-
Evaluating the Robustness of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimators via Realistic Simulations in Nutrition Intervention Trials
Authors:
Haodong Li,
Sonali Rosete,
Jeremy Coyle,
Rachael V. Phillips,
Nima S. Hejazi,
Ivana Malenica,
Benjamin F. Arnold,
Jade Benjamin-Chung,
Andrew Mertens,
John M. Colford Jr,
Mark J. van der Laan,
Alan E. Hubbard
Abstract:
Several recently developed methods have the potential to harness machine learning in the pursuit of target quantities inspired by causal inference, including inverse weighting, doubly robust estimating equations and substitution estimators like targeted maximum likelihood estimation. There are even more recent augmentations of these procedures that can increase robustness, by adding a layer of cro…
▽ More
Several recently developed methods have the potential to harness machine learning in the pursuit of target quantities inspired by causal inference, including inverse weighting, doubly robust estimating equations and substitution estimators like targeted maximum likelihood estimation. There are even more recent augmentations of these procedures that can increase robustness, by adding a layer of cross-validation (cross-validated targeted maximum likelihood estimation and double machine learning, as applied to substitution and estimating equation approaches, respectively). While these methods have been evaluated individually on simulated and experimental data sets, a comprehensive analysis of their performance across ``real-world'' simulations have yet to be conducted.
In this work, we benchmark multiple widely used methods for estimation of the average treatment effect using ten different nutrition intervention studies data. A realistic set of simulations, based on a novel method, highly adaptive lasso, for estimating the data-generating distribution that guarantees a certain level of complexity (undersmoothing) is used to better mimic the complexity of the true data-generating distribution. We have applied this novel method for estimating the data-generating distribution by individual study and to subsequently use these fits to simulate data and estimate treatment effects parameters as well as their standard errors and resulting confidence intervals. Based on the analytic results, a general recommendation is put forth for use of the cross-validated variants of both substitution and estimating equation estimators. We conclude that the additional layer of cross-validation helps in avoiding unintentional over-fitting of nuisance parameter functionals and leads to more robust inferences.
△ Less
Submitted 28 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Targeting Learning: Robust Statistics for Reproducible Research
Authors:
Jeremy R. Coyle,
Nima S. Hejazi,
Ivana Malenica,
Rachael V. Phillips,
Benjamin F. Arnold,
Andrew Mertens,
Jade Benjamin-Chung,
Weixin Cai,
Sonali Dayal,
John M. Colford Jr.,
Alan E. Hubbard,
Mark J. van der Laan
Abstract:
Targeted Learning is a subfield of statistics that unifies advances in causal inference, machine learning and statistical theory to help answer scientifically impactful questions with statistical confidence. Targeted Learning is driven by complex problems in data science and has been implemented in a diversity of real-world scenarios: observational studies with missing treatments and outcomes, per…
▽ More
Targeted Learning is a subfield of statistics that unifies advances in causal inference, machine learning and statistical theory to help answer scientifically impactful questions with statistical confidence. Targeted Learning is driven by complex problems in data science and has been implemented in a diversity of real-world scenarios: observational studies with missing treatments and outcomes, personalized interventions, longitudinal settings with time-varying treatment regimes, survival analysis, adaptive randomized trials, mediation analysis, and networks of connected subjects. In contrast to the (mis)application of restrictive modeling strategies that dominate the current practice of statistics, Targeted Learning establishes a principled standard for statistical estimation and inference (i.e., confidence intervals and p-values). This multiply robust approach is accompanied by a guiding roadmap and a burgeoning software ecosystem, both of which provide guidance on the construction of estimators optimized to best answer the motivating question. The roadmap of Targeted Learning emphasizes tailoring statistical procedures so as to minimize their assumptions, carefully grounding them only in the scientific knowledge available. The end result is a framework that honestly reflects the uncertainty in both the background knowledge and the available data in order to draw reliable conclusions from statistical analyses - ultimately enhancing the reproducibility and rigor of scientific findings.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
A machine learning-based approach for estimating and testing associations with multivariate outcomes
Authors:
David Benkeser,
Andrew Mertens,
Benjamin F. Arnold,
John M. Colford Jr.,
Alan Hubbard,
Aryeh Stein,
N. Lntshotshole Jumbe,
Mark van der Laan
Abstract:
We propose a method for summarizing the strength of association between a set of variables and a multivariate outcome. Classical summary measures are appropriate when linear relationships exist between covariates and outcomes, while our approach provides an alternative that is useful in situations where complex relationships may be present. We utilize ensemble machine learning to detect nonlinear…
▽ More
We propose a method for summarizing the strength of association between a set of variables and a multivariate outcome. Classical summary measures are appropriate when linear relationships exist between covariates and outcomes, while our approach provides an alternative that is useful in situations where complex relationships may be present. We utilize ensemble machine learning to detect nonlinear relationships and covariate interactions and propose a measure of association that captures these relationships. A hypothesis test about the proposed associative measure can be used to test the strong null hypothesis of no association between a set of variables and a multivariate outcome. Simulations demonstrate that this hypothesis test has greater power than existing methods against alternatives where covariates have nonlinear relationships with outcomes. We additionally propose measures of variable importance for groups of variables, which summarize each groups' association with the outcome. We demonstrate our methodology using data from a birth cohort study on childhood health and nutrition in the Philippines.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2018; v1 submitted 13 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
