-
BioSimulators: a central registry of simulation engines and services for recommending specific tools
Authors:
Bilal Shaikh,
Lucian P. Smith,
Dan Vasilescu,
Gnaneswara Marupilla,
Michael Wilson,
Eran Agmon,
Henry Agnew,
Steven S. Andrews,
Azraf Anwar,
Moritz E. Beber,
Frank T. Bergmann,
David Brooks,
Lutz Brusch,
Laurence Calzone,
Kiri Choi,
Joshua Cooper,
John Detloff,
Brian Drawert,
Michel Dumontier,
G. Bard Ermentrout,
James R. Faeder,
Andrew P. Freiburger,
Fabian Fröhlich,
Akira Funahashi,
Alan Garny
, et al. (46 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Computational models have great potential to accelerate bioscience, bioengineering, and medicine. However, it remains challenging to reproduce and reuse simulations, in part, because the numerous formats and methods for simulating various subsystems and scales remain siloed by different software tools. For example, each tool must be executed through a distinct interface. To help investigators find…
▽ More
Computational models have great potential to accelerate bioscience, bioengineering, and medicine. However, it remains challenging to reproduce and reuse simulations, in part, because the numerous formats and methods for simulating various subsystems and scales remain siloed by different software tools. For example, each tool must be executed through a distinct interface. To help investigators find and use simulation tools, we developed BioSimulators (https://biosimulators.org), a central registry of the capabilities of simulation tools and consistent Python, command-line, and containerized interfaces to each version of each tool. The foundation of BioSimulators is standards, such as CellML, SBML, SED-ML, and the COMBINE archive format, and validation tools for simulation projects and simulation tools that ensure these standards are used consistently. To help modelers find tools for particular projects, we have also used the registry to develop recommendation services. We anticipate that BioSimulators will help modelers exchange, reproduce, and combine simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Practical Resources for Enhancing the Reproducibility of Mechanistic Modeling in Systems Biology
Authors:
Michael L. Blinov,
John H. Gennari,
Jonathan R. Karr,
Ion I. Moraru,
David P. Nickerson,
Herbert M. Sauro
Abstract:
Although reproducibility is a core tenet of the scientific method, it remains challenging to reproduce many results. Surprisingly, this also holds true for computational results in domains such as systems biology where there have been extensive standardization efforts. For example, Tiwari et al. recently found that they could only repeat 50% of published simulation results in systems biology. Towa…
▽ More
Although reproducibility is a core tenet of the scientific method, it remains challenging to reproduce many results. Surprisingly, this also holds true for computational results in domains such as systems biology where there have been extensive standardization efforts. For example, Tiwari et al. recently found that they could only repeat 50% of published simulation results in systems biology. Toward improving the reproducibility of computational systems research, we identified several resources that investigators can leverage to make their research more accessible, executable, and comprehensible by others. In particular, we identified several domain standards and curation services, as well as powerful approaches pioneered by the software engineering industry that we believe many investigators could adopt. Together, we believe these approaches could substantially enhance the reproducibility of systems biology research. In turn, we believe enhanced reproducibility would accelerate the development of more sophisticated models that could inform precision medicine and synthetic biology.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Deep phenotyping of cardiac function in heart transplant patients using cardiovascular systems models
Authors:
Amanda L. Colunga,
Karam G. Kim,
N. Payton Woodall,
Todd F. Dardas,
John H. Gennari,
Mette S. Olufsen,
Brian E. Carlson
Abstract:
Heart transplant patients are followed with periodic right heart catheterizations (RHCs) to identify post-transplant complications and guide treatment. Post-transplant positive outcomes are associated with a steady reduction of right ventricular and pulmonary arterial pressures, toward normal levels of right-side pressure (about 20mmHg) measured by RHC. This study shows more information about pati…
▽ More
Heart transplant patients are followed with periodic right heart catheterizations (RHCs) to identify post-transplant complications and guide treatment. Post-transplant positive outcomes are associated with a steady reduction of right ventricular and pulmonary arterial pressures, toward normal levels of right-side pressure (about 20mmHg) measured by RHC. This study shows more information about patient progression is obtained by combining standard RHC measures with mechanistic computational cardiovascular systems models. This study shows: to understand how cardiovascular system models can be used to represent a patient's cardiovascular state, and to use these models to track post-transplant recovery and outcome. To obtain reliable parameter estimates comparable within and across datasets, we use sensitivity analysis, parameter subset selection, and optimization to determine patient specific mechanistic parameter that can be reliably extracted from the RHC data. Patient-specific models are identified for ten patients from their first post-transplant RHC and longitudinal analysis is done for five patients. Results of sensitivity analysis and subset selection show we can reliably estimate seven non-measurable quantities including ventricular diastolic relaxation, systemic resistance, pulmonary venous elastance, pulmonary resistance, pulmonary arterial elastance, pulmonary valve resistance and systemic arterial elastance. Changes in parameters and predicted cardiovascular function post-transplant are used to evaluate cardiovascular state during recovery in five patients. Of these five patients, only one patient showed inconsistent trends during recovery in ventricular pressure-volume relationships and power output. At a four-year recovery time point this patient exhibited biventricular failure along with graft dysfunction while the remaining four exhibited no cardiovascular complications.
△ Less
Submitted 10 December, 2019; v1 submitted 26 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
