Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Evolution of dissipative regimes in atomically thin Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x superconductor

Sanaz Shokri Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Science Dresden (IFW Dresden), 01069 Dresden, Germany Institute of Applied Physics, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany    Michele Ceccardi University of Genova, Department of Physics, Via Dodecaneso 33, 16146 Genova, Italy CNR-SPIN Institute, Corso Perrone 24, 16152 Genova, Italy    Tommaso Confalone Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Science Dresden (IFW Dresden), 01069 Dresden, Germany Institute of Applied Physics, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany    Christian N. Saggau Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Science Dresden (IFW Dresden), 01069 Dresden, Germany DTU Electro, Department of Electrical and Photonics Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark Center for Silicon Photonics for Optical Communications (SPOC), Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark    Yejin Lee Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, 01187 Dresden, Germany Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Science Dresden (IFW Dresden), 01069 Dresden, Germany    Mickey Martini Swabian Instruments GmbH, Stammheimer Str. 41, 70435 Stuttgart, Germany Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Science Dresden (IFW Dresden), 01069 Dresden, Germany    Genda Gu Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA    Valerii M. Vinokur Terra Quantum AG, 9400 Rorschach, Switzerland    Ilaria Pallecchi CNR-SPIN Institute, Corso Perrone 24, 16152 Genova, Italy    Kornelius Nielsch Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Science Dresden (IFW Dresden), 01069 Dresden, Germany Institute of Applied Physics, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany Institute of Materials Science, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany    Federico Caglieris CNR-SPIN Institute, Corso Perrone 24, 16152 Genova, Italy    Nicola Poccia n.poccia@ifw-dresden.de Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Science Dresden (IFW Dresden), 01069 Dresden, Germany Department of Physics, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cintia, Naples 80126, Italy
Abstract

Thermoelectric transport has been widely used to study Abrikosov vortex dynamics in unconventional superconductors. However, only a few thermoelectric studies have been conducted near the dimensional crossover that occurs when the vortex-vortex interaction length scale becomes comparable to the sample size. Here we report the effects of finite size on the dissipation mechanisms of the Nernst effect in the optimally doped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x high-temperature superconductor, down to the atomic length limit. To access this regime, we develop a new generation of thermoelectric chips based on silicon nitride microprinted circuit boards. These chips ensure optimized signals while preventing sample deterioration. Our results demonstrate that lateral confinement at the nanoscale can effectively reduce vortex dissipation. Investigating vortex dissipation at the micro- and nano-scale is essential for creating stable, miniaturized superconducting circuits.

preprint: APS/123-QED

Introduction

The creation of atomically thin van der Waals (vdW) superconducting Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+xsubscriptBi2subscriptSr2subscriptCaCu2subscriptO8𝑥\text{Bi}_{2}\text{Sr}_{2}\text{CaCu}_{2}\text{O}_{8+x}Bi start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Sr start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT CaCu start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT O start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 8 + italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (BSCCO) layers brought in new possibilities for the investigation of high temperature topological superconductivity [1, 2], superconducting fluctuations at the nanoscale and the exploration of topological defects [3]. The vdW stacking of BSCCO thin crystals offers a unique platform for engineering a new generation of macroscopic quantum devices, ranging from superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors operating at high temperatures [4, 5] to twisted Josephson junctions with a tunable coupling [6, 7, 8]. Formation of intrinsic Josephson junctions between twisted interfaces of BSCCO thin crystals has enabled the observation of spontaneously broken time-reversal symmetry at angles near 45 °times45degree45\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolDegree}start_ARG 45 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG ° end_ARG[6], holding potential for realizing high-coherent superconducting quantum bits [9], chiral Majorana modes [10], and novel twisted symmetries [11].

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Realization of atomically thin BSCCO thermoelectric circuit. (a-f) Overview of the fabrication process in the Ar-filled glovebox: (a) Picking up the free standing NMB by PDMS at -40°C. (b) Baking of the NMB at 120°C to eliminate moisture. (c) Room temperature mechanical exfoliation of BSCCO flake onto a glass substrate. (d) Cryogenic PDMS technique to thin down the flake at -85°C. (e) Positioning of the NMB onto the glass substrate at -50°C. (f) Controlled release of the NMB at -10°C. (g) Schematic view of the NMB cross-section ion at the BSCCO flake, illustrating both the Au underlying contact adjacent with the flake and the Pt heater that is directly in contact with the glass substrate. In the zoom the crystal structure of 4.5nm, which corresponds to 1.5 u.c. of BSCCO is presented. (h-k) Optical images of the step by step fabrication: (h) Initial exfoliated flake onto the glass substrate, underlined by a black dashed line. (i) The flake was thinned down to 1.5 u.c. by cryogenic PDMS technique, preserving the huge lateral dimensions. The red dotted line is determining the new edge of the flake. (j) Optical image in modified colors to show the position of the atomically thin flake below the NMB. (k) overall picture of On-chip thermoelectric device.

Despite these promising developments, experimental investigations of vdW heterostructures are still slow because the current technology for fabricating the vdW circuits remains limited. This occurs mostly due to the challenges of fabricating ultra-thin BSCCO crystals and integrating them into complex electrical circuits. These systems are highly susceptible to degradation from reactions with moisture and oxygen dopant loss [12, 13]. Additional challenges arise due to more subtle issues such as detrimental changes in the ordering of oxygen and this spatial ordering changes interstitials [14, 15] above 73 °times-73degree-73\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolDegree}start_ARG - 73 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG ° end_ARGC and spatial ordering changes of the incommensurate superlattice modulation [16]. To mitigate these issues, noninvasive optical pump-probe approaches have been opted to study the superconductivity in atomically thin BSCCO crystals [17, 18]. Furthermore, in order to realize electrical measurements, stencil mask and low-power thermal evaporation have been employed for the fabrication of few electrical contacts in atomically thin BSCCO nanodevices, without involving chemicals or heating process [2]. The introduction of the cryogenic exfoliation methodology allowing for picking-up and assembly of sensitive van der Waals heterostructures [7, 8, 6], evidenced the potential of this technique for transformative applications [19]. However, the integration of the advanced circuits required to move beyond the stencil mask approach. A fabrication technique relying on the cryogenic dry transfer of printable circuits embedded into silicon nitride membranes has been therefore developed [20, 21].

Ideal applications for this technology are thermoelectric circuits, requiring spatial precision at the micro-/nano-scale and a variety of elements like heaters, thermometers and electrical leads, which are often not compatible with the chemistry of the ultra-thin BSCCO crystals. Besides their natural application in energy harvesting and power generation [22], thermoelectric devices have been proven to be remarkably useful for exploring several condensed matter systems including the inert two-dimensional (2D) materials  [23], topological non-trivial compounds [24], and unconventional superconductors. In particular, the transverse thermoelectric effect and Nernst effect, have been widely employed in the field of unconventional superconductivity to investigate fluctuations, symmetry breaking [25, 26, 27], pseudogap phase [28] and vortex dynamics [29, 30, 31]. Among the high-Tcsubscript𝑇cT_{\text{c}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT superconductors, bulk BSCCO is quite special because being extremely anisotropic [32, 33] and having large Ginzburg number and significant quantum resistance, it exhibits unique vortex transitions [34, 35], which are influenced by thermal and quantum fluctuations, as well as by quenched disorder [36].

Learning how to control the nature of the dissipative regime can improve the performance of atomically thin cuprate superconducting circuits and the Nernst effect is a powerful tool to reach this goal. To that end, we realize silicon nitride microprinted circuit boards to perform thermoelectric measurements on atomically thin BSCCO samples and probe the vortex dynamics and dissipation regimes in presence of the effects of the sample finite sizes.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Transport properties of the microprinted thermoelectric circuit. (a) Current flowing in the heater as a function of time. Inset, displaying the schematics of the metallic pattern underneath the NMB shows the heater, the transverse electric contacts on the flake, and the hot (red) and cold (blue) thermometers on the substrate. (b) The time dependence of the power dissipated into the heater. (c) The local temperature obtained by hot and the cold thermometers as a function of time. (d) Time dependence of the temperature difference between the two thermometers. (e) Transverse thermoelectric voltage at T𝑇Titalic_T=80 K, showing a sign change with an applied out-of-plane magnetic field B𝐵Bitalic_B=±plus-or-minus\pm±5 T.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

To realize the on-chip Nernst experimental setup, we pick up the fabricated SiN microcircuit board at -40°C using a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) stamp and bake it at 120°C to remove water molecules, as schematically shown in Fig. 1a,b. The details of the circuit board fabrication are given in the Supplementary Information (SI). Following this procedure, the BSCCO crystal with optimal doping is mechanically exfoliated onto a glass substrate within an argon-filled glovebox (Fig. 1c) and is then further thinned down at cryogenic temperatures using another PDMS stamp, see Fig. 1d. This step reduces the flake thickness to the atomic level while preserving its lateral dimensions. We successfully decrease the thickness of the flake depicted in Fig. 1h down to 4.5nm, which corresponds to 1.5 u.c., as shown in Fig. 1i, without causing any breaks. This is possible because the glass substrate provides stronger vdW forces with the flake as compared to red forces developing in the silicon substrate used in previous studies [7, 8, 20]. Immediately after that, the nanomembrane (NMB) featuring the metallic contacts underneath are transferred and freely released from the stamp on top of the flake at low temperatures, as depicted in Fig. 1e,f,g. The quick treatment guarantees a pristine interface between the metal contacts and thin BSCCO crystal, thereby preserving its superconducting properties and ensuring an optimal electrical signal [20]. The optical micrograph of the device is shown in Fig. 1j,k. The microcircuit consists of a resistive heater in contact with the substrate, which provides a dissipate power in the close vicinity of one side of the crystal and a set of electrodes measuring the transverse, V𝑉Vitalic_VT, and longitudinal, V𝑉Vitalic_VL, electric voltages.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Size dependent evolution of the Nernst effect. (a) Four-probe resistance of the BSCCO flakes as a function of the temperature. Inset: temperature dependence of the sheet resistance for all the previous devices calculated as ρ/t𝜌𝑡\rho/titalic_ρ / italic_t, where t𝑡titalic_t is the thickness of the crystals. All samples are measured under identical geometric conditions. (b) Temperature dependence of the Nernst effect at B𝐵Bitalic_B = 3 T for BSCCO flakes in (a) with different thicknesses compared with optimally doped bulk adapted from [30]. (c-d) Temperature dependence of (c) the resistance and of (d) the Nernst effect of 40 nm-thick flake under various applied magnetic fields up to 9T. Inset: magnetic field dependence of the Nernst effect at T𝑇Titalic_T = 60 K.

Fig. 2, shows our measured results of the thermoelectric effect. We present the time dependence of VTsubscript𝑉TV_{\rm{T}}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at 80 Ktimes80kelvin80\text{\,}\mathrm{K}start_ARG 80 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_K end_ARG, when switching the heater on and off twice, as depicted in Fig. 2a,b. The two cr/Au stripes, 20μ20𝜇20\mu20 italic_μm apart and 15μ15𝜇15\mu15 italic_μm from the heater, act as hot and cold thermometers (inset of Fig. 2a). The local temperature was inferred by four-probe resistance measurements, after a calibration of its temperature dependence from room to cryogenic temperatures (see the Fig. S3 of the SI for further details). Figure 2c presents the local temperature variation at base temperature of 80 Ktimes80kelvin80\text{\,}\mathrm{K}start_ARG 80 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_K end_ARG as a function of time. When the heater is turned on, the local temperature increases by a few degrees, establishing a temperature difference ΔTΔ𝑇\Delta Troman_Δ italic_T between the two thermometers, as shown in Fig. 2d. The observed ΔTΔ𝑇\Delta Troman_Δ italic_T is consistent with COMSOL simulations reported in the SI. The VTsubscript𝑉TV_{\rm{T}}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT signal in Fig. 2e exhibits a sign change when the external out-of-plane magnetic field of 5 Ttimes5tesla5\text{\,}\mathrm{T}start_ARG 5 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_T end_ARG is reversed, which is consistent with the expected behavior for a transverse signal that is typically an odd function of the magnetic field. This property allows us to antisymmetrize the positive and negative magnetic field data to estimate the Nernst voltage variation ΔVTΔsubscript𝑉T\Delta V_{\rm{T}}roman_Δ italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Similarly, the time dependence of the Seebeck signal is reported in the SI (Fig S2). To calculate the absolute value of the Nernst coefficient Sxysubscript𝑆xyS_{\rm{xy}}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_xy end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for our thermal transport, the thermal gradient generated by the heating current must be quantified once for all the temperatures under study, see SI for further details.

To execute our thermal transport study, we fabricate, in total, three devices for three different BSCCO crystal thicknesses: 4.5,13,40 nm4.513times40nanometer4.5,13,$40\text{\,}\mathrm{nm}$4.5 , 13 , start_ARG 40 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_nm end_ARG. Figure 3a presents the temperature dependence of the four-probe resistance of these devices across the superconducting transition and, in the inset, the sheet resistance is presented. Notably, thinner crystals exhibit higher sheet resistance and sharper superconducting transitions, as reported in Ref. [2]. In Fig. 3b, the temperature dependence of the Nernst effect is reported as a function of the thickness at B=3 T𝐵times3teslaB=$3\text{\,}\mathrm{T}$italic_B = start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_T end_ARG compared to the bulk one (adapted from [30]). In the normal state Sxysubscript𝑆xyS_{\rm{xy}}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_xy end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is small. By decreasing the temperature, a pronounced positive peak below the critical temperature appears, which corresponds to the motion of depinned vortices. Finally, Sxysubscript𝑆xyS_{\rm{xy}}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_xy end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vanishes at the lowest temperatures. The typical signature of mobile superconducting vortices in the mixed state of cuprates [30, 37] is clearly seen in all studied samples.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Vortex distribution depending on the sample dimensions. Experimental evolution of the Nernst coefficient Sxysubscript𝑆xyS_{\rm{xy}}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_xy end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as a function of L𝐿Litalic_L and normalized over 2ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ for different magnetic fields B𝐵Bitalic_B = 5 T and B𝐵Bitalic_B = 3 T. Sxysubscript𝑆xyS_{\rm{xy}}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_xy end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is maximal in correspondence of the collective pinning regime, while it diminishes due to the effect of the finite lateral sizes. The solid black symbols related to the bulk samples  [30] are set as a reference for the limit of very large thickness, specifically their horizontal position is calculated as L2λ𝐿2𝜆\frac{L}{2\lambda}divide start_ARG italic_L end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_λ end_ARG, replacing ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ by λ𝜆\lambdaitalic_λ.

The intensity of the Nernst effect is significantly amplified in flakes as compared to that in the standard bulk samples [30], see also other experimental data in bulk BSCCO [38, 39]. Remarkably, the peak value for the 40 nmtimes40nanometer40\text{\,}\mathrm{nm}start_ARG 40 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_nm end_ARG-thick flake is nearly an order of magnitude greater than the peak in the bulk and twice as much as that of the 4.5 nmtimes4.5nanometer4.5\text{\,}\mathrm{nm}start_ARG 4.5 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_nm end_ARG- and 13 nmtimes13nanometer13\text{\,}\mathrm{nm}start_ARG 13 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_nm end_ARG-thick devices.

Interestingly, Hall effect measurements on atomically thin BSCCO flakes exhibit a sign reversal roughly in the same temperature range and the region of the H𝐻Hitalic_H-T𝑇Titalic_T plane where the Hall voltage is negative and increases its magnitude when flake thickness decreases [2]. As normal excitations inside and outside vortex cores contribute to the Hall effect both below Tcsubscript𝑇cT_{\text{c}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and above Tcsubscript𝑇cT_{\text{c}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in the vortex-like fluctuation regime, the sign reversal indicates flux-flow dominated transport, occurring when the negative contribution from vortex cores dominates over the positive normal state contribution. The thickness dependence is attributed to the smaller mobility of the outermost atomic layers, whose relative contribution increases with decreasing thickness [2]. However, the similarity between Hall and Nernst transverse effects cannot be extended further, as Hall effect reflects the sign of charge carriers, whereas vortex Nernst effect does not.

To achieve more comprehensive understanding of the work of the 40 nmtimes40nanometer40\text{\,}\mathrm{nm}start_ARG 40 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_nm end_ARG-thick device which exhibits the most pronounced Nernst effect, we show in Fig. 3c,d the temperature dependence of both resistance and Nernst effect as a function of magnetic field up to 9 Ttimes9tesla9\text{\,}\mathrm{T}start_ARG 9 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_T end_ARG. Applying the external field broadens the superconducting transition [38], and the magnitude of the Nernst effect in the mixed state increases with field, see inset in Fig. 3d.

The Nernst coefficient Sxysubscript𝑆xyS_{\rm{xy}}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_xy end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=Ey/(xT)subscript𝐸ysubscriptx𝑇E_{\rm y}/(\nabla_{\rm x}T)italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ( ∇ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T ) in the mixed state, where Eysubscript𝐸yE_{\rm y}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the y-component of the electric field that results from the magnetic field’s z-component Bzsubscript𝐵zB_{\rm z}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which is determined by the vortex dissipative motion. Thus, an enhancement of the Nernst signal indicates a growing ratio of driving to pinning forces, reflecting their competition.

Note the challenging trends of changing Sxysubscript𝑆xyS_{\rm{xy}}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_xy end_POSTSUBSCRIPT across the three flakes in our experiment: all the flakes present an enlarged Nernst coefficient with respect to the bulk sample, suggesting a crucial effect of the spacial confinement. However, among the flakes, the 40 nmtimes40nanometer40\text{\,}\mathrm{nm}start_ARG 40 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG roman_nm end_ARG-one, presents the largest S𝑆Sitalic_Sxy, proving that the Nernst coeffcient is not simply scaled by the sample thickness. This evidences the fact that the vortex motion must be also influenced by the lateral confinement, giving born to a complex scenario in which different pinning mechanisms are competing over different lengthscales. It is interesting to remark that our samples are all much thinner than the typical London penetration depth λ𝜆\lambdaitalic_λ of BSCCO, which is about 270 nm [40, 41]. In this regime, the vortex-vortex interaction is mainly mediated by the magnetic stray field and the scale of the screening of the vortex in-plane supercurrents is set by the Pearl length ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ=2λ2superscript𝜆2\lambda^{2}italic_λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT/d𝑑ditalic_d, rather than by λ𝜆\lambdaitalic_λ[42]. In our samples ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ ranges from few to tens of microns, being comparable with the characteristic lateral size of the flakes L𝐿Litalic_L. Note that L𝐿Litalic_L represents the smallest length of the flake. (see Table 1). Thus, we attempt to represent out experimental Nernst data as a function of the ratio L/2Λ𝐿2ΛL/2\Lambdaitalic_L / 2 roman_Λ, which contains different lengtscales (L𝐿Litalic_L, d𝑑ditalic_d and λ𝜆\lambdaitalic_λ), as shown in Fig. 4. However, though a trend is found, the role of ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ is expected to be relevant only at very small fields, when a limited number of vortices are within the interaction range. Therefore other mechanisms, relevant at higher fields, must be considered. In these regards, it is established that the dissipative motion of vortices across the finite-width superconducting strip involves an interplay between defects near the strip’s edges, which stimulate vortex entry and exit [43] [44], and the standard pinning effects of defects nearer to the strip’s center, which are expected to determine vortex motion within the ”depth” of the strip. In this interplay, not only the sample width, but also edge morphology and defect distribution near the edges, play key roles.

Recent reports show a systematic decrease of the Nernst effect with doping in atomically thin samples [3]. The relevance of such effects has been demonstrated for sub-micrometric strips [45]. In our work we present an experimental evidence that the Nernst coefficient Sxysubscript𝑆xyS_{\rm{xy}}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_xy end_POSTSUBSCRIPT increases with the lateral width L𝐿Litalic_L of the atomically thin samples. This observation probably indicates the growing effect of pinning in the central region of the strip (pinning effects decrease near the edges of the strip). The control of the sample-edges geometry becomes therefore an important control knob for reducing the dissipation in possible superconducting circuits [9] and improving photon detectors [4] based on cuprate van der Waals artificial systems. This stresses the need for careful investigations of the details of pinning phenomena, particularly the possible interplay between different pinning regimes and their influence on the Nernst effect in strips of finite lateral width. This study, including the detailed investigation of the effects of collective pinning in the finite-width system and the possible emergence of the long range interactions, decaying as the inverse distance 1/r𝑟ritalic_r between vortices [42] along with a detailed analysis of the behavior of the Nernst coefficient within the framework of pinning theory[36, 45, 46], will be the subject of forthcoming research.

Table 1: Characteristic lengths of the BSCCO flakes under study
d𝑑ditalic_d [nm] L𝐿Litalic_L [μ𝜇\muitalic_μm] ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ [μ𝜇\muitalic_μm] L𝐿Litalic_L/2ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ Sxysubscript𝑆xyS_{\rm{xy}}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_xy end_POSTSUBSCRIPT@3T [μ𝜇\muitalic_μV K-1 ]
4.5 100 32.4 1.54 6.74
13 56 11.2 2.50 5.53
40 155 3.65 22.3 10.44

Experimental section

Device fabrication: The exfoliated flakes were obtained within an Ar-filled glovebox from a bulk single crystal of BSCCO and transferred from the scotch tape on a glass substrate, i.e. quartz monocrystals with various different crystal directions formed via hydrothermal synthesis. The substrate has been both pre-treated with oxygen plasma to optimize the flake adhesion and placed on a hotplate at 150°C for several hours to remove the moisture. The thicknesses of the flakes were estimated, based on the RGB calibration by the optical microscope. Nevertheless, the actual thickness was accurately determined using atomic force microscopy (AFM) after the completion of the transport measurements. To successfully perform the cryogenic thinning described in the main text, the glass substrate was placed on the stage and fixed at –85°C. This temperature, which is low enough to freeze the interlayer O2 dopants, has been chosen based on the dew point of the glovebox, –97°C. Note that the cryogenic PDMS treatment at –85°C was employed to remove thick flakes adjacent to the target flake, for arranging the optimal NMB landing. The precise alignment of the NMB at –50°C with the flake was facilitated by a motorized micro manipulator. After removing the PDMS at –10°C, The device reached room temperature before removing from the glovebox. Finally, the glass substrate was affixed to the chip carrier using silver paste and wire bonded with the automatic BONDTEC 5630i. Transport measurements: The transport measurements were performed in a 9 T Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS). For the resistivity measurements, a standard four-probe method was applied using external SR830 lock-in amplifiers. For the on-chip Nernst effect measurements, we evaluated both the transverse thermoelectric voltage, ΔVTΔsubscript𝑉T\Delta V_{\rm T}roman_Δ italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and the temperature difference across the flake, ΔTΔ𝑇\Delta Troman_Δ italic_T. First, ΔVTΔsubscript𝑉T\Delta V_{\rm{T}}roman_Δ italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT was obtained for all the temperatures under study, following the procedure described in the main text, see Fig. 1, and performing an antisymmetrization of two curves at positive and negative magnetic fields. Then, the calibration of the temperature gradient from room to low temperature was done once with the particular patterned NMB reported in Fig. 2. A calibration of the four probe resistance of the hot and cold thermometers was done to evaluate the local temperature by four-probe resistance measurements, see Fig. 2f,g. All thermoelectric measurements were performed using an external current source KEYTHLEY 4200 and nanovoltmeters KEYTHLEY 2182A. All the samples were measured with identical NMBs.

Acknowledgments– The work is partially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG 512734967, DFG 492704387, and DFG 460444718), co-funded by the European Union (ERC-CoG, 3DCuT, 101124606). The work of V.M.V. was supported by Terra Quantum AG. The work at BNL was supported by the US Department of Energy, office of Basic Energy Sciences, contract no. DOE-sc0012704. The authors are grateful for technical support to Ronny Engelhart, Christiane Kranz, Ronald Uhlemnann and Nicolas Rodriguez Perez. The authors thank Heiko Reith and Dietmar Berger for the technical support on the COMSOL simulations. The authors are deeply grateful to Francesco Tafuri, Haider Golam, Uri Vool, Luca Chirolli, Valentina Brosco, Domenico Montemurro, and Davide Massarotti for support and illuminating discussions.

Author contributions– N.P. conceived and designed the experiment; S.S, performed the fabrication. C.N.S. and S.S. initiated the nanomembrane fabrication. S.S. and M.C. performed the measurements and analyzed the data with the contribution of F.C. and I.P. The cuprate crystals were provided by G.G. The fabrication procedure were discussed by S.S., M.C., T.C., M.M., Y.L., K.N., N. P., and the results were discussed by F.C., I.P., K.N., N.P., V.M.V. The manuscript was written by S.S., M.C., M.M., V.M.V., I.P., K.N., F.C., N.P. All authors discussed the manuscript.

Competing interests– The authors declare no financial or non-financial competing interests.

References

  • [1] Y. Yu, L. Ma, P. Cai, R. Zhong, C. Ye, J. Shen, G. D. Gu, X. H. Chen, Y. Zhang, Nature 2019, 575, 156-163.
  • [2] S. F. Zhao, N. Poccia, M. G. Panetta, C. Yu, J. W. Johnson, H. Yoo, R. Zhong, G. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. V. Postolova, V. M. Vinokur, P. Kim, Phy. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 247001.
  • [3] S. Hu, J. Qiao, G. Gu, Q.-K. Xue, D. Zhang, Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 4818.
  • [4] I. Charaev, D. Bandurin, A. Bollinger, I. Phinney, I. Drozdov, M. Colangelo, B. Butters, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, X. He, et al., Nat. Nanotechnology 2023, 18, 343-349.
  • [5] R. L. Merino, P. Seifert, J. D. Retamal, R. K. Mech, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, K. Kadowaki, R. H. Hadfield, D. K. Efetov, 2D Mater. 2023, 10, 021001.
  • [6] S. F. Zhao, X. Cui, P. A. Volkov, H. Yoo, S. Lee, J. A. Gardener, A. J. Akey, R. Engelke, Y. Ronen, R. Zhong, et al., Science 2023, 382, 1422-1427.
  • [7] Y. Lee, M. Martini, T. Confalone, S. Shokri, C. N. Saggau, D. Wolf, G. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Montemurro, et al., Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2209135.
  • [8] M. Martini, Y. Lee, T. Confalone, S. Shokri, C. N. Saggau, D. Wolf, G. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Montemurro, et al., Mater. Today 2023, 67, 106-112.
  • [9] V. Brosco, G. Serpico, V. Vinokur, N. Poccia, U. Vool, Phy. Rev. Lett. 2024, 132, 017003.
  • [10] G. Margalit, B. Yan, M. Franz, Y. Oreg, Phy. Rev. B 2022, 106, 205424.
  • [11] T. Tummuru, É. Lantagne-Hurtubise, M. Franz, Phy. Rev. B 2022, 106, 014520.
  • [12] L. Sandilands, J. Shen, G. Chugunov, S. Zhao, S. Ono, Y. Ando, K. Burch, Phy. Rev. B 2010, 82, 064503.
  • [13] Y. Huang, L. Zhang, X. Zhou, L. Liao, F. Jin, X. Han, T. Dong, S. Xu, L. Zhao, Y. Dai, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 39489-39496.
  • [14] M. Fratini, N. Poccia, A. Ricci, G. Campi, M. Burghammer, G. Aeppli, A. Bianconi, Nature 2010, 466, 841-844.
  • [15] N. Poccia, M. Fratini, A. Ricci, G. Campi, L. Barba, A. Vittorini-Orgeas, G. Bianconi, G. Aeppli, A. Bianconi, Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 733-736.
  • [16] N. Poccia, S. Y. F. Zhao, H. Yoo, X. Huang, H. Yan, Y. S. Chu, R. Zhong, G. Gu, C. Mazzoli, K. Watanabe, et al., Phy. Rev. Mater. 2020, 4, 114007.
  • [17] Y. Xiao, J. Wu, J. I. Dadap, K. M. Awan, D. Yang, J. Liang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Zonno, M. Bluschke, et al., Nano Lett. 2024, 24, 3986-3993.
  • [18] I. Figueruelo-Campanero, A. del Campo, G. Nieva, E. M. González, A. Serrano, M. Menghini, 2D Mater. 2024, 11, 025032.
  • [19] V. Patil, S. Ghosh, A. Basu, Kuldeep, A. Dutta, K. Agrawal, N. Bhatia, A. Shah, D. A. Jangade, R. Kulkarni, et al., Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 11097.
  • [20] C. N. Saggau, S. Shokri, M. Martini, T. Confalone, Y. Lee, D. Wolf, G. Gu, V. Brosco, D. Montemurro, V. M. Vinokur, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 51558-51564.
  • [21] M. Martini, T. Confalone, Y. Lee, B. Rubrecht, G. Serpico, S. Shokri, C. N. Saggau, D. Montemurro, V. M. Vinokur, A. Isaeva, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 2023, 123, 22517.
  • [22] Q. Zhang, K. Deng, L. Wilkens, H. Reith, K. Nielsch, Nat. Electron. 2022, 5, 333-347.
  • [23] Y. M. Zuev, W. Chang, P. Kim, Phy. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 096807.
  • [24] J. Gooth, A. C. Niemann, T. Meng, A. G. Grushin, K. Landsteiner, B. Gotsmann, F. Menges, M. Schmidt, C. Shekhar, V. Süss, et al., Nature 2017, 547, 324-327.
  • [25] G. Jotzu, G. Meier, A. Cantaluppi, A. Cavalleri, D. Pontiroli, M. Riccò, A. Ardavan, M.-S. Nam, Phys. Rev. X 2023, 13, 021008.
  • [26] A. Pourret, H. Aubin, J. Lesueur, C. Marrache-Kikuchi, L. Berge, L. Dumoulin, K. Behnia, Nat. Phys. 2006, 2, 683.
  • [27] V. Grinenko, D. Weston, F. Caglieris, C. Wuttke, C. Hess, T. Gottschall, I. Maccari, D. Gorbunov, S. Zherlitsyn, J. Wosnitza, et al., Nat. Phys. 2021, 17, 1254.
  • [28] R. Daou, J. Chang, D. LeBoeuf, O. Cyr-Choiniere, F. Laliberté, N. Doiron-Leyraud, B. Ramshaw, R. Liang, D. Bonn, W. Hardy, et al., Nature 2010, 463, 519.
  • [29] Y. Wu, A. Roy, S. Dutta, J. Jesudasan, P. Raychaudhuri, A. Frydman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024, 132, 026003.
  • [30] Y. Wang, L. Li, N. Ong, Phys. Rev. B 2006, 73, 024510.
  • [31] C. W. Rischau, Y. Li, B. Fauqué, H. Inoue, M. Kim, C. Bell, H. Y. Hwang, A. Kapitulnik, K. Behnia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 077001.
  • [32] T. Watanabe, T. Fujii, A. Matsuda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 79, 2113.
  • [33] S. Martin, A. T. Fiory, R. Fleming, L. Schneemeyer, J. V. Waszczak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988, 60, 2194.
  • [34] B. Chen, W. Halperin, P. Guptasarma, D. Hinks, V. Mitrović, A. Reyes, P. Kuhns, “Two-dimensional vortices in superconductors,” Nat. Phys. 2007, 3, 239.
  • [35] A. Mounce, S. Oh, S. Mukhopadhyay, W. Halperin, A. Reyes, P. Kuhns, K. Fujita, M. Ishikado, S. Uchida, Nat. Phys. 2011, 7, 125.
  • [36] G. Blatter, M. V. Feigel’man, V. B. Geshkenbein, A. I. Larkin, V. M. Vinokur, Rev. Mod. Phys. 1994, 66, 1125.
  • [37] K. Behnia, H. Aubin, Rep. Prog. Phys. 2016, 79, 046502.
  • [38] H.-C. Ri, R. Gross, F. Gollnik, A. Beck, R. Huebener, P. Wagner, H. Adrian, Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 3312.
  • [39] R. Li, Z.-S. She, New J. Phys. 2017, 19, 113028.
  • [40] R. Prozorov, R. Giannetta, A. Carrington, P. Fournier, R. Greene, P. Guptasarma, D. Hinks, A. Banks, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 4202.
  • [41] T. Shibauchi, A. Maeda, H. Kitano, T. Honda, K. Uchinokura, Physica C 1992, 203, 315.
  • [42] J. Pearl, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1964, 5, 65.
  • [43] A. Koshelev, V. Vinokur, Phys. Rev. B 2002, 65, 179901.
  • [44] Budinska, B et al., Physical Review Applied 2022, 17, 034072.
  • [45] G. Kimmel, A. Glatz, V. Vinokur, I. Sadovskyy, Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 211.
  • [46] E. H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. B 2009, 79, 134526.