Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
\newaliascnt

thmCtlma \aliascntresetthethmCt \newaliascntcorCtlma \aliascntresetthecorCt \newaliascntprpCtlma \aliascntresettheprpCt \newaliascntdfnCtlma \aliascntresetthedfnCt \newaliascntrmkCtlma \aliascntresetthermkCt \newaliascntexaCtlma \aliascntresettheexaCt \newaliascntqstCtlma \aliascntresettheqstCt \newaliascntpgrCtlma \aliascntresetthepgrCt \newaliascntthmIntroCttheoremintro \aliascntresetthethmIntroCt \newaliascntpbmIntroCttheoremintro \aliascntresetthepbmIntroCt

Lie ideals in properly infinite C*-algebras

Hannes Thiel Hannes Thiel, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg SE-412 96, Sweden. hannes.thiel@chalmers.se www.hannesthiel.org
(Date: 20 December  2024)
Abstract.

We show that every Lie ideal in a unital, properly infinite Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebra is commutator equivalent to a unique two-sided ideal. It follows that the Lie ideal structure of such a Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebra is concisely encoded by its lattice of two-sided ideals. This answers a question of Robert in this setting.

We obtain similar structure results for Lie ideals in unital, real rank zero Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebras without characters. As an application, we show that every Lie ideal in a von Neumann algebra is related to a unique two-sided ideal, which solves a problem of Brešar, Kissin, and Shulman.

Key words and phrases:
Lie ideals, Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebras, properly infinite, von Neumann algebras, commutators, square-zero elements
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 46L05, 46L10. Secondary 16W10, 17B60, 47B47.
The first named author was partially supported by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW 2021.0140).

1. Introduction

A Lie ideal in a Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebra A𝐴Aitalic_A is a linear subspace LA𝐿𝐴L\subseteq Aitalic_L ⊆ italic_A such that for every aA𝑎𝐴a\in Aitalic_a ∈ italic_A and xL𝑥𝐿x\in Litalic_x ∈ italic_L the commutator [a,x]:=axxaassign𝑎𝑥𝑎𝑥𝑥𝑎[a,x]:=ax-xa[ italic_a , italic_x ] := italic_a italic_x - italic_x italic_a belongs to L𝐿Litalic_L. The study of Lie ideals in Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebras has a long history, and we refer to Section 2 in [Mar10] for an overview of available results and directions of active research.

Immediate examples of Lie ideals in a Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebra A𝐴Aitalic_A are all subspaces contained in the center Z(A)𝑍𝐴Z(A)italic_Z ( italic_A ) and all subspaces containing the commutator subspace [A,A]𝐴𝐴[A,A][ italic_A , italic_A ]. If A𝐴Aitalic_A is unital and simple, then this does in fact describes all Lie ideals – a consequence of Herstein’s description of Lie ideals in simple rings [Her55]. Since the center of a unital, simple Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebra A𝐴Aitalic_A contains only scalar multiples of the identity, a subspace L𝐿Litalic_L is a Lie ideal in A𝐴Aitalic_A if and only if L={0}𝐿0L=\{0\}italic_L = { 0 }, L=1𝐿1L={\mathbb{C}}1italic_L = blackboard_C 1, or [A,A]L𝐴𝐴𝐿[A,A]\subseteq L[ italic_A , italic_A ] ⊆ italic_L.

Pop [Pop02] showed that a unital Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebra satisfies A=[A,A]𝐴𝐴𝐴A=[A,A]italic_A = [ italic_A , italic_A ] if and only if A𝐴Aitalic_A has no tracial states. Consequently, a simple, unital Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebra A𝐴Aitalic_A without tracial states has exactly three Lie ideals: {0}0\{0\}{ 0 }, 11{\mathbb{C}}1blackboard_C 1 and A𝐴Aitalic_A. Cuntz and Pedersen [CP79] gave a description of the closure [A,A]¯¯𝐴𝐴\overline{[A,A]}over¯ start_ARG [ italic_A , italic_A ] end_ARG as the intersection of the kernels of all tracial states on A𝐴Aitalic_A. In particular, a simple, unital Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebra A𝐴Aitalic_A with a unique tracial state has exactly four closed Lie ideals: {0}0\{0\}{ 0 }, 11{\mathbb{C}}1blackboard_C 1, [A,A]¯¯𝐴𝐴\overline{[A,A]}over¯ start_ARG [ italic_A , italic_A ] end_ARG and A𝐴Aitalic_A. This was first observed by Marcoux and Murphy [MM98], generalizing the case of UHF-algebras, which was first proved by Marcoux [Mar95].

Ng and Robert [NR16] showed that [A,A]𝐴𝐴[A,A][ italic_A , italic_A ] is closed in every pure, exact Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebra. It follows that a simple, unital, exact, pure Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebra A𝐴Aitalic_A with a unique tracial state has exactly four Lie ideals: {0}0\{0\}{ 0 }, 11{\mathbb{C}}1blackboard_C 1, [A,A]𝐴𝐴[A,A][ italic_A , italic_A ] and A𝐴Aitalic_A. This applies for example to UHF-algebras, to irrational rotation algebras, and to the Jiang-Su algebra (where it was first shown by Ng [Ng12]). It also applies to many, and possibly all, simple, reduced group Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebras. Indeed, if G𝐺Gitalic_G is a countable, exact, acylindrically hyperbolic group with trivial finite radical and with the rapid decay property, then Cred(G)subscriptsuperscript𝐶red𝐺C^{*}_{\mathrm{red}}(G)italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_red end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_G ) has strict comparison [AGEP24], and therefore is pure [APTV24], and has a unique tracial state [BKKO17].

Turning towards Lie ideals in non-simple Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebras, it is clear that the structure of the lattice of two-sided ideals will play a role. A systematic study of the interplay between Lie and two-sided ideals was initiated by Brešar, Kissin, and Shulman [BKS08] We first introduce the necessary notation. Following the usual convention, given subspaces M,NA𝑀𝑁𝐴M,N\subseteq Aitalic_M , italic_N ⊆ italic_A, we use [M,N]𝑀𝑁[M,N][ italic_M , italic_N ] to denote the subspace of A𝐴Aitalic_A generated by the set of commutators [x,y]𝑥𝑦[x,y][ italic_x , italic_y ] for xM𝑥𝑀x\in Mitalic_x ∈ italic_M and yN𝑦𝑁y\in Nitalic_y ∈ italic_N. Further, given a subspace KA𝐾𝐴K\subseteq Aitalic_K ⊆ italic_A, we set

T(K):={aA:[A,a]K}.assign𝑇𝐾conditional-set𝑎𝐴𝐴𝑎𝐾T(K):=\big{\{}a\in A:[A,a]\subseteq K\big{\}}.italic_T ( italic_K ) := { italic_a ∈ italic_A : [ italic_A , italic_a ] ⊆ italic_K } .

This ‘derived subspace’ was first considered by Herstein [Her55], and it is denoted by N(K)𝑁𝐾N(K)italic_N ( italic_K ) in [BKS08].

Given a two-sided ideal IA𝐼𝐴I\subseteq Aitalic_I ⊆ italic_A, Brešar, Kissin, and Shulman observed that a subspace LA𝐿𝐴L\subseteq Aitalic_L ⊆ italic_A is a Lie ideal whenever

[A,I]LT([A,I]).𝐴𝐼𝐿𝑇𝐴𝐼[A,I]\subseteq L\subseteq T([A,I]).[ italic_A , italic_I ] ⊆ italic_L ⊆ italic_T ( [ italic_A , italic_I ] ) .

We say that a Lie ideal L𝐿Litalic_L is embraced by I𝐼Iitalic_I if it satisfies these inclusions. The Lie ideals that are embraced by some two-sided ideal are thought of as ‘unsurprising’. A major question is if there exist any Lie ideals that do not arise this way:

Problem \thepbmIntroCt (Brešar, Kissin, and Shulman [BKS08, p. 74]).

Given a Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebra A𝐴Aitalic_A, is every Lie ideal of A𝐴Aitalic_A embraced by some two-sided ideal of A𝐴Aitalic_A?

To study this problem, two further notions were introduced in [BKS08]: Given a Lie ideal LA𝐿𝐴L\subseteq Aitalic_L ⊆ italic_A and a two-sided ideal IA𝐼𝐴I\subseteq Aitalic_I ⊆ italic_A, we say that L𝐿Litalic_L is commutator equivalent to I𝐼Iitalic_I if

[A,I]=[A,L].𝐴𝐼𝐴𝐿[A,I]=[A,L].[ italic_A , italic_I ] = [ italic_A , italic_L ] .

Further, we say that L𝐿Litalic_L is related to I𝐼Iitalic_I if

[A,I]LT(I).𝐴𝐼𝐿𝑇𝐼[A,I]\subseteq L\subseteq T(I).[ italic_A , italic_I ] ⊆ italic_L ⊆ italic_T ( italic_I ) .

It is easy to see that these constitute a sufficient and a necessary conditions for embracement. Indeed, if L𝐿Litalic_L is commutator equivalent to I𝐼Iitalic_I, then L𝐿Litalic_L is embraced by I𝐼Iitalic_I. Further, if L𝐿Litalic_L is embraced by I𝐼Iitalic_I, then L𝐿Litalic_L is related to I𝐼Iitalic_I.

It was shown in [BKS08, Theorem 5.27] that every Lie ideal L𝐿Litalic_L in a Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebra A𝐴Aitalic_A is topologically commutator equivalent to a two-sided ideal I𝐼Iitalic_I in the sense that [A,L]𝐴𝐿[A,L][ italic_A , italic_L ] and [A,I]𝐴𝐼[A,I][ italic_A , italic_I ] have the same closure. This leads to a description of all closed Lie ideals in terms of closed two-sided ideals. However, this does not show that all closed Lie ideals in a Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebra are commutator equivalent to (let alone embraced by or related to) a two-sided ideal. For general non-closed Lie ideals even less is known, and Section 1 as well as the following stronger problem remain open:

Problem \thepbmIntroCt (Robert [Rob16, Question 1.12]).

Given a Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebra A𝐴Aitalic_A, is every Lie ideal of A𝐴Aitalic_A commutator equivalent to some two-sided ideal of A𝐴Aitalic_A?

The results mentioned at the beginning of the introduction show that every Lie ideal in a unital, simple Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebra A𝐴Aitalic_A is commutator equivalent to a two-sided ideal, which gives positive solutions to Problems 1 and 1 in this setting. Indeed, the only two-sided ideals are {0}0\{0\}{ 0 } and A𝐴Aitalic_A, and a Lie ideal is commutator equivalent to {0}0\{0\}{ 0 } if and only if it is contained in Z(A)𝑍𝐴Z(A)italic_Z ( italic_A ), while a Lie ideal it is commutator equivalent to A𝐴Aitalic_A if and only if it contains [A,A]𝐴𝐴[A,A][ italic_A , italic_A ]. (This uses that [A,A]=[A,[A,A]]𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴[A,A]=[A,[A,A]][ italic_A , italic_A ] = [ italic_A , [ italic_A , italic_A ] ], which follows for example from [GT24, Corollary 3.4].)

In [FMS82], Fong, Miers and Sourour showed that every Lie ideal in the von Neumann algebra of bounded, linear operators on a separable Hilbert space is embraced by a two-sided ideal. This was substantially extended by Brešar, Kissin, and Shulman, who showed in [BKS08, Theorem 5.19] that every Lie ideal in a von Neumann algebra is commutator equivalent to a two-sided ideal, thereby providing positive solutions to Problems 1 and 1 for von Neumann algebras.

Our main result is a positive solution to Section 1 for unital, properly infinite Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebras.

Theorem \thethmIntroCt (5).

Let L𝐿Litalic_L be a Lie ideal in a unital, properly infinite Csuperscript𝐶C^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-algebra A𝐴Aitalic_A. Then L𝐿Litalic_L is commutator equivalent to the two-sided ideal I:=A[A,L]Aassign𝐼𝐴𝐴𝐿𝐴I:=A[A,L]Aitalic_I := italic_A [ italic_A , italic_L ] italic_A, and hence also embraced by I𝐼Iitalic_I, and related to I𝐼Iitalic_I. Further, I𝐼Iitalic_I is the only two-sided ideal of A𝐴Aitalic_A to which L𝐿Litalic_L is related.