(\frac{c}{B_{0}}k_{Z}k_{\theta}\right)^{2}\frac{|A_{0}|^{2}% \hat{\beta}}{b_{+}\omega_{0}\chi_{iZ}}\frac{2}{\partial\epsilon_{A0}/\partial% \omega_{0}}( divide start_ARG italic_c end_ARG start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG | italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_β end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ∂ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG
×(J+JZJ0J+2)(ωitω)0F0n0.absentdelimited-⟨⟩subscript𝐽subscript𝐽𝑍subscript𝐽0subscriptsuperscript𝐽2subscriptsubscriptsuperscript𝜔𝑡absent𝑖𝜔0subscript𝐹0subscript𝑛0\displaystyle\times\left\langle(J_{+}J_{Z}J_{0}-J^{2}_{+})\left(\frac{\omega^{% t}_{*i}}{\omega}\right)_{0}\frac{F_{0}}{n_{0}}\right\rangle.× ⟨ ( italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( divide start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ⟩ .

The conditions for ZF excitation by KBM, can thus be derived, by noting the expression of the pump KBM dispersion relation ϵA0subscriptitalic-ϵ𝐴0\epsilon_{A0}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. For the special case with B=0𝐵0B=0italic_B = 0, it is straightforward to see that ZF can be driven unstable, as the nonlinear drive overcomes the threshold due to frequency mismatch. From the general case with B0𝐵0B\neq 0italic_B ≠ 0, the condition for equation (30) to have a root with positive real part, can be determined from the properties of cubic equations with one variable. We, however, will only illustrate briefly the results from numerical solution of equation (30) in Fig. 1. In Fig. 1(a), the dependence of the real part of γZsubscript𝛾𝑍\gamma_{Z}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with the biggest real part on parameters A𝐴Aitalic_A and B𝐵Bitalic_B is given, and the regions for ZFZS exponentially growing is shown by the white region of Fig. 1(b), while the black region corresponds to ZFZS marginally stable with Re(γZ)=0Resubscript𝛾𝑍0\mbox{Re}(\gamma_{Z})=0Re ( italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = 0. It is worth noting that, the boundary separating the white and black regions, is given by B2/4=A3/27superscript𝐵24superscript𝐴327B^{2}/4=A^{3}/27italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 4 = italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 27, from the properties of cubic equations. The detailed analysis, however, will need more careful investigation with realistic plasma parameters and global KBM dispersion relation, and is, beyond the scope of the present work to formulate the general dispersion relation for ZFZS generation by DAW. The detailed analysis of ZFZS generation by KBM, of particular interest for turbulence transport in reactor scale tokamaks with plasma to magnetic pressure ratio significantly higher than present day machines, will be reported in a future publication.

V Summary and Discussion

In this work, general equations for zero frequency zonal structure (ZFZS) nonlinear excitation by drift Alfvén waves (DAWs) are derived, with contribution of plasma nonuniformity and kinetic effects accounted for on the same footing. It is found that, the finite coupling between DAWs to effectively generate ZFZS, may from the radial modulation as the DAWs having different radial wavenumber, and self-beating where no difference of radial wavenumber is required, corresponding to spontaneous excitation and beat-driven Chen et al. (2024), respectively. This can be clearly seen from equation (9) for zonal current (ZC) generation, and equation (29) for zonal flow generation.

The obtained nonlinear dispersion relation can, thus, be applied to study ZFZS generation by DAWs covering a broad frequency range. In the first application, it is shown that the general dispersion relation can recover that of ZFZS excitation by TAE as effects associated with ωsubscript𝜔\omega_{*}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is neglected Chen and Zonca (2012). For the modes in the TAE frequency range and ZC generation dominant, it is shown that, plasma nonuniformity will quantitatively modify the ZFZS generation process, while the qualitative picture is not changed. For DAWs in the KBM frequency range with frequency comparable to diamagnetic frequency, where effect of plasma nonuniformity is expected to be crucial, it is found that, the contribution of self-beating and radial envelope modulation renders the final nonlinear dispersion relation into a cubic equation of ZF growth rate, which will yield parameter regions for ZF excitation and marginally stable. The detailed analysis with realistic KBM dispersion relation, however, is beyond the scope of the present work to formulate the general dispersion relation for ZFZS generation by DAW instabilities, and will be reported in a future publication.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences under Grant No. XDB0790000, the National Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 12275236 and 12261131622, and Italian Ministry for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Project under Grant No. CN23GR02. The authors acknowledge Dr. Fulvio Zonca (CNPS-ENEA and ZJU) for fruitful discussions.

References

  • Alfvén (1942) H. Alfvén, Nature 150, 405 (1942).
  • Fasoli et al. (2007) A. Fasoli, C. Gormenzano, H. Berk, B. Breizman, S. Briguglio, D. Darrow, N. Gorelenkov, W. Heidbrink, A. Jaun, S. Konovalov, et al., Nuclear Fusion 47, S264 (2007).
  • Chen and Zonca (2016) L. Chen and F. Zonca, Review of Modern Physics 88, 015008 (2016).
  • Hasegawa et al. (1979) A. Hasegawa, C. G. Maclennan, and Y. Kodama, Physics of Fluids 22, 2122 (1979).
  • Lin et al. (1998) Z. Lin, T. S. Hahm, W. W. Lee, W. M. Tang, and R. B. White, Science 281, 1835 (1998).
  • Chen et al. (2000) L. Chen, Z. Lin, and R. White, Physics of Plasmas 7, 3129 (2000).
  • Rosenbluth and Hinton (1998) M. N. Rosenbluth and F. L. Hinton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 724 (1998).
  • Diamond et al. (2005) P. H. Diamond, S.-I. Itoh, K. Itoh, and T. S. Hahm, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 47, R35 (2005).
  • Chen and Zonca (2012) L. Chen and F. Zonca, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 145002 (2012).
  • Qiu et al. (2023) Z. Qiu, L. Chen, and Z. Fulvio, Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics 7 (2023).
  • Chen et al. (2001) L. Chen, Z. Lin, R. B. White, and F. Zonca, Nuclear fusion 41, 747 (2001).
  • Qiu et al. (2016a) Z. Qiu, L. Chen, and F. Zonca, Nuclear Fusion 56, 106013 (2016a).
  • Qiu et al. (2016b) Z. Qiu, L. Chen, and F. Zonca, Physics of Plasmas (1994-present) 23, 090702 (2016b).
  • Todo et al. (2010) Y. Todo, H. Berk, and B. Breizman, Nuclear Fusion 50, 084016 (2010).
  • Biancalani et al. (2021) A. Biancalani, A. Bottino, A. D. Siena, O. Gurcan, T. Hayward-Schneider, F. Jenko, P. Lauber, A. Mishchenko, P. Morel, I. Novikau, et al., Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 63, 065009 (2021).
  • Cheng et al. (2017) J. Cheng, W. Zhang, Z. Lin, D. Li, C. Dong, and J. Cao, Physics of Plasmas 24, 092516 (2017).
  • Dong et al. (2019) G. Dong, J. Bao, A. Bhattacharjee, and Z. Lin, Physics of Plasmas 26 (2019).
  • Chen et al. (2018) Y. Chen, G. Y. Fu, C. Collins, S. Taimourzadeh, and S. E. Parker, Physics of Plasmas 25, 032304 (2018).
  • Cheng et al. (1985) C. Cheng, L. Chen, and M. Chance, Ann. Phys. 161, 21 (1985).
  • Heidbrink et al. (2007) W. W. Heidbrink, N. N. Gorelenkov, Y. Luo, M. A. Van Zeeland, R. B. White, M. E. Austin, K. H. Burrell, G. J. Kramer, M. A. Makowski, G. R. McKee, et al. (the DIII-D team), Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 245002 (2007).
  • Qiu et al. (2017) Z. Qiu, L. Chen, and F. Zonca, Nuclear Fusion 57, 056017 (2017).
  • Chen et al. (2023) L. Chen, Z. Qiu, F. Zonca, P. Liu, and R. Ma (Hangzhou, Italy, 2023).
  • Fang et al. (2024) Q. Fang, G. Wei, N. Chen, L. Chen, F. Zonca, and Z. Qiu, Nonlinear interaction between drift wave and toroidal alfvén eigenmode mediated by zonal structures (2024).
  • Chen et al. (2024) L. Chen, Z. Qiu, and F. Zonca, Physics of Plasmas 31, 040701 (2024).
  • Heidbrink et al. (1993) W. Heidbrink, E. Strait, M. Chu, and A. Turnbull, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 855 (1993).
  • Zonca et al. (1996) F. Zonca, L. Chen, and R. A. Santoro, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 38, 2011 (1996).
  • Zhang and Lin (2013) H. Zhang and Z. Lin, Plasma Science and Technology 15, 969 (2013).
  • Chen and Zonca (2017) L. Chen and F. Zonca, Physics of Plasmas 24, 072511 (2017).
  • Heidbrink et al. (2021) W. Heidbrink, M. V. Zeeland, M. Austin, N. Crocker, X. Du, G. McKee, and D. Spong, Nuclear Fusion 61, 066031 (2021).
  • Ma et al. (2022) R. Ma, L. Chen, F. Zonca, Y. Li, and Z. Qiu, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 64, 035019 (2022).
  • Chen et al. (2022a) L. Chen, Z. Qiu, and F. Zonca, Physics of Plasmas 29, 050701 (2022a).
  • Zonca et al. (1999) F. Zonca, L. Chen, J. Q. Dong, and R. A. Santoro, Physics of Plasmas 6, 1917 (1999).
  • Kim et al. (1993) J. Y. Kim, W. Horton, and J. Q. Dong, Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics 5, 4030 (1993).
  • Ishizawa et al. (2019) A. Ishizawa, K. Imadera, Y. Nakamura, and Y. Kishimoto, Physics of Plasmas 26, 082301 (2019).
  • Ren et al. (2022) G. Ren, J. Li, L. Wei, and Z.-X. Wang, Nuclear Fusion 62, 096034 (2022).
  • Frieman and Chen (1982) E. A. Frieman and L. Chen, Physics of Fluids 25, 502 (1982).
  • Chen and Hasegawa (1991) L. Chen and A. Hasegawa, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 96, 1503 (1991), ISSN 2156-2202.
  • Chen et al. (2022b) L. Chen, Z. Qiu, and F. Zonca, Nuclear Fusion 62, 094001 (2022b).